73 datasets found
  1. Amount of data created, consumed, and stored 2010-2023, with forecasts to...

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 30, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Amount of data created, consumed, and stored 2010-2023, with forecasts to 2028 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/871513/worldwide-data-created/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 30, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    May 2024
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    The total amount of data created, captured, copied, and consumed globally is forecast to increase rapidly, reaching *** zettabytes in 2024. Over the next five years up to 2028, global data creation is projected to grow to more than *** zettabytes. In 2020, the amount of data created and replicated reached a new high. The growth was higher than previously expected, caused by the increased demand due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as more people worked and learned from home and used home entertainment options more often. Storage capacity also growing Only a small percentage of this newly created data is kept though, as just * percent of the data produced and consumed in 2020 was saved and retained into 2021. In line with the strong growth of the data volume, the installed base of storage capacity is forecast to increase, growing at a compound annual growth rate of **** percent over the forecast period from 2020 to 2025. In 2020, the installed base of storage capacity reached *** zettabytes.

  2. i

    [ARCHIVE] Mediterranean Sea Chlorophyll-a trend map from Observations...

    • sextant.ifremer.fr
    • pigma.org
    Updated Nov 28, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CMEMS (2019). [ARCHIVE] Mediterranean Sea Chlorophyll-a trend map from Observations Reprocessing [Dataset]. https://sextant.ifremer.fr/geonetwork/srv/api/records/dd5f1e23-de60-4453-86c5-f89c204eb79f
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 28, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    OC-CNR-ROMA-IT
    CMEMS
    License

    MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1901
    Area covered
    Description

    '''This product has been archived''' For operationnal and online products, please visit https://marine.copernicus.eu

    '''DEFINITION'''

    This product includes the Mediterranean Sea satellite chlorophyll trend map from 1997 to 2020 based on regional chlorophyll reprocessed (REP) product as distributed by CMEMS OC-TAC. This dataset, derived from multi-sensor (SeaStar-SeaWiFS, AQUA-MODIS, NOAA20-VIIRS, NPP-VIIRS, Envisat-MERIS and Sentinel3A-OLCI) (at 1 km resolution) Rrs spectra produced by CNR using an in-house processing chain, is obtained by means of the Mediterranean Ocean Colour regional algorithms: an updated version of the MedOC4 (Case 1 (off-shore) waters, Volpe et al., 2019, with new coefficients) and AD4 (Case 2 (coastal) waters, Berthon and Zibordi, 2004). The processing chain and the techniques used for algorithms merging are detailed in Colella et al. (2021). The trend map is obtained by applying Colella et al. (2016) methodology, where the Mann-Kendall test (Mann, 1945; Kendall, 1975) and Sens’s method (Sen, 1968) are applied on deseasonalized monthly time series, as obtained from the X-11 technique (see e. g. Pezzulli et al. 2005), to estimate, trend magnitude and its significance. The trend is expressed in % per year that represents the relative changes (i.e., percentage) corresponding to the dimensional trend [mg m-3 y-1] with respect to the reference climatology (1997-2014). Only significant trends (p < 0.05) are included.

    '''CONTEXT'''

    Phytoplankton are key actors in the carbon cycle and, as such, recognised as an Essential Climate Variable (ECV). Chlorophyll concentration - as a proxy for phytoplankton - respond rapidly to changes in environmental conditions, such as light, temperature, nutrients and mixing (Colella et al. 2016). The character of the response depends on the nature of the change drivers, and ranges from seasonal cycles to decadal oscillations (Basterretxea et al. 2018). The Mediterranean Sea is an oligotrophic basin, where chlorophyll concentration decreases following a specific gradient from West to East (Colella et al. 2016). The highest concentrations are observed in coastal areas and at the river mouths, where the anthropogenic pressure and nutrient loads impact on the eutrophication regimes (Colella et al. 2016). The the use of long-term time series of consistent, well-calibrated, climate-quality data record is crucial for detecting eutrophication. Furthermore, chlorophyll analysis also demands the use of robust statistical temporal decomposition techniques, in order to separate the long-term signal from the seasonal component of the time series.

    '''CMEMS KEY FINDINGS'''

    Chlorophyll trend in the Mediterranean Sea, for the period 1997-2020, is negative over most of the basin. Positive trend areas are visible only in the southern part of the western Mediterranean basin, in the Gulf of Lion, Rhode Gyre and partially along the Croatian coast of the Adriatic Sea. On average the trend in the Mediterranean Sea is about -0.5% per year. Nevertheless, as shown by Salgado-Hernanz et al. (2019) in their analysis (related to 1998-2014 satellite observations), there is not a clear difference between western and eastern basins of the Mediterranean Sea. In the Ligurian Sea, the trend switch to negative values, differing from the positive regime observed in the trend maps of both Colella et al. (2016) and Salgado-Hernanz et al. (2019), referred, respectively, to 1998-2009 and 1998-2014 time period, respectively. The waters offshore the Po River mouth show weak negative trend values, partially differing from the markable negative regime observed in the 1998-2009 period (Colella et al., 2016), and definitely moving from the positive trend observed by Salgado-Hernanz et al. (2019).

    Note: The key findings will be updated annually in November, in line with OMI evolutions.

    '''DOI (product):''' https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00260

  3. Criminal court statistics quarterly: October to December 2020

    • gov.uk
    • s3.amazonaws.com
    Updated Mar 25, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ministry of Justice (2021). Criminal court statistics quarterly: October to December 2020 [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-court-statistics-quarterly-october-to-december-2020
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 25, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Ministry of Justice
    Description

    This is the quarterly Q4 2020 criminal courts statistics publication.

    The statistics here focus on key trends in case volume and progression through the criminal court system in England and Wales. This also includes:

    • Management information concerning the enforcement of financial penalties in England and Wales;

    • Experimental statistics on ‘the use of language interpreter and translation services in courts and tribunals;

    • Experimental statistics on Failure to Appear Warrants at magistrates’ courts in England and Wales.

    Additional data tools and CSVs have also been provided.

    Statisticians comment

    “This report covers the period to the end of December 2020 and shows the continued impact of COVID-19 on the criminal courts.

    Following the limited operation of the criminal courts and the gradual reintroduction of jury trials during the report period, the figures published today show the continued recovery in the system. This can be more clearly seen at the magistrates’ courts, where disposals remained above receipts and the outstanding caseload has consistently fallen.

    Some of the magistrates’ court disposals will feed directly through to the Crown Court, where receipts have maintained higher levels seen in Q3 2020. Disposals have increased but at a slower rate than receipts, as a result the outstanding caseload has continued to rise.

    We are publishing experimental analysis on the nature of the outstanding caseload for the first time. This shows that the age of outstanding cases has increased sharply due to the COVID-19 pandemic response and the proportion of cases which have been outstanding for more than a year has increased markedly.

    The trends at both magistrates’ courts and the Crown Court continue beyond the National Statistics series into more recent management information published by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Service (HMCTS) – which are highlighted in this document.”

    Criminal court statistics quarterly, January to March 2021

    The next criminal court statistics publication is scheduled for release in June 2021.

    Pre-release

    In addition to Ministry of Justice (MOJ) professional and production staff, pre-release access to the quarterly statistics of up to 24 hours is granted to the following post holders:

    Ministry of Justice

    Permanent Secretary; Director General, Policy, Communications and Analysis; Director, Criminal Justice Policy; Deputy Director, Criminal Courts Policy; Criminal Court Reform Lead; Courts and Tribunal Recovery Unit; Jurisdictional and Operational Support Manager; Head of Data and Analytical Services; Chief Statistician; 5 Press Officers.

    Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunals Service

    Chief Executive, HMCTS; Deputy Chief Executive, HMCTS; Deputy Director of Legal Services, Court Users and Summary Justice Reform; Head of Operational Performance; Head of Criminal Enforcement team, HMCTS; Head of data and management information, HMCTS; Head of Management Information Systems; Head of Communications; Head of News; Jurisdictional Operation manager and Head of Contracted Services and Performance for HMCTS Operations Directorate

    Bar Council

    Chair of the Bar Council, Director of Communications, Research Manager

    Home Office

    1 Senior Policy Official and 1 Statistician

  4. Global employer and employee hybrid work trends post COVID-19 2021

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 10, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Global employer and employee hybrid work trends post COVID-19 2021 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1226730/global-hybrid-work-trends-employee-employer-post-pandemic/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 10, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jan 12, 2021 - Jan 25, 2021
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    In 2021, ** percent of employees from a global survey want flexible remote work options to stay post-pandemic. As businesses around the world sent their employees into home office and remote work setups during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, both employees and employers have become accustomed to this new work situation. As a result, they appreciate the positive aspects and would like to retain them in the future.

  5. f

    Comparison of 30-day ahead forecasting performance (October 2, 2021 to...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 8, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Amna Tariq; Tsira Chakhaia; Sushma Dahal; Alexander Ewing; Xinyi Hua; Sylvia K. Ofori; Olaseni Prince; Argita D. Salindri; Ayotomiwa Ezekiel Adeniyi; Juan M. Banda; Pavel Skums; Ruiyan Luo; Leidy Y. Lara-Díaz; Raimund Bürger; Isaac Chun-Hai Fung; Eunha Shim; Alexander Kirpich; Anuj Srivastava; Gerardo Chowell (2023). Comparison of 30-day ahead forecasting performance (October 2, 2021 to October 31, 2021) by calibrating the GLM, Richards and the sub-epidemic model for 90 epidemic days (July 4, 2021 to October 1, 2021) at the national and regional level. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010228.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 8, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
    Authors
    Amna Tariq; Tsira Chakhaia; Sushma Dahal; Alexander Ewing; Xinyi Hua; Sylvia K. Ofori; Olaseni Prince; Argita D. Salindri; Ayotomiwa Ezekiel Adeniyi; Juan M. Banda; Pavel Skums; Ruiyan Luo; Leidy Y. Lara-Díaz; Raimund Bürger; Isaac Chun-Hai Fung; Eunha Shim; Alexander Kirpich; Anuj Srivastava; Gerardo Chowell
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Higher 95% PI coverage and lower RMSE, MAE, WIS and MIS represent better performance. Best performing model is given in bold with the superscript "a”.

  6. Comparison of model performance metrics by calibrating the GLM, Richards and...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 4, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Amna Tariq; Tsira Chakhaia; Sushma Dahal; Alexander Ewing; Xinyi Hua; Sylvia K. Ofori; Olaseni Prince; Argita D. Salindri; Ayotomiwa Ezekiel Adeniyi; Juan M. Banda; Pavel Skums; Ruiyan Luo; Leidy Y. Lara-Díaz; Raimund Bürger; Isaac Chun-Hai Fung; Eunha Shim; Alexander Kirpich; Anuj Srivastava; Gerardo Chowell (2023). Comparison of model performance metrics by calibrating the GLM, Richards and the sub-epidemic model for 90 epidemic days (July 4, 2021 to October 1, 2021) at the national and regional level. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010228.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 4, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Amna Tariq; Tsira Chakhaia; Sushma Dahal; Alexander Ewing; Xinyi Hua; Sylvia K. Ofori; Olaseni Prince; Argita D. Salindri; Ayotomiwa Ezekiel Adeniyi; Juan M. Banda; Pavel Skums; Ruiyan Luo; Leidy Y. Lara-Díaz; Raimund Bürger; Isaac Chun-Hai Fung; Eunha Shim; Alexander Kirpich; Anuj Srivastava; Gerardo Chowell
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Higher 95% PI coverage and lower RMSE, MAE, WIS and MIS represent better performance. Best performing model is given in bold with the superscript “a”.

  7. i

    [ARCHIVE] Baltic Sea Chlorophyll-a trend map from Observations Reprocessing

    • sextant.ifremer.fr
    Updated Feb 12, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CMEMS (2018). [ARCHIVE] Baltic Sea Chlorophyll-a trend map from Observations Reprocessing [Dataset]. https://sextant.ifremer.fr/geonetwork/srv/api/records/339a18cb-e9c9-43f0-9e3b-1164fd5b74e3
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 12, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    CMEMS
    OC-CNR-ROMA-IT
    License

    MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1901
    Area covered
    Description

    '''This product has been archived''' For operationnal and online products, please visit https://marine.copernicus.eu

    '''DEFINITION'''

    This product includes the Baltic Sea satellite chlorophyll trend map from 1997 to 2020 based on regional chlorophyll reprocessed (REP) product as distributed by CMEMS OC-TAC which, in turn, result from the application of the regional chlorophyll algorithms over remote sensing reflectances (Rrs) provided by the Plymouth Marine Laboratory (PML) using the ESA Ocean Colour Climate Change Initiative processor (ESA OC-CCI, Sathyendranath et al., 2018a). The chlorophyll product is derived from a Multi Layer Perceptron neural-net (MLP) developed on field measurements collected within the BiOMaP program of JRC/EC (Zibordi et al., 2011). The algorithm is an ensemble of different MLPs that use Rrs at different wavelengths as input. The processing chain and the techniques used to develop the algorithm are detailed in Brando et al. (2021a; 2021b). The trend map is obtained by applying Colella et al. (2016) methodology, where the Mann-Kendall test (Mann, 1945; Kendall, 1975) and Sens’s method (Sen, 1968) are applied on deseasonalized monthly time series, as obtained from the X-11 technique (see e. g. Pezzulli et al. 2005), to estimate, trend magnitude and its significance. The trend is expressed in % per year that represents the relative changes (i.e., percentage) corresponding to the dimensional trend [mg m-3 y-1] with respect to the reference climatology (1997-2014). Only significant trends (p < 0.05) are included.

    '''CONTEXT'''

    Phytoplankton are key actors in the carbon cycle and, as such, recognised as an Essential Climate Variable (ECV). Chlorophyll concentration - as a proxy for phytoplankton - respond rapidly to changes in environmental conditions, such as light, temperature, nutrients and mixing (Colella et al. 2016). The character of the response in the Baltic Sea depends on the nature of the change drivers, and ranges from seasonal cycles to decadal oscillations (Kahru and Elmgren 2014) and anthropogenic climate change. Eutrophication is one of the most important issue for the Baltic Sea (HELCOM, 2018), therefore the use of long-term time series of consistent, well-calibrated, climate-quality data record is crucial for detecting eutrophication. Furthermore, chlorophyll analysis also demands the use of robust statistical temporal decomposition techniques, in order to separate the long-term signal from the seasonal component of the time series.

    '''CMEMS KEY FINDINGS'''

    The average Baltic Sea trend for the 1997-2020 period is 0.5% per year. A positive trend characterizes the central area of the basin from Northern Baltic Proper to Southern part, throughout Eastern and Western Gotland Basin. This result is in accordance to those of Sathyendranath et al. (2018b), that reveal an increasing trend in chlorophyll concentration in most of the European Seas. Weak negative trend is observable in the eastern sector of Gulf of Finland, Bothnian Bay and over the Gulf of Riga. Generally, along the coast of the basin the trend is no significant. Finally, in the 1997-2020 time window, the Bothnian Bay does not show a specific positive or negative trend, with percentage close to zero.

    Note: The key findings will be updated annually in November, in line with OMI evolutions.

    '''DOI (product):''' https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00198

  8. c

    Number of Truck Accidents Per Year in U.S., 2020-2025

    • consumershield.com
    csv
    Updated Jul 8, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    ConsumerShield Research Team (2025). Number of Truck Accidents Per Year in U.S., 2020-2025 [Dataset]. https://www.consumershield.com/articles/semi-truck-accidents-per-year
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 8, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    ConsumerShield Research Team
    License

    Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    United States of America
    Description

    The graph illustrates the number of truck accidents in the United States from 2020 to 2025. The x-axis represents the years, ranging from 2020 to 2025, while the y-axis shows the number of truck accidents. In 2020, there were 142,637 accidents, which increased to a peak of 165,761 in 2021. The number slightly declined to 164,513 in 2022 and further decreased to 154,555 in 2023. The projected or preliminary figure for 2024 is 150,953, marking the lowest number in the dataset at the moment. Overall, the data exhibits a sharp increase in truck accidents in 2021, followed by a consistent downward trend in the subsequent years. This information is presented in a line graph format, effectively highlighting the annual changes and trends in truck accident occurrences in the United States.

  9. Trends in Carbon Dioxide

    • gml.noaa.gov
    text
    Updated Nov 5, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory (2024). Trends in Carbon Dioxide [Dataset]. https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/
    Explore at:
    textAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 5, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationhttp://www.noaa.gov/
    Authors
    NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1958 - Oct 1, 2024
    Area covered
    Description

    Trends of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide measurements from the Mauna Loa Baseline Observatory, Hawaii, United States.

  10. Road traffic estimates in Great Britain: 2021

    • gov.uk
    Updated Sep 28, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Department for Transport (2022). Road traffic estimates in Great Britain: 2021 [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/road-traffic-estimates-in-great-britain-2021
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 28, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Department for Transport
    Area covered
    United Kingdom
    Description

    Accessibility of tables

    The department is currently working to make our tables accessible for our users. The data tables for these statistics are now accessible. No data is affected by this change.

    We would welcome any feedback on the accessibility of our tables, please email traffic statistics.

    Estimates of road traffic by:

    • vehicle type
    • road type
    • geographical region

    in Great Britain for the year 2021.

    Road traffic trends during 2020 and 2021 were affected by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in the UK. Motor vehicle traffic on Great Britain roads increased by 11.9% between 2020 and 2021, to 297.6 billion vehicle miles. Traffic in 2021 was 12.1% lower compared to 2019 pre-pandemic levels.

    When compared to the year 2020:

    • car traffic increased by 12.2%
    • van traffic increased by 11.9%
    • lorry traffic increased by 7.9%
    • traffic on the Strategic Road Network increased by 14.6%
    • motorway traffic increased by 14.4%.
    • ‘A’ roads saw a 12.4% increase in traffic
    • minor road traffic increased by 10.0%

    Contact us

    Road traffic and vehicle speed compliance statistics

    Email mailto:roadtraff.stats@dft.gov.uk">roadtraff.stats@dft.gov.uk

    Media enquiries 0300 7777 878

  11. p

    [ARCHIVE] Mediterranean Sea Mean Sea Level time series and trend from...

    • pigma.org
    • sextant.ifremer.fr
    Updated Mar 30, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CMEMS (2023). [ARCHIVE] Mediterranean Sea Mean Sea Level time series and trend from Observations Reprocessing [Dataset]. https://www.pigma.org/geonetwork/srv/api/records/14f8f98a-19ed-46b0-bedf-83a8bf61d546
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    CMEMS
    SL-CLS-TOULOUSE-FR
    Area covered
    Description

    '''This product has been archived'''

    For operationnal and online products, please visit https://marine.copernicus.eu

    '''DEFINITION'''

    The ocean monitoring indicator of regional mean sea level is derived from the DUACS delayed-time (DT-2021 version) altimeter gridded maps of sea level anomalies based on a stable number of altimeters (two) in the satellite constellation. These products are distributed by the Copernicus Climate Change Service and the Copernicus Marine Service (SEALEVEL_GLO_PHY_CLIMATE_L4_MY_008_057). The mean sea level evolution estimated in the Mediterranean Sea is derived from the average of the gridded sea level maps weighted by the cosine of the latitude. The annual and semi-annual periodic signals are removed (least square fit of sinusoidal function) and the time series is low-pass filtered (175 days cut-off). The curve is corrected for the regional mean effect of the Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) using the ICE5G-VM2 GIA model (Peltier, 2004). During 1993-1998, the Global men sea level (hereafter GMSL) has been known to be affected by a TOPEX-A instrumental drift (WCRP Global Sea Level Budget Group, 2018; Legeais et al., 2020). This drift led to overestimate the trend of the GMSL during the first 6 years of the altimetry record (about 0.04 mm/y at global scale over the whole altimeter period). A correction of the drift is proposed for the Global mean sea level (Legeais et al., 2020). Whereas this TOPEX-A instrumental drift should also affect the regional mean sea level (hereafter RMSL) trend estimation, this empirical correction is currently not applied to the altimeter sea level dataset and resulting estimated for RMSL. Indeed, the pertinence of the global correction applied at regional scale has not been demonstrated yet and there is no clear consensus achieved on the way to proceed at regional scale. Additionally, the estimate of such a correction at regional scale is not obvious, especially in areas where few accurate independent measurements (e.g. in situ)- necessary for this estimation - are available. The trend uncertainty is provided in a 90% confidence interval (Prandi et al., 2021). This estimate only considers errors related to the altimeter observation system (i.e., orbit determination errors, geophysical correction errors and inter-mission bias correction errors). The presence of the interannual signal can strongly influence the trend estimation considering to the altimeter period considered (Wang et al., 2021; Cazenave et al., 2014). The uncertainty linked to this effect is not taken into account.

    '''CONTEXT'''

    The indicator on area averaged sea level is a crucial index of climate change, and individual components contribute to sea level rise, including expansion due to ocean warming and melting of glaciers and ice sheets (WCRP Global Sea Level Budget Group, 2018). According to the recent IPCC 6th assessment report, global mean sea level (GMSL) increased by 0.20 (0.15 to 0.25) m over the period 1901 to 2018 with a rate 25 of rise that has accelerated since the 1960s to 3.7 (3.2 to 4.2) mm yr-1 for the period 2006–2018. Human activity was very likely the main driver of observed GMSL rise since 1970 (IPCC WGII, 2021). The weight of the different contributions evolves with time and in the recent decades the mass change has increased, contributing to the on-going acceleration of the GMSL trend (IPCC, 2022a; Legeais et al., 2020; Horwath et al., 2022). At regional scale, sea level does not change homogenously, and RMSL rise can also be influenced by various other processes, with different spatial and temporal scales, such as local ocean dynamic, atmospheric forcing, Earth gravity and vertical land motion changes (IPCC WGI, 2021). Rising sea level can strongly affect population and infrastructures in coastal areas, increase their vulnerability and risks for food security, particularly in low lying areas and island states. Adverse impacts from floods, storms and tropical cyclones with related losses and damages have increased due to sea level rise, and increase their vulnerability and increase risks for food security, particularly in low lying areas and island states (IPCC, 2022b). Adaptation and mitigation measures such as the restoration of mangroves and coastal wetlands, reduce the risks from sea level rise (IPCC, 2022c). Beside a clear long-term trend, the regional mean sea level variation in the Mediterranean Sea shows an important interannual variability, with a high trend observed before 1999 and lower values afterward. This variability is associated with a variation of the different forcing. Steric effect has been the most important forcing before 1999 (Fenoglio-Marc, 2002; Vigo et al., 2005). Important change of the deep-water formation site also occurred in 1995. The latest is preconditioned by an important change of the sea surface circulation observed in the Ionian Sea in 1997-1998 (e.g. Gačić et al., 2011), under the influence of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and negative Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) phases (Incarbona et al., 2016). They may also impact the sea level trend in the basin (Vigo et al., 2005). In 2010-2011, high regional mean sea level has been related to enhanced water mass exchange at Gibraltar, under the influence of wind forcing during the negative phase of NAO (Landerer and Volkov, 2013).

    '''CMEMS KEY FINDINGS'''

    Over the [1993/01/01, 2021/08/02] period, the basin-wide RMSL in the Mediterranean Sea rises at a rate of 2.7  0.83 mm/year.

    '''DOI (product):''' https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00264

  12. d

    Nitrogen concentrations and loads and seasonal nitrogen loads in selected...

    • datasets.ai
    • s.cnmilf.com
    • +2more
    55
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Department of the Interior, Nitrogen concentrations and loads and seasonal nitrogen loads in selected Long Island Sound tributaries, water years 1995-2021 (ver. 1.1, February 2024) [Dataset]. https://datasets.ai/datasets/nitrogen-concentrations-and-loads-and-seasonal-nitrogen-loads-in-selected-long-island-1995-5f826
    Explore at:
    55Available download formats
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Department of the Interior
    Area covered
    Long Island, Long Island Sound
    Description

    This U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) data release presents tabular data on nitrogen concentrations and loads for multiple nitrogen species, and river discharge data used in the analysis of data collected from October 1994 to September 2021. Data on flow and nitrogen concentrations were analyzed using the USGS Exploration and Graphics for RivEr Trends (EGRET) R package, and the method of Weighted Regression on Time Discharge and Season (WRTDS). Data and outputs summarized are for water-quality data collected from 17 water-quality monitoring stations in the Long Island Sound watershed. Specific data in tabular format for this release include: calculated annual nitrogen concentration and loads, calculated annual flow-normalized nitrogen concentrations and loads by water year (for sites with 20 years of data or more), and calculated annual seasonal loads of each nitrogen constituent by calendar year. Measured daily river discharge data and sampled nitrogen concentration data for each water-quality monitoring site are available as outputs accessible within R statistical software and as comma-separated values (CSV) files. This data release provides an update of data originally generated for use in nitrogen budget models for Long Island Sound (Vlahos and others, 2020), and the associated data release (Mullaney, 2020). Mullaney, J.R., 2020, Nitrogen concentrations and loads and seasonal nitrogen loads in selected Long Island Sound tributaries, water years 1995-2016: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9AVXGBB. Vlahos, P., Whitney, M.M., Menniti, C., Mullaney, J.R., Morrison, J., Jia, Y., 2020, Nitrogen budgets of the Long Island Sound estuary: Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science, v. 232, no 104693, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106493.

  13. Dates for Rt estimation for the national and regional epidemic curves for...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Amna Tariq; Tsira Chakhaia; Sushma Dahal; Alexander Ewing; Xinyi Hua; Sylvia K. Ofori; Olaseni Prince; Argita D. Salindri; Ayotomiwa Ezekiel Adeniyi; Juan M. Banda; Pavel Skums; Ruiyan Luo; Leidy Y. Lara-Díaz; Raimund Bürger; Isaac Chun-Hai Fung; Eunha Shim; Alexander Kirpich; Anuj Srivastava; Gerardo Chowell (2023). Dates for Rt estimation for the national and regional epidemic curves for the first 30 epidemic days. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010228.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Amna Tariq; Tsira Chakhaia; Sushma Dahal; Alexander Ewing; Xinyi Hua; Sylvia K. Ofori; Olaseni Prince; Argita D. Salindri; Ayotomiwa Ezekiel Adeniyi; Juan M. Banda; Pavel Skums; Ruiyan Luo; Leidy Y. Lara-Díaz; Raimund Bürger; Isaac Chun-Hai Fung; Eunha Shim; Alexander Kirpich; Anuj Srivastava; Gerardo Chowell
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Dates for Rt estimation for the national and regional epidemic curves for the first 30 epidemic days.

  14. COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports

    • google.com
    • google.com.tr
    • +4more
    csv, pdf
    Updated Oct 17, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Google (2022). COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports [Dataset]. https://www.google.com/covid19/mobility/
    Explore at:
    csv, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 17, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Googlehttp://google.com/
    Google Searchhttp://google.com/
    Authors
    Google
    Description

    As global communities responded to COVID-19, we heard from public health officials that the same type of aggregated, anonymized insights we use in products such as Google Maps would be helpful as they made critical decisions to combat COVID-19. These Community Mobility Reports aimed to provide insights into what changed in response to policies aimed at combating COVID-19. The reports charted movement trends over time by geography, across different categories of places such as retail and recreation, groceries and pharmacies, parks, transit stations, workplaces, and residential.

  15. i

    [ARCHIVE] North West Atlantic Shelf Mean Sea Level time series and trend...

    • sextant.ifremer.fr
    Updated Nov 28, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CMEMS (2019). [ARCHIVE] North West Atlantic Shelf Mean Sea Level time series and trend from Observations Reprocessing [Dataset]. https://sextant.ifremer.fr/geonetwork/srv/api/records/4bfde6b8-e94a-472e-83ec-0c6cc9863883
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 28, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    CMEMS
    SL-CLS-TOULOUSE-FR
    License

    MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    '''This product has been archived'''

    For operationnal and online products, please visit https://marine.copernicus.eu

    '''DEFINITION'''

    The ocean monitoring indicator on mean sea level is derived from the DUACS delayed-time (DT-2021 version) altimeter gridded maps of sea level anomalies based on a stable number of altimeters (two) in the satellite constellation. These products are distributed by the Copernicus Climate Change Service and by the Copernicus Marine Service (SEALEVEL_GLO_PHY_CLIMATE_L4_MY_008_057). The mean sea level evolution estimated in the North-West Shelf region is derived from the average of the gridded sea level maps weighted by the cosine of the latitude. The annual and semi-annual periodic signals are removed (least scare fit of sinusoidal function) and the time series is low-pass filtered (175 days cut-off). The curve is corrected for the regional mean effect of the Glacial Isostatic Adjustment using the ICE5G-VM2 GIA model (Peltier, 2004). During 1993-1998, the Global men sea level (hereafter GMSL) has been known to be affected by a TOPEX-A instrumental drift (WCRP Global Sea Level Budget Group, 2018; Legeais et al., 2020). This drift led to overestimate the trend of the GMSL during the first 6 years of the altimetry record (about 0.04 mm/y at global scale over the whole altimeter period). A correction of the drift is proposed for the Global mean sea level (Legeais et al., 2020). Whereas this TOPEX-A instrumental drift should also affect the regional mean sea level (hereafter RMSL) trend estimation, this empirical correction is currently not applied to the altimeter sea level dataset and resulting estimated for RMSL. Indeed, the pertinence of the global correction applied at regional scale has not been demonstrated yet and there is no clear consensus achieved on the way to proceed at regional scale. Additionally, the estimate of such a correction at regional scale is not obvious, especially in areas where few accurate independent measurements (e.g. in situ)- necessary for this estimation - are available. The trend uncertainty is provided in a 90% confidence interval (Prandi et al., 2021). This estimate only considers errors related to the altimeter observation system (i.e., orbit determination errors, geophysical correction errors and inter-mission bias correction errors). The presence of the interannual signal can strongly influence the trend estimation considering to the altimeter period considered (Wang et al., 2021; Cazenave et al., 2014). The uncertainty linked to this effect is not taken into account.

    '''CONTEXT'''

    The indicator on area averaged sea level is a crucial index of climate change, and individual components contribute to sea level rise, including expansion due to ocean warming and melting of glaciers and ice sheets (WCRP Global Sea Level Budget Group, 2018). According to the recent IPCC 6th assessment report, global mean sea level (GMSL) increased by 0.20 (0.15 to 0.25) m over the period 1901 to 2018 with a rate 25 of rise that has accelerated since the 1960s to 3.7 (3.2 to 4.2) mm yr-1 for the period 2006–2018. Human activity was very likely the main driver of observed GMSL rise since 1970 (IPCC WGII, 2021). The weight of the different contributions evolves with time and in the recent decades the mass change has increased, contributing to the on-going acceleration of the GMSL trend (IPCC, 2022a; Legeais et al., 2020; Horwath et al., 2022). At regional scale, sea level does not change homogenously, and RMSL rise can also be influenced by various other processes, with different spatial and temporal scales, such as local ocean dynamic, atmospheric forcing, Earth gravity and vertical land motion changes (IPCC WGI, 2021). Rising sea level can strongly affect population and infrastructures in coastal areas, increase their vulnerability and risks for food security, particularly in low lying areas and island states. Adverse impacts from floods, storms and tropical cyclones with related losses and damages have increased due to sea level rise, and increase their vulnerability and increase risks for food security, particularly in low lying areas and island states (IPCC, 2022b). Adaptation and mitigation measures such as the restoration of mangroves and coastal wetlands, reduce the risks from sea level rise (IPCC, 2022c). In this region, the RMSL trend is modulated decadal variations. As observed over the global ocean, the main actors of the long-term RMSL trend are associated with anthropogenic global/regional warming. Decadal variability is mainly linked to the Strengthening or weakening of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) (e.g. Chafik et al., 2019). The latest is driven by the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) (e.g. Delworth and Zeng, 2016). Along the European coast, the NAO also influences the along-slope winds dynamic which in return significantly contributes to the local sea level variability observed (Chafik et al., 2019).

    '''CMEMS KEY FINDINGS'''

    Over the [1993/01/01, 2021/08/02] period, the basin-wide RMSL in the NWS area rises at a rate of 3.0  0.83 mm/year.

    '''DOI (product):''' https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00271

  16. p

    [ARCHIVE] Atlantic Iberian Biscay Mean Sea Level time series and trend from...

    • pigma.org
    • sextant.ifremer.fr
    Updated Mar 30, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CMEMS (2023). [ARCHIVE] Atlantic Iberian Biscay Mean Sea Level time series and trend from Observations Reprocessing [Dataset]. https://www.pigma.org/geonetwork/srv/api/records/280c48d8-a09c-411a-a7b0-4da933532604
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    CMEMS
    SL-CLS-TOULOUSE-FR
    Area covered
    Description

    '''This product has been archived'''

    For operationnal and online products, please visit https://marine.copernicus.eu

    '''DEFINITION'''

    The ocean monitoring indicator on regional mean sea level is derived from the DUACS delayed-time (DT-2021 version) altimeter gridded maps of sea level anomalies based on a stable number of altimeters (two) in the satellite constellation. These products are distributed by the Copernicus Climate Change Service and the Copernicus Marine Service (SEALEVEL_GLO_PHY_CLIMATE_L4_MY_008_057). The mean sea level evolution estimated in the Irish-Biscay-Iberian (IBI) region is derived from the average of the gridded sea level maps weighted by the cosine of the latitude. The annual and semi-annual periodic signals are removed (least square fit of sinusoidal function) and the time series is low-pass filtered (175 days cut-off). The curve is corrected for the regional mean effect of the Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) using the ICE5G-VM2 GIA model (Peltier, 2004). During 1993-1998, the Global men sea level (hereafter GMSL) has been known to be affected by a TOPEX-A instrumental drift (WCRP Global Sea Level Budget Group, 2018; Legeais et al., 2020). This drift led to overestimate the trend of the GMSL during the first 6 years of the altimetry record (about 0.04 mm/y at global scale over the whole altimeter period). A correction of the drift is proposed for the Global mean sea level (Legeais et al., 2020). Whereas this TOPEX-A instrumental drift should also affect the regional mean sea level (hereafter RMSL) trend estimation, currently this empirical correction is currently not applied to the altimeter sea level dataset and resulting estimated for RMSL. Indeed, the pertinence of the global correction applied at regional scale has not been demonstrated yet and there is no clear consensus achieved on the way to proceed at regional scale. Additionally, the estimation of such a correction at regional scale is not obvious, especially in areas where few accurate independent measurements (e.g. in situ)- necessary for this estimation - are available. The trend uncertainty is provided in a 90% confidence interval (Prandi et al., 2021). This estimate only considers errors related to the altimeter observation system (i.e., orbit determination errors, geophysical correction errors and inter-mission bias correction errors). The presence of the interannual signal can strongly influence the trend estimation considering to the altimeter period considered (Wang et al., 2021; Cazenave et al., 2014). The uncertainty linked to this effect is not taken into account.

    '''CONTEXT'''

    The indicator on area averaged sea level is a crucial index of climate change, and individual components contribute to sea level rise, including expansion due to ocean warming and melting of glaciers and ice sheets (WCRP Global Sea Level Budget Group, 2018). According to the recent IPCC 6th assessment report, global mean sea level (GMSL) increased by 0.20 (0.15 to 0.25) m over the period 1901 to 2018 with a rate 25 of rise that has accelerated since the 1960s to 3.7 (3.2 to 4.2) mm yr-1 for the period 2006–2018. Human activity was very likely the main driver of observed GMSL rise since 1970 (IPCC WGII, 2021). The weight of the different contributions evolves with time and in the recent decades the mass change has increased, contributing to the on-going acceleration of the GMSL trend (IPCC, 2022a; Legeais et al., 2020; Horwath et al., 2022). At regional scale, sea level does not change homogenously, and RMSL rise can also be influenced by various other processes, with different spatial and temporal scales, such as local ocean dynamic, atmospheric forcing, Earth gravity and vertical land motion changes (IPCC WGI, 2021). Rising sea level can strongly affect population and infrastructures in coastal areas, increase their vulnerability and risks for food security, particularly in low lying areas and island states. Adverse impacts from floods, storms and tropical cyclones with related losses and damages have increased due to sea level rise, and increase their vulnerability and increase risks for food security, particularly in low lying areas and island states (IPCC, 2022b). Adaptation and mitigation measures such as the restoration of mangroves and coastal wetlands, reduce the risks from sea level rise (IPCC, 2022c). In IBI region, the RMSL trend is modulated by decadal variations. As observed over the global ocean, the main actors of the long-term RMSL trend are associated with anthropogenic global/regional warming. Decadal variability is mainly linked to the strengthening or weakening of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) (e.g. Chafik et al., 2019). The latest is driven by the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) (e.g. Delworth and Zeng, 2016). Along the European coast, the NAO also influences the along-slope winds dynamic which in return significantly contributes to the local sea level variability observed (Chafik et al., 2019).

    '''CMEMS KEY FINDINGS'''

    Over the [1993/01/01, 2021/08/02] period, the basin-wide RMSL in the IBI area rises at a rate of 3.8  0.82 mm/year.

    '''DOI (product):''' https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00252

  17. Tesla monthly share price on the Nasdaq stock exchange 2010-2025

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Tesla monthly share price on the Nasdaq stock exchange 2010-2025 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1331184/tesla-share-price-development-monthly/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 24, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jul 2010 - Feb 2025
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The price of Tesla shares traded on the Nasdaq stock exchange remained rather stable between July 2010 and January 2020. With the beginning of 2020, the price of Tesla share increased dramatically and stood at ****** U.S. dollars per share in November 2021. Since then, the price of Tesla share fluctuated significantly and reached its peak at ****** U.S. dollars per share in December 2024, before falling dramatically in February 2025. Why did Tesla's stock value go up in 2020? Despite the effects of the pandemic, Tesla share prices experienced a massive increase in 2020. Tesla kept increasing its output levels throughout the year, except for the second quarter, and released its new vehicle Tesla Model Y. Additionally, when the company was added to the S&P 500 index in August 2020, it instilled further trust in investors. In 2020, Tesla was the top-performing stock on the S&P 500 index, and two years later, in 2024, it ranked among the ten largest companies on the index by market capitalization. Steady growth in the last decade Founded in 2003, Tesla primarily focuses on designing and producing electric vehicles, as well as energy generation and storage systems. Since then, Tesla's revenue has steadily increased, reaching nearly ** million U.S. dollars in 2024. Most of the revenue came from automotive sales in 2024. Tesla's first electric car, the Roadster, was sold between 2008 and 2012. Currently, the company offers four primary electric vehicles: Model 3, Model Y, Model S, and Model X.

  18. Criminal justice system statistics quarterly: December 2020

    • gov.uk
    • s3.amazonaws.com
    Updated May 20, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ministry of Justice (2021). Criminal justice system statistics quarterly: December 2020 [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-justice-system-statistics-quarterly-december-2020
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 20, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Ministry of Justice
    Description

    This report presents key statistics on activity in the criminal justice system for England and Wales. It provides information up to the year ending December 2020 with accompanying commentary, analysis and presentation of longer-term trends.

    We continue to review our data gathering, access and release practices during the pandemic, focusing efforts on priority analysis and statistics. Our statement explains this further. Of particular note, we temporarily paused access to the Police National Computer earlier this year, to minimise non-essential travel by our analysts. Whilst access has now resumed, work is being resumed on a priority basis. As a result, and in line with guidance from the Office for Statistics Regulation, the decision has been made to delay the publishing of cautions data and the offending histories chapter of this publication. We will keep users updated of any further changes via our published release calendar.

    Statistician’s comment:

    The figures published today highlight the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on criminal court prosecutions and outcomes over the last year. Latest short-term trends are mostly reflective of the impact of the pandemic on court processes and prioritisation rather than a continuation of the longer-term series.

    The monthly data shows that following the sharp falls in overall prosecutions and convictions immediately following the March 2020 ‘lockdown’, these have since recovered, although not quite to pre-pandemic levels. Indictable offences have recovered faster than summary offences, reflecting the prioritisation of cases that were likely to result in a custodial sentence, this has also led to an increase in the proportion of defendants remanded in custody.

    The custody rate increased in the latest year due to a higher proportion of indictable offences dealt with in court since April 2020, while the overall average custodial sentence length remained stable compared to 2019.

  19. Estimates of reproduction number (R), growth rate parameter (r) and...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 31, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Amna Tariq; Tsira Chakhaia; Sushma Dahal; Alexander Ewing; Xinyi Hua; Sylvia K. Ofori; Olaseni Prince; Argita D. Salindri; Ayotomiwa Ezekiel Adeniyi; Juan M. Banda; Pavel Skums; Ruiyan Luo; Leidy Y. Lara-Díaz; Raimund Bürger; Isaac Chun-Hai Fung; Eunha Shim; Alexander Kirpich; Anuj Srivastava; Gerardo Chowell (2023). Estimates of reproduction number (R), growth rate parameter (r) and deceleration of the growth parameter (p) obtained from the renewal equation method utilizing the GGM for the early ascending phase of the epidemic (30 days) at the national and regional level at α = 1.00. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010228.t005
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Amna Tariq; Tsira Chakhaia; Sushma Dahal; Alexander Ewing; Xinyi Hua; Sylvia K. Ofori; Olaseni Prince; Argita D. Salindri; Ayotomiwa Ezekiel Adeniyi; Juan M. Banda; Pavel Skums; Ruiyan Luo; Leidy Y. Lara-Díaz; Raimund Bürger; Isaac Chun-Hai Fung; Eunha Shim; Alexander Kirpich; Anuj Srivastava; Gerardo Chowell
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Estimates of reproduction number (R), growth rate parameter (r) and deceleration of the growth parameter (p) obtained from the renewal equation method utilizing the GGM for the early ascending phase of the epidemic (30 days) at the national and regional level at α = 1.00.

  20. Incident and Emergency Management Industry Trend | Incident and Emergency...

    • emergenresearch.com
    pdf,excel,csv,ppt
    Updated Jun 7, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Emergen Research (2022). Incident and Emergency Management Industry Trend | Incident and Emergency Management Market Forecast 2021-2030 [Dataset]. https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/incident-and-emergency-management-market
    Explore at:
    pdf,excel,csv,pptAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 7, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Emergen Research
    License

    https://www.emergenresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.emergenresearch.com/privacy-policy

    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Base Year, No. of Pages, Growth Drivers, Forecast Period, Segments covered, Historical Data for, Pitfalls Challenges, 2030 Value Projection, Tables, Charts, and Figures, Forecast Period 2022 - 2030 CAGR, and 1 more
    Description

    The global Incident and Emergency Management market size reached USD 124.68 Billion in 2020 and is expected to reach USD 226.93 Billion in 2030 registering a CAGR of 7.0%. Incident and Emergency Management industry report classifies global market by share, trend, growth and based on system type, ser...

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2025). Amount of data created, consumed, and stored 2010-2023, with forecasts to 2028 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/871513/worldwide-data-created/
Organization logo

Amount of data created, consumed, and stored 2010-2023, with forecasts to 2028

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Jun 30, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Time period covered
May 2024
Area covered
Worldwide
Description

The total amount of data created, captured, copied, and consumed globally is forecast to increase rapidly, reaching *** zettabytes in 2024. Over the next five years up to 2028, global data creation is projected to grow to more than *** zettabytes. In 2020, the amount of data created and replicated reached a new high. The growth was higher than previously expected, caused by the increased demand due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as more people worked and learned from home and used home entertainment options more often. Storage capacity also growing Only a small percentage of this newly created data is kept though, as just * percent of the data produced and consumed in 2020 was saved and retained into 2021. In line with the strong growth of the data volume, the installed base of storage capacity is forecast to increase, growing at a compound annual growth rate of **** percent over the forecast period from 2020 to 2025. In 2020, the installed base of storage capacity reached *** zettabytes.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu