7 datasets found
  1. Replication dataset for PIIE PB 24-1, Why Trump’s tariff proposals would...

    • piie.com
    Updated May 20, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kimberly Clausing; Mary E. Lovely (2024). Replication dataset for PIIE PB 24-1, Why Trump’s tariff proposals would harm working Americans by Kimberly Clausing and Mary E. Lovely (2024). [Dataset]. https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/2024/why-trumps-tariff-proposals-would-harm-working-americans
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 20, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Peterson Institute for International Economicshttp://www.piie.com/
    Authors
    Kimberly Clausing; Mary E. Lovely
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This data package includes the underlying data files to replicate the data, tables, and charts presented in Why Trump’s tariff proposals would harm working Americans, PIIE Policy Brief 24-1.

    If you use the data, please cite as: Clausing, Kimberly, and Mary E. Lovely. 2024. Why Trump’s tariff proposals would harm working Americans. PIIE Policy Brief 24-1. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

  2. Opinion of U.S. adults on Biden's responsibility for inflation rate 2022

    • statista.com
    Updated Aug 12, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Opinion of U.S. adults on Biden's responsibility for inflation rate 2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1307099/biden-perceived-responsibility-inflation-rate-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 12, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jul 9, 2022 - Jul 11, 2022
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    According to a survey conducted between July 9 and July 11, 2022, 45 percent of Americans thought that Joe Biden was highly responsible for the current trend in the inflation rate. This is compared to 26 percent of Americans who said President Biden did not have a lot of responsibility for the current inflation rate.

    Inflation in the U.S. Global events in 2022 had a significant impact on the United States. Inflation rose from 1.4 percent in January 2021 to 9.1 percent in June 2022. Significantly higher prices of basic goods led to increased concern over the state of the economy, and the ability to cover increasing monthly costs with the same income. Low interest rates, COVID-19-related supply constraints, corporate profiteering, and strong consumer spending had already put pressure on prices before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Despite rising wages on paper, the rapid growth of consumer prices resulted in an overall decline in real hourly earnings in the first half of 2022.

    How much control does Joe Biden have over inflation? The bulk of economic performance and the inflation rate is determined by factors outside the President’s direct control, but U.S. presidents are often held accountable for it. Some of those factors are market forces, private business, productivity growth, the state of the global economy, and policies of the Federal Reserve. Although high-spending decisions such as the 2021 COVID-19 relief bill may have contributed to rising inflation rates, the bill has been seen by economists as a necessary intervention for preventing a recession at the time, as well as being of significant importance to low-income workers impacted by the pandemic.

    The most important tool for curbing inflation and controlling the U.S. economy is the Federal Reserve. The Reserve has the ability to set, raise, and lower interest rates and determine the wider monetary policy for the United States – something out of the president’s control. In June 2022, the Reserve announced it would raise interest rates 0.75 percent for the second time that year – hoisting the rate to a target range of 2.25 to 2.5 percent – in an attempt to slow consumer demand and balance demand with supply. However, it can often take time before the impacts of interventions by the Federal Reserve are seen in the public’s day-to-day lives. Most economists expect this wave of inflation to pass in a year to 18 months.

  3. Replication dataset and calculations for PIIE WP 24-20 The International...

    • piie.com
    Updated Sep 26, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Warwick J. McKibbin; Megan Hogan; Marcus Noland (2024). Replication dataset and calculations for PIIE WP 24-20 The International Economic Implications of a Second Trump Presidency by Warwick McKibbin, Megan Hogan, and Marcus Noland (2024). [Dataset]. https://www.piie.com/publications/working-papers/2024/international-economic-implications-second-trump-presidency
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 26, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Peterson Institute for International Economicshttp://www.piie.com/
    Authors
    Warwick J. McKibbin; Megan Hogan; Marcus Noland
    Description

    This data package includes the underlying data to replicate the charts and calculations presented in The International Economic Implications of a Second Trump Presidency, PIIE Working Paper 24-20.

    If you use the data, please cite as:

    McKibbin, Warwick, Megan Hogan, and Marcus Noland. 2024. The International Economic Implications of a Second Trump Presidency. PIIE Working Paper 24-20. Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

  4. Replication dataset and calculations for PIIE Briefing 25-2 The US Revenue...

    • piie.com
    Updated Apr 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Warwick J. McKibbin; Geoffrey Shuetrim (2025). Replication dataset and calculations for PIIE Briefing 25-2 The US Revenue Implications of President Trump’s 2025 Tariffs by Warwick McKibbin and Geoffrey Shuetrim (2025). [Dataset]. https://www.piie.com/publications/piie-briefings/2025/us-revenue-implications-president-trumps-2025-tariffs
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 22, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Peterson Institute for International Economicshttp://www.piie.com/
    Authors
    Warwick J. McKibbin; Geoffrey Shuetrim
    Description

    This data package includes the underlying data to replicate the charts, tables, and calculations presented in The US Revenue Implications of President Trump’s 2025 Tariffs, PIIE Briefing 25-2.

    If you use the data, please cite as:

    McKibbin, Warwick, and Geoffrey Shuetrim. 2025. The US Revenue Implications of President Trump’s 2025 Tariffs. PIIE Briefing 25-2. Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

  5. Size of Federal Reserve's balance sheet 2007-2025

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 2, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Size of Federal Reserve's balance sheet 2007-2025 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1121448/fed-balance-sheet-timeline/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 2, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Aug 1, 2007 - Jun 25, 2025
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The Federal Reserve's balance sheet has undergone significant changes since 2007, reflecting its response to major economic crises. From a modest *** trillion U.S. dollars at the end of 2007, it ballooned to approximately **** trillion U.S. dollars by June 2025. This dramatic expansion, particularly during the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic - both of which resulted in negative annual GDP growth in the U.S. - showcases the Fed's crucial role in stabilizing the economy through expansionary monetary policies. Impact on inflation and interest rates The Fed's expansionary measures, while aimed at stimulating economic growth, have had notable effects on inflation and interest rates. Following the quantitative easing in 2020, inflation in the United States reached ***** percent in 2022, the highest since 1991. However, by *************, inflation had declined to *** percent. Concurrently, the Federal Reserve implemented a series of interest rate hikes, with the rate peaking at **** percent in ***********, before the first rate cut since ************** occurred in **************. Financial implications for the Federal Reserve The expansion of the Fed's balance sheet and subsequent interest rate hikes have had significant financial implications. In 2023, the Fed reported a negative net income of ***** billion U.S. dollars, a stark contrast to the ***** billion U.S. dollars profit in 2022. This unprecedented shift was primarily due to rapidly rising interest rates, which caused the Fed's interest expenses to soar to over *** billion U.S. dollars in 2023. Despite this, the Fed's net interest income on securities acquired through open market operations reached a record high of ****** billion U.S. dollars in the same year.

  6. U.S. most important issues 2025

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). U.S. most important issues 2025 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1362236/most-important-voter-issues-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 24, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Feb 16, 2025 - Feb 18, 2025
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    A survey conducted in February 2025 found that the most important issue for ** percent of Americans was inflation and prices. A further ** percent of respondents were most concerned about jobs and the economy.

  7. U.S. debt growth 1969-2023, by president

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated Jun 27, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). U.S. debt growth 1969-2023, by president [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1366899/percent-change-national-debt-president-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 27, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Adding to national debt is an inevitable fact of being President of the United States. The extent to which debt rises under any sitting president depends not only on the policy and spending choices they have made, but also the choices made by presidents and congresses that have come before them. Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush President Ronald Reagan increased the U.S. debt by around **** trillion U.S. dollars, or ****** percent. This is often attributed to "Reaganomics," in which Reagan implemented significant supply-side economic policies in which he reduced government regulation, cut taxes, and tightened the money supply. Spending increased under President George W. Bush in light of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. To finance the wars, President Bush chose to borrow the money, rather than use war bonds or increase taxes, unlike previous war-time presidents. Additionally, Bush introduced a number of tax cuts, and oversaw the beginning of the 2008 financial crisis. Barack Obama President Obama inherited both wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the financial crisis. The Obama administration also did not increase taxes to pay for the wars, and additionally passed expensive legislation to kickstart the economy following the economic crash, as well as the Affordable Care Act in 2010. The ACA expanded healthcare coverage to cover more than ** million more Americans through programs like Medicare and Medicaid. Though controversial at the time, more than half of Americans have a favorable view of the ACA in 2023. Additionally, he signed legislation making the W. Bush-era tax cuts permanent.

  8. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Kimberly Clausing; Mary E. Lovely (2024). Replication dataset for PIIE PB 24-1, Why Trump’s tariff proposals would harm working Americans by Kimberly Clausing and Mary E. Lovely (2024). [Dataset]. https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/2024/why-trumps-tariff-proposals-would-harm-working-americans
Organization logo

Replication dataset for PIIE PB 24-1, Why Trump’s tariff proposals would harm working Americans by Kimberly Clausing and Mary E. Lovely (2024).

Explore at:
7 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
May 20, 2024
Dataset provided by
Peterson Institute for International Economicshttp://www.piie.com/
Authors
Kimberly Clausing; Mary E. Lovely
Area covered
United States
Description

This data package includes the underlying data files to replicate the data, tables, and charts presented in Why Trump’s tariff proposals would harm working Americans, PIIE Policy Brief 24-1.

If you use the data, please cite as: Clausing, Kimberly, and Mary E. Lovely. 2024. Why Trump’s tariff proposals would harm working Americans. PIIE Policy Brief 24-1. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu