This data package includes the underlying data and files to replicate the calculations, charts, and tables presented in Did Trump's Trade War Impact the 2018 Election?, PIIE Working Paper 19-21. If you use the data, please cite as: Blanchard, Emily, and Chad P. Bown. (2019). Did Trump's Trade War Impact the 2018 Election?. PIIE Working Paper 19-21. Peterson Institute for International Economics.

According to estimates, if President Trump's proposed tariffs go into effect permanently, the United States' GDP would decrease by 0.4 percent. Of this, 0.3 percent would be from the 25 percent tariff on all imports from Canada and Mexico, while 0.1 percent would be from the 10 percent tariff on all imports from China. As of February 10, China imposed retaliatory tariffs on the United States, with a 15 percent tariff on coal and liquid natural gas, and a 10 percent tariff on other exports, including oil, machinery, and large motor vehicles.

This data package includes the underlying data and files to replicate the calculations, charts, and tables presented in What Might a Trump Withdrawal from the World Trade Organization Mean for US Tariffs?, PIIE Policy Brief 18-23. If you use the data, please cite as: Bown, Chad P., and Douglas A. Irwin. (2018). What Might a Trump Withdrawal from the World Trade Organization Mean for US Tariffs?. PIIE Policy Brief 18-23. Peterson Institute for International Economics.

The Trump administration's unprecedented tariffs are accelerating US-China decoupling, compelling business leaders to rethink strategies after decades of established trade norms.

The majority of businesses in Japan were affected by the tariffs announced by the Trump administration, according to a survey conducted in April 2025. While **** percent of respondents stated that they would reduce their exports to the United States from overseas branches, the share that planned a reduction of exports from Japan was ********************.

This data package includes the underlying data files to replicate the data, tables, and charts presented in Why Trump’s tariff proposals would harm working Americans, PIIE Policy Brief 24-1.

If you use the data, please cite as: Clausing, Kimberly, and Mary E. Lovely. 2024. Why Trump’s tariff proposals would harm working Americans. PIIE Policy Brief 24-1. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

This data package includes the underlying data and files to replicate the calculations, charts, and tables presented in Steel, Aluminum, Lumber, Solar: Trump's Stealth Trade Protection, PIIE Policy Brief 17-21. If you use the data, please cite as: Bown, Chad P. (2017). Steel, Aluminum, Lumber, Solar: Trump's Stealth Trade Protection. PIIE Policy Brief 17-21. Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Discover the implications of new U.S. tariffs under Trump, affecting farmers and global trade dynamics.

This statistic shows the estimated value of the retaliation limits permitted by the World Trade Organization for major trading partners of the United States should a case be brought against the United States as a result of President Trump's proposed tariff on steel and aluminum imports, as of **********. The retaliation limit is based on the estimated export losses due to Trump's trade tariffs. Should such a case be successful these figures show the retaliation capacity of each country as they could then impose tariffs against the United States on other products to the prescribed value without breaking World Trade Organization regulations.

It is estimated that if the case were successful, Canada would be able to impose tariffs on U.S. imports to the value of *** billion U.S. dollars. This retaliation limit would be awarded to them by the World Trade Organization, allowing tariffs that would normally risk sanctions. The *** billion U.S. dollar retaliation limit would be afforded to Canada in response to the expected * billion U.S. dollars in lost steel exports and *** billion U.S. dollars in lost aluminum exports if the tariffs were to be imposed.

Explore Trump's announcement of new 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, marking a significant shift in US trade policy.

Global trade data of Trump under 39219090, 39219090 global trade data, trade data of Trump from 80+ Countries.

This data package includes the underlying data to replicate the charts, tables, and calculations presented in The US Revenue Implications of President Trump’s 2025 Tariffs, PIIE Briefing 25-2.

If you use the data, please cite as:

McKibbin, Warwick, and Geoffrey Shuetrim. 2025. The US Revenue Implications of President Trump’s 2025 Tariffs. PIIE Briefing 25-2. Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

President Trump announces a strategy to lower U.S. drug prices by aligning them with international rates, potentially using trade policies to enforce compliance.

Trump’s renewed tariffs on China are shaking up global trade. Here’s what they could mean for Australian industries facing shifting demand, prices and supply chains.

This data package includes the underlying data and files to replicate the calculations, charts, and tables presented in Trump ended WTO dispute settlement. Trade remedies are needed to fix it, PIIE Working Paper 22-1.

If you use the data, please cite as: Bown, Chad P. (2022). Trump ended WTO dispute settlement. Trade remedies are needed to fix it., PIIE Working Paper 22-1. Peterson Institute for International Economics.

This statistic provides an estimate of the projected change in import and export volumes resulting from the Trump Administration's trade tariffs on steel and aluminum in 2018, by sector. Steel imports are projected to fall by **** percent as result of the administration's tariffs and subsequent retaliation measures by trading partners.

4058 Global import shipment records of Aluminium Trump with prices, volume & current Buyer's suppliers relationships based on actual Global export trade database.

In response to President Trump’s escalation of trade relations, China countered by issuing tariffs on over 6,000 products worth over $110 billion in U.S. exports. We explore whether China’s tariffs reflected a strategy to apply counter-pressure by hurting political support for Republicans, assess the strategy’s impact on the 2018 mid-term elections, and examine the mechanism underlying the resulting electoral shift. We find strong evidence that Chinese tariffs systematically targeted U.S. goods whose production is concentrated in Republican-supporting counties, particularly when located in closely contested Congressional districts. This apparent strategy was successful: targeted areas were more likely to turn against Republican candidates. Using data on campaign communications, local search patterns online and an original national survey, we find evidence that voters residing in areas vulnerable to the tariffs were more likely to learn about the trade war, recognize its adverse impact, and assign the Republicans responsibility for the escalating situation.

President Trump criticizes the automotive trade imbalance with Japan, increasing tariffs on Japanese goods. Treasury Secretary Bessent's visit to Japan aligns with significant political events.

As the second Trump presidency pushes tariffs to their highest levels in a century, some industries are especially impacted by coinciding retaliatory tariffs.