ward_cot displays the six city council districts in the City of Tucson. Ward area legal boundaries are based on Pima County voting precinct legal boundaries. Last updated September 19, 2023.PurposeShows the six wards of the City of Tucson and the respective councilmembers elected them.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 - OpenKnown Uses--Known Errors--Data ContactCity of Tucson Information Technology Department, GIS Services, GIS_IT@tucsonaz.govUpdate FrequencyUpdated as new annexation or redistricting occurs.

Use this tool to view maps and comparative statistics of the main indicators from the Poverty and Urban Stress Report: poverty, income, crime, race and education. See how the data vary across wards in Tucson and zoom in on areas of interest to you.This Story Map compiles multiple map-based dashboards to show statistics on income, poverty, education, and race by ward across Tucson. Users can use the ward filters at the top of each dashboard to view just the ward they are interested in, or compare one ward to another. Each map is interactive: when individual census tracts are selected, users get details about that tract and how it compares to the rest of the ward or county. Data for the maps and graphs are from American Community Survey, which has been apportioned by ward using ESRI's summarize within tool.

This dataset represents Fire Taxation Districts in Pima County. These districts outline areas where property taxes are levied to support fire protection services, excluding certain areas such as tribal fire districts, non-taxed Federal, State, or Pima County properties, and cities without separate fire taxation districts. For example, the City of Tucson and the City of South Tucson do not have distinct fire taxation districts and are not included in this dataset.

Examples of features mapped in this layer include:

Taxed Fire District Boundaries Non-taxed Federal, State, or County properties excluded from certain fire districts

For more information, visit the Pima County Fire Taxation Districts Metadata.

Purpose To provide geographic information on fire taxation districts within Pima County, aiding in tax management and fire service planning.

Dataset Classification Level 0 – Open

Known Uses Used for taxation management, fire service planning, and public information purposes.

Known Errors

Fire taxation districts do not necessarily align with fire service areas, e.g., areas serviced by the Rural/Metro Corporation are excluded.
The City of Tucson and the City of South Tucson are not included as they do not have separate fire taxation districts.
Tribal fire districts are excluded from this dataset.
District boundaries may not be precise, and updates rely on annexation updates from the Assessor's data.

Data Contact Pima Countygisdata@pima.gov

Publisher Contact Information Technology Department GIS_IT@tucsonaz.gov

Update Frequency Updates are dependent on Assessor's data and annexation updates.

Status: UPDATED occasionally using ArcMap Contact: Allen Scully for dissolved version: allen.scully@tucsonaz.govJesse Reyes for original, non-dissolved data. City of Tucson Development Services, 520-837-6963, Jesse.Reyes@tucsonaz.gov Intended Use: For map display. Supplemental Information: An overlay zone typically imposes a set of requirements in addition to those laid out by the underlying zoning regulations in the Land Use Code (LUC). The exact boundaries of the IID overlay are identified on the official zoning maps kept on file in the offices of the Planning and Development Services Department and the City Clerks. Changes triggered by Mayor and Council amendments to Land Use Code. Links:http://www.tucsoncommercial.com/images/Tucson_Zoning_Summary.pdfhttp://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/imported/maps/city/infillincentivedistmaterial.pdf 6/6/2011 - BAE - deleted IIS_CODE field, not used and was getting out of sync with the NAME fieldDecember 2010 - J. Reyes added subdistrict polygon 10/05/2010 - split into two subdistricts per ordinance 10841 03/23/2010 - Name change. Formerly known as infill_incentive 09/15/2009 - Modified per direction from mayor and council09/09/2009 - Modified as per ordinance 10710 10/24/2006 - Defined by resolution 204487

.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipiscing elit. Massa enim nec dui nunc. Quis commodo odio aenean sed adipiscing diam donec adipiscing. Nulla pellentesque dignissim enim sit amet venenatis urna. Sit amet volutpat consequat mauris nunc congue nisi vitae. Fames ac turpis egestas maecenas pharetra convallis posuere morbi leo. Morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis. Eget lorem dolor sed viverra ipsum nunc. Id ornare arcu odio ut sem. Morbi leo urna molestie at elementum eu. In metus vulputate eu scelerisque. Lobortis mattis aliquam faucibus purus in massa tempor nec feugiat. Ut sem viverra aliquet eget sit amet tellus cras adipiscing. Lobortis mattis aliquam faucibus purus in massa tempor. Donec massa sapien faucibus et molestie ac feugiat. Et odio pellentesque diam volutpat commodo sed egestas egestas. Pharetra magna ac placerat vestibulum lectus. Fermentum leo vel orci porta non pulvinar neque laoreet suspendisseExamples of features mapped in this layer include:City Ward boundariesPurposeLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Dataset TypePolygonDefinition QueriesNoneSpecial ThemingNoneDataset ClassificationLevel 0 – OpenKnown UsesLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Known ErrorsLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Data ContactInformation Technology DepartmentGIS_IT@tucsonaz.govPublisher ContactInformation Technology DepartmentGIS_IT@tucsonaz.govUpdate FrequencyAs Needed

Plan submitted by: redistrictadmin on 12/8/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: In this version based off CD Test Map Version 8.0, CD Test Map Version 8.3 looks to replicate the boundaries of District 22 and 23 of the Yuma Gold map to District 7 and District 9. CD Test Map Version 8.3 also offers an alternative boundary change in Tucson and balancing method from CD Test Map Version 8.1.

USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: N/A

Plan submitted by: AZ71@22 on 11/13/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: This LD map focuses on compromise in Southern AZ. It creates regional communities of interest in contiguous districts based on feedback from the public meetings. USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: PLEASE LOOK AT THIS MAP. This LD map is about compromise in Southern AZ.

MEHL: He gets his wish to keep Marana, Oro Valley, Saddlebrook I & II and Red Rock in Pinal County together in one D17 district.

LERNER: She successfully separates Tanque Verde and Houghton Corridor from NW Tucson to add to the D18 district of Tucson.

PUBLIC COMMENTS: The people of Santa Cruz County keep their county in one district and the communities of Green Valley, Quail Creek and Sahuarita are added entirely to D21 and remain consolidated along with Amado, Tubac & Tumacacori.

ADDITIONAL BENEFIT: The growing region of D16 in the central AZ region of the I-8/I-10 split becomes very competitive in this map version with Maricopa, Casa Grande, Arizona City staying as one entity since those cities have their own growth objective separate from Tucson and Phx.

Thank you. I really feel this map addresses everyone's issues fairly with near perfect population distribution, contiguous districts, supports communities of interest, and makes logical compromises the public is asking for.

Plan submitted by: redistrictadmin on 10/26/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: In this version based off LD Test Map Version 8.0, LD Test Map Version 9.1 looks to move Flowing Wells into District 20. All of Red Rock and Vail are moved into District 17, while Tucson Estates, Oracle, Sane Manuel, and Mammoth move into District 16. The Davis-Monthan Air Base is moved into District 21, and Quail Creek Country Club, Amado, Tubac, and the eastern half of Santa Cruz County are moved into District 19. Finally, all of Coolidge is united in District 16, and District 7 moves further west into Apache Junction. USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: N/A

Plan submitted by: redistrictadmin on 12/9/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: In this version based off CD Test Map Version 8.1, CD Test Map Version 9.1 centralizes District 1 within the Loop 101 and brings the District 7 border further west into Tucson. USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: N/A