9 datasets found
  1. m

    Time Use Survey (TUS), January 2019-December 2019 - India

    • microdata.gov.in
    Updated Dec 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    NSSO (2024). Time Use Survey (TUS), January 2019-December 2019 - India [Dataset]. https://microdata.gov.in/NADA/index.php/catalog/223
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 19, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    NSSO
    Area covered
    India
    Description

    Abstract

    National Statistical Office (NSO) in India conducted the first Time Use Survey during January – December 2019. The survey measures the participation rate and time spent on paid activities, care activities, unpaid activities, etc.

    The primary objective of Time Use Survey (TUS) is to measure participation of men and women in paid and unpaid activities. TUS is an important source of information on the time spent in unpaid caregiving activities, volunteer work, unpaid domestic service producing activities of the household members. It also provides information on time spent on learning, socializing, leisure activities, self-care activities, etc., by the household members.

    The Time Use Survey, 2019 has the following features:

    (i) In this survey, information on activity particulars was collected for each household member of age 6 years and above, with a reference period of 24 hours starting from 4:00 AM on the day before the date of interview to 4:00 AM on the day of the interview. The reference period of 24 hours was split into 48 time slots, each of duration of 30 minutes.

    (ii) The Information on time use for the reference period was collected through personal interview from the persons of age 6 years and above of the selected households.

    (iii)Respondents were asked about their activities performed in the designated time slots and the same was recorded against the corresponding slot. In case of multiple activities in a time slot the activities which were performed for 10 minutes or more were recorded.

    (iv) The activities reported by the respondents, were codified (3-digit code) following the International Classification of Activities for Time Use Statistics 2016 (ICATUS 2016).The cla ssification is referred to as TUS activity classification in this Report. The code structure and description of the 3-digit code of the TUS activity classification are given in Annexure in Chapter Two.

    (v) Determination of activity performed in a day and time spent in a day in that activity have been done in the following ways:

    a. Considering only the major activity in a time slot: While considering only the major activity in a time slot, the entire duration of the time in that time slot has been allotted to the major activity and the major activity was considered as the activity performed in that time slot.

    b. Considering all the activities in a time slot: While considering all the activities performed in a time slot, the entire duration of time in a time slot has been assigned among the activities in a time slot in the following ways:

    If in a time slot only one activity was performed, the entire duration of that time slot was allotted against that activity.

    If in a time slot more than one activity was performed, the entire duration of that time slot was allotted equally among the activities performed in that time slot.

    Geographic coverage

    The survey covered the whole of the Indian Union except the villages in Andaman and Nicobar Islands which are difficult to access.

    Sampling procedure

    In Time Use Survey (TUS), a rural village was notionally divided into a number of subunits (SU) of more or less equal population during the preparation of frame. Census 2011 population of villages was projected by applying suitable growth rates and the number of SUs formed in a village was determined apriori. The above procedure of SU formation was implemented in the villages with population more than or equal to 1000 as per Census 2011. In the remaining villages, no SU was formed. SUs were formed in urban sector also. The procedure was similar to that adopted in rural areas except that SUs were formed on the basis of households in the Urban Frame Survey (UFS) frame instead of population, since UFS frame does not have population. Each UFS block with number of households more than or equal to 250 was divided into a number of SUs. In the remaining UFS blocks, no SU was formed.

    A stratified two stage design was adopted for the TUS. The first stage units (FSU) were villages/UFS blocks/sub-units (SUs) as per the situation. The ultimate stage units (USU) were households in both the sectors.

    In the rural areas, stratification was made as follows: (a) all inhabited villages within each NSS State region constituted a rural stratum and (b) a special stratum, in the rural areas only, was formed at all-India level before the strata are formed in each State/UT. This stratum comprised all the uninhabited villages as per Census 2011 belonging to allStates/U Ts. In urban areas strata were formed within each NSS State region on the basis of size class of towns as per Census 2011.

    Sub-Stratification in rural areas: In rural areas, three groups of villages were formed within each stratum (except special rural stratum) as follows: Group 1: all villages (Panchayat wards for Kerala) with Census 2011 population less than 250 Group 2: all villages (Panchayat wards for Kerala) with Census 2011 population more than or equal to 250 but less than 500 Group 3: remaining villages

    The sample size for a rural stratum was allocated among 3 groups in proportion to Census population. Sub-strata was demarcated in Group 1, Group 2 and Group 3 respectively in such a way that each sub-stratum comprises a group of villages (all SUs of a village considered together) of the arranged frame and have more or less equal Census population within the respective group.

    Sub-Stratification in urban areas: Sub-strata were demarcated in such a way that eachsub-stratum comprised a group of UFS blocks (all SUs within the block taken together)having more or less equal number of households.

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

  2. m

    Time Use Survey (TUS), January 2024-December 2024 - India

    • microdata.gov.in
    Updated Apr 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    NSSO (2025). Time Use Survey (TUS), January 2024-December 2024 - India [Dataset]. https://microdata.gov.in/NADA/index.php/catalog/236
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 15, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    NSSO
    Area covered
    India
    Description

    Abstract

    Time Use Survey (TUS) provides a framework for measuring time dispositions by the population on different activities. One distinguishing feature of Time Use Survey from other household surveys is that it can capture time disposition on different aspects of human activities, be it paid, unpaid or other activities with such details which is otherwise not possible in other surveys. In recent years, time use surveys have gained much impetus among policy makers and other data users for their usefulness in measuring various aspects of gender statistics. National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) in India conducted the first Time Use Survey during January - December 2019. The second Time Use Survey will be conducted during January -December 2024.

    Objective of the survey

    The primary objective of Time Use Survey (TUS) is to measure participation of persons in paid and unpaid activities. The survey will be an important source of information on the time spent in unpaid caregiving activities, unpaid volunteer work, unpaid domestic service producing activities of the household members. This will also provide information on time spent on learning, socializing, leisure activities, self-care activities, etc. by the household members.

    Geographic coverage

    The survey covers whole of the Indian Union except the villages in Andaman and Nicobar Islands which are difficult to access.

    Analysis unit

    Unit of survey: The first stage unit (FSU) is the village/UFS block/SU depending on the sampling frame.

    Sampling procedure

    In Time Use Survey (TUS), a rural village was notionally divided into a number of subunits (SU) of more or less equal population during the preparation of frame. Census 2011 population of villages was projected by applying suitable growth rates and the number of SUs formed in a village was determined apriori. The above procedure of SU formation was implemented in the villages with population more than or equal to 1000 as per Census 2011. In the remaining villages, no SU was formed. SUs were formed in urban sector also. The procedure was similar to that adopted in rural areas except that SUs were formed on the basis of households in the Urban Frame Survey (UFS) frame instead of population, since UFS frame does not have population. Each UFS block with number of households more than or equal to 250 was divided into a number of SUs. In the remaining UFS blocks, no SU was formed.

    A stratified two stage design was adopted for the TUS. The first stage units (FSU) were villages/UFS blocks/sub-units (SUs) as per the situation. The ultimate stage units (USU) were households in both the sectors.

    In the rural areas, stratification was made as follows: (a) all inhabited villages within each NSS State region constituted a rural stratum and (b) a special stratum, in the rural areas only, was formed at all-India level before the strata are formed in each State/UT. This stratum comprised all the uninhabited villages as per Census 2011 belonging to allStates/U Ts. In urban areas strata were formed within each NSS State region on the basis of size class of towns as per Census 2011.

    Sub-Stratification in rural areas: In rural areas, three groups of villages were formed within each stratum (except special rural stratum) as follows: Group 1: all villages (Panchayat wards for Kerala) with Census 2011 population less than 250 Group 2: all villages (Panchayat wards for Kerala) with Census 2011 population more than or equal to 250 but less than 500 Group 3: remaining villages

    The sample size for a rural stratum was allocated among 3 groups in proportion to Census population. Sub-strata was demarcated in Group 1, Group 2 and Group 3 respectively in such a way that each sub-stratum comprises a group of villages (all SUs of a village considered together) of the arranged frame and have more or less equal Census population within the respective group.

    Sub-Stratification in urban areas: Sub-strata were demarcated in such a way that each sub-stratum comprised a group of UFS blocks (all SUs within the block taken together)having more or less equal number of households.

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

  3. United States Employment: NF: WW: TU: RT: Gasoline Stations & Fuel Dealers

    • ceicdata.com
    Updated Feb 19, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com (2023). United States Employment: NF: WW: TU: RT: Gasoline Stations & Fuel Dealers [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/united-states/current-employment-statistics-survey-employment-women-worker-non-farm-payroll/employment-nf-ww-tu-rt-gasoline-stations--fuel-dealers
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 19, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    CEIC Data
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Feb 1, 2024 - Jan 1, 2025
    Area covered
    United States
    Variables measured
    Employment
    Description

    United States Employment: NF: WW: TU: RT: Gasoline Stations & Fuel Dealers data was reported at 526.900 Person th in Mar 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 527.000 Person th for Feb 2025. United States Employment: NF: WW: TU: RT: Gasoline Stations & Fuel Dealers data is updated monthly, averaging 520.600 Person th from Jan 1990 (Median) to Mar 2025, with 423 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 566.000 Person th in Jun 2019 and a record low of 420.600 Person th in Mar 1990. United States Employment: NF: WW: TU: RT: Gasoline Stations & Fuel Dealers data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.G064: Current Employment Statistics: Employment: Women Worker: Non Farm Payroll.

  4. f

    Table_1_Regional and social disparities in cessation behavior and motivation...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Oct 30, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Candon Johnson; Jose Martinez (2024). Table_1_Regional and social disparities in cessation behavior and motivation to quit among U.S. adult current smokers, Tobacco Use Supplement to the U.S. Census Bureau's Current Population Survey 2014–15 and 2018–19.DOCX [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1416096.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 30, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Candon Johnson; Jose Martinez
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    IntroductionVariation in smoking cessation behaviors and motivators across the United States may contribute to health disparities. This study investigates regional differences over time in two key cessation motivators (quit interest and doctor's advice to quit) and two cessation behaviors (past-year quit attempts and recent successful cessation) across diverse demographic factors.MethodsData were analyzed from two releases of the Tobacco Use Supplement to the U.S. Census Bureau's Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS) for the years 2014–15 and 2018–19. The analysis included sex, age, race and ethnicity, education, marital status, employment status, and household income.ResultsFindings from 2018 to 2019 TUS-CPS revealed that quit interest was highest in the Northeast and lowest in the Midwest, while doctor's advice to quit was most prevalent in the Northeast and least in the West. Past-year quit attempts were most common in the Northeast and least in the South. Recent successful cessation (defined as quitting for 6 to 12 months) was highest in the Northeast and Midwest, with the South showing the lowest rates. Compared to the 2014–15 survey, 14 demographic groups (7 in the Midwest, 6 in the South, and 1 in the West) showed decreases in both quit interest and actions to quit. Notably, the Asian non-Hispanic group in the Northeast experienced a significant decrease in quit interest (–17.9%) but an increase in recent successful cessation (+369.2%).DiscussionOverall, the study indicates that while quit interest was highest in the West, the South exhibited the lowest rates of quit attempts and successful cessation. Significant differences were also noted between age groups. These findings highlight the need for further research into cessation behaviors at more granular levels to inform policies aimed at reducing smoking-related health disparities among populations facing the greatest challenges in cessation.

  5. l

    Data and R code for PhD Thesis by Chi T. U. Le (2019)

    • opal.latrobe.edu.au
    • researchdata.edu.au
    zip
    Updated May 13, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Chi Le; Warren Paul; Phil Suter; Ben Gawne (2024). Data and R code for PhD Thesis by Chi T. U. Le (2019) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.26181/5c81d1172806d
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 13, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    La Trobe
    Authors
    Chi Le; Warren Paul; Phil Suter; Ben Gawne
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Data and R code used in L, C. T. U (2019). Using Causal Modelling Principles to Integrate Long-term Macroinvertebrate Monitoring Data for the Murray River with an Existing Hydroclimate-Salinity Model for the Murray-Darling Basin to Predict the Ecohydrological Effects of Future Climate Scenarios. Unpublished PhD thesis. La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.

  6. A

    Puntos Cuida tu Salud, 2019 - 2020

    • data.amerigeoss.org
    csv, ods, xlsx
    Updated Aug 8, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dominican Republic (2022). Puntos Cuida tu Salud, 2019 - 2020 [Dataset]. https://data.amerigeoss.org/th/dataset/puntos-de-salud-digepep
    Explore at:
    ods, xlsx, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 8, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Dominican Republic
    License

    Open Database License (ODbL) v1.0https://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Este conjunto de datos contiene el listado de los puntos Cuida tu Salud de la Dirección General de Proyectos Estratégicos y Especiales de la Presidencia (PROPEEP), en funcionamiento en el periodo 2020, en el que se puede encontrar su ubicación, horario en el que funciona y posición geográfica.

  7. TU RAB 2019

    • data.jatengprov.go.id
    Updated Oct 10, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja (2022). TU RAB 2019 [Dataset]. https://data.jatengprov.go.id/dataset/tu-rab-2019
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 10, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Polisi Pamong Praja
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    TU RAB 2019

  8. TU 2019 POL PP

    • data.jatengprov.go.id
    Updated Oct 10, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja (2022). TU 2019 POL PP [Dataset]. https://data.jatengprov.go.id/dataset/tu-2019-pol-pp
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 10, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Polisi Pamong Praja
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    TU 2019 POL PP

  9. United States Employment: NF: WW: TU: TW: Transit & Ground Passenger Transpo...

    • ceicdata.com
    Updated Feb 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com (2025). United States Employment: NF: WW: TU: TW: Transit & Ground Passenger Transpo [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/united-states/current-employment-statistics-survey-employment-women-worker-non-farm-payroll/employment-nf-ww-tu-tw-transit--ground-passenger-transpo
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 15, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    CEIC Data
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Feb 1, 2024 - Jan 1, 2025
    Area covered
    United States
    Variables measured
    Employment
    Description

    United States Employment: NF: WW: TU: TW: Transit & Ground Passenger Transpo data was reported at 206.600 Person th in Mar 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 206.900 Person th for Feb 2025. United States Employment: NF: WW: TU: TW: Transit & Ground Passenger Transpo data is updated monthly, averaging 156.300 Person th from Jan 1990 (Median) to Mar 2025, with 423 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 210.000 Person th in Dec 2019 and a record low of 61.600 Person th in Aug 1990. United States Employment: NF: WW: TU: TW: Transit & Ground Passenger Transpo data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.G064: Current Employment Statistics: Employment: Women Worker: Non Farm Payroll.

  10. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
NSSO (2024). Time Use Survey (TUS), January 2019-December 2019 - India [Dataset]. https://microdata.gov.in/NADA/index.php/catalog/223

Time Use Survey (TUS), January 2019-December 2019 - India

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Dec 19, 2024
Dataset authored and provided by
NSSO
Area covered
India
Description

Abstract

National Statistical Office (NSO) in India conducted the first Time Use Survey during January – December 2019. The survey measures the participation rate and time spent on paid activities, care activities, unpaid activities, etc.

The primary objective of Time Use Survey (TUS) is to measure participation of men and women in paid and unpaid activities. TUS is an important source of information on the time spent in unpaid caregiving activities, volunteer work, unpaid domestic service producing activities of the household members. It also provides information on time spent on learning, socializing, leisure activities, self-care activities, etc., by the household members.

The Time Use Survey, 2019 has the following features:

(i) In this survey, information on activity particulars was collected for each household member of age 6 years and above, with a reference period of 24 hours starting from 4:00 AM on the day before the date of interview to 4:00 AM on the day of the interview. The reference period of 24 hours was split into 48 time slots, each of duration of 30 minutes.

(ii) The Information on time use for the reference period was collected through personal interview from the persons of age 6 years and above of the selected households.

(iii)Respondents were asked about their activities performed in the designated time slots and the same was recorded against the corresponding slot. In case of multiple activities in a time slot the activities which were performed for 10 minutes or more were recorded.

(iv) The activities reported by the respondents, were codified (3-digit code) following the International Classification of Activities for Time Use Statistics 2016 (ICATUS 2016).The cla ssification is referred to as TUS activity classification in this Report. The code structure and description of the 3-digit code of the TUS activity classification are given in Annexure in Chapter Two.

(v) Determination of activity performed in a day and time spent in a day in that activity have been done in the following ways:

a. Considering only the major activity in a time slot: While considering only the major activity in a time slot, the entire duration of the time in that time slot has been allotted to the major activity and the major activity was considered as the activity performed in that time slot.

b. Considering all the activities in a time slot: While considering all the activities performed in a time slot, the entire duration of time in a time slot has been assigned among the activities in a time slot in the following ways:

If in a time slot only one activity was performed, the entire duration of that time slot was allotted against that activity.

If in a time slot more than one activity was performed, the entire duration of that time slot was allotted equally among the activities performed in that time slot.

Geographic coverage

The survey covered the whole of the Indian Union except the villages in Andaman and Nicobar Islands which are difficult to access.

Sampling procedure

In Time Use Survey (TUS), a rural village was notionally divided into a number of subunits (SU) of more or less equal population during the preparation of frame. Census 2011 population of villages was projected by applying suitable growth rates and the number of SUs formed in a village was determined apriori. The above procedure of SU formation was implemented in the villages with population more than or equal to 1000 as per Census 2011. In the remaining villages, no SU was formed. SUs were formed in urban sector also. The procedure was similar to that adopted in rural areas except that SUs were formed on the basis of households in the Urban Frame Survey (UFS) frame instead of population, since UFS frame does not have population. Each UFS block with number of households more than or equal to 250 was divided into a number of SUs. In the remaining UFS blocks, no SU was formed.

A stratified two stage design was adopted for the TUS. The first stage units (FSU) were villages/UFS blocks/sub-units (SUs) as per the situation. The ultimate stage units (USU) were households in both the sectors.

In the rural areas, stratification was made as follows: (a) all inhabited villages within each NSS State region constituted a rural stratum and (b) a special stratum, in the rural areas only, was formed at all-India level before the strata are formed in each State/UT. This stratum comprised all the uninhabited villages as per Census 2011 belonging to allStates/U Ts. In urban areas strata were formed within each NSS State region on the basis of size class of towns as per Census 2011.

Sub-Stratification in rural areas: In rural areas, three groups of villages were formed within each stratum (except special rural stratum) as follows: Group 1: all villages (Panchayat wards for Kerala) with Census 2011 population less than 250 Group 2: all villages (Panchayat wards for Kerala) with Census 2011 population more than or equal to 250 but less than 500 Group 3: remaining villages

The sample size for a rural stratum was allocated among 3 groups in proportion to Census population. Sub-strata was demarcated in Group 1, Group 2 and Group 3 respectively in such a way that each sub-stratum comprises a group of villages (all SUs of a village considered together) of the arranged frame and have more or less equal Census population within the respective group.

Sub-Stratification in urban areas: Sub-strata were demarcated in such a way that eachsub-stratum comprised a group of UFS blocks (all SUs within the block taken together)having more or less equal number of households.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu