twitter.com is ranked #10 in JP with 1.11B Traffic. Categories: Newspapers, Online Services. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

In March 2024, X's web page Twitter.com had *** billion website visits worldwide, up from *** billion site visits the previous month. Formerly known as Twitter, X is a microblogging and social networking service that allows most of its users to write short posts with a maximum of 280 characters.

In the six months ending March 2024, the United States accounted for 23.21 percent of web traffic to the Twitter.com URL. Japan ranked second, accounting for 16.06 percent of traffic to the web page, and was followed by the United Kingdom, representing 5.51 percent of the web address online volume.

Traffic analytics, rankings, and competitive metrics for twitter.com as of June 2025

Author: Víctor Yeste. Universitat Politècnica de Valencia.The object of this study is the design of a cybermetric methodology whose objectives are to measure the success of the content published in online media and the possible prediction of the selected success variables.In this case, due to the need to integrate data from two separate areas, such as web publishing and the analysis of their shares and related topics on Twitter, has opted for programming as you access both the Google Analytics v4 reporting API and Twitter Standard API, always respecting the limits of these.The website analyzed is hellofriki.com. It is an online media whose primary intention is to solve the need for information on some topics that provide daily a vast number of news in the form of news, as well as the possibility of analysis, reports, interviews, and many other information formats. All these contents are under the scope of the sections of cinema, series, video games, literature, and comics.This dataset has contributed to the elaboration of the PhD Thesis:Yeste Moreno, VM. (2021). Diseño de una metodología cibermétrica de cálculo del éxito para la optimización de contenidos web [Tesis doctoral]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/176009Data have been obtained from each last-minute news article published online according to the indicators described in the doctoral thesis. All related data are stored in a database, divided into the following tables:tesis_followers: User ID list of media account followers.tesis_hometimeline: data from tweets posted by the media account sharing breaking news from the web.status_id: Tweet IDcreated_at: date of publicationtext: content of the tweetpath: URL extracted after processing the shortened URL in textpost_shared: Article ID in WordPress that is being sharedretweet_count: number of retweetsfavorite_count: number of favoritestesis_hometimeline_other: data from tweets posted by the media account that do not share breaking news from the web. Other typologies, automatic Facebook shares, custom tweets without link to an article, etc. With the same fields as tesis_hometimeline.tesis_posts: data of articles published by the web and processed for some analysis.stats_id: Analysis IDpost_id: Article ID in WordPresspost_date: article publication date in WordPresspost_title: title of the articlepath: URL of the article in the middle webtags: Tags ID or WordPress tags related to the articleuniquepageviews: unique page viewsentrancerate: input ratioavgtimeonpage: average visit timeexitrate: output ratiopageviewspersession: page views per sessionadsense_adunitsviewed: number of ads viewed by usersadsense_viewableimpressionpercent: ad display ratioadsense_ctr: ad click ratioadsense_ecpm: estimated ad revenue per 1000 page viewstesis_stats: data from a particular analysis, performed at each published breaking news item. Fields with statistical values can be computed from the data in the other tables, but total and average calculations are saved for faster and easier further processing.id: ID of the analysisphase: phase of the thesis in which analysis has been carried out (right now all are 1)time: "0" if at the time of publication, "1" if 14 days laterstart_date: date and time of measurement on the day of publicationend_date: date and time when the measurement is made 14 days latermain_post_id: ID of the published article to be analysedmain_post_theme: Main section of the published article to analyzesuperheroes_theme: "1" if about superheroes, "0" if nottrailer_theme: "1" if trailer, "0" if notname: empty field, possibility to add a custom name manuallynotes: empty field, possibility to add personalized notes manually, as if some tag has been removed manually for being considered too generic, despite the fact that the editor put itnum_articles: number of articles analysednum_articles_with_traffic: number of articles analysed with traffic (which will be taken into account for traffic analysis)num_articles_with_tw_data: number of articles with data from when they were shared on the media’s Twitter accountnum_terms: number of terms analyzeduniquepageviews_total: total page viewsuniquepageviews_mean: average page viewsentrancerate_mean: average input ratioavgtimeonpage_mean: average duration of visitsexitrate_mean: average output ratiopageviewspersession_mean: average page views per sessiontotal: total of ads viewedadsense_adunitsviewed_mean: average of ads viewedadsense_viewableimpressionpercent_mean: average ad display ratioadsense_ctr_mean: average ad click ratioadsense_ecpm_mean: estimated ad revenue per 1000 page viewsTotal: total incomeretweet_count_mean: average incomefavorite_count_total: total of favoritesfavorite_count_mean: average of favoritesterms_ini_num_tweets: total tweets on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_retweet_count_total: total retweets on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_retweet_count_mean: average retweets on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_favorite_count_total: total of favorites on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_favorite_count_mean: average of favorites on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_followers_talking_rate: ratio of followers of the media Twitter account who have recently published a tweet talking about the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_user_num_followers_mean: average followers of users who have spoken of the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_user_num_tweets_mean: average number of tweets published by users who spoke about the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_user_age_mean: average age in days of users who have spoken of the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_ur_inclusion_rate: URL inclusion ratio of tweets talking about terms on the day of publicationterms_end_num_tweets: total tweets on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_retweet_count_total: total retweets on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_retweet_count_mean: average retweets on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_favorite_count_total: total bookmarks on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_favorite_count_mean: average of favorites on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_followers_talking_rate: ratio of media Twitter account followers who have recently posted a tweet talking about the terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_user_num_followers_mean: average followers of users who have spoken of the terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_user_num_tweets_mean: average number of tweets published by users who have spoken about the terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_user_age_mean: the average age in days of users who have spoken of the terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_ur_inclusion_rate: URL inclusion ratio of tweets talking about terms 14 days after publication.tesis_terms: data of the terms (tags) related to the processed articles.stats_id: Analysis IDtime: "0" if at the time of publication, "1" if 14 days laterterm_id: Term ID (tag) in WordPressname: Name of the termslug: URL of the termnum_tweets: number of tweetsretweet_count_total: total retweetsretweet_count_mean: average retweetsfavorite_count_total: total of favoritesfavorite_count_mean: average of favoritesfollowers_talking_rate: ratio of followers of the media Twitter account who have recently published a tweet talking about the termuser_num_followers_mean: average followers of users who were talking about the termuser_num_tweets_mean: average number of tweets published by users who were talking about the termuser_age_mean: average age in days of users who were talking about the termurl_inclusion_rate: URL inclusion ratio

Social network X/Twitter is particularly popular in the United States, and as of February 2025, the microblogging service had an audience reach of 103.9 million users in the country. Japan and the India were ranked second and third with more than 70 million and 25 million users respectively. Global Twitter usage As of the second quarter of 2021, X/Twitter had 206 million monetizable daily active users worldwide. The most-followed Twitter accounts include figures such as Elon Musk, Justin Bieber and former U.S. president Barack Obama. X/Twitter and politics X/Twitter has become an increasingly relevant tool in domestic and international politics. The platform has become a way to promote policies and interact with citizens and other officials, and most world leaders and foreign ministries have an official Twitter account. Former U.S. president Donald Trump used to be a prolific Twitter user before the platform permanently suspended his account in January 2021. During an August 2018 survey, 61 percent of respondents stated that Trump's use of Twitter as President of the United States was inappropriate.

twitter-thread.com is ranked #74415 in IN with 142.13K Traffic. Categories: . Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

Updated daily

twitter-video-download.com is ranked #356805 in US with 42.07K Traffic. Categories: Online Services. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

As of December 2022, X/Twitter's audience accounted for over *** million monthly active users worldwide. This figure was projected to ******** to approximately *** million by 2024, a ******* of around **** percent compared to 2022.

The number of Twitter users in France was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2028 by in total *** million users (+**** percent). After the ninth consecutive increasing year, the Twitter user base is estimated to reach ***** million users and therefore a new peak in 2028. Notably, the number of Twitter users of was continuously increasing over the past years.User figures, shown here regarding the platform twitter, have been estimated by taking into account company filings or press material, secondary research, app downloads and traffic data. They refer to the average monthly active users over the period.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to *** countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).Find more key insights for the number of Twitter users in countries like Luxembourg and Netherlands.

Twitter is ranked as the 12h most popular social media site in the world. The platform currently has 611 million active monthly users.

Context

This dataset is taken from the real task of Tweeter scraping.

The task is aimed to build models that determine the NLP-sentiment (neutral, positive, negative) of the text. To do this, you will need to train the model on the existing data (tweets_joebiden.csv). The resulted model will have to determine the class (neutral, positive, negative).

Content

The dataset conisits three columns; namely, ID, Text, and Created at. These columns represent the scraped tweets which ware scraped based on the keyword "joebiden".

Acknowledgem

This dataset would not be collected without the support I got from Tweeter, and warm appreciation to Amal AlZamel who helped me in satisfying the Tweeter's API requirements.

QAP regressions for popular websites (Alexa)/ videos (YouTube)/ topics (Twitter) similarity across countries (Final block, September).

1 Classification Dataset

This dataset for the classification model contains 3,804 tweets, where 1,902 are related to traffic accident reports (TA, positive class) and 1,902 are unrelated (NTA, negative class).

For training the tweet classification model, a collaborative labeling strategy was designed. Here, 30 people labeled data according to the instructions given. Each participant had to evaluate a tweet to manually classify it into one of three categories defined as: traffic accident related, unrelated and don´t know/no response. Each tweet was evaluated by 3 participants. The correct label was selected by voting; the 3 people must agree on the selected label, otherwise the tweet was excluded from training. This process took a month and required the development and deployment of a web application.

2 NER Dataset (Named Entity Recognition)

For the entity recognition model training, a sample of the filtered tweets resulting from the previous classification phase was taken. 1,340 tweets were extracted, where 800 are from “unofficial” users, almost 60% of the sample. These tweets were user reports on traffic incident occurred in Bogota from October 2018 to July 2019, including other tweets that contained some location references such as reports on the state of road infrastructure; some tweets from the years 2016 and 2017 were also included. Although these posts were not related to accidents per se, they were selected because they contained location information. The purpose was to train a model that would recognize these entities, because a classifier of accident-related tweets was previously created. Additionally, the dataset was split, reserving 1,072 tweets for training and 268 for evaluation.

This dataset was manually labeled using the IOB (Inside-outside- beginning) format. The labeling tool called Brat Annotation Tools was used for this task. The labels defined are Location, which refers to the location of the report; and Time, which refers to the time or date of the incident. Accordingly, 5 labels were generated: B-loc, I-loc, B-time, I-time and O. The O label refers to Others.

3 Traffic accident Twitter geolocation

A dataset with 26362 traffic accident tweets with the coordinates of the incident and the date of publication.

Data extracted from social media platforms are both large in scale and complex in nature, since they contain both unstructured text, as well as structured data, such as time stamps and interactions between users. A key question for such platforms is to determine influential users, in the sense that they generate interactions between members of the platform. Common measures used both in the academic literature and by companies that provide analytics services are variants of the popular web-search PageRank algorithm applied to networks that capture connections between users. In this work, we develop a modeling framework using multivariate interacting counting processes to capture the detailed actions that users undertake on such platforms, namely posting original content, reposting and/or mentioning other users’ postings. Based on the proposed model, we also derive a novel influence measure. We discuss estimation of the model parameters through maximum likelihood and establish their asymptotic properties. The proposed model and the accompanying influence measure are illustrated on a dataset covering a five-year period of the Twitter actions of the members of the U.S. Senate, as well as mainstream news organizations and media personalities. Supplementary material is available online including computer code, data, and derivation details.

As of December 2023, Facebook accounted for over ** percent of the web traffic referrals from social media in Tunisia. YouTube and X (Twitter) followed with shares of * and *** percent, respectively. Web traffic referrals occur when users click or tap on links published on social media platforms, leading to third-party websites.

Descriptive statistics for matrices of Alexa, YouTube, and Twitter (September).

The database includes three datasets. All of them were extracted from a dataset published by X (Twitter Transparency Websites) that includes tweets from malicious accounts trying to manipulate public opinion in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Although the propagandist tweets were published by malicious accounts, as X (Twitter) stated, the tweets at their level were not classified as propaganda or not. Propagandists usually mix propaganda and non-propaganda tweets in an attempt to hide their identities. Therefore, it was necessary to classify their tweets as propaganda or not, based on the propaganda technique used. Since the datasets are very large, we annotated a sample of 2,100 tweets. The datasets are made up of 16,355,558 tweets from propagandist users focused on sports and banking topics.

The TFPsocialmedia dataset offers a comprehensive social media data for understanding Turkish Foreign Policy. Curated tweets capture nuances of political discourse, while the social network structure enables insightful research on public perceptions and foreign policy events. Researchers can employ the dataset to unravel online portrayals of Turkey and explore the utilization of Twitter data in foreign policy analysis. This resource is particularly valuable for scholars seeking a deep dive into the digital dimensions of international relations.