Facebook
TwitterThe purpose of the SNF study was to improve our understanding of the relationship between remotely sensed observations and important biophysical parameters in the boreal forest. A key element of the experiment was the development of methodologies to measure forest stand characteristics to determine values of importance to both remote sensing and ecology. Parameters studied were biomass, leaf area index, above ground net primary productivity, bark area index and ground coverage by vegetation. Thirty two quaking aspen and thirty one black spruce sites were studied. Sites were chosen in uniform stands of aspen or spruce. The dominant species in the site constituted over 80 percent, and usually over 95 percent, of the total tree density and basal area. Aspen stands were chosen to represent the full range of age and stem density of essentially pure aspen, of nearly complete canopy closure, and greater than two meters in height. Spruce stands ranged from very sparse stands on bog sites, to dense, closed stands on more productive peatlands. Use of multiple plots within each site allowed estimation of the importance of spatial variation in stand parameters. Within each plot, all woody stems greater than two meters in height were recorded by species and the following dimensions were measured: diameter breast height, height of the tree, height of the first live branch, and depth of crown. For each plot, a two meter diameter subplot was defined at the center of each plot. Within this subplot, the percent of ground coverage by plants under one meter in height was determined by species. These data, averaged for the five plots in each site, are presented in this data set (i.e., SNF Forest Understory Cover Data (Table)) in tabular format, e.g. plant species with a count for that species at each site. The same data are presented in the SNF Forest Understory Cover Data data set but are arranged with a row for each species and site and a percent ground coverage for each combination.
Facebook
TwitterData files containing detailed information about vehicles in the UK are also available, including make and model data.
Some tables have been withdrawn and replaced. The table index for this statistical series has been updated to provide a full map between the old and new numbering systems used in this page.
The Department for Transport is committed to continuously improving the quality and transparency of our outputs, in line with the Code of Practice for Statistics. In line with this, we have recently concluded a planned review of the processes and methodologies used in the production of Vehicle licensing statistics data. The review sought to seek out and introduce further improvements and efficiencies in the coding technologies we use to produce our data and as part of that, we have identified several historical errors across the published data tables affecting different historical periods. These errors are the result of mistakes in past production processes that we have now identified, corrected and taken steps to eliminate going forward.
Most of the revisions to our published figures are small, typically changing values by less than 1% to 3%. The key revisions are:
Licensed Vehicles (2014 Q3 to 2016 Q3)
We found that some unlicensed vehicles during this period were mistakenly counted as licensed. This caused a slight overstatement, about 0.54% on average, in the number of licensed vehicles during this period.
3.5 - 4.25 tonnes Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEVs) Classification
Since 2023, ZEVs weighing between 3.5 and 4.25 tonnes have been classified as light goods vehicles (LGVs) instead of heavy goods vehicles (HGVs). We have now applied this change to earlier data and corrected an error in table VEH0150. As a result, the number of newly registered HGVs has been reduced by:
3.1% in 2024
2.3% in 2023
1.4% in 2022
Table VEH0156 (2018 to 2023)
Table VEH0156, which reports average CO₂ emissions for newly registered vehicles, has been updated for the years 2018 to 2023. Most changes are minor (under 3%), but the e-NEDC measure saw a larger correction, up to 15.8%, due to a calculation error. Other measures (WLTP and Reported) were less notable, except for April 2020 when COVID-19 led to very few new registrations which led to greater volatility in the resultant percentages.
Neither these specific revisions, nor any of the others introduced, have had a material impact on the statistics overall, the direction of trends nor the key messages that they previously conveyed.
Specific details of each revision made has been included in the relevant data table notes to ensure transparency and clarity. Users are advised to review these notes as part of their regular use of the data to ensure their analysis accounts for these changes accordingly.
If you have questions regarding any of these changes, please contact the Vehicle statistics team.
Overview
VEH0101: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68ecf5acf159f887526bbd7c/veh0101.ods">Vehicles at the end of the quarter by licence status and body type: Great Britain and United Kingdom (ODS, 99.7 KB)
Detailed breakdowns
VEH0103: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68ecf5abf159f887526bbd7b/veh0103.ods">Licensed vehicles at the end of the year by tax class: Great Britain and United Kingdom (ODS, 23.8 KB)
VEH0105: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68ecf5ac2adc28a81b4acfc8/veh0105.ods">Licensed vehicles at
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Supplementary Data for "Revisiting the discrimination and distribution of S-type granites from zircon trace element compositions" by Nick Roberts et al.
Facebook
TwitterA full list of tables can be found in the table index.
BUS0415: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/691f4af0d3a80970b766f11a/bus0415.ods">Local bus fares index by metropolitan area status and country, quarterly: Great Britain (ODS, 21.9 KB)
This spreadsheet includes breakdowns by country, region, metropolitan area status, urban-rural classification and Local Authority. It also includes data per head of population, and concessionary journeys.
BUS01: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/692591b82945773cf12dd01a/bus01.ods"> Local bus passenger journeys (ODS, 152 KB)
Limited historic data is available
These spreadsheets include breakdowns by country, region, metropolitan area status, urban-rural classification and Local Authority, as well as by service type. Vehicle distance travelled is a measure of levels of service provision.
BUS02_mi: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/692591b89fd433badebc3141/bus02_mi.ods">Vehicle distance travelled (miles) (ODS, 126 KB)
BUS02_km: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/692591b847904590c9da2cc8/bus02_km.ods">Vehicle distance travelled (kilometres) (ODS, 118 KB)
Limited historic data is available
Following a review of the methodology, table BUS03 has been fully revised back to 2005.
This spreadsheet includes breakdowns by country and metropolitan area status, as well as average occupancy data.
BUS03: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/692591b833d088f6d5da2cce/bus03.ods">Passenger distance travelled (miles and kilometres) (ODS, 18.4 KB)
Limited historic data is available
These spreadsheets include breakdowns by country and metropolitan area status, as well as revenue and costs per passenger journey and vehicle mile/kilometre.
BUS04i: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/692591b847904590c9da2cc9/bus04i.ods">Costs, fares and revenue in current prices (ODS, 41 KB)
BUS04ii: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/692591b822424e25e6bc313c/bus04ii.ods"> Costs, fares and revenue in constant prices (ODS, <span class="gem-c-attachment-link_a
Facebook
TwitterThis is a collection of data tables supporting the LCMAP CONUS Geographic Assessment v1.0. The data used to generate these tables come from the USGS LCMAP reference dataset and the map products released by LCMAP. Tables include annual land cover class composition and annual rate of land cover change metrics developed with a post-stratified estimator. Other tables including annual gross change of specific types of land covers, cumulative metrics of overall geographic footprint of change, frequency of overall geographic footprint of change, overall area estimates of specific class changes, and all unique changes in land cover classes. All tables cover the time period 1985-2016. All values in these tables are presented in percent and/or square kilometers of CONUS and include standard errors (SE). Tables 1a and 1b are annual land-cover class area estimates. Tables 1a and 1b are annual land-cover class area estimates. Table 1a presents the estimated area of each LCMAP land cover class as a percent of CONUS and Table 1b is the same in square kilometers, both with SEs. The area estimates include the following eight LCMAP land covers classes: Developed, Cropland, Grass/Shrub, Tree Cover, Water, Wetland, Snow/Ice, and Barren (Brown et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2014).Table 2 is the estimated overall net change in each of the eight LCMAP land-cover classes: Developed, Cropland, Grass/Shrub, Tree Cover, Water, Wetland, Ice/Snow, and Barren (Brown et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2014). It includes percent and square kilometers of CONUS in 1985 and 2016. The net area that changed between 1985 and 2016 is presented in percent and km2 of CONUS with the standard error of this change. Table 3 represents area estimates for the area that changed a specific number of times during 1985–2016. These areas are presented as both the fraction of LCMAP’s CONUS extent and as the equivalent in square kilometers, with standard errors. The overall footprint of change that occurred between 1985 and 2016 is presented as the percent and km2 of CONUS. Table 4 is the estimated percent and areal extent (km2) of CONUS that experienced either a change, or none, for each year 1986–2016, with associated standard errors. Tables 5a–h present the areal extent estimates (in km2) for specific land-cover class changes with standard error for every year, 1986–2016. The specific land-cover classes include Developed, Cropland, Grass/Shrub, Tree Cover, Water, Wetland, Ice/Snow, and Barren (Brown et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2014). Table 6a presents area estimates (km2) of CONUS for all land-cover class changes with standard error for every year, 1986–2016. Table 6b presents area estimates (km2) of CONUS that did not change for all eight LCMAP land-cover classes with standard error for every year, 1986–2016. The eight LCMAP land-cover classes include Developed, Cropland, Grass/Shrub, Tree Cover, Water, Wetland, Ice/Snow, and Barren (Brown et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2014). Table 7 presents the estimated area (km2) of CONUS for four groupings of land-cover class changes with standard error for every year, 1986–2016. The eight LCMAP land-cover classes and class codes include Developed (1), Cropland (2), Grass/Shrub (3), Tree Cover (4), Water (5), Wetland (6), Ice/Snow (7), and Barren (8) (Brown et al., 2020; Zhu et al. 2014). The four groups include “Natural Resource Cycles”, “Increases in Developed and Built-up Land”, “Surface Water Expansion/Contraction”, and “Other”. Table 8 presents the cumulative (1985-2016) area of all specific land cover class changes, 56 in total.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Description of spring 2017 farm data including, site name, farm scheme, wildflower strips (WFS) category (yes or no), habitat type and number of insect visited flower species.
Facebook
TwitterU.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
This dataset is a compilation of the data export tables available on WUEdata for the 2020 Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs).
Facebook
TwitterFrequencies of snake behaviors for each species and predatory model. (XLSX)
Facebook
TwitterThe displayed data on file types for iCloud shows results of an exclusive Statista survey conducted in the United States in 2018. Some ** percent of respondents answered the question ''What do you use your iCloud for?'' with ''Photos''.The Survey Data Table for the Statista survey Tech Giants and Digital Services in the United States 2019 contains the complete tables for the survey including various column headings.
Facebook
TwitterOutcomes assigned to offences recorded to December 2024 and the total number of outcomes recorded, by outcome type and offence type.
For the latest data tables see ‘Police recorded crime and outcomes open data tables’.
Facebook
TwitterTable from the American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year series on household types and population related topics for City of Seattle Council Districts, Comprehensive Plan Growth Areas and Community Reporting Areas. Table includes B11003 Family Type by Presence and Age of Own Children under 18 Years, B11005 Households by Presence of People Under 18 Years by Household Type, B11007 Households by Presence of People 65 Years and Over by Household Type, B11001 Household Type (Including Living Alone), B11002 Household Type by Relatives and Nonrelatives for Population in Households, B25003 Tenure, B25008 Total Population in Occupied Housing Units by Tenure, B09019 Household Type (Including Living Alone) by Relationship. Data is pulled from block group tables for the most recent ACS vintage and summarized to the neighborhoods based on block group assignment.Table created for and used in the Neighborhood Profiles application.Vintages: 2023ACS Table(s): B11003, B11005, B11007, B11001, B11002, B25003, B25008, B09019Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's Explore Census Data The United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):<a href='https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/about.html' style='color:rgb(0, 121, 193); text-decoration-line:none; font-family:inherit;' target='_blank' rel=
Facebook
TwitterThis statistic shows the results of a survey conducted in the United States in 2018 on the interest in alternative drive types. Some ** percent of respondents stated that they were not at all interested in alternative drive types. The Survey Data Table for the Statista survey Cars & Mobility in the United States 2018 contains the complete tables for the survey including various column headings.
Facebook
TwitterOpen Government Licence - Canada 2.0https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada
License information was derived automatically
The National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) is Canada's public inventory of pollutant releases (to air, water and land), disposals and transfers for recycling. Each file contains annual total releases for the past ten years by media (air, water or land), broken-down by province, industry or substance. Files are in .CSV format. The results can be further broken down using the pre-defined search available at the bottom of the NPRI Data Search webpage. The results returned by the NPRI search engine may differ from the numbers contained in the downloadable files. The online search engine’s results will display releases, disposals and transfers reported by facilities, but does not distinguish between media type (i.e. air, water, land). It also displays facilities reporting only under Ontario Regulation 127/01 and facilities submitting “did not meet criteria” reports. Please consult the following resources to enhance your analysis: - Guide on using and Interpreting NPRI Data: https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/national-pollutant-release-inventory/using-interpreting-data.html - Access additional data from the NPRI, including datasets and mapping products: https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/national-pollutant-release-inventory/tools-resources-data/exploredata.html Supplemental Information More NPRI datasets and mapping products are available here: https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/national-pollutant-release-inventory/tools-resources-data/access.html Supporting Projects: National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI)
Facebook
TwitterThis data table provides the detailed data quality assessment scores for the Embedded Generation by Type dataset. The quality assessment was carried out on the 31st March. At SPEN, we are dedicated to sharing high-quality data with our stakeholders and being transparent about its' quality. This is why we openly share the results of our data quality assessments. We collaborate closely with Data Owners to address any identified issues and enhance our overall data quality. To demonstrate our progress we conduct, at a minimum, bi-annual assessments of our data quality - for datasets that are refreshed more frequently than this, please note that the quality assessment may be based on an earlier version of the dataset. To learn more about our approach to how we assess data quality, visit Data Quality - SP Energy Networks.We welcome feedback and questions from our stakeholders regarding this process. Our Open Data Team is available to answer any enquiries or receive feedback on the assessments. You can contact them via our Open Data mailbox at opendata@spenergynetworks.co.uk.The first phase of our comprehensive data quality assessment measures the quality of our datasets across three dimensions. Please refer to the data table schema for the definitions of these dimensions. We are now in the process of expanding our quality assessments to include additional dimensions to provide a more comprehensive evaluation and will update the data tables with the results when available.DisclaimerThe data quality assessment may not represent the quality of the current dataset that is published on the Open Data Portal. Please check the date of the latest quality assessment and compare to the 'Modified' date of the corresponding dataset. The data quality assessments will be updated on either a quarterly or annual basis, dependent on the update frequency of the dataset. This information can be found in the dataset metadata, within the Information tab. If you require a more up to date quality assessment, please contact the Open Data Team at opendata@spenergynetworks.co.uk and a member of the team will be in contact.
Facebook
TwitterFIRE0601: Primary fires by cause of fire and incident type (19 September 2029)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66e3ee36718edd81771316da/fire-statistics-data-tables-fire0601-210923.xlsx">FIRE0601: Primary fires in dwellings and other buildings by cause of fire (21 September 2023) (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 104 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/650ac9aa27d43b001491c2b3/fire-statistics-data-tables-fire0601-290922.xlsx">FIRE0601: Primary fires in dwellings and other buildings by cause of fire (29 September 2022) (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 45.1 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/633170b08fa8f51d21dbbf30/fire-statistics-data-tables-fire0601-300921.xlsx">FIRE0601: Primary fires in dwellings and other buildings by cause of fire (30 September 2021) (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 53.3 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6151abec8fa8f5610ab86301/fire-statistics-data-tables-fire0601-011020.xlsx">FIRE0601: Primary fires in dwellings and other buildings by cause of fire (1 October 2020) (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 44.2 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f71db7d8fa8f5188883f29a/fire-statistics-data-tables-fire0601-120919.xlsx">FIRE0601: Primary fires in dwellings and other buildings by cause of fire (12 September 2019) (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 31.9 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5d762945ed915d08f7111e37/fire-statistics-data-tables-fire0601-060918.xlsx">FIRE0601: Primary fires in dwellings and other buildings by cause of fire (6 September 2018) (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 34.9 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5b8d3f7ee5274a0bdab54b2e/fire-statistics-data-tables-fire0601.xlsx">FIRE0601: Primary fires in dwellings and other buildings by cause of fire (12 October 2017) (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 43 KB)
Fire statistics data tables
Fire statistics guidance
Fire statistics
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset was created by Piyush Ranjan
Facebook
TwitterParticipation rate (percentage) in education, population aged 15 to 29, by age and type of institution attended, Canada. This table is included in Section E: Transitions and outcomes: Transitions to postsecondary education of the Pan Canadian Education Indicators Program (PCEIP). PCEIP draws from a wide variety of data sources to provide information on the school-age population, elementary, secondary and postsecondary education, transitions, and labour market outcomes. The program presents indicators for all of Canada, the provinces, the territories, as well as selected international comparisons and comparisons over time. PCEIP is an ongoing initiative of the Canadian Education Statistics Council, a partnership between Statistics Canada and the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada that provides a set of statistical measures on education systems in Canada.
Facebook
TwitterThis statistic shows the results of a survey conducted in the United States in 2017 on pets. Some ** percent of the respondents stated that they had a dog in their family while growing up.The Survey Data Table for the Statista survey pets in the U.S. 2017 contains the complete tables for the survey including various column headings.
Facebook
TwitterThe Eminent Domain Data table includes information about the entities that have reported to the Comptroller’s office, their contact information, and whether they have used their eminent domain authority through filing a condemnation petition. Each report includes a unique ID number that can be used to reference data in the Provision Data and Project Data tables. The data included in the reports was submitted by the entities, and entities are required to update the data within 90 days of changes to their information. The Comptroller’s office is not able to guarantee the accuracy of the data. The table is updated daily and includes entity names, entity types, phone numbers, addresses, email and web addresses, and points of contact. Each report specifies whether the entity used their eminent domain authority by filing a condemnation petition in the preceding year. If the report was filed by a third party, the third party’s name, contact information, and relationship to the entity is also listed.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset details operating expenses for each applicable agency, mode, and type of service (TOS), split by expense type or "Object Class" reporting to the National Transit Database in the 2022, 2023, and 2024 report years.. Object classes include salaries and wages, fuel, and others.
Only Full Reporters report expenses by function and type. Expenses from other reporter types are included under Reduced Reporter Expenses.
NTD Data Tables organize and summarize data from the National Transit Database in a manner that is more useful for quick reference and summary analysis. This dataset is based on the 2022 - 2024 Operating Expenses database files.
In years 2015-2021, you can find this data in the "Operating Expenses" data table on NTD Program website, at https://transit.dot.gov/ntd/ntd-data.
If you have any other questions about this table, please contact the NTD Help Desk at NTDHelp@dot.gov.
Facebook
TwitterThe purpose of the SNF study was to improve our understanding of the relationship between remotely sensed observations and important biophysical parameters in the boreal forest. A key element of the experiment was the development of methodologies to measure forest stand characteristics to determine values of importance to both remote sensing and ecology. Parameters studied were biomass, leaf area index, above ground net primary productivity, bark area index and ground coverage by vegetation. Thirty two quaking aspen and thirty one black spruce sites were studied. Sites were chosen in uniform stands of aspen or spruce. The dominant species in the site constituted over 80 percent, and usually over 95 percent, of the total tree density and basal area. Aspen stands were chosen to represent the full range of age and stem density of essentially pure aspen, of nearly complete canopy closure, and greater than two meters in height. Spruce stands ranged from very sparse stands on bog sites, to dense, closed stands on more productive peatlands. Use of multiple plots within each site allowed estimation of the importance of spatial variation in stand parameters. Within each plot, all woody stems greater than two meters in height were recorded by species and the following dimensions were measured: diameter breast height, height of the tree, height of the first live branch, and depth of crown. For each plot, a two meter diameter subplot was defined at the center of each plot. Within this subplot, the percent of ground coverage by plants under one meter in height was determined by species. These data, averaged for the five plots in each site, are presented in this data set (i.e., SNF Forest Understory Cover Data (Table)) in tabular format, e.g. plant species with a count for that species at each site. The same data are presented in the SNF Forest Understory Cover Data data set but are arranged with a row for each species and site and a percent ground coverage for each combination.