This report is one outcome of a study into privacy and human genetics initiated by John Gillott and staff and trustees of the Genetic Interest Group. \ud \ud The initial focus was on genetics and human rights, with an emphasis on legal aspects and policy decisions informed by law and rights ideology. Article 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998, the right to respect for private and family life,1 is of most relevance to this study, though other Articles are considered.\ud \ud The study as a whole comprises two broad strands of inquiry, reflecting those areas in which privacy rights are most relevant and have had the greatest impact: the effect of law and ideology on research and clinical practice, with a focus on genetics; and human reproduction, again with a particular focus on genetic aspects. These two areas present contrasting analytical challenges. While there is recent law indirectly or directly relevant to research and clinical practice (notably the Human Tissue Act 2004), there is little or no case law on the subject. In contrast, as regards reproduction and genetics, there have, over the past five years or so, been a number of court decisions, at all levels up to the House of Lords and the European Court of Human Rights. We therefore decided to publish the results of our study into the two areas separately, the better to highlight the key issues in each subject area. This report is on the first strand: the right to privacy in the context of medical research using tissue and data.
http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/open-government-licencehttp://reference.data.gov.uk/id/open-government-licence
All payments made by Bodmin Town Council between 1 April 2012 and 30 June 2012.
A list of payments for over £500 made to suppliers is required by the Recommended Practice for Local Authorities on Data Transparency. Bodmin Town Council has given details of all payments made. Please note that some names have been redacted in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998.
Operational tool _ contains details about the vessels including administrative port, home port, port letters and number, vessel name, Registry of Shipping and Seamen (RSS) number and overall length. Full database Includes vessel owner details that are not included in current releases as this is regulated by the Data Protection Act 1998.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Operational tool _ contains details about the vessels including administrative port, home port, port letters and number, vessel name, Registry of Shipping and Seamen (RSS) number and overall length. Full database Includes vessel owner details that are not included in current releases as this is regulated by the Data Protection Act 1998.
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.
The National Pupil Database (NPD) is one of the richest education datasets in the world. It is a longitudinal database which links pupil characteristics to information about attainment for those who attend schools and colleges in England.http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/open-government-licencehttp://reference.data.gov.uk/id/open-government-licence
Total number of registered learners on a Cambridgeshire Adult Learning Fund (CALF) course based on the location of the course venue, between the academic years of 2010/2011 to 2014/2015. Please note: All low cell counts of below 5, have all been rounded up and replaced with a 5. This prevents any breaches of the Data Protection Act 1998.
http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/open-government-licencehttp://reference.data.gov.uk/id/open-government-licence
This dataset lists the individual payments to suppliers over £500. Please note these will detail payments made in the period, and do not necessarily relate to invoices dated or received in the period. Included in the dataset are payments of over £500 in the following categories:
Personal Data that is protected under the Data Protection Act 1998 and/or any data that can identify a payment to individuals who do not constitute commercial organizations are excluded from this dataset.
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
This report is one outcome of a study into privacy and human genetics initiated by John Gillott and staff and trustees of the Genetic Interest Group. \ud \ud The initial focus was on genetics and human rights, with an emphasis on legal aspects and policy decisions informed by law and rights ideology. Article 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998, the right to respect for private and family life,1 is of most relevance to this study, though other Articles are considered.\ud \ud The study as a whole comprises two broad strands of inquiry, reflecting those areas in which privacy rights are most relevant and have had the greatest impact: the effect of law and ideology on research and clinical practice, with a focus on genetics; and human reproduction, again with a particular focus on genetic aspects. These two areas present contrasting analytical challenges. While there is recent law indirectly or directly relevant to research and clinical practice (notably the Human Tissue Act 2004), there is little or no case law on the subject. In contrast, as regards reproduction and genetics, there have, over the past five years or so, been a number of court decisions, at all levels up to the House of Lords and the European Court of Human Rights. We therefore decided to publish the results of our study into the two areas separately, the better to highlight the key issues in each subject area. This report is on the first strand: the right to privacy in the context of medical research using tissue and data.