Detailed breakdown of average weekly household expenditure on goods and services in the UK. Data are shown by place of purchase, income group (deciles) and age of household reference person.

In 2022/23 households in the United Kingdom spent approximately ***** British pounds a week on housing, fuel & power, making it the category which the average household spent the most on in that year, with transport being the second-highest spending category at **** pounds a week.

In 2022/23, the average household in the United Kingdom spent around 567.7 British pounds a week, compared with 588.8 pounds in 2020/21. During this time period, household spending peaked in 2018/19 at 697.1 pounds per week.

The British Royal Family spent a total of ***** million British pounds in 2024/25, with property maintenance and payroll costs accounting for **** million and **** million pounds respectively. After these two main costs, travel expenses for the Royal Family were around *** million pounds, with utilities and housekeeping costing *** million and *** million pounds in this period. Overall, this was the Royal Family's lowest net expenditure since 2020. Most popular Royals According to a survey conducted in 2025, the most popular member of the Royal Family was Prince William, with ** percent of respondents having a positive impression of him. Catherine, the Princess of Wales, had ** percent having a positive impression of her and was the next most popular royal. Princess Catherine was followed by Princess Anne at ** percent, and the King, Charles III, at ** percent. By contrast, Prince Andrew was the least popular member of the Royal Family, with just **** percent of people having a positive opinion of him. Royal Finances A large portion of the Royal Family's expenses are covered by an annual payment from the UK government called the Sovereign Grant, which was **** million pounds in 2024/25. Additional income comes from the private estates of the Royal Family, such as the Duchy of Lancaster, which paid approximately **** million into the Privy Purse in the 2022/23 financial year. The Prince of Wales, meanwhile, receives income from the Duchy of Cornwall, with income from this source reaching *****million pounds in 2024/25.

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.

Using representative surveys of the entire population, this research project analysed the similarities and differences between Soviet and Russian household behaviour in the informal economy during 1996-1999. The research was based primarily on unpublished archive material - Soviet family budget surveys - for the Soviet period, and regular Russian household/ adult surveys for the post-Soviet period. In particular, the project estimated and compared the size, dynamics and determinants of household behaviour in the informal economy in the two periods, and also assessed the impact of household informal economy activities on the Soviet or current Russian economy.
The continuous Soviet annual family budget survey (FBS), covering the entire population of the USSR was conducted from the early 1950s onwards under the auspices of the Soviet Central Statistical Administration. Comprehensive and detailed summary results of annual data from the family budget surveys of Soviet households aggregated by types of heads of households such as workers and state employees and collective farm workers are kept in three Russian archives. This dataset was created using some of the results from the FBS.
Main Topics:

Data are aggregated by types of heads of households (or social classes in Russian terminology), and include 35 income variables, 62 expenditure-related variables and nine savings-related variables. Each variable on the income side shows the sources of income (the state, collective farms, and other people) and each variable on the expenditure side shows to whom payment was made (the state sector, collective farms, or other people). In total, eight data files have been created:
Russian workers and state employees' families (1969-1990),
Russian collective farm ('kolkhoz') workers' families (1969-1990),
Russian pure pensioners' families who retired from jobs relating to workers and state employees (1977-1990),
Russian pure pensioners' families who retired from jobs relating to collective farms (1977-1990),
Russian state farms ('sovkhoz') workers' families (1977-1990),
Average family in the Soviet Union as a whole (1979-1990),
Soviet workers and state employees' families (1969-1990),
Soviet collective farm workers' families (1969-1990).

Percentage eligible for Personal Budget

According to a survey conducted by Attest, the majority of under 30's in the United Kingdom (UK) use some form of app to help them budget. In terms of frequency, most individuals used a budget app anywhere from once a month (** percent) to every day (** percent). Only **** percent of respondents said they used a budget app more than once a day.

The average weekly amount UK households spent on clothing amounted to **** British pounds in 2022. Among adults aged between 30 and 49, this was considerably higher at **** British pounds. Expenditure on clothing was not as high for older demographics.  Clothing: essential spending   In the fashion and apparel category, consumer spending concentrates on clothing garments, footwear, and accessories. Consumers spent **** billion British pounds on shoes and footwear in 2022. On a monthly basis, sales of clothing and footwear items at retail stores usually peak around the holiday season, a trend which has been consistently observed in previous years.   Selling clothes in a booming market, but how?   In the fashion segment, the revenue generated from e-commerce is resolutely climbing. This trend accelerated during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, as physical shopping was not possible for many consumers. To compete, more and more high street retailers in the UK are turning to selling their products via hybrid selling strategies like multichannel retail.

Percentage eligible for Personal Budget

United Kingdom Weekly Household Exp: Avg: HG: GT: Repair Expenses data was reported at 0.000 GBP in 2016. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.000 GBP for 2014. United Kingdom Weekly Household Exp: Avg: HG: GT: Repair Expenses data is updated yearly, averaging 0.000 GBP from Dec 2006 (Median) to 2016, with 10 observations. United Kingdom Weekly Household Exp: Avg: HG: GT: Repair Expenses data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Office for National Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s UK – Table UK.H023: Average Weekly Household Expenditure.

This data supports the publication titled 'Discrepancies between two long-term dietary datasets in the United Kingdom (UK)'. Longitudinal dietary data for the United Kingdom (UK) on food supply, provided by FAO food balance sheets (1961-2018) (FAO-FBS), and food purchases, provided Defra household budget surveys (National Food Survey [1942-2000] and Family Food Module [2001-2018]) (Defra-HBS). Studying dietary trends can shed light on progress towards healthier and more sustainable diets but longitudinal data are often confounded by lack of standardized methods. Two main data sources are often used for longitudinal analysis of diets: food balance sheets (per capita food supply estimated from production and trade data) and household budget surveys (household surveys on food purchased). The impact of these different collection methods has not been quantified for the UK. The data provided here were used to assess how trends in dietary change compared between the two collection methods for calories, meat and fish, nuts and pulses, and dairy, and how disparities between FAO-FBS and Defra-HBS have changed over time. These food types are comparable between FAO-FBS and Defra-HBS and can be used to monitor consumption and protein intake. The primary differences in quantities estimated by FAO-FBS and Defra-HBS occur in part due to inclusion of retail waste in FAO data and likely under-reporting of consumption in Defra data. \( \ \) “DataFrom_Figures_2_3_4_Tables_2_3” contains data used in the figures and tables of this publication. In version 2 of this dataset “DataFrom_Figures_2_3_4_Tables_2_3” has been updated to reflect revisions made to the publication. The methodology of FAO data was updated in 2014. Previously we handled data between 1961 and 2018 as a continuous time series, without adjusting for this change in methodology. However, it is necessary to adjust for the methodology change to provide accurate estimates of changes in food supply over time. The 2014 to 2018 values have been adjusted to give values consistent with the older methodology. The FAO has also published updated data for 2018 since the time of publishing, so we have updated the publication to include the updated data values. These updates affect the reported change in food supply between 1961 and 2018 (and between 2008 and 2018) for most food groups, and trends in the differences between Defra-HBS and FAO-FBS values, but do not affect the conclusions of the publication. \( \ \) UK National Food Survey data for 1942-1973 were downloaded on 08/01/2020 from https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20130103024837/http://www.defra.gov.uk/statistics/foodfarm/food/familyfood/nationalfoodsurvey/ National Food Survey data are named: “Household nutrient data from 1940 to 2000 – 1940-2000” and “Household consumption of selected foods from 1942 to 2000 – 1942-2000”. UK Family Food data for 1974 onwards were first downloaded on 19/02/2020 from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/family-food-datasets. Datasets are named “UK - household purchases”, “UK - eating out purchases” and “UK - household and eating out nutrient intakes”.

This publication provides Management Information (MI) for Integrated Care Boards (ICB) in England who submitted data on Personal Health Budgets (PHB) for Quarter 4 2024-25 (January- March 2024). By the end of Quarter 4 2024-25 (March 2024) 182,360 people had received Personal Health Budgets in England.

Snapshot img

Budget Apps Market Size 2025-2029

The budget apps market size is forecast to increase by USD 335.7 million at a CAGR of 11.4% between 2024 and 2029.

The budgeting apps market is experiencing significant growth, driven by increased internet access and the rising preference among young customers for digital financial management solutions. This trend is expected to continue as more individuals seek to better manage their expenses and savings. Hosted on cloud servers, these apps enable users to manage their financial transactions and monitor their financial health in real-time from any device with an internet connection.
However, data security and privacy concerns remain key challenges for the providers, necessitating security measures to protect user information. As the market expands, providers must prioritize these concerns to build trust and maintain user loyalty. Overall, the market presents a promising opportunity for innovation and growth in the digital financial services sector.

What will be the Size of the Budget Apps Market During the Forecast Period?

Request Free Sample

In today's digital age, budget apps have become essential tools for individuals and families seeking to manage their finances effectively. These web-based applications offer various features, including data compilation for expense and income tracking, retirement planning, debt management, and savings goals. However, as the use of budget apps continues to grow, so does the importance of ensuring privacy and security. Financial management apps provide numerous benefits, such as real-time financial insights, automated savings, and personalized financial advice. Yet, they also come with potential disadvantages, such as data breaches and privacy concerns. As such, content ideation and planning for budget apps must prioritize both benefits and disadvantages, ensuring accurate and unbiased information. Competitor analysis and semantic analysis play a crucial role in content optimization. By understanding the market dynamics and identifying topics relevant to these apps, content creators can develop engaging and informative content that resonates with their audience. Free budget apps, financial planning apps, and income trackers are just a few examples of the various types of financial management apps available.
Moreover, social media strategy and PPC advertising are essential components of marketing budget apps effectively. Content curation and tagging also play a role in ensuring that relevant and timely information is shared with the audience. With the increasing importance of digital banking solutions and financial innovation, they are poised to become even more integral to personal financial wellness and financial inclusion. In conclusion, they offer numerous benefits for individuals and families seeking to manage their finances effectively. However, it is essential to consider both the advantages and disadvantages of these applications, as well as the importance of data privacy and security. By focusing on accurate and unbiased information, content creators can develop engaging and informative content that resonates with their audience and helps them make informed decisions about using the apps for their financial management needs.

How is this market segmented and which is the largest segment?

The market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

Deployment

  Cloud-based
  On-premises


Type

  Personal budgeting apps
  Family budgeting apps
  Business budgeting apps


Geography

  North America

    Canada
    US


  APAC

    China
    India
    Japan
    South Korea


  Europe

    Germany
    UK
    France


  South America



  Middle East and Africa

By Deployment Insights

The cloud-based segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

The cloud-based budget apps segment experiences continuous growth within The market due to their accessibility, convenience, and collaborative features. Cloud-based budget apps provide significant advantages, including the ability to update financial data and track expenses instantly, making them a popular choice for individuals and businesses seeking flexible financial management solutions. These apps offer real-time updates, allowing users to easily monitor their financial needs and progress toward financial goals. With digital financial services becoming increasingly prevalent, cloud-based apps play a crucial role in the financial ecosystem by providing users with easy access to their financial data for effective financial management.

Get a glance at the market report of share of various segments Request Free Sample

The cloud-based segment was valued at USD 189.20 million in

During a 2023 survey of ad buyers from the United Kingdom, 24 percent of respondents stated they had moved budget from other traditional channels to buy programmatic digital out-of-home ads; 15 percent said they had added new budgets to programmatic DOOH.

United Kingdom Weekly Household Exp: Avg: MG: OS: PF: Funeral Expenses data was reported at 0.500 GBP in 2016. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.500 GBP for 2015. United Kingdom Weekly Household Exp: Avg: MG: OS: PF: Funeral Expenses data is updated yearly, averaging 0.300 GBP from Dec 2006 (Median) to 2016, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.100 GBP in 2011 and a record low of 0.000 GBP in 2014. United Kingdom Weekly Household Exp: Avg: MG: OS: PF: Funeral Expenses data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Office for National Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s UK – Table UK.H023: Average Weekly Household Expenditure.

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.

The Northern Ireland Family Expenditure Survey (NIFES) was conducted in Northern Ireland from 1967-1998, and was the counterpart to the Family Expenditure Survey (FES), which was conducted annually in Great Britain from 1957-2001 (see under GN 33057). The FES/NIFES provided reliable data on expenditure and income in relation to household characteristics. The results of the survey show how expenditure patterns of different kinds of households vary, and the extent to which individual members of a household contribute to the household income. Although originally commissioned to provide expenditure details for the calculation of weights for the Retail Price Index, the FES/NIFES collected much additional information was also collected on the characteristics of co-operating households and the incomes of their members. It thus became a multi-purpose survey, and provided a unique fund of important economic and social data.

From 1968 the Great Britain FES incorporated a sample drawn from the NIFES to become the UK FES. The FES was replaced in 2001 by a new survey series, the Expenditure and Food Survey (EFS) (see under GN 33334), covering the whole of the UK. The EFS is an amalgamation of the previous National Food Survey (NFS) (see under GN 33071) and UK FES.


Main Topics:
Household Schedule:
This schedule was taken at the main interview. Information for most of the questions was obtained from the head of household or housewife, but certain questions of a more individual character were put to every spender aged 15 or over (or 16 or over from 1973 onwards). Until the introduction of the community charge, information on rateable value and rate poundage was obtained from the appropriate local authority, as was information on whether the address was within a smokeless zone. Information was collected about the household, the sex and age of each member, and also details about the type and size of the household accommodation. The main part of the questionnaire related to expenditure both of a household and individual nature, but the questions were mainly confined to expenses of a recurring nature, e.g.:

• Household: housing costs, payment to Gas and Electricity Boards and companies, telephone charges, licences and television rental
• Individual: motor vehicles, season tickets for transport, life and accident insurances, payments through a bank, instalments, refund of expenses by employer, expenditure claimed by self-employed persons as business expenses for tax purposes, welfare foods, education grants and fees

Income Schedule:
Data were collected for each household spender. Apart from page 1, the schedule was concerned with income, National Insurance contributions and income tax. Income of a child not classed as a spender was obtained from one or other of his parents and entered on the parent's questionnaire. Information collected included: employment status and recent absences from work, earnings of an employee, self-employed earnings, National Insurance contributions, pensions and other regular allowances, occasional benefits - social security benefits and other types, investment income, miscellaneous earnings of a 'once-only' character, tax paid directly to Inland Revenue or refunded, income of a child.

Diary Records
Each diary covered fourteen days. Each household member aged 15 or over (or 16 or over from 1973 onwards) was asked to record all expenditure made during the 14 days.

The NIFES was identical to the UK FES and therefore used the same questionnaires and documentation. However, starting in 1988, a voluntary question on religious denomination was asked of those aged 16 and over in Northern Ireland.

Budget airlines have benefitted from consumers increasingly seeking value for money. The industry is highly concentrated, consisting of only four airlines. External factors, including business and consumer confidence, household disposable income and outbound and international tourist numbers, determine demand for budget airlines. Shocks like natural disasters, terrorist attacks and disease outbreaks also affect demand. Revenue is expected to inch upward at a compound annual rate of 0.3% over the five years through 2024-25 to £11.1 billion, including growth of 5.9% in 2024-25. Before the COVID-19 outbreak, subdued confidence and weak growth in household disposable income due to Brexit supported demand for budget airlines' services from cost-conscious customers. Low-cost carriers also benefitted from higher demand for air travel as passenger numbers were consistently rising. However, the collapse of budget airlines like Monarch, Flybe and Norwegian Air UK negatively affected revenue. The COVID-19 pandemic was disastrous for airlines, with stringent restrictions on international travel causing demand to plummet to record lows. The easing of restrictions on international travel, aided by recovering confidence, unleashed pent-up demand. Swelling passenger numbers have fuelled revenue growth since 2021-22. Soaring inflation and economic uncertainty have somewhat constrained revenue growth though these conditions have also encouraged more consumers to seek budget airlines. Revenue is forecast to expand at a compound annual rate of 4% over the five years through 2029-30 to £13.5 billion, driven by more robust demand for air travel, particularly low-cost flights. Budget airlines' expansion of fleets and operating bases will also fuel growth. Investment in aircraft and competitive pressures will likely weigh on the profit margin in the coming years. Budget airlines will have to innovate and improve their offerings to enhance the customer experience and stand out.

Personal budgets (PBs) may improve the lives of people with mental health conditions and people with intellectual disability (ID). However, a clear definition of PB, benefits, and challenges is still faded. This work aims to systematically review evidence on PB use in mental health and ID contexts, from both a qualitative and quantitative perspective, and summarize the recent research on interventions, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of PBs in beneficiaries with mental health conditions and/or ID. The present systematic review is an update of the existing literature analyzed since 2013. We performed a systematic search strategy of articles using the bibliographic databases PubMed and PsycINFO. Six blinded authors screened the works for inclusion/exclusion criteria, and two blinded authors extracted the data. We performed a formal narrative synthesis of the findings from the selected works. A total of 9,800 publications were screened, and 29 were included. Improvement in responsibility and awareness, quality of life, independent living, paid work, clinical, psychological, and social domains, and everyday aspects of the users’ and their carers’ life have been observed in people with mental health conditions and/or ID. However, the PBs need to be less stressful and burdensome in their management for users, carers, and professionals. In addition, more quantitative research is needed to inform PBs’ policymakers.Systematic Review Registration[www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42020172607].