2 datasets found
  1. d

    Green Infrastructure Areas for the Black Country (GIBC)

    • environment.data.gov.uk
    • gimi9.com
    Updated Apr 10, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Natural England (2017). Green Infrastructure Areas for the Black Country (GIBC) [Dataset]. https://environment.data.gov.uk/dataset/b3935f35-298d-4745-80a9-4e6aed17f92a
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 10, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Natural Englandhttp://www.gov.uk/natural-england
    Area covered
    Black Country
    Description

    Overview The Green Infrastructure Areas for the Black Country (GIBC) data identifies green infrastructure, green infrastructure function (or ecosystem service) and pinch point mapping for the Black Country area which includes Wolverhampton, Walsall, Sandwell and Dudley. The analysis was carried out in two stages and as a result of this, four datasets were produced: ‘GIBC 01 - Typology & Functionality OS’ ‘GIBC 02 – Pinch Points OS’ ‘GIBC 03 – Pinch Points Consortium Housing’ ‘GIBC 04 – Pinch Points Housing Land Availability’ First Stage Processing Ordnance Survey data was used as the base layer for all the processing. The first process produced the ‘GIBC 01 - Typology & Functionality OS’ dataset. This dataset is then subsequently used as a basis for the production of the second, third and fourth datasets during the second stage. In the first stage each OS polygon was assigned a green infrastructure category based on the SPADES project from the list below.
    Green Infrastructure Categories are: Garden Green corridor Pocket park Park or garden Outdoor sports facility Children’s play space Youth area Broadleaved woodland Mixed woodland Coniferous woodland Natural and semi-natural open spaces Pasture or meadow Wetland Watercourse Fresh water body Allotments Orchard Cemetery or churchyard Open space around premises Agricultural land Road island/verge Railway corridor Abandoned, ruderal and derelict area The OS polygon was then assigned “A function beneficial to people” dependent on the Green Infrastructure Category already assigned. The 26 categories that perform a “function beneficial to people” are: Accessible water storage Carbon storage Community cohesion Connection with local environment Corridor for wildlife Culture Encouraging green travel Evaporative cooling Flow reduction through surface roughness Habitat for wildlife Heritage Inaccessible water storage Learning Local food production Pollination Pollutant removal from soil/water Providing jobs Recreation - private Recreation - public Recreation - public with restrictions Shading from the sun Trapping air pollutants Visual contribution to landscape character Water conveyance Water infiltration Water interception In its simplest form the process flow looks like this: OS base layer → assigned green infrastructure → assigned function (Eg - OS polygon → coniferous woodland → shading from the sun) The first dataset, ‘GIBC 01 - Typology & Functionality OS’, therefore shows the following: The green infrastructure category The function beneficial to people Shows areas of greatest need for this function. Shows areas whereby the function has been met. Shows areas whereby the function has not been met. Second Stage Processing The second stage expands on the first by establishing which areas suffer from stress associated with investment in growth and redevelopment of land. These areas are known as ‘pinch points’. Wherever there is a high level of need for a particular function (identified in the first process), a potential ‘pinch point’ exists. The pinch point categories that have been identified are: Air Quality Pinch Culture Pinch Flooding Pinch Heat Stress Pinch Heritage Pinch Local Community Pinch Mental Health Pinch Nature Pinch Physical Activity Pinch Recreation Pinch Sustainable Travel Pinch The second dataset, ‘GIBC 02 – Pinch Points OS’, takes the analysis from the first stage process and using the Ordnance Survey data as a base layer, displays the ‘pinch points’ analysis results. The third dataset, ‘GIBC 03 – Pinch Points Consortium Housing’, takes the analysis from the first stage process and rather than using the OS as a base uses the Consortium Housing Site data instead to display ‘pinch points’. The fourth dataset, ‘GIBC 04 – Pinch Points Housing Land Availability’, takes the analysis from the first stage process and rather than using the OS as a base used the Strategic Housing Land Availability data instead to display ‘pinch points’. Conclusion The ‘pinch point’ mapping can help identify particular areas of stress, which when used in conjunction with the green infrastructure and function mapping from the first stage process can be used to help alleviate those stresses.

  2. Multi-year clean maritime demonstration competition

    • gov.uk
    • s3.amazonaws.com
    Updated Jan 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Department for Transport (2025). Multi-year clean maritime demonstration competition [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/clean-maritime-demonstration-competition-cmdc
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 24, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Department for Transport
    Description

    The first round of the https://apply-for-innovation-funding.service.gov.uk/competition/888/overview" class="govuk-link">Clean Maritime Demonstration Competition (CDMC) launched in March 2021 and ended in March 2022. It allocated up to £23,259,000 funding to 55 projects across the UK to deliver feasibility studies and technology trials in clean maritime solutions. The projects comprised 208 partners from across the UK and represent a total investment of £33.5 million.

    The https://apply-for-innovation-funding.service.gov.uk/competition/1190/overview" class="govuk-link">second round of the CMDC launched in May 2022 and ended in August 2023. It allocated £12 million funding to 31 projects to deliver feasibility studies and pre-deployment trials in innovative clean maritime solutions. The projects comprised 121 partners from across the UK and represent a total investment of £20.8 million.

    The https://apply-for-innovation-funding.service.gov.uk/competition/1313/overview/d85ba3d5-5f6f-4caf-978a-c00c21069024" class="govuk-link">third round of the CMDC launched in September 2022 and ends in March 2025. It will allocate £60 million funding to 19 projects to deliver technology and system demonstrations in clean maritime solutions. The projects comprise 93 partners from across the UK and represent a total investment of £89.9 million.

    The https://apply-for-innovation-funding.service.gov.uk/competition/1645/overview/3013bb72-ee5b-4fda-9baf-47da3910b144" class="govuk-link">fourth round of the CMDC launched in July 2023 and ends in March 2025. It will allocate £33 million for demonstrations, pre-deployment trials and feasibility studies in clean maritime solutions. The projects comprise 143 partners from across the UK and represent a total investment of £49.3 million.

    The fifth round of the CMDC is the International Green Corridor Fund (IGCF). The IGCF was announced in September 2023 and has allocated funding for feasibility studies that examine green corridor routes between the UK and international partner countries between 2024 and 2025.

    The sixth round of the CMDC was announced on 16 January 2025. It will allocate up to £30 million for pre-deployment trials and feasibility studies in clean maritime solutions between September 2025 and March 2026. It will maintain the momentum generated through the UK SHORE programme, supporting technologies to develop towards commercialisation. The competition will be open for applications from 24 January to 16 April 2025. More information on the competition scope, eligibility and how to apply is available on the competition page.

  3. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Natural England (2017). Green Infrastructure Areas for the Black Country (GIBC) [Dataset]. https://environment.data.gov.uk/dataset/b3935f35-298d-4745-80a9-4e6aed17f92a

Green Infrastructure Areas for the Black Country (GIBC)

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Apr 10, 2017
Dataset authored and provided by
Natural Englandhttp://www.gov.uk/natural-england
Area covered
Black Country
Description

Overview The Green Infrastructure Areas for the Black Country (GIBC) data identifies green infrastructure, green infrastructure function (or ecosystem service) and pinch point mapping for the Black Country area which includes Wolverhampton, Walsall, Sandwell and Dudley. The analysis was carried out in two stages and as a result of this, four datasets were produced: ‘GIBC 01 - Typology & Functionality OS’ ‘GIBC 02 – Pinch Points OS’ ‘GIBC 03 – Pinch Points Consortium Housing’ ‘GIBC 04 – Pinch Points Housing Land Availability’ First Stage Processing Ordnance Survey data was used as the base layer for all the processing. The first process produced the ‘GIBC 01 - Typology & Functionality OS’ dataset. This dataset is then subsequently used as a basis for the production of the second, third and fourth datasets during the second stage. In the first stage each OS polygon was assigned a green infrastructure category based on the SPADES project from the list below.
Green Infrastructure Categories are: Garden Green corridor Pocket park Park or garden Outdoor sports facility Children’s play space Youth area Broadleaved woodland Mixed woodland Coniferous woodland Natural and semi-natural open spaces Pasture or meadow Wetland Watercourse Fresh water body Allotments Orchard Cemetery or churchyard Open space around premises Agricultural land Road island/verge Railway corridor Abandoned, ruderal and derelict area The OS polygon was then assigned “A function beneficial to people” dependent on the Green Infrastructure Category already assigned. The 26 categories that perform a “function beneficial to people” are: Accessible water storage Carbon storage Community cohesion Connection with local environment Corridor for wildlife Culture Encouraging green travel Evaporative cooling Flow reduction through surface roughness Habitat for wildlife Heritage Inaccessible water storage Learning Local food production Pollination Pollutant removal from soil/water Providing jobs Recreation - private Recreation - public Recreation - public with restrictions Shading from the sun Trapping air pollutants Visual contribution to landscape character Water conveyance Water infiltration Water interception In its simplest form the process flow looks like this: OS base layer → assigned green infrastructure → assigned function (Eg - OS polygon → coniferous woodland → shading from the sun) The first dataset, ‘GIBC 01 - Typology & Functionality OS’, therefore shows the following: The green infrastructure category The function beneficial to people Shows areas of greatest need for this function. Shows areas whereby the function has been met. Shows areas whereby the function has not been met. Second Stage Processing The second stage expands on the first by establishing which areas suffer from stress associated with investment in growth and redevelopment of land. These areas are known as ‘pinch points’. Wherever there is a high level of need for a particular function (identified in the first process), a potential ‘pinch point’ exists. The pinch point categories that have been identified are: Air Quality Pinch Culture Pinch Flooding Pinch Heat Stress Pinch Heritage Pinch Local Community Pinch Mental Health Pinch Nature Pinch Physical Activity Pinch Recreation Pinch Sustainable Travel Pinch The second dataset, ‘GIBC 02 – Pinch Points OS’, takes the analysis from the first stage process and using the Ordnance Survey data as a base layer, displays the ‘pinch points’ analysis results. The third dataset, ‘GIBC 03 – Pinch Points Consortium Housing’, takes the analysis from the first stage process and rather than using the OS as a base uses the Consortium Housing Site data instead to display ‘pinch points’. The fourth dataset, ‘GIBC 04 – Pinch Points Housing Land Availability’, takes the analysis from the first stage process and rather than using the OS as a base used the Strategic Housing Land Availability data instead to display ‘pinch points’. Conclusion The ‘pinch point’ mapping can help identify particular areas of stress, which when used in conjunction with the green infrastructure and function mapping from the first stage process can be used to help alleviate those stresses.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu