Facebook
TwitterIn 2024/25 the United Kingdom spent an estimated 313 billion British pounds on welfare, compared with 297 billion pounds in the previous year.
Facebook
TwitterIn 2024/25 the UK government is expected to spend approximately ******billion British pounds on benefits, compared with the previous year when benefit expenditure was ******billion pounds.
Facebook
TwitterIn 2022/23 the UK spent approximately 10.2 percent of its GDP on social security, compared with 10.7 percent in the previous year.
Facebook
TwitterIn 2025/26, the budgeted expenditure of the United Kingdom government is expected to be reach 1,335 billion British pounds, with the highest spending function being the 379 billion pounds expected to be spent on social protection, which includes pensions and other welfare benefits. Government spending on health was expected to be 277 billion pounds and was the second-highest spending function in this fiscal year, while education was the third-highest spending category at 146 billion pounds. UK government debt approaching 100 percent of GDP At the end of the 2024/25 financial year, the UK's government debt amounted to approximately 2.8 trillion British pounds, around 96 percent of GDP that year. This is due to the UK having to borrow money to cover its spending commitments, especially at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, when this deficit amounted to 314.6 billion pounds. Without significant cuts to spending or tax rises, the current government is aiming to reduce this debt by creating a stronger, more productive economy. Though this is how Britain's post WW2 debt was reduced, the country faces far more structural problems to growth than it did in the mid 20th century. Income Tax the UK's main revenue source Income Tax is expected to raise approximately 329 billion British pounds in the 2025/26 financial year, and be the largest revenue source for the government that year. Value Added Tax (VAT) receipts are expected to raise 214 billion pounds, with National Insurance contributions reaching 199 billion pounds. Although National Insurance rates for employees has actually fallen recently, the rate which employers pay was one of the main tax rises announced in the Autumn 2024 budget, rising from 13.8 percent to 15 percent. Though this avoided raising tax for workers directly, many UK businesses were critical of the move, with taxation seen as the main issue facing them at the start of 2025.
Facebook
TwitterThis is a quarterly National Statistics release of the main DWP-administered benefits via Stat-Xplore or supplementary tables where appropriate.
The https://www.gov.scot/publications/responsibility-for-benefits-overview/">devolution of social security benefits to the Scottish Government is beginning to impact DWP statistics, where benefit administration is moving from DWP to the Scottish Government. As this change takes place, for a transitional period, Social Security Scotland will administer new claims and DWP will continue to administer existing claims under an agency agreement. DWP will no longer hold a complete count of the number of claimants across Great Britain.
We are now considering how we present Official Statistics on disability benefits, and the key change we propose will be the removal of the Great Britain total. Instead, we propose to present totals for England and Wales, where DWP is retaining policy ownership, and a separate breakdown for Scotland where we are administering claims on behalf of the Scottish Government.
Under this proposal DWP would only make presentational changes when a material impact on the benefit statistics becomes apparent. We want to continue to provide a total picture for Great Britain in situations where DWP still administer a benefit in its entirety. For Disability Living Allowance, we want to make changes in time for our release in August 2022.
We would welcome your views on these proposed changes, please contact: benefits.statistics@dwp.gov.uk
Please refer to our background information note for more information on Scottish devolution.
During 2019, a new DWP computer system called “Get Your State Pension” (GYSP) came online to handle State Pension claims. The GYSP system is now handling a sizeable proportion of new claims.
We are not yet able to include GYSP system data in our published statistics for State Pension. The number of GYSP cases are too high to allow us to continue to publish State Pension data on Stat-Xplore. In the short term, we will provide GYSP estimates based on payment systems data. As a temporary measure, State Pension statistics will be published via data tables only. This release contains State Pensions estimates for the five quarters to November 2021.
For these reasons, a biannual release of supplementary tables to show State Pension deferment increments and proportions of beneficiaries receiving a full amount has been suspended. The latest available time period for these figures remains September 2020.
We are developing new statistical datasets to properly represent both computer systems. Once we have quality assured the new data it will be published on Stat-Xplore, including a refresh of historical data using the best data available.
Read our background information note for more information about this.
A policy change was introduced in April 2018 whereby Universal Credit (UC) recipients in specified types of temporary accommodation would need to claim support for housing costs through Housing Benefit (HB) rather than the Housing Element of UC. This change has led to a growing number of HB claimants showing in ou
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Issue ownership theory posits that when social welfare is electorally salient, left-wing parties gain public support by rhetorically emphasizing social welfare issues. There is less research, however, on whether left-wing governing parties benefit from increasing social welfare spending. That is, it is not known whether leftist governments gain from acting on the issues they rhetorically emphasize. This article presents arguments that voters will not react to governments’ social welfare rhetoric, and reviews the conflicting arguments about how government support responds to social welfare spending. It then reports time-series, cross-sectional analyses of data on government support, governments’ social welfare rhetoric and social welfare spending from Britain, Spain and the United States, that support the prediction that government rhetoric has no effects. The article estimates, however, that increased social welfare spending sharply depresses support for both left- and right-wing governments. These findings highlight a strategic dilemma for left-wing governments, which lose public support when they act on their social welfare rhetoric by increasing welfare spending.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Government spending in the United Kingdom was last recorded at 44.0 percent of GDP in 2024 . This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United Kingdom Government Spending to GDP - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.
Facebook
TwitterThis is the final edition of Housing Benefit caseload data in spreadsheet format. Use DWP’s https://stat-xplore.dwp.gov.uk/">Stat-Xplore tool to find the latest caseload data.
The data is now only released on Stat-Xplore, an online tool which allows you to create your own customised tables and charts.
Email stats-consultation@dwp.gov.uk if you have any comments or questions about this.
DWP also publishes historic and forecast benefit expenditure and caseload data which is usually consistent with the annual Budget and Autumn Statement.
Facebook
TwitterIn 2024/25, public spending on social protection in the United Kingdom was ***** British pounds per capita, ranging from ***** pounds per capita in Northern Ireland, to ***** pounds per capita in South East England.
Facebook
TwitterSocial protection spending on unemployment in the United Kingdom was 1.3 billion pounds in 2024/25, compared with 1.21 billion in the previous financial year.
Facebook
TwitterDWP published long-term projections of pensioner benefit expenditure following the Office for Budget Responsibility’s (OBR) Fiscal Sustainability Report in July 2012. These projections have now been updated to reflect the changes to the medium-term outlook at the 2012 Autumn Statement.
This document and the accompanying tables update those projections in line with the benefit expenditure and caseload projections produced for the 2012 Autumn Statement. This enables the white paper ‘The single-tier pension: a simple foundation for saving’ and the accompanying impact assessment to be based on the most up to date economic forecasts. These projections do not include the single-tier pension.
Facebook
TwitterThis statistic shows the forecasted United Kingdom government spending on pension credit from fiscal year 2017/18 to fiscal year 2023/24. The cost of this welfare benefit is expected to decrease year on year until 2023/24, at which point spending is expected to be *** billion pounds.
Facebook
TwitterThis publication provides estimates of the levels of fraud and error in the benefit system in Great Britain, for the financial year ending 2024.
The main stories from the publication are:
3.7% (£9.7 billion) of total benefit expenditure was overpaid due to fraud and error.
0.4% (£1.1 billion) of total benefit expenditure was underpaid due to fraud and error
the net loss to the Department for Work and Pensions, after accounting for recoveries, was 3.2% (£8.6 billion) of total benefit expenditure
The estimates that were previously reported as Claimant Error underpayments have been removed from the ‘Fraud and error in the benefit system’ publication and are now reported separately in the Unfulfilled eligibility in the benefit system statistics release.
Feedback or enquiries about these statistics should be directed by email to: enquiries.fema@dwp.gov.uk
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/3098/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/3098/terms
This survey is part of a continuing series designed to monitor trends in a wide range of social attitudes in Great Britain. The British Social Attitudes Survey (BSA) is similar to the General Social Survey carried out by the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) in the United States. The BSA questionnaire has two parts, one administered by an interviewer and the other completed by the respondent. As in the past, the 1995 interview questionnaire contained a number of "core" questions covering the major topic areas of defense, the economy, labor market participation, and the welfare state. The 1995 self-enumerated questionnaire was devoted to a series of questions on a range of social, economic, political, and moral issues. Topics covered (by section) are: (1) newspaper readership and identification, (2) public spending, welfare benefits, and health care, (3) economic activity, labor market, training, and disabled people, (4) fear of crime, (5) constitutional issues, (6) education, (7) drugs, (8) Northern Ireland, (9) housing, (10) religion and ethnic origin, (11) classification, (12) countryside, the environment, and transportation, (13) taste and decency, (14) economic prospects, (15) taxation and public spending, (16) charitable giving, (17) welfare/Social Security, (18) euthanasia, and (19) pensions. An international initiative funded by the Nuffield Foundation, the International Social Survey Program (ISSP), also contributes a module to the BSA. The topic of the ISSP module in this collection was national identity. Additional demographic data included age, education, income, marital status, and religious and political affiliations.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Shrinking state spending in the UK has been accompanied by a profound restructuring of the welfare system, leading to financial insecurity for many people, culminating in extreme stress and serious deterioration of physical and mental health. Theory surrounding the impact of welfare advice on stress is lacking; this paper undertakes an in depth exploration of the experiences of stress among welfare advice seekers, considering these in light of existing substantive theories of stress and coping to generate new insight. A thematic analysis explored the experiences of stress in welfare advice seekers. Four overarching themes and twelve subthemes emerged. They are further understood utilising traditional theories of stress (Transactional Model of Stress and Coping and the Conservation of Resources theory), which then underpin the development of a ‘Stress Support Matrix’ and a holistic theory related specifically to welfare, stress and coping.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset contains data about two ISEWs for the EU27, its individual Member States (MS), the UK and the US. Following Van der Slycken and Bleys (2023) (1), two variants of the ISEW are presented in this dataset: the ISEW_BCE accounts for the benefits and costs of the present and pasts activities experienced in the present and within a specific country (Benefits and Costs Experienced); the ISEW_BCPA accounts for the benefits and costs of present activities experienced in the present and in the future, both domestically and internationally (Benefits and Costs of Present economic Activities).
This document contains different datasets. Two datasets contain a summary of the values of the ISEWs and their components in ‘per capita’ terms. One summary presents the results for the EU27 (and MS) and the other one presents the results for the UK and the US (Non-EU countries). Additionally, each component is presented in some details in different pages, allowing to see the value of the different subcomponents included in each component (and even the value of some items with subcomponents for some components).
The period covered by this dataset is 1995-2020.
All the components are described in the accompanying table and in the report.
(1) Van der Slycken, J. and Bleys, B. (2023). Towards ISEW and GPI 2.0: Dealing with Cross-Time and Cross-Boundary Issues in a Case Study for Belgium. Social Indicators Research, 168(1):557-583.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-noticehttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-notice
Budget Apps Market Size 2025-2029
The budget apps market size is forecast to increase by USD 335.7 million at a CAGR of 11.4% between 2024 and 2029.
The budgeting apps market is experiencing significant growth, driven by increased internet access and the rising preference among young customers for digital financial management solutions. This trend is expected to continue as more individuals seek to better manage their expenses and savings. Hosted on cloud servers, these apps enable users to manage their financial transactions and monitor their financial health in real-time from any device with an internet connection.
However, data security and privacy concerns remain key challenges for the providers, necessitating security measures to protect user information. As the market expands, providers must prioritize these concerns to build trust and maintain user loyalty. Overall, the market presents a promising opportunity for innovation and growth in the digital financial services sector.
What will be the Size of the Budget Apps Market During the Forecast Period?
Request Free Sample
In today's digital age, budget apps have become essential tools for individuals and families seeking to manage their finances effectively. These web-based applications offer various features, including data compilation for expense and income tracking, retirement planning, debt management, and savings goals. However, as the use of budget apps continues to grow, so does the importance of ensuring privacy and security. Financial management apps provide numerous benefits, such as real-time financial insights, automated savings, and personalized financial advice. Yet, they also come with potential disadvantages, such as data breaches and privacy concerns. As such, content ideation and planning for budget apps must prioritize both benefits and disadvantages, ensuring accurate and unbiased information. Competitor analysis and semantic analysis play a crucial role in content optimization. By understanding the market dynamics and identifying topics relevant to these apps, content creators can develop engaging and informative content that resonates with their audience. Free budget apps, financial planning apps, and income trackers are just a few examples of the various types of financial management apps available.
Moreover, social media strategy and PPC advertising are essential components of marketing budget apps effectively. Content curation and tagging also play a role in ensuring that relevant and timely information is shared with the audience. With the increasing importance of digital banking solutions and financial innovation, they are poised to become even more integral to personal financial wellness and financial inclusion. In conclusion, they offer numerous benefits for individuals and families seeking to manage their finances effectively. However, it is essential to consider both the advantages and disadvantages of these applications, as well as the importance of data privacy and security. By focusing on accurate and unbiased information, content creators can develop engaging and informative content that resonates with their audience and helps them make informed decisions about using the apps for their financial management needs.
How is this market segmented and which is the largest segment?
The market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.
Deployment
Cloud-based
On-premises
Type
Personal budgeting apps
Family budgeting apps
Business budgeting apps
Geography
North America
Canada
US
APAC
China
India
Japan
South Korea
Europe
Germany
UK
France
South America
Middle East and Africa
By Deployment Insights
The cloud-based segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.
The cloud-based budget apps segment experiences continuous growth within The market due to their accessibility, convenience, and collaborative features. Cloud-based budget apps provide significant advantages, including the ability to update financial data and track expenses instantly, making them a popular choice for individuals and businesses seeking flexible financial management solutions. These apps offer real-time updates, allowing users to easily monitor their financial needs and progress toward financial goals. With digital financial services becoming increasingly prevalent, cloud-based apps play a crucial role in the financial ecosystem by providing users with easy access to their financial data for effective financial management.
Get a glance at the market report of share of various segments Request Free Sample
The cloud-based segment was valued at USD 189.20 million in 2019 a
Facebook
TwitterIn 2024/25 the government of the United Kingdom is expected to spend approximately *****billion British pounds on housing benefits, compared with *****billion in the previous year.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This study develops an open economy version of the Dalgaard and Strulik (2014) health deficit model to examine how rising health expenditures affect international capital flows, external balances, and welfare. The government issues bonds in international capital markets, linking health policy to international financial dynamics. Calibrated to the UK, the model evaluates income growth, medical innovation, and population aging shocks under balanced budget and deficit spending regimes. Results show that the source of health spending growth determines the direction of capital flows, and that deficit-financed health spending generally yields higher welfare by enabling additional health investment without higher domestic taxation.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
In the modern age, gender-based budgeting is influenced by the growing consciousness of different sections of society. Indian society is divided into different castes, religions, and sects. In all of this, the expectation of equality and the consciousness to fulfill it seem to have been created. Considering the Indian economy, the concept of a gender-based budget has come to the fore these days. Through this, the nation and the state are trying to extend the benefits of the government scheme to the women in the society and to bridge the gender gap between men and women. Gender-based budgeting does not mean creating a separate budget for women but trying to address social and gender inequalities by adjusting to the main budget. At the experimental level, the first gender-based budget was introduced in Australia in 1980. Since then, gender-based budgets have been used in the UK in 1989 and now in 70 countries around the world. At present, welfare has taken the place of empowerment in India due to the changing times and that is why in the 9th Five Year Plan, Rs 30 crore was distributed in the country in the form of various schemes for women in the form of gender-based budget. In 2001, the Government of India declared 'Women's Empowerment Year' and gave priority to women's development in the country.
Facebook
TwitterIn 2024/25 the United Kingdom spent an estimated 313 billion British pounds on welfare, compared with 297 billion pounds in the previous year.