As of February 2025, the largest fine issued for violation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the United Kingdom (UK) was more than 22 million euros, received by British Airways in October 2020. Another fine received by Marriott International Inc. in the same month was the second-highest in the UK and amounted to over 20 million euros.

A survey conducted in April and May 2023 revealed that around ** percent of the companies that do business in the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom (UK) found it challenging to adapt to new or changing requirements of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA). A further ** percent of the survey respondents said it was challenging to increase the budget because of the changes in the data privacy laws.

In the United Kingdom, consumer concerns around use of personal data by companies centered on more accountability from the side of the companies, according to a survey conducted among internet users in the UK. ** percent of respondents said they thought companies should be held accountable in the case of data misuse. Another ** percent of consumers who took part in the survey said they wanted to see transparency on marketing and advertising practices carried out by companies.

A survey conducted in April and May 2023 among companies that do business in the European Union and the United Kingdom (UK) found that over half of the respondents, 53 percent, felt very prepared for the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). A further 35 percent of the companies believed they were moderately prepared, while 10 percent said they were slightly ready to comply with the EU and UK privacy legislations.

Whilst this some of the requested information is held by the NHSBSA, we have exempted some of the figures under section 40(2) subsections 2 and 3(a) of the FOIA because it is personal data of applicants to the VDPS. This is because it would breach the first data protection principle as: a - it is not fair to disclose individual’s personal details to the world and is likely to cause damage or distress. b - these details are not of sufficient interest to the public to warrant an intrusion into the privacy of the individual. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/36/section/40 Information Commissioner Office (ICO) Guidance is that information is personal data if it ‘relates to’ an ‘identifiable individual’ regulated by the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) or the Data Protection Act 2018. The information relates to personal data of the VDPS claimants and is special category data in the form of health information. As a result, the claimants could be identified, when combined with other information that may be in the public domain or reasonably available. Online communities exist for those adversely affected by vaccines they have received. This further increases the likelihood that those may be identified by disclosure of this information. Section 40(2) is an absolute, prejudice-based exemption and therefore is exempt if disclosure would contravene any of the data protection principles. To comply with the lawfulness, fairness, and transparency data protection principle, we either need the consent of the data subject(s) or there must be a legitimate interest in disclosure. In addition, the disclosure must be necessary to meet the legitimate interest and finally, the disclosure must not cause unwarranted harm. The NHSBSA has considered this and does not have the consent of the data subjects to release this information and believes that it would not be possible to obtain consent that meets the threshold in Article 7 of the UK GDPR. The NHSBSA acknowledges that you have a legitimate interest in disclosure of the information to provide the full picture of data held by the NHSBSA; however, we have concluded that disclosure of the requested information would cause unwarranted harm and therefore, section 40(2) is engaged. This is because there is a reasonable expectation that patient data processed by the NHSBSA remains confidential, especially special category data. There are no reasonable alternative measures that could meet the legitimate aim. As the information is highly confidential and sensitive, it outweighs the legitimate interest in the information. Section 41 FOIA This information is also exempt under section 41 of the FOIA (information provided in confidence). This is because the requested information was provided to the NHSBSA in confidence by a third party - another individual, company, public authority or any other type of legal entity. In this instance, details have been provided by the claimants. For Section 41 to be engaged, the following criteria must be fulfilled:

HitHorizons UK B2B Data gives access to aggregated company data on 80M+ companies from the whole of Europe and beyond.

Company registration data: company name national identifier and its type registered address: street, postal code, city, state / province, country business activity: SIC code, local activity code with classification system year of establishment company type location type

Sales and number of employees data: sales in EUR, USD and local currency (with local currency code) total number of employees sales and number of employees accuracy local number of employees (in case of multiple branches) companies’ sales and number of employees market position compared to other companies in a country / industry / region

Industry data: size of the whole industry size of all companies operating within a particular SIC code benchmarking within a particular country or industry regional benchmarking (EU 27, state / province)

Contact details: company website company email domain (without person’s name)

Invoicing details available for selected countries: company name company address company VAT number.

With the implementation of GDPR in the European Union as of ************, concerns have surfaced about collecting and using consumer data across all types of organizations. In the retail sector, GDPR proves to be a challenge in front of personalization services provided by e-commerce and multichannel retailers. In the UK and France, ** percent of retailers believed GDPR will have a big impact on reaching consistent database communities and sharing info with third parties. In a similar fashion, more than half of respondents said gathering useful data on consumers will be impacted by GDPR.

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic brought global disruption to health, society and economy, including to the conduct of clinical research. In the European Union (EU), the legal and ethical framework for research is complex and divergent. Many challenges exist in relation to the interplay of the various applicable rules, particularly with respect to compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This study aimed to gain insights into the experience of key clinical research stakeholders [investigators, ethics committees (ECs), and data protection officers (DPOs)/legal experts working with clinical research sponsors] across the EU and the UK on the main challenges related to data protection in clinical research before and during the pandemic.Materials and methodsThe study consisted of an online survey and follow-up semi-structured interviews. Data collection occurred between April and December 2021. Survey data was analyzed descriptively, and the interviews underwent a framework analysis.Results and conclusionIn total, 191 respondents filled in the survey, of whom fourteen participated in the follow-up interviews. Out of the targeted 28 countries (EU and UK), 25 were represented in the survey. The majority of stakeholders were based in Western Europe. This study empirically elucidated numerous key legal and ethical issues related to GDPR compliance in the context of (cross-border) clinical research. It showed that the lack of legal harmonization remains the biggest challenge in the field, and that it is present not only at the level of the interplay of key EU legislative acts and national implementation of the GDPR, but also when it comes to interpretation at local, regional and institutional levels. Moreover, the role of ECs in data protection was further explored and possible ways forward for its normative delineation were discussed. According to the participants, the pandemic did not bring additional legal challenges. Although practical challenges (for instance, mainly related to the provision of information to patients) were high due to the globally enacted crisis measures, the key problematic issues on (cross-border) health research, interpretations of the legal texts and compliance strategies remained largely the same.

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic brought global disruption to health, society and economy, including to the conduct of clinical research. In the European Union (EU), the legal and ethical framework for research is complex and divergent. Many challenges exist in relation to the interplay of the various applicable rules, particularly with respect to compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This study aimed to gain insights into the experience of key clinical research stakeholders [investigators, ethics committees (ECs), and data protection officers (DPOs)/legal experts working with clinical research sponsors] across the EU and the UK on the main challenges related to data protection in clinical research before and during the pandemic.Materials and methodsThe study consisted of an online survey and follow-up semi-structured interviews. Data collection occurred between April and December 2021. Survey data was analyzed descriptively, and the interviews underwent a framework analysis.Results and conclusionIn total, 191 respondents filled in the survey, of whom fourteen participated in the follow-up interviews. Out of the targeted 28 countries (EU and UK), 25 were represented in the survey. The majority of stakeholders were based in Western Europe. This study empirically elucidated numerous key legal and ethical issues related to GDPR compliance in the context of (cross-border) clinical research. It showed that the lack of legal harmonization remains the biggest challenge in the field, and that it is present not only at the level of the interplay of key EU legislative acts and national implementation of the GDPR, but also when it comes to interpretation at local, regional and institutional levels. Moreover, the role of ECs in data protection was further explored and possible ways forward for its normative delineation were discussed. According to the participants, the pandemic did not bring additional legal challenges. Although practical challenges (for instance, mainly related to the provision of information to patients) were high due to the globally enacted crisis measures, the key problematic issues on (cross-border) health research, interpretations of the legal texts and compliance strategies remained largely the same.

With this dataset, you get access to names of officers – individuals appointed by the board of directors to manage the day-to-day operations of a company, and shareholders – individuals or entities that own shares in a company.

This dataset can be a great resource for understanding the corporate hierarchy, analyzing ownership structures, conducting due diligence, or evaluating potential business partnerships.

Since the enforcement of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in May 2018, fines have been issued for several types of violations. As of February 2025, the most significant share of penalties was due to companies' non-compliance with general data processing principles. This violation has led to over 2.4 billion euros worth of fines.

Deze dataset is een centrale catalogus van Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIA's) van smart city-projecten die persoonlijke informatie verzamelen in openbare ruimtes. Door dit voor het eerst op één plaats te publiceren, zal het publieke transparantie mogelijk maken en goede praktijken onder exploitanten ondersteunen.

Een DPIA helpt bij het identificeren en minimaliseren van de risico's van een project dat persoonsgegevens gebruikt.

DPIA registratieformulier: "https://www.london.gov.uk/dpia-register-form" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(158, 0, 98);">https://www.london.gov.uk/dpia-register-form

Informatiecommissaris DPIA: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/accountability-and-governance/data-protection-impact-assessments/

Deze dataset is een centrale catalogus van Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIA's) van smart city-projecten die persoonlijke informatie verzamelen in openbare ruimtes. Door dit voor het eerst op één plaats te publiceren, zal het publieke transparantie mogelijk maken en goede praktijken onder exploitanten ondersteunen.

Een DPIA helpt bij het identificeren en minimaliseren van de risico's van een project dat persoonsgegevens gebruikt.

DPIA registratieformulier: "https://www.london.gov.uk/dpia-register-form" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(158, 0, 98);">https://www.london.gov.uk/dpia-register-form

Informatiecommissaris DPIA: "https://data.london.gov.uk/dpia/_wp_link_placeholder" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(158, 0, 98);">https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/accountability-and-governance/data-protection-impact-assessments/

Question 2 National Audit Office (NAO) are the auditors of the NHS Pension Scheme Accounts. The main contact at NAO has not consented to the disclosure and is therefore exempt under 40 subsections 2 and 3A (a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, as disclosure of this information would be unfair and as such this would breach the UK GDPR first data protection principle because: a) it is not fair to disclose main contact of the NAO personal details to the world and is likely to cause damage or distress. b) these details are not of sufficient interest to the public to warrant an intrusion into the privacy of the main contact of the NAO. NAO have provided the name of the Auditor General, Gareth Davies Government Internal Audit Agency (GIAA) currently provide Internal Audit for the NHSBSA. This includes the following areas of NHS pensions for 2023/24: Member Data McCloud and other Legislative Changes . Pensions Annual Allowance Charge Compensation Scheme (PAACCS) My NHS Pensions Portal Government Internal Audit Agency (GIAA) - The main contact at GIAA has not consented to the disclosure and is therefore exempt under 40 subsections 2 and 3A (a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, as disclosure of this information would be unfair and as such this would breach the UK GDPR first data protection principle because: a) it is not fair to disclose main contact of the Government Internal Audit Agency’s personal details to the world and is likely to cause damage or distress. b) these details are not of sufficient interest to the public to warrant an intrusion into the privacy of the main contact of the Government Internal Audit Agency. Please click the below web link to see the exemption in full. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/36/section/40 Question 3 National Audit Office (NAO) National Audit Office 157-197 Buckingham Palace Road London SW1W 9SP Government Internal Audit Agency (GIAA) Governance Team Corporate Services Directorate Government Internal Audit Agency 10 Victoria Street Westminster London SW1H 0NB United Kingdom Question 4

The dataset contains news articles from French, German, UK, and US sources about GDPR media discourse.

The European Data Protection-as-a-Service (DPaaS) market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach €5.98 billion in 2025 and maintain a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 14.60% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is driven by several key factors. Increasing data volumes, stringent data privacy regulations like GDPR, and the rising adoption of cloud computing are compelling organizations across various sectors—particularly BFSI, Healthcare, Government & Defense, and IT & Telecom—to leverage DPaaS solutions for enhanced data security and compliance. The market's segmentation reveals strong demand for Storage-as-a-Service (StaaS), Backup-as-a-Service (BaaS), and Disaster Recovery-as-a-Service (DRaaS), with public cloud deployment models gaining significant traction due to their scalability and cost-effectiveness. The competitive landscape is marked by a blend of established technology giants like IBM, Amazon Web Services, and Dell Technologies, alongside specialized DPaaS providers. The presence of these players fuels innovation and drives market growth through continuous improvements in service offerings and technological advancements. Looking ahead, the European DPaaS market is poised for continued expansion. The increasing sophistication of cyber threats and the need for robust data protection strategies will further accelerate market adoption. While challenges exist, such as the complexities of integrating DPaaS solutions with existing IT infrastructure and concerns regarding data sovereignty, the overall market outlook remains positive. The expansion of 5G networks and the growth of the Internet of Things (IoT) are expected to generate even larger data volumes, further fueling demand for efficient and secure DPaaS solutions. The focus will likely shift towards enhanced data security features, improved compliance capabilities, and more flexible and integrated service models in the coming years. Growth in specific regions within Europe, particularly the UK, Germany, and France, will likely outpace others due to higher levels of digitalization and stringent data regulations. Recent developments include: July 2023 - Thales, a France-based IT company, introduced the CipherTrust Data Security Platform to the market, and the company currently offers it through a cloud-based subscription-as-a-service model. According to Thales, the platform simplifies data security operations for organizations by utilizing data security and lifecycle management tools to help them defend against external cyber threats and other security risks. Additionally, the platform gives users access to a partner ecosystem for integrations with security vendors, enterprise storage, servers, databases, applications, and clouds., June 2023 - Oracle's EU Sovereign Cloud was announced to be accessible, providing more control over data privacy and sovereignty needs to public and commercial sector entities throughout the European Union. Oracle EU Sovereign Cloud, one of the first cloud offerings created to address the EU's developing regulatory landscape, provides users with all the services and capabilities of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure's (OCI) public cloud regions at the identical cost, with the same level of support and service level agreements (SLAs) to run any workload. In addition to dedicated and hybrid cloud solutions, EU Sovereign Cloud, a component of OCI's distributed cloud approach, offers a new way to assist in meeting regulatory requirements.. Key drivers for this market are: Increasing Focus on Third-party Risk Management, Stringent Regulations, such as GDPR Prompting the Adoption of Data Protection Solutions; Increasing Awareness among EU Institutions. Potential restraints include: Increasing Focus on Third-party Risk Management, Stringent Regulations, such as GDPR Prompting the Adoption of Data Protection Solutions; Increasing Awareness among EU Institutions. Notable trends are: BFSI Industry is Expected to Grow at a Significant Rate Throughout the Forecast Period.

The UK cybersecurity insurance market, a segment within the broader global market valued at $1.35 billion in 2025 with a 13.40% CAGR, is experiencing robust growth driven by escalating cyber threats targeting businesses of all sizes. Increased frequency and severity of ransomware attacks, data breaches, and compliance failures are compelling organizations to prioritize cyber risk mitigation, fueling demand for comprehensive insurance coverage. The market is segmented by product type (packaged and standalone policies) and application type (banking & financial services, IT & telecom, healthcare, retail, and others). Major players like AIG, Allianz, Beazley, Hiscox, and Marsh dominate the landscape, offering a range of solutions tailored to specific industry needs. The UK market benefits from a sophisticated regulatory environment and a high level of digital adoption, further propelling insurance uptake. However, challenges remain, including the complexity of assessing and pricing cyber risks, a lack of standardized policies, and the potential for significant payouts in the event of major breaches. Given the global CAGR of 13.40% and the UK's prominent position in the global financial and technological sectors, the UK market is likely to experience growth exceeding the global average. Specific growth drivers for the UK include strong government initiatives promoting cybersecurity awareness and regulations like the GDPR, which increase the liability of companies failing to protect data. The rise of cloud computing and the Internet of Things (IoT) also contributes to increased vulnerabilities and higher insurance demand. The market's segmentation reflects the varied risk profiles across different sectors. For instance, the financial services sector will likely show higher insurance penetration due to stricter regulatory requirements and greater exposure to financial crimes. The competitive landscape indicates considerable investment and innovation in product development and risk management techniques, leading to more specialized and effective insurance solutions. Recent developments include: September 2023: Cowbell is committed to addressing cyber risk challenges on a global scale, and our expansion into the UK is a testament to this. Cowbell Prime One is tailored towards SME and mid-market customers and allows brokers to customize cyber policies for different risk exposures, such as email scams, ransomware, and social engineering., March 2023: Cyber insurance provider Coalition is set to enter the excess cyber insurance market in the United Kingdom to help protect businesses with enhanced coverage. The firm has confirmed that it will extend its reach to provide full-follow form coverage and protection of up to GBP 10 million (USD 12126000) above a primary layer of insurance from another insurer for both cyber and technology professional indemnity (PI) lines.. Key drivers for this market are: Data Privacy Regulations, Business Interruption. Potential restraints include: Data Privacy Regulations, Business Interruption. Notable trends are: Impact of Cyber Insurance Policy Coverage.

Between 2018 and 2022, there has been a significant increase in the level of awareness around the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) among European users. In 2018, when the GDPR was first applied, the United Kingdom had the highest level of awareness, with 32 percent of respondents agreeing or strongly agreeing with the statement: "I am aware of the new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) that will be introduced in May 2018". In 2022, the share of UK respondents agreeing with the statement increased to 73 percent. France had the lowest level of awareness in 2018, 20 percent, whereas in 2022 it reached 47 percent but remained the lowest among other European markets.

Een Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) is een van de manieren om erachter te komen welke privacyrisico’s mensen lopen wanneer informatie over hen wordt verzameld, gebruikt, opgeslagen of gedeeld. Dit helpt de Londense gemeente Barnet problemen te vinden zodat risico’s kunnen worden weggenomen of verlaagd tot een aanvaardbaar niveau. Het bezuinigt ook op inbreuken op de privacy en klachten die de reputatie van de Raad kunnen schaden of leiden tot actie van de Information Commissioner (de waakhond van de regering). De London Borough of Barnet maakt DPIA’s openbaar in zijn Data Charter en de Data Protection Act 2018 en UK GDPR. Een Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) is een van de manieren om erachter te komen welke privacyrisico’s mensen lopen wanneer informatie over hen wordt verzameld, gebruikt, opgeslagen of gedeeld. Dit helpt de Londense gemeente Barnet problemen te vinden zodat risico’s kunnen worden weggenomen of verlaagd tot een aanvaardbaar niveau. Het bezuinigt ook op inbreuken op de privacy en klachten die de reputatie van de Raad kunnen schaden of leiden tot actie van de Information Commissioner (de waakhond van de regering).

De London Borough of Barnet maakt DPIA’s openbaar in zijn Data Charter en de Data Protection Act 2018 en UK GDPR.