3 datasets found
  1. f

    Data_Sheet_1_How Well Can Multivariate and Univariate GWAS Distinguish...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    pdf
    Updated Jun 2, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Samuel B. Fernandes; Kevin S. Zhang; Tiffany M. Jamann; Alexander E. Lipka (2023). Data_Sheet_1_How Well Can Multivariate and Univariate GWAS Distinguish Between True and Spurious Pleiotropy?.PDF [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.602526.s001
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Samuel B. Fernandes; Kevin S. Zhang; Tiffany M. Jamann; Alexander E. Lipka
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Quantification of the simultaneous contributions of loci to multiple traits, a phenomenon called pleiotropy, is facilitated by the increased availability of high-throughput genotypic and phenotypic data. To understand the prevalence and nature of pleiotropy, the ability of multivariate and univariate genome-wide association study (GWAS) models to distinguish between pleiotropic and non-pleiotropic loci in linkage disequilibrium (LD) first needs to be evaluated. Therefore, we used publicly available maize and soybean genotypic data to simulate multiple pairs of traits that were either (i) controlled by quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs) on separate chromosomes, (ii) controlled by QTNs in various degrees of LD with each other, or (iii) controlled by a single pleiotropic QTN. We showed that multivariate GWAS could not distinguish between QTNs in LD and a single pleiotropic QTN. In contrast, a unique QTN detection rate pattern was observed for univariate GWAS whenever the simulated QTNs were in high LD or pleiotropic. Collectively, these results suggest that multivariate and univariate GWAS should both be used to infer whether or not causal mutations underlying peak GWAS associations are pleiotropic. Therefore, we recommend that future studies use a combination of multivariate and univariate GWAS models, as both models could be useful for identifying and narrowing down candidate loci with potential pleiotropic effects for downstream biological experiments.

  2. Data_Sheet_1_A mixture of mobility and meteorological data provides a high...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    pdf
    Updated Mar 7, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    David Conesa; Víctor López de Rioja; Tania Gullón; Adriá Tauste Campo; Clara Prats; Enrique Alvarez-Lacalle; Blas Echebarria (2024). Data_Sheet_1_A mixture of mobility and meteorological data provides a high correlation with COVID-19 growth in an infection-naive population: a study for Spanish provinces.PDF [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1288531.s001
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 7, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers Mediahttp://www.frontiersin.org/
    Authors
    David Conesa; Víctor López de Rioja; Tania Gullón; Adriá Tauste Campo; Clara Prats; Enrique Alvarez-Lacalle; Blas Echebarria
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    IntroductionWe use Spanish data from August 2020 to March 2021 as a natural experiment to analyze how a standardized measure of COVID-19 growth correlates with asymmetric meteorological and mobility situations in 48 Spanish provinces. The period of time is selected prior to vaccination so that the level of susceptibility was high, and during geographically asymmetric implementation of non-pharmacological interventions.MethodsWe develop reliable aggregated mobility data from different public sources and also compute the average meteorological time series of temperature, dew point, and UV radiance in each Spanish province from satellite data. We perform a dimensionality reduction of the data using principal component analysis and investigate univariate and multivariate correlations of mobility and meteorological data with COVID-19 growth.ResultsWe find significant, but generally weak, univariate correlations for weekday aggregated mobility in some, but not all, provinces. On the other hand, principal component analysis shows that the different mobility time series can be properly reduced to three time series. A multivariate time-lagged canonical correlation analysis of the COVID-19 growth rate with these three time series reveals a highly significant correlation, with a median R-squared of 0.65. The univariate correlation between meteorological data and COVID-19 growth is generally not significant, but adding its two main principal components to the mobility multivariate analysis increases correlations significantly, reaching correlation coefficients between 0.6 and 0.98 in all provinces with a median R-squared of 0.85. This result is robust to different approaches in the reduction of dimensionality of the data series.DiscussionOur results suggest an important effect of mobility on COVID-19 cases growth rate. This effect is generally not observed for meteorological variables, although in some Spanish provinces it can become relevant. The correlation between mobility and growth rate is maximal at a time delay of 2-3 weeks, which agrees well with the expected 5?10 day delays between infection, development of symptoms, and the detection/report of the case.

  3. DataSheet1_Nexus between health poverty and climatic variability in...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    pdf
    Updated Jun 2, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sami Ullah Khan; Muhammad Ramzan Sheikh; Levente Dimen; Hafsah Batool; Asad Abbas; Alina Cristina Nuta (2023). DataSheet1_Nexus between health poverty and climatic variability in Pakistan: a geospatial analysis.PDF [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1180556.s001
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers Mediahttp://www.frontiersin.org/
    Authors
    Sami Ullah Khan; Muhammad Ramzan Sheikh; Levente Dimen; Hafsah Batool; Asad Abbas; Alina Cristina Nuta
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Pakistan
    Description

    Studies investigating the interconnection of health poverty and climatic variability are rare in spatial perspectives. Given the importance of sustainable development goals 3, goal 10, and goal 13, we explored whether the geographic regions with diverse climate structure has a spatial association with health poverty; whether spatial disparities exist across districts of Pakistan. We implied the A-F methodology to estimate the MHP index using the PSLM survey, 2019–20. The climate variables were extracted from the online NASA website. We applied the spatial techniques of Moran’s I, univariate and bivariate LISA, to address the research questions. The findings revealed that the magnitude of MHP differs across districts. Punjab was found to be the better-ff whereas Baluchistan was the highest health poverty-stricken province. The spatial results indicated positive associations of MHP and climate indicators with their values in the neighbors, whereas a negative spatial association was found between the MHP and climate indicators. Also, spatial clusters and outliers of higher MHP were significant in Baluchistan and KP provinces. Government intervention and policymaker’s prioritization are needed towards health and health-related social indicators, mainly in the high poverty-stricken districts, with high temperature and low humidity and precipitation rates, especially in Baluchistan.

  4. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Samuel B. Fernandes; Kevin S. Zhang; Tiffany M. Jamann; Alexander E. Lipka (2023). Data_Sheet_1_How Well Can Multivariate and Univariate GWAS Distinguish Between True and Spurious Pleiotropy?.PDF [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.602526.s001

Data_Sheet_1_How Well Can Multivariate and Univariate GWAS Distinguish Between True and Spurious Pleiotropy?.PDF

Related Article
Explore at:
pdfAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jun 2, 2023
Dataset provided by
Frontiers
Authors
Samuel B. Fernandes; Kevin S. Zhang; Tiffany M. Jamann; Alexander E. Lipka
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

Quantification of the simultaneous contributions of loci to multiple traits, a phenomenon called pleiotropy, is facilitated by the increased availability of high-throughput genotypic and phenotypic data. To understand the prevalence and nature of pleiotropy, the ability of multivariate and univariate genome-wide association study (GWAS) models to distinguish between pleiotropic and non-pleiotropic loci in linkage disequilibrium (LD) first needs to be evaluated. Therefore, we used publicly available maize and soybean genotypic data to simulate multiple pairs of traits that were either (i) controlled by quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs) on separate chromosomes, (ii) controlled by QTNs in various degrees of LD with each other, or (iii) controlled by a single pleiotropic QTN. We showed that multivariate GWAS could not distinguish between QTNs in LD and a single pleiotropic QTN. In contrast, a unique QTN detection rate pattern was observed for univariate GWAS whenever the simulated QTNs were in high LD or pleiotropic. Collectively, these results suggest that multivariate and univariate GWAS should both be used to infer whether or not causal mutations underlying peak GWAS associations are pleiotropic. Therefore, we recommend that future studies use a combination of multivariate and univariate GWAS models, as both models could be useful for identifying and narrowing down candidate loci with potential pleiotropic effects for downstream biological experiments.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu