19 datasets found
  1. f

    DataSheet_1_Advancing fence datasets: Comparing approaches to map fence...

    • figshare.com
    pdf
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Simon A. Buzzard; Andrew F. Jakes; Amy J. Pearson; Len Broberg (2023). DataSheet_1_Advancing fence datasets: Comparing approaches to map fence locations and specifications in southwest Montana.pdf [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2022.958729.s001
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Simon A. Buzzard; Andrew F. Jakes; Amy J. Pearson; Len Broberg
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Montana
    Description

    Fencing is a major anthropogenic feature affecting wildlife distributions and movements, but its impacts are difficult to quantify due to a widespread lack of spatial data. We created a fence model and compared outputs to a fence mapping approach using satellite imagery in two counties in southwest Montana, USA to advance fence data development for use in research and management. The model incorporated road, land cover, ownership, and grazing boundary spatial layers to predict fence locations. We validated the model using data collected on randomized road transects (n = 330). The model predicted ~34,700 km of fences with a mean fence density of 0.93 km/km2 and a maximum density of 14.9 km/km2. We also digitized fences using Google Earth Pro in a random subset of our study area in survey townships (n = 50). The Google Earth approach showed greater agreement (K = 0.76) with known samples than the fence model (K = 0.56) yet was unable to map fences in forests and was significantly more time intensive. We also compared fence attributes by land ownership and land cover variables to assess factors that may influence fence specifications (e.g., wire heights) and types (e.g., number of barbed wires). Private land fences had bottom wires that were closer to the ground and top wires higher from the ground when compared to fences on public lands, with sample means at ~22 cm and ~26 cm, and ~115 cm and ~111 cm, respectively. Both bottom wire means were well below recommended heights for ungulates navigating underneath fencing (≥ 46 cm), while top wire means were closer to the 107 cm maximum fence height recommendation. We found that both fence type and land ownership were correlated (χ2 = 45.52, df = 5, p = 0.001) as well as fence type and land cover type (χ2 = 140.73, df = 15, p = 0.001). We provide tools for estimating fence locations, and our novel fence type assessment demonstrates an opportunity for updated policy to encourage the adoption of “wildlife-friendlier” fencing standards to facilitate wildlife movement in the western U.S. while supporting rural livelihoods.

  2. o

    Data from: Animal use of fence crossings in Southwestern Rangelands

    • explore.openaire.eu
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Oct 5, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Lisa Zoromski (2022). Animal use of fence crossings in Southwestern Rangelands [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7145483
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 5, 2022
    Authors
    Lisa Zoromski
    Description

    Fence description and condition We surveyed boundary net-wire fence lines at both sites to verify the presence of intact, maintained fences, with ≤7 cm between the bottom fence wire and the ground. We randomly selected a 9,146-m boundary fence at El Sauz and a 2,174-m boundary fence at Santa Rosa; fence lengths differed because of the configuration of the property boundaries. Boundary fences were selected over interior fences because they often form long, linear features with no openings (e.g., gates). Therefore, animals must go under or over the wire to pass beyond the fence. Both fence lines were standard net-wire livestock fences 1.25 m in height. Both fences had an unpaved 2-track road on both sides, with mesquite and huisache woodlands beyond the roads, except for the exterior side of the fence at Santa Rosa which was grassland. We drove a utility vehicle along target fence lines at each study site to identify and record fence-crossing locations. At each identified crossing location, we recorded the maximum height of the bottom wire (m), and width (m) of each opening. We conducted these surveys of fence-crossing locations during Autumn (October – November) 2017, 2018, and Spring (April – early June) 2018, 2019. We then calculated the opening size of each crossing (m2) as the maximum height multiplied by width. When fence crossings become large enough for livestock to pass through, a common practice at these study sites is to patch the hole by securing a panel of net-wire livestock fence over the opening to discourage further crossings. Therefore, we also recorded fence-crossing locations in relation to previous repairs or patched locations. Landscape features Landscape features can influence wildlife habitat use (Van Dorp and Opdam 1987, Thogmartin 2001, Zemanova et al. 2017), and thus may influence where animals choose to cross fences. We quantified woody cover at fence-crossing locations using a spatial pattern analysis in ArcGIS ArcMap 10.5.1 (ESRI©, Redlands, CA) FRAGSTATS 4.2 (McGarigal et al. 2012) based on high-resolution (1-m) aerial multispectral images from the National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) for 2016. We first classified imagery into 4 land cover types: woody cover, herbaceous, bare ground, and water using unsupervised image classification in ERDAS Imagine 2018 (Hexagon Geospatial; Norcross, GA; Xie et al. 2008). We conducted an accuracy assessment with 200 random points per image until ≥85% accuracy was achieved (Jensen 2016, Pulighe et al. 2016). We created 30-m buffers at fence-crossing locations and at an equal number of random locations on the same fence line at both sites. We focused on woody cover, as the most common cover types were woody and herbaceous; there was no permanent water near the boundary fencing, and bare ground was sporadic and ephemeral. At El Sauz, random locations were adjusted to not overlap other known or random crossing buffers. This approach was not feasible on Santa Rosa because crossings were relatively abundant. We clipped the imagery to the extent of the buffers to quantify the amount and spatial structure of woody cover within buffer areas. We characterized woody cover using 6 landscape metrics (McGarigal et al. 2012): patch density (PD, number of woody patches/100 ha), percentage of the landscape in woody cover (PLAND %), the mean area of woody patches (AREA_MN), the Euclidean nearest-neighbor distance between woody patches (ENN, m), the aggregation index (AI, frequency which like patches appear side by side, %) and edge density (ED, edge length of woody cover patches per unit area, m/ha). Crossing-site usage To assess the usage of each crossing location at each study site, we randomly assigned 10 camera traps to fence crossings identified through the fence surveys (Reconyx© HyperFire HC500 or XR6 UltraFire, Reconyx, Holmen, WI; Moultrie© A-5 Gen2 MCG-12688 Moultrie feeders, Alabaster, AL). We fastened cameras onto 1.5-m metal t-posts at a mean height (±SE) above ground of 0.54 ± 0.02 m (range 0.43–0.63) at El Sauz, and 0.66 ± 0.03 m (range 0.40–0.80) at Santa Rosa. The mean distance (±SE) from the t-post to crossing was 3.00 ± 0.12 m (range 2.40–3.58) at El Sauz and 1.72 ± 0.15 m (range 1.04–2.80) at Santa Rosa. The boundary fence at Santa Rosa often had an unpaved 2-track road close to the fence and we could not place cameras on the road; thus, the distance between the crossing and the site of camera placement was shorter than for El Sauz. We placed the cameras higher up to angle down at the crossings to address the reduced distances between cameras and fence crossings. The cameras were focused on crossing locations where wildlife crawled underneath fencing. Depressions on the top wire of these fences were rare, so we did not assess jumps over the fence by deer or nilgai. We first deployed cameras in January 2018 as a pilot study to assess camera placement and photo quality. During the pilot study, on March 28, 2018, two fence crossings wer...

  3. N

    Income Distribution by Quintile: Mean Household Income in Fence, Wisconsin...

    • neilsberg.com
    csv, json
    Updated Mar 3, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Neilsberg Research (2025). Income Distribution by Quintile: Mean Household Income in Fence, Wisconsin // 2025 Edition [Dataset]. https://www.neilsberg.com/research/datasets/4822023c-f81d-11ef-a994-3860777c1fe6/
    Explore at:
    json, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 3, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Neilsberg Research
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Wisconsin, Fence
    Variables measured
    Income Level, Mean Household Income
    Measurement technique
    The data presented in this dataset is derived from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. It delineates income distributions across income quintiles (mentioned above) following an initial analysis and categorization. Subsequently, we adjusted these figures for inflation using the Consumer Price Index retroactive series via current methods (R-CPI-U-RS). For additional information about these estimations, please contact us via email at research@neilsberg.com
    Dataset funded by
    Neilsberg Research
    Description
    About this dataset

    Context

    The dataset presents the mean household income for each of the five quintiles in Fence, Wisconsin, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in mean household income across quintiles, offering valuable insights into income distribution and inequality.

    Key observations

    • Income disparities: The mean income of the lowest quintile (20% of households with the lowest income) is 19,189, while the mean income for the highest quintile (20% of households with the highest income) is 157,899. This indicates that the top earners earn 8 times compared to the lowest earners.
    • *Top 5%: * The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 214,900, which is 136.10% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 1119.91% higher compared to the lowest quintile.
    Content

    When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

    Income Levels:

    • Lowest Quintile
    • Second Quintile
    • Third Quintile
    • Fourth Quintile
    • Highest Quintile
    • Top 5 Percent

    Variables / Data Columns

    • Income Level: This column showcases the income levels (As mentioned above).
    • Mean Household Income: Mean household income, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific income level.

    Good to know

    Margin of Error

    Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

    Custom data

    If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

    Inspiration

    Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

    Recommended for further research

    This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Fence town median household income. You can refer the same here

  4. Athletic Field Fences Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Oct 5, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2024). Athletic Field Fences Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/athletic-field-fences-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, csv, pptxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 5, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Athletic Field Fences Market Outlook



    The global athletic field fences market size was valued at approximately USD 1.2 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 2.1 billion by 2032, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.3% during the forecast period. This market growth is primarily driven by increasing investments in sports infrastructure and the rising popularity of outdoor sports, which necessitate secure and durable fencing solutions for athletic fields.



    One of the primary growth factors for the athletic field fences market is the increasing global emphasis on health and fitness, which has led to a surge in the construction and renovation of sports facilities. Governments and private organizations are investing heavily in building new sports complexes, stadiums, and athletic fields to encourage physical activity and sports participation among the youth. Additionally, the rise in international sports events and local tournaments has necessitated the need for high-quality fencing solutions to ensure player and spectator safety.



    Technological advancements and innovations in fencing materials and installation techniques are further propelling market growth. Modern materials such as vinyl and coated chain link fences offer enhanced durability, weather resistance, and aesthetic appeal. These advancements are making it easier for facility managers to install and maintain fences that meet safety standards while also being cost-effective. Furthermore, the development of temporary and modular fencing solutions is addressing the demand for flexible and versatile options in various sporting events and venues.



    The growing trend of urbanization and the expansion of municipal parks and recreational areas also contribute significantly to market growth. Urban planners and local governments are increasingly incorporating sports and recreational facilities into urban development projects to promote community engagement and healthy lifestyles. As a result, there is a heightened demand for athletic field fences that can provide secure boundaries for sports activities in public spaces. This trend is particularly noticeable in emerging economies, where urban development is rapidly progressing.



    From a regional perspective, North America is expected to dominate the athletic field fences market, owing to the high concentration of sports facilities and an established sports culture. Europe follows closely, with significant investments in sports infrastructure driven by the popularity of various sports leagues and events. The Asia Pacific region is anticipated to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period, fueled by increasing investments in sports infrastructure and the rising popularity of sports activities in countries like China and India.



    Material Type Analysis



    The athletic field fences market can be segmented based on material type into chain link, welded wire, vinyl, wood, and others. Chain link fences are the most widely used fencing type due to their cost-effectiveness, durability, and ease of installation. These fences provide a strong and secure barrier that can withstand various weather conditions and physical impacts, making them ideal for athletic fields. The high demand for chain link fences is also driven by their low maintenance requirements and long lifespan.



    Welded wire fences are another popular choice, particularly for high-security applications. These fences are made by welding horizontal and vertical wires together, creating a strong mesh that is difficult to cut or climb. Welded wire fences are commonly used in professional sports stadiums and high-profile sports facilities where security is a top priority. The increasing need for enhanced security measures in athletic venues is driving the demand for welded wire fences in the market.



    Vinyl fences are gaining popularity due to their aesthetic appeal and durability. These fences are made from polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and are available in various colors and styles, allowing facility managers to choose designs that complement their sports facilities. Vinyl fences are resistant to weathering, corrosion, and UV radiation, making them a long-lasting and low-maintenance option for athletic fields. The rising preference for visually appealing and durable fencing solutions is boosting the demand for vinyl fences in the market.



    Wood fences, although less common in modern sports facilities, still hold a significant market share due to their traditional look and natural appearance. These fences are often used

  5. Metal Fence Panels Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Jan 7, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2025). Metal Fence Panels Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/metal-fence-panels-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, csv, pptxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 7, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Metal Fence Panels Market Outlook



    The global metal fence panels market size is projected to experience significant growth, with an estimated market size of USD 10.5 billion in 2023 and anticipated to reach approximately USD 18.2 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.2% during the forecast period. The increasing demand for security and aesthetic enhancement in residential, commercial, and industrial sectors is a major growth factor driving this market.



    One of the primary growth factors contributing to the expansion of the metal fence panels market is the rising need for improved security. As crime rates continue to rise globally, property owners are increasingly investing in secure fencing solutions. Metal fence panels offer robust and durable options compared to traditional wooden or plastic fences, which are more susceptible to damage and wear over time. Additionally, the versatility of metal in terms of design customization allows for both functional and decorative uses, further increasing its appeal in various applications.



    Another significant factor is the urbanization and infrastructural development taking place worldwide. Rapid urbanization in developing countries has led to increased construction activities, including residential complexes, commercial buildings, and industrial facilities. Metal fence panels are extensively used in these constructions due to their durability, low maintenance, and aesthetic appeal. Furthermore, government initiatives to develop smart cities are also expected to fuel the demand for metal fence panels, as these projects often include sophisticated security and infrastructure requirements.



    The growing awareness and preference for sustainable and eco-friendly building materials are also propelling the market. Metal fence panels, especially those made from recycled materials, are gaining traction as they align with global sustainability goals. These panels are not only recyclable but also have a longer lifespan, reducing the need for frequent replacements and minimizing waste. This sustainability aspect is becoming increasingly important for both consumers and regulatory bodies, thereby driving market growth.



    Metal Tubular Fences are becoming increasingly popular in both residential and commercial applications due to their blend of strength and aesthetic appeal. These fences are constructed using hollow metal tubes, which provide a lightweight yet sturdy barrier. The tubular design not only enhances the structural integrity of the fence but also allows for a variety of design options, making them a versatile choice for different architectural styles. Additionally, metal tubular fences are known for their durability and low maintenance requirements, making them an attractive option for property owners looking for long-lasting fencing solutions. Their ability to withstand harsh weather conditions without compromising on appearance further adds to their growing popularity in the market.



    From a regional perspective, North America and Europe are currently leading the market due to high demand for residential and commercial security solutions. However, the Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the fastest growth during the forecast period. Rapid urbanization, economic development, and increased construction activities in countries like China and India are key factors contributing to this growth. In addition, rising disposable incomes and changing lifestyles in these regions are leading to increased spending on home improvement and security solutions.



    Product Type Analysis



    The metal fence panels market is segmented by product type into steel fence panels, aluminum fence panels, iron fence panels, and others. Steel fence panels dominate the market due to their superior strength, durability, and resistance to harsh weather conditions. These panels are widely used in both residential and industrial applications where security is a top priority. The versatility of steel in terms of design and coating options also makes it a preferred choice among consumers looking for both functionality and aesthetic appeal.



    Aluminum fence panels are gaining popularity due to their lightweight nature and resistance to rust and corrosion. These panels are especially popular in coastal areas where exposure to salty air can cause other metals to deteriorate quickly. Aluminum panels are also easier to install and require less maintenance compared to their steel count

  6. F

    Fencing Equipment Market Report

    • datainsightsmarket.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Mar 7, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Data Insights Market (2025). Fencing Equipment Market Report [Dataset]. https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/reports/fencing-equipment-market-17203
    Explore at:
    doc, pdf, pptAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 7, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Data Insights Market
    License

    https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The global fencing equipment market, valued at $31.17 billion in 2025, is projected to experience robust growth, driven by a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 5.43% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. Increased infrastructure development globally, particularly in emerging economies, necessitates substantial fencing solutions for various applications. The rising demand for security and perimeter protection in residential, commercial, and industrial sectors is a significant driver. Furthermore, the growing agricultural sector, requiring fencing for livestock management and land division, contributes considerably to market growth. Government initiatives promoting infrastructure projects and stricter building codes further stimulate market demand. Technological advancements in fencing materials, such as the introduction of stronger, more durable, and aesthetically pleasing options like composite materials and high-tensile wire, are also driving market expansion. While fluctuating raw material prices and potential economic downturns could pose challenges, the overall market outlook remains positive due to the consistent demand for fencing across diverse sectors. Segment-wise, the residential sector currently holds a major share, reflecting the substantial need for home security and landscaping. However, the agricultural, military & defense, and energy sectors are poised for significant growth, particularly in developing nations with expanding agricultural practices and critical infrastructure projects. Geographically, North America and Europe currently dominate the market, but the Asia-Pacific region is projected to showcase considerable growth potential due to rapid urbanization and infrastructure development. Companies like Gregory Industries, Bekaert, and Ameristar Perimeter Security are major players, competing based on product innovation, pricing strategies, and geographic reach. The market’s evolution towards sustainable and eco-friendly fencing materials also presents significant opportunities for manufacturers who prioritize environmental concerns. Comprehensive Coverage Fencing Equipment Market Report (2019-2033) This comprehensive report provides an in-depth analysis of the global Fencing Equipment Market, offering valuable insights for stakeholders across the value chain. Covering the historical period (2019-2024), base year (2025), and forecast period (2025-2033), this report projects a market valuation exceeding several billion dollars by 2033. The study meticulously examines market segmentation by type (wood fencing, metal fencing, other types), end-user (residential, agricultural, military & defense, government, petroleum & chemicals, mining, energy & power, warehouse, other end-users), and key geographic regions. This report is a critical resource for businesses, investors, and researchers seeking to understand the dynamics and future trajectory of this important sector. Recent developments include: February 2023: Crossplane Capital ("Crossplane"), a Dallas-based private equity firm, declared that it joined forces with Sal Chavarria and the company's management to purchase a controlling stake in Viking Fence, a top provider of fence rentals, sanitation rentals, fence installations, and additional building products and services to commercial and residential markets all over Texas., February 2023: A well-known, market-leading provider of fences and related goods and services, Phoenix Fence Corp., announced that TriWest Capital Partners had acquired a controlling interest in the company. The company will continue to be managed by the current management group at Phoenix Fence. The USD 175 million Growth Fund's sixth platform investment by TriWest is Phoenix Fence (2021 vintage).. Key drivers for this market are: Government Investments in Infrastructure Projects, Such as Highways, Airports, and Railways, Often Require Fencing for Safety and Security, Advancements in Fencing Technologies, Such as Smart Fencing Systems With Integrated Surveillance and Alarm Systems, are Attracting Customers Looking for Enhanced Security Solutions. Potential restraints include: Soaring Prices of Raw Material, Increasing Competition from Low-cost Products. Notable trends are: The Fencing Market in North America is Witnessing the Highest Growth Rate.

  7. S

    Figure 6 PrimPol suppresses R-loop formation in association with DNA...

    • search.sourcedata.io
    zip
    Updated Nov 26, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Saša Švikovi; Alastair Crisp; Sue Mei Tan-Wong; Thomas, A. Guilliam; Aidan, J. Doherty; Nick, J Proudfoot; Guillaume Guilbaud; Julian, E. Sale (2018). : Figure 6-F [Dataset]. https://search.sourcedata.io/panel/cache/63980
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 26, 2018
    Authors
    Saša Švikovi; Alastair Crisp; Sue Mei Tan-Wong; Thomas, A. Guilliam; Aidan, J. Doherty; Nick, J Proudfoot; Guillaume Guilbaud; Julian, E. Sale
    License

    Attribution 2.0 (CC BY 2.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Variables measured
    R-loops, G4 motifs, multiple components
    Description

    F. Correlation between G4 motifs ([G3-5N1-7]4) and all genes (white bar), and genes with DRIP peaks in wild type (blue) and primpol cells (red). Data information: P values calculated with Mann-Whitney U test. In violin plots, bar = median; box = interquartile range (IQR); whiskers = upper and lower inner fences (1st / 3rd quartile + 1.5*IQR).. List of tagged entities: multiple components, G4 motifs, R-loops, PRIMPOL (ncbigene:201973), immunoprecipitation (bao:BAO_0002508)

  8. s

    A Review of the Babine River Counting Fence Biological Program 1987 and 1988...

    • data.skeenasalmon.info
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    A Review of the Babine River Counting Fence Biological Program 1987 and 1988 - Dataset - Skeena Salmon Data Catalogue [Dataset]. https://data.skeenasalmon.info/dataset/a-review-of-the-babine-river-counting-fence-biological-program-1987-and-1988
    Explore at:
    Area covered
    Babine River, Skeena River
    Description

    This data report contains daily fence counts for, sockeye, chinook, pink, coho and steelhead salmon (Oncorhynchus). Length, sex and where available age information for sockeye, pink, chinook and coho are presented as well. In 1987 1,307,852 large Sockeye , 638,641 jack sockeye, 711 large chinook, 513 jack chinook, 169,586 pink, 1,894 coho, and 12 Steelhead were enumerated as they passed through the counting fence. In 1988 1,408,879 large sockeye, 77,631 jack sockeye, 1,057 large chinook, 210 jack chinook, 59,765 pink 3,026 coho and 58 steelhead were counted. Population estimates for sockeye escapement to the upper and lower Babine River for 1987 and 1988 are also included.

  9. Aluminum Fence Gates Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Jan 7, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2025). Aluminum Fence Gates Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/aluminum-fence-gates-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, csv, pptxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 7, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Aluminum Fence Gates Market Outlook



    The global aluminum fence gates market size was valued at USD 4.8 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 7.3 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.8% during the forecast period. The market is driven by various factors including increasing urbanization, rising security concerns, and the aesthetic appeal of aluminum gates. The market's growth is further bolstered by technological advancements in manufacturing and increased investment in infrastructure development globally.



    One of the primary growth factors for the aluminum fence gates market is the surge in urbanization, particularly in emerging economies. The rapid expansion of urban areas necessitates advanced security solutions and aesthetically pleasing boundaries, thus driving the demand for aluminum fence gates. Additionally, aluminum's lightweight yet durable properties make it an ideal material for both residential and commercial applications. As urbanization continues to rise, the need for secure and stylish fencing solutions is expected to grow in parallel, propelling the market forward.



    Moreover, the rising security concerns across various sectors have significantly contributed to the market's expansion. With increasing incidents of trespassing, theft, and unauthorized access, both residential and commercial establishments are investing more in high-quality fencing solutions. Aluminum fence gates, known for their robustness and durability, are preferred choices for enhancing security measures. This trend is particularly notable in regions with higher crime rates, where the demand for reliable and sturdy fencing solutions is even more critical.



    The aesthetic appeal of aluminum fence gates is another significant growth driver. In modern architecture and landscaping, the integration of visually appealing elements is paramount. Aluminum gates provide a sleek and modern look, which enhances the overall appearance of properties. Their availability in various designs, finishes, and colors makes them suitable for a wide range of applications, from residential to industrial settings. This versatility not only meets the functional requirements but also caters to the aesthetic preferences of consumers, thereby boosting market growth.



    In addition to aluminum, Metal Fences have been gaining popularity due to their strength and durability. These fences are often preferred in areas where security is a top priority, as they provide a formidable barrier against unauthorized access. Metal fences can be customized in various styles and heights, making them suitable for both residential and commercial properties. The ability to withstand harsh weather conditions without significant wear and tear adds to their appeal. As urban areas continue to expand, the demand for metal fences as a reliable security solution is expected to rise, complementing the growth of the aluminum fence gates market.



    Regionally, North America and Europe are expected to dominate the aluminum fence gates market due to the high rate of urbanization, stringent security regulations, and consumer preference for aesthetic home improvement solutions. In the Asia Pacific region, rapid industrialization and urbanization, especially in countries like China and India, are anticipated to drive significant market growth. The Middle East & Africa and Latin America are also expected to witness robust growth due to increasing infrastructure development and rising security concerns.



    Product Type Analysis



    The aluminum fence gates market is segmented into residential, commercial, and industrial aluminum fence gates. Residential aluminum fence gates hold a significant market share owing to the growing demand for stylish and secure fencing solutions in homes. Homeowners prefer aluminum gates for their properties due to their durability and low maintenance requirements. The various designs and finishes available in the market cater to different aesthetic preferences, making them a popular choice among homeowners. Additionally, the increasing trend of home renovation and improvement activities is further driving the demand for residential aluminum fence gates.



    Commercial aluminum fence gates are also witnessing considerable growth due to the rising need for enhanced security in commercial establishments such as offices, shopping centers, and educational institutions. These gates are designed to provide robust security while

  10. Perimeter Security Fence Market Research Report 2033

    • growthmarketreports.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Jul 14, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Growth Market Reports (2025). Perimeter Security Fence Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/perimeter-security-fence-market
    Explore at:
    pptx, pdf, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 14, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Growth Market Reports
    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Perimeter Security Fence Market Outlook




    According to our latest research, the global perimeter security fence market size reached USD 27.8 billion in 2024, and is poised to expand at a CAGR of 6.2% from 2025 to 2033. By the end of 2033, the market is projected to achieve a value of USD 47.7 billion. This robust growth is primarily fueled by escalating security concerns among commercial, industrial, and government sectors, as well as rapid urbanization and infrastructure development worldwide. The market's expansion is further supported by ongoing advancements in fencing materials and integration with electronic security systems.




    A key growth driver for the perimeter security fence market is the increasing incidence of security breaches and property crimes globally. Organizations and property owners are investing heavily in advanced perimeter protection solutions to safeguard assets, infrastructure, and personnel. The proliferation of critical infrastructure projects, such as airports, power plants, and data centers, has further intensified the demand for robust fencing systems. As threats become more sophisticated, there is a marked shift toward technologically enhanced fencing solutions that integrate with surveillance, intrusion detection, and access control systems. This trend is particularly pronounced in regions experiencing heightened geopolitical tensions and a rise in organized crime, where perimeter security is a top priority.




    Another significant factor propelling market growth is the rapid pace of urbanization and industrialization, especially in emerging economies. As cities expand and new industrial zones are established, the need for effective perimeter security to protect assets and ensure the safety of residents and workers becomes paramount. The construction of commercial complexes, residential communities, and public infrastructure projects is creating new opportunities for perimeter security fence manufacturers. Additionally, the increasing adoption of smart city initiatives is driving demand for integrated security solutions, where fencing systems are a critical component of broader urban safety strategies. This convergence of urban planning and security technology is expected to sustain market momentum throughout the forecast period.




    Technological advancements in fencing materials and design are also shaping the perimeter security fence market landscape. Manufacturers are focusing on the development of high-strength, corrosion-resistant materials such as galvanized steel, aluminum alloys, and composite meshes. These innovations offer enhanced durability and lower maintenance costs, making them attractive to end-users across various sectors. Furthermore, the integration of electric fencing, sensor-based alarms, and automated access control systems is transforming traditional fencing into intelligent security barriers. This evolution is helping organizations achieve higher levels of protection while optimizing operational efficiency and reducing human intervention. The growing awareness about the long-term cost benefits of advanced fencing solutions is encouraging widespread adoption among both private and public sector entities.




    From a regional perspective, Asia Pacific is emerging as a dominant force in the perimeter security fence market, driven by massive infrastructure investments and rapid urbanization in countries like China, India, and Southeast Asian nations. North America and Europe continue to be mature markets with strong demand from the commercial, industrial, and government sectors, while the Middle East & Africa region is witnessing increased adoption due to infrastructure development and heightened security needs. Latin America, although a smaller market, is experiencing steady growth as governments and private organizations prioritize security in response to rising crime rates. Collectively, these regional dynamics are contributing to a vibrant and competitive global market landscape.





    Product Type Analysis




    The p

  11. Plastic Fencing Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Dec 3, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2024). Plastic Fencing Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/plastic-fencing-market
    Explore at:
    csv, pdf, pptxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 3, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Plastic Fencing Market Outlook



    The global plastic fencing market size is expected to undergo significant growth, reaching approximately USD 7.6 billion by 2032, up from USD 4.3 billion in 2023, at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.5% during the forecast period. This growth trajectory is driven by the increasing demand for durable, low-maintenance fencing solutions across various applications including residential, commercial, agricultural, and industrial sectors. The shift towards sustainable and cost-effective fencing options is further bolstered by the rising awareness regarding the environmental impact of traditional fencing materials, thus acting as a catalyst for the adoption of plastic fencing. With innovations in material science, the quality, aesthetic appeal, and resilience of plastic fences have improved, making them an attractive alternative to wood and metal fences.



    The evolution of lifestyle preferences, particularly in urban and suburban areas, has been a significant growth factor for the plastic fencing market. As more homeowners seek to enhance the security and aesthetic appeal of their properties, the demand for versatile fencing solutions has increased. Plastic fences offer a diverse range of styles and colors, allowing for customization that meets individual preferences and architectural designs. Furthermore, the longevity of plastic as a fencing material, which requires minimal maintenance compared to traditional materials, makes it a cost-effective choice for long-term usage. This durability is particularly appealing in regions prone to harsh weather conditions, where traditional materials may deteriorate quickly.



    Another major growth factor is the increasing agricultural and industrial applications of plastic fencing. In agriculture, plastic fences are used to demarcate boundaries and protect crops from wildlife, thus enhancing productivity and reducing losses. The lightweight and flexible nature of plastic materials allows for easy installation and movement, catering to the dynamic needs of agricultural settings. In industrial applications, plastic fencing provides an effective way to establish perimeters and enhance security without significant investment, making it an attractive option for both large and small scale operations. The ease of installation and removal further supports its use in temporary setups such as construction sites and industrial projects.



    The commercial sector is also contributing to the market's growth, with businesses increasingly opting for plastic fencing to enhance the aesthetic appeal and security of their premises. Retail and hospitality industries, in particular, require attractive yet functional fencing solutions to create inviting environments for customers. Plastic fencing meets these requirements while also offering the advantage of being recyclable, aligning with the growing emphasis on sustainability and corporate responsibility. Additionally, technological advancements in plastic manufacturing have led to the development of fences that mimic the look of traditional materials, thus appealing to businesses looking for aesthetic continuity without the associated upkeep costs.



    Regionally, North America holds a substantial share of the plastic fencing market, driven by strong consumer awareness and regulatory support for sustainable building materials. The region's market is expected to grow steadily, with a robust infrastructure sector and a high rate of home renovation projects. Meanwhile, the Asia Pacific region is anticipated to experience the fastest growth, with a burgeoning construction industry and increasing urbanization. Rising disposable incomes and changing consumer preferences towards improved safety and aesthetic appeal in residential spaces are also contributing factors. Europe is witnessing moderate growth driven by regulatory frameworks promoting environmental sustainability and the use of recyclable materials, while the Middle East & Africa show potential growth opportunities due to expanding infrastructural developments.



    Product Type Analysis



    In the plastic fencing market, product types such as picket fencing, post & rail fencing, privacy fencing, and others play a pivotal role. Picket fencing, known for its decorative appeal, is highly popular in residential applications. It combines aesthetics with functionality, offering a visually appealing boundary solution that enhances curb appeal while ensuring security. This type of fencing is favored in suburban areas where aesthetics are a top priority for homeowners. The versatility in design and color options allows homeowners to complement their houses perfec

  12. r

    Kuranda Crescent Boundaries

    • researchdata.edu.au
    Updated May 28, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.nsw.gov.au (2025). Kuranda Crescent Boundaries [Dataset]. https://researchdata.edu.au/kuranda-crescent-boundaries/3575121
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 28, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    data.nsw.gov.au
    Area covered
    Kuranda Crescent
    Description

    Metadata

    Content Title

    Kuranda Crescent Boundaries

    Content Type

    Web Map

    Description

    Demonstrate boundaries around Kuranda Cres, Kotara South

    Initial Publication Date

    27/08/2022

    Data Currency

    27/08/2022

    Data Update Frequency

    Other

    Content Source

    Not recorded

    File Type

    Map Feature Service

    Attribution

    .

    Data Theme, Classification or Relationship to other Datasets

    .

    Accuracy

    ~2 metre

    Spatial Reference System (dataset)

    GDA2020

    Spatial Reference System (web service)

    EPSG:3857

    WGS84 Equivalent To

    GDA2020

    Spatial Extent

    Content Lineage

    Data Classification

    Unclassified

    Data Access Policy

    Open

    Data Quality

    .

    Terms and Conditions

    Creative Commons

    Standard and Specification

    .

    Data Custodian

    NSW Spatial Services

    Point of Contact

    Please contact us via the Spatial Services Customer Hub

    <p

  13. N

    Fence, Wisconsin Population Pyramid Dataset: Age Groups, Male and Female...

    • neilsberg.com
    csv, json
    Updated Feb 22, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Neilsberg Research (2025). Fence, Wisconsin Population Pyramid Dataset: Age Groups, Male and Female Population, and Total Population for Demographics Analysis // 2025 Edition [Dataset]. https://www.neilsberg.com/research/datasets/524bd75d-f122-11ef-8c1b-3860777c1fe6/
    Explore at:
    json, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 22, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Neilsberg Research
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Wisconsin, Fence
    Variables measured
    Male and Female Population Under 5 Years, Male and Female Population over 85 years, Male and Female Total Population for Age Groups, Male and Female Population Between 5 and 9 years, Male and Female Population Between 10 and 14 years, Male and Female Population Between 15 and 19 years, Male and Female Population Between 20 and 24 years, Male and Female Population Between 25 and 29 years, Male and Female Population Between 30 and 34 years, Male and Female Population Between 35 and 39 years, and 9 more
    Measurement technique
    The data presented in this dataset is derived from the latest U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. To measure the three variables, namely (a) male population, (b) female population and (b) total population, we initially analyzed and categorized the data for each of the age groups. For age groups we divided it into roughly a 5 year bucket for ages between 0 and 85. For over 85, we aggregated data into a single group for all ages. For further information regarding these estimates, please feel free to reach out to us via email at research@neilsberg.com.
    Dataset funded by
    Neilsberg Research
    Description
    About this dataset

    Context

    The dataset tabulates the data for the Fence, Wisconsin population pyramid, which represents the Fence town population distribution across age and gender, using estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. It lists the male and female population for each age group, along with the total population for those age groups. Higher numbers at the bottom of the table suggest population growth, whereas higher numbers at the top indicate declining birth rates. Furthermore, the dataset can be utilized to understand the youth dependency ratio, old-age dependency ratio, total dependency ratio, and potential support ratio.

    Key observations

    • Youth dependency ratio, which is the number of children aged 0-14 per 100 persons aged 15-64, for Fence, Wisconsin, is 18.8.
    • Old-age dependency ratio, which is the number of persons aged 65 or over per 100 persons aged 15-64, for Fence, Wisconsin, is 66.4.
    • Total dependency ratio for Fence, Wisconsin is 85.2.
    • Potential support ratio, which is the number of youth (working age population) per elderly, for Fence, Wisconsin is 1.5.
    Content

    When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

    Age groups:

    • Under 5 years
    • 5 to 9 years
    • 10 to 14 years
    • 15 to 19 years
    • 20 to 24 years
    • 25 to 29 years
    • 30 to 34 years
    • 35 to 39 years
    • 40 to 44 years
    • 45 to 49 years
    • 50 to 54 years
    • 55 to 59 years
    • 60 to 64 years
    • 65 to 69 years
    • 70 to 74 years
    • 75 to 79 years
    • 80 to 84 years
    • 85 years and over

    Variables / Data Columns

    • Age Group: This column displays the age group for the Fence town population analysis. Total expected values are 18 and are define above in the age groups section.
    • Population (Male): The male population in the Fence town for the selected age group is shown in the following column.
    • Population (Female): The female population in the Fence town for the selected age group is shown in the following column.
    • Total Population: The total population of the Fence town for the selected age group is shown in the following column.

    Good to know

    Margin of Error

    Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

    Custom data

    If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

    Inspiration

    Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

    Recommended for further research

    This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Fence town Population by Age. You can refer the same here

  14. Data from: Complex interactions of deer herbivory, soil chemistry, and...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • datadryad.org
    zip
    Updated Sep 25, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Danielle Begley-Miller (2024). Complex interactions of deer herbivory, soil chemistry, and competing vegetation explain oak-hickory forest tree regeneration in central Pennsylvania, USA [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.z8w9ghxnk
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 25, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Pennsylvania State University
    Authors
    Danielle Begley-Miller
    License

    https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html

    Area covered
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Description

    The root causes of forest tree regeneration failure are difficult to resolve, although numerous studies show ungulate herbivory, soil conditions, and competition from undesirable vegetation as likely contributors. To better understand the relative importance of each issue, we conducted a 7-year manipulative experiment to assess the interactive effects of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) herbivory, soil acidity, and competing vegetation on tree regeneration in oak-hickory forests of central Pennsylvania, USA. Outcomes depended on initial tree seedling abundance, and all three factors had significant interactions. At low initial seedling abundance, fencing resulted in the greatest increase, but all treatments had a positive effect on seedling growth and abundance. At higher initial seedling abundance, abundance failed to recover 7 years after herbicide treatment and soil pH was an important predictor. When soil pH was > 4.6 from lime application, seedling growth and abundance in unfenced controls with high initial abundance was comparable to the fenced-only treatment. Competing vegetation, assumed to be a symptom of excessive, long-term deer herbivory, does not seem to be the primary factor limiting tree regeneration in our study area. Ameliorating acid deposition warrants greater consideration as a management action because it could provide long-lasting benefits compared to short-term fence installations. Methods 2.1 Study area The study area was located on portions of the Rothrock and Bald Eagle state forests in central Pennsylvania in the Ridge and Valley Physiographic Province. The study area was primarily a contiguous forest dominated by hardwood stands of red oak (Quercus rubra), chestnut oak (Q. montana), black oak (Q. velutina), and scarlet oak (Q. coccinea) at higher elevations and red oak and yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) at lower elevations. Red maple (Acer rubrum) was common in the understory and black birch (Betula nigra) was oftentimes an abundant species in early successional stands. The mean tree basal area across the study area from 2014-2021 was 22.40 m2/ha (SD = 11.97, n = 261). The most common plant community was the oak-heath association (Zimmerman et al., 2012) with an oak overstory, and an understory dominated by mountain laurel, huckleberry (Gaylussacia spp.), and blueberry (Vaccinium spp.), especially at higher elevations on dry soils. At the time of full plot establishment in 2014, at least one of these three taxa was present at 85% of plots (n = 261); mountain laurel was present at 73% of plots, blueberry species at 71% of plots, and huckleberry species at 58% of plots. Furthermore, mountain laurel volume was highly correlated with the summed volume of all three taxa combined (R2 = 0.72). In 2018–2019, deer density was greater in Rothrock State Forest (7.9–9.2 deer/km2) than in Bald Eagle State Forest (2.8–3.3 deer/km2). Sampling sites were 400–700 m above sea level and all plots within a site were no more than 36.6m from the next nearest plot, laid out in a network bounded by a 110m by 52m perimeter (Fig. 2). Study area soils are derived from a number of sandstone, siltstone, and shale and include Typic Hapludults, Typic Fragiudults, Aquic Fragiudults, and Typic Dystrudepts. This study did not require ethical approval and permits to conduct fieldwork were obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR). 2.2 Experimental design From 100 potential sampling locations established across the two state forests, we randomly selected 24 vegetation sampling sites. One of these sites occurred within a deer exclosure previously erected by managers, but evidence of deer presence (pellets) and herbivory was noted during our site visit in 2015. At each of the 24 sampling sites, we established 11 circular 14.62-m diameter plots (plots 1–5 in 2013 and plots 6-11 in 2014). At the same time, we nested a single circular 3.30-m diameter microplot 3.66 m due east of each plot center. Microplots were numbered the same as the plot in which they were nested. We assigned one of seven treatment combinations to microplots 5–11 at each location. The treatments were fence (always at microplot 5), and then herbicide, lime, combinations of fence + herbicide, fence + lime, lime + herbicide, and a three-way combination of fence + lime + herbicide were randomly assigned to microplots 6-11. Plots 1–4 served as controls throughout the study and their microplots did not have any treatment applied. We installed fencing and applied liming treatments in the summer of 2014 (27 May–14 Aug) immediately following a full vegetation inventory (described below). Fences were constructed of a 1.8-m tall polyvinyl deer fence attached to posts and overstory trees encompassing the entire microplot plus a minimum 0.75 m buffer. We maintained fences yearly at the time of data collection, except in 2020. We applied to each microplot pelletized dolomitic limestone (CaMg(CO2)3) (consistent with other studies) at a rate of 5 Mg ha-1 (or 6.7 kg per microplot). We conducted herbicide treatments following the 2015 summer vegetation monitoring season over an 11-day period from 17–28 Aug 2015. We applied 1.9 L of a non-targeted herbicide, broadcast oil-water emulsification tank mix of 1.5% v/v ester triclopyr and 3.0% v/v amine glyphosate combined with a 1.5% v/v emulsifier and 0.05% v/v non-ionic surfactant. All vegetation was treated within the microplot due to the non-selective nature of the herbicide, promoting the competitive release of newly emerging vegetation following application. 2.3 Vegetation and Soil Monitoring We sampled vegetation at each microplot across all 24 sites before treatment application in 2014 and 2015 and after treatment application in 2016, 2018, and 2021. We considered any live, arborescent, woody species that was ≤2.54 cm diameter at breast height (DBH) a tree seedling and counted individuals of each species by height class (class categories are: 1 = < 0.15 m, 2 = 0.15 – 0.3 m, 3 = 0.3 – 0.9 m, 4 = 0.9 – 1.5 m, 5 = > 1.5 m). DBH was measured 1.37m from the ground. For each taxon not considered a tree species, we recorded a cover in 10% increments, ranging from 0-10% (class 0) to 90-100% (class 9) by the same height class categories used for seedlings. We converted each cover class estimate to its midpoint. Because taxa can overlap at different heights, the amount of cover in each microplot could exceed 100%. We estimated the volume (m3) of mountain laurel by multiplying the midpoint of the total estimated horizontal cover in each microplot by the upper bound of the height class category. For analysis, we used the mean volume of mountain laurel across survey years after herbicide treatment (2016-2021). We calculated basal area as the total cross-sectional area (m2) of measured tree boles >12.7 cm DBH within the plot area (168 m2) and converted values to m2 per ha. Mean BA (m2 ha-1) across all survey years (2014-2021) was used as a covariate for analysis. For canopy openness, we used the logit-transformed proportion of open sky at 1 m above ground level assessed for each microplot with fisheye lens photos and Gap Light Analyzer. We collected soil samples by hand from a 0.6 m diameter soil pit to a depth of 40 cm at microplots 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 at each sampling site in both 2014 and 2016 and at microplots 2–4 when time allowed. We pooled the Oa and A horizons together for analysis because the A horizon was thin and indistinguishable from the Oa horizon. We dried each sample on kraft paper at ~23 °C, ground it using mortar and pestle, and sieved it to 2 mm to remove coarse debris. We measured pH using 0.01 M CaCl2 with a 1:5 soil-to-solution ratio (Ag Analytical Services Laboratory in University Park, PA). 2.4 Statistical analysis Our experiment with treatments of herbicide, lime, and fencing was identified and executed a priori to any statistical analysis. The statistical analysis was not exploratory but tested the three treatments and interactions. We conducted our analyses using two different response variables because the seedling response to treatments could occur via mortality, recruitment, and growth. Counts of seedlings (Count) only assess abundance via mortality and recruitment, while aggregate height (AggHt) is an index that incorporates both seedling abundance and growth. Aggregate height was calculated as the number of seedlings in each height class multiplied by the midpoint of the height class in meters; for the tallest height class (> 1.5m), we set 1.8 m as the midpoint. The response variables, based on Count and AggHt, were calculated as the change between 2014 and 2021, where a positive change indicated an increase over time. We used a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) where the treatments of fencing (FENCE), herbicide (HERB), and lime (LIME) were binary fixed effects. We included Count or AggHt in 2014 (COUNT14 or AggHt14) as a covariate in all models because declines in the response variable could not be greater than what existed on the microplot in 2014. Site was included as a random intercept effect to account for potential similarities among microplots within a sampling site and each observation at the microplot was treated as a random effect to account for overdispersion. We fit models that included all main effects and interactions, all main effects and 2- and 3-way interactions, all main effects and 2-way interactions, and only main effects. We used Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) to identify the best model, which among the suite of models developed identifies the model that minimizes the number of parameters and maximizes the amount of variation explained by the model, rather than a hypothesis testing approach based on P-values (or confidence intervals) and likelihood-ratio tests. We ranked the top models by AIC to show how well models explained patterns in our data, and in the

  15. Childrens Fencing Clothes Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Oct 16, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2024). Childrens Fencing Clothes Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/childrens-fencing-clothes-market
    Explore at:
    pptx, pdf, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 16, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Children's Fencing Clothes Market Outlook



    The global market size of children's fencing clothes was valued at approximately USD 300 million in 2023, and it is expected to grow to around USD 600 million by 2032, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.8%. The growth of this market is driven by increasing awareness about fencing as a sport and its inclusion in school curriculums, which is boosting the demand for specialized clothing for young fencers.



    Several factors contribute to the robust growth of the children's fencing clothes market. Firstly, the rising popularity of fencing as a competitive sport for children and as a part of physical education programs in schools has led to a significant increase in demand for appropriate clothing and gear. Parents and guardians are keen on providing the best equipment to ensure safety and performance, which includes top-quality fencing clothes. Additionally, growing media exposure and coverage of international fencing competitions have inspired many young enthusiasts, further propelling market growth.



    Secondly, technological advancements in textile manufacturing have resulted in the development of more durable, flexible, and comfortable materials for fencing clothes. These innovations enhance the performance and safety features of the apparel, making them more attractive to consumers. The integration of moisture-wicking materials, enhanced breathability, and lightweight yet sturdy fabrics are some of the key improvements that have contributed to the increasing demand. Moreover, the development of eco-friendly and sustainable materials is attracting environmentally conscious consumers.



    Another significant growth driver is the increasing disposable income of families, particularly in emerging economies. With more financial resources at hand, parents are increasingly willing to invest in high-quality sports gear for their children, including fencing clothes. This trend is particularly evident in urban areas where there is a greater emphasis on extracurricular activities and sports. Additionally, government initiatives to promote sports at the grassroots level are providing further impetus to the market.



    Regionally, North America and Europe are the primary markets for children's fencing clothes, owing to the long-standing tradition and popularity of the sport. However, Asia Pacific is emerging as a lucrative market due to the growing interest in fencing and the rapid development of sports infrastructure in countries like China, Japan, and India. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also showing promising growth potential, although these markets are still in the nascent stages.



    Product Type Analysis



    In the children's fencing clothes market, the product type segment is diverse, encompassing jackets, breeches, plastrons, gloves, masks, shoes, and others. Jackets are a crucial component of fencing attire, providing protection and flexibility. They are typically made from robust yet breathable materials to ensure comfort and safety. The demand for fencing jackets is driven by their essential role in ensuring the safety of young fencers. Innovations in materials and design have resulted in jackets that offer better fit and protection without compromising on mobility, thus gaining favor among consumers.



    Breeches are another vital part of the fencing uniform, designed to protect the lower body. They are usually padded and made from materials that resist wear and tear. The growing emphasis on safety in children's sports is a key factor driving the demand for high-quality breeches. Additionally, the trend towards customized and personalized sportswear is gaining traction, with manufacturers offering breeches in various sizes and designs to cater to individual preferences.



    Plastrons, which provide additional protection for the upper body, are increasingly being integrated into fencing outfits. These garments are particularly important for ensuring the safety of young fencers during practice and competition. The market for plastrons is expanding as parents and coaches prioritize comprehensive protective gear. Innovations in materials that combine flexibility with high impact resistance are enhancing the appeal of plastrons.



    Gloves and masks are essential for safeguarding the hands and face of young fencers. The demand for these products is driven by the need to prevent injuries and ensure a safe fencing experience. Manufacturers are focusing on designing gloves and masks that are not only protective bu

  16. i

    Iron or steel wire; grill, netting and fencing, coated with materials other...

    • app.indexbox.io
    Updated Dec 17, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    IndexBox AI Platform (2021). Iron or steel wire; grill, netting and fencing, coated with materials other than zinc or plastic: Most Promising Supplying Countries 2007-2018 [Dataset]. https://app.indexbox.io/report/731449/174/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 17, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    IndexBox AI Platform
    License

    Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 (CC BY-ND 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    2007 - 2018
    Area covered
    Comoros
    Description

    Most Promising Supplying Countries 2007-2018: Top Countries To Source Your Product, Top Exporting Countries, Low-cost Exporting Countries

  17. i

    Iron or steel wire; grill, netting and fencing, welded at the intersection,...

    • app.indexbox.io
    Updated Dec 27, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    IndexBox AI Platform (2021). Iron or steel wire; grill, netting and fencing, welded at the intersection, n.e.s. in item no. 7314.20, (other than plated or coated with zinc): Most Promising Supplying Countries 2007-2018 [Dataset]. https://app.indexbox.io/report/731439/336/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 27, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    IndexBox AI Platform
    License

    Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 (CC BY-ND 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    2007 - 2018
    Area covered
    Holy See
    Description

    Most Promising Supplying Countries 2007-2018: Top Countries To Source Your Product, Top Exporting Countries, Low-cost Exporting Countries

  18. Fencing Uniforms Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Sep 22, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2024). Fencing Uniforms Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/global-fencing-uniforms-market
    Explore at:
    csv, pptx, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 22, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Fencing Uniforms Market Outlook



    The global fencing uniforms market size was valued at approximately USD 166.5 million in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 279.1 million by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.9% during the forecast period. The growth of this market is primarily driven by rising participation in fencing sports worldwide, increasing awareness about the importance of protective gear, and technological advancements in fabric materials used for fencing uniforms.



    The increasing popularity of fencing as a competitive sport at both amateur and professional levels has significantly boosted the demand for high-quality fencing uniforms. Factors such as the inclusion of fencing in the Olympic Games and other international competitions have played a pivotal role in promoting the sport. Additionally, growing investments in sports infrastructure and training facilities have further encouraged participation, thereby fueling the demand for appropriate fencing attire. Another crucial growth factor is the heightened awareness regarding safety and injury prevention among fencers, which emphasizes the necessity for reliable and durable uniforms.



    Technological advancements in fabric materials have led to the development of fencing uniforms that offer enhanced durability, flexibility, and comfort. Innovations in materials such as lightweight, breathable fabrics that provide superior protection without compromising on mobility are attracting significant consumer interest. Manufacturers are increasingly focusing on research and development to create uniforms that meet stringent safety standards while also ensuring the comfort and performance of athletes. This focus on innovation is anticipated to play a crucial role in the market's growth over the forecast period.



    Another important factor contributing to the market's expansion is the growing trend of customization and personalization in sports apparel. Fencers, like athletes in other sports, are increasingly seeking uniforms that reflect their individual style and preferences. This trend is driving demand for customized fencing uniforms that cater to specific requirements in terms of fit, design, and material. Additionally, the rise of online retail platforms has made it easier for consumers to access a wide range of fencing uniforms, further propelling market growth.



    On a regional level, North America and Europe are expected to hold significant shares of the global fencing uniforms market. These regions have a well-established culture of fencing, with numerous clubs, tournaments, and training facilities. Moreover, the presence of key manufacturers and suppliers in these regions contributes to the market's growth. Asia Pacific is also anticipated to witness substantial growth due to increasing participation in fencing sports and rising disposable income, which enables consumers to invest in high-quality sports gear.



    Product Type Analysis



    The fencing uniforms market is segmented into various product types, including jackets, breeches, plastrons, gloves, masks, and others. Jackets are among the most critical components of a fencer's uniform, providing essential protection to the torso. These jackets are designed to withstand the impact of fencing weapons and are typically made from durable materials like cotton or synthetic fibers. The continuous innovation in jacket design, focusing on improving breathability and comfort, is expected to drive demand in this segment.



    Breeches, which protect the lower body, are another vital part of the fencing uniform. They are usually paired with long socks and designed to offer maximum flexibility and protection. The breeches segment is likely to experience steady growth due to the increasing emphasis on comprehensive protection for fencers. Manufacturers are focusing on creating lightweight, durable breeches that do not restrict movement, thereby enhancing the overall performance of athletes.



    Plastrons, which offer additional protection for the upper body, particularly on the weapon arm and torso, are becoming increasingly popular. These protective garments are often used by fencers at higher levels of competition who require extra safety measures. The demand for plastrons is expected to grow as more fencers seek to minimize the risk of injury during training and competition.



    Gloves and masks are indispensable components of a fencer's uniform, providing crucial protection for the hands and face. Gloves are designed to offer a secure grip on the weapon

  19. Metal Fence Gates Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Jan 7, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2025). Metal Fence Gates Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/metal-fence-gates-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, csv, pptxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 7, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Metal Fence Gates Market Outlook



    The global metal fence gates market size was valued at approximately USD 15.2 billion in 2023 and is anticipated to reach USD 25.3 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.8% during the forecast period. The burgeoning demand for enhanced security and aesthetic appeal in residential, commercial, and industrial properties is a significant driving factor behind this growth trajectory.



    The increasing urbanization and industrialization across various regions are primary growth factors for the metal fence gates market. As urban areas expand and more people move into cities, the demand for secure residential properties rises. Metal fence gates provide both security and aesthetic appeal, making them a preferred choice among homeowners and property developers. Additionally, the rise in disposable income allows more people to invest in the enhancement and protection of their properties, further fueling market growth.



    Technological advancements in manufacturing processes and materials used in metal fence gates are also contributing to market expansion. Innovations such as automated gates, smart lock systems, and corrosion-resistant materials have made metal fence gates more durable and user-friendly. These advancements not only improve the lifespan and functionality of the gates but also appeal to tech-savvy consumers looking for modern solutions to property security and aesthetics.



    Environmental sustainability trends are increasingly influencing the metal fence gates market. With growing awareness of environmental issues, manufacturers are focusing on producing eco-friendly gates made from recyclable materials. This shift towards sustainable production practices is not only reducing the environmental impact but also attracting environmentally conscious consumers. Moreover, regulatory frameworks aimed at promoting sustainable construction practices are further propelling market growth.



    In the realm of residential safety, Hardware-Mounted Baby Gates have emerged as a critical component for ensuring child safety. These gates are specifically designed to be securely attached to walls or door frames, providing a robust barrier that prevents young children from accessing potentially hazardous areas. Unlike pressure-mounted gates, hardware-mounted options offer enhanced stability and are ideal for use at the top of stairs or in high-traffic areas. Their durability and reliability make them a preferred choice for parents seeking peace of mind, knowing that their children are protected from accidents and falls. As more families prioritize child safety, the demand for high-quality, secure baby gates continues to rise, influencing the broader market for safety and security products.



    Regionally, North America is expected to hold a significant market share due to the high demand for residential and commercial property security solutions. The Asia Pacific region is anticipated to witness the fastest growth during the forecast period, driven by rapid urbanization and infrastructure development in countries like China and India. Europe is also a crucial market, with substantial demand from both residential and industrial sectors for secure and aesthetically pleasing fencing solutions.



    Product Type Analysis



    Swing gates are one of the most commonly used metal fence gates, particularly in residential areas. Their simplicity and ease of installation make them a popular choice among homeowners. Swing gates can be either single or double-leafed, and they offer a classic look that suits various property types. Additionally, the availability of automated swing gates has increased their appeal, allowing homeowners to enhance security without compromising convenience. Swing gates are also relatively low-cost, making them an attractive option for budget-conscious consumers.



    Sliding gates are gaining traction, especially in commercial and industrial applications where space is a constraint. These gates are ideal for properties with limited driveway space as they slide horizontally along the fence line, eliminating the need for a large swing arc. Sliding gates are often equipped with automation and advanced locking mechanisms, providing enhanced security and ease of use. Their robust construction and space-saving attributes make them highly suitable for high-traffic areas and properties requiring stringent security measures.



    Bi-fold

  20. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Simon A. Buzzard; Andrew F. Jakes; Amy J. Pearson; Len Broberg (2023). DataSheet_1_Advancing fence datasets: Comparing approaches to map fence locations and specifications in southwest Montana.pdf [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2022.958729.s001

DataSheet_1_Advancing fence datasets: Comparing approaches to map fence locations and specifications in southwest Montana.pdf

Related Article
Explore at:
pdfAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jun 1, 2023
Dataset provided by
Frontiers
Authors
Simon A. Buzzard; Andrew F. Jakes; Amy J. Pearson; Len Broberg
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Area covered
Montana
Description

Fencing is a major anthropogenic feature affecting wildlife distributions and movements, but its impacts are difficult to quantify due to a widespread lack of spatial data. We created a fence model and compared outputs to a fence mapping approach using satellite imagery in two counties in southwest Montana, USA to advance fence data development for use in research and management. The model incorporated road, land cover, ownership, and grazing boundary spatial layers to predict fence locations. We validated the model using data collected on randomized road transects (n = 330). The model predicted ~34,700 km of fences with a mean fence density of 0.93 km/km2 and a maximum density of 14.9 km/km2. We also digitized fences using Google Earth Pro in a random subset of our study area in survey townships (n = 50). The Google Earth approach showed greater agreement (K = 0.76) with known samples than the fence model (K = 0.56) yet was unable to map fences in forests and was significantly more time intensive. We also compared fence attributes by land ownership and land cover variables to assess factors that may influence fence specifications (e.g., wire heights) and types (e.g., number of barbed wires). Private land fences had bottom wires that were closer to the ground and top wires higher from the ground when compared to fences on public lands, with sample means at ~22 cm and ~26 cm, and ~115 cm and ~111 cm, respectively. Both bottom wire means were well below recommended heights for ungulates navigating underneath fencing (≥ 46 cm), while top wire means were closer to the 107 cm maximum fence height recommendation. We found that both fence type and land ownership were correlated (χ2 = 45.52, df = 5, p = 0.001) as well as fence type and land cover type (χ2 = 140.73, df = 15, p = 0.001). We provide tools for estimating fence locations, and our novel fence type assessment demonstrates an opportunity for updated policy to encourage the adoption of “wildlife-friendlier” fencing standards to facilitate wildlife movement in the western U.S. while supporting rural livelihoods.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu