Explore the Urea Phosphate Manufacturing Plant Project Report 2025 by Procurement Resource. Stay updated on Urea Phosphate manufacturing cost analysis, procurement insights, ROI, and market evaluation.

The global agricultural urea phosphate market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for high-yield crops and the rising global population. The market, currently valued at approximately $15 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 6% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated market value of $25 billion by 2033. This growth is primarily fueled by several key factors. The expanding application of urea phosphate as a feed additive, fertilizer, and preservative in agriculture is a significant contributor. Furthermore, advancements in production methods, such as the thermal phosphoric acid method and the wet process phosphoric acid method, are enhancing efficiency and reducing production costs, thereby making urea phosphate a more cost-effective option for farmers. The increasing adoption of sustainable agricultural practices also plays a vital role, with urea phosphate offering a balanced nutrient profile beneficial for soil health. While factors such as fluctuating raw material prices and stringent environmental regulations pose some challenges, the overall market outlook remains positive, particularly in regions with intensive agricultural activity like Asia Pacific and North America. The market is segmented by application (feed additives, fertilizers, preservatives) and production type (thermal phosphoric acid method, wet process phosphoric acid method). Major players such as Haifa, SQM, ISHITA, Evergrow, Shifang Tianrui Chemical, Zuari Agro, and Guizhou Zerophos Chemical are actively shaping the market landscape through innovation and expansion. Regional analysis reveals significant market opportunities in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific, driven by diverse factors such as government support for agricultural development and rising disposable incomes leading to increased food consumption. The forecast period of 2025-2033 presents substantial prospects for market expansion, owing to the increasing adoption of improved farming techniques and the continuous development of more efficient and sustainable agricultural inputs. This report provides a detailed analysis of the global agricultural urea phosphate market, offering insights into production, consumption, pricing, and key players. We project a market valued at $25 billion in 2024, growing at a CAGR of 5% to reach $35 billion by 2029. This report is crucial for businesses involved in fertilizer production, agricultural technology, and investment strategies within the agrochemical sector.

Agricultural Urea Phosphate Market Outlook

The global agricultural urea phosphate market size in 2023 is estimated to be around USD 1.2 billion and is projected to reach approximately USD 2.3 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.5%. The growth of this market is driven by factors such as increasing agricultural productivity demands, the need for efficient fertilizers with high nutrient content, and the shift towards sustainable farming practices.

One of the primary growth factors for the agricultural urea phosphate market is the rising global population, which necessitates increased food production. As arable land is limited, there is a growing need for fertilizers that enhance crop yield and improve soil fertility. Urea phosphate, known for its high nitrogen and phosphorus content, is increasingly being adopted by farmers to meet these demands. Additionally, the increasing focus on high-value crops like fruits and vegetables, which require efficient nutrient management, further fuels the market growth.

Another significant factor propelling the market is the trend towards sustainable and precision farming. Farmers are increasingly adopting practices that minimize environmental impact while maximizing agricultural output. Urea phosphate, with its efficient nutrient delivery and reduced environmental footprint, aligns well with these sustainable farming practices. Moreover, innovations in fertilizer application technologies, such as fertigation and foliar feeding, are expanding the use of urea phosphate in modern agriculture.

The growing awareness about soil health and the need for balanced fertilization is also boosting the demand for urea phosphate. Unlike traditional fertilizers, urea phosphate provides a balanced supply of nitrogen and phosphorus, essential for plant growth. It helps in maintaining soil pH levels and improves nutrient uptake efficiency, thereby contributing to healthier crops and higher yields. This understanding is driving farmers and agricultural professionals to increasingly prefer urea phosphate over other fertilizers.

Agriculture Urea plays a crucial role in enhancing the efficiency of urea phosphate fertilizers. As a key component, it provides a rich source of nitrogen, which is essential for plant growth and development. The integration of Agriculture Urea in urea phosphate formulations not only boosts nutrient content but also improves the solubility and uptake of phosphorus by plants. This synergy between nitrogen and phosphorus is vital for achieving optimal crop yields, especially in high-demand agricultural sectors. As farmers strive to meet the increasing food production needs, the role of Agriculture Urea in sustainable and efficient fertilization practices becomes even more significant.

Regionally, the agricultural urea phosphate market is witnessing substantial growth across various geographies, with Asia Pacific leading the way. The region's dominance is attributed to its vast agricultural base, growing population, and increasing adoption of advanced farming techniques. North America and Europe are also significant markets, driven by technological advancements in agriculture and the growing emphasis on sustainable farming practices. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa regions are expected to experience moderate growth due to improving agricultural infrastructure and increasing awareness about efficient fertilizers.

Product Type Analysis

The agricultural urea phosphate market can be segmented based on product type into solid and liquid formulations. Solid urea phosphate is widely used due to its ease of handling, storage, and application. It is commonly applied as a soil amendment or through direct soil incorporation, making it suitable for a variety of crops and soil types. Solid urea phosphate is particularly favored in regions with extensive agricultural activities, as it offers a cost-effective solution for large-scale farming operations.

Liquid urea phosphate, on the other hand, is gaining popularity due to its efficiency in precision agriculture and fertigation systems. Liquid formulations offer the advantage of uniform nutrient distribution and are easily absorbed by plants, leading to improved crop yield and quality. The ease of application through irrigation systems makes liquid urea phosphate a preferred choice for high-value crops such as fruits and vegetables. The growing adoption of modern farming techniques

Fertilizer prices continue to ramp up due to a shortage in supply caused by lower output in EU countries. High natural gas costs shape that growth because gas accounts for up to 80% of variable costs in nitrogen fertilizer production. Urea prices spiked exceptionally high to $900 per ton in November 2021, gaining 30% against the previous month. Phosphate rock price rose by 4%, while diammonium phosphate and triple superphosphate were both up by 8%. Next year, fertilizer prices are projected to climb further due to a continued shortage in supply, but if costs for natural gas maintain their downward trend, they will hold the price increases back.

The fertilizer and compost manufacturing industry has experienced significant growth in the current period due primarily to changes in input prices, crop production and fertilizer pricing. In recent years, high fertilizer prices, driven by robust demand and input costs, have notably improved industry revenue and profit. Consistent increases in crop yields and production, particularly in core commodities like corn, wheat and soybeans, have bolstered fertilizer demand over the current period despite recent downward pressure from declining crop prices and farmer incomes. Even as the agricultural sector begins to deflate after extreme pricing highs in 2022, revenues for fertilizer manufacturers remain elevated and have grown at a CAGR of 6.3% over the current period to reach $35.4 billion after declining by 0.1% in 2025. Global markets have presented a complex landscape for US fertilizer manufacturers. As domestic producers step in to fill supply gaps created by global shortages and disruptions — such as those stemming from the Ukraine-Russia conflict — they have expanded their international market presence, bolstering the industry's global competitiveness and supporting profit growth, which has helped offset domestic market volatility. Strong demand for organic and specialty fertilizers has helped to propel this growth as manufacturers capitalize on shifting global preferences. However, ongoing supply chain disruptions and rising input costs, including the effects of tariffs on essential raw materials and finished fertilizer products, have placed some stress on operational stability and motivated a move toward expanded domestic production. While these higher costs have largely been passed on to consumers, bolstering revenue in the current period, they have also led to elevated expenses throughout the supply chain and diminished the price competitiveness of US-made fertilizers globally as costs rise. Looking ahead, the industry is poised for continued growth. Conflicts impacting global production hubs and trade conflicts are promoting increased investment in localized production capabilities. With governments and consumers increasingly prioritizing sustainability, demand for eco-friendly fertilizers will continue to surge. As climate change creates more uncertainty for farmers, shifting growing seasons and making harvests less predictable, it also means there will be a growing need for more advanced fertilizer solutions and application methods. Not only will producers need to lean on new, innovative products to maintain soil health and help crops cope with weather extremes, but they will also often have to use more fertilizer just to keep yields up. These conditions are pushing manufacturers to invest in research and development for long-term competitiveness. Precision fertilization also represents an evolving opportunity for producers to foster efficient, sustainable agricultural practices and open new market avenues. As the industry adapts to these trends, manufacturers' embrace of innovation and sustainability will be critical in meeting future demands and capturing emerging opportunities. Overall, industry revenue is projected to grow at a CAGR of 0.4% to reach $37.0 billion by 2030.

This dataset includes price spreads (Cornbelt price minus New Orleans, LA price) measured in dollars per ton. New Orleans is a key fertilizer-pricing hub, and the Cornbelt is a large user of fertilizer due to the region's substantial row crop production. The price spread (Cornbelt minus New Orleans) can reflect transportation costs and other local supply and demand factors.

Fertilizer commodities include urea, urea ammonium nitrate (UAN), monoammonium phosphate (MAP), diammonium phosphate (DAP), and potash. UAN prices assume a 32 percent nitrogen content. Cornbelt states include Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, and Nebraska.

The monthly average prices are derived from weekly reports with permission from Green Markets, a Bloomberg Company.

Manufacturing Processes: Catalyst fertilizers are produced via diverse methods, including the established contact and Haber-Bosch processes, and emerging techniques like electrochemical synthesis. Each process offers unique advantages regarding efficiency, cost, and environmental impact. Metal Composition: The catalytic activity hinges on the choice of metal. This ranges from cost-effective base metals such as nickel and copper, to high-performance precious metals like platinum and palladium. The selection is optimized for specific fertilizer types and production goals, balancing catalytic performance with economic viability. Applications Across Fertilizer Types: Catalysts are integral to the efficient production of both nitrogen-based fertilizers (urea, ammonium nitrate, etc.) and phosphate-based fertilizers (phosphoric acid, various phosphate salts). Their use significantly enhances yield and reduces production costs, leading to more affordable and accessible fertilizers. Catalyst Support Materials: The effectiveness of the catalyst is further enhanced by the choice of support materials. These materials provide a large surface area for the active metal, improve stability, and tailor the catalyst's properties for optimal performance. Common support materials include alumina, silica, and zeolites. Recent developments include: July 2021: Clariant expanded its pollution control catalyst production facility in Germany to meet growing demand.

, April 2023: Clariant opened a new CATOFIN® catalyst facility in China, specializing in catalysts for olefin production.. Key drivers for this market are: Rising Crop Production: Population growth and changing dietary habits demand increased agricultural output, fueling fertilizer demand.

Government Incentives: Government subsidies and tax breaks encourage fertilizer use, particularly in developing countries.. Potential restraints include: Environmental Concerns: Fertilizer overdose and runoff can harm soil health and water quality, leading to environmental regulations.. Notable trends are: Need for improved crop yield and quality is driving the market growth.

The global water-soluble fertilizer market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for high-yield crops and the rising adoption of precision agriculture techniques. The market, currently valued at approximately $15 billion (this is an estimated value based on typical market sizes for similar agricultural inputs), is projected to witness a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7% from 2025 to 2033, reaching a market size of approximately $25 billion by 2033. This growth is primarily fueled by several key factors. Firstly, the escalating global population necessitates increased food production, leading to higher fertilizer consumption. Secondly, the shift towards sustainable agricultural practices, including precision farming methods that optimize fertilizer application, is boosting demand for efficient water-soluble fertilizers. These fertilizers offer targeted nutrient delivery, minimizing environmental impact and maximizing crop yields. Furthermore, favorable government policies supporting agricultural modernization and technological advancements in fertilizer production are contributing to market expansion. However, certain restraints limit the market's potential. Fluctuations in raw material prices, particularly potash and phosphate, can impact production costs and profitability. Also, the high initial investment required for advanced fertilizer application technologies might hinder adoption in certain regions, particularly in developing countries with limited resources. Nevertheless, the market is expected to overcome these challenges, owing to the long-term growth potential driven by the aforementioned factors. Segment-wise, the market is diversified, with key players like Nutrien, Israel Chemical, and SQM dominating the landscape. Regional analysis indicates significant growth potential in developing economies, where agricultural intensification is rapidly underway. The market is expected to be segmented by type (NPK, Urea, etc.), crop type, application method, and region. The competitive landscape is characterized by both large multinational corporations and smaller regional players, creating a dynamic and ever-evolving market.

The global NPK fertilizer market, valued at $41.76 billion in 2025, is projected to experience steady growth, driven primarily by the increasing demand for food production to meet the needs of a growing global population. Rising arable land scarcity and the need for enhanced crop yields are key factors fueling the demand for efficient fertilizers like NPK, which provides a balanced supply of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) – essential nutrients for optimal plant growth. The market is segmented by application (wheat, rice, maize, fruits & vegetables, others) and type (chlorine-based, sulfur-based, nitro-based, urea-based), each exhibiting varying growth rates based on regional agricultural practices and crop preferences. While chlorine-based compounds currently dominate, the demand for sulfur-based and nitro-based fertilizers is anticipated to grow steadily due to their effectiveness in specific soil conditions and crop types. Furthermore, advancements in fertilizer technology are leading to the development of more efficient and environmentally friendly NPK formulations, addressing concerns related to soil health and sustainability. Major players such as Yara, EuroChem, and others are investing in research and development, expanding production capacities, and forging strategic partnerships to capitalize on this growing market. The market’s compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 2.8% from 2025 to 2033 suggests a consistent, albeit moderate, expansion. This growth is expected to be influenced by factors like government initiatives promoting sustainable agricultural practices, technological improvements in fertilizer application techniques, and fluctuating raw material prices. However, certain restraints, including environmental concerns regarding fertilizer runoff and potential negative impacts on water quality, could moderate growth. Regional variations in growth are anticipated, with developing economies in Asia-Pacific and parts of Africa showing greater potential due to rapidly expanding agricultural sectors. North America and Europe, while exhibiting steady growth, might see slower expansion due to already established agricultural practices and stringent environmental regulations. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of large multinational corporations and regional players, with ongoing mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances shaping the market dynamics.

The global fertilizer crusher market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for fertilizers to support global food production and rising agricultural activities worldwide. The market's expansion is fueled by several factors, including the growing adoption of precision farming techniques, the need for efficient fertilizer application, and the increasing focus on sustainable agricultural practices. Technological advancements in crusher design, leading to improved efficiency and reduced energy consumption, are further stimulating market growth. While the precise market size in 2025 is unavailable, considering a plausible CAGR (let's assume 7% based on industry averages for similar equipment markets) from a hypothetical 2019 base of $2 billion, the market could be valued at approximately $2.8 billion in 2025. This growth is expected to continue throughout the forecast period (2025-2033), though the CAGR might fluctuate slightly due to factors like raw material price volatility and global economic conditions. Major players like AZEUS Fertilizer Machinery, Whirlston Organic Fertilizer Machinery, and others are actively contributing to market expansion through product innovation and strategic partnerships. However, challenges remain, including the high initial investment cost of sophisticated crusher technology and stringent environmental regulations regarding fertilizer production and waste management. Despite these restraints, the long-term outlook for the fertilizer crusher market remains positive, with significant growth potential in emerging economies experiencing rapid agricultural development. Market segmentation by crusher type (jaw crusher, impact crusher, etc.), application (NPK fertilizers, Urea, Phosphates), and geography will continue to shape market dynamics. Further research into specific regional data will provide more granular insights into market opportunities within individual regions.

Fossil-Free Fertilizer Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global fossil-free fertilizer market size reached USD 3.8 billion in 2024, reflecting a robust expansion driven by the urgent global shift toward sustainable agriculture and decarbonization initiatives. The market is projected to advance at a CAGR of 12.9% from 2025 to 2033, culminating in a forecasted market size of USD 11.1 billion by 2033. This impressive growth is primarily attributed to increasing regulatory mandates, technological advancements in green ammonia production, and heightened consumer awareness regarding environmental preservation. As per our latest research, the fossil-free fertilizer market is experiencing a paradigm shift, with industry stakeholders and governments aligning to accelerate the adoption of sustainable fertilizer solutions.

A key growth factor propelling the fossil-free fertilizer market is the mounting pressure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with traditional fertilizer production. Conventional fertilizers, predominantly derived from fossil fuels, contribute significantly to carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide emissions. As global climate targets become more ambitious, agricultural sectors are under scrutiny to decarbonize their input chains. This has catalyzed investments in innovative production methods such as green hydrogen-based ammonia synthesis and the recycling of nutrients from organic waste streams. As a result, industry leaders are increasingly prioritizing research and development in fossil-free fertilizer technologies, fostering a competitive landscape that rewards sustainability and innovation.

Another significant driver is the intensifying demand for organic and sustainably produced food products. Consumers and retailers are increasingly scrutinizing the environmental credentials of agricultural supply chains. This trend is compelling farmers and agribusinesses to adopt fossil-free fertilizers to enhance their sustainability profiles and meet the requirements of eco-conscious markets. Furthermore, international organizations and governments are introducing incentives, subsidies, and mandates to encourage the use of bio-based and green hydrogen-derived fertilizers. These policy measures are creating a favorable environment for market expansion, particularly in regions with advanced agricultural infrastructure and progressive regulatory frameworks.

Technological advancements are also playing a pivotal role in accelerating the adoption of fossil-free fertilizers. Breakthroughs in electrolysis technology for green hydrogen production, improvements in nutrient recovery from waste, and enhanced precision agriculture techniques are making fossil-free fertilizers more accessible and cost-competitive. These innovations are not only reducing the carbon footprint of fertilizer production but also improving nutrient use efficiency, thereby minimizing runoff and environmental degradation. As the cost gap between conventional and fossil-free fertilizers narrows, a broader spectrum of end-users, from large-scale agribusinesses to smallholder farmers, is expected to transition toward sustainable fertilizer options.

Regionally, Europe is at the forefront of the fossil-free fertilizer market, driven by stringent environmental regulations, ambitious climate targets, and strong public and private sector collaboration. North America is also witnessing substantial growth, supported by technological innovation and growing consumer demand for sustainably produced food. Meanwhile, the Asia Pacific region is emerging as a significant market due to its vast agricultural base, increasing government initiatives for sustainable farming, and rapid urbanization. Each region presents unique opportunities and challenges, with local policies, infrastructure, and consumer preferences shaping the pace and trajectory of market development.

Product Type Analysis

The fossil-free fertilizer market is segmented by product type into ammonia-based, nitrate-based, urea-based, phosphate-bas

The global potato fertilizer market is a dynamic sector experiencing significant growth, driven by the increasing global demand for potatoes as a staple food crop. While precise market size figures for 2025 aren't provided, considering a plausible CAGR of 5% (a reasonable estimate for agricultural inputs given global population growth and increasing food security concerns) and assuming a 2019 market size of $10 billion (a logical estimate given the scale of the potato farming industry), the 2025 market size could be projected to around $12.8 billion. This growth is fueled by several key factors. Firstly, the rising global population necessitates increased potato production to meet the growing food demand. Secondly, advancements in agricultural technology and farming practices, such as precision fertilization techniques, are enhancing yields and boosting the demand for specialized potato fertilizers. Thirdly, increasing consumer awareness of the nutritional benefits of potatoes is driving consumption, thereby indirectly increasing the demand for fertilizers that support higher yields and better quality. However, several challenges impede market growth. Fluctuations in raw material prices (e.g., phosphate and potash) significantly impact fertilizer costs, potentially affecting affordability and profitability for farmers. Furthermore, stringent environmental regulations regarding fertilizer use, aimed at mitigating water pollution and soil degradation, pose constraints on market expansion. The market is segmented based on fertilizer type (NPK, DAP, Urea, etc.), application method (granular, liquid), and geography. Major players like Yara, EuroChem, and Phosagro dominate the market, with increasing competition from Chinese manufacturers. Regional variations in market growth are anticipated, influenced by factors such as farming practices, government policies, and climate conditions. The future growth trajectory will depend on navigating challenges related to sustainability, cost management, and regulatory compliance while leveraging technological advancements to enhance potato production efficiency.

IntroductionWarm- and cool-season forages cultivated for hay production are grown on about 1.4 million acres in Arkansas (USDA-NASS, 2023). Bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] is grown for hay and pasture which helps sustain cattle production in western Arkansas. Phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) are essential macronutrients for forage production. Forage uptake and removal of N and K are nearly equal (≈45 lb N or K/ton forage) and eight to ten times greater than P uptake and removal (≈5 lb P/ton). Poultry litter has been the primary soil amendment and nutrient source applied to forages in western Arkansas for years. However, the use of poultry litter as a nutrient source is now limited or prohibited due to regulations that limit the rate or sometimes prohibit its application on soils that contain high soil-test P or have features that are conducive to P transport via run-off. Sustaining high forage yields will require judicious use of inorganic fertilizer and soil amendments. Growers may choose to apply little or no fertilizer and produce forage yields that are likely to be low and decline over time or apply commercial fertilizer to eliminate these nutrients as yield limiting factors.Objective: Field trials were initiated in 2006 to collect data that describe the relationships between soil-test P and K, nutrient uptake, and bermudagrass forage yield responses to fertilizer-P and -K rates.Materials and MethodSite DescriptionFertilization trials were initiated in April 2006 in a field of established to common bermudagrass on a Captina silt loam (Fine-silty, siliceous, active, mesic Typic Fragiudults) at the Shult Agricultural Research Experiment Station (MAES30) located in Fayetteville, Arkansas, in April 2007, in a commercial field (CityFarm) of established ‘Midland’ bermudagrass on a Johnsburg silt loam (Fine-silty, mixed, active, mesic Aquic Fragiudults) near Fayetteville, Arkansas, and in April 2011 on a Barling silt loam (Coarse-silty, mixed, active, thermic Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts) with an established stand of ‘Midland 99’ bermudagrass on a commercial farm (ElPaso) located near El Paso, Arkansas. The Captina soil had been used for hay production and grazing with a history of manure application. The Johnsburg silt loam had received biosolid applications for several years, but none since 2003 and was used only for hay production. The Captina site was managed with no irrigation, but the Johnsburg site was irrigated once in early September 2007. The plots were 20-ft long and 5-ft (MAES30) or 6-ft (CityFarm and ElPaso) wide. The MAES30 trials were established and maintained for 5 consecutive years (2006-2010), whereas the CityFarm (2007-2008) and ElPaso (2011-2012) trials were maintained for 2 consecutive years. The forage at each site was not a pure stand of bermudagrass and contained other warm-season grasses (see the annual W. E. Sabbe Arkansas soil fertility studies publications).Soil AnalysisComposite soil samples were collected from each plot to a depth of 4 inches to determine the initial soil chemical properties and uniformity among plots. Each composite soil sample consisted of eight soil cores. Soils were dried at 120-130°F, crushed to pass a 2-mm diameter sieve, analyzed for water pH (1:2 soil weight to water volume ratio; Sikora et al., 2014), and extracted for plant-available nutrients using the Mehlich-3 method (Zhang et al., 2014). Soil organic matter was determined on selected samples using the loss on ignition method (Zhang & Wang, 2014). Pelletized lime (1000 lb/acre) was applied to the MAES30 on 27 September 2006 to adjust the soil pH. The P-rates and K-rates experiments were randomized complete block designs with each fertilizer rate replicated five times.Phosphorus Treatments ApplicationTriple superphosphate was applied in 1-3 three split applications for five season-total fertilizer-P rates plus a no-P control. Phosphorus fertilizer treatments were applied before green-up and following the first and second harvests. Blanket application of 100 lb K2O/acre was applied before green-up and repeated when N fertilizer was applied to each site. The green-up application of N fertilizer consisted of 100 lb (NH4)2SO4/acre plus 300 lb NH4NO3/acre at each site (≈120 lb N/acre). Following each harvest on the Captina, 120 lb N/acre (358 lb NH4NO3/acre) was applied to stimulate forage production resulting in a season total of 360 lb N/acre. For the Johnsburg soil, 90 lb N/acre as NH4NO3 was applied following each harvest for a season total of 300 lb N/acre. For the Barling soil, 150 lb muriate of potash/acre and 260 lb urea/acre were applied at green-up. Following each harvest, the trial on the Barling soil received 150 lb muriate of potash and 80 to 100 lb urea-N/acre.Potassium Treatments ApplicationMuriate of potash was applied in 1-3 split applications for five fertilizer-K rates plus a no-K control. Potassium treatments were applied before green-up and following the first and second harvests. Blanket application of 100 lb triple superphosphate/acre, 100 lb (NH4)2SO4/acre, and 300 lb NH4NO3/acre were applied (≈120 lb N/acre) to the Captina and Johnsburg sites. Following each harvest on the Captina, applications of 120 lb N/acre as NH4NO3 were made to stimulate forage production resulting in a season-total N rate of 360 lb N/acre. For the Johnsburg soil, 90 lb N/acre as NH4NO3 was applied following each harvest for a season total of ~300 lb N/acre. For the trial on the Barling soil, P [150 lb 12-40-0-10S-1Zn/acre, sold as MicroEssentials (MESZ)] and N fertilizers (260 lb urea/acre) were applied at green-up. After subsequent harvests, the trials received 80 to 100 lb urea-N plus 100 lb MESZ or ammonium sulfate/acre.Weed ManagementWeed control at the MAES30 site was performed by applying glyphosate (Roundup WeatherMax at 1 pt/acre) before green-up to suppress/control winter weeds in 2007. Cimarron Max (2 qt/acre of 2,4-D + dicamba plus 0.5 oz metsulfuron/acre) was applied following the first harvest in 2006 and 2009 primarily to control buckhorn plantain.HarvestBermudagrass forage was harvested by cutting an 18-ft long by 3.8-ft wide swath with a self-propelled sickle-bar mower at a height of 2.0 to 2.5 inches. The forage was harvested 3-4 times a year at a targeted interval of 28-35 days. Some harvest times were delayed due to poor growth caused by lack of rainfall. The freshly cut biomass from each plot was weighed and eventually adjusted to a total dry weight expressed as lb dry forage/acre by recording the weight (≈500 g) of a subsample of fresh forage which was subsequently dried to a constant weight in a forced draft oven at 60°C and weighed again for dry weight. A shrink factor was calculated and used to adjust total fresh forage weight to a dry weight basis. Subsamples of forage were ground to pass a 1-mm sieve and digested in concentrated HNO3 and 30% H2O2 to determine forage P and K concentrations and calculation of K uptake and removal.Annual reports of the trials published by Slaton et al. (2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, & 2012) in W. E. Sabbe Arkansas soil fertility studies, research series 548, 558, 569, 578, 588, 599, and 608 (https://scholarworks.uark.edu/aaesser/) provide additional details on the management.Funding for forage studies was provided by Fertilizer Tonnage Fees administered by the Arkansas Soil Test Review Board and the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture.ReferencesSikora, F. J., & Kissel, D. E. (2014). Soil pH. In Sikora F. J. & K. P. Moore (Eds), Soil test methods from the southeastern United States (pp. 48–53). Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 419. Athens, GA: University of Georgia. http://aesl.ces.uga.edu/sera6/PUB/MethodsManualFinalSERA6.pdfUSDA-NASS. United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2023. Available at https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/results/F1704B27-0098-3977-97C4-17C12DE026D6 [Accessed on 12/08/2023]Zhang, H., Hardy, D. H., Mylavarapu, R., & Wang, J. J. (2014). Mehlich-3. In Sikora F. J. & Moore K. P. (Eds), Soil test methods from the southeastern United States (pp. 101–110). Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 419. Athens, GA: University of Georgia. http://aesl.ces.uga.edu/sera6/PUB/MethodsManualFinalSERA6.pdfZhang, H., & Wang, J. J. (2014). Loss on Ignition. In Sikora F. J. & Moore K. P. (Eds), Soil test methods from the southeastern United States (pp. 155–157). Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 419. Athens, GA: University of Georgia. http://aesl.ces.uga.edu/sera6/PUB/MethodsManualFinalSERA6.pdf

According to Cognitive Market Research, The Non-Protein Nitrogen Market will be USD XX Billion in 2023 and is set to achieve a market size of USD XX Billion by the end of 2031 growing at a CAGR of XX% from 2024 to 2031. Asia Pacific held the major market share for more than XX% of the global revenue with a market size of USD XX million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of XX % from 2024 to 2031. The North American region is the fastest-growing market with a CAGR of XX% from 2024 to 2031 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of XX% in the future. Europe accounted for a market share of over XX% of the global revenue with a USD XX million market size. Latin America had a market share for more than XX% of the global revenue with a market size of USD XX million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of XX% from 2024 to 2031. Middle East and Africa had a market share of around XX% of the global revenue and was estimated at a market size of USD XX million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of XX% from 2024 to 2031. The Non-Protein Nitrogen Market held the highest market revenue share in 2024. Market Dynamics of the Non-Protein Nitrogen Market

Key Drivers for The Non-Protein Nitrogen Market

Increased meat consumption will fuel market expansion of non-nitrogen proteins

The market for non-protein nitrogen is anticipated to increase at a faster rate in the future due to rising meat consumption. The term "meat" refers to the edible muscle tissue of animals—usually birds or mammals—that people eat. By enabling bacteria in the ruminant stomach to transform substances like urea, biuret, and ammonium phosphate into proteins, non-protein nitrogen in feed can increase the total protein content and nutritional value of meat products. For instance, in march 2023 The Australian Bureau of Statistics, an Australian government institution, reports that the output of beef climbed by 11.3% to 524,335 tons. In addition, mutton output rose to 58,662 tons, a 31.8% rise. Thus, the non-protein nitrogen market is driven by rising meat consumption. Source:(https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/industry/agriculture/livestock-products-australia/mar-2023) Thus, the Increased meat consumption is poised to drive market expansion for non-protein nitrogen, as demand for livestock feed additives rises to optimize production efficiency and meet the nutritional needs of a growing meat industry, aligning with the broader trend of rising meat consumption worldwide.

The market for non-nitrogen proteins rises in response to a rising global population of livestock.

The market for non-protein nitrogen is anticipated to develop in the future because to the growing number of animals. Domesticated animals produced by people for commercial, recreational, or agricultural purposes are referred to as livestock. Non-protein nitrogen supplements, like urea, are essential for livestock nutrition because they offer a cost-effective substitute for conventional protein sources, improve feed efficiency, and meet the higher production needs that come with a bigger herd. For instance, in September 2022 A study published in 2021 by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics states that the number of hogs and pigs increased by 3.2% to 42.25 million. Thus, the market for non-protein nitrogen is expanding as a result of the growing number of cattle. Source:(https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022/2022-population-estimates.html) For instance, as of September 2022, the U.S. Census Bureau a US government agency reported that the number of residents in the US had grown by 0.4%, or 1,256,003, to 333,287,557. Consequently, the market for Non-Nitrogen Proteins is being driven by the rising food demands of a growing population. Source:(https://www.nass.usda.gov/AgCensus/) Thus, the growing population of livestock is expected to fuel market growth for non-protein nitrogen, as the need to sustainably feed and nourish an expanding livestock population drives up demand for supplements that enhance feed efficiency, promote animal health, and support increased productivity to meet the demands of a growing global population.

Restraint Factor for The Non-Protein Nitrogen Market

Ruminant toxicity of non-protein nitrogen restrains the market

In ruminant diets, non-protein nitrogen is used more frequently. A...

The global agricultural fertilizer additives market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for enhanced fertilizer efficiency and crop yields. The market, valued at approximately $5 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 5% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated market value exceeding $7.5 billion by 2033. This growth is fueled by several key factors, including the rising global population, increasing food security concerns, and the adoption of advanced agricultural practices. The prevalent use of anti-caking agents, colorants, and granulation auxiliaries in fertilizer production significantly contributes to the market's expansion. Regional variations exist, with North America and Europe currently holding substantial market share due to advanced agricultural techniques and established fertilizer industries. However, the Asia-Pacific region is expected to witness significant growth in the coming years, driven by the rapid expansion of agricultural activities in countries like India and China. Key players in the market, including Novochem Group, Solvay, ArrMaz Products, and Clariant, are continuously innovating and developing new additives to improve fertilizer performance and address environmental concerns. The market's growth, however, is not without challenges. Factors such as stringent environmental regulations regarding fertilizer usage and fluctuating raw material prices pose potential restraints. Furthermore, the development and adoption of sustainable and eco-friendly fertilizer additives are gaining traction, presenting both opportunities and challenges for market participants. The market segmentation by application (urea, ammonium nitrate, etc.) and type (anti-caking agents, colorants, etc.) provides a nuanced understanding of the market dynamics. Future growth will likely depend on the successful development of innovative, cost-effective, and environmentally sound additives that meet the evolving needs of the agricultural sector. The ongoing research and development efforts focused on improving fertilizer efficiency and reducing environmental impact will play a crucial role in shaping the future trajectory of this market. This comprehensive report provides an in-depth analysis of the global agricultural fertilizer additives market, projected to reach $8.5 billion by 2028. It delves into market dynamics, key players, emerging trends, and future growth opportunities. The report is meticulously crafted to offer actionable insights for stakeholders across the value chain, including manufacturers, distributors, and end-users. Keywords: agricultural fertilizer additives, anti-caking agents, granulation auxiliaries, fertilizer colorants, urea additives, ammonium nitrate additives, phosphate fertilizer additives, market analysis, market trends, market size, market share, industry growth.

The agricultural nano fertilizer market is experiencing significant growth, driven by increasing demand for sustainable and efficient agricultural practices. The market is valued at XXX million in 2025 and is projected to reach XXX million by 2033, expanding at a CAGR of XX% during the forecast period from 2025 to 2033. Nanotechnology in agriculture has led to the development of innovative fertilizers that enhance nutrient delivery to plants, promoting crop yield and reducing environmental impact. Factors driving market growth include the increasing adoption of precision farming techniques, the rising demand for high-quality agricultural products, and government initiatives to promote sustainable agriculture. Key trends shaping the market include the development of nano-encapsulated fertilizers, targeted delivery systems, and controlled-release technologies. Restraining factors include the high cost of production and regulatory challenges associated with the use of nanotechnology in agriculture. Major market segments include application areas such as soil, foliar, and seed treatment, as well as different types of nano fertilizers, including nano-urea, nano-phosphate, and nano-potash. Key players in the market include IFFCO, Lazuriton Nano Biotechnology, Fanavar Nano-Pazhoohesh Markazi, Tropical Agrosystem, and Shan Maw Myae Trading, among others.

The challenge facing Ethiopian farmers are the combination of low soil fertility and reduced agricultural productivity. The study aimed to quantify nitrogen and phosphorus-containing fertilizers for tef production in Sekota and Lasta-Lalibela districts, using four nitrogen and three phosphorus levels from urea and triple super phosphate sources. The Results showed that nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers significantly affected tef yield and yield components. Application of nitrogen at the rate of 92 kg ha-1 increased tef grain yield by 131.01%, 87.78% and 182.23% in Woleh, Sayda and Lasta Lalibela districts, respectively, compared to control treatment. Similarly, 23 kg ha-1 phosphorus increased tef grain yield by 7.42 and 8.52% in Woleh and Lasta Lalibela, respectively. In Lalibela and Woleh, the application of 92 kg N ha-1 resulted in a maximum net benefits of 2099.6 and 2007 United States Dollar (USD) respectively. Furthermore, in Sayda, the application of 92 kg N ha-1 and 23 kg P2O5 ha-1 yielded a net benefit of 1812.55 USD. The marginal rate of return (MRR) from these applications was 539.6% in Lalibela, 781% in Woleh and 352.44% in Sayda. Therefore, application of 92 N and 23 kg P2O5 ha-1 is appropriate for maximum tef production in Sekota and Lasta districts of Amhara region. Further research and extension services should focus on promoting the adoption of these optimized fertilizer practices among smallholder farmers to maximize the sustainable production of tef.

The challenge facing Ethiopian farmers are the combination of low soil fertility and reduced agricultural productivity. The study aimed to quantify nitrogen and phosphorus-containing fertilizers for tef production in Sekota and Lasta-Lalibela districts, using four nitrogen and three phosphorus levels from urea and triple super phosphate sources. The Results showed that nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers significantly affected tef yield and yield components. Application of nitrogen at the rate of 92 kg ha-1 increased tef grain yield by 131.01%, 87.78% and 182.23% in Woleh, Sayda and Lasta Lalibela districts, respectively, compared to control treatment. Similarly, 23 kg ha-1 phosphorus increased tef grain yield by 7.42 and 8.52% in Woleh and Lasta Lalibela, respectively. In Lalibela and Woleh, the application of 92 kg N ha-1 resulted in a maximum net benefits of 2099.6 and 2007 United States Dollar (USD) respectively. Furthermore, in Sayda, the application of 92 kg N ha-1 and 23 kg P2O5 ha-1 yielded a net benefit of 1812.55 USD. The marginal rate of return (MRR) from these applications was 539.6% in Lalibela, 781% in Woleh and 352.44% in Sayda. Therefore, application of 92 N and 23 kg P2O5 ha-1 is appropriate for maximum tef production in Sekota and Lasta districts of Amhara region. Further research and extension services should focus on promoting the adoption of these optimized fertilizer practices among smallholder farmers to maximize the sustainable production of tef.

Prolonged and excessive use of chemical fertilizers has resulted in serious harm to soil health and ecosystems. This study aimed to reduce the cultivation costs for apricot trees, nearly 1/3rd of which are spent on fertilizers. The research was conducted on fully grown apricot trees of the cultivar “New Castle,” in the Solan district of Himachal Pradesh, India. The experiment consisted of fourteen treatment combinations evaluated in triplicate and statistically analyzed using a randomized block design (RBD). Results revealed that treatment T12 [50% Nitrogen (Calcium Nitrate) + 50% Nitrogen (Urea) + Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + Vermicompost] resulted in the highest percent increase in tree trunk girth (6.82%), highest leaf chlorophyll content (3.00 mg g−1 fresh weight), leaf area (58.29 cm), fruit set (61.00%) and total yield (61.9 kg tree−1). In terms of nutrient status, T12 had the highest leaf N (2.95%), leaf K (2.60%), soil N (386.33 kg ha−1), soil P (51.00 kg ha−1) and soil organic carbon (1.81%). The highest net return and profit over recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) was also recorded in treatment T12. The results of this study show that judicious fertilizer use along with integrated organic manure and bio-fertilizers can reduce cultivation costs, improve soil health, and increase fruit production with minimum ecosystem damage.