Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The goal of our research is to identify malicious advertisement URLs and to apply adversarial attack on ensembles. We extract lexical and web-scrapped features from using python code. And then 4 machine learning algorithms are applied for the classification process and then used the K-Means clustering for the visual understanding. We check the vulnerability of the models by the adversarial examples. We applied Zeroth Order Optimization adversarial attack on the models and compute the attack accuracy.
Context Malicious URLs or malicious website is a very serious threat to cybersecurity. Malicious URLs host unsolicited content (spam, phishing, drive-by downloads, etc.) and lure unsuspecting users to become victims of scams (monetary loss, theft of private information, and malware installation), and cause losses of billions of dollars every year. We have collected this dataset to include a large number of examples of Malicious URLs so that a machine learning-based model can be developed to identify malicious urls so that we can stop them in advance before infecting computer system or spreading through inteinternet.
Content we have collected a huge dataset of 651,191 URLs, out of which 428103 benign or safe URLs, 96457 defacement URLs, 94111 phishing URLs, and 32520 malware URLs. Figure 2 depicts their distribution in terms of percentage. As we know one of the most crucial tasks is to curate the dataset for a machine learning project. We have curated this dataset from five different sources.
For collecting benign, phishing, malware and defacement URLs we have used URL dataset (ISCX-URL-2016) For increasing phishing and malware URLs, we have used Malware domain black list dataset. We have increased benign URLs using faizan git repo At last, we have increased more number of phishing URLs using Phishtank dataset and PhishStorm dataset As we have told you that dataset is collected from different sources. So firstly, we have collected the URLs from different sources into a separate data frame and finally merge them to retain only URLs and their class type.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The dataset contains DNS records, IP-related features, WHOIS/RDAP information, information from TLS handshakes and certificates, and GeoIP information for 368,956 benign domains from Cisco Umbrella, 461,338 benign domains from the actual CESNET network traffic, 164,425 phishing domains from PhishTank and OpenPhish services, and 100,809 malware domains from various sources like ThreatFox, The Firebog, MISP threat intelligence platform, and other sources. The ground truth for the phishing dataset was double-check with the VirusTotal (VT) service. Domain names not considered malicious by VT have been removed from phishing and malware datasets. Similarly, benign domain names that were considered risky by VT have been removed from the benign datasets. The data was collected between March 2023 and July 2024. The final assessment of the data was conducted in August 2024.
The dataset is useful for cybersecurity research, e.g. statistical analysis of domain data or feature extraction for training machine learning-based classifiers, e.g. for phishing and malware website detection.
The data is located in the following individual files:
Both files contain a JSON array of records generated using mongoexport. The following table documents the structure of a record. Please note that:
Field name |
Field type |
Nullable |
Description |
domain_name |
String |
No |
The evaluated domain name |
url |
String |
No |
The source URL for the domain name |
evaluated_on |
Date |
No |
Date of last collection attempt |
source |
String |
No |
An identifier of the source |
sourced_on |
Date |
No |
Date of ingestion of the domain name |
dns |
Object |
Yes |
Data from DNS scan |
rdap |
Object |
Yes |
Data from RDAP or WHOIS |
tls |
Object |
Yes |
Data from TLS handshake |
ip_data |
Array of Objects |
Yes |
Array of data objects capturing the IP addresses related to the domain name |
DNS data (dns field) | |||
A |
Array of Strings |
No |
Array of IPv4 addresses |
AAAA |
Array of Strings |
No |
Array of IPv6 addresses |
TXT |
Array of Strings |
No |
Array of raw TXT values |
CNAME |
Object |
No |
The CNAME target and related IPs |
MX |
Array of Objects |
No |
Array of objects with the MX target hostname, priority and related IPs |
NS |
Array of Objects |
No |
Array of objects with the NS target hostname and related IPs |
SOA |
Object |
No |
All the SOA fields, present if found at the target domain name |
zone_SOA |
Object |
No |
The SOA fields of the target’s zone (closest point of delegation), present if found and not a record in the target domain directly |
dnssec |
Object |
No |
Flags describing the DNSSEC validation result for each record type |
ttls |
Object |
No |
The TTL values for each record type |
remarks |
Object |
No |
The zone domain name and DNSSEC flags |
RDAP data (rdap field) | |||
copyright_notice |
String |
No |
RDAP/WHOIS data usage copyright notice |
dnssec |
Bool |
No |
DNSSEC presence flag |
entitites |
Object |
No |
An object with various arrays representing the found related entity types (e.g. abuse, admin, registrant). The arrays contain objects describing the individual entities. |
expiration_date |
Date |
Yes |
The current date of expiration |
handle |
String |
No |
RDAP handle |
last_changed_date |
Date |
Yes |
The date when the domain was last changed |
name |
String |
No |
The target domain name for which the data in this object are stored |
nameservers |
Array of Strings |
No |
Nameserver hostnames provided by RDAP or WHOIS |
registration_date |
Date |
Yes |
First registration date |
status |
Array of Strings |
In the second half of 2021, websites regarding manufacturing were the most common websites to be targeted by malicious URL redirections, with 39 percent of detected cases being found on these sites. Although manufacturing websites have been a common target for malware attacks before, finds on these sites have largely increased compared to the first half of the year, which recorded around 23 percent of cases redirecting through that industry.
MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
This dataset was created by kianindeed
Released under MIT
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Summary of previous works on malicious URL detection.
https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The global market for suspicious file and URL analysis is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach $88 million in 2025 and maintain a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 6.4% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is driven by the escalating sophistication of cyber threats, the increasing reliance on digital infrastructure across various sectors, and the growing need for proactive security measures to mitigate risks associated with malicious files and URLs. The market's segmentation reveals a strong preference for cloud-based solutions, offering scalability and accessibility to organizations of all sizes. Large enterprises are the primary consumers, reflecting their higher vulnerability to advanced cyberattacks and their greater capacity for investment in robust security solutions. However, the market is also seeing significant adoption among SMEs, driven by the increasing affordability and ease of use of cloud-based solutions and a rising awareness of the risks associated with malicious online content. Several factors contribute to market growth. The development and proliferation of advanced malware necessitates continuous improvement in threat detection and analysis capabilities. Furthermore, the expanding attack surface due to remote work and the increasing use of IoT devices are contributing to a heightened demand for effective file and URL analysis tools. Regulatory compliance requirements, particularly within sensitive industries like finance and healthcare, further incentivize organizations to invest in these solutions. Conversely, challenges such as the emergence of obfuscated malware, the high cost of advanced solutions, and the need for specialized expertise pose some restraints to broader market penetration. The competitive landscape is diverse, with established cybersecurity players and innovative startups offering a range of solutions catering to specific needs and budgets. This competitive pressure is ultimately beneficial for consumers, driving innovation and fostering a more efficient and effective market for suspicious file and URL analysis.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The dataset contains DNS records, IP-related features, WHOIS/RDAP information, information from TLS handshakes and certificates, and GeoIP information for 368,956 benign domains from Cisco Umbrella, 461,338 benign domains from the actual CESNET network traffic, 164,425 phishing domains from PhishTank and OpenPhish services, and 100,809 malware domains from various sources like ThreatFox, The Firebog, MISP threat intelligence platform, and other sources. The ground truth for the phishing dataset was double-check with the VirusTotal (VT) service. Domain names not considered malicious by VT have been removed from phishing and malware datasets. Similarly, benign domain names that were considered risky by VT have been removed from the benign datasets. The data was collected between March 2023 and July 2024. The final assessment of the data was conducted in August 2024.
The dataset is useful for cybersecurity research, e.g. statistical analysis of domain data or feature extraction for training machine learning-based classifiers, e.g. for phishing and malware website detection.
The dataset was created using software available in the associated GitHub repository nesfit/domainradar-dib.
The data is located in the following individual files:
Both files contain a JSON array of records generated using mongoexport (in the MongoDB Extended JSON (v2) format in Relaxed Mode). The following table documents the structure of a record. Please note that:
Field name |
Field type |
Nullable |
Description |
domain_name |
String |
No |
The evaluated domain name |
url |
String |
No |
The source URL for the domain name |
evaluated_on |
Date |
No |
Date of last collection attempt |
source |
String |
No |
An identifier of the source |
sourced_on |
Date |
No |
Date of ingestion of the domain name |
dns |
Object |
Yes |
Data from DNS scan |
rdap |
Object |
Yes |
Data from RDAP or WHOIS |
tls |
Object |
Yes |
Data from TLS handshake |
ip_data |
Array of Objects |
Yes |
Array of data objects capturing the IP addresses related to the domain name |
malware_type |
String |
No |
The malware type/family or “unknown” (only present in malware.json) |
DNS data (dns field) | |||
A |
Array of Strings |
No |
Array of IPv4 addresses |
AAAA |
Array of Strings |
No |
Array of IPv6 addresses |
TXT |
Array of Strings |
No |
Array of raw TXT values |
CNAME |
Object |
No |
The CNAME target and related IPs |
MX |
Array of Objects |
No |
Array of objects with the MX target hostname, priority and related IPs |
NS |
Array of Objects |
No |
Array of objects with the NS target hostname and related IPs |
SOA |
Object |
No |
All the SOA fields, present if found at the target domain name |
zone_SOA |
Object |
No |
The SOA fields of the target’s zone (closest point of delegation), present if found and not a record in the target domain directly |
dnssec |
Object |
No |
Flags describing the DNSSEC validation result for each record type |
ttls |
Object |
No |
The TTL values for each record type |
remarks |
Object |
No |
The zone domain name and DNSSEC flags |
RDAP data (rdap field) | |||
copyright_notice |
String |
No |
RDAP/WHOIS data usage copyright notice |
dnssec |
Bool |
No |
DNSSEC presence flag |
entitites |
Object |
No |
An object with various arrays representing the found related entity types (e.g. abuse, admin, registrant). The arrays contain objects describing the individual entities. |
expiration_date |
Date |
Yes |
The current date of expiration |
handle |
String |
No |
RDAP handle |
last_changed_date |
Date |
Yes |
The date when the domain was last changed |
name |
String |
No |
In 2023, the total detection cases of web-based malware sites in South Korea amounted to roughly 12.7 thousand, a slight decrease compared to the previous year. The highest number of detected web-based malware sites in South Korea was 47,703 cases in 2014. The type of web-based malware sites was comprised of distribution sites and staging sties.
This dataset was created by Shreeshail Chavan
https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy
The market for suspicious file and URL analysis is experiencing robust growth, driven by the escalating sophistication of cyber threats and the increasing reliance on digital infrastructure across various sectors. The $92 million market size in 2025, coupled with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.7%, projects substantial expansion to approximately $150 million by 2033. This growth is fueled by several key factors. The rising frequency and severity of ransomware attacks, phishing campaigns, and malware distribution necessitate robust security solutions for proactive threat detection and response. Furthermore, the expanding adoption of cloud-based services and the increasing interconnectedness of devices amplify the attack surface, thereby increasing the demand for advanced file and URL analysis capabilities. The growing awareness of data privacy regulations, such as GDPR and CCPA, also incentivizes organizations to enhance their security posture and invest in solutions that can effectively identify and mitigate potential threats. The market landscape is highly competitive, with a diverse range of players, from established cybersecurity giants like CrowdStrike, McAfee, and Symantec to specialized providers like Any.Run and Joe Sandbox. The market's segmentation likely includes solutions based on different analysis techniques (static, dynamic, sandbox-based), deployment models (cloud, on-premise), and target users (enterprise, SMB, individuals). While the provided data lacks regional specifics, it's reasonable to expect that North America and Europe will initially dominate market share, given their advanced cybersecurity infrastructure and high rates of digital adoption. However, emerging markets in Asia-Pacific and Latin America are poised for significant growth in the coming years, driven by rising digital literacy and economic expansion. Competition will intensify as vendors strive to offer innovative features, such as AI-powered threat detection and improved integration with existing security ecosystems.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The Web has long become a major platform for online criminal activities. URLs are used as the main vehicle in this domain. To counter this issues security community focused its efforts on developing techniques for mostly blacklisting of malicious URLs.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Web applications are important for various online businesses and operations because of their platform stability and low operation cost. The increasing usage of Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices within a network has contributed to the rise of network intrusion issues due to malicious Uniform Resource Locators (URLs). Generally, malicious URLs are initiated to promote scams, attacks, and frauds which can lead to high-risk intrusion. Several methods have been developed to detect malicious URLs in previous works. There has been a good amount of work done to detect malicious URLs using various methods such as random forest, regression, LightGBM, and more as reported in the literature. However, most of the previous works focused on the binary classification of malicious URLs and are tested on limited URL datasets. Nevertheless, the detection of malicious URLs remains a challenging task that remains open to research. Hence, this work proposed a stacking-based ensemble classifier to perform multi-class classification of malicious URLs on larger URL datasets to justify the robustness of the proposed method. This study focuses on obtaining lexical features directly from the URL to identify malicious websites. Then, the proposed stacking-based ensemble classifier is developed by integrating Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost. In addition, hyperparameter tuning was performed using the Randomized Search method to optimize the proposed classifier. The proposed stacking-based ensemble classifier aims to take advantage of the performance of each machine learning model and aggregate the output to improve prediction accuracy. The classification accuracies of the machine learning model when applied individually are 93.6%, 95.2%, 95.7% and 94.8% for random forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost respectively. The proposed stacking-based ensemble classifier has shown significant results in classifying four classes of malicious URLs (phishing, malware, defacement, and benign) with an average accuracy of 96.8% when benchmarked with previous works.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset is part of my PhD research on malware detection and classification using Deep Learning. It contains static analysis data: Top-1000 imported functions extracted from the 'pe_imports' elements of Cuckoo Sandbox reports. PE malware examples were downloaded from virusshare.com. PE goodware examples were downloaded from portableapps.com and from Windows 7 x86 directories.
Apache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
License information was derived automatically
This dataset was created by Zihan ZHAO_qq
Released under Apache 2.0
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset is a curated collection of over 800,000 URLs, designed to represent a variety of online domains. Approximately 52% of these domains are identified as legitimate entities, while the remaining 47% are categorised as phishing domains, indicating potential online threats. The dataset consists of two key columns: "url" and "status". The "status" column uses binary encoding, where 0 signifies phishing domains and 1 indicates legitimate domains. This balanced distribution between phishing and legitimate instances helps ensure the dataset's robustness for analysis and model development.
The dataset is provided in a CSV file format. It contains 808,042 unique entries. The distribution of statuses is approximately 394,982 entries flagged as phishing (0) and 427,028 entries flagged as legitimate (1). This offers an almost equal balance across the two categories.
This dataset is ideal for applications aimed at understanding, combating, and mitigating online threats. It can be used for developing models related to phishing detection, binary classification, and website analytics. It is also suitable for data cleaning exercises and projects involving Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Deep Learning.
The data collection for this dataset is global in scope. While a specific time range for data collection is not provided, the dataset was listed on 05/06/2025.
CCO
This dataset is particularly valuable for researchers and practitioners working in the fields of AI and Machine Learning. Intended users include those looking to: * Develop and train models for identifying malicious URLs. * Analyse patterns distinguishing legitimate websites from phishing attempts. * Enhance cybersecurity measures and protect users from online threats.
Original Data Source: Phishing and Legitimate URLS
In 2024, GoDaddy InfoSec researchers monitored and analyzed website security threats using Sucuri SiteCheck's remote scanning technology, which processed over 70 million website scans across all hosting providers globally. This analysis provides insights into attack patterns and malware campaigns affecting websites worldwide The GoDaddy InfoSec malware research team helps protect the broader web ecosystem through automated continuous threat monitoring and detailed analysis, benefiting both our customers and the wider internet community. Our researchers develop and maintain sophisticated detection signatures by analyzing new malware samples, tracking emerging campaigns, and reverse engineering attack methodologies. This proactive approach helps us to identify and block new threats before they can impact our customers. Through collaboration between our malware research and threat intelligence teams along with analysis of malware samples and attack patterns, our security researchers documented sophisticated traffic distribution systems, social engineering tactics, and new methods of malware delivery and persistence. Analysis of 1.1 million infected websites revealed that malware and malicious redirects dominated the threat landscape, accounting for 74.7% of detected infections. Our researchers saw an increasing number of threat actors using social engineering tactics like fake browser updates and captchas to lure website visitors into installing malware. Additionally, we saw major campaigns including Balada Injector (149,351 detections) and Sign1 (96,084 detections) leveraging traffic distribution systems to monetize compromised website traffic while employing sophisticated visitor profiling to avoid detection. The abuse of legitimate WordPress plugins and themes continued to be a significant trend, with campaigns storing malicious code in database options rather than files to evade traditional security controls. This technique was particularly evident in the DNS TXT Records campaign, which utilized WPCode to execute malicious PHP code while maintaining persistence through automated reactivation systems. Additionally, the increase in compromises through stolen administrative credentials highlighted the growing connection between endpoint security and website security. SEO spam techniques continued to evolve, affecting 422,741 websites globally through various methods. Japanese spam (117,393 detections) and gambling-related content (79,817 detections) represented the most prevalent spam categories, employing advanced cloaking techniques and geo-targeting capabilities to maintain effectiveness while avoiding detection.
https://whoisdatacenter.com/terms-of-use/https://whoisdatacenter.com/terms-of-use/
Explore the historical Whois records related to test-url-cat-malware.com (Domain). Get insights into ownership history and changes over time.
https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy
The website malware scanner market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the escalating frequency and sophistication of cyberattacks targeting websites. The increasing reliance on e-commerce and online services makes website security paramount, fueling demand for effective malware scanning solutions. While precise market sizing data is unavailable, a logical estimation based on the prevalence of website security concerns and the growth of related sectors like cybersecurity suggests a market size exceeding $2 billion in 2025, expanding at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 15% over the forecast period (2025-2033). This growth is propelled by several key factors including the rise of sophisticated malware, the increasing adoption of cloud-based security solutions, and growing regulatory pressures demanding robust website security measures. The market is segmented by deployment (cloud, on-premise), scanning type (static, dynamic), and organization size (SMEs, enterprises), with cloud-based solutions currently dominating due to their scalability and cost-effectiveness. The competitive landscape is fragmented, with a mix of established players like Invicti, Acunetix, and Qualys alongside numerous smaller, specialized providers. Differentiation is primarily achieved through features such as advanced detection capabilities, ease of use, integration with existing security infrastructures, and pricing models. The market is expected to witness increased consolidation through mergers and acquisitions, as larger players seek to expand their product portfolios and market share. Growth restraints include the potential for false positives, the complexity of integrating scanning tools into existing workflows, and the ongoing evolution of malware techniques, demanding continuous updates and improvements to scanner technology. Future trends point towards an increase in AI-powered malware detection, enhanced vulnerability management integration, and the adoption of blockchain technology for enhanced security and transparency.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
In recent years, with the development of the Internet, the attribution classification of APT malware remains an important issue in society. Existing methods have yet to consider the DLL link library and hidden file address during the execution process, and there are shortcomings in capturing the local and global correlation of event behaviors. Compared to the structural features of binary code, opcode features reflect the runtime instructions and do not consider the issue of multiple reuse of local operation behaviors within the same APT organization. Obfuscation techniques more easily influence attribution classification based on single features. To address the above issues, (1) an event behavior graph based on API instructions and related operations is constructed to capture the execution traces on the host using the GNNs model. (2) ImageCNTM captures the local spatial correlation and continuous long-term dependency of opcode images. (3) The word frequency and behavior features are concatenated and fused, proposing a multi-feature, multi-input deep learning model. We collected a publicly available dataset of APT malware to evaluate our method. The attribution classification results of the model based on a single feature reached 89.24% and 91.91%. Finally, compared to single-feature classifiers, the multi-feature fusion model achieves better classification performance.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The goal of our research is to identify malicious advertisement URLs and to apply adversarial attack on ensembles. We extract lexical and web-scrapped features from using python code. And then 4 machine learning algorithms are applied for the classification process and then used the K-Means clustering for the visual understanding. We check the vulnerability of the models by the adversarial examples. We applied Zeroth Order Optimization adversarial attack on the models and compute the attack accuracy.