President Trump's proposals to impose universal tariffs as well as tariffs on Chinese, Canadian, and Mexican imports would considerably increase the average tariff rate. It's estimated that, if put into effect, the average tariff rate including dutiable imports would reach almost 18 percent, up from two percent in 2024. Tariff rates are higher when dutiable imports are included because they refer only to goods that are actually subject to tariffs, rather than all imports. This skews the average tariff rate upward because it excludes duty-free goods. Trump's proposal for a universal 10 percent tariff on all imports would impose a flat tax on all imports, rather than just dutiable goods. This would result in a sharp increase in the overall tariff burden because previously duty-free goods would be taxed.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%) in China was reported at 2.18 % in 2022, according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized sources. China - Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products - actual values, historical data, forecasts and projections were sourced from the World Bank on May of 2025.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
<ul style='margin-top:20px;'>
<li>China tariff rates for 2020 was <strong>2.47%</strong>, a <strong>0.06% decline</strong> from 2019.</li>
<li>China tariff rates for 2019 was <strong>2.53%</strong>, a <strong>0.86% decline</strong> from 2018.</li>
<li>China tariff rates for 2018 was <strong>3.39%</strong>, a <strong>0.44% decline</strong> from 2017.</li>
</ul>Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.
On September 1, 2019, China imposed additional tariffs on ** billion U.S. dollars worth of the U.S. import goods. A trade war between the world's two largest economies was initiated by president Trump in mid-2018 and escalated further throughout 2019.
On September 1, 2019, the United States imposed import tariffs on *** billion U.S. dollars worth of Chinese goods, such as footwear, food products, and some home electronics. A trade war between the world's two largest economies was initiated by president Trump in mid-2018 and escalated further throughout 2019.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, all products (%) in China was reported at 5.36 % in 2022, according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized sources. China - Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, all products - actual values, historical data, forecasts and projections were sourced from the World Bank on May of 2025.
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset presents country-level tariff rates charged to the United States during the Trump administration, alongside discounted reciprocal tariffs the U.S. might have charged in return. It highlights the trade imbalances and protectionist policies in place at the time. Useful for trade policy analysis, political science research, and data visualization. The values were originally expressed in decimal format (e.g., 0.10 = 10%) but have been converted to percentage format for clarity. 📊 Column Descriptions ..Country The name of the country or economic union (e.g., China, European Union).
..Tariffs charged to the USA (%) The average tariff percentage imposed by each country on goods imported from the United States.
..U.S.A. Discounted Reciprocal Tariffs (%) Hypothetical reciprocal tariff rates the U.S. would charge if it applied the same discount factor used by the other country toward the U.S.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
We measure the tariff shocks by matching the U.S. products of Section 301 Tariffs with China provincial customs export data in 2017, the year before the trade war.First, based on the tariffed product lists released by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR), which specify products at the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) eight-digit code level, we calculate the proportion of tariffed product categories under each six-digit HTS code. For instance, under the U.S. HTS-6 code 6309.29 (tents of other textile material), the corresponding sub-code includes 6306.29.11 (tents of cotton) and 6306.29.21 (tents made of other materials), with only 6306.29.11 being subject to additional tariffs. Thus, the tariffed rate for HTS code 6309.29 is 50%.Second, since the HTS-6 codes are consistent under the Harmonized System (HS) across countries, we estimate the scale of Chinese export affected by the trade war by multiplying the export data of HS-6 products by the corresponding HTS-6 tariffed rate.Third, we further adjust for provincial differences by dividing each province’s tariff-affected export scale by its total export scale.Fourth, the intensity of tariffs varied across the four rounds of the trade war. In the first three rounds, listed products were subjected to a 25% tariff, whereas the fourth round, while covering nearly all remaining U.S.-bound exports, had a lower tariff rate (7.5%), following the signing of the “Phase One” trade agreement between China and the U.S. in January 2020. To account for these differences, we assign a weight of 0.25 to the first three rounds and a weight of 0.075 to the fourth round. The weighted sum serves as a proxy variable for the provincial exposure of the U.S.-China trade war.
In 2024, Chinese exports of trade goods to the United States amounted to about 438.95 billion U.S. dollars; a significant increase from 1985 levels, when imports from China amounted to about 3.86 billion U.S. dollars. U.S. exports to China Compared to U.S. imports from China, the value of U.S. exports to China in 2020 amounted to 427.23billion U.S. dollars. China is the United States’ largest trading partner, while China was the United States third largest goods export market. Some of the leading exports to China in the agricultural sector included soybeans, cotton, and pork products. Texas was the leading state that exported to China in 2020 based on total value of goods exports, at 16.9 billion U.S. dollars. U.S. - China trade war The trade war between the United States and China is an economic conflict between two of the world’s largest national economies. It started in 2018 when U.S. President Donald Trump started putting tariffs and trade barriers on China, with the intent to get China to conform to Trump’s wishes. President Trump claimed that China has unfair trade businesses. As a result of this trade war, it has caused a lot of tension between the U.S. and China. Nearly half of American companies impacted by the U.S.-China trade tariffs said that the trade war increased their cost of manufacturing. The healthcare product industry has suffered the most from the trade war in regards to reduced profits.
This data package includes the underlying data and files to replicate the calculations, charts, and tables presented in The US–China trade war and phase one agreement, PIIE Working Paper 21-2.
If you use the data, please cite as: Bown, Chad P. (2021). The US–China trade war and phase one agreement. PIIE Working Paper 21-2. Peterson Institute for International Economics.
This statistic shows the results of a survey conducted among American companies in China on the perceived impact on their businesses of the U.S.-China trade tariffs as of September 2018. During the survey period, 47.1 percent of the surveyed American companies in China responded that the combined U.S.-China trade tariffs increased their cost of manufacturing.
https://scoop.market.us/privacy-policyhttps://scoop.market.us/privacy-policy
The US tariff policies have significantly impacted the global trade management market, leading to both opportunities and challenges for businesses. In particular, tariffs on imported goods have increased the complexity of managing cross-border trade, requiring businesses to implement more sophisticated trade management solutions.
As companies face rising costs due to tariffs, the demand for trade management systems that help optimize customs compliance, minimize duties, and streamline logistics has surged. Furthermore, sectors such as manufacturing, retail, and transportation have felt the brunt of these tariffs, with industries directly impacted by increased trade barriers.
➤➤➤ Get More Insights about US Tariff Impact Analysis @ https://market.us/report/trade-management-market/free-sample/
For example, the retail sector has seen a rise in goods costs, ultimately affecting margins. The US tariff impact on sectors like manufacturing and retail is approximately 10-15% as they deal with higher raw material costs and inventory disruptions. Companies now look for more automation and integrated solutions to mitigate these costs and streamline operations.
The US tariffs have led to an increased cost of imports, pushing businesses to adopt more efficient trade management systems. As tariffs increase, businesses are forced to reevaluate their supply chain strategies, leading to higher operational costs. In the long term, this could prompt global shifts in trade flows.
US tariffs have disproportionately affected countries with high trade volumes with the US, especially China, Mexico, and Canada. As tariffs increase, businesses in these regions must adapt to higher costs and potential disruptions. This shift influences regional trade agreements and the movement of goods, altering global trade dynamics.
US tariffs have forced businesses to invest in advanced trade management technologies to mitigate the effects of increased import duties and logistical delays. Companies are now focusing on automation, compliance optimization, and cost-effective solutions to navigate the growing complexities of international trade. Small and medium-sized enterprises face considerable challenges.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Mattel adjusts its financial outlook and pricing strategy due to the impact of U.S.-China tariffs, aiming for cost savings and strategic repurchases.
This data package includes the underlying data and files to replicate the calculations, charts, and tables presented in The 2018 US-China Trade Conflict after 40 Years of Special Protection, PIIE Working paper 19-7.
If you use the data, please cite as: Bown, Chad P. (2019). The 2018 US-China Trade Conflict after 40 Years of Special Protection. PIIE Working paper 19-7. Peterson Institute for International Economics.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain
Graph and download economic data for U.S. Imports of Goods by Customs Basis from China (IMPCH) from Jan 1985 to Apr 2025 about imports, China, goods, and USA.
https://scoop.market.us/privacy-policyhttps://scoop.market.us/privacy-policy
U.S. tariffs on Chinese-made drone components have had a notable impact on the warehouse drones system market. The tariffs have raised the cost of critical drone parts, such as sensors and cameras, which are primarily sourced from China.
As a result, manufacturers in the U.S. have faced higher production costs, which could lead to increased prices for warehouse drones. This price increase may affect the affordability and adoption of drone systems in smaller warehouses or businesses with limited budgets.
To mitigate these impacts, companies are exploring alternative suppliers outside of China or increasing domestic production to reduce reliance on imported components. The U.S. tariff impact is particularly significant for helicopter-type drones and general warehouses, which rely heavily on imported technology. The tariffs are estimated to impact 20-25% of the market, especially in segments that depend on Chinese imports.
The U.S. tariffs are estimated to impact approximately 20-25% of the warehouse drone market, with a particular effect on helicopter-type drones and general warehouses, which heavily rely on imported components.
➤➤➤ Get More Detailed Insights about US Tariff Impact @ https://market.us/report/warehouse-drones-system-market/free-sample/
This data package includes the underlying data files to replicate the data, tables, and charts presented in Why Trump’s tariff proposals would harm working Americans, PIIE Policy Brief 24-1.
If you use the data, please cite as: Clausing, Kimberly, and Mary E. Lovely. 2024. Why Trump’s tariff proposals would harm working Americans. PIIE Policy Brief 24-1. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
With an export share of over 19 percent, the United States had been China's largest trade partner for years, until 2018, when the share fell significantly to 16.7 percent, after the U.S. president, Donald Trump, imposed a 200 percent tariff on goods from China. In 2024, the United States accounted for approximately 14.7 percent of Chinese exports, reaching their lowest level in the last decade.
https://scoop.market.us/privacy-policyhttps://scoop.market.us/privacy-policy
Tariffs are exerting a growing negative influence on the travel, tourism, and global supply chain sectors by driving up costs for both businesses and consumers. These added expenses often result in higher airfares, increased accommodation rates, and elevated overall travel budgets, making international tourism less attractive. For instance, airline operators facing higher import duties on fuel and aircraft components are forced to pass these costs onto passengers, which affects travel demand across borders.
The global tourism industry has demonstrated strong recovery momentum following the pandemic-era lockdowns, with demand for leisure and business travel rebounding across key markets. This upward trajectory is supported by increasing consumer confidence, greater digitalization in travel booking, and a renewed focus on experience-driven tourism.
Based on current growth patterns, global tourism spending is projected to surpass $2.9 trillion by 2035, marking a significant expansion from pre-pandemic levels. This long-term outlook is being bolstered by rising middle-class income in emerging markets, improved air connectivity, and supportive government policies aimed at rebuilding tourism ecosystems.
In the technology sector, companies like Apple have faced substantial financial impacts due to tariffs. Apple reported a $1.4 billion tariff hit, prompting the company to diversify its supply chain by shifting production from China to countries like India and Vietnam. This move aims to mitigate the effects of a 145% tariff on Chinese imports, which has significantly increased the cost of goods and affected pricing strategies.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Imports in China increased to 369.43 USD Billion in February from 230.79 USD Billion in December of 2024. This dataset provides - China Imports - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.
President Trump's proposals to impose universal tariffs as well as tariffs on Chinese, Canadian, and Mexican imports would considerably increase the average tariff rate. It's estimated that, if put into effect, the average tariff rate including dutiable imports would reach almost 18 percent, up from two percent in 2024. Tariff rates are higher when dutiable imports are included because they refer only to goods that are actually subject to tariffs, rather than all imports. This skews the average tariff rate upward because it excludes duty-free goods. Trump's proposal for a universal 10 percent tariff on all imports would impose a flat tax on all imports, rather than just dutiable goods. This would result in a sharp increase in the overall tariff burden because previously duty-free goods would be taxed.