28 datasets found
  1. d

    TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2019, nation, U.S., Military Installation National...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Jan 15, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2021). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2019, nation, U.S., Military Installation National Shapefile [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2019-nation-u-s-military-installation-national-shapefile
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 15, 2021
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The Census Bureau includes landmarks such as military installations in the MTDB for locating special features and to help enumerators during field operations. In 2012, the Census Bureau obtained the inventory and boundaries of most military installations from the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) for Air Force, Army, Marine, and Navy installations and from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for Coast Guard installations. The military installation boundaries in this release represent the updates the Census Bureau made in 2012 in collaboration with DoD.

  2. b

    Military Bases

    • geodata.bts.gov
    • datasets.ai
    • +3more
    Updated Jun 30, 2010
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Transportation: ArcGIS Online (2010). Military Bases [Dataset]. https://geodata.bts.gov/maps/military-bases
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 30, 2010
    Dataset authored and provided by
    U.S. Department of Transportation: ArcGIS Online
    Area covered
    Description

    The Military Bases dataset was last updated on October 23, 2024 and are defined by Fiscal Year 2023 data, from the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). The dataset depicts the authoritative locations of the most commonly known Department of Defense (DoD) sites, installations, ranges, and training areas world-wide. These sites encompass land which is federally owned or otherwise managed. This dataset was created from source data provided by the four Military Service Component headquarters and was compiled by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) Program within the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment. Only sites reported in the BSR or released in a map supplementing the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (FIRRMA) Real Estate Regulation (31 CFR Part 802) were considered for inclusion. This list does not necessarily represent a comprehensive collection of all Department of Defense facilities. For inventory purposes, installations are comprised of sites, where a site is defined as a specific geographic location of federally owned or managed land and is assigned to military installation. DoD installations are commonly referred to as a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, homeport facility for any ship, or other activity under the jurisdiction, custody, control of the DoD.

    While every attempt has been made to provide the best available data quality, this data set is intended for use at mapping scales between 1:50,000 and 1:3,000,000. For this reason, boundaries in this data set may not perfectly align with DoD site boundaries depicted in other federal data sources. Maps produced at a scale of 1:50,000 or smaller which otherwise comply with National Map Accuracy Standards, will remain compliant when this data is incorporated. Boundary data is most suitable for larger scale maps; point locations are better suited for mapping scales between 1:250,000 and 1:3,000,000.

    If a site is part of a Joint Base (effective/designated on 1 October, 2010) as established under the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure process, it is attributed with the name of the Joint Base. All sites comprising a Joint Base are also attributed to the responsible DoD Component, which is not necessarily the pre-2005 Component responsible for the site.

  3. a

    Military Bases

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • mapdirect-fdep.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Jan 1, 2009
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Florida Department of Environmental Protection (2009). Military Bases [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/FDEP::military-bases
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 1, 2009
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Florida Department of Environmental Protection
    Area covered
    Description

    The United States Military Installations database contains the boundaries and location information for important military installations in the United States and Puerto Rico. This layer is a subset of the nationwide database containing military installations in the State of Florida. Please contact GIS.Librarian@floridadep.gov for more information.

  4. Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas (MIRTA)

    • geospatial-usace.opendata.arcgis.com
    • hub.arcgis.com
    • +2more
    Updated Oct 8, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    usace_crrel_als (2020). Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas (MIRTA) [Dataset]. https://geospatial-usace.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/fc0f38c5a19a46dbacd92f2fb823ef8c
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 8, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    United States Army Corps of Engineershttp://www.usace.army.mil/
    Authors
    usace_crrel_als
    Area covered
    Description

    The dataset depicts the authoritative locations of the most commonly known Department of Defense (DoD) sites, installations, ranges, and training areas in the United States and Territories. These sites encompass land which is federally owned or otherwise managed. This dataset was created from source data provided by the four Military Service Component headquarters and was compiled by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) Program within the Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment, Business Enterprise Integration Directorate. Sites were selected from the 2009 Base Structure Report (BSR), a summary of the DoD Real Property Inventory. This list does not necessarily represent a comprehensive collection of all Department of Defense facilities, and only those in the fifty United States and US Territories were considered for inclusion. For inventory purposes, installations are comprised of sites, where a site is defined as a specific geographic location of federally owned or managed land and is assigned to military installation. DoD installations are commonly referred to as a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, homeport facility for any ship, or other activity under the jurisdiction, custody, control of the DoD.

  5. Military Installations, Ranges, and Training Areas

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.globalchange.gov
    • +3more
    Updated Feb 24, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Department of Defense (2021). Military Installations, Ranges, and Training Areas [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/military-installations-ranges-and-training-areas
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 24, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    United States Department of Defensehttp://www.defense.gov/
    Description

    This dataset, released by DoD, contains geographic information for major installations, ranges, and training areas in the United States and its territories. This release integrates site information about DoD installations, training ranges, and land assets in a format which can be immediately put to work in commercial geospatial information systems. Homeland Security/Homeland Defense, law enforcement, and readiness planners will benefit from immediate access to DoD site location data during emergencies. Land use planning and renewable energy planning will also benefit from use of this data. Users are advised that the point and boundary location datasets are intended for planning purposes only, and do not represent the legal or surveyed land parcel boundaries.

  6. a

    Military Bases

    • data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Jun 20, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Transportation ArcGIS Online (2019). Military Bases [Dataset]. https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/d163fcde26de4d21aa06aa141ce3a662
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 20, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    U.S. Department of Transportation ArcGIS Online
    Area covered
    Description

    The Military Installations dataset is as of January 1, 2021, and is from the Defense Installations Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) Program in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (OASD) for Sustainment and part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT/Bureau of Transportation Statistics’ (BTS’) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). This geospatial dataset contains the authoritative point locations and (where available) boundaries of Department of Defense sites, commonly referred to as installations, ranges, training areas, bases, forts, camps, armories, centers, etc. These installations are, in many cases, comprised of a number of subordinate sites. This list does not necessarily represent a comprehensive collection of all Department of Defense facilities, and only those reported in the Fiscal Year 2018 BSR were considered for inclusion. Points are placed either at or near the center of each site and do not reflect any particular landmark. Boundaries encompass federally owned or otherwise managed lands, as defined in the BSR. The point and boundary location datasets are intended for planning purposes only, and do not necessarily represent the legal or surveyed land parcel boundaries. Please use the accompanying metadata to validate whether this dataset is suitable for your intended use.

  7. W

    PSAP 911 Service Area Boundaries

    • wifire-data.sdsc.edu
    • hub.arcgis.com
    csv, esri rest +4
    Updated May 31, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CA Governor's Office of Emergency Services (2019). PSAP 911 Service Area Boundaries [Dataset]. https://wifire-data.sdsc.edu/dataset/psap-911-service-area-boundaries
    Explore at:
    csv, geojson, kml, esri rest, zip, htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    CA Governor's Office of Emergency Services
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    911 Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) service area boundaries in the United States According to the National Emergency Number Association (NENA), a Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) is a facility equipped and staffed to receive 9-1-1 calls. The service area is the geographic area within which a 911 call placed using a landline is answered at the associated PSAP. This dataset only includes primary PSAPs. Secondary PSAPs, backup PSAPs, and wireless PSAPs have been excluded from this dataset. Primary PSAPs receive calls directly, whereas secondary PSAPs receive calls that have been transferred by a primary PSAP. Backup PSAPs provide service in cases where another PSAP is inoperable. Most military bases have their own emergency telephone systems. To connect to such a system from within a military base, it may be necessary to dial a number other than 9 1 1. Due to the sensitive nature of military installations, TGS did not actively research these systems. If civilian authorities in surrounding areas volunteered information about these systems, or if adding a military PSAP was necessary to fill a hole in civilian provided data, TGS included it in this dataset. Otherwise, military installations are depicted as being covered by one or more adjoining civilian emergency telephone systems. In some cases, areas are covered by more than one PSAP boundary. In these cases, any of the applicable PSAPs may take a 911 call. Where a specific call is routed may depend on how busy the applicable PSAPs are (i.e., load balancing), operational status (i.e., redundancy), or time of day / day of week. If an area does not have 911 service, TGS included that area in the dataset along with the address and phone number of their dispatch center. These are areas where someone must dial a 7 or 10 digit number to get emergency services. These records can be identified by a "Y" in the [NON911EMNO] field. This indicates that dialing 911 inside one of these areas does not connect one with emergency services. This dataset was constructed by gathering information about PSAPs from state level officials. In some cases, this was geospatial information; in other cases, it was tabular. This information was supplemented with a list of PSAPs from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Each PSAP was researched to verify its tabular information. In cases where the source data was not geospatial, each PSAP was researched to determine its service area in terms of existing boundaries (e.g., city and county boundaries). In some cases, existing boundaries had to be modified to reflect coverage areas (e.g., "entire county north of Country Road 30"). However, there may be cases where minor deviations from existing boundaries are not reflected in this dataset, such as the case where a particular PSAPs coverage area includes an entire county plus the homes and businesses along a road which is partly in another county. At the request of NGA, text fields in this dataset have been set to all upper case to facilitate consistent database engine search results. At the request of NGA, all diacritics (e.g., the German umlaut or the Spanish tilde) have been replaced with their closest equivalent English character to facilitate use with database systems that may not support diacritics.


    Homeland Security Use Cases: Use cases describe how the data may be used and help to define and clarify requirements. 1) A disaster has struck, or is predicted for, a locality. The PSAP that may be affected must be identified and verified to be operational. 2) In the event that the local PSAP is inoperable, adjacent PSAP locations could be identified and utilized.

  8. W

    Emergency Medical Service Stations

    • wifire-data.sdsc.edu
    • gis-calema.opendata.arcgis.com
    csv, esri rest +4
    Updated May 22, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CA Governor's Office of Emergency Services (2019). Emergency Medical Service Stations [Dataset]. https://wifire-data.sdsc.edu/dataset/emergency-medical-service-stations
    Explore at:
    esri rest, kml, zip, csv, geojson, htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 22, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    CA Governor's Office of Emergency Services
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description
    The dataset represents Emergency Medical Services (EMS) locations in the United States and its territories. EMS Stations are part of the Fire Stations / EMS Stations HSIP Freedom sub-layer, which in turn is part of the Emergency Services and Continuity of Government Sector, which is itself a part of the Critical Infrastructure Category. The EMS stations dataset consists of any location where emergency medical service (EMS) personnel are stationed or based out of, or where equipment that such personnel use in carrying out their jobs is stored for ready use. Ambulance services are included even if they only provide transportation services, but not if they are located at, and operated by, a hospital. If an independent ambulance service or EMS provider happens to be collocated with a hospital, it will be included in this dataset. The dataset includes both private and governmental entities. A concerted effort was made to include all emergency medical service locations in the United States and its territories. This dataset is comprised completely of license free data. Records with "-DOD" appended to the end of the [NAME] value are located on a military base, as defined by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) military installations and military range boundaries. At the request of NGA, text fields in this dataset have been set to all upper case to facilitate consistent database engine search results. At the request of NGA, all diacritics (e.g., the German umlaut or the Spanish tilde) have been replaced with their closest equivalent English character to facilitate use with database systems that may not support diacritics. The currentness of this dataset is indicated by the [CONTDATE] field. Based upon this field, the oldest record dates from 12/29/2004 and the newest record dates from 01/11/2010.

    This dataset represents the EMS stations of any location where emergency medical service (EMS) personnel are stationed or based out of, or where equipment that such personnel use in carrying out their jobs is stored for ready use. Homeland Security Use Cases: Use cases describe how the data may be used and help to define and clarify requirements. 1. An assessment of whether or not the total emergency medical services capability in a given area is adequate. 2. A list of resources to draw upon by surrounding areas when local resources have temporarily been overwhelmed by a disaster - route analysis can determine those entities that are able to respond the quickest. 3. A resource for Emergency Management planning purposes. 4. A resource for catastrophe response to aid in the retrieval of equipment by outside responders in order to deal with the disaster. 5. A resource for situational awareness planning and response for Federal Government events.


  9. Fire Stations

    • wifire-data.sdsc.edu
    • hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    csv, esri rest +4
    Updated Apr 7, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CA Governor's Office of Emergency Services (2020). Fire Stations [Dataset]. https://wifire-data.sdsc.edu/dataset/fire-stations
    Explore at:
    esri rest, kml, html, csv, zip, geojsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 7, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    California Governor's Office of Emergency Services
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Fire Stations in the United States Any location where fire fighters are stationed or based out of, or where equipment that such personnel use in carrying out their jobs is stored for ready use. Fire Departments not having a permanent location are included, in which case their location has been depicted at the city/town hall or at the center of their service area if a city/town hall does not exist. This dataset includes those locations primarily engaged in forest or grasslands fire fighting, including fire lookout towers if the towers are in current use for fire protection purposes. This dataset includes both private and governmental entities. Fire fighting training academies are also included. TGS has made a concerted effort to include all fire stations in the United States and its territories. This dataset is comprised completely of license free data. The HSIP Freedom Fire Station dataset and the HSIP Freedom EMS dataset were merged into one working file. TGS processed as one file and then separated for delivery purposes. Please see the process description for the breakdown of how the records were merged. Records with "-DOD" appended to the end of the [NAME] value are located on a military base, as defined by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) military installations and military range boundaries. At the request of NGA, text fields in this dataset have been set to all upper case to facilitate consistent database engine search results. At the request of NGA, all diacritics (e.g., the German umlaut or the Spanish tilde) have been replaced with their closest equivalent English character to facilitate use with database systems that may not support diacritics. The currentness of this dataset is indicated by the [CONTDATE] field. Based upon this field, the oldest record dates from 01/03/2005 and the newest record dates from 01/11/2010.


    Homeland Security Use Cases: Use cases describe how the data may be used and help to define and clarify requirements. 1. An assessment of whether or not the total fire fighting capability in a given area is adequate. 2. A list of resources to draw upon by surrounding areas when local resources have temporarily been overwhelmed by a disaster - route analysis can determine those entities that are able to respond the quickest. 3. A resource for Emergency Management planning purposes. 4. A resource for catastrophe response to aid in the retrieval of equipment by outside responders in order to deal with the disaster. 5. A resource for situational awareness planning and response for Federal Government events.

  10. Texas Military Boundaries

    • gis-txdot.opendata.arcgis.com
    • geoportal-mpo.opendata.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Aug 8, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Texas Department of Transportation (2016). Texas Military Boundaries [Dataset]. https://gis-txdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/texas-military-boundaries
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 8, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Texas Department of Transportationhttp://txdot.gov/
    Area covered
    Description

    This layer is intended to be used for medium to small scale TxDOT cartographic products.Update Frequency: As NeededSource: US MilitarySecurity Level: PublicOwned by TxDOT: FalseRelated LinksData Dictionary PDF [Generated 2025/03/17]

  11. Local Emergency Operations Centers (EOC)

    • wifire-data.sdsc.edu
    • hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    csv, esri rest +4
    Updated May 22, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CA Governor's Office of Emergency Services (2019). Local Emergency Operations Centers (EOC) [Dataset]. https://wifire-data.sdsc.edu/dataset/local-emergency-operations-centers-eoc
    Explore at:
    geojson, csv, esri rest, kml, html, zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 22, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    California Governor's Office of Emergency Services
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    HSIP Local Emergency Operations Centers in the United States "The physical location at which the coordination of information and resources to support domestic incident management activities normally takes place. An Emergency Operations Center may be a temporary facility or may be located in a more central or permanently established facility, perhaps at a higher level of organization within a jurisdiction. Emergency Operations Centers may be organized by major functional disciplines (e.g., fire, law enforcement, and medical services), by jurisdiction (e.g., Federal, State, regional, county, city, tribal), or some combination thereof." (Excerpted from the National Incident Management System) The GFI source for this layer contains State and Federal Emergency Operations Centers in addition to local Emergency Operations Centers. This dataset contains these features as well. In cases where an Emergency Operations Center has a mobile unit, TechniGraphics captured the location of the mobile unit as a separate record. This record represents where the mobile unit is stored. If this location could not be verified, a point was placed in the approximate center of the Emergency Operations Centers service area. Effort was made by TechniGraphics to verify whether or not each Emergency Operations Center has a generator on-site and whether or not the Emergency Operations Center is located in a basement. This information is indicated by the values in the [GENERATOR] and [BASEMENT] fields respectively. In cases where more than one record existed for a geographical area (e.g., county, city), TechniGraphics verified whether or not one of the records represented an alternate location. This was indicated by appending "-ALTERNATE" to the value in the [NAME] field. Some Emergency Operations Centers are located at private residences. The [TYPE] field was manually evaluated during the delivery process to compare the records in which the [NAME] field contained "-ALTERNATE". In cases where these values contradicted information that was verified by TechniGraphics (e.g. [NAME] contained "-ALTERNATE" and [TYPE] = "PRIMARY"), the value in the [TYPE] field was changed to match the type indicated by the [NAME] of the verified record. TechniGraphics did not change values in this field if the type was not verified. Records with "-DOD" appended to the end of the [NAME] value are located on a military base, as defined by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) military installations and military range boundaries. "#" and "*" characters were automatically removed from standard HSIP fields that TechniGraphics populated. Double spaces were replaced by single spaces in these same fields. At the request of NGA, text fields in this dataset have been set to all upper case to facilitate consistent database engine search results. At the request of NGA, all diacritics (e.g., the German umlaut or the Spanish tilde) have been replaced with their closest equivalent English character to facilitate use with database systems that may not support diacritics. The currentness of this dataset is indicated by the [CONTDATE] field. Based upon this attribute, the oldest record dates from 08/28/2009 and the newest record dates from 11/18/2009.


    Homeland Security Use Cases: Use cases describe how the data may be used and help to define and clarify requirements. 1. A resource for preparing, mitigating, responding to and recovering from an emergency. 2. A list of resources to draw upon by surrounding areas when local resources have temporarily been overwhelmed by a disaster. 3. A resource for Emergency Management planning purposes. 4. A resource for catastrophe response to aid in the retrieval of equipment by outside responders in order to deal with the disaster. 5. A resource for situational awareness planning and response for Federal Government events.

  12. a

    2019 Annual Land Use (Download in file-GDB format only)

    • engage-socal-pilot-scag-rdp.hub.arcgis.com
    • hub.scag.ca.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Feb 10, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    rdpgisadmin (2022). 2019 Annual Land Use (Download in file-GDB format only) [Dataset]. https://engage-socal-pilot-scag-rdp.hub.arcgis.com/items/ea9fda878c1947d2afac5142fd5cb658
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 10, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    rdpgisadmin
    License

    MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    "Due to the size of this dataset, both Shapefile and Spreadsheet download options will not work as expected. The File Geodatabase is an alternative option for this data download"This is SCAG's 2019 Annual Land Use (ALU v. 2019.1) at the parcel-level, updated as of February 2021. This dataset has been modified to include additional attributes in order to feed SCAG's Housing Element Parcel Tool (HELPR), version 2.0. The dataset will be further reviewed and updated as additional information is released. Please refer to the tables below for data dictionary and SCAG’s land use classification.Field NameData TypeField DescriptionPID19Text2019 SCAG’s parcel unique IDAPN19Text2019 Assessor’s parcel numberCOUNTYTextCounty name (based on 2016 county boundary)COUNTY_IDDoubleCounty FIPS code (based on 2016 county boundary)CITYTextCity name (based on 2016 city boundary)CITY_IDDoubleCity FIPS code (based on 2016 city boundary)MULTIPARTShort IntegerMultipart feature (the number of multiple polygons; '1' = singlepart feature)STACKLong IntegerDuplicate geometry (the number of duplicate polygons; '0' = no duplicate polygons)ACRESDoubleParcel area (in acreage)GEOID20Text2020 Census Block Group GEOIDSLOPEShort IntegerSlope information1APN_DUPLong IntegerDuplicate APN (the number of multiple tax roll property records; '0' = no duplicate APN)IL_RATIODoubleRatio of improvement assessed value to land assessed valueLU19Text2019 existing land useLU19_SRCTextSource of 2019 existing land use2SCAGUID16Text2016 SCAG’s parcel unique IDAPNText2016 Assessor’s parcel numberCITY_GP_COText2016 Jurisdiction’s general plan land use designationSCAG_GP_COText2016 SCAG general plan land use codeSP_INDEXShort IntegerSpecific plan index ('0' = outside specific plan area; '1' = inside specific plan area)CITY_SP_COText2016 Jurisdiction’s specific plan land use designationSCAG_SP_COText2016 SCAG specific plan land use codeCITY_ZN_COText2016 Jurisdiction’s zoning codeSCAG_ZN_COText2016 SCAG zoning codeLU16Text2016 existing land useYEARLong IntegerDataset yearPUB_OWNShort IntegerPublic-owned land index ('1' = owned by public agency)PUB_NAMETextName of public agencyPUB_TYPETextType of public agency3BF_SQFTDoubleBuilding footprint area (in square feet)4BSF_NAMETextName of brownfield/superfund site5BSF_TYPETextType of brownfield/superfund site5FIREShort IntegerParcel intersects CalFire Very High Hazard Local Responsibility Areas or State Responsibility Areas (November 2020 version) (CalFIRE)SEARISE36Short IntegerParcel intersects with USGS Coastal Storm Modeling System (CoSMos)1 Meter Sea Level Rise inundation areas for Southern California (v3.0, Phase 2; 2018)SEARISE72Short IntegerParcel intersects with USGS Coastal Storm Modeling System (CoSMos)2 Meter Sea Level Rise inundation areas for Southern California (v3.0, Phase 2; 2018)FLOODShort IntegerParcel intersects with a FEMA 100 Year Flood Plain data from the Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM), obtained from Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in August 10, 2017EQUAKEShort IntegerParcel intersects with an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (California Geological Survey; 2018)LIQUAFAShort IntegerParcel intersects with a Liquefaction Susceptibility Zone (California Geological Survey; 2016)LANDSLIDEShort IntegerParcel intersects with a Landslide Hazard Zone (California Geological Survey; 2016)CPADShort IntegerParcel intersects with a protected area from the California Protected Areas Database(CPAD) – www.calands.org (accessed April 2021)RIPARIANShort IntegerParcel centroid falls within Active River Areas(2010)or parcel intersects with a Wetland Area in the National Wetland Inventory(Version 2)WILDLIFEShort IntegerParcel intersects with wildlife habitat (US Fish & Wildlife ServiceCritical Habitat, Southern California Missing Linkages, Natural Lands & Habitat Corridors from Connect SoCal, CEHC Essential Connectivity Areas,Critical Coastal Habitats)CNDDBShort IntegerThe California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB)includes the status and locations of rare plants and animals in California. Parcels that overlap locations of rare plants and animals in California from the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB)have a greater likelihood of encountering special status plants and animals on the property, potentially leading to further legal requirements to allow development (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). Data accessed in October 2020.HCPRAShort IntegerParcel intersects Natural Community & Habitat Conservation Plans Reserve Designs from the Western Riverside MHSCP, Coachella Valley MHSCP, and the Orange County Central Coastal NCCP/HCP, as accessed in October 2020WETLANDShort IntegerParcel intersects a wetland or deepwater habitat as defined by the US Fish & Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory, Version 2.UAZShort IntegerParcel centroid lies within a Caltrans Adjusted Urbanized AreasUNBUILT_SFDoubleDifference between parcel area and building footprint area expressed in square feet.6GRCRY_1MIShort IntegerThe number of grocery stores within a 1-mile drive7HEALTH_1MIShort IntegerThe number of healthcare facilities within a 1-mile drive7OPENSP_1MIShort IntegerQuantity of open space (roughly corresponding to city blocks’ worth) within a 1-mile drive7TCAC_2021TextThe opportunity level based on the 2021 CA HCD/TCAC opportunity scores.HQTA45Short IntegerField takes a value of 1 if parcel centroid lies within a 2045 High-Quality Transit Area (HQTA)JOB_CTRShort IntegerField takes a value of 1 if parcel centroid lies within a job centerNMAShort IntegerField takes a value of 1 if parcel centroid lies within a neighborhood mobility area.ABS_CONSTRShort IntegerField takes a value of 1 if parcel centroid lies within an absolute constraint area. See the Sustainable Communities Strategy Technical Reportfor details.VAR_CONSTRShort IntegerField takes a value of 1 if parcel centroid lies within a variable constraint area. See the Sustainable Communities Strategy Technical Reportfor details.EJAShort IntegerField takes a value of 1 if parcel centroid lies within an Environmental Justice Area. See the Environmental Justice Technical Reportfor details.SB535Short IntegerField takes a value of 1 if parcel centroid lies within an SB535 Disadvantaged Community area. See the Environmental Justice Technical Reportfor details.COCShort IntegerField takes a value of 1 if parcel centroid lies within a Community of Concern See the Environmental Justice Technical Reportfor details.STATEShort IntegerThis field is a rudimentary estimate of which parcels have adequate physical space to accommodate a typical detached Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)8.SBShort IntegerIndex of ADU eligibility according to the setback reduction policy scenario (from 4 to 2 feet) (1 = ADU eligible parcel, Null = Not ADU eligible parcel)SMShort IntegerIndex of ADU eligibility according to the small ADU policy scenario (from 800 to 600 square feet ADU) (1 = ADU eligible parcel, Null = Not ADU eligible parcel)PKShort IntegerIndex of ADU eligibility according to parking space exemption (200 square feet) policy scenario (1 = ADU eligible parcel, Null = Not ADU eligible parcel)SB_SMShort IntegerIndex of ADU eligibility according to both the setback reduction and small ADU policy scenarios (1 = ADU eligible parcel, Null = Not ADU eligible parcel)SB_PKShort IntegerIndex of ADU eligibility according to both the setback reduction and parking space exemption scenarios (1 = ADU eligible parcel, Null = Not ADU eligible parcel)SM_PKShort IntegerIndex of ADU eligibility according to both the small ADU policy and parking space exemption scenarios (1 = ADU eligible parcel, Null = Not ADU eligible parcel)SB_SM_PKShort IntegerIndex of ADU eligibility according to the setback reduction, small ADU, and parking space exemption scenarios (1 = ADU eligible parcel, Null = Not ADU eligible parcel)1. Slope: '0' - 0~4 percent; '5' - 5~9 percent; '10' - 10~14 percent; '15' = 15~19 percent; '20' - 20~24 percent; '25' = 25 percent or greater.2. Source of 2019 existing land use: SCAG_REF- SCAG's regional geospatial datasets;ASSESSOR- Assessor's 2019 tax roll records; CPAD- California Protected Areas Database (version 2020a; accessed in September 2020); CSCD- California School Campus Database (version 2018; accessed in September 2020); FMMP- Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program's Important Farmland GIS data (accessed in September 2020); MIRTA- U.S. Department of Defense's Military Installations, Ranges, and Training Areas GIS data (accessed in September 2020)3. Type of public agency includes federal, state, county, city, special district, school district, college/university, military.4. Based on 2019 building footprint data obtained from BuildingFootprintUSA (except that 2014 building footprint data was used for Imperial County). Please note that 2019 building footprint data does not cover the entire SCAG region (overlapped with 83% of parcels in the SCAG Region).5. Includes brownfield/superfund site whose address information are matched by SCAG rooftop address locator. Brownfield data was obtained from EPA's Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) database, Cleanups in my community (CIMC), DTSC brownfield Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). Superfund site data was obtained from EPA's Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) database.6. Parcels with a zero value for building footprint area are marked as NULL to indicate this field is not reliable.7. These values are intended as a rudimentary indicator of accessibility developed by SCAG using 2016 InfoUSA business establishment data and 2017 California Protected Areas data. See documentation for details.8. A detailed study conducted by Cal Poly Pomona (CPP) and available hereconducted an extensive review of state and local requirements and development trends for ADUs in the SCAG region and developed a baseline set of assumptions for estimating how many of a jurisdiction’s parcels

  13. Military Installation: Camp Swift Fire Experiment 2014

    • usfs.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Feb 9, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Forest Service (2018). Military Installation: Camp Swift Fire Experiment 2014 [Dataset]. https://usfs.hub.arcgis.com/content/2b954b1258d547aa91373e0f44dedc72
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 9, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Servicehttp://fs.fed.us/
    Authors
    U.S. Forest Service
    License

    MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation.

    The Census Bureau includes landmarks such as military installations in the MTDB for locating special features and to help enumerators during field operations. In 2012, the Census Bureau obtained the inventory and boundaries of most military installations from the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) for Air Force, Army, Marine, and Navy installations and from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for Coast Guard installations.

    The military installation boundaries in this release represent the updates the Census Bureau made in 2012 in collaboration with DoD.Full details on the Camp Swift Fire Experiment 2014 can be accessed through the "Camp Swift Fire Experiment 2014: Integrated Data Quality Assessment" story map. The full set of published data is contained on the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Research Data Archive.

  14. Administrative Boundaries of National Park System Units

    • gisnation-sdi.hub.arcgis.com
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Sep 26, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Esri U.S. Federal Datasets (2023). Administrative Boundaries of National Park System Units [Dataset]. https://gisnation-sdi.hub.arcgis.com/maps/e62a2420170b4452b4a334db92130220
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 26, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Esrihttp://esri.com/
    Authors
    Esri U.S. Federal Datasets
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    Administrative Boundaries of National Park System UnitsThis National Geospatial Data Asset (NGDA) dataset, shared as a National Park Service (NPS) feature layer, displays National Park Service tract and boundary data that was created by the Land Resources Division. Per NPS, "Boundary polygons have been created by the Lands Resources Program according to the procedures defined in the Lands Acquisition Procedures Manual. Boundaries were created with data provided by Parks, Region, and Program offices. This data includes but is not limited to deeds, legal descriptions, legislation, survey plats, change orders, segment maps, and the ownership databases of the Land Resources Program."Frederick Douglass and National Capital ParksData currency: current Federal service (NPS Land Resources Division Boundary and Tract Data Service)NGDAID: 16 (Administrative Boundaries of National Park System Units - National Geospatial Data Asset (NGDA) NPS National Parks Dataset)For more information: Administrative Boundaries of National Park System Units - National Geospatial Data Asset (NGDA) NPS National Parks DatasetFor feedback please contact: Esri_US_Federal_Data@esri.comNGDA Theme CommunityThis data set is part of the NGDA Cadastre Theme Community. Per the Federal Geospatial Data Committee (FGDC), Cadastre is defined as the "past, current, and future rights and interests in real property including the spatial information necessary to describe geographic extents. Rights and interests are benefits or enjoyment in real property that can be conveyed, transferred, or otherwise allocated to another for economic remuneration. Rights and interests are recorded in land record documents. The spatial information necessary to describe geographic extents includes surveys and legal description frameworks such as the Public Land Survey System, as well as parcel-by-parcel surveys and descriptions. Does not include federal government or military facilities."For other NGDA Content: Esri Federal Datasets

  15. d

    Census Tracts in 2020

    • opendata.dc.gov
    • opdatahub.dc.gov
    • +4more
    Updated Aug 27, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Washington, DC (2021). Census Tracts in 2020 [Dataset]. https://opendata.dc.gov/datasets/DCGIS::census-tracts-in-2020/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 27, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Washington, DC
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    Census Tracts from 2020. The TIGER/Line shapefiles are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Census tracts are small, relatively permanent statistical subdivisions of a county or equivalent entity, and were defined by local participants as part of the 2020 Census Participant Statistical Areas Program. The Census Bureau delineated the census tracts in situations where no local participant existed or where all the potential participants declined to participate. The primary purpose of census tracts is to provide a stable set of geographic units for the presentation of census data and comparison back to previous decennial censuses. Census tracts generally have a population size between 1,200 and 8,000 people, with an optimum size of 4,000 people. When first delineated, census tracts were designed to be homogeneous with respect to population characteristics, economic status, and living conditions. The spatial size of census tracts varies widely depending on the density of settlement. Physical changes in street patterns caused by highway construction, new development, and so forth, may require boundary revisions. In addition, census tracts occasionally are split due to population growth, or combined as a result of substantial population decline. Census tract boundaries generally follow visible and identifiable features. They may follow legal boundaries such as minor civil division (MCD) or incorporated place boundaries in some States and situations to allow for census tract-to-governmental unit relationships where the governmental boundaries tend to remain unchanged between censuses. State and county boundaries always are census tract boundaries in the standard census geographic hierarchy. In a few rare instances, a census tract may consist of noncontiguous areas. These noncontiguous areas may occur where the census tracts are coextensive with all or parts of legal entities that are themselves noncontiguous. For the 2020 Census, the census tract code range of 9400 through 9499 was enforced for census tracts that include a majority American Indian population according to Census 2010 data and/or their area was primarily covered by federally recognized American Indian reservations and/or off-reservation trust lands; the code range 9800 through 9899 was enforced for those census tracts that contained little or no population and represented a relatively large special land use area such as a National Park, military installation, or a business/industrial park; and the code range 9900 through 9998 was enforced for those census tracts that contained only water area.

  16. Proclaimed Forest Boundaries

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • gisforagriculture-usdaocio.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jun 18, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Esri U.S. Federal Datasets (2021). Proclaimed Forest Boundaries [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/fedmaps::proclaimed-forest-boundaries-1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 18, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Esrihttp://esri.com/
    Authors
    Esri U.S. Federal Datasets
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    Proclaimed Forest BoundariesThis feature layer, utilizing National Geospatial Data Asset (NGDA) data from the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), displays proclaimed forest boundaries in the United States. Per the USFS, the USFS National Forests Dataset (U.S. Forest Service Proclaimed Forests) "is a depiction of the boundaries encompassing the National Forest System (NFS) lands within the original proclaimed National Forests, along with subsequent Executive Orders, Proclamations, Public Laws, Public Land Orders, Secretary of Agriculture Orders, and Secretary of Interior Orders creating modifications thereto, along with lands added to the NFS which have taken on the status of 'reserved from the public domain' under the General Exchange Act. The following area types are included: National Forest, Experimental Area, Experimental Forest, Experimental Range, Land Utilization Project, National Grassland, Purchase Unit, and Special Management Area.”Ozark National Forest, Ouachita National Forest & Holly Springs National ForestData currency: This cached Esri federal service is checked weekly for updates from its enterprise federal source (Original Proclaimed National Forests) and will support mapping, analysis, data exports and OGC API – Feature access.NGDAID: 13 (FS National Forest Dataset (US Forest Service Proclaimed Forests))OGC API Features Link: (Proclaimed Forest Boundaries - OGC Features) copy this link to embed it in OGC Compliant viewersFor more information: FS National Forests Dataset (US Forest Service Proclaimed Forests)Support documentation: FS National Forests Dataset (US Forest Service Proclaimed Forests), MetadataFor feedback please contact: Esri_US_Federal_Data@esri.comNGDA Data SetThis data set is part of the NGDA Cadastre Theme Community. Per the Federal Geospatial Data Committee (FGDC), Cadastre is defined as the "past, current, and future rights and interests in real property including the spatial information necessary to describe geographic extents. Rights and interests are benefits or enjoyment in real property that can be conveyed, transferred, or otherwise allocated to another for economic remuneration. Rights and interests are recorded in land record documents. The spatial information necessary to describe geographic extents includes surveys and legal description frameworks such as the Public Land Survey System, as well as parcel-by-parcel surveys and descriptions. Does not include federal government or military facilities."For other NGDA Content: Esri Federal Datasets

  17. a

    Alabama Incorporated Cities Boundaries

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • alic-algeohub.hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 16, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Alabama GeoHub (2020). Alabama Incorporated Cities Boundaries [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/48fdf5a4e1b640e8bd2bcfdddd43b182
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 16, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Alabama GeoHub
    Area covered
    Description

    Alabama incorporated cities based on US Census Bureau cities boundaries and ADOR tax rates. Federal (military installations) and tribal lands have been removed. Current as of 11/22/2022 for PSC and TNCs.

  18. a

    Thurston Government Lands

    • arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com
    • gisdata-thurston.opendata.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Nov 30, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Thurston GeoData Center, WA, USA (2017). Thurston Government Lands [Dataset]. https://arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/thurston::thurston-government-lands/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 30, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Thurston GeoData Center, WA, USA
    Area covered
    Description

    This layer is used as a general reference of boundaries associated with State and National Forest lands, Military installations, and Tribal lands in Thurston, and surrounding, counties. Every effort is made to update the boundaries as error's or changes occur however all changes are verified with a State or Federal entity before implementation. Military installations – All land associated with Joint Base Lewis McChord. Other properties owned by the Department of Defense, or similar entities, are not included in this layer.
    State Forest Lands – All trust lands, managed by Washington State Department of Natural Resources, associated with Capitol State Forest. These encompass the approximately 100,000 acres of land in both Thurston and Grays Harbor counties. Other properties, owned by DNR, in Thurston County are not included in this layer. For Parks data (City, County, State, and Federal) and information see the Thurston County Parks layer.
    National Forest Lands – National Forest lands, managed by the US Forest Service. Reservations – All lands associated with the Tribal Reservations of the Nisqually or Chehalis Tribes. This layer is updated using information from the US Federal Government as the authoritative source. This layer does not include lands in trust or lands falling outside the US recognized boundary.

  19. Administrative Boundaries of National Park System Units - OGC Features

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • gisnation-sdi.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 23, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Esri U.S. Federal Datasets (2023). Administrative Boundaries of National Park System Units - OGC Features [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/content/cc6106f20aa641398a74185947c74005
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 23, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Esrihttp://esri.com/
    Authors
    Esri U.S. Federal Datasets
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    Administrative Boundaries of National Park System UnitsThis feature layer, utilizing National Geospatial Data Asset (NGDA) data from the National Park Service, displays agency unit boundaries.Data currency: This cached Esri federal service is checked weekly for updates from its enterprise federal source (NPS Land Resources Division Boundary and Tract Data Service) and will support mapping, analysis, data exports and OGC API – Feature access.Data.gov: Administrative Boundaries of National Park System Units - National Geospatial Data Asset (NGDA) NPS National Parks DatasetGeoplatform: Not availableFor more information: For feedback please contact: Esri_US_Federal_Data@esri.comNGDA Data SetThis data set is part of the NGDA Cadastre Theme Community. Per the Federal Geospatial Data Committee (FGDC), Cadastre is defined as the "past, current, and future rights and interests in real property including the spatial information necessary to describe geographic extents. Rights and interests are benefits or enjoyment in real property that can be conveyed, transferred, or otherwise allocated to another for economic remuneration. Rights and interests are recorded in land record documents. The spatial information necessary to describe geographic extents includes surveys and legal description frameworks such as the Public Land Survey System, as well as parcel-by-parcel surveys and descriptions. Does not include federal government or military facilities."For other NGDA Content: Esri Federal Datasets

  20. a

    Jurisdiction in Santa Monica Mountains

    • santa-monica-mountains-defensible-space-uscssi.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Apr 18, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Spatial Sciences Institute (2022). Jurisdiction in Santa Monica Mountains [Dataset]. https://santa-monica-mountains-defensible-space-uscssi.hub.arcgis.com/items/a7b06b425cf44f899ddc1f9fc976b5cb
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 18, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Spatial Sciences Institute
    License

    MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    This is SCAG's 2019 Annual Land Use (ALU v. 2019.1) at the parcel-level, updated as of February 2021. This dataset has been modified to include additional attributes in order to feed SCAG's Housing Element Parcel Tool (HELPR), version 2.0. The dataset will be further reviewed and updated as additional information is released. Please refer to the tables below for data dictionary and SCAG’s land use classification. Field Name Data TypeField DescriptionPID19Text2019 SCAG’s parcel unique IDAPN19Text2019 Assessor’s parcel numberCOUNTYTextCounty name (based on 2016 county boundary)COUNTY_IDDoubleCounty FIPS code (based on 2016 county boundary)CITYTextCity name (based on 2016 city boundary)CITY_IDDoubleCity FIPS code (based on 2016 city boundary)MULTIPARTShort IntegerMultipart feature (the number of multiple polygons; '1' = singlepart feature)STACKLong IntegerDuplicate geometry (the number of duplicate polygons; '0' = no duplicate polygons)ACRESDoubleParcel area (in acreage)GEOID20Text2020 Census Block Group GEOIDSLOPEShort IntegerSlope information1APN_DUPLong IntegerDuplicate APN (the number of multiple tax roll property records; '0' = no duplicate APN)IL_RATIODoubleRatio of improvement assessed value to land assessed valueLU19Text2019 existing land useLU19_SRCTextSource of 2019 existing land use2SCAGUID16Text2016 SCAG’s parcel unique IDAPNText2016 Assessor’s parcel numberCITY_GP_COText2016 Jurisdiction’s general plan land use designationSCAG_GP_COText2016 SCAG general plan land use codeSP_INDEXShort IntegerSpecific plan index ('0' = outside specific plan area; '1' = inside specific plan area)CITY_SP_COText2016 Jurisdiction’s specific plan land use designationSCAG_SP_COText2016 SCAG specific plan land use codeCITY_ZN_COText2016 Jurisdiction’s zoning codeSCAG_ZN_COText2016 SCAG zoning codeLU16Text2016 existing land useYEARLong IntegerDataset yearPUB_OWNShort IntegerPublic-owned land index ('1' = owned by public agency)PUB_NAMETextName of public agencyPUB_TYPETextType of public agency3BF_SQFTDoubleBuilding footprint area (in square feet)4BSF_NAMETextName of brownfield/superfund site5BSF_TYPETextType of brownfield/superfund site5FIREShort IntegerParcel intersects CalFire Very High Hazard Local Responsibility Areas or State Responsibility Areas (November 2020 version) (CalFIRE)SEARISE36Short IntegerParcel intersects with USGS Coastal Storm Modeling System (CoSMos)1 Meter Sea Level Rise inundation areas for Southern California (v3.0, Phase 2; 2018)SEARISE72Short IntegerParcel intersects with USGS Coastal Storm Modeling System (CoSMos)2 Meter Sea Level Rise inundation areas for Southern California (v3.0, Phase 2; 2018)FLOODShort IntegerParcel intersects with a FEMA 100 Year Flood Plain data from the Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM), obtained from Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in August 10, 2017EQUAKEShort IntegerParcel intersects with an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (California Geological Survey; 2018) LIQUAFAShort IntegerParcel intersects with a Liquefaction Susceptibility Zone (California Geological Survey; 2016)LANDSLIDEShort IntegerParcel intersects with a Landslide Hazard Zone (California Geological Survey; 2016)CPADShort IntegerParcel intersects with a protected area from the California Protected Areas Database(CPAD) – www.calands.org (accessed April 2021)RIPARIANShort IntegerParcel centroid falls within Active River Areas(2010)or parcel intersects with a Wetland Area in the National Wetland Inventory(Version 2)WILDLIFEShort IntegerParcel intersects with wildlife habitat (US Fish & Wildlife ServiceCritical Habitat, Southern California Missing Linkages, Natural Lands & Habitat Corridors from Connect SoCal, CEHC Essential Connectivity Areas,Critical Coastal Habitats)CNDDBShort IntegerThe California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB)includes the status and locations of rare plants and animals in California. Parcels that overlap locations of rare plants and animals in California from the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB)have a greater likelihood of encountering special status plants and animals on the property, potentially leading to further legal requirements to allow development (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). Data accessed in October 2020. HCPRAShort IntegerParcel intersects Natural Community & Habitat Conservation Plans Reserve Designs from the Western Riverside MHSCP, Coachella Valley MHSCP, and the Orange County Central Coastal NCCP/HCP, as accessed in October 2020WETLANDShort IntegerParcel intersects a wetland or deepwater habitat as defined by the US Fish & Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory, Version 2. UAZShort IntegerParcel centroid lies within a Caltrans Adjusted Urbanized AreasUNBUILT_SFDoubleDifference between parcel area and building footprint area expressed in square feet.6GRCRY_1MIShort IntegerThe number of grocery stores within a 1-mile drive7HEALTH_1MIShort IntegerThe number of healthcare facilities within a 1-mile drive7OPENSP_1MIShort IntegerQuantity of open space (roughly corresponding to city blocks’ worth) within a 1-mile drive7TCAC_2021TextThe opportunity level based on the 2021 CA HCD/TCAC opportunity scores.HQTA45Short IntegerField takes a value of 1 if parcel centroid lies within a 2045 High-Quality Transit Area (HQTA)JOB_CTRShort IntegerField takes a value of 1 if parcel centroid lies within a job centerNMAShort IntegerField takes a value of 1 if parcel centroid lies within a neighborhood mobility area. ABS_CONSTRShort IntegerField takes a value of 1 if parcel centroid lies within an absolute constraint area. See the Sustainable Communities Strategy Technical Reportfor details.VAR_CONSTRShort IntegerField takes a value of 1 if parcel centroid lies within a variable constraint area. See the Sustainable Communities Strategy Technical Reportfor details.EJAShort IntegerField takes a value of 1 if parcel centroid lies within an Environmental Justice Area. See the Environmental Justice Technical Reportfor details.SB535Short IntegerField takes a value of 1 if parcel centroid lies within an SB535 Disadvantaged Community area. See the Environmental Justice Technical Reportfor details.COCShort IntegerField takes a value of 1 if parcel centroid lies within a Community of Concern See the Environmental Justice Technical Reportfor details.STATEShort IntegerThis field is a rudimentary estimate of which parcels have adequate physical space to accommodate a typical detached Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)8. SBShort IntegerIndex of ADU eligibility according to the setback reduction policy scenario (from 4 to 2 feet) (1 = ADU eligible parcel, Null = Not ADU eligible parcel)SMShort IntegerIndex of ADU eligibility according to the small ADU policy scenario (from 800 to 600 square feet ADU) (1 = ADU eligible parcel, Null = Not ADU eligible parcel)PKShort IntegerIndex of ADU eligibility according to parking space exemption (200 square feet) policy scenario (1 = ADU eligible parcel, Null = Not ADU eligible parcel)SB_SMShort IntegerIndex of ADU eligibility according to both the setback reduction and small ADU policy scenarios (1 = ADU eligible parcel, Null = Not ADU eligible parcel)SB_PKShort IntegerIndex of ADU eligibility according to both the setback reduction and parking space exemption scenarios (1 = ADU eligible parcel, Null = Not ADU eligible parcel)SM_PKShort IntegerIndex of ADU eligibility according to both the small ADU policy and parking space exemption scenarios (1 = ADU eligible parcel, Null = Not ADU eligible parcel)SB_SM_PKShort IntegerIndex of ADU eligibility according to the setback reduction, small ADU, and parking space exemption scenarios (1 = ADU eligible parcel, Null = Not ADU eligible parcel)1. Slope: '0' - 0~4 percent; '5' - 5~9 percent; '10' - 10~14 percent; '15' = 15~19 percent; '20' - 20~24 percent; '25' = 25 percent or greater.2. Source of 2019 existing land use: SCAG_REF- SCAG's regional geospatial datasets;ASSESSOR- Assessor's 2019 tax roll records; CPAD- California Protected Areas Database (version 2020a; accessed in September 2020); CSCD- California School Campus Database (version 2018; accessed in September 2020); FMMP- Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program's Important Farmland GIS data (accessed in September 2020); MIRTA- U.S. Department of Defense's Military Installations, Ranges, and Training Areas GIS data (accessed in September 2020)3. Type of public agency includes federal, state, county, city, special district, school district, college/university, military.4. Based on 2019 building footprint data obtained from BuildingFootprintUSA (except that 2014 building footprint data was used for Imperial County). Please note that 2019 building footprint data does not cover the entire SCAG region (overlapped with 83% of parcels in the SCAG Region).5. Includes brownfield/superfund site whose address information are matched by SCAG rooftop address locator. Brownfield data was obtained from EPA's Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) database, Cleanups in my community (CIMC), DTSC brownfield Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). Superfund site data was obtained from EPA's Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) database.6. Parcels with a zero value for building footprint area are marked as NULL to indicate this field is not reliable.7. These values are intended as a rudimentary indicator of accessibility developed by SCAG using 2016 InfoUSA business establishment data and 2017 California Protected Areas data. See documentation for details.8. A detailed study conducted by Cal Poly Pomona (CPP) and available hereconducted an extensive review of state and local requirements and development trends for ADUs in the SCAG region and developed a baseline set of assumptions for estimating how many of a jurisdiction’s parcels could accommodate a detached ADU. Please note that these estimates (1) do not include attached or other types of ADUs such as garage conversions or Junior ADUs, and (2)

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
(2021). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2019, nation, U.S., Military Installation National Shapefile [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2019-nation-u-s-military-installation-national-shapefile

TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2019, nation, U.S., Military Installation National Shapefile

Explore at:
5 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Jan 15, 2021
Description

The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The Census Bureau includes landmarks such as military installations in the MTDB for locating special features and to help enumerators during field operations. In 2012, the Census Bureau obtained the inventory and boundaries of most military installations from the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) for Air Force, Army, Marine, and Navy installations and from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for Coast Guard installations. The military installation boundaries in this release represent the updates the Census Bureau made in 2012 in collaboration with DoD.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu