In November 2024, Google.com was the most visited website in the United States, with over 25 billion total visits. YouTube.com came in second with 12 billion total visits. Reddit.com and Amazon.com counted approximately 3.12 billion and 2.89 monthly visits each from U.S. online audiences.

In March 2024, Google.com was the leading website in the United States. The search platform accounted for over 19 percent of desktop web traffic in the United States, ahead of second-ranked YouTube.com with 10.71 percent.

** percent of U.S. respondents answer our survey on "Most used websites and online services by type" with **************. The survey was conducted in 2025, among 13,689 consumers.

This layer is sourced from gis.wim.usgs.gov.

This dataset is part of the Geographical repository maintained by Opendatasoft. This dataset contains data for places and equivalent entities in United States of America.This layer both incorporated places (legal entities) and census designated places or CDPs (statistical entities). An incorporated place is established to provide governmental functions for a concentration of people as opposed to a minor civil division (MCD), which generally is created to provide services or administer an area without regard, necessarily, to population. Places always nest within a state, but may extend across county and county subdivision boundaries. An incorporated place usually is a city, town, village, or borough, but can have other legal descriptions. CDPs are delineated for the decennial census as the statistical counterparts of incorporated places. CDPs are delineated to provide data for settled concentrations of population that are identifiable by name, but are not legally incorporated under the laws of the state in which they are located. The boundaries for CDPs often are defined in partnership with state, local, and/or tribal officials and usually coincide with visible features or the boundary of an adjacent incorporated place or another legal entity. CDP boundaries often change from one decennial census to the next with changes in the settlement pattern and development; a CDP with the same name as in an earlier census does not necessarily have the same boundary. The only population/housing size requirement for CDPs is that they must contain some housing and population. Processors and tools are using this data. Enhancements Add ISO 3166-3 codes. Simplify geometries to provide better performance across the services. Add administrative hierarchy.

A complete list of live websites using the web3.us.com Direct technology, compiled through global website indexing conducted by WebTechSurvey.

This dataset shows information about the USDA Forest Service constructed recreation sites used to populate the public facing webpages. This information is the descriptive and qualitative information used to set appropriate expectations for visitor use and may not contain all the exact engineering, constructed features. View Metadata.

The dataset depicts the authoritative boundaries of the most commonly known Department of Defense (DoD) sites, installations, ranges, and training areas in the United States and Territories. These sites encompass land which is federally owned or otherwise managed. This dataset was created from source data provided by the four Military Service Component headquarters and was compiled by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) Program within the Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment, Business Enterprise Integration Directorate. Sites were selected from the 2010 Base Structure Report (BSR), a summary of the DoD Real Property Inventory. This list does not necessarily represent a comprehensive collection of all Department of Defense facilities, and only those in the fifty United States and US Territories were considered for inclusion. For inventory purposes, installations are comprised of sites, where a site is defined as a specific geographic location of federally owned or managed land and is assigned to military installation. DoD installations are commonly referred to as a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, homeport facility for any ship, or other activity under the jurisdiction, custody, control of the DoD.

This layer is sourced from maps.bts.dot.gov.

Employment statistics on the Historic Sites industry in the US

This product contains 1,297 watershed boundaries for water quality study sites of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Water Quality Program (NWQP) Surface Water Trends project. These include sites where water quality information was collected by both USGS and non-USGS agencies. The data consist of 1,285 boundaries in the conterminous United States, and 12 in Puerto Rico. Twenty-seven percent of boundaries were assembled from other efforts within the USGS which are using the same sites, and 73 percent of boundaries were created new for this project. The data are posted as a single shapefile with separate polygons for each boundary.

Historic sites have been on a steady path to recovery following the upheaval in 2020. With attendance levels nearly reaching pre-pandemic figures, the industry is bouncing back. Visits to historic sites in the US surged by 37.4% from 2021 to 2022, despite lagging behind 2019 levels. Small institutions with budgets under $250,000 saw the most significant gains because of sharper declines during the pandemic, while mid-sized to large institutions face challenges returning to previous visitation figures. Initiatives aimed at restoration and revitalization have been vital, with landmarks like Independence Hall and Colonial Williamsburg undergoing significant projects to enhance visitor engagement and secure funding for preservation efforts. Despite improving attendance, revenue has contracted at a CAGR of 3.1% over the past few years, reaching an estimated $1.5 billion in 2024, when revenue grew 0.8%. While government funding has been inconsistent, leading sites to explore alternative revenue streams, preservation funds have increased, bolstering restoration projects nationwide. Higher admission fees and digital engagement opportunities have supplemented traditional interactions, with some sites introducing virtual tours. Tourism trends, notably a surge in inbound tourism post-2020, have been significant, with international visitors contributing substantially to revenue. However, competition from modern entertainment venues continues to persist, hurting historic sites' profits. Several key dynamics will shape the future of historic sites in the US. The upcoming Semiquincentennial anniversary will result in celebrations and government-backed programs, boosting visitor numbers and driving revenue growth. Climate change poses looming threats, adding complexity to preservation efforts requiring sustainable solutions. Adaptive reuse presents a promising approach for preserving cultural landmarks and introducing contemporary functionalities while maintaining historical integrity. Federal government funding will remain moderate, but advancing energy-efficient systems in adaptive reuse projects offers an optimistic outlook on sustainability. Over the next few years, historic sites must navigate the challenges of balancing history with modern demands to secure their continued viability and cultural significance. Revenue is expected to climb at a CAGR of 1.4%, reaching $1.6 billion in 2029.

The Military Bases dataset was last updated on October 23, 2024 and are defined by Fiscal Year 2023 data, from the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). The dataset depicts the authoritative locations of the most commonly known Department of Defense (DoD) sites, installations, ranges, and training areas world-wide. These sites encompass land which is federally owned or otherwise managed. This dataset was created from source data provided by the four Military Service Component headquarters and was compiled by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) Program within the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment. Only sites reported in the BSR or released in a map supplementing the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (FIRRMA) Real Estate Regulation (31 CFR Part 802) were considered for inclusion. This list does not necessarily represent a comprehensive collection of all Department of Defense facilities. For inventory purposes, installations are comprised of sites, where a site is defined as a specific geographic location of federally owned or managed land and is assigned to military installation. DoD installations are commonly referred to as a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, homeport facility for any ship, or other activity under the jurisdiction, custody, control of the DoD. While every attempt has been made to provide the best available data quality, this data set is intended for use at mapping scales between 1:50,000 and 1:3,000,000. For this reason, boundaries in this data set may not perfectly align with DoD site boundaries depicted in other federal data sources. Maps produced at a scale of 1:50,000 or smaller which otherwise comply with National Map Accuracy Standards, will remain compliant when this data is incorporated. Boundary data is most suitable for larger scale maps; point locations are better suited for mapping scales between 1:250,000 and 1:3,000,000. If a site is part of a Joint Base (effective/designated on 1 October, 2010) as established under the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure process, it is attributed with the name of the Joint Base. All sites comprising a Joint Base are also attributed to the responsible DoD Component, which is not necessarily the pre-2005 Component responsible for the site. A data dictionary, or other source of attribute information, is accessible at https://doi.org/10.21949/1529039

This dataset contains properties eligible for inspection as part of the Parks Inspection Program, and contains internal directives and comments related to the inspection process. Each row represents a property or sub-property. All of these properties have associated geometry. For Parks Inspection Program - All Sites (UNMAPPED), go here: https://data.cityofnewyork.us/City-Government/Parks-Inspection-Program-All-Sites-UNMAPPED-/xs5m-jrpm Data Dictionary and User Guide can be found here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17LSfFUkhHPHJS4hszOYMVmVyU3xVF7J_dILhtIwWKKA/edit?usp=sharing A complete list of all datasets in the series can be found here: https://data.cityofnewyork.us/browse?Data-Collection_Data-Collection=Parks%20Inspection%20Program%20(PIP)&sortBy=alpha

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Priorities List (NPL) Sites Point Data with CIESIN Modifications, Version 2 is a modified version of the 2014 EPA NPL list. It includes all the sites that are proposed, currently on, or deleted from the Final NPL as of February 27, 2014. CIESIN has fixed eleven of the original coordinates by correcting latitude or longitude coordinates. It contains the point locations, including the eleven corrections, for 1,747 U.S. hazardous waste sites on the National Priorities List (NPL) of EPA's Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) for the fifty states, Puerto Rico, and 4 other territorial areas plus the now independent Palau, Federated States of Micronesia. The sites in CERCLIS are also known as Superfund Sites. The NPL is intended primarily to guide the EPA in determining which sites warrant further investigation.

This dataset provides derived disturbance history and predicted annual forest biomass maps at 30-m resolution for six selected Landsat scenes across the Conterminous United States (CONUS) for the period 1985-2014. The focus sites are in the following states: Colorado, Maine, Minnesota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina. These scenes were selected to represent a wide range of forest ecosystems, which ensured that a diversity of forest type groups and forest change processes (e.g., harvest, fire, insects, and urbanization) were included. Disturbance history was derived from a Landsat time-series for each site. Each disturbance is represented by year of detection, duration, and magnitude. The cause of the disturbance was not identified. Forest biomass was measured at field plots within each of the six sites and combined with airborne LiDAR data from each site to create land validation maps. Site biomass at 30-m resolution was estimated by developing Random Forest models that include site disturbance history with the land validation maps.

Major U.S. Fuel Cycle Facility Sites

US EPA Superfund site soil samples. This dataset is not publicly accessible because: EPA cannot release personally identifiable information regarding living individuals, according to the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This dataset contains information about human research subjects. Because there is potential to identify individual participants and disclose personal information, either alone or in combination with other datasets, individual level data are not appropriate to post for public access. Restricted access may be granted to authorized persons by contacting the party listed. It can be accessed through the following means: In the publication and supporting information. Format: These data were generated from US EPA Superfund site soil samples. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Bradham, K., C. Nelson, P. Alava, J. Misenheimer, G. Diamond, W. Thayer, and D. Thomas. Estimating relative bioavailability of soil lead in the mouse. JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH - PART A: CURRENT ISSUES. Taylor & Francis, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA, 79(24): 1179-1182, (2016).

A joint venture involving the National Atlas programs in Canada (Natural Resources Canada), Mexico (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía), and the United States (U.S. Geological Survey), as well as the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation, has led to the release (June 2004) of several new products: an updated paper map of North America, and its associated geospatial data sets and their metadata. These data sets are available online from each of the partner countries for download. The North American Environmental Atlas data are standardized geospatial data sets at 1:10,000,000 scale. A variety of basic data layers (e.g., roads, railroads, populated places, political boundaries, hydrography, bathymetry, sea ice and glaciers) have been integrated so that their relative positions are correct. This collection of data sets forms a base with which other North American thematic data may be integrated. Any data outside of Canada, Mexico, and the United States of America included in the North American Environmental Atlas data sets is strictly to complete the context of the data. The North American Environmental Atlas - Populated Places data set shows a selection of named populated places suitable for use at a scale of 1:10,000,000. Places, which refer to individual municipalities, are always shown using point symbols. These symbols have been fitted to the North American Environmental Atlas roads, railroads, and hydrography layers, so that the points represent the approximate locations of places relative to data in these other layers. The selection of populated places was based on local importance (as shown by population size), importance as a cross-border point, and, occasionally, on other factors. All capital cities (national, provincial, territorial, or State) are shown for Canada, Mexico, and the United States of America. Attributes were added to the data to reflect population class, name, and capital. Cartographic considerations were considered so that names do not overlap in crowded areas, nor are there too many names shown for sparsely populated areas. This is a revised version of the 2004 data set. Files Download

This dataset is about sites in the United States. It has 25 rows. It features 10 columns including country, inscription date, is the site in danger, and removal date.

According to data gathered in the final quarter of 2024, the most popular news wesbites in the United States were Yahoo! and NBC.com, with 57 percent of respondents reporting that they had a positive opinion of each publication. Ranked joint second were CBS.com, and CNN's website.