According to a ranking by Statista and Newsweek, the best hospital in the United States is the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Moreover, the Mayo Clinic was also ranked as the best hospital in the world, among over 50,000 hospitals in 30 countries. Cleveland Clinic in Ohio and the Johns Hopkins Hospital in Maryland were ranked as second and third best respectively in the U.S., while they were second and forth best respectively in the World.

According to a ranking of the best hospitals in the U.S., the best hospital for adult cancer is the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, which had a score of 100 out of 100, as of 2024. This statistic shows the top 10 hospitals for adult cancer in the United States based on the score given by U.S. News and World Report's annual hospital ranking.

According to a ranking of the best hospitals in the U.S., the best hospital for adult cardiology, heart, and vascular surgery is the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, which had a score of 100 out of 100, as of 2024. This statistic shows the top 10 hospitals for adult cardiology, heart, and vascular surgery in the United States based on the score given by U.S. News and World Report's annual hospital ranking.

This statistic depicts a ranking of the top 10 U.S. hospitals based on net patient revenue in 2014. In that year, the Cleveland Clinic Hospital in Cleveland, Ohio, was ranked first in the United States, generating approximately 4.19 billion U.S. dollars of net patient revenue.

This statistic depicts a ranking of the top 10 largest U.S. for-profit hospitals based on the number of beds as of February 2024. At this point, the Methodist Hospital in San Antonio, Texas, was ranked first among such hospitals in the United States, with a total of 1,831 beds. The top three largest for-profit hospitals were all in Texas.

Hospitals play a critical role in healthcare, offering specialized treatments and emergency services essential for public health, regardless of economic fluctuations or individuals' financial situations. Rising incomes and broader access to insurance have fueled demand for care in recent years, supporting hospitals' post-pandemic recovery initiated by federal policies and funding. The recovery for many hospitals was also promoted by mergers that lessened financial strains, especially in rural hospitals. This trend toward consolidation has resulted in fewer enterprises relative to establishments, enhancing hospitals' bargaining power regarding input costs and insurance reimbursements. With this improved position, hospitals are expected to see revenue climb at a CAGR of 2.0%, reaching $1.5 trillion by 2025, with a 3.2% increase in 2025 alone. Competition, economic conditions and regulatory changes will impact hospitals based on size and location. Smaller hospitals, particularly rural ones, may encounter more significant obstacles as the industry transitions from fee-based to value-based care. Independent hospitals face wage inflation, staffing shortages and drug supply costs. Although state and federal policies aim to support small rural hospitals in addressing hospital deserts, uncertainties linger over federal Medicare funding and Medicaid reimbursements, which account for nearly half of hospital care spending. Even so, increasing per capita disposable income and increasing the number of individuals with private insurance will boost revenues from private insurers and out-of-pocket payments for all hospitals, big and small. Hospitals will continue incorporating technological advancements in AI, telemedicine and wearables to enhance their services and reduce cost. These technologies aid hospital systems in strategically expanding outpatient services, mitigating the increasing competitive pressures from Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs) and capitalizing on the increased needs of an aging adult population and shifts in healthcare delivery preferences. As the consolidation trend advances and technology adoption further leverages economies of scale, industry revenue is expected to strengthen at a CAGR of 2.4%, reaching $1.7 trillion by 2030, with steady profit over the period.

This statistic shows the number of beds in the top 10 hospitals for adult cancer in the United States, as of 2017, according to the latest U.S. News Best Hospitals report. The Cleveland Clinic in Ohio had ***** beds within this specialty, which was the highest number of beds among the top 10 adult cancer hospitals.

This statistic depicts a ranking of the top 10 U.S. for-profit hospitals based on gross revenue in 2013. In that year, the Methodist Hospital in San Antonio, Texas, was ranked first in the United States, with a gross revenue of approximately 5.7 billion U.S. dollars.

*Standardized units.Characteristics of the top 50 Cancer Hospitals, as ranked by the US News and World Report.

Adult psychiatry is an important part of medical and mental health treatments in the U.S. As of 2024, the top hospital for adult psychiatry was Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, with a score of ** percent. The score represents the percentage of surveyed psychiatric specialists that named select hospitals as the best for challenging patients. Despite hospitals having a wider range of care options for patients, a majority of the mental health treatment facilities in the U.S. are listed as outpatient care centers without day treatment options or partial hospitalization options. Mental Health in the U.S. In the U.S. millions of people are affected by mental illness every year. Mental illnesses can range from mood disorders such as depression and bipolar disorder to schizophrenia and anxiety disorders. Research has indicated that as of 2022 up to a quarter of adults between the ages of ** and ** in the U.S. had experienced some sort of mental illness within the past year, with rates of mental illness decreasing with age. A recent survey also indicated that among adults in the U.S. those living in Oregon and Utah may have the poorest mental health status among all states. Mental Health Treatment in the U.S. Not all mental health treatment requires hospitalization or psychiatric treatment. Most mental health issues can be addressed and treated in individual or group psychotherapy, but treatment differs drastically based on the type of mental illness. Psychotherapy, medication, case management, hospitalization and support groups are just a few of the ways mental illness can be treated. As of 2023 a larger percentage of U.S. adults utilized prescription medications as opposed to any other kind of therapy. Among adults that sought treatment from a professional for a major depressive episode, a majority had seen a general practitioner or family doctor to treat their mental health issues.

ContextResearch-oriented cancer hospitals in the United States treat and study patients with a range of diseases. Measures of disease specific research productivity, and comparison to overall productivity, are currently lacking.HypothesisDifferent institutions are specialized in research of particular diseases.ObjectiveTo report disease specific productivity of American cancer hospitals, and propose a summary measure.MethodWe conducted a retrospective observational survey of the 50 highest ranked cancer hospitals in the 2013 US News and World Report rankings. We performed an automated search of PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov for published reports and registrations of clinical trials (respectively) addressing specific cancers between 2008 and 2013. We calculated the summed impact factor for the publications. We generated a summary measure of productivity based on the number of Phase II clinical trials registered and the impact factor of Phase II clinical trials published for each institution and disease pair. We generated rankings based on this summary measure.ResultsWe identified 6076 registered trials and 6516 published trials with a combined impact factor of 44280.4, involving 32 different diseases over the 50 institutions. Using a summary measure based on registered and published clinical trails, we ranked institutions in specific diseases. As expected, different institutions were highly ranked in disease-specific productivity for different diseases. 43 institutions appeared in the top 10 ranks for at least 1 disease (vs 10 in the overall list), while 6 different institutions were ranked number 1 in at least 1 disease (vs 1 in the overall list).ConclusionResearch productivity varies considerably among the sample. Overall cancer productivity conceals great variation between diseases. Disease specific rankings identify sites of high academic productivity, which may be of interest to physicians, patients and researchers.

After May 3, 2024, this dataset and webpage will no longer be updated because hospitals are no longer required to report data on COVID-19 hospital admissions, and hospital capacity and occupancy data, to HHS through CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. Data voluntarily reported to NHSN after May 1, 2024, will be available starting May 10, 2024, at COVID Data Tracker Hospitalizations.

The following dataset provides facility-level data for hospital utilization aggregated on a weekly basis (Sunday to Saturday). These are derived from reports with facility-level granularity across two main sources: (1) HHS TeleTracking, and (2) reporting provided directly to HHS Protect by state/territorial health departments on behalf of their healthcare facilities.

The hospital population includes all hospitals registered with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) as of June 1, 2020. It includes non-CMS hospitals that have reported since July 15, 2020. It does not include psychiatric, rehabilitation, Indian Health Service (IHS) facilities, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities, Defense Health Agency (DHA) facilities, and religious non-medical facilities.

For a given entry, the term “collection_week” signifies the start of the period that is aggregated. For example, a “collection_week” of 2020-11-15 means the average/sum/coverage of the elements captured from that given facility starting and including Sunday, November 15, 2020, and ending and including reports for Saturday, November 21, 2020.

Reported elements include an append of either “_coverage”, “_sum”, or “_avg”.

• A “_coverage” append denotes how many times the facility reported that element during that collection week.
• A “_sum” append denotes the sum of the reports provided for that facility for that element during that collection week.
• A “_avg” append is the average of the reports provided for that facility for that element during that collection week.

The file will be updated weekly. No statistical analysis is applied to impute non-response. For averages, calculations are based on the number of values collected for a given hospital in that collection week. Suppression is applied to the file for sums and averages less than four (4). In these cases, the field will be replaced with “-999,999”.

A story page was created to display both corrected and raw datasets and can be accessed at this link: https://healthdata.gov/stories/s/nhgk-5gpv

This data is preliminary and subject to change as more data become available. Data is available starting on July 31, 2020.

Sometimes, reports for a given facility will be provided to both HHS TeleTracking and HHS Protect. When this occurs, to ensure that there are not duplicate reports, deduplication is applied according to prioritization rules within HHS Protect.

For influenza fields listed in the file, the current HHS guidance marks these fields as optional. As a result, coverage of these elements are varied.

For recent updates to the dataset, scroll to the bottom of the dataset description.

On May 3, 2021, the following fields have been added to this data set.

• hhs_ids
• previous_day_admission_adult_covid_confirmed_7_day_coverage
• previous_day_admission_pediatric_covid_confirmed_7_day_coverage
• previous_day_admission_adult_covid_suspected_7_day_coverage
• previous_day_admission_pediatric_covid_suspected_7_day_coverage
• previous_week_personnel_covid_vaccinated_doses_administered_7_day_sum
• total_personnel_covid_vaccinated_doses_none_7_day_sum
• total_personnel_covid_vaccinated_doses_one_7_day_sum
• total_personnel_covid_vaccinated_doses_all_7_day_sum
• previous_week_patients_covid_vaccinated_doses_one_7_day_sum
• previous_week_patients_covid_vaccinated_doses_all_7_day_sum

On May 8, 2021, this data set has been converted to a corrected data set. The corrections applied to this data set are to smooth out data anomalies caused by keyed in data errors. To help determine which records have had corrections made to it. An additional Boolean field called is_corrected has been added.

On May 13, 2021 Changed vaccination fields from sum to max or min fields. This reflects the maximum or minimum number reported for that metric in a given week.

On June 7, 2021 Changed vaccination fields from max or min fields to Wednesday reported only. This reflects that the number reported for that metric is only reported on Wednesdays in a given week.

On September 20, 2021, the following has been updated: The use of analytic dataset as a source.

On January 19, 2022, the following fields have been added to this dataset:

• inpatient_beds_used_covid_7_day_avg
• inpatient_beds_used_covid_7_day_sum
• inpatient_beds_used_covid_7_day_coverage

On April 28, 2022, the following pediatric fields have been added to this dataset:

• all_pediatric_inpatient_bed_occupied_7_day_avg
• all_pediatric_inpatient_bed_occupied_7_day_coverage
• all_pediatric_inpatient_bed_occupied_7_day_sum
• all_pediatric_inpatient_beds_7_day_avg
• all_pediatric_inpatient_beds_7_day_coverage
• all_pediatric_inpatient_beds_7_day_sum
• previous_day_admission_pediatric_covid_confirmed_0_4_7_day_sum
• previous_day_admission_pediatric_covid_confirmed_12_17_7_day_sum
• previous_day_admission_pediatric_covid_confirmed_5_11_7_day_sum
• previous_day_admission_pediatric_covid_confirmed_unknown_7_day_sum
• staffed_icu_pediatric_patients_confirmed_covid_7_day_avg
• staffed_icu_pediatric_patients_confirmed_covid_7_day_coverage
• staffed_icu_pediatric_patients_confirmed_covid_7_day_sum
• staffed_pediatric_icu_bed_occupancy_7_day_avg
• staffed_pediatric_icu_bed_occupancy_7_day_coverage
• staffed_pediatric_icu_bed_occupancy_7_day_sum
• total_staffed_pediatric_icu_beds_7_day_avg
• total_staffed_pediatric_icu_beds_7_day_coverage
• total_staffed_pediatric_icu_beds_7_day_sum

On October 24, 2022, the data includes more analytical calculations in efforts to provide a cleaner dataset. For a raw version of this dataset, please follow this link: https://healthdata.gov/Hospital/COVID-19-Reported-Patient-Impact-and-Hospital-Capa/uqq2-txqb

Due to changes in reporting requirements, after June 19, 2023, a collection week is defined as starting on a Sunday and ending on the next Saturday.

Success.ai’s Healthcare Industry Leads Data and B2B Contact Data for US Healthcare Professionals offers an extensive and verified database tailored to connect businesses with key executives and administrators in the healthcare industry across the United States. With over 170M verified profiles, including work emails and direct phone numbers, this dataset enables precise targeting of decision-makers in hospitals, clinics, and healthcare organizations.

Backed by AI-driven validation technology for unmatched accuracy and reliability, this contact data empowers your marketing, sales, and recruitment strategies. Designed for industry professionals, our continuously updated profiles provide the actionable insights you need to grow your business in the competitive healthcare sector.

Key Features of Success.ai’s US Healthcare Contact Data:

• Comprehensive Healthcare Sector Coverage Access detailed contact information for professionals across the healthcare spectrum:

Hospital Executives: CEOs, CFOs, and COOs managing top-tier facilities. Healthcare Administrators: Decision-makers driving operational excellence. Medical Professionals: Physicians, specialists, and nurse practitioners. Clinic Managers: Leaders in small and mid-sized healthcare organizations.

• AI-Validated Accuracy and Updates

  99% Verified Accuracy: Our advanced AI technology ensures data reliability for optimal engagement. Real-Time Updates: Profiles are continuously refreshed to maintain relevance and accuracy. Minimized Bounce Rates: Save time and resources by reaching verified contacts.

• Customizable Delivery Options Choose how you access the data to match your business requirements:

API Integration: Connect our data directly to your CRM or sales platform. Flat File Delivery: Receive customized datasets in formats suited to your needs.

Why Choose Success.ai for Healthcare Data?

• Best Price Guarantee We ensure competitive pricing for our verified contact data, offering the most comprehensive and cost-effective solution in the market.

• Compliance-Driven and Ethical Data Our data collection adheres to strict global standards, including HIPAA, GDPR, and CCPA compliance, ensuring secure and ethical usage.

• Strategic Benefits for Your Business Success.ai’s US healthcare professional data unlocks numerous business opportunities:

Targeted Marketing: Develop tailored campaigns aimed at healthcare executives and decision-makers. Efficient Sales Outreach: Engage with key contacts to accelerate your sales process. Recruitment Optimization: Access verified profiles to identify and recruit top talent in the healthcare industry. Market Intelligence: Use detailed firmographic and demographic insights to guide strategic decisions. Partnership Development: Build valuable relationships within the healthcare ecosystem.

• Data Highlights 170M+ Verified Profiles 50M Direct Phone Numbers 700M Global Professional Profiles 70M Verified Company Profiles

Key APIs for Advanced Functionality

• Enrichment API Enhance your existing contact data with real-time updates, ensuring accuracy and relevance for your outreach initiatives.

• Lead Generation API Drive high-quality lead generation efforts by utilizing verified contact information, including work emails and direct phone numbers, for up to 860,000 API calls per day.

• Use Cases

1. Healthcare Marketing Campaigns Target verified executives and administrators to deliver personalized and impactful marketing campaigns.

2. Sales Enablement Connect with key decision-makers in healthcare organizations, ensuring higher conversion rates and shorter sales cycles.

3. Talent Acquisition Source and engage healthcare professionals and administrators with accurate, up-to-date contact information.

4. Strategic Partnerships Foster collaborations with healthcare institutions and professionals to expand your business network.

5. Industry Analysis Leverage enriched contact data to gain insights into the US healthcare market, helping you refine your strategies.

• What Sets Success.ai Apart?

Verified Accuracy: AI-driven technology ensures 99% reliability for all contact details. Comprehensive Reach: Covering healthcare professionals from large hospital systems to smaller clinics nationwide. Flexible Access: Customizable data delivery methods tailored to your business needs. Ethical Standards: Fully compliant with healthcare and data protection regulations.

Success.ai’s B2B Contact Data for US Healthcare Professionals is the ultimate solution for connecting with industry leaders, driving impactful marketing campaigns, and optimizing your recruitment strategies. Our commitment to quality, accuracy, and affordability ensures you achieve exceptional results while adhering to ethical and legal standards.

No one beats us on price. Period.

This statistic shows the number of doctors in the top 10 hospitals for adult cardiology and heart surgery in the United States, as of 2016, according to the latest U.S. News Best Hospitals report. The highest number among the top 10 adult cardiology hospitals was reported for the Mount Sinai Hospital of New York with 440 doctors within this specialty area.

This statistic shows the top 10 most expensive conditions in U.S. hospitals with an expected payer of private insurance during 2017. Septicemia was ranked third for private insurance with more than 6.6 billion U.S. dollars.

This statistic depicts the top 10 most expensive conditions in U.S. hospitals ith an expected payer of Medicaid during 2017. With approximately 1.6 billion U.S. dollars in total, diabetes mellitus with complication was ranked fifth.

Why Not the Best VA or WNTBVA is a system for comparing Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospital system performance with regional and U.S. national benchmarks. This report includes key quality measures available on CMS Hospital Compare and top hospital recognition programs from reporting agencies of hospital quality. These .ZIP files are no longer supported and are in an 'as-is' state. They were accurate at time of publication. This currently only has Q1

In the past five years, the healthcare sector's growth has supported hospital bed manufacturers' revenue. Population growth, rising obesity rates, and an increase in older adults have heightened demand for healthcare services. Healthcare providers have accordingly been expanding facilities, especially in underserved areas, leading to greater demand for hospital beds. While international trade of hospital beds has seen historic levels of volatility, exports remain elevated after skyrocketing at the height of the pandemic. Revenue has been climbing at a CAGR of 2.1% to an estimated $2.8 billion over the five years through 2024. Revenue has swelled by 2.3% in 2024 alone. Product innovation has been a critical driver for hospital bed manufacturers. Companies have integrated advanced technologies into their products to differentiate from competitors, enhancing features like integrated monitoring systems, new therapeutic capabilities and pressure redistribution. These advancements aim to boost patient care and operational efficiency. Hospitals increasingly seek beds with real-time monitoring capabilities, allowing them to quickly respond to patient needs and make informed decisions. Manufacturers drive sales by tapping into hospitals' pressure to provide the best care available to their patients by bringing new, more effective hospital beds to market. Still, price competition between manufacturers of standardized acute care beds remains intense. The healthcare sector will continue to consolidate as demand climbs and economies of scale become a larger priority. This trend will especially benefit larger hospital bed manufacturers through established relationships with major buyers. As healthcare spending rises amid population growth, aging demographics and expanded insurance coverage, demand for hospital beds is expected to remain strong. Crowded hospitals will support at-home care, supported by Medicare for compatible needs, further driving hospital bed sales. Emerging markets like China and India offer promising growth opportunities for hospital bed manufacturers because of improving healthcare infrastructure and rising expenditures. Companies will likely invest in these regions, taking advantage of a slipping US dollar to enhance export potential. Revenue is set to rise at a CAGR of 2.3% to an estimated $3.1 billion through the end of 2029.

This statistic depicts the top 10 most innovative IT hospitals in the U.S. in 2018, by the percentage of their budget attributed to IT. At that time Nicklaus Children's Hospital System in Miami, Florida was the most innovative hospital with over 10 percent of their operating budget dedicated to IT.

Global And US Bariatric Hospital Beds And Stretchers Market was valued at USD 2,930.50 Million in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 4,684.93 Million by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 5.51% from 2024 to 2031.

Global And US Bariatric Hospital Beds And Stretchers Market Overview

Stretchers and bariatric hospital beds are essential for giving patients with particular needs the best care possible. Bariatric beds and stretchers are also equipped with electronic CPR positioning, swiftly adjusting the bed for optimal resuscitation efforts. In addition, a mechanical CPR feature keeps the bed backrest flat in case of emergency, guaranteeing quick action and patient stabilization. The latest developments in bariatric hospital beds and stretchers have given vast improvement in care and safety in treating obese patients. Several of these features include higher weight capacities, often higher than a value of 1,000 pounds.

This value has necessitated the use of stronger construction materials to answer the purpose of durability and stability. The state-of-the-art motorized positioning system provides the best solution as far as the mobility of patients and user-friendliness are concerned. Scales and monitoring incorporated into the system provide for continuous weight tracking and vital sign monitoring. These widened bed frames with reinforced side rails make these ergonomic designs more comfortable and secure, reducing the risk of falling. Further reduction of complications or improvement in the outcome for patients in bariatric care is obtained with pressure redistribution surfaces, and dynamic air mattresses to prevent pressure ulcers.