The Organic INTEGRITY Database is a certified organic operations database that contains up-to-date and accurate information about operations that may and may not sell as organic, deterring fraud, increases supply chain transparency for buyers and sellers, and promotes market visibility for organic operations. Only certified operations can sell, label, or represent products as organic, unless exempt or excluded from certification. The INTEGRITY database improves access to certified organic operation information by giving industry and public users an easier way to search for data with greater precision than the formerly posted Annual Lists of Certified Operations. You can find a certified organic farm or business, or search for an operation with specific characteristics such as:

The status of an operation: Certified, Surrendered, Revoked, or Suspended The scopes for which an operation is certified: Crops, Livestock, Wild Crops, or Handling

The organic commodities and services that operations offer. A new, more structured classification system (sample provided) will help you find more of what you’re looking for and details about the flexible taxonomy can be found in the INTEGRITY Categories and Items list. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Organic INTEGRITY Database. File Name: Web Page, url: https://organic.ams.usda.gov/integrity/Default.aspx Find a specific certified organic farm or business, or search for an operation with specific characteristics. Listings come from USDA-Accredited Certifying Agents. Historical Annual Lists of Certified Organic Operations and monthly snapshots of the full data set are available for download on the Data History page. Only certified operations can sell, label or represent products as organic, unless exempt or excluded from certification.

This dataset contains information on certified organic farms and businesses physically located in Iowa. These farms and businesses have successfully passed an inspection from a USDA National Organic Program Accredited Inspection Agency. For more information please visit the USDA National Organic Program website: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/nop

The following is a list Certified Organic Farmers in Connecticut. These farms have successfully passed an inspection from a USDA National Organic Program Accredited Inspection Agency.

For more information please visit the USDA National Organic Program website: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/nop

Note: Updates to this data product are discontinued. ERS collected data from USDA-accredited State and private certification groups to calculate the extent of certified organic farmland acreage and livestock in the United States. These are presented in tables showing the change in U.S. organic acreage and livestock numbers from 1992 to 2011 (see the National tables section). Data for 1997 and 2000-11 are presented by State and commodity (see the State tables section).This record was taken from the USDA Enterprise Data Inventory that feeds into the https://data.gov catalog. Data for this record includes the following resources: Web page with links to Excel files For complete information, please visit https://data.gov.

Note: Updates to this data product are discontinued. This data set provides farmgate and wholesale prices for select organic and conventional fruits and vegetables, wholesale prices for organic and conventional poultry (broilers) and eggs, as well as f.o.b. and spot prices for organic grain and feedstuffs. Prices are based on those reported by USDA Agricultural Marketing Service Market News, Organic Food Business News, and USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service.This record was taken from the USDA Enterprise Data Inventory that feeds into the https://data.gov catalog. Data for this record includes the following resources: Web page with links to Excel files For complete information, please visit https://data.gov.

Analysis of ‘USDA Certified Organic Growers’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/9e3ca844-0fbf-4834-9ed3-af50fd1d8a24 on 26 January 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

The following is a list Certified Organic Farmers in Connecticut. These farms have successfully passed an inspection from a USDA National Organic Program Accredited Inspection Agency.

For more information please visit the USDA National Organic Program website: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/nop

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

This repository contains data and code used in:

Isaac Mpanga, Russel Trondstad, Jessica Guo, David LeBauer, and John Omololu, 2021. On-farm land management strategies and production challenges in United States Organic Agricultural Systems. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability.

It provides USDA Surveys of Agricultural Production from 2008-2019 to investigate state and national trends by state in organic farm area, number, and sales, as well to evaluate national trends in on-farm land-use practices and challenges facing US organic production.

It also includes code used to transform, visualize, and analyze the data, and derived data products - notably organic farm area and sales with values imputed to correct for redacted state level measures.

Note: Updates to this data product are discontinued. Get select results from the 2004 and 2007 Nationwide Surveys of Organic Manufacturers, Processors, and Distributors. Data are available on 9 commodity groups, such as fruit and nuts, and 45 commodities, such as berries and citrus. The vast majority of organic commodities pass through the hands of at least one middleman, also called a handler, on the way from the farmer to the consumer. Certified organic handlers are certified to handle organic products in accordance with National Organic Standards. Organic handlers perform numerous functions, including packing and shipping, manufacturing and processing, and brokering, wholesaling, or distributing.This record was taken from the USDA Enterprise Data Inventory that feeds into the https://data.gov catalog. Data for this record includes the following resources: Webpage with links to Excel files For complete information, please visit https://data.gov.

The USDA Organic market has emerged as a significant force in the food and agriculture sector, promoting products that meet stringent standards set by the United States Department of Agriculture for organic farming and processing. This sector not only focuses on the cultivation of crops without synthetic pesticides

52924 Global export shipment records of Certified organic with prices, volume & current Buyer's suppliers relationships based on actual Global export trade database.

The Southern Great Plains 1997 (SGP97) Hydrology Experiment originated from an interdisciplinary investigation, "Soil Moisture Mapping at Satellite Temporal and Spatial Scales" (PI: Thomas J. Jackson, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD) selected under the NASA Research Announcement 95-MTPE-03. The core of the 1997 experiment involves the deployment of the L-band Electronically Scanned Thinned Array Radiometer (ESTAR) for daily mapping of surface soil moisture. The region selected for investigation is the best instrumented site for surface soil moisture, hydrology and meteorology in the world. This includes the USDA/ARS Little Washita Watershed, the USDA/ARS facility at El Reno, Oklahoma, the ARM/CART central facility, as well as the Oklahoma Mesonet. The temporal coverage for this dataset is as follows: Begin datetime: 1995-10-01 00:00:00, End datetime: 2001-03-31 23:59:59. The Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Southern Great Plains (SGP) Organic Carbon and Organic Matter Soils Data Set is one of the various sub-surface data sets developed for the GCIP (Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment [GEWEX] Continental-scale International Project) Enhanced Observation Period (EOP) Data Set. This data set contains a summary table of the measured organic carbon percentage and the estimated organic matter percentage in the near surface soil at each of the ARM SWATS (Soil Water and Temperature System) sites at the SGP site. The soil characterizations were performed by Oklahoma State University. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: GeoData catalog record. File Name: Web Page, url: https://geodata.nal.usda.gov/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/SGP97armSoils_JJM_2015-04-23_1027

2731 Germany import shipment records of Certified organic with prices, volume & current Buyer’s suppliers relationships based on actual Germany import trade database.

Percent of farms that are Certified Organic farms producing products according to the National Organic Program Standards.

Ag Census Data Name: (FARM OPERATIONS, ORGANIC - NUMBER OF OPERATIONS) / (FARM OPERATIONS - NUMBER OF OPERATIONS) *100

Data source: United States Department of Agriculture, Census of Agriculture

Date: 2017

Subscribers can find out export and import data of 23 countries by HS code or product’s name. This demo is helpful for market analysis.

State fact sheets provide information on population, income, education, employment, federal funds, organic agriculture, farm characteristics, farm financial indicators, top commodities, and exports, for each State in the United States. Links to county-level data are included when available.This record was taken from the USDA Enterprise Data Inventory that feeds into the https://data.gov catalog. Data for this record includes the following resources: Query tool For complete information, please visit https://data.gov.

The product has been split, please select one of the products below:
Share of organic crop area out of the total utilised agricultural area (UAA) (until 2011)
Organic crop area by agricultural production methods and crops (until 2011)

Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Service Protocol: Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Application Profile: Web Browser. Link Function: information

Maize and soybean yield data set for Precision Zonal Management (PZM) project from 2012-2015. Project compared chisel plow tillage against ridge tillage (PZM) systems, with and without winter cereal rye cover crops. Experimental sites in four US states: IL, MI, MN and PA. Data set provides plot-level yield data (kg/ha) for each site-year and for both crops. File also contains data set of maize and soybean yield stability, with soil properties measured in 2015 (end of experimental period) and delta values (values in 2015 minus values prior to experiment establishment in 2011). Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Data for: A regionally-adapted implementation of conservation agriculture delivers rapid improvements to soil properties associated with crop yield stability. File Name: PZM_yields_stability_soil.xlsxResource Description: Data files combined into a single excel document.Resource Title: Data Dictionary. File Name: PZM_data_dictionary.csvResource Title: Yield data for: A regionally-adapted implementation of conservation agriculture delivers rapid improvements to soil properties associated with crop yield stability. File Name: PZM_Yields.csvResource Title: Stable Soil data for: A regionally-adapted implementation of conservation agriculture delivers rapid improvements to soil properties associated with crop yield stability. File Name: PZM_stable_soil.csv

Data presented are on carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) inputs, and changes in soil C and N in eight systems during the first eight years of a tillage-intensive organic vegetable systems study that was focused on romaine lettuce and broccoli production in Salinas Valley on the central coast region of California. The eight systems differed in organic matter inputs from cover crops and urban yard-waste compost. The cover crops included cereal rye, a legume-rye mixture, and a mustard mixture planted at two seeding rates (standard rate 1x versus high rate 3x). There were three legume-rye 3x systems that differed in compost inputs (0 versus 7.6 Mg ha−1 vegetable crop−1) and cover cropping frequency (every winter versus every fourth winter). The data include: (1) changes in soil total organic C and total N concentrations and stocks and nitrate N (NO3-N) concentrations over 8 years, (2) cumulative above ground and estimated below ground C and N inputs, cover crop and crop N uptake, and harvested crop N export over 8 years, (3) soil permanganate oxidizable carbon (POX-C) concentrations and stocks at time 0, 6 and 8 years, and (4) cumulative, estimated yields of lettuce and broccoli (using total biomass and harvest index values) over the 8 years. The C inputs from the vegetables and cover crops included estimates of below ground inputs based on shoot biomass and literature values for shoot:root. The data in this article support and augment information presented in the PLoS ONE research article “Winter cover crops increase readily decomposable soil carbon, but compost drives total soil carbon during eight years of intensive, organic vegetable production in California”. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Supplementary materials. File Name: Web Page, url: https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S2352340920313639-mmc1.zip Zipped Excel (xlsx) data comprising Supplementary Table 1: Raw data of soil total organic carbon concentrations, total nitrogen concentrations, nitrate nitrogen concentrations, total organic carbon stocks, and total nitrogen stocks over 8 years from the Salinas Organic Cropping Systems experiment in Salinas, California. This includes data from all eight systems in the experiment. The related article in PLoS ONE only included data from five of the eight systems with optimal seeding rates for weed suppression. Supplementary Table 2: Raw data of cumulative cover crop and vegetable carbon inputs, legume nitrogen fixation, cover crop and vegetable crop N uptake and export during 8 years at the Salinas Organic Cropping Systems experiment in Salinas, California. This includes data from all eight systems in the experiment. The related article in PLoS ONE only included data from five of the eight systems with optimal seeding rates for weed suppression. Supplementary Table 3: Raw data of soil permanganate oxidizable carbon (POX-C) concentrations and stocks at the 0 to 6.7 cm depth in years 0 and 6, and the 0 to 30 cm depth in year 8 from the Salinas Organic Cropping Systems experiment in Salinas, California This data from five of the eight systems with optimal seeding rates for weed suppression was included the related paper in PLoS ONE. Supplementary Table 4: Raw data of cumulative, estimated yields of lettuce and broccoli crop during 8 years at the Salinas Organic Cropping Systems experiment in Salinas, California; yields are on an oven-dry basis. This includes data from all eight systems in the experiment.

This data package was produced by researchers working on the Shortgrass Steppe Long Term Ecological Research (SGS-LTER) Project, administered at Colorado State University. Long-term datasets and background information (proposals, reports, photographs, etc.) on the SGS-LTER project are contained in a comprehensive project collection within the Digital Collections of Colorado (http://digitool.library.colostate.edu/R/?func=collections&collection_id=3429). The data table and associated metadata document, which is generated in Ecological Metadata Language, may be available through other repositories serving the ecological research community and represent components of the larger SGS-LTER project collection. Our research on abandoned fields at the CPER has two aspects,vegetation recovery and soil recovery. We wish to monitor these fields for the tem of the LTER project (decades or centuries), and to address some specific research questions. Our questions are: 1. Does vegetation on shortgrass steppe recover 55 years following cultivation? Specifically, does Bouteloua gracilis, the dominant shortgrass steppe species, recover? Prior results indicated that B. gracilis reovers on some fields, and does not on others. The fields that do not are dominated by buffalo grass. In this new work at the CPER, we ask an additional question: 2. What determines whether B. gracilis recovers? 3. Does soil organic matter recover following abandonment? Specifically, do indices of soil fertility such as nitrogen availability recover? 4. Does small-scale patterning associated with individual plants recover following disturbance? 5. Does the rate of soil recovery depend upon the rate of vegetation recovery? Past results on the Pawnee National Grasslands indicated that only small amounts of organic matter had accumulated following abandonment but that nitrogen availability had recovered to its original levels under B. gracilis plants on the abandoned fields. Specifically, we are interested in whether it makes a difference to soils if blue grama recovers or not. Additional information and referenced materials can be found: http://hdl.handle.net/10217/82140 Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Website Pointer to html file. File Name: Web Page, url: https://portal.edirepository.org/nis/mapbrowse?scope=knb-lter-sgs&identifier=102 Webpage with information and links to data files for download