Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.ycharts.com/termshttps://www.ycharts.com/terms
View yearly updates and historical trends for Utah Establishment Birth Rate. Source: Census Bureau. Track economic data with YCharts analytics.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
It is a Dataset of Total Fertility Rate of all India States and Union Territory in NFHS (National Health Family Survey 2015-2016) and NFHS 2019-2021. This Dataset contain the population of All States and Union Territory latest updates to 2021 and GDP per Capita latest by 2019. Data is Sorted in Descending order by GDP per capita.
Note that GDP of Dadar Nagar Haveli and Daman Diu, Ladakh and Lakshadweep are not available hence taken as the Default (1000000) value.
Facebook
TwitterIn 2022, the number of births in Utah amounted to ****** births and the cesarean delivery rate stood at ** percent. Furthermore, in Utah, just under one out of every ten babies were delivered preterm in 2022. This statistic shows the percentage of preterm birth and cesarean delivery in Utah in 2022.
Facebook
TwitterU.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
This data set contains Utah Population Estimates, Net Migration, Births and Deaths for Utah from 1980-2015. Data in this table may differ from other tables due to different sources of data or rounding. In 1996, the Utah Population Estimates Committee changed the convention on rounded estimates so it published unrounded estimates. Accordingly, the revised estimates for 1990 and thereafter are not rounded.
Facebook
TwitterIn 2024, 34.59 percent of all households in the United States were two person households. In 1970, this figure was at 28.92 percent. Single households Single mother households are usually the most common households with children under 18 years old found in the United States. As of 2021, the District of Columbia and North Dakota had the highest share of single-person households in the United States. Household size in the United States has decreased over the past century, due to customs and traditions changing. Families are typically more nuclear, whereas in the past, multigenerational households were more common. Furthermore, fertility rates have also decreased, meaning that women do not have as many children as they used to. Average households in Utah Out of all states in the U.S., Utah was reported to have the largest average household size. This predominately Mormon state has about three million inhabitants. The Church of the Latter-Day Saints, or Mormonism, plays a large role in Utah, and can contribute to the high birth rate and household size in Utah. The Church of Latter-Day Saints promotes having many children and tight-knit families. Furthermore, Utah has a relatively young population, due to Mormons typically marrying and starting large families younger than those in other states.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comprehensive dataset containing 35 verified Birth center businesses in Utah, United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comprehensive dataset containing 6 verified Birth control center businesses in Utah, United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.
Facebook
TwitterThis data contains all the essential data in the form of % with respect to rural and urban Indian states . This dataset is highly accurate as this is taken from the Indian govt. it is updated till 2021 for all states and union territories. source of data is data.gov.in titled - ******All India and State/UT-wise Factsheets of National Family Health Survey******
it is advised to you pls search the data keywords you need by using (Ctrl+f) , as it will help to avoid time wastage. States/UTs
Different columns it contains are Area
Number of Households surveyed Number of Women age 15-49 years interviewed Number of Men age 15-54 years interviewed
Female population age 6 years and above who ever attended school (%)
Population below age 15 years (%)
Sex ratio of the total population (females per 1,000 males)
Sex ratio at birth for children born in the last five years (females per 1,000 males)
Children under age 5 years whose birth was registered with the civil authority (%)
Deaths in the last 3 years registered with the civil authority (%)
Population living in households with electricity (%)
Population living in households with an improved drinking-water source1 (%)
Population living in households that use an improved sanitation facility2 (%)
Households using clean fuel for cooking3 (%) Households using iodized salt (%)
Households with any usual member covered under a health insurance/financing scheme (%)
Children age 5 years who attended pre-primary school during the school year 2019-20 (%)
Women (age 15-49) who are literate4 (%)
Men (age 15-49) who are literate4 (%)
Women (age 15-49) with 10 or more years of schooling (%)
Men (age 15-49) with 10 or more years of schooling (%)
Women (age 15-49) who have ever used the internet (%)
Men (age 15-49) who have ever used the internet (%)
Women age 20-24 years married before age 18 years (%)
Men age 25-29 years married before age 21 years (%)
Total Fertility Rate (number of children per woman) Women age 15-19 years who were already mothers or pregnant at the time of the survey (%)
Adolescent fertility rate for women age 15-19 years5 Neonatal mortality rate (per 1000 live births)
Infant mortality rate (per 1000 live births) Under-five mortality rate (per 1000 live births)
Current Use of Family Planning Methods (Currently Married Women Age 15-49 years) - Any method6 (%)
Current Use of Family Planning Methods (Currently Married Women Age 15-49 years) - Any modern method6 (%)
Current Use of Family Planning Methods (Currently Married Women Age 15-49 years) - Female sterilization (%)
Current Use of Family Planning Methods (Currently Married Women Age 15-49 years) - Male sterilization (%)
Current Use of Family Planning Methods (Currently Married Women Age 15-49 years) - IUD/PPIUD (%)
Current Use of Family Planning Methods (Currently Married Women Age 15-49 years) - Pill (%)
Current Use of Family Planning Methods (Currently Married Women Age 15-49 years) - Condom (%)
Current Use of Family Planning Methods (Currently Married Women Age 15-49 years) - Injectables (%)
Total Unmet need for Family Planning (Currently Married Women Age 15-49 years)7 (%)
Unmet need for spacing (Currently Married Women Age 15-49 years)7 (%)
Health worker ever talked to female non-users about family planning (%)
Current users ever told about side effects of current method of family planning8 (%)
Mothers who had an antenatal check-up in the first trimester (for last birth in the 5 years before the survey) (%)
Mothers who had at least 4 antenatal care visits (for last birth in the 5 years before the survey) (%)
Mothers whose last birth was protected against neonatal tetanus (for last birth in the 5 years before the survey)9 (%)
Mothers who consumed iron folic acid for 100 days or more when they were pregnant (for last birth in the 5 years before the survey) (%)
Mothers who consumed iron folic acid for 180 days or more when they were pregnant (for last birth in the 5 years before the survey} (%)
Registered pregnancies for which the mother received a Mother and Child Protection (MCP) card (for last birth in the 5 years before the survey) (%)
Mothers who received postnatal care from a doctor/nurse/LHV/ANM/midwife/other health personnel within 2 days of delivery (for last birth in the 5 years before the survey) (%)
Average out-of-pocket expenditure per delivery in a public health facility (for last birth in the 5 years before the survey) (Rs.)
Children born at home who were taken to a health facility for a check-up within 24 hours of birth (for last birth in the 5 years before the survey} (%)
Children who received postnatal care from a doctor/nurse/LHV/ANM/midwife/ other health personnel within 2 days of delivery (for last birth in the 5 years before the survey) (%)
Institutional births (in the 5...
Facebook
TwitterAs of 2016, the top U.S. hospital for child birth is Northside Hospital in Atlanta, Georgia. All hospitals are required, by law, to report and provide access to birth records through the federal National Vital Statistics system. The U.S. system of reporting births (and deaths) is funded by individual States as well as through the National Center for Health Statistics.
Georgia birth data
Georgia is one of the most populous states in the United States. The metropolitan area with the highest birth rate in the U.S. was Hinesville, Georgia. Hinesville is located in the south eastern section of the state of Georgia. Despite having the hospital that delivers the most babies in the U.S., Georgia does not have one of highest birth rates in the U.S. As of 2017, Utah had the highest birth rate in the United States.
Birth-related developments
The number of U.S. births has remained relatively stable since 1990. Despite having a relatively stable birth rate, the number bassinet available in U.S. hospitals is on the decline. Birth rates, however, show variation among different U.S. populations. Mothers of American Indian or Alaska Native descent tend to have higher birth rates than other ethnicities.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comprehensive dataset containing 2 verified Birth certificate service businesses in Utah, United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.
Facebook
TwitterFuture county population was based on projections for 2100 from the Spatially Explicit Regional Growth Model (SERGoM; Theobald 2005). SERGoM simulates population based on existing patterns of growth by census block, groundwater well and road density, and transportation distance to urban areas, while constraining the pattern of development to areas outside of protected areas and urban areas (Theobald 2005). The dataset here is a projection for a “baseline” growth scenario that assumes a similar trajectory to that of current urban growth (Bierwagen et al. 2010). SERGoM accuracy is estimated as 79–99% when compared to 1990 and 2000 census data, with the accuracy varying by urban/exurban/rural categories and increasing slightly with coarser resolution (Theobald 2005). The accuracy of future model predictions with different economic scenarios is most sensitive to fertility rates, which are subject to cultural change, economic recessions, and the current pattern of lands protected from development (Bierwagen et al. 2010). Bierwagen, B. G., D. M. Theobald, C. R. Pyke, A. Choate, P. Groth, J. V. Thomas, and P. Morefield. 2010. National housing and impervious surface scenarios for integrated climate impact assessments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107:20887-20892. Theobald, D. M. 2005. Landscape patterns of exurban growth in the USA from 1980 to 2020. Ecology and Society 10: article 32.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset tabulates the data for the Utah County, UT population pyramid, which represents the Utah County population distribution across age and gender, using estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates. It lists the male and female population for each age group, along with the total population for those age groups. Higher numbers at the bottom of the table suggest population growth, whereas higher numbers at the top indicate declining birth rates. Furthermore, the dataset can be utilized to understand the youth dependency ratio, old-age dependency ratio, total dependency ratio, and potential support ratio.
Key observations
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates.
Age groups:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Utah County Population by Age. You can refer the same here
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.ycharts.com/termshttps://www.ycharts.com/terms
View yearly updates and historical trends for Utah Establishment Birth Rate. Source: Census Bureau. Track economic data with YCharts analytics.