Web mapping application containing utility information for Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

The size and share of the market is categorized based on Type (Utility Mapping, Subsurface Utility Engineering, GIS Mapping, 3D Mapping) and Application (Infrastructure Planning, Construction, Environmental Surveys, Asset Management) and geographical regions (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and Middle-East and Africa).

The subsurface utility mapping (SUM) market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing urbanization, infrastructure development projects, and the need to prevent costly damage to underground utilities. The market, valued at approximately $12 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 8% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. Firstly, stringent regulations mandating utility mapping before excavation projects are significantly contributing to market demand. Secondly, technological advancements, such as the adoption of LiDAR, ground-penetrating radar (GPR), and GIS technologies, are improving the accuracy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of SUM. Furthermore, the rising adoption of 3D modeling and data analytics enhances the value proposition of SUM by providing comprehensive visualization and analysis of underground infrastructure. The market segmentation demonstrates a diverse landscape, with significant contributions from both the hardware (sensors, GPR systems) and software (data processing, analysis platforms) segments, catering to various applications like water pipelines, gas pipelines, electric cables, and telecommunications. North America and Europe currently hold the largest market share, reflecting advanced infrastructure and stringent regulatory environments. However, rapid infrastructure development in Asia-Pacific is projected to drive substantial market growth in the coming years. The restraints to market growth include the high initial investment costs associated with advanced SUM technologies and a shortage of skilled professionals capable of operating and interpreting the data generated. Despite these challenges, the long-term benefits of preventing utility damage, improving project efficiency, and ensuring public safety are driving the continued adoption of SUM. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of established companies specializing in specific technologies or services and emerging players focusing on innovative solutions. Future market growth will hinge on continued technological innovation, the development of user-friendly software, and the increasing integration of SUM data with other infrastructure management systems, paving the way for smarter cities and improved infrastructure management globally.

The Underground Utility Mapping Market is anticipated to grow from $674.52 million in 2025 to $1,330.60 million by 2033, exhibiting a CAGR of 7.88% during the forecast period (2025-2033). This growth can be attributed to the rising need for accurate and efficient mapping of underground utilities to prevent damage and disruptions during construction and excavation projects. Furthermore, the increasing adoption of advanced technologies, such as electromagnetic induction and ground-penetrating radar, is driving market growth. The market is primarily driven by the increasing demand for damage prevention and asset management in the construction and utilities sectors. The growing adoption of underground utility mapping services by engineering and telecommunications companies is also contributing to the market growth. Moreover, the rising awareness about the importance of accurate underground utility mapping to avoid accidents and ensure public safety is fueling the market expansion. Key drivers for this market are: Enhanced 3D mapping for precise asset localization AI and automation for real-time utility detection Growing demand from smart city and infrastructure projects Integration with GIS systems for data management and analysis Rising environmental concerns and the need for sustainable solutions. Potential restraints include: Increasing Infrastructure Development Growing Adoption of Geographic Information Systems GIS Technological Advancements in Mapping and Data Analysis Government Regulations and Safety Concerns Rise in Utility Relocation and Maintenance Projects.

This data provides graphic representation of electric company territories of New Jersey. Data was compiled using Electric Utility paper maps, all greater than 1:500,000. It is anticipated that electric company territorial boundaries will remain stable.

A Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN) is issued by the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT), and authorizes a utility to provide water and/or sewer service to a specific service area. The CCN obligates the water or sewer retail public utility to provide continuous and adequate service to every customer who requests service in that area. The maps and digital data provided in the Water and Sewer CCN Viewer delineate the official CCN service areas and CCN facility lines issued by the PUCT and its predecessor agencies. This dataset is a Texas statewide polygon layer of sewer CCN service areas. The CCNs were digitized from Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) county mylar maps. The mylar maps were the base maps on which the CCNs were originally drawn and maintained. CCNs are currently created and maintained using digitizing methods, coordinate geography or imported from digital files submitted by the applicant. TxDOT digital county urban road files are used as the base maps on which the CCNs are geo-referenced. It is best to view the sewer CCN service area data in conjunction with the sewer CCN facility line data, since these two layers together represent all of the retail public sewer utilities in Texas.*Important Notes: The CCN spatial dataset and metadata were last updated on: October 4, 2022The official state-wide CCN spatial dataset includes all types of CCN services areas: water and sewer CCN service areas; water and sewer CCN facility lines. This CCN spatial dataset is updated on a quarterly, or as needed basis using Geographic Information System (GIS) software called ArcGIS 10.8.2.The complete state-wide CCN spatial dataset is available for download from the following website: http://www.puc.texas.gov/industry/water/utilities/gis.aspxThe Water and Sewer CCN Viewer may be accessed from the following web site: http://www.puc.texas.gov/industry/water/utilities/map.htmlIf you have questions about this CCN spatial dataset or about CCN mapping requirements, please e-mail CCN Mapping Staff: water@puc.texas.govTYPE - Indicates whether a CCN is considered a water or a sewer system. If the CCN number begins with a '"1", the CCN is considered a water system (utility). If a CCN number begins with a "2", the CCN is considered a sewer system (utility).CCN_NO - A unique five-digit number assigned to each CCN when it is created and approved by the Commission. *CCN number starting with an ‘N’ indicates an exempt utility.UTILITY - The name of the utility which owns the CCN.COUNTY - The name(s) of the county(ies) in which the CCN exist.CCN_TYPE –One of three types:Bounded Service Area: A certificated service area with closed boundaries that often follow identifiable physical and cultural features such as roads, rivers, streams and political boundaries. Facilities +200 Feet: A certificated service area represented by lines. They include a buffer of a specified number of feet (usually 200 feet). The lines normally follow along roads and may or may not correspond to distribution lines or facilities in the ground.Facilities Only: A certificated service area represented by lines. They are granted for a "point of use" that covers only the customer connections at the time the CCN is granted. Facility only service lines normally follow along roads and may or may not correspond to distribution lines or facilities in the ground.STATUS – For pending dockets check the PUC Interchange Filing Search

Snapshot img

What is the GIS In Utility Industry Market Size?

The GIS market in the utility industry size is forecast to increase by USD 3.55 billion at a CAGR of 19.8% between 2023 and 2028. Market expansion hinges on various factors, such as the rising adoption of Geographic Information System (GIS) solutions in the utility sector, the convergence of GIS with Building Information Modeling, and the fusion of Augmented Reality with GIS technology. These elements collectively drive market growth, reflecting advancements in spatial data analytics and technological convergence. The increased adoption of GIS solutions in the utility industry underscores the importance of geospatial data in optimizing infrastructure management. Simultaneously, the integration of GIS with BIM signifies the synergy between spatial and building information for enhanced project planning and management. Additionally, the integration of AR with GIS technology highlights the potential for interactive and interactive visualization experiences in spatial data analysis. Thus, the interplay of these factors delineates the landscape for the anticipated expansion of the market catering to GIS and related technologies.

What will be the size of Market during the forecast period?

Request Free GIS In Utility Industry Market Sample

Market Segmentation

The market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019 - 2023 for the following segments.

Product

  Software
  Data
  Services


Deployment

  On-premises
  Cloud


Geography

  North America

    Canada
    US


  Europe

    Germany
    France


  APAC

    China
    India
    Japan


  Middle East and Africa



  South America

    Brazil

Which is the largest segment driving market growth?

The software segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period. In the utility industry, the spatial context of geographic information systems (GIS) plays a pivotal role in site selection, land acquisition, planning, designing, visualizing, building, and project management. Utilities, including electricity, gas, water, and telecommunications providers, leverage GIS software to efficiently manage their assets and infrastructure. This technology enables the collection, management, analysis, and visualization of geospatial data, derived from satellite imaging, aerial photography, remote sensors, and artificial intelligence. Geospatial AI, sensor technology, and digital reality solutions are integral components of GIS, enhancing capabilities for smart city planning, urban planning, water management, mapping systems, grid modernization, transportation, and green buildings.

Get a glance at the market share of various regions. Download the PDF Sample

The software segment was valued at USD 541.50 million in 2018. Moreover, the geospatial industry continues to evolve, with startups and software solutions driving innovation in hardware, smart city planning, land use management, smart infrastructure planning, and smart utilities. GIS solutions facilitate 4D visualization, enabling stakeholders to overcome geospatial data barriers and make informed decisions. The utility industry's reliance on GIS extends to building information modeling, augmented reality, and smart urban planning, ultimately contributing to the growth of the geospatial technology market.

Which region is leading the market?

For more insights on the market share of various regions, Request Free Sample

North America is estimated to contribute 37% to the growth of the global market during the forecast period. Technavio's analysts have elaborately explained the regional trends and drivers that shape the market during the forecast period.

How do company ranking index and market positioning come to your aid?

Companies are implementing various strategies, such as strategic alliances, partnerships, mergers and acquisitions, geographical expansion, and product/service launches, to enhance their presence in the market.

AABSyS IT Pvt. Ltd. - The company offers GIS solutions such as remote sensing and computer aided design and drafting solutions for electric and gas utility.

Technavio provides the ranking index for the top 20 companies along with insights on the market positioning of:

AABSyS IT Pvt. Ltd.
Autodesk Inc.
Avineon Inc.
Bentley Systems Inc.
Blue Marble Geographics
Cadcorp Ltd.
Caliper Corp.
Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc.
General Electric Co.
Hexagon AB
Mapbox Inc.
Maxar Technologies Inc.
Mobile GIS Services Ltd.
NV5 Global Inc.
Orbital Insight Inc.
Pitney Bowes Inc.
Schneider Electric SE
SuperMap Software Co. Ltd.
Trimble Inc.
VertiGIS Ltd.

Explore our company rankings and market positioning. Request Free Sample

How can Technavio assist you in ma

This online map contains utility infrastructure features published by the Natrona Regional Geospatial Cooperative (NRGC).

Map of the electric utility service areas in California.

This file contains planimetric basemap data of Westchester County, New York. The source for the data was aerial photography acquired in April 2004. This layer represents the ground location of utility poles, light poles and utility poles with light fixtures. The data was photogrammetrically stereo-compiled to North American Datum 1983; New York State Plane East Zone. Image horizontal accuracy is +/-2.5 ft. at the 90% confidence level.

In 2012, the CPUC ordered the development of a statewide map that is designed specifically for the purpose of identifying areas where there is an increased risk for utility associated wildfires. The development of the CPUC -sponsored fire-threat map, herein "CPUC Fire-Threat Map," started in R.08-11-005 and continued in R.15-05-006.

A multistep process was used to develop the statewide CPUC Fire-Threat Map. The first step was to develop Fire Map 1 (FM 1), an agnostic map which depicts areas of California where there is an elevated hazard for the ignition and rapid spread of powerline fires due to strong winds, abundant dry vegetation, and other environmental conditions. These are the environmental conditions associated with the catastrophic powerline fires that burned 334 square miles of Southern California in October 2007. FM 1 was developed by CAL FIRE and adopted by the CPUC in Decision 16-05-036.

FM 1 served as the foundation for the development of the final CPUC Fire-Threat Map. The CPUC Fire-Threat Map delineates, in part, the boundaries of a new High Fire-Threat District (HFTD) where utility infrastructure and operations will be subject to stricter fire‑safety regulations. Importantly, the CPUC Fire-Threat Map (1) incorporates the fire hazards associated with historical powerline wildfires besides the October 2007 fires in Southern California (e.g., the Butte Fire that burned 71,000 acres in Amador and Calaveras Counties in September 2015), and (2) ranks fire-threat areas based on the risks that utility-associated wildfires pose to people and property.

Primary responsibility for the development of the CPUC Fire-Threat Map was delegated to a group of utility mapping experts known as the Peer Development Panel (PDP), with oversight from a team of independent experts known as the Independent Review Team (IRT). The members of the IRT were selected by CAL FIRE and CAL FIRE served as the Chair of the IRT. The development of CPUC Fire-Threat Map includes input from many stakeholders, including investor-owned and publicly owned electric utilities, communications infrastructure providers, public interest groups, and local public safety agencies.

The PDP served a draft statewide CPUC Fire-Threat Map on July 31, 2017, which was subsequently reviewed by the IRT. On October 2 and October 5, 2017, the PDP filed an Initial CPUC Fire-Threat Map that reflected the results of the IRT's review through September 25, 2017. The final IRT-approved CPUC Fire-Threat Map was filed on November 17, 2017. On November 21, 2017, SED filed on behalf of the IRT a summary report detailing the production of the CPUC Fire-Threat Map(referenced at the time as Fire Map 2). Interested parties were provided opportunity to submit alternate maps, written comments on the IRT-approved map and alternate maps (if any), and motions for Evidentiary Hearings. No motions for Evidentiary Hearings or alternate map proposals were received. As such, on January 19, 2018 the CPUC adopted, via Safety and Enforcement Division's (SED) disposition of a Tier 1 Advice Letter, the final CPUC Fire-Threat Map.

Additional information can be found here.

This dataset shows electric utility service area boundaries for the State of Minnesota. The original source data were lines hand-drawn on county highway maps. The maps were scanned and georeferenced to serve as a background for on-screen digitizing. The utilities were then given an opportunity to review and correct the service areas. Changes filed with the Public Utilities Commission (eDockets) were also reviewed to update the areas. This version of the dataset reflects boundary changes through 12/01/15, as well as changes resulting from the transfer of Alliant Energy's service territories to 12 southern Minnesota cooperatives in early 2016.

The Underground Utilities Mapping Services market is projected to reach USD XXX million by 2033, exhibiting a CAGR of XX% during the forecast period. The market growth is primarily driven by rising concerns regarding public safety, the need for efficient infrastructure management, and the increasing implementation of trenchless technologies. Additionally, the growing adoption of geographic information systems (GIS) and advancements in sensing and mapping technologies are further bolstering market expansion. The market is segmented by application, type, and region. By application, the oil and gas segment currently holds the largest market share due to the need for accurate underground mapping to ensure the safety and reliability of pipelines and other infrastructure. The construction segment is also expected to witness significant growth due to the increasing use of mapping services for site planning, excavation, and construction monitoring. Geographically, North America is the largest market for underground utilities mapping services, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. The presence of stringent regulations governing underground infrastructure management and the high adoption of advanced technologies in these regions contributes to their dominance. Emerging markets such as China, India, and Brazil are also expected to experience robust growth in the coming years due to increasing infrastructure development and urbanization. Key players in the Underground Utilities Mapping Services market include Plowman Craven, Waterland Group, GEOTEC Surveys, Technics Group, multiVIEW Locates, Subscan Technology, Utility Mapping, LandScope, Powers Tiltman, Geoindo, Midland Survey, Utilimap Limited, Service Location Ltd, OmniSurveys, VAC Group, Cardno, Amber Utilities, Malcolm Hughes, Global Detection Services, Apex Surveys, Jurukur Perunding Services, and others. These companies are focusing on strategic partnerships, product innovations, and regional expansion to maintain their competitive edge in the market.

In 2012, the CPUC ordered the development of a statewide map that is designed specifically for the purpose of identifying areas where there is an increased risk for utility associated wildfires. The development of the CPUC -sponsored fire-threat map, herein "CPUC Fire-Threat Map," started in R.08-11-005 and continued in R.15-05-006.

A multistep process was used to develop the statewide CPUC Fire-Threat Map. The first step was to develop Fire Map 1 (FM 1), an agnostic map which depicts areas of California where there is an elevated hazard for the ignition and rapid spread of powerline fires due to strong winds, abundant dry vegetation, and other environmental conditions. These are the environmental conditions associated with the catastrophic powerline fires that burned 334 square miles of Southern California in October 2007. FM 1 was developed by CAL FIRE and adopted by the CPUC in Decision 16-05-036.

FM 1 served as the foundation for the development of the final CPUC Fire-Threat Map. The CPUC Fire-Threat Map delineates, in part, the boundaries of a new High Fire-Threat District (HFTD) where utility infrastructure and operations will be subject to stricter fire‑safety regulations. Importantly, the CPUC Fire-Threat Map (1) incorporates the fire hazards associated with historical powerline wildfires besides the October 2007 fires in Southern California (e.g., the Butte Fire that burned 71,000 acres in Amador and Calaveras Counties in September 2015), and (2) ranks fire-threat areas based on the risks that utility-associated wildfires pose to people and property.

Primary responsibility for the development of the CPUC Fire-Threat Map was delegated to a group of utility mapping experts known as the Peer Development Panel (PDP), with oversight from a team of independent experts known as the Independent Review Team (IRT). The members of the IRT were selected by CAL FIRE and CAL FIRE served as the Chair of the IRT. The development of CPUC Fire-Threat Map includes input from many stakeholders, including investor-owned and publicly owned electric utilities, communications infrastructure providers, public interest groups, and local public safety agencies.

The PDP served a draft statewide CPUC Fire-Threat Map on July 31, 2017, which was subsequently reviewed by the IRT. On October 2 and October 5, 2017, the PDP filed an Initial CPUC Fire-Threat Map that reflected the results of the IRT's review through September 25, 2017. The final IRT-approved CPUC Fire-Threat Map was filed on November 17, 2017. On November 21, 2017, SED filed on behalf of the IRT a summary report detailing the production of the CPUC Fire-Threat Map(referenced at the time as Fire Map 2). Interested parties were provided opportunity to submit alternate maps, written comments on the IRT-approved map and alternate maps (if any), and motions for Evidentiary Hearings. No motions for Evidentiary Hearings or alternate map proposals were received. As such, on January 19, 2018 the CPUC adopted, via Safety and Enforcement Division's (SED) disposition of a Tier 1 Advice Letter, the final CPUC Fire-Threat Map.

Additional information can be found here.

The polylines represent underground utilities such as cable TV, gas, oil, and telephone lines across various areas of Los Angeles County. All data were collected from LA County Substructure Grid Maps drawing. The utility lines are from cities that were contracted with LA County. To download the hardcopy maps, please visit: Los Angeles County Substructure Maps | County of Los Angeles Open Datahttps://egis-lacounty.hub.arcgis.com/maps/los-angeles-county-substructure-maps-1/explore?location=34.094631%2C-118.256950%2C7.82Every reasonable effort has been made to assure the accuracy of this data and the maps referenced. Some cities may provide substructure information for the areas not covered by our map grids. Additional and more accurate substructure data and information may also be obtained through the utility companies. The County of Los Angeles makes no warranty, representation, or guarantee as to the content, sequence, accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided herein or of any maps referenced. Los Angeles County Public Works recommends that all utility research be conducted under the supervision of a licensed civil engineer.

Energy and utilities data from the Alaska Energy Authority, Alaska Energy Data Gateway. Includes: - Hydroelectric - Hydrokinetic - Wind Power - Thermal Areas - Hot Springs - Sawmills - Energy Regions - Electric Utility Lines - TAPS Pipeline - Volanoes and Vents - Solar PowerSource: Alaska Energy AuthorityThis data is provided as a service in the DCRA Information Portal by the Alaska Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development Division of Community and Regional Affairs (SOA DCCED DCRA), Research and Analysis section. SOA DCCED DCRA Research and Analysis is not the authoritative source for this data. For more information and for questions about this data, see: Alaska Energy Data Gateway

Utility locations from 2012 desktop survey for regional public safety program. May not be inclusive.Explore all our data on the Cambridge GIS Data Dictionary.Attributes NameType DetailsDescription SITE_NAME type: Stringwidth: 50precision: 0 Name of utility at site

ADDRESS type: Stringwidth: 40precision: 0 Address of utility at site

TYPE type: Stringwidth: 40precision: 0 Type of utility

This feature class represents electric power retail service territories. These are areas serviced by electric power utilities responsible for the retail sale of electric power to local customers, whether residential, industrial, or commercial. The following updates have been made since the previous release: 7 features added, numerous geometries improved, and geographic coverage expanded to include American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, and Virgin Islands.

Polygon geometry with attributes displaying all electricity utility service areas in East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana. Information was gathered from the Louisiana Public Service Commission website at https://www.lpsc.louisiana.gov/Maps_Electric_Distribution_Areas.aspx and from the City-Parish Department of Transportation and Drainage.Metadata

The global subsurface utility mapping market size was valued at USD 2.2 billion in 2025 and is expected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.2% from 2025 to 2033, reaching USD 3.5 billion by 2033. The market growth is attributed to increasing urbanization and infrastructure development, which necessitates the accurate mapping of underground utilities to avoid damage during construction activities. Additionally, the growing adoption of advanced technologies, such as ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and laser scanning, is expected to drive market growth. The service segment held the largest market share in 2025 and is projected to maintain its dominance throughout the forecast period. This dominance is attributed to the increasing demand for outsourced subsurface utility mapping services by utility companies, construction contractors, and government agencies. The hardware segment is expected to witness significant growth due to the introduction of new and advanced technologies, such as GPR systems and laser scanners. These technologies provide accurate and detailed data about underground utilities, enabling better decision-making and reducing the risk of damage during construction activities. The software segment is also expected to grow at a steady pace, driven by the increasing adoption of GIS software for managing and analyzing subsurface utility data.