description: (Link to Metadata) CadastralParcels_VTPARCELS includes standardized parcel data for Vermont municipalities. For information on the Statewide Property Parcel Mapping Program, go to http://vcgi.vermont.gov/parcels.; abstract: (Link to Metadata) CadastralParcels_VTPARCELS includes standardized parcel data for Vermont municipalities. For information on the Statewide Property Parcel Mapping Program, go to http://vcgi.vermont.gov/parcels.
description: (Link to Metadata) CadastralParcels_VTPARCELS includes standardized parcel data for Vermont municipalities. For information on the Statewide Property Parcel Mapping Program, go to http://vcgi.vermont.gov/parcels.; abstract: (Link to Metadata) CadastralParcels_VTPARCELS includes standardized parcel data for Vermont municipalities. For information on the Statewide Property Parcel Mapping Program, go to http://vcgi.vermont.gov/parcels.
MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
THIS LAYER IS CURRENTLY BETA.This dataset provides approximate point locations and associated public information collected by the Department of Taxes under 32 V.S.A. § 9606 for all property transferred by deed in Vermont beginning in January 2019 through present. The layer is updated weekly. In addition to the data fields provided by the Department of Taxes, VCGI has added the latitude, longitude, standardized town name (based on the townCode), town GEOID, and Match Method (see below). Questions about property transfer data can be directed to the Department of Taxes at tax.rett@vermont.gov.Multiple methods are used to geocode property locations, indicated in the 'MatchMethod' field and prioritized in the following order:Geocoded using the VCGI ESITE Geocoder with the property street and city. MatchMethod = Property Address (ESITE). If unmatched:Match on SPAN in the E911 Site Locations layer; geocode using the location of the ESITE. MatchMethod = SPAN (ESITE). If unmatched:Geocode using the VCGI Composite Geocoder with the property street and city. MatchMethod = Property Address (Composite). If unmatched:Match on the SPAN in the Standardized Parcel Data layer; geocode based on a point located within the parcel polygon. While the point will fall within the correct parcel it may still be distant from the actual property, particularly in large parcels, and is less precise than the methods above. MatchMethod = SPAN (Parcel centroid).Locations are approximate, and those geocoded using the Property Address (Composite) and SPAN (Parcel centroid) methods in particular are less precise. Records that could not be geocoded using the above methods, often because of an incomplete, missing, or otherwise invalid SPAN and/or property address, are retained in the table but do not include geometry or coordinates. For these records, MatchMethod = Unmatched.Data download limitationVCGI recommends the use of feature services and geodatabase downloads when possible. Please note that if downloading the data as a shapefile the entries in the following fields may be truncated due to character limits:prTxExDesc (property tax exemption as described under32 V.S.A. § 9603)LGTExDesc (land gain exemption description)addSellNam (additional seller names from PTT175)addSellLoc (additional seller locations from PTT175)addBuyrNam (additional buyer names from PTT175)addBuyrLoc (additional buyer locations from PTT175)
MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
(Link to Metadata) CadastralParcels_VTPARCELS includes standardized parcel data--with joined Grand List data--for Vermont municipalities. For information on the Statewide Property Parcel Mapping Program, go to https://vcgi.vermont.gov/data-and-programs/parcel-program.
This dataset is the first attempt categorizing Vermont’s conserved lands following the definitions in Act 59, as interpreted by the Vermont Housing and Conservation Board and described in the Vermont Conservation Strategy Initiative Inventory Report (August 2024).Explore the Initial, Conserved Lands Inventory Dashboard to visualize and summarize the data submitted. The GIS data published originates from the Nature Conservancy’s 2022 Secured Areas Dataset; a compilation effort showing protected areas in 18 eastern states that are permanently protected from development. Using that product, the Conservation Categories Workgroup completed an exercise of categorizing the parcels into the three conservation categories identified in the CRPBA. The categorization was completed consistent with the interpretation and recommendations of the Conservation Categories Workgroup Report.After the categorization, the data was provided to ANR GIS to facilitate ArcGIS Online partner access and refreshing the data with acquisitions from May 2022 to 2024. A complete data refresh for the GMNF was done using a March 2024 version of their management areas dataset. For the ANR, newly acquired parcels were added and available land use classification mapping, associated with long-range management planning, was compiled and categorized by land managers and ecologists. The categorized land use mapping replaced existing mapping for units where it was available. VLT provided GIS data for newly acquired lands between May 2022 and May 2024. TNC updated primary stewarded parcels prior to exchanging data with ANR GIS. Efforts to add other stewarded parcels were not attempted.
Category Definitions:
1) “Ecological reserve area” means an area having permanent protection from conversion and that is managed to maintain a natural state within which natural ecological processes and disturbance events are allowed to proceed with minimal interference.
(2) “Biodiversity conservation area” means an area having permanent protection from conversion for the majority of the area and that is managed for the primary goal of sustaining species or habitats. These areas may include regular, active interventions to address the needs of particular species or to maintain or restore habitats.
(3) “Natural resource management area” means an area having permanent protection from conversion for the majority of the area but that is subject to long-term, sustainable land management.
Lands categorized as Ecological Reserve Area and Biodiversity Conservation Area are consistent with the interpretation and recommendations of the Conservation Categories Workgroup Report and were categorized by staff at VT TNC and VT FWD. The Uncategorized Conserved Lands are lands identified as Gap 4 in TNC’s Secured Lands Database. These lands will be further reviewed and considered in Phase II of the CRBPA effort. Lands categorized as Natural Resource Management Areas are lands that did not meet the criteria of an Ecological Reserve Area or a Biodiversity Conservation Area, and that were not identified as Gap 4 in the Secured Lands Database.
Additional near term development:
Stewarded layer views of the initial public release are still accessible to VLT, TNC, GMNF and ANR staff to manage or recategorize until September 1, 2024. At that time, the initial Conserved Lands Inventory will be a static product to serve as a baseline for the conservation vision and goals of the CRPBA.
This TNC Lands spatial dataset represents the lands and waters in which The Nature Conservancy (TNC) currently has, or historically had, an interest, legal or otherwise in Vermont. The system of record for TNC Lands is the Legal Records Management (LRM) system, which is TNC’s database for all TNC land transactions.TNC properties should not be considered open to the public unless specifically designated as being so. TNC may change the access status at any time at its sole discretion. It's recommended to visit preserve-specific websites or contact the organization operating the preserve before any planned visit for the latest conditions, notices, and closures. TNC prohibits redistribution or display of the data in maps or online in any way that misleadingly implies such lands are universally open to the public.The types of current land interests represented in the TNC Lands data include: Fields and Attributes included in the public dataset:Field NameField DefinitionAttributesAttribute Definitions Public NameThe name of the tract that The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Business Unit (BU) uses for public audiences.Public name of tract if applicableN/A TNC Primary InterestThe primary interest held by The Nature Conservancy (TNC) on the tractFee OwnershipProperties where TNC currently holds fee-title or exclusive rights and control over real estate. Fee Ownership can include TNC Nature Preserves, managed areas, and properties that are held for future transfer. Conservation EasementProperties on which TNC holds a conservation easement, which is a legally binding agreement restricting the use of real property for conservation purposes (e.g., no development). The easement may additionally provide the holder (TNC) with affirmative rights, such as the rights to monitor species or to manage the land. It may run forever or for an expressed term of years. Deed RestrictionProperties where TNC holds a deed restriction, which is a provision placed in a deed restricting or limiting the use of the property in some manner (e.g., if a property goes up for sale, TNC gets the first option). TransferProperties where TNC historically had a legal interest (fee or easement), then subsequently transferred the interest to a conservation partner. AssistProperties where TNC assisted another agency/entity in protecting. Management Lease or AgreementAn agreement between two parties whereby one party allows the other to use their property for a certain period of time in exchange for a periodic fee. Grazing Lease or PermitA grazing lease or permit held by The Nature Conservancy Right of WayAn access easement or agreement held by The Nature Conservancy. OtherAnother real estate interest or legal agreement held by The Nature Conservancy Fee OwnerThe name of the organization serving as fee owner of the tract, or "Private Land Owner" if the owner is a private party. If The Nature Conservancy (TNC) primary interest is a "Transfer" or "Assist", then this is the fee owner at the time of the transaction.Fee Owner NameN/A Fee Org TypeThe type of organization(s) that hold(s) fee ownership. Chosen from a list of accepted values.Organization Types for Fee OwnershipFED:Federal, TRIB:American Indian Lands, STAT:State,DIST:Regional Agency Special District, LOC:Local Government, NGO:Non-Governmental Organization, PVT:Private, JNT:Joint, UNK:Unknown, TERR:Territorial, DESG:Designation Other Interest HolderThe name of the organization(s) that hold(s) a different interest in the tract, besides fee ownership or TNC Primary Interest. This may include TNC if the Other Interest is held or co-held by TNC. Multiple interest holders should be separated by a semicolon (;).Other Interest Holder NameN/A Other Interest Org TypeThe type of organization(s) that hold(s) a different interest in the tract, besides fee ownership. This may include TNC if the Other Interest is held or co-held by TNC. Chosen from a list of accepted values.Organization Types for interest holders:FED:Federal, TRIB:American Indian Lands, STAT:State,DIST:Regional Agency Special District, LOC:Local Government, NGO:Non-Governmental Organization, PVT:Private, JNT:Joint, UNK:Unknown, TERR:Territorial, DESG:Designation Other Interest TypeThe other interest type held on the tract. Chosen from a list of accepted values.Access Right of Way; Conservation Easement; Co-held Conservation Easement; Deed Restriction; Co-held Deed Restriction; Fee Ownership; Co-held Fee Ownership; Grazing Lease or Permit; Life Estate; Management Lease or Agreement; Timber Lease or Agreement; OtherN/A Preserve NameThe name of The Nature Conservancy (TNC) preserve that the tract is a part of, this may be the same name as the as the "Public Name" for the tract.Preserve Name if applicableN/APublic AccessThe level of public access allowed on the tract.Open AccessAccess is encouraged on the tract, trails are maintained, signage is abundant, and parking is available. The tract may include regular hours of availability.Open with Limited AccessThere are no special requirements for public access to the tract, the tract may include regular hours of availability with limited amenities.Restricted AccessThe tract requires a special permit from the owner for access, a registration permit on public land, or has highly variable times or conditions to use.Closed AccessNo public access is allowed on the tract.UnknownAccess information for the tract is not currently available.Gap CategoryThe Gap Analysis Project (GAP) code for the tract. Gap Analysis is the science of determining how well we are protecting common plants and animals. Developing the data and tools to support that science is the mission of the Gap Analysis Project (GAP) at the US Geological Survey. See their website for more information, linked in the field name.1 - Permanent Protection for BiodiversityPermanent Protection for Biodiversity2 - Permanent Protection to Maintain a Primarily Natural StatePermanent Protection to Maintain a Primarily Natural State3 - Permanently Secured for Multiple Uses and in natural coverPermanently Secured for Multiple Uses and in natural cover39 - Permanently Secured and in agriculture or maintained grass coverPermanently Secured and in agriculture or maintained grass cover4 - UnsecuredUnsecured (temporary easements lands and/or municipal lands that are already developed (schools, golf course, soccer fields, ball fields)9 - UnknownUnknownProtected AcresThe planar area of the tract polygon in acres, calculated by the TNC Lands geographic information system (GIS).Total geodesic area of polygon in acresProjection: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary SphereOriginal Protection DateThe original protection date for the tract, from the Land Resource Management (LRM) system record.Original protection dateN/AStateThe state within the United States of America or the Canadian province where the tract is located.Chosen from a list of state names.N/ACountryThe name of the country where the tract is located.Chosen from a list of countries.N/ADivisionThe name of the TNC North America Region Division where the tract is located. Chosen from a list of TNC North America DivisionsN/A
description: (Link to Metadata) Large ownerships were identified and verified through a variety of sources.; abstract: (Link to Metadata) Large ownerships were identified and verified through a variety of sources.
MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
Feature layer of locations corresponding to surveys that are produced by Vermont licensed land surveyors and submitted—as .pdf copies—to the Vermont Land Survey Library.Locations are attributed with information such as name of surveyor, date of survey, survey type (e.g., subdivision), and municipality. When the feature layer is opened in ArcGIS Online, the .pdf copies (as feature attachments) can be viewed/downloaded.Effective January 1, 2020 and as stated in27 V.S.A. § 341, surveys are required for property line changes in Vermont. Licensed land surveyors who produce the surveys are to submit a digital copy of them to the library in.pdf format (see27 V.S.A. §1401 and 27 V.S.A. §1403).The copies of surveys are for public reference only, with the originals that most often reside with the Municipality remaining the official documents. The purpose of the land survey library is to improve knowledge of who owns what lands where throughout Vermont.For more information about land surveying in Vermont, see theVermont Society of Land Surveyors (VSLS) and the Vermont Survey Law Manual (PDF).
The State of Vermont has a long history of acquiring properties for conservation and recreation purposes. Since the first official state forest (L.R. Jones State Forest) was acquired in 1909, the State has acquired over 345,000 acres of land in more than 200 towns across the state. In addition, the Agency has recently acquired conservation easements on over 44,000 acres of privately-owned forest land. These diverse holdings are managed by the Agency of Natural Resources and include state parks, state forests, wildlife management areas, and fishing access areas, pond sites, streambanks, fish culture stations, dams, and other miscellanious properties.
(Link to Metadata) The EcologicOther_ELT (Ecological Land Type) data layer was developed by the Green Mountain National Forest in the early 1980's from aerial photography. Using stereo-pairs of 1:42000 aerial photographs units were mapped using techniques similar to those used by soil scientists to delineate soil-series. After the initial mapping, fieldwork was done to 1) verify and adjust unit designations and 2) develop unit descriptions. To do this, sample plots were established on photos in locations that appeared to be representative of particular ELT's, or in locations where there were questions about the accuracy of the designations. Adjustments to the ELT boundaries were made in the field when data on vegetation and edaphic and topographic features were collected at sample plots. On the north half of the Green Mountain National Forest, 60 different elts have been mapped, and 320 sample plots established to validate and describe the units. Polygons were drawn onto 1:24000 USFS Topographic Maps sheets (mylar). In 1993 these maps were given to the University of Vermont's Spatial Analysis Lab for digitizing. Automation was completed in the fall of 1993. Ecological land classification (ELC) is a cartographic approach to forest land delineation that defines units of land at different spatial scales that are hierarchical, nested, and homogeneous in their environmental and late-successional vegetational characteristics. The ecological land classification system in use on the Green Mountain National Forest (GMNF) in Vermont conforms to the guidelines defined by the National Hierarchical Framework of Ecological Units established by the USDA Forest Service. This classification system is meant to assist managers by allowing them to delineate ecosystems, assess resources, conduct environmental analyses, establish desired future conditions, and manage and monitor resources. Units at the ecological land type (ELT) scale have been mapped on the GMNF. These units are designed to assist managers in site specific, project-level planning. Average unit size for ELT's on the north half of the GMNF is 267 acres. The units are identified by a four-digit code that is based on landtype association, geomorphic process, soil depth, and moisture (refer to ELTCODE documentation).
The main purposes of this online map are 1. to demonstrate the Web-Based Geographic Information System (GIS) in the District of Columbia Office of Tax and Revenue (OTR) Real Property Tax Administration (RPTA), and 2. to share detailed real property data and information to real property owners, the public, and other government entities. The rich map and interactive application include relevant real property valuation contributing map layers, links to original source agencies, and a variety of search, query, and analysis options to meet the needs of a wide user base. The location and links to the original DC Boundary Stones add a fun, historical,and educational component.The Office of the Chief Financial Officer, DC Office of Tax and Revenue (OTR), Real Property Assessment Division values all real property in the District of Columbia. The public interactive online DC Office of Tax and Revenue Real Property Assessment Lot Map Search application accompanies the OTR Tax Payer Service Center and may be used to search for and view all real property, related assessment areas, assessment data, and detailed assessment information.
MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
(Link to Metadata) A parcel of Forest Service land congressionally designated as wilderness such as National Wilderness Area.
description:
This file, along with two others, was created to produce a new, official zoning map series for the Town of Dover, Vermont in 2007. This file represents the base zoning districts. Overlay districts are in separate files. The zoning bylaw was adopted in March 2007, and was amended on March 3, 2013. The zoning district boundaries did not change with this amendment, and thus these boundaries remain current. The zoning districts are represented in three files: this file of town-wide zoning districts, and files representing two overlay districts (Transfer of Development zones and Sensitive Wildlife Areas) overlay). Boundaries coincide in most cases with existing parcel boundaries, or are lines connecting corners or intersections of these parcel lines. Other district boundaries coincide with other features, such as the 2500-foot contour, while a few others are somewhat arbitrary. Whenever possible, lines from existing GIS data were used to create these zoning district boundaries. In most cases, these data include Dover's parcel data and 20-foot contours generated by Cartographic Technologies, Inc., or previous zoning data from Grass Roots GIS.
This file, along with two others, was created to produce a new, official zoning map series for the Town of Dover, Vermont in 2007. This file represents the base zoning districts. Overlay districts are in separate files. The zoning bylaw was adopted in March 2007, and was amended on March 3, 2013. The zoning district boundaries did not change with this amendment, and thus these boundaries remain current. The zoning districts are represented in three files: this file of town-wide zoning districts, and files representing two overlay districts (Transfer of Development zones and Sensitive Wildlife Areas) overlay). Boundaries coincide in most cases with existing parcel boundaries, or are lines connecting corners or intersections of these parcel lines. Other district boundaries coincide with other features, such as the 2500-foot contour, while a few others are somewhat arbitrary. Whenever possible, lines from existing GIS data were used to create these zoning district boundaries. In most cases, these data include Dover's parcel data and 20-foot contours generated by Cartographic Technologies, Inc., or previous zoning data from Grass Roots GIS.
MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
(Link to Metadata) High resolution land cover dataset for Vermont. Eight land cover classes were mapped: (1) tree canopy, (2) grass/shrub, (3) bare earth, (4) water, (5) buildings, (6) roads, (7) other paved surfaces,and (8) railroads. The primary sources used to derive this land cover layer were 2013-2017 LiDAR data and 2016 NAIP imagery. Ancillary data sources included GIS data provided by the State of Vermont or created by the UVM Spatial Analysis Laboratory. Object-based image analysis techniques (OBIA) were employed to extract land cover information using the best available remotely sensed and vector GIS datasets. OBIA systems work by grouping pixels into meaningful objects based on their spectral and spatial properties, while taking into account boundaries imposed by existing vector datasets. Within the OBIA environment a rule-based expert system was designed to effectively mimic the process of manual image analysis by incorporating the elements of image interpretation (color/tone, texture, pattern, location, size, and shape) into the classification process. A series of morphological procedures were employed to insure that the end product is both accurate and cartographically pleasing. Following the automated OBIA mapping a detailed manual review of the dataset was carried out at a scale of 1:3000 and all observable errors were corrected.
Surficial geologic maps of Vermont are available for 7.5 minute and 15 minute quadrangles . The maps include materials, landforms, cross-sections, and some include depth to bedrock information. Digital protocols are under development as of 6-25-99. Raw data for the depth to bedrock analysis is available as a dataset based on water well locations, well drillers reports, and transportation borings.
In the Northwest Regional Plan the Proposed Land Use map has the following planning areas:· Regional Growth Area· Sub-Regional Growth Area· Transitional Growth Area· Agricultural Resource Planning Area· Conservation & Forest Resource Planning Area· Rural Planning Area in the Northwest Regional Plan. In addition, the NRPC has identified villages & hamlets. This Regional Plan was adopted on 7/26/2023. For more information: https://www.nrpcvt.com/regional-planning.
MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
(Link to Metadata) CadastralParcels_VTPARCELS includes standardized parcel data--with joined Grand List data--for Vermont municipalities. For information on the Statewide Property Parcel Mapping Program, go to https://vcgi.vermont.gov/data-and-programs/parcel-program.
A polygon feature class of all properties within Miami-Dade County that includes property appraiser data.Updated: Weekly-Sat The data was created using: Projected Coordinate System: WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_SphereProjection: Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere
This shapefile contains the zoning district boundaries for the Town of Newfane, Vt., and is to be used in conjunction with other GIS data for mapping. Most of these boundaries coincide with either existing parcel lines or with roads and streams. In this shapefile, the district boundaries were made to coincide with GIS representations of roads and streams where the proposed zoning district boundaries coincide with such features, but not parcel lines. No GIS parcel data for Newfane existed at the time of this shapefile was created, so scans of paper tax maps developed on an unrectified photo base were used. The zoning district boundaries that coincide with parcel boundaries are only approximate. The zoning district boundaries, where they coincide with roads or streams are accurate to the acccuracy of the GIS data representation of those features, but where district boundaries coincide with parcel boundaries, the district boundaries will likely be off by 200 to 500 feet, or more in some areas. As such, these data should be used only in map form to give a general overally impression of the zoning district boundaries for the Town of Newfane, but cannot be used to determine actual zoning district boundaries in any locations other than where these districts coincide with roads or streams. The shapefile Newfane\zoning_prop_taxmap.shp has been created to show the relationship with zoning district boundaries and parcel lines as represented on a series of scanned tax map images. For a more accurate depiction of the Village zoning districts (Newfane, South Newfane, and Williamsville) in relation to the scanned tax map images, see the shapefile Newfane\zoning_prop_village.shp.Data were created in September 2008 but are current to the most recent zoning bylaw amendment of February 19, 2015.
Effective: August 19, 2020 https://www.trorc.org/trorc-regional-plan/ The Two Rivers-Ottauquechee Regional Commission's Regional Plan is used in Act 250 and Section 248 (energy) review of projects, as well as for review of town plans, upon request of a municipality. https://www.trorc.org/member-towns/ VIEW WEBMAP.
description: (Link to Metadata) CadastralParcels_VTPARCELS includes standardized parcel data for Vermont municipalities. For information on the Statewide Property Parcel Mapping Program, go to http://vcgi.vermont.gov/parcels.; abstract: (Link to Metadata) CadastralParcels_VTPARCELS includes standardized parcel data for Vermont municipalities. For information on the Statewide Property Parcel Mapping Program, go to http://vcgi.vermont.gov/parcels.