2 datasets found
  1. f

    Matching results using the indirect stepwise algorithm, validated on...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 31, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Yimei Li; Matt Hall; Brian T. Fisher; Alix E. Seif; Yuan-Shung Huang; Rochelle Bagatell; Kelly D. Getz; Todd A. Alonzo; Robert B. Gerbing; Lillian Sung; Peter C. Adamson; Alan Gamis; Richard Aplenc (2023). Matching results using the indirect stepwise algorithm, validated on AAML1031. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143480.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Unique identifier
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143480.t004
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Yimei Li; Matt Hall; Brian T. Fisher; Alix E. Seif; Yuan-Shung Huang; Rochelle Bagatell; Kelly D. Getz; Todd A. Alonzo; Robert B. Gerbing; Lillian Sung; Peter C. Adamson; Alan Gamis; Richard Aplenc
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description
    • Criterion 1 considers a match as discordant, if the indirect algorithm yielded a unique match but the direct merge method yielded duplicate matches.** Criterion 2 considers a match as concordant, if the indirect algorithm yielded a unique match but the direct merge method yielded duplicate matches, and the match in the indirect merge method was among one of the duplicate matches in the direct merge method.Note: The number of unique match from the direct merge method was 151 (91.5%).
  2. f

    Matching results using the indirect stepwise algorithm, developed on...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 6, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Yimei Li; Matt Hall; Brian T. Fisher; Alix E. Seif; Yuan-Shung Huang; Rochelle Bagatell; Kelly D. Getz; Todd A. Alonzo; Robert B. Gerbing; Lillian Sung; Peter C. Adamson; Alan Gamis; Richard Aplenc (2023). Matching results using the indirect stepwise algorithm, developed on AAML0531. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143480.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Unique identifier
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143480.t003
    Dataset updated
    Jun 6, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Yimei Li; Matt Hall; Brian T. Fisher; Alix E. Seif; Yuan-Shung Huang; Rochelle Bagatell; Kelly D. Getz; Todd A. Alonzo; Robert B. Gerbing; Lillian Sung; Peter C. Adamson; Alan Gamis; Richard Aplenc
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description
    • Criterion 1 considers a match as discordant, if the indirect algorithm yielded a unique match but the direct merge method yielded duplicate matches.** Criterion 2 considers a match as concordant, if the indirect algorithm yielded a unique match but the direct merge method yielded duplicate matches, and the match in the indirect merge method was among one of the duplicate matches in the direct merge method.Note: The number of unique match from the direct merge method was 383 (92.3%).

  3. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Yimei Li; Matt Hall; Brian T. Fisher; Alix E. Seif; Yuan-Shung Huang; Rochelle Bagatell; Kelly D. Getz; Todd A. Alonzo; Robert B. Gerbing; Lillian Sung; Peter C. Adamson; Alan Gamis; Richard Aplenc (2023). Matching results using the indirect stepwise algorithm, validated on AAML1031. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143480.t004

Matching results using the indirect stepwise algorithm, validated on AAML1031.

Related Article
Explore at:
xlsAvailable download formats
Unique identifier
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143480.t004
Dataset updated
May 31, 2023
Dataset provided by
PLOS ONE
Authors
Yimei Li; Matt Hall; Brian T. Fisher; Alix E. Seif; Yuan-Shung Huang; Rochelle Bagatell; Kelly D. Getz; Todd A. Alonzo; Robert B. Gerbing; Lillian Sung; Peter C. Adamson; Alan Gamis; Richard Aplenc
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description
  • Criterion 1 considers a match as discordant, if the indirect algorithm yielded a unique match but the direct merge method yielded duplicate matches.** Criterion 2 considers a match as concordant, if the indirect algorithm yielded a unique match but the direct merge method yielded duplicate matches, and the match in the indirect merge method was among one of the duplicate matches in the direct merge method.Note: The number of unique match from the direct merge method was 151 (91.5%).
Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu