- T
Peer Cities Table V3
- datahub.austintexas.gov
- data.austintexas.gov
- +1more
application/rdfxml +5Updated May 27, 2025
Share
Facebook
Twitter
EmailClick to copy linkLink copiedCitePARD Planning and Development (2025). Peer Cities Table V3 [Dataset]. https://datahub.austintexas.gov/Recreation-and-Culture/HE-C-2-Peer-Cities-Table-V3/8hvn-wht8json, xml, csv, tsv, application/rssxml, application/rdfxmlAvailable download formatsDataset updatedMay 27, 2025Dataset authored and provided byPARD Planning and DevelopmentLicenseU.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automaticallyDescriptionPARD’s Long Range Plan for Land, Facilities and Programs, Our Parks, Our Future (adopted November 2019) compared Austin’s park system to five peer cities: Atlanta, GA, Dallas, TX, Portland, OR, San Antonio, TX, and San Diego, CA. The peer cities were selected based on characteristics such as population, size, density, and governance type. Portland and San Diego were selected as aspirational cities known for their park systems.
Note that the table below presents each scoring area’s 1 to 100 index, where 100 is the highest possible score.
- g
HE.C.2 Peer Cities Table V3 | gimi9.com
- gimi9.com
ShareFacebookTwitterEmailClick to copy linkLink copiedCiteHE.C.2 Peer Cities Table V3 | gimi9.com [Dataset]. https://gimi9.com/dataset/data-gov_he-c-2-peer-cities-table-v3/DescriptionPARD’s Long Range Plan for Land, Facilities and Programs, Our Parks, Our Future (adopted November 2019) compared Austin’s park system to five peer cities: Atlanta, GA, Dallas, TX, Portland, OR, San Antonio, TX, and San Diego, CA. The peer cities were selected based on characteristics such as population, size, density, and governance type. Portland and San Diego were selected as aspirational cities known for their park systems. Note that the table below presents each scoring area’s 1 to 100 index, where 100 is the highest possible score.
- d
HE.C.2 Peer Cities Table V3
- datasets.ai
23, 40, 55, 8Updated Sep 18, 2024ShareFacebookTwitterEmailClick to copy linkLink copiedCiteCity of Austin (2024). HE.C.2 Peer Cities Table V3 [Dataset]. https://datasets.ai/datasets/he-c-2-peer-cities-table-v323, 40, 8, 55Available download formatsDataset updatedSep 18, 2024Dataset authored and provided byCity of AustinDescriptionPARD’s Long Range Plan for Land, Facilities and Programs, Our Parks, Our Future (adopted November 2019) compared Austin’s park system to five peer cities: Atlanta, GA, Dallas, TX, Portland, OR, San Antonio, TX, and San Diego, CA. The peer cities were selected based on characteristics such as population, size, density, and governance type. Portland and San Diego were selected as aspirational cities known for their park systems.
Note that the table below presents each scoring area’s 1 to 100 index, where 100 is the highest possible score.
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
FacebookTwitterEmailU.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
PARD’s Long Range Plan for Land, Facilities and Programs, Our Parks, Our Future (adopted November 2019) compared Austin’s park system to five peer cities: Atlanta, GA, Dallas, TX, Portland, OR, San Antonio, TX, and San Diego, CA. The peer cities were selected based on characteristics such as population, size, density, and governance type. Portland and San Diego were selected as aspirational cities known for their park systems.
Note that the table below presents each scoring area’s 1 to 100 index, where 100 is the highest possible score.