47 datasets found
  1. Web tracking data for 500 websites popular among Finnish web users

    • zenodo.org
    Updated Apr 18, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    John Bailey; Mikael Laakso; Mikael Laakso; Linus Nyman; Linus Nyman; John Bailey (2020). Web tracking data for 500 websites popular among Finnish web users [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3543444
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 18, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    John Bailey; Mikael Laakso; Mikael Laakso; Linus Nyman; Linus Nyman; John Bailey
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset includes observations of trackers present on the top 500 pages popular among Finnish web users as per Alexa. The data collection was conducted using TrackerTracker in five separate requests for five subsets of 100 sites each between 19.8.2017 and 20.8.2017. The tool used a tracker database from March 24, 2017. More methodology details are described in the associated journal article https://doi.org/10.23978/inf.87841

  2. history.com Website Traffic, Ranking, Analytics [July 2025]

    • semrush.com
    Updated Aug 12, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Semrush (2025). history.com Website Traffic, Ranking, Analytics [July 2025] [Dataset]. https://www.semrush.com/website/history.com/overview/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 12, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Semrushhttps://fr.semrush.com/
    License

    https://www.semrush.com/company/legal/terms-of-service/https://www.semrush.com/company/legal/terms-of-service/

    Time period covered
    Aug 12, 2025
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Variables measured
    visits, backlinks, bounceRate, pagesPerVisit, authorityScore, organicKeywords, avgVisitDuration, referringDomains, trafficByCountry, paidSearchTraffic, and 3 more
    Measurement technique
    Semrush Traffic Analytics; Click-stream data
    Description

    history.com is ranked #1765 in US with 7.03M Traffic. Categories: . Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

  3. A web tracking data set of online browsing behavior of 2,148 users

    • zenodo.org
    • explore.openaire.eu
    • +1more
    application/gzip, txt +1
    Updated May 14, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Juhi Kulshrestha; Juhi Kulshrestha; Marcos Oliveira; Marcos Oliveira; Orkut Karacalik; Denis Bonnay; Claudia Wagner; Orkut Karacalik; Denis Bonnay; Claudia Wagner (2021). A web tracking data set of online browsing behavior of 2,148 users [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4757574
    Explore at:
    zip, txt, application/gzipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 14, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Juhi Kulshrestha; Juhi Kulshrestha; Marcos Oliveira; Marcos Oliveira; Orkut Karacalik; Denis Bonnay; Claudia Wagner; Orkut Karacalik; Denis Bonnay; Claudia Wagner
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This anonymized data set consists of one month's (October 2018) web tracking data of 2,148 German users. For each user, the data contains the anonymized URL of the webpage the user visited, the domain of the webpage, category of the domain, which provides 41 distinct categories. In total, these 2,148 users made 9,151,243 URL visits, spanning 49,918 unique domains. For each user in our data set, we have self-reported information (collected via a survey) about their gender and age.

    We acknowledge the support of Respondi AG, which provided the web tracking and survey data free of charge for research purposes, with special thanks to François Erner and Luc Kalaora at Respondi for their insights and help with data extraction.

    The data set is analyzed in the following paper:

    • Kulshrestha, J., Oliveira, M., Karacalik, O., Bonnay, D., Wagner, C. "Web Routineness and Limits of Predictability: Investigating Demographic and Behavioral Differences Using Web Tracking Data." Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.15112.

    The code used to analyze the data is also available at https://github.com/gesiscss/web_tracking.

    If you use data or code from this repository, please cite the paper above and the Zenodo link.

  4. d

    Most popular websites in the Netherlands 2015 - Dataset - B2FIND

    • b2find.dkrz.de
    • b2find.eudat.eu
    Updated Jun 2, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2017). Most popular websites in the Netherlands 2015 - Dataset - B2FIND [Dataset]. https://b2find.dkrz.de/dataset/6537d0dd-cd8c-5cad-b0a3-edb10f4f1c8b
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2017
    Area covered
    Netherlands
    Description

    This dataset contains a list of 3654 Dutch websites that we considered the most popular websites in 2015. This list served as whitelist for the Newstracker Research project in which we monitored the online web behaviour of a group of respondents.The research project 'The Newstracker' was a subproject of the NWO-funded project 'The New News Consumer: A User-Based Innovation Project to Meet Paradigmatic Change in News Use and Media Habits'.For the Newstracker project we aimed to understand the web behaviour of a group of respondents. We created custom-built software to monitor their web browsing behaviour on their laptops and desktops (please find the code in open access at https://github.com/NITechLabs/NewsTracker). For reasons of scale and privacy we created a whitelist with websites that were the most popular websites in 2015. We manually compiled this list by using data of DDMM, Alexa and own research. The dataset consists of 5 columns:- the URL- the type of website: We created a list of types of websites and each website has been manually labeled with 1 category- Nieuws-regio: When the category was 'News', we subdivided these websites in the regional focus: International, National or Local- Nieuws-onderwerp: Furthermore, each website under the category News was further subdivided in type of news website. For this we created an own list of news categories and manually coded each website- Bron: For each website we noted which source we used to find this website.The full description of the research design of the Newstracker including the set-up of this whitelist is included in the following article: Kleppe, M., Otte, M. (in print), 'Analysing & understanding news consumption patterns by tracking online user behaviour with a multimodal research design', Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, doi 10.1093/llc/fqx030.

  5. Total global visitor traffic to Wikipedia.org 2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Nov 11, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Total global visitor traffic to Wikipedia.org 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1259907/wikipedia-website-traffic/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 11, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Oct 2023 - Mar 2024
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    In March 2024, close to 4.4 billion unique global visitors had visited Wikipedia.org, slightly down from 4.4 billion visitors since August of the same year. Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia with articles generated by volunteers worldwide. The platform is hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation.

  6. amazon.com Website Traffic, Ranking, Analytics [July 2025]

    • semrush.com
    • stb2.digiseotools.com
    Updated Aug 12, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Semrush (2025). amazon.com Website Traffic, Ranking, Analytics [July 2025] [Dataset]. https://www.semrush.com/website/amazon.com/overview/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 12, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Semrushhttps://fr.semrush.com/
    License

    https://www.semrush.com/company/legal/terms-of-service/https://www.semrush.com/company/legal/terms-of-service/

    Time period covered
    Aug 12, 2025
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Variables measured
    visits, backlinks, bounceRate, pagesPerVisit, authorityScore, organicKeywords, avgVisitDuration, referringDomains, trafficByCountry, paidSearchTraffic, and 3 more
    Measurement technique
    Semrush Traffic Analytics; Click-stream data
    Description

    amazon.com is ranked #3 in US with 2.82B Traffic. Categories: Online Services. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

  7. Share of global mobile website traffic 2015-2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Jan 28, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Share of global mobile website traffic 2015-2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/277125/share-of-website-traffic-coming-from-mobile-devices/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 28, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    Mobile accounts for approximately half of web traffic worldwide. In the last quarter of 2024, mobile devices (excluding tablets) generated 62.54 percent of global website traffic. Mobiles and smartphones consistently hoovered around the 50 percent mark since the beginning of 2017, before surpassing it in 2020. Mobile traffic Due to low infrastructure and financial restraints, many emerging digital markets skipped the desktop internet phase entirely and moved straight onto mobile internet via smartphone and tablet devices. India is a prime example of a market with a significant mobile-first online population. Other countries with a significant share of mobile internet traffic include Nigeria, Ghana and Kenya. In most African markets, mobile accounts for more than half of the web traffic. By contrast, mobile only makes up around 45.49 percent of online traffic in the United States. Mobile usage The most popular mobile internet activities worldwide include watching movies or videos online, e-mail usage and accessing social media. Apps are a very popular way to watch video on the go and the most-downloaded entertainment apps in the Apple App Store are Netflix, Tencent Video and Amazon Prime Video.

  8. tracker.co.za Website Traffic, Ranking, Analytics [July 2025]

    • semtest.toolsnovintrend.ir
    • stb2.digiseotools.com
    Updated Aug 11, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Semrush (2025). tracker.co.za Website Traffic, Ranking, Analytics [July 2025] [Dataset]. https://semtest.toolsnovintrend.ir/website/tracker.co.za/overview/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 11, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Semrushhttps://fr.semrush.com/
    License

    https://semtest.toolsnovintrend.ir/company/legal/terms-of-service/https://semtest.toolsnovintrend.ir/company/legal/terms-of-service/

    Time period covered
    Aug 11, 2025
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Variables measured
    visits, backlinks, bounceRate, pagesPerVisit, authorityScore, organicKeywords, avgVisitDuration, referringDomains, trafficByCountry, paidSearchTraffic, and 3 more
    Measurement technique
    Semrush Traffic Analytics; Click-stream data
    Description

    tracker.co.za is ranked #1417 in ZA with 193.15K Traffic. Categories: Information Technology. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

  9. Data from: Improving the efficacy of web-based educational outreach in...

    • zenodo.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • +1more
    csv, txt
    Updated Jun 1, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gregory R. Goldsmith; Andrew D. Fulton; Colin D. Witherill; Javier F. Espeleta; Gregory R. Goldsmith; Andrew D. Fulton; Colin D. Witherill; Javier F. Espeleta (2022). Data from: Improving the efficacy of web-based educational outreach in ecology [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.94nk8
    Explore at:
    csv, txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Gregory R. Goldsmith; Andrew D. Fulton; Colin D. Witherill; Javier F. Espeleta; Gregory R. Goldsmith; Andrew D. Fulton; Colin D. Witherill; Javier F. Espeleta
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Scientists are increasingly engaging the web to provide formal and informal science education opportunities. Despite the prolific growth of web-based resources, systematic evaluation and assessment of their efficacy remains limited. We used clickstream analytics, a widely available method for tracking website visitors and their behavior, to evaluate >60,000 visits over three years to an educational website focused on ecology. Visits originating from search engine queries were a small proportion of the traffic, suggesting the need to actively promote websites to drive visitation. However, the number of visits referred to the website per social media post varied depending on the social media platform and the quality of those visits (e.g., time on site and number of pages viewed) was significantly lower than visits originating from other referring websites. In particular, visitors referred to the website through targeted promotion (e.g., inclusion in a website listing classroom teaching resources) had higher quality visits. Once engaged in the site's core content, visitor retention was high; however, visitors rarely used the tutorial resources that serve to explain the site's use. Our results demonstrate that simple changes in website design, content and promotion are likely to increase the number of visitors and their engagement. While there is a growing emphasis on using the web to broaden the impacts of biological research, time and resources remain limited. Clickstream analytics provides an easily accessible, relatively fast and quantitative means by which those engaging in educational outreach can improve upon their efforts.

  10. United States COVID-19 Community Levels by County as Originally Posted

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Mar 19, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022). United States COVID-19 Community Levels by County as Originally Posted [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/united-states-covid-19-community-levels-by-county-as-originally-posted-ebafa
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 19, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttp://www.cdc.gov/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This public use dataset has 11 data elements reflecting COVID-19 community levels for all available counties. This dataset contains the same values used to display information available at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/community-levels-county-map.html. CDC looks at the combination of three metrics — new COVID-19 admissions per 100,000 population in the past 7 days, the percent of staffed inpatient beds occupied by COVID-19 patients, and total new COVID-19 cases per 100,000 population in the past 7 days — to determine the COVID-19 community level. The COVID-19 community level is determined by the higher of the new admissions and inpatient beds metrics, based on the current level of new cases per 100,000 population in the past 7 days. New COVID-19 admissions and the percent of staffed inpatient beds occupied represent the current potential for strain on the health system. Data on new cases acts as an early warning indicator of potential increases in health system strain in the event of a COVID-19 surge. Using these data, the COVID-19 community level is classified as low, medium , or high. COVID-19 Community Levels can help communities and individuals make decisions based on their local context and their unique needs. Community vaccination coverage and other local information, like early alerts from surveillance, such as through wastewater or the number of emergency department visits for COVID-19, when available, can also inform decision making for health officials and individuals. See https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/community-levels.html for more information. Visit CDC’s COVID Data Tracker County View* to learn more about the individual metrics used for CDC’s COVID-19 community level in your county. Please note that county-level data are not available for territories. Go to https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#county-view. For the most accurate and up-to-date data for any county or state, visit the relevant health department website. *COVID Data Tracker may display data that differ from state and local websites. This can be due to differences in how data were collected, how metrics were calculated, or the timing of web updates.

  11. a

    Data from: Site Visit Form

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 9, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    ArcGIS for Commercial Forestry (2020). Site Visit Form [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/documents/7a82da2788464241bf5b424c6207aff7
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 9, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    ArcGIS for Commercial Forestry
    Description

    xlsx form for Survey123 endangered species monitoring workflows. This file can be used to create a new form.Download the file and use to create a new survey.

  12. m

    Eye tracking data for website design of Ecotourism related SMEs

    • data.mendeley.com
    Updated Jul 1, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ioanna Yfantidou (2024). Eye tracking data for website design of Ecotourism related SMEs [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17632/jywyhjgm3z.1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 1, 2024
    Authors
    Ioanna Yfantidou
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The data set includes Time from First Fixation to Click and Click Count data from particpants who viewed a beta-version website that promotes ecotourism in Greece. A Tobii Nano eye tracker was used for the data collection.

  13. Google Analytics Sample

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Sep 19, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Google BigQuery (2019). Google Analytics Sample [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/bigquery/google-analytics-sample
    Explore at:
    zip(0 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 19, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    BigQueryhttps://cloud.google.com/bigquery
    Googlehttp://google.com/
    Authors
    Google BigQuery
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    Context

    The Google Merchandise Store sells Google branded merchandise. The data is typical of what you would see for an ecommerce website.

    Content

    The sample dataset contains Google Analytics 360 data from the Google Merchandise Store, a real ecommerce store. The Google Merchandise Store sells Google branded merchandise. The data is typical of what you would see for an ecommerce website. It includes the following kinds of information:

    Traffic source data: information about where website visitors originate. This includes data about organic traffic, paid search traffic, display traffic, etc. Content data: information about the behavior of users on the site. This includes the URLs of pages that visitors look at, how they interact with content, etc. Transactional data: information about the transactions that occur on the Google Merchandise Store website.

    Fork this kernel to get started.

    Acknowledgements

    Data from: https://bigquery.cloud.google.com/table/bigquery-public-data:google_analytics_sample.ga_sessions_20170801

    Banner Photo by Edho Pratama from Unsplash.

    Inspiration

    What is the total number of transactions generated per device browser in July 2017?

    The real bounce rate is defined as the percentage of visits with a single pageview. What was the real bounce rate per traffic source?

    What was the average number of product pageviews for users who made a purchase in July 2017?

    What was the average number of product pageviews for users who did not make a purchase in July 2017?

    What was the average total transactions per user that made a purchase in July 2017?

    What is the average amount of money spent per session in July 2017?

    What is the sequence of pages viewed?

  14. Data from: Recurrence, fidelity, and proximity to previously visited sites...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    zip
    Updated Mar 4, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Carlotta Bonaldi; Yannis Vardanis; Mikkel Willemoes; Chris Hewson; Phil Atkinson; Jan-Åke Nilsson; Raymond Klaassen; Roine Strandberg; Anders Tøttrup; Paul Howey; Thomas Alerstam; Kasper Thorup (2024). Recurrence, fidelity, and proximity to previously visited sites throughout the annual cycle in a trans-Saharan migrant, the Common Cuckoo [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.r4xgxd2mv
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 4, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    British Trust for Ornithologyhttp://www.bto.org/
    University of Groningen
    University of Copenhagen
    Microwave Telemetry
    Lund University
    Authors
    Carlotta Bonaldi; Yannis Vardanis; Mikkel Willemoes; Chris Hewson; Phil Atkinson; Jan-Åke Nilsson; Raymond Klaassen; Roine Strandberg; Anders Tøttrup; Paul Howey; Thomas Alerstam; Kasper Thorup
    License

    https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html

    Description

    Most migratory birds return every year to the same breeding sites and some species show a similarly high fidelity to wintering grounds as well. Fidelity to stopover sites during migration has been much less studied and is usually found to be lower. Here, we investigate site fidelity and distance to previously visited sites throughout the annual cycle in the common cuckoo, a nocturnal trans-Saharan migrant, based on satellite-tracking data from repeated annual migrations of thirteen adult males. All birds (100%) returned to the same breeding grounds, with a median shortest distance of only 1 km from the locations in previous year. This was in strong contrast to a much lower and much less precise site fidelity at non-breeding sites during the annual cycle: In only 18% of the possible cases in all non-breeding regions combined, did the cuckoos return to within 50 km of a previously visited non-breeding site, with no significant differences among the main staging regions (Europe in autumn, Sahel in autumn, wintering in Central Africa, West Africa in spring, Europe in spring). The shortest distance to a previously visited non-breeding site differed among the staging regions with median shortest distances for the longest stopovers of 131 km 2;1223 in Europe, 207 km [1;2222] in Sahel in autumn and 110 km [0;628] in Central Africa. The distance to a previously visited staging site decreased with the time spent at the stopover in a previous year. Understanding the drivers of recurrence and site selection in migratory birds are important for guiding conservation efforts in this group but further studies are needed to establish whether the patterns observed in cuckoos are general among terrestrial migrants with continuous distribution of habitat.

  15. Habitat and Vegetation Assessment - 2017 - Terrestrial Species Stressor...

    • data-cdfw.opendata.arcgis.com
    • data.cnra.ca.gov
    • +5more
    Updated May 23, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Department of Fish and Wildlife (2019). Habitat and Vegetation Assessment - 2017 - Terrestrial Species Stressor Monitoring [ds2828] [Dataset]. https://data-cdfw.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/CDFW::habitat-and-vegetation-assessment-2017-terrestrial-species-stressor-monitoring-ds2828
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 23, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    California Department of Fish and Wildlifehttps://wildlife.ca.gov/
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    Vegetation surveys were conducted at each Great Valley and Mojave Desert study site between March and June 2017. The surveys followed the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Reconnissance Field Protocol and were representative of either the lifeform for which the survey site was selected, or the dominant vegetation type encountered on site, if the preassigned lieform was not found. These reconnaissance vegetation surveys are based on a representative stand with a subset of dominant or characteristic plant species and their cover values recorded rather than a plot based survey. Field crews determined the primary alliance for the stand and identified the dominant species present, along with percent cover and phenology information. If there was any uncertainty in keying to alliance, a secondary alliance was also described, along with any details to aid in later determination. The CDFW Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program reviewed and confirmed or corrected all field assessments herein.

  16. youtube.com Website Traffic, Ranking, Analytics [July 2025]

    • semrush.com
    • stb2.digiseotools.com
    Updated Aug 12, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Semrush (2025). youtube.com Website Traffic, Ranking, Analytics [July 2025] [Dataset]. https://www.semrush.com/website/youtube.com/overview/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 12, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Semrushhttps://fr.semrush.com/
    License

    https://www.semrush.com/company/legal/terms-of-service/https://www.semrush.com/company/legal/terms-of-service/

    Time period covered
    Aug 12, 2025
    Area covered
    YouTube, Worldwide
    Variables measured
    visits, backlinks, bounceRate, pagesPerVisit, authorityScore, organicKeywords, avgVisitDuration, referringDomains, trafficByCountry, paidSearchTraffic, and 3 more
    Measurement technique
    Semrush Traffic Analytics; Click-stream data
    Description

    youtube.com is ranked #1 in KR with 47.12B Traffic. Categories: Newspapers, Online Services. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

  17. Freshwater Site Visits and Ad-hoc Sightings

    • gbif.org
    Updated May 16, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Natural Resources Wales (2025). Freshwater Site Visits and Ad-hoc Sightings [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.15468/hfredc
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 16, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Global Biodiversity Information Facilityhttps://www.gbif.org/
    Natural Resources Wales
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Oct 2, 1990 - Apr 22, 2009
    Area covered
    Description

    Records of species and habitat ad hoc sightings collected in the freshwater environment. This includes, but it not limited to aquatic plants, amphibians and certain easily identified invertebrates. Data collection will be on-going during the monitoring and other survey work.

  18. d

    Swash Web Browsing Clickstream Data - 1.5M Worldwide Users - GDPR Compliant

    • datarade.ai
    .csv, .xls
    Updated Jun 27, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Swash (2023). Swash Web Browsing Clickstream Data - 1.5M Worldwide Users - GDPR Compliant [Dataset]. https://datarade.ai/data-products/swash-blockchain-bitcoin-and-web3-enthusiasts-swash
    Explore at:
    .csv, .xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 27, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Swash
    Area covered
    Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Monaco, Latvia, Jordan, Liechtenstein, Russian Federation, Belarus, Jamaica, India, Uzbekistan
    Description

    Unlock the Power of Behavioural Data with GDPR-Compliant Clickstream Insights.

    Swash clickstream data offers a comprehensive and GDPR-compliant dataset sourced from users worldwide, encompassing both desktop and mobile browsing behaviour. Here's an in-depth look at what sets us apart and how our data can benefit your organisation.

    User-Centric Approach: Unlike traditional data collection methods, we take a user-centric approach by rewarding users for the data they willingly provide. This unique methodology ensures transparent data collection practices, encourages user participation, and establishes trust between data providers and consumers.

    Wide Coverage and Varied Categories: Our clickstream data covers diverse categories, including search, shopping, and URL visits. Whether you are interested in understanding user preferences in e-commerce, analysing search behaviour across different industries, or tracking website visits, our data provides a rich and multi-dimensional view of user activities.

    GDPR Compliance and Privacy: We prioritise data privacy and strictly adhere to GDPR guidelines. Our data collection methods are fully compliant, ensuring the protection of user identities and personal information. You can confidently leverage our clickstream data without compromising privacy or facing regulatory challenges.

    Market Intelligence and Consumer Behaviuor: Gain deep insights into market intelligence and consumer behaviour using our clickstream data. Understand trends, preferences, and user behaviour patterns by analysing the comprehensive user-level, time-stamped raw or processed data feed. Uncover valuable information about user journeys, search funnels, and paths to purchase to enhance your marketing strategies and drive business growth.

    High-Frequency Updates and Consistency: We provide high-frequency updates and consistent user participation, offering both historical data and ongoing daily delivery. This ensures you have access to up-to-date insights and a continuous data feed for comprehensive analysis. Our reliable and consistent data empowers you to make accurate and timely decisions.

    Custom Reporting and Analysis: We understand that every organisation has unique requirements. That's why we offer customisable reporting options, allowing you to tailor the analysis and reporting of clickstream data to your specific needs. Whether you need detailed metrics, visualisations, or in-depth analytics, we provide the flexibility to meet your reporting requirements.

    Data Quality and Credibility: We take data quality seriously. Our data sourcing practices are designed to ensure responsible and reliable data collection. We implement rigorous data cleaning, validation, and verification processes, guaranteeing the accuracy and reliability of our clickstream data. You can confidently rely on our data to drive your decision-making processes.

  19. W

    Website Monitoring Services Report

    • datainsightsmarket.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Apr 26, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Data Insights Market (2025). Website Monitoring Services Report [Dataset]. https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/reports/website-monitoring-services-1445621
    Explore at:
    doc, ppt, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 26, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Data Insights Market
    License

    https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The global website monitoring services market, valued at $26.85 billion in 2025, is projected to experience robust growth, driven by the increasing reliance on websites for business operations and the escalating need for seamless online experiences. A compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.6% from 2025 to 2033 indicates a significant expansion, with the market exceeding $50 billion by the end of the forecast period. This growth is fueled by several key factors. The proliferation of e-commerce and online businesses necessitates robust monitoring to ensure website uptime and performance, directly impacting revenue and customer satisfaction. Furthermore, the rising adoption of cloud-based solutions offers scalable and cost-effective monitoring options, attracting both small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large enterprises. Advanced features such as real-time alerts, performance analysis, and synthetic monitoring are becoming increasingly popular, driving demand for sophisticated solutions. The market segmentation, with applications spanning SMEs, large enterprises, and others, and types encompassing on-premise and cloud-based services, reflects the diverse needs of various customer segments. Geographical expansion, particularly in rapidly developing economies within Asia Pacific, also contributes significantly to market growth. However, challenges such as the complexity of implementing comprehensive monitoring systems and the associated costs could potentially act as restraints. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of established players and emerging companies offering diverse solutions, creating a dynamic and innovative market. The competitive landscape is highly dynamic, with established players like Google, Dynatrace, and SolarWinds competing alongside specialized providers such as Uptime Robot and ManageWP. This competition fosters innovation and drives the development of increasingly sophisticated and user-friendly monitoring tools. The continuous evolution of website technologies and security threats necessitates the development of adaptive monitoring solutions that can address emerging challenges. Future growth will likely be shaped by the increasing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into monitoring platforms, enabling proactive issue detection and improved performance optimization. The adoption of serverless architectures and edge computing will also impact the future of website monitoring, necessitating the development of monitoring solutions adapted to these evolving technological landscapes. The continued growth of the global digital economy ensures the long-term viability and expansion of the website monitoring services market.

  20. Replication Data for "Prevalence of Third-Party Tracking on Abortion Clinic...

    • figshare.com
    txt
    Updated May 30, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ari B Friedman (2023). Replication Data for "Prevalence of Third-Party Tracking on Abortion Clinic Web Pages" [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21437970.v1
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Ari B Friedman
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    In this cross-sectional study, we extracted the uniform resource locator (URL) of each National Abortion Federation member facility on May 6, 2022. We visited each unique URL using webXray (Timothy Libert), which detects third-party tracking. For each web page, we recorded data transfers to third-party domains. Transfers typically include a user’s IP (internet protocol) address and the web page being visited. We also recorded the presence of third-party cookies, data stored on a user’s computer that can facilitate tracking across multiple websites.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
John Bailey; Mikael Laakso; Mikael Laakso; Linus Nyman; Linus Nyman; John Bailey (2020). Web tracking data for 500 websites popular among Finnish web users [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3543444
Organization logo

Web tracking data for 500 websites popular among Finnish web users

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Apr 18, 2020
Dataset provided by
Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
Authors
John Bailey; Mikael Laakso; Mikael Laakso; Linus Nyman; Linus Nyman; John Bailey
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

This dataset includes observations of trackers present on the top 500 pages popular among Finnish web users as per Alexa. The data collection was conducted using TrackerTracker in five separate requests for five subsets of 100 sites each between 19.8.2017 and 20.8.2017. The tool used a tracker database from March 24, 2017. More methodology details are described in the associated journal article https://doi.org/10.23978/inf.87841

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu