Snapshot img

Big Data As A Service Market Size 2025-2029

The big data as a service market size is forecast to increase by USD 75.71 billion, at a CAGR of 20.5% between 2024 and 2029.

The Big Data as a Service (BDaaS) market is experiencing significant growth, driven by the increasing volume of data being generated daily. This trend is further fueled by the rising popularity of big data in emerging technologies, such as blockchain, which requires massive amounts of data for optimal functionality. However, this market is not without challenges. Data privacy and security risks pose a significant obstacle, as the handling of large volumes of data increases the potential for breaches and cyberattacks. Edge computing solutions and on-premise data centers facilitate real-time data processing and analysis, while alerting systems and data validation rules maintain data quality.
Companies must navigate these challenges to effectively capitalize on the opportunities presented by the BDaaS market. By implementing robust data security measures and adhering to data privacy regulations, organizations can mitigate risks and build trust with their customers, ensuring long-term success in this dynamic market.

What will be the Size of the Big Data As A Service Market during the forecast period?

Get Key Insights on Market Forecast (PDF) Request Free Sample

The market continues to evolve, offering a range of solutions that address various data management needs across industries. Hadoop ecosystem services play a crucial role in handling large volumes of data, while ETL process optimization ensures data quality metrics are met. Data transformation services and data pipeline automation streamline data workflows, enabling businesses to derive valuable insights from their data. Nosql database solutions and custom data solutions cater to unique data requirements, with Spark cluster management optimizing performance. Data security protocols, metadata management tools, and data encryption methods protect sensitive information. Cloud data storage, predictive modeling APIs, and real-time data ingestion facilitate agile data processing.
Data anonymization techniques and data governance frameworks ensure compliance with regulations. Machine learning algorithms, access control mechanisms, and data processing pipelines drive automation and efficiency. API integration services, scalable data infrastructure, and distributed computing platforms enable seamless data integration and processing. Data lineage tracking, high-velocity data streams, data visualization dashboards, and data lake formation provide actionable insights for informed decision-making.
For instance, a leading retailer leveraged data warehousing services and predictive modeling APIs to analyze customer buying patterns, resulting in a 15% increase in sales. This success story highlights the potential of big data solutions to drive business growth and innovation.

How is this Big Data As A Service Industry segmented?

The big data as a service industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

Type

  Data Analytics-as-a-service (DAaaS)
  Hadoop-as-a-service (HaaS)
  Data-as-a-service (DaaS)


Deployment

  Public cloud
  Hybrid cloud
  Private cloud


End-user

  Large enterprises
  SMEs


Geography

  North America

    US
    Canada
    Mexico


  Europe

    France
    Germany
    Russia
    UK


  APAC

    China
    India
    Japan


  Rest of World (ROW)

By Type Insights

The Data analytics-as-a-service (DAaas) segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period. The data analytics-as-a-service (DAaaS) segment experiences significant growth within the market. Currently, over 30% of businesses adopt cloud-based data analytics solutions, reflecting the increasing demand for flexible, cost-effective alternatives to traditional on-premises infrastructure. Furthermore, industry experts anticipate that the DAaaS market will expand by approximately 25% in the upcoming years. This market segment offers organizations of all sizes the opportunity to access advanced analytical tools without the need for substantial capital investment and operational overhead. DAaaS solutions encompass the entire data analytics process, from data ingestion and preparation to advanced modeling and visualization, on a subscription or pay-per-use basis. Data integration tools, data cataloging systems, self-service data discovery, and data version control enhance data accessibility and usability.

The continuous evolution of this market is driven by the increasing volume, variety, and velocity of data, as well as the growing recognition of the business value that can be derived from data insights. Organizations across var

Information and technology services and telecommunications have the highest share of employers that expect that AI and big data will be core skills for their workers between 2025 and 2030 or over 65 percent. This is unsurprising as AI is vital to disseminating large quantities of information and improve telecommunication services.

This training dataset was calculated using the mechanistic modeling approach. See “Big data training data for artificial intelligence-based Li-ion diagnosis and prognosis“ (Journal of Power Sources, Volume 479, 15 December 2020, 228806) and "Analysis of Synthetic Voltage vs. Capacity Datasets for Big Data Diagnosis and Prognosis" (Energies, under review) for more details

The V vs. Q dataset was compiled with a resolution of 0.01 for the triplets and C/25 charges. This accounts for more than 5,000 different paths. Each path was simulated with at most 0.85% increases for each The training dataset, therefore, contains more than 700,000 unique voltage vs. capacity curves.

4 Variables are included, see read me file for details and example how to use. Cell info: Contains information on the setup of the mechanistic model Qnorm: normalize capacity scale for all voltage curves pathinfo: index for simulated conditions for all voltage curves volt: voltage data. Each column corresponds to the voltage simulated under the conditions of the corresponding line in pathinfo.

The AI and Big Data Analytics market within the telecommunications sector is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing need for network optimization, personalized customer experiences, and advanced fraud detection. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to achieve a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 18% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $60 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. Firstly, the exponential growth of data generated by 5G networks and IoT devices necessitates sophisticated analytical tools to manage and extract value. Secondly, telecom operators are increasingly adopting AI-powered solutions for predictive maintenance of network infrastructure, resulting in significant cost savings and improved service reliability. Thirdly, personalized marketing campaigns driven by AI-powered customer segmentation and predictive analytics are boosting customer engagement and revenue generation. Finally, the rising threat of fraud and security breaches is driving demand for AI-based security systems capable of detecting and mitigating these threats in real-time. The market is segmented by application (private vs. commercial) and deployment type (cloud-based vs. on-premise), with cloud-based solutions gaining significant traction due to their scalability and cost-effectiveness. Major players like AWS, Google, and IBM are actively shaping the market landscape through strategic partnerships and continuous innovation, while numerous smaller specialized firms cater to specific needs within the sector. Geographic distribution shows strong growth across North America and Asia-Pacific, reflecting high technological adoption and expanding digital infrastructure in these regions. The competitive landscape is characterized by both large technology companies offering comprehensive solutions and specialized niche players focusing on specific segments within the telecom industry. While the rapid adoption of cloud-based solutions presents opportunities for growth, challenges remain, including data privacy concerns, the need for skilled professionals to implement and manage these systems, and the high initial investment costs associated with AI and big data infrastructure. Despite these challenges, the long-term outlook for the AI and Big Data Analytics market in telecommunications remains extremely positive, driven by ongoing technological advancements and the increasing reliance of telecom operators on data-driven decision-making to enhance operational efficiency and improve customer satisfaction. The market's evolution will be further influenced by the development of 6G technologies and the expansion of the Internet of Things (IoT), which will generate even larger volumes of data requiring sophisticated AI and big data analytics for effective management and analysis.

This statistic depicts the revenue generated by the big data services market in the Asia Pacific (excluding Japan) from 2012 to 2014, as well as a forecast of revenue from 2015 to 2017. In 2014, revenues associated with the big data services market in the Asia Pacific amounted to *** million U.S. dollars. 'Big data' refers to data sets that are too large or too complex for traditional data processing applications. Additionally, the term is often used to refer to the technologies that enable predictive analytics or other methods of extracting value from data.

🇸🇪 스웨덴

Please cite the following paper when using this dataset:

N. Thakur, V. Su, M. Shao, K. Patel, H. Jeong, V. Knieling, and A.Bian “A labelled dataset for sentiment analysis of videos on YouTube, TikTok, and other sources about the 2024 outbreak of measles,” arXiv [cs.CY], 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.07693

Abstract

This dataset contains the data of 4011 videos about the ongoing outbreak of measles published on 264 websites on the internet between January 1, 2024, and May 31, 2024. These websites primarily include YouTube and TikTok, which account for 48.6% and 15.2% of the videos, respectively. The remainder of the websites include Instagram and Facebook as well as the websites of various global and local news organizations. For each of these videos, the URL of the video, title of the post, description of the post, and the date of publication of the video are presented as separate attributes in the dataset. After developing this dataset, sentiment analysis (using VADER), subjectivity analysis (using TextBlob), and fine-grain sentiment analysis (using DistilRoBERTa-base) of the video titles and video descriptions were performed. This included classifying each video title and video description into (i) one of the sentiment classes i.e. positive, negative, or neutral, (ii) one of the subjectivity classes i.e. highly opinionated, neutral opinionated, or least opinionated, and (iii) one of the fine-grain sentiment classes i.e. fear, surprise, joy, sadness, anger, disgust, or neutral. These results are presented as separate attributes in the dataset for the training and testing of machine learning algorithms for performing sentiment analysis or subjectivity analysis in this field as well as for other applications. The paper associated with this dataset (please see the above-mentioned citation) also presents a list of open research questions that may be investigated using this dataset.

To inform efforts to improve the discoverability of and access to biomedical datasets by providing a preliminary estimate of the number and type of datasets generated annually by National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded researchers. Of particular interest is characterizing those datasets that are not deposited in a known data repository or registry, e.g., those for which a related journal article does not indicate that underlying data have been deposited in a known repository. Such “invisible” datasets comprise the “long tail” of biomedical data and pose significant practical challenges to ongoing efforts to improve discoverability of and access to biomedical research data. This study identified datasets used to support the NIH-funded research reported in articles published in 2011 and cited in PubMed® and deposited in PubMed Central® (PMC). After searching for all articles that acknowledged NIH support, we first identified articles that contained explicit mention of datasets being deposited in recognized repositories. Thirty members of the NIH staff then analyzed a random sample of the remaining articles to estimate how many and what types of datasets were used per article. Two reviewers independently examined each paper. Each dataset is titled Bigdata_randomsample_xxxx_xx. The xxxx refers to the set of articles the annotator looked at, while the xxidentifies the annotator that did the analysis. Within each dataset, the author has listed the number of datasets they identified within the articles that they looked at. For every dataset that was found, the annotators were asked to insert a new row into the spreadsheet, and then describe the dataset they found (e.g., type of data, subject of study, etc.). Each row in the spreadsheet was always prepended by the PubMed Identifier (PMID) where the dataset was found. Finally, the files 2013-08-07_Bigdatastudy_dataanalysis, Dataanalysis_ack_si_datasets, and Datasets additional random sample mention vs deposit 20150313 refer to the analysis that was performed based on each annotator's analysis of the publications they were assigned, and the data deposits identified from the analysis.

Data Entry Service Market Outlook

The global data entry service market size is poised to experience significant growth, with the market expected to rise from USD 2.5 billion in 2023 to USD 4.8 billion by 2032, achieving a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7.5% over the forecast period. This growth can be attributed to several factors including the increasing adoption of digital technologies, the rising demand for data accuracy and integrity, and the need for businesses to manage vast amounts of data efficiently.

One of the key growth factors driving the data entry service market is the rapid digital transformation across various industries. As businesses continue to digitize their operations, the volume of data generated has increased exponentially. This data needs to be accurately entered, processed, and managed to derive meaningful insights. The demand for data entry services has surged as companies seek to outsource these non-core activities, enabling them to focus on their primary business operations. Additionally, the widespread adoption of cloud-based solutions and big data analytics has further fueled the demand for efficient data management services.

Another significant driver of market growth is the increasing need for data accuracy and integrity. Inaccurate or incomplete data can lead to poor decision-making, financial losses, and a decrease in operational efficiency. Organizations are increasingly recognizing the importance of maintaining high-quality data and are investing in data entry services to ensure that their databases are accurate, up-to-date, and reliable. This is particularly crucial for industries such as healthcare, BFSI, and retail, where precise data is essential for regulatory compliance, customer relationship management, and operational efficiency.

The cost-effectiveness of outsourcing data entry services is also contributing to market growth. By outsourcing these tasks to specialized service providers, organizations can save on labor costs, reduce operational expenses, and improve productivity. Service providers often have access to advanced tools and technologies, as well as skilled professionals who can perform data entry tasks more efficiently and accurately. This not only leads to cost savings but also allows businesses to reallocate resources to more strategic activities, driving overall growth.

From a regional perspective, the Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the highest growth in the data entry service market during the forecast period. This can be attributed to the region's strong IT infrastructure, the presence of numerous outsourcing service providers, and the growing adoption of digital technologies across various industries. North America and Europe are also significant markets, driven by the high demand for data management services in sectors such as healthcare, BFSI, and retail. The Middle East & Africa and Latin America are anticipated to experience steady growth, supported by increasing investments in digital infrastructure and the rising awareness of the benefits of data entry services.

Service Type Analysis

The data entry service market can be segmented into various service types, including online data entry, offline data entry, data processing, data conversion, data cleansing, and others. Each of these service types plays a crucial role in ensuring the accuracy, integrity, and usability of data. Online data entry services involve entering data directly into an online system or database, which is essential for real-time data management and accessibility. This service type is particularly popular in industries such as e-commerce, where timely and accurate data entry is critical for inventory management and customer service.

Offline data entry services, on the other hand, involve entering data into offline systems or databases, which are later synchronized with online systems. This service type is often used in industries where internet connectivity may be unreliable or where data security is a primary concern. Offline data entry is also essential for processing historical data or data that is collected through physical forms and documents. The demand for offline data entry services is driven by the need for accurate and timely data entry in sectors such as manufacturing, government, and healthcare.

Data processing services involve the manipulation, transformation, and analysis of raw data to produce meaningful information. This includes tasks such as data validation, data sorting, data aggregation, and data analysis. Data processing is a critical componen

This index compiles empirical data on AI and big data surveillance use for 179 countries around the world between 2012 and 2022— although the bulk of the sources stem from between 2017 and 2022. The index does not distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate uses of AI and big data surveillance. Rather, the purpose of the research is to show how new surveillance capabilities are transforming governments’ ability to monitor and track individuals or groups. Last updated February 2022.

This index addresses three primary questions: Which countries have documented AI and big data public surveillance capabilities? What types of AI and big data public surveillance technologies are governments deploying? And which companies are involved in supplying this technology?

The index measures AI and big data public surveillance systems deployed by state authorities, such as safe cities, social media monitoring, or facial recognition cameras. It does not assess the use of surveillance in private spaces (such as privately-owned businesses in malls or hospitals), nor does it evaluate private uses of this technology (e.g., facial recognition integrated in personal devices). It also does not include AI and big data surveillance used in Automated Border Control systems that are commonly found in airport entry/exit terminals. Finally, the index includes a list of frequently mentioned companies – by country – which source material indicates provide AI and big data surveillance tools and services.

All reference source material used to build the index has been compiled into an open Zotero library, available at https://www.zotero.org/groups/2347403/global_ai_surveillance/items. The index includes detailed information for seventy-seven countries where open source analysis indicates that governments have acquired AI and big data public surveillance capabilities. The index breaks down AI and big data public surveillance tools into the following categories: smart city/safe city, public facial recognition systems, smart policing, and social media surveillance.

The findings indicate that at least seventy-seven out of 179 countries are actively using AI and big data technology for public surveillance purposes:

• Smart city/safe city platforms: fifty-five countries • Public facial recognition systems: sixty-eight countries • Smart policing: sixty-one countries • Social media surveillance: thirty-six countries

The USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS) recently established SCINet , which consists of a shared high performance computing resource, Ceres, and the dedicated high-speed Internet2 network used to access Ceres. Current and potential SCINet users are using and generating very large datasets so SCINet needs to be provisioned with adequate data storage for their active computing. It is not designed to hold data beyond active research phases. At the same time, the National Agricultural Library has been developing the Ag Data Commons, a research data catalog and repository designed for public data release and professional data curation. Ag Data Commons needs to anticipate the size and nature of data it will be tasked with handling. The ARS Web-enabled Databases Working Group, organized under the SCINet initiative, conducted a study to establish baseline data storage needs and practices, and to make projections that could inform future infrastructure design, purchases, and policies. The SCINet Web-enabled Databases Working Group helped develop the survey which is the basis for an internal report. While the report was for internal use, the survey and resulting data may be generally useful and are being released publicly. From October 24 to November 8, 2016 we administered a 17-question survey (Appendix A) by emailing a Survey Monkey link to all ARS Research Leaders, intending to cover data storage needs of all 1,675 SY (Category 1 and Category 4) scientists. We designed the survey to accommodate either individual researcher responses or group responses. Research Leaders could decide, based on their unit's practices or their management preferences, whether to delegate response to a data management expert in their unit, to all members of their unit, or to themselves collate responses from their unit before reporting in the survey.
Larger storage ranges cover vastly different amounts of data so the implications here could be significant depending on whether the true amount is at the lower or higher end of the range. Therefore, we requested more detail from "Big Data users," those 47 respondents who indicated they had more than 10 to 100 TB or over 100 TB total current data (Q5). All other respondents are called "Small Data users." Because not all of these follow-up requests were successful, we used actual follow-up responses to estimate likely responses for those who did not respond. We defined active data as data that would be used within the next six months. All other data would be considered inactive, or archival. To calculate per person storage needs we used the high end of the reported range divided by 1 for an individual response, or by G, the number of individuals in a group response. For Big Data users we used the actual reported values or estimated likely values.

Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Appendix A: ARS data storage survey questions. File Name: Appendix A.pdfResource Description: The full list of questions asked with the possible responses. The survey was not administered using this PDF but the PDF was generated directly from the administered survey using the Print option under Design Survey. Asterisked questions were required. A list of Research Units and their associated codes was provided in a drop down not shown here. Resource Software Recommended: Adobe Acrobat,url: https://get.adobe.com/reader/ Resource Title: CSV of Responses from ARS Researcher Data Storage Survey. File Name: Machine-readable survey response data.csvResource Description: CSV file includes raw responses from the administered survey, as downloaded unfiltered from Survey Monkey, including incomplete responses. Also includes additional classification and calculations to support analysis. Individual email addresses and IP addresses have been removed. This information is that same data as in the Excel spreadsheet (also provided).Resource Title: Responses from ARS Researcher Data Storage Survey. File Name: Data Storage Survey Data for public release.xlsxResource Description: MS Excel worksheet that Includes raw responses from the administered survey, as downloaded unfiltered from Survey Monkey, including incomplete responses. Also includes additional classification and calculations to support analysis. Individual email addresses and IP addresses have been removed.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel

This dataset provides information about the number of properties, residents, and average property values for Big V Road cross streets in Mount Olive, MS.

This dataset is the result of a full-population crawl of the .gov.uk web domain, aiming to capture a full picture of the scope of public-facing government activity online and the links between different government bodies. Local governments have been developing online services, aiming to better serve the public and reduce administrative costs. However, the impact of this work, and the links between governments’ online and offline activities, remain uncertain. The overall research question for this research examines whether local e-government has met these expectations, of Digital Era Governance and of its practitioners. Aim was to directly analyse the structure and content of government online. It shows that recent digital-centric public administration theories, typified by the Digital Era Governance quasi-paradigm, are not empirically supported by the UK local government experience. The data consist of a file of individual Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) fetched during the crawl, and a further file containing pairs of URLs reflecting the Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) links between them. In addition, a GraphML format file is presented for a version of the data reduced to third-level-domains, with accompanying attribute data for the publishing government organisations and calculated webometric statistics based on the third-level-domain link network.This project engages with the Digital Era Governance (DEG) work of Dunleavy et. al. and draws upon new empirical methods to explore local government and its use of Internet-related technology. It challenges the existing literature, arguing that e-government benefits have been oversold, particularly for transactional services; it updates DEG with insights from local government. The distinctive methodological approach is to use full-population datasets and large-scale web data to provide an empirical foundation for theoretical development, and to test existing theorists’ claims. A new full-population web crawl of .gov.uk is used to analyse the shape and structure of online government using webometrics. Tools from computer science, such as automated classification, are used to enrich our understanding of the dataset. A new full-population panel dataset is constructed covering council performance, cost, web quality, and satisfaction. The local government web shows a wide scope of provision but only limited evidence in support of the existing rhetorics of Internet-enabled service delivery. In addition, no evidence is found of a link between web development and performance, cost, or satisfaction. DEG is challenged and developed in light of these findings. The project adds value by developing new methods for the use of big data in public administration, by empirically challenging long-held assumptions on the value of the web for government, and by building a foundation of knowledge about local government online to be built on by further research. This is an ESRC-funded DPhil research project. A web crawl was carried out with Heritrix, the Internet Archive's web crawler. A list of all registered domains in .gov.uk (and their www.x.gov.uk equivalents) was used as a set of start seeds. Sites outside .gov.uk were excluded; robots.txt files were respected, with the consequence that some .gov.uk sites (and some parts of other .gov.uk sites) were not fetched. Certain other areas were manually excluded, particularly crawling traps (e.g. calendars which will serve infinite numbers of pages in the past and future and those websites returning different URLs for each browser session) and the contents of certain large peripheral databases such as online local authority library catalogues. A full set of regular expressions used to filter the URLs fetched are included in the archive. On completion of the crawl, the page URLs and link data were extracted from the output WARC files. The page URLs were manually examined and re-filtered to handle various broken web servers and to reduce duplication of content where multiple views were presented onto the same content (for example, where a site was presented at both http://organisation.gov.uk/ and http://www.organisation.gov.uk/ without HTTP redirection between the two). Finally, The link list was filtered against the URL list to remove bogus links and both lists were map/reduced to a single set of files. Also included in this data release is a derived dataset more useful for high-level work. This is a GraphML file containing all the link and page information reduced to third-level domain level (so darlington.gov.uk is considered as a single node, not a large set of pages) and with the links binarised to present/not present between each node. Each graph node also has various attributes, including the name of the registering organisation and various webometric measures including PageRank, indegree and betweenness centrality.

The Numerical Analysis Software market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for advanced computational capabilities across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $2.5 billion in 2025, is projected to witness a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 8% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated market value of $4.8 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. The proliferation of big data and the need for efficient data analysis techniques are pushing organizations to adopt sophisticated numerical analysis software solutions. Furthermore, advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and high-performance computing (HPC) are creating new applications and opportunities for numerical analysis software. The rising adoption of cloud-based solutions is also contributing to market growth, offering scalability and cost-effectiveness. However, the market faces certain restraints, including the high cost of advanced software licenses and the need for specialized expertise to effectively utilize these tools. The market is segmented by software type (commercial vs. open-source), application (engineering, finance, scientific research), and deployment mode (on-premise vs. cloud). Key players in the market include established names like MathWorks (MATLAB), and Analytica, alongside open-source options like GNU Octave and Scilab. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of large vendors offering comprehensive solutions and smaller players focusing on niche applications. The continued growth of the Numerical Analysis Software market hinges on several key trends. The increasing integration of numerical analysis techniques within broader data science and analytics workflows is a prominent factor. This is leading to the development of more user-friendly interfaces and integrated platforms. Furthermore, the growing emphasis on data security and privacy regulations is influencing the development of secure and compliant software solutions. The market also witnesses ongoing innovation in algorithms and computational techniques, driving improvements in accuracy, speed, and efficiency. The rise of specialized applications within specific industries, such as financial modeling, weather forecasting, and drug discovery, also fuels further market growth. The adoption of advanced hardware, such as GPUs and specialized processors, is enhancing the performance and capabilities of numerical analysis software, fostering further market expansion.

As our generation and collection of quantitative digital data increase, so do our ambitions for extracting new insights and knowledge from those data. In recent years, those ambitions have manifested themselves in so-called “Grand Challenge” projects coordinated by academic institutions. These projects are often broadly interdisciplinary and attempt to address to major issues facing the world in the present and the future through the collection and integration of diverse types of scientific data. In general, however, disciplines that focus on the past are underrepresented in this environment – in part because these grand challenges tend to look forward rather than back, and in part because historical disciplines tend to produce qualitative, incomplete data that are difficult to mesh with the more continuous quantitative data sets provided by scientific observation. Yet historical information is essential for our understanding of long-term processes, and should thus be incorporated into our efforts to solve present and future problems. Archaeology, an inherently interdisciplinary field of knowledge that bridges the gap between the quantitative and the qualitative, can act as a connector between the study of the past and data-driven attempts to address the challenges of the future. To do so, however, we must find new ways to integrate the results of archaeological research into the digital platforms used for the modeling and analysis of much bigger data.

Planet Texas 2050 is a grand challenge project recently launched by The University of Texas at Austin. Its central goal is to understand the dynamic interactions between water supply, urbanization, energy use, and ecosystems services in Texas, a state that will be especially affected by climate change and population mobility by the middle of the 21st century. Like many such projects, one of the products of Planet Texas 2050 will be an integrated data platform that will make it possible to model various scenarios and help decision-makers project the results of present policies or trends into the future. Unlike other such projects, however, PT2050 incorporates data collected from past societies, primarily through archaeological inquiry. We are currently designing a data integration and modeling platform that will allow us to bring together quantitative sensor data related to the present environment with “fuzzier” data collected in the course of research in the social sciences and humanities. Digital archaeological data, from LiDAR surveys to genomic information to excavation documentation, will be a central component of this platform. In this paper, I discuss the conceptual integration between scientific “big data” and “medium-sized” archaeological data in PT2050; the process that we are following to catalogue data types, identify domain-specific ontologies, and understand the points of intersection between heterogeneous datasets of varying resolution and precision as we construct the data platform; and how we propose to incorporate digital data from archaeological research into integrated modeling and simulation modules.

Graph and download economic data for Population Estimate, Total, Hispanic or Latino (5-year estimate) in Big Stone County, MN (B03002012E027011) from 2009 to 2023 about Big Stone County, MN; MN; latino; hispanic; estimate; persons; 5-year; population; and USA.

This dataset presents molecular properties critical for battery electrolyte design, specifically solvation energies, ionization potentials, and electron affinities. The dataset is intended for use in machine learning model testing and algorithm validation. The properties calculated include solvation energies using the COSMO-RS method [1] and ionization potentials and electron affinities using various high-accuracy computational methods as implemented in MOLPRO [2]. Computational details can be found in Ref. [3], with scripts used to generate the data mostly uploaded to our github repository [4].

Molecular Datasets Considered:

• QM9 Dataset: Contains small organic molecules broadly relevant for quantum chemistry [5]

• Electrolyte Genome Project (EGP): Focuses on materials relevant to electrolytes.[6]

• GDB17 and ZINC databases: Offer a broad chemical diversity with potential application in battery technologies. [7, 8]

Data structure

How to Load the Data:

All files can be loaded with

import json

with open("file.json", "r") as f:
data_dict = json.load(f)

and the filestructure can be explored with

data_dict.keys()

Solvation energies

The data is stored in two types of JSON archives: files for full molecules of GDB17 and ZINC and files for amons of GDB17 and ZINC. They are structured differently as amon entries are sorted by the number of heavy atoms in the amon (e.g., all amons with 3 heavy atoms are stored in ni3). Because of the large number of amons with 6 or 7 heavy atoms,they are further split into ni6_1, ni6_2, and so on. A sub dictionary of an amon dictionary or a full molecule dictionary contains the following keys:

ECFP - ECFP4 representation vector

SMILES - SMILES string

SYMBOLS - atomic symbols

COORDS - atomic positions in Angstrom

ATOMIZATION - atomization energy in [kcal/mol]

DIPOLE - dipole moment in Debye

ENERGY - energy in Hartree

SOLVATION - solvation energy in [kcal/mol] for different solvents at 300 K.

Files:

GDB17.json.zip (unpack with unzip first!) - subset of GDB17 random molecules

AMONS_ZINC.json - all amons of ZINC up to 7 heavy atoms

EGP.json - EGP molecules

AMONS_GDB17.json - all amons of GDB17 up to 7 heavy atoms

Atomic energies $E_{at}$ at BP and def2-TZVPD level in Hartree [Ha]

We follow the convention of negative atomization energies for stablity compared to the isolated atoms:

$E_{atomization} = E_{mol} - \sum_{i} E_{at,i}$

Free energy of solvation at 300 K in [kcal/mol]:

Ionization potentials and electron affinities

The upload contains two JSON files, QM9IPEA.json and QM9IPEA_atom_ens.json. QM9IPEA.json summarizes MOLPRO calculation data grouping it along the following dictionary keys:

COORDS - atom coordinates in Angstroms.

SYMBOLS - atom element symbols.

ENERGY - total energies for each charge (0, -1, 1) and method considered.

CPU_TIME - CPU times (in seconds) spent at each step of each part of the calculation.

DISK_USAGE - highest total disk usage in GB.

ATOMIZATION_ENERGY - atomization energy at charge 0.

QM9_ID - ID of the molecule in the QM9 dataset.

All energies are given in Hartrees with NaN indicating the calculation failed to converge. Ionization potentials and electron affinities can be recovered as energy differences between neutral and charged (+1 for ionization potentials, -1 for electron affinities) species.

"CPU_time" entries contain steps corresponding to individual method calculations, as well as steps corresponding to program operation: "INT" (calculating integrals over basis functions relevant for the calculation), "FILE" (dumping intermediate data to restart file), and "RESTART" (importing restart data). The latter two steps appeared since we reused relevant integrals calculated for neutral species in charged species' calculations; we also used restart functionality to use HF density matrix obtained for the neutral species as the initial density matrix guess for the SCF-HF calculation for charged species. NaN CPU time value means the step was not present or that the calculation is invalid. Note that the CPU times were measured while parallelizing on 12 cores and were not adjusted to single-core.

QM9IPEA_atom_ens.json contains atomic energies used to calculate atomization energies in QM9IPEA.json, the dictionary keys are:

SPINS - the spin assigned to elements during calculations of atomic energies.

ENERGY - energies of atoms using different methods.

(Note that H has only one electron and thus does not require a level of theory beyond Hartree-Fock.)

NOTE: Additional calculations were performed between publication of arXiv:2308.11196 and creation of this upload. For the version of the dataset used in the manuscript, please refer to DOI:10.5281/zenodo.8252498.

Acknowledgement

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 957189 (BIG-MAP) and No. 957213 (BATTERY 2030+). O.A.v.L. has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 772834). O.A.v.L. has received support as the Ed Clark Chair of Advanced Materials and as a Canada CIFAR AI Chair. O.A.v.L. acknowledges that this research is part of the University of Toronto’s Acceleration Consortium, which receives funding from the Canada First Research Excellence Fund (CFREF). Obtaining the presented computational results has been facilitated using the queueing system implemented at https://leruli.com. The project has been supported by the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet), and the Swedish National Strategic e-Science program eSSENCE as well as by computing resources from the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC/NAISS).

References

[1] Klamt, A.; Eckert, F. COSMO-RS: a novel and efficient method for the a priori prediction of thermophysical data of liquids. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2000, 172, 43–72

[2] Werner, H.-J.; Knowles, P. J.; Knizia, G.; Manby, F. R.; Schutz, M. Molpro: a general-purpose quantum chemistry program package. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 242–253

[3] arxiv link of draft

[4] https://github.com/chemspacelab/ViennaUppDa

[5] Ramakrishnan, R.; Dral, P. O.; Rupp, M.; von Lilienfeld, O. A. Quantum chemistry structures and properties of 134 kilo molecules. Sci. Data 2014, 1, 140022

[6] Qu, X.; Jain, A.; Rajput, N. N.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, Y.; Ong, S. P.; Brafman, M.; Mag- inn, E.; Curtiss, L. A.; Persson, K. A. The Electrolyte Genome Project: A big data approach in battery materials discovery. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2015, 103, 56–67

[7] Ruddigkeit, L.; van Deursen, R.; Blum, L. C.; Reymond, J.-L. Enu- meration of 166 Billion Organic Small Molecules in the Chemical Universe Database GDB-17. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2012, 52, 2864–2875

[8] Irwin, J. J.; Shoichet, B. K. ZINC A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2005, 45, 177–182.

I. INTRODUCTION, AND IMPACT OF FINDINGS FOR FUTURE IMPLEMENTATION Outcome: A quantitative ""data-story"" can be fully expressed in qualitative form as a means of expressing the interconnected nature of variables that contribute to a networked understanding to map the constantly evolving modern Urban Landscape. Enhanced allocative, fiscal, political, and social decision making lead to almost immediate positive externalities in terms of the connected urban landscape. Constant constraints of many different forms force decision-makers to make impulsive, rushed, and consequently uninformed decisions that are based merely on presuppositions. Constant construction of pathways between seamlessly unrelated sets of information derived from the existing, historic, and quantifiable data types will bring urban decision makers solution-based and preventative vs. reactive competitive advantage . These NEW ""Measures"" that we have calculated and defined only be achieved through the expansion of PUBLIC access to unit-level, which is one of the purposes of publishing reproducible findings for this dataset. II. PURPOSE AND GOAL IN TERMS OF THE CONTRIBUTION TO UNCOVER INSIGHTS THAT HIGHLIGHT THE HOLISTIC FUNCTIONS OF THE CITY AND IMPROVE KNOWLEDGE * Incorporate big data into the study and management of the City of Boston to develop new contextually rich value-added variables through integration of additional administrative records, GIS/geographic data (shape-file/JSON), demographic data etc. * Statistically analyze and explore output generated from the integrated data to uncover correlations that will provide increased confidence levels, understandability, and interpretability in relation to the economy, direct human behavior, government policies/decision making, and the environment. * Use Practical Aggregate Measures to accelerate assimilation of, and to leverage all facets of corresponding applicable data * Finally, meticulously record, interpolate, hypothesize, and upload findings for a continuation of development. -- Replication of Citation Metadata for "Group 2": Dataset Persistent ID: doi:10.7910/DVN/PZCZSF Title: Group 2 Author: Boston Area Research Initiative, BARI (Northeastern University / Harvard University) Charan Konanki, Sai (Northeastern University) Shah, Chaitya (Northeastern University) Jonah, Domenic (Northeastern University) - ORCID: 0000-0002-0212-1581

The Account-Based Marketing (ABM) market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing need for businesses to target high-value accounts with personalized marketing strategies. The shift towards a more data-driven approach to marketing, coupled with the advancements in marketing automation and analytics technologies, is fueling this expansion. While precise market sizing data is not available, considering the current market dynamics and the rapid adoption of ABM strategies across various industries, we can estimate a 2025 market size of approximately $5 billion, growing at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15% over the forecast period (2025-2033). This growth is primarily fueled by factors such as the increasing demand for personalized customer experiences, the rise of big data and analytics, and the growing adoption of cloud-based marketing solutions. Key trends include the integration of ABM with sales and customer success teams, the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) for improved targeting and personalization, and a growing focus on measuring and optimizing ABM campaign performance. Despite this growth, challenges remain. One significant restraint is the high cost of implementation and maintenance of ABM strategies, particularly for smaller businesses. Another is the need for skilled professionals with expertise in data analysis, marketing automation, and sales alignment. Segmentation within the market is primarily driven by deployment mode (cloud-based vs. on-premise), organization size (small, medium, large enterprises), and industry vertical. Major players like HubSpot, Marketo, and Demandbase are driving innovation and market penetration, while new entrants are continually emerging with specialized solutions focusing on specific niches. The regional distribution of the market is largely concentrated in North America and Europe, with Asia-Pacific and other regions showing significant potential for future growth. The continued focus on improving ROI measurement and demonstrating the value of ABM will be crucial for sustaining this market's impressive growth trajectory.

Competitive intelligence monitoring goes beyond your sales team. Our CI solutions also bring powerful insights to your production, logistics, operation & marketing departments.

Why should you use our Competitive intelligence data? 1. Increase visibility: Our geolocation approach allows us to “get inside” any facility in the US, providing visibility in places where other solutions do not reach. 2. In-depth 360º analysis: Perform a unique and in-depth analysis of competitors, suppliers and customers. 3. Powerful Insights: We use alternative data and big data methodologies to peel back the layers of any private or public company. 4. Uncover your blind spots against leading competitors: Understand the complete business environment of your competitors, from third-tier suppliers to main investors. 5. Identify business opportunities: Analyze your competitor's strategic shifts and identify unnoticed business opportunities and possible threats or disruptions. 6. Keep track of your competitor´s influence around any specific area: Maintain constant monitoring of your competitors' actions and their impact on specific market areas.

How other companies are using our CI Solution? 1. Enriched Data Intelligence: Our Market Intelligence data bring you key insights from different angles. 2. Due Diligence: Our data provide the required panorama to evaluate a company’s cross-company relations to decide whether or not to proceed with an acquisition. 3. Risk Assessment: Our CI approach allows you to anticipate potential disruptions by understanding behavior in all the supply chain tiers. 4. Supply Chain Analysis: Our advanced Geolocation approach allows you to visualize and map an entire supply chain network. 5. Insights Discovery: Our relationship identifiers algorithms generate data matrix networks that uncover new and unnoticed insights within a specific market, consumer segment, competitors' influence, logistics shifts, and more.

From "digital" to the real field: Most competitive intelligence companies focus their solutions analysis on social shares, review sites, and sales calls. Our competitive intelligence strategy consists on tracking the real behavior of your market on the field, so that you can answer questions like: -What uncovered need does my market have? -How much of a threat is my competition? -How is the market responding to my competitor´s offer? -How my competitors are changing? -Am I losing or winning market?