28 datasets found
  1. a

    NDGISHUB County Roads

    • gishubdata-ndgov.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 9, 2011
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    State of North Dakota (2011). NDGISHUB County Roads [Dataset]. https://gishubdata-ndgov.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/NDGOV::ndgishub-county-roads/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 9, 2011
    Dataset authored and provided by
    State of North Dakota
    Area covered
    Description

    11/22/2024- County-wide road updates were completed in Golden Valley and Billings Counties. Intersecting routes throughout the state were cartographically realigned in preparation of MIRE intersections 6/27/2024 - The data was prepared for HPMS submittal which included updated 2023 AADT values and to keep certain segments consistent with HPMS segments, mainly sample sections and the NHS, values of "BOTH", "NHS" and "SAMPLE" were added to the field HPMS_ROUTE_ID to distinguish these segments from other segments. 3/19/2024 - Miscellaneous updates were done in Dunn County. County wide updates to Grand Forks and Golden Valley counties along with route realignments at intersections throughout the state.12/04/2023 - County wide updates to Walsh, Dunn and Grand Forks Counties and various updates to county/local roads throughout the state including street names in Westhope8/23/2023 - Function Class changes were updated in McLean and Mountrail Counties. Function Class updates also occurred in the cities of Fargo, Valley City, West Fargo and Williston. County-wide updates completed for: Towner, Cavalier, Pembina, Pierce, Benson, Ramsey. 2022 AADTs updated. A road was also removed in Bottineau County at the request off a landowner.5/19/22 - Dunn County contacted the NDDOT with data updates ,Rolette County was updated, and the 2021 AADT's were updated. 2/14/22 - Contacted by the Dunn County Road Dept., updates were made on newly paved road segments. 1/20/2022 - Since the August 2021 update, Morton, Stark, Hettinger, Bowman, Adams, Slope, Grant and Sioux Counties have been updated using 2020 imagery. Surface type has been checked and updated on all functionally classified roads statewide. Function Class changes have been made in the Bismarck/Mandan Metro, Grand Forks County and Burleigh County.6/15/21 - Since the 2019 update, trails and seldom used trails were updated statewide using 2018,and 2019 imagery. Steele, Traill and Griggs Counties have also been updated using 2020 imagery. Surface type has been checked and updated on all functionally classified roads statewide New roads added includes roads in the Fargo, West Fargo, Grand Forks, Jamestown, Bismarck, Mandan, Minot, Dickinson, Watford City and Williston. Ownership on Federal jurisdiction roads were also updated based on an dataset received for FHWA in conjunction with the HPMS submittal. HPMS (Highway Performance Monitoring System) fields were also added in an effort to integrate the roads county data into HPMS and MIRE (Model Inventory Roadway Elements). 9/14/20 - Added the following fields - AADT, AADT_YR, HPMS_MAINTENANCE_OPERATIONS, HPMS_THROUGH_LANES, FUNCTIONAL_CLASS (replaces FUNCTION_CLASS)8/13/19 - The following counties were updated by using a variety of aerial photography: Eddy, Foster and Barnes. Seldom used trails have been added to Barnes, Benson, Billings, Bottineau, and Bowman Counties. Mercer County had (2) 61STAvenues, this has been corrected.12/26/18 - The following counties have had their roads updated by a variety of aerial photography, McHenry, Wells, Kidder, Cass (with aid of Cass county website) and McKenzie (with aid of McKenzie County GIS Coordinator)8/14/18 - Counties updated using 2017 NAIP Imagery are Ward, Mountrail, Burke and Renville counties. Seldom used trails are also being digitized into the dataset. They are being added as counties are being checked, so it will take some time for all seldom used trails to be added statewide. Also since the last update, all local roads that are in the corporate boundaries have been broken at the boundaries so it is easier to query to determine which roads go with each community.5/21/18 - removed CITY_INT_ID column - no longer used because of CITY_FIPS and HPMS_URBAN_CODE attributes. Removed SERVICE_LEVEL field, never used/maintained.4/19/18 - added HPMS_OWNERSHIP and HPMS_FACILITY fields for HPMS submittal1/24/18 - added CITY_FIPS and HPMS_URBAN_CODE attributes/domains. These columns will replace CITY_INT_ID and SOURCE_ID columns (eventually).11/15/17 - Williams, Divide and Bottineau counties have been updated. Great effort has been taken to update attributes and QC null fields. Functional Classified roads in Bismarck and Mandan have been updated as have local roads in Bismarck, Mandan, Williston, Fargo – West Fargo and Minot. 1/25/17 - started to maintain roads in Esri's Road and Highways. The shapes now contain measures in miles along with the associated linear referencing/roads and highways fields. Removed INSET_ASSOC field and added COUNTY_FIPS field.Updates include the counties of Emmons, Logan, McIntosh, Lamoure, Dickey, Ransom, Sargent and Richland. These counties were updated using a combination of the available NAIP aerials, the DES aerials, and by car within the insets. In addition to these updates, the whole county dataset was edited using Data Reviewer checks. The checks ran included unnecessary nodes, non-linear segments, invalid geometry, Duplicate vertices with a tolerance of .5 meters, polyline closes of self, checked for cutbacks using a 15 degree minimum angle, checked for polyline length check using a distance less than 10 meters, checked for multipart lines, inspected dangles with a tolerance of 10 meters, and checked for orphans. All checks were inspected and fixed where appropriate.7/16/14 - updates include: Traill, Barnes, Stutsman, Kidder, Bowman, Slope, Stark, Hettinger, Adams, Grant, Sioux and Morton. These datasets were updated using a combination of the available NAIP aerials, the DES aerials, and by car within the insets.10/22/12 - city streets were updated in Bismarck, Dickinson, Minot and Williston. GIS data from the city of Bismarck was used to update Bismarck, GIS data and 2012 aerial photography was used to update the city of Williston, Minot’s city map and the 2010 aerial photography from Ward County was used to update Minot, and 2011 aerial photography and Dickinson’s "working" city map was used to update Dickinson. The counties updated were Williams, Burke, Bottineau, Mountrail, Ward, Wells, Eddy, Foster, Griggs, Steele, and Cass. At the time of this updated, approximately 50% of Stutsman and 50% of Traill Counties are updated. Williams, Bottineau, Ward, and Mountrail roads were inspected from the air and the 2009 NAIP photos were also used to assist the updates. The roads in Williams County were also recoded to match Williams County naming conventions. Williams County CADD map which is on the Williams county web site was used in updating the road names. In Ward County, the 2010 image from Ward County was used to assist in updating Ward County. The 2010 NAIP photos were used to update Wells, Eddy, Foster, Griggs and Steele Counties. Cass was updated with the assistance of the Cass County GIS layer and the 2011 Cass county imagery. 10/3/2011 - County roads were edited in the cities of Fargo, West Fargo, Horace, Minot, Bismarck, Devils Lake, Grafton, Williston, Valley City, and Dickinson. Also, a part of Ward and Mchenry Counties was edited and the county of Renville has been updated. The business routes through Bismarck and Jamestown were also edited. 5/9/2011 - Updated streets in Bismarck, Mandan, Jamestown, Dickinson, West Fargo ( not quite finished yet), and Valley City. Also, corrected the north - south roads in Township 144N Ranges 49 - 53 E, (in Traill County) 10/5/10 - The original Roads_County data was maintained in two separate ArcInfo coverages and then combined each year and exported to the NDHUB infrastructure. These two coverages have now been combined into one SDE feature class and is being edited within the SDE environment. The following changes have been made to feature class. Deleted all the A1 and A2 Fields so a person would have to hunt back and forth to find a road name. Road names consist of the following fields: RTE_ID, STR_TYP, SUF_DIR, & LAN_DIR. The CMC route numbers were moved from the A1_ prefixed fields to the CMC field to better track the CMC route. Created a County Highway field so we can enter the county road number. It consists of the counties name and number. This is still a work in progress. Created FS_RD_Number and FS_RD_Name fields to better track Forest Service roads. Created Bia-RD_Number and BIA_RD_Name fields to better track Bureau of Indian Affairs roads. The following field changes are used for NDDOT specific processes: Created a service level field which is something that may be used in the future. Currently it contains how Walsh County prioritizes their roads. Created a Through and Connecting Route field so we can so select routes through the towns and cities. This was created exclusively for the county base maps. Created an Inset Associated field. This was created so the information in the rd_misc would come into the county routes. In the future, it is planned to be deleted. 6/18/09 - Updated county routes from aerial observation and photo interpretation using 2003, 2005, 2006 NAIP photos and 2008 photography from Designs camera. Counties updated were Golden Valley, Billings, McKenzie, Dunn, Mercer, Oliver, McLean, Sheridan and Burleigh. City streets were rectified in these counties using the 2003 NAIP photos. Observations were performed by Steven Nelson. 4/17/08 - Updated road surface types in NE. Rolette, Pierce, Benson, Towner, Ramsey, Cavalier, Pembina, Walsh, Grand Forks and Nelson from the 2006 aerial observations by Dewaine Olson 2/13/07 - Updated via 2004 NAIP photos: Barnes, Cass, Eddy, Foster, Griggs, Kidder, Steele, Stutsman, Traill, Wells. Combined Misc Roads and County Roads. Blank fields mean unknown attribute. Use P_STREET_NAME for dynamic labeling. We are also in the process of removing all proposed roads. 12/28/05 - Counties updated: Emmons, Logan, Mcintosh, Lamoure, Dickey, Ransom, Sargent, Richland, Divide, Williams, Burke, Mountrail, Ward, Renville, Bottineau, and Mchenry This data came from the NDDOT's Mapping Section. The original data was digitized from hand scribed maps and registered

  2. a

    Syracuse Parcel Map (2024 Q3)

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • data.syr.gov
    Updated Aug 26, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    admin_syr (2024). Syracuse Parcel Map (2024 Q3) [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/d68de5fb5df14a86829980a195ff7a6c
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 26, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    admin_syr
    Area covered
    Description

    We are also including a tabular version that’s slightly more comprehensive (would include anything that didn’t join to the parcel basefile due to lot alterations or resubdivisions since 2023 and/or due to parcels comprised of condos). This Excel file can be downloaded HERE, and does not contain the latitude and longitude information.Data Dictionary: Attribute Label Definition Source

    TAX_ID Unique 26 character property tax identification number Onondaga County Planning

    PRINTKEY Abbreviated tax identification number (section-block-lot) Onondaga County Planning

    ADDRESSNUM Property’s physical street address Onondaga County Planning

    ADDRESSNAM Property’s physical street name Onondaga County Planning

    LAT Latitude Onondaga County Planning

    LONG Longitude Onondaga County Planning

    TAX_ID_1 City Tax ID number (26 digit number used for parcel mapping) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    SBL Property Tax Map Number (Section, Block, Lot) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    PNUMBR Property Number (10 digit number) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    StNum Parcel street number City of Syracuse - Assessment

    StName Parcel street name City of Syracuse - Assessment

    FullAddress Street number and street name City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Zip Parcel zip code City of Syracuse - Assessment

    desc_1 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment

    desc_2 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment

    desc_3 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment

    SHAPE_IND

    City of Syracuse - Assessment

    LUC_parcel New York State property type classification code assigned by assessor during each roll categorizing the property by use. For more details: https://www.tax.ny.gov/research/property/assess/manuals/prclas.htm City of Syracuse - Assessment

    LU_parcel New York State property type classification name City of Syracuse - Assessment

    LUCat_Old Legacy land use category that corresponds to the overarching NYS category, i.e. all 400s = commercial, all 300s = vacant land, etc. NA

    land_av Land assessed value City of Syracuse - Assessment

    total_av Full assessed value City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Owner Property owner name (First, Initial, Last, Suffix) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Add1_OwnPOBox Property owner mailing address (PO Box) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Add2_OwnStAdd Property owner mailing address (street number, street name, street direction) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Add3_OwnUnitInfo Property owner mailing address unit info (unit name, unit number) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Add4_OwnCityStateZip Property owner mailing address (city, state or country, zip code) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    FRONT Front footage for square or rectangular shaped lots and the effective front feet on irregularly shaped lots in feet City of Syracuse - Assessment

    DEPTH Actual depth of rectangular shaped lots in feet (irregular lots are usually measured in acres or square feet) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    ACRES Number of acres (where values were 0, acreage calculated as FRONT*DEPTH)/43560) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    yr_built Year built. Where year built was "0" or null, effective year built is given. (Effective age is determined by comparing the physical condition of one building with that of other like-use, newer buildings. Effective age may or may not represent the actual year built; if there have been constant upgrades or excellent maintenance this may be more recent than the original year built.) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    n_ResUnits Number of residential units NA - Calculated field

    IPSVacant Is it a vacant structure? ("Commercial" or "Residential" = Yes; null = No) City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

    IPS_Condition Property Condition Score assigned to vacant properties by housing inspectors during routine vacant inspections (1 = Worst; 5 = Best) City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

    NREligible National Register of Historic Places Eligible ("NR Eligible (SHPO)," or "NR Listed") City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    LPSS Locally Protected Site Status ("Eligible/Architecturally Significant" or "Local Protected Site or Local District") City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    WTR_ACTIVE Water activity code ("I" = Inactive; "A" = Active) City of Syracuse - Water

    RNI Is property located in Resurgent Neighborhood Initiative (RNI) Area? (1 = Yes; 0 = No) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    DPW_Quad Geographic quadrant property is located in. Quadrants are divided Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and Southeast based on property location in relation to I-81 and I-690. DPW uses the quad designation for some types of staff assignments. City of Syracuse - Department of Public Works

    TNT_NAME TNT Sector property is located in City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    NHOOD City Neighborhood Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    NRSA Is property located in Neighborhood Revitilization Strategy Area (NRSA)? (1 = Yes; 0 = No) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    DOCE_Area Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    ZONE_DIST_PREV Former zoning district code Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    REZONE ReZone designation (adopted June 2023) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    New_CC_DIST Current Common Council District property is located in Onondaga County Board of Elections

    CTID_2020 Census Tract ID (2020) U.S. Census Bureau

    CTLAB_2020 Census Tract Label (2020) U.S. Census Bureau

    CT_2020 Census Tract (2020) U.S. Census Bureau

    SpecNhood Is property located in a special Neighborhood historic preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No) Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    InPD Is property located in preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No) Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    PDNAME Preservation District name Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    ELECT_DIST Election district number Onondaga County Board of Elections

    CITY_WARD City ward number Onondaga County Board of Elections

    COUNTY_LEG Onondaga County Legislative District number (as of Dec 2022) Onondaga County Board of Elections

    NYS_ASSEMB New York State Assembly District number (as of Dec 2022) Onondaga County Board of Elections

    NYS_SENATE New York State Senate District number (as of Dec 2022) Onondaga County Board of Elections

    US_CONGR United States Congressional District number Onondaga County Board of Elections

    Dataset Contact InformationOrganization: Neighborhood & Business DevelopmentPosition:Data Program ManagerCity:Syracuse, NYE-Mail Address:opendata@syrgov.netPlease note there is a data quality issue in this iteration with the preservation district (“InPD,” “PDNAME”) and special neighborhood historic district (“SpecNhood”) fields erroneously showing null results for all parcels.

  3. Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania County...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated May 3, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Park Service (2025). Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania County Battlefields Memorial National Military Park and Vicinity, Virginia (NPS, GRD, GRI, FRSP, FRSP digital map) adapted from a U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Investigations Series Map by Mixon, Pavlides, Powars, Froelich, Weems, Schindler, Newell, Edwards and Ward (2000) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/digital-geologic-gis-map-of-fredericksburg-and-spotsylvania-county-battlefields-memorial-n
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 3, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Park Servicehttp://www.nps.gov/
    Area covered
    Spotsylvania County, Fredericksburg, Virginia
    Description

    The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania County Battlefields Memorial National Military Park and Vicinity, Virginia is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) an ESRI file geodatabase (frsp_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro 3.X map file (.mapx) file (frsp_geology.mapx) and individual Pro 3.X layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) a readme file (frsp_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (frsp_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (frsp_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the frsp_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri.htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (frsp_geology_metadata.txt or frsp_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:100,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 50.8 meters or 166.7 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS Pro, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

  4. s

    Syracuse Parcel Map (2024 Q1)

    • data.syr.gov
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Apr 10, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    admin_syr (2024). Syracuse Parcel Map (2024 Q1) [Dataset]. https://data.syr.gov/items/1f2ff0241886433ab5b0bfe706d0bea9
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 10, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    admin_syr
    License

    https://data.syr.gov/pages/termsofusehttps://data.syr.gov/pages/termsofuse

    Area covered
    Description

    We are also including tabular version that’s slightly more comprehensive (would include anything that didn’t join to the parcel basefile due to lot alterations or resubdivisions since 2023 and/or due to parcels comprised of condos). There are approximately 200 records that don't join to the spatial parcel file and some additional that are null in the spatial parcel file, altogether around 560 total. This Excel file can be downloaded HERE, and does not contain the latitude and longitude information.Data Dictionary:Attribute LabelDefinitionSourceTAX_IDUnique 26 character property tax identification numberOnondaga County PlanningPRINTKEYAbbreviated tax identification number (section-block-lot)Onondaga County PlanningADDRESSNUMProperty’s physical street addressOnondaga County PlanningADDRESSNAMProperty’s physical street nameOnondaga County PlanningTAX_ID_1City Tax ID number (26 digit number used for parcel mapping)City of Syracuse - AssessmentSBLProperty Tax Map Number (Section, Block, Lot)City of Syracuse - AssessmentPNUMBRProperty Number (10 digit number)City of Syracuse - AssessmentStNumParcel street numberCity of Syracuse - AssessmentStNameParcel street nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentFullAddressStreet number and street nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentZipParcel zip codeCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_1Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_2Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_3Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - AssessmentSHAPE_IND City of Syracuse - AssessmentLUC_parcelNew York State property type classification code assigned by assessor during each roll categorizing the property by use. For more details: https://www.tax.ny.gov/research/property/assess/manuals/prclas.htmCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLU_parcelNew York State property type classification nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLUCat_OldLegacy land use category that corresponds to the overarching NYS category, i.e. all 400s = commercial, all 300s = vacant land, etc.NAland_avLand assessed valueCity of Syracuse - Assessmenttotal_avFull assessed valueCity of Syracuse - AssessmentOwnerProperty owner name (First, Initial, Last, Suffix)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd1_OwnPOBoxProperty owner mailing address (PO Box)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd2_OwnStAddProperty owner mailing address (street number, street name, street direction)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd3_OwnUnitInfoProperty owner mailing address unit info (unit name, unit number)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd4_OwnCityStateZipProperty owner mailing address (city, state or country, zip code)City of Syracuse - AssessmentFRONTFront footage for square or rectangular shaped lots and the effective front feet on irregularly shaped lots in feetCity of Syracuse - AssessmentDEPTHActual depth of rectangular shaped lots in feet (irregular lots are usually measured in acres or square feet)City of Syracuse - AssessmentACRESNumber of acres (where values were 0, acreage calculated as FRONT*DEPTH)/43560)City of Syracuse - Assessmentyr_builtYear built. Where year built was "0" or null, effective year built is given. (Effective age is determined by comparing the physical condition of one building with that of other like-use, newer buildings. Effective age may or may not represent the actual year built; if there have been constant upgrades or excellent maintenance this may be more recent than the original year built.)City of Syracuse - Assessmentn_ResUnitsNumber of residential unitsNA - Calculated fieldIPSVacantIs it a vacant structure? ("Commercial" or "Residential" = Yes; null = No)City of Syracuse - Division of Code EnforcementIPS_ConditionProperty Condition Score assigned to vacant properties by housing inspectors during routine vacant inspections (1 = Worst; 5 = Best)City of Syracuse - Division of Code EnforcementNREligibleNational Register of Historic Places Eligible ("NR Eligible (SHPO)," or "NR Listed")City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentLPSSLocally Protected Site Status ("Eligible/Architecturally Significant" or "Local Protected Site or Local District")City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentWTR_ACTIVEWater activity code ("I" = Inactive; "A" = Active)City of Syracuse - WaterRNIIs property located in Resurgent Neighborhood Initiative (RNI) Area? (1 = Yes; 0 = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentDPW_QuadGeographic quadrant property is located in. Quadrants are divided Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and Southeast based on property location in relation to I-81 and I-690. DPW uses the quad designation for some types of staff assignments.City of Syracuse - Department of Public WorksTNT_NAMETNT Sector property is located inCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNHOODCity NeighborhoodSyracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)NRSAIs property located in Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area (NRSA)? (1 = Yes; 0 = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentDOCE_AreaGeographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement casesCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentZONE_DIST_PREVFormer zoning district codeSyracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)REZONEReZone designation (adopted June 2023)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNew_CC_DISTCurrent Common Council District property is located inOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCTID_2020Census Tract ID (2020)U.S. Census BureauCTLAB_2020Census Tract Label (2020)U.S. Census BureauCT_2020Census Tract (2020)U.S. Census BureauSpecNhoodIs property located in a special Neighborhood historic preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No)Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)InPDIs property located in preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No)Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)PDNAMEPreservation District nameSyracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)ELECT_DISTElection district numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCITY_WARDCity ward numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCOUNTY_LEGOnondaga County Legislative District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsNYS_ASSEMBNew York State Assembly District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsNYS_SENATENew York State Senate District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsUS_CONGRUnited States Congressional District numberOnondaga County Board of Elections

  5. d

    Election Districts and Precincts, Brown County maintains County Supervisor...

    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    Updated Dec 14, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2017). Election Districts and Precincts, Brown County maintains County Supervisor and Voting Ward map layers., Published in 2013, 1:1200 (1in=100ft) scale, Brown County Government.. [Dataset]. http://datadiscoverystudio.org/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/cc7ed69ec5744b348bb389d69f3a42c2/html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 14, 2017
    Description

    description: Election Districts and Precincts dataset current as of 2013. Brown County maintains County Supervisor and Voting Ward map layers..; abstract: Election Districts and Precincts dataset current as of 2013. Brown County maintains County Supervisor and Voting Ward map layers..

  6. s

    Syracuse Parcel Map (2025 Q1)

    • data.syr.gov
    Updated May 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    admin_syr (2025). Syracuse Parcel Map (2025 Q1) [Dataset]. https://data.syr.gov/items/bfbdb2d1a1474cad87f9e5078c8d9dd1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 9, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    admin_syr
    License

    https://data.syr.gov/pages/termsofusehttps://data.syr.gov/pages/termsofuse

    Area covered
    Description

    Data Dictionary: Attribute Label Definition Source

    TAX_ID Unique 26 character property tax identification number Onondaga County Planning

    SHAPE_Leng Shape length NA - Calculated field

    SHAPE_Area Shape area NA - Calculated field

    PRINTKEY Abbreviated tax identification number (section-block-lot) Onondaga County Planning

    ADDRESSNUM Property’s physical street address Onondaga County Planning

    ADDRESSNAM Property’s physical street name Onondaga County Planning

    SBL Property Tax Map Number (Section, Block, Lot) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    PNUMBR Property Number (10 digit number) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    StNum Parcel street number City of Syracuse - Assessment

    StName Parcel street name City of Syracuse - Assessment

    FullAddress Street number and street name City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Zip Parcel zip code City of Syracuse - Assessment

    desc_1 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment

    desc_2 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment

    desc_3 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment

    SHAPE_IND

    City of Syracuse - Assessment

    LUC_parcel New York State property type classification code assigned by assessor during each roll categorizing the property by use. For more details: https://www.tax.ny.gov/research/property/assess/manuals/prclas.htm City of Syracuse - Assessment

    LU_parcel New York State property type classification name City of Syracuse - Assessment

    LUCat_Old Legacy land use category that corresponds to the overarching NYS category, i.e. all 400s = commercial, all 300s = vacant land, etc. NA

    land_av Land assessed value City of Syracuse - Assessment

    total_av Full assessed value City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Owner Property owner name (First, Initial, Last, Suffix) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    OwnerFullAddress Property owner assessed address (street number, street name, street direction [or PO Box], unit name, unit number, city, state or country, zip code) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Add1_OwnPOBox Property owner mailing address (PO Box) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Add2_OwnStAdd Property owner mailing address (street number, street name, street direction) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Add3_OwnUnitInfo Property owner mailing address unit info (unit name, unit number) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Add4_OwnCityStateZip Property owner mailing address (city, state or country, zip code) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    FRONT Front footage for square or rectangular shaped lots and the effective front feet on irregularly shaped lots in feet City of Syracuse - Assessment

    DEPTH Actual depth of rectangular shaped lots in feet (irregular lots are usually measured in acres or square feet) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    ACRES Number of acres (where values were 0, acreage calculated as FRONT*DEPTH)/43560) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    yr_built Year built. Where year built was "0" or null, effective year built is given. (Effective age is determined by comparing the physical condition of one building with that of other like-use, newer buildings. Effective age may or may not represent the actual year built; if there have been constant upgrades or excellent maintenance this may be more recent than the original year built.) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    n_ResUnits Number of residential units NA - Calculated field

    IPSVacant Is it a vacant structure? ("Commercial" or "Residential" = Yes; null = No) City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

    IPS_Condition Property Condition Score assigned to vacant properties by housing inspectors during routine vacant inspections (1 = Worst; 5 = Best) City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

    NREligible National Register of Historic Places Eligible ("NR Eligible (SHPO)," or "NR Listed") City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    LPSS Locally Protected Site Status ("Eligible/Architecturally Significant" or "Local Protected Site or Local District") City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    WTR_ACTIVE Water activity code ("I" = Inactive; "A" = Active) City of Syracuse - Water

    RNI Is property located in Resurgent Neighborhood Initiative (RNI) Area? (1 = Yes; 0 = No) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    DPW_Quad Geographic quadrant property is located in. Quadrants are divided Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and Southeast based on property location in relation to I-81 and I-690. DPW uses the quad designation for some types of staff assignments. City of Syracuse - Department of Public Works

    DPW_Sani DPW sanitation trash and recycling pick-up day (trash service weekly, recycling biweekly) City of Syracuse - Department of Public Works

    DPW_Recycle DPW recycling biweekly pick-up group (either Week A or Week B), collection occurs every other week City of Syracuse - Department of Public Works

    TNT_NAME TNT Sector property is located in City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    NHOOD City Neighborhood Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    NRSA Is property located in Neighborhood Revitilization Strategy Area (NRSA)? (1 = Yes; 0 = No) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    DOCE_Insp1 Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases for housing inspectors City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

    DOCE_Insp2 Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases for building inspectors City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

    DOCE_Permit Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases for permit inspectors City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

    DOCE_Comm Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases for commercial and electrical inspectors City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

    FIRE_DIST Fire engine districts City of Syracuse - Fire Department

    ZONE_DIST_PREV Former zoning district code Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    REZONE ReZone designation (adopted June 2023, last updated 2024-12-17) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    CC_DIST Current Common Council District property is located in Onondaga County Board of Elections

    CTID_2020 Census Tract ID (2020) U.S. Census Bureau

    CTLAB_2020 Census Tract Label (2020) U.S. Census Bureau

    CT_2020 Census Tract (2020) U.S. Census Bureau

    SpecNhood Is property located in a special Neighborhood historic preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No) Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    InPD Is property located in preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No) Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    PDNAME Preservation District name Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    ELECT_DIST Election district number Onondaga County Board of Elections

    CITY_WARD City ward number Onondaga County Board of Elections

    COUNTY_LEG Onondaga County Legislative District number (as of Dec 2024) Onondaga County Board of Elections

    NYS_ASSEMB New York State Assembly District number (as of Dec 2024) Onondaga County Board of Elections

    NYS_SENATE New York State Senate District number (as of Dec 2024) Onondaga County Board of Elections

    US_CONGR United States Congressional District number Onondaga County Board of Elections

  7. s

    Syracuse Parcel Map (2024 Q4)

    • data.syr.gov
    Updated Jan 8, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    admin_syr (2025). Syracuse Parcel Map (2024 Q4) [Dataset]. https://data.syr.gov/items/addb85afc6a14daca340c4ae0077e998
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 8, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    admin_syr
    License

    https://data.syr.gov/pages/termsofusehttps://data.syr.gov/pages/termsofuse

    Area covered
    Description

    Data Dictionary:We are also including a tabular version that’s slightly more comprehensive (would include anything that didn’t join to the parcel basefile due to lot alterations or resubdivisions since 2024). This Excel file can be downloaded [HERE], and does not contain latitude and longitude information. Attribute Label Definition Source

    TAX_ID Unique 26 character property tax identification number Onondaga County Planning

    SHAPE_Leng Shape length NA - Calculated field

    SHAPE_Area Shape area NA - Calculated field

    PRINTKEY Abbreviated tax identification number (section-block-lot) Onondaga County Planning

    ADDRESSNUM Property’s physical street address Onondaga County Planning

    ADDRESSNAM Property’s physical street name Onondaga County Planning

    TAX_ID City Tax ID number (26 digit number used for parcel mapping) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    SBL Property Tax Map Number (Section, Block, Lot) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    PNUMBR Property Number (10 digit number) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    StNum Parcel street number City of Syracuse - Assessment

    StName Parcel street name City of Syracuse - Assessment

    FullAddress Street number and street name City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Zip Parcel zip code City of Syracuse - Assessment

    desc_1 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment

    desc_2 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment

    desc_3 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment

    SHAPE_IND

    City of Syracuse - Assessment

    LUC_parcel New York State property type classification code assigned by assessor during each roll categorizing the property by use. For more details: https://www.tax.ny.gov/research/property/assess/manuals/prclas.htm City of Syracuse - Assessment

    LU_parcel New York State property type classification name City of Syracuse - Assessment

    LUCat_Old Legacy land use category that corresponds to the overarching NYS category, i.e. all 400s = commercial, all 300s = vacant land, etc. NA

    land_av Land assessed value City of Syracuse - Assessment

    total_av Full assessed value City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Owner Property owner name (First, Initial, Last, Suffix) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Add1_OwnPOBox Property owner mailing address (PO Box) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Add2_OwnStAdd Property owner mailing address (street number, street name, street direction) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Add3_OwnUnitInfo Property owner mailing address unit info (unit name, unit number) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Add4_OwnCityStateZip Property owner mailing address (city, state or country, zip code) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    FRONT Front footage for square or rectangular shaped lots and the effective front feet on irregularly shaped lots in feet City of Syracuse - Assessment

    DEPTH Actual depth of rectangular shaped lots in feet (irregular lots are usually measured in acres or square feet) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    ACRES Number of acres (where values were 0, acreage calculated as FRONT*DEPTH)/43560) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    yr_built Year built. Where year built was "0" or null, effective year built is given. (Effective age is determined by comparing the physical condition of one building with that of other like-use, newer buildings. Effective age may or may not represent the actual year built; if there have been constant upgrades or excellent maintenance this may be more recent than the original year built.) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    n_ResUnits Number of residential units NA - Calculated field

    IPSVacant Is it a vacant structure? ("Commercial" or "Residential" = Yes; null = No) City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

    IPS_Condition Property Condition Score assigned to vacant properties by housing inspectors during routine vacant inspections (1 = Worst; 5 = Best) City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

    NREligible National Register of Historic Places Eligible ("NR Eligible (SHPO)," or "NR Listed") City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    LPSS Locally Protected Site Status ("Eligible/Architecturally Significant" or "Local Protected Site or Local District") City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    WTR_ACTIVE Water activity code ("I" = Inactive; "A" = Active) City of Syracuse - Water

    RNI Is property located in Resurgent Neighborhood Initiative (RNI) Area? (1 = Yes; 0 = No) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    DPW_Quad Geographic quadrant property is located in. Quadrants are divided Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and Southeast based on property location in relation to I-81 and I-690. DPW uses the quad designation for some types of staff assignments. City of Syracuse - Department of Public Works

    DPW_Sani DPW sanitation trash and recycling pick-up day (trash service weekly, recycling biweekly) City of Syracuse - Department of Public Works

    DPW_Recycle DPW recycling biweekly pick-up group (either Week A or Week B), collection occurs every other week City of Syracuse - Department of Public Works

    TNT_NAME TNT Sector property is located in City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    NHOOD City Neighborhood Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    NRSA Is property located in Neighborhood Revitilization Strategy Area (NRSA)? (1 = Yes; 0 = No) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    DOCE_Insp1 Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases for housing inspectors City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

    DOCE_Insp2 Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases for building inspectors City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

    DOCE_Permit Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases for permit inspectors City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

    DOCE_Comm Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases for commercial and electrical inspectors City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

    FIRE_DIST Fire engine districts City of Syracuse - Fire Department

    ZONE_DIST_PREV Former zoning district code Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    REZONE ReZone designation (adopted June 2023, last updated 2024-12-17) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    CC_DIST Current Common Council District property is located in Onondaga County Board of Elections

    CTID_2020 Census Tract ID (2020) U.S. Census Bureau

    CTLAB_2020 Census Tract Label (2020) U.S. Census Bureau

    CT_2020 Census Tract (2020) U.S. Census Bureau

    SpecNhood Is property located in a special Neighborhood historic preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No) Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    InPD Is property located in preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No) Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    PDNAME Preservation District name Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    ELECT_DIST Election district number Onondaga County Board of Elections

    CITY_WARD City ward number Onondaga County Board of Elections

    COUNTY_LEG Onondaga County Legislative District number (as of Dec 2024) Onondaga County Board of Elections

    NYS_ASSEMB New York State Assembly District number (as of Dec 2024) Onondaga County Board of Elections

    NYS_SENATE New York State Senate District number (as of Dec 2024) Onondaga County Board of Elections

    US_CONGR United States Congressional District number Onondaga County Board of Elections

    LAT Parcel latitude (centroid y-coordinate) in decimal degrees NA - Calculated field

    LONG Parcel longitude (centroid x-coordinate) in decimal degrees NA - Calculated field

  8. a

    City Council Outlines

    • kitsap-od-kitcowa.hub.arcgis.com
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Mar 14, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kitsap County GIS (2023). City Council Outlines [Dataset]. https://kitsap-od-kitcowa.hub.arcgis.com/maps/KitCoWA::city-council-outlines
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 14, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Kitsap County GIS
    Area covered
    Description

    City council/ward districts. Boundaries were obtained from the jurisdiction and used to generate the present data set to be spatially accurate and adjusted to the County's parcel base map. Boundaries will be updated as annexations occur, and adjusted as needed to the parcel map.

  9. s

    Syracuse Parcel Map (2023 Q4)

    • data.syr.gov
    Updated Feb 6, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    admin_syr (2024). Syracuse Parcel Map (2023 Q4) [Dataset]. https://data.syr.gov/datasets/6aad653972b54d6baaccdbedd767a6df
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 6, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    admin_syr
    Area covered
    Description

    Data Dictionary: AttributeLabelDefinitionSourceTAX_IDUnique 26 character property taxOnondaga County PlanningPRINTKEYAbbreviated tax identification number (section-block-lot)Onondaga County PlanningEASTGRIDEast grid coordinate of centroid in feetOnondaga County PlanningNORTHGRIDNorth grid coordinate of centroid in feetOnondaga County PlanningTAX_ID_1City Tax ID number (26 digit number used for parcel mapping)City of Syracuse - AssessmentSBLProperty Tax Map Number (Section, Block, Lot)City of Syracuse - AssessmentPNUMBRProperty Number (10 digit number)City of Syracuse - AssessmentStNumParcel street numberCity of Syracuse - AssessmentStNameParcel street nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentFullAddressStreet number and street nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentZipParcel zip codeCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_1Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_2Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_3Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - AssessmentSHAPE_INDCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLUC_parcelNew York State property type classification code assigned by assessor during each roll. For more details: https://www.tax.ny.gov/research/property/assess/manuals/prclas.htmCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLU_parcelNew York State property type classification nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLUCat_OldLegacy land use category that corresponds to the overarching NYS category, i.e. all 400s = commercial, all 300s = vacant land, etc. City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Developmentland_avLand valueCity of Syracuse - Assessmenttotal_avFull valueCity of Syracuse - AssessmentOwnerProperty owner name (First, Initial, Last, Suffix)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd1_OwnPOProperty owner mailing address (PO Box)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd2_OwnStProperty owner mailing address (street number, street name, street direction)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd3_OwnUnProperty owner mailing address unit info (unit name, unit number)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd4_OwnCiProperty owner mailing address (city, state or country, zip code)City of Syracuse - AssessmentFRONTFront footage for square or rectangular shaped lots and the effective front feet on irregularly shaped lots in feetCity of Syracuse - AssessmentDEPTH_1Actual depth of rectangular shaped lots in feet (irregular lots are usually measured in acres or square feet)City of Syracuse - AssessmentACRES_1Number of acres (where values were 0, acreage calculated as FRONT*DEPTH)/43560)City of Syracuse - Assessmentyr_builtYear builtCity of Syracuse - AssessmentIPSVacantIs it a vacant structure? ("Commercial" or "Residential" = Yes; null = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentIPS_ConditProperty Condition Score assigned to vacant properties by housing inspectors during routine vacant inspections (1 = Worst; 5 = Best)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNREligibleNational Register of Historic Places Eligible ("NR Eligible (SHPO)," or "NR Listed")City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentLPSSLocally Protected Site Status ("Eligible/Architecturally Significant" or "Local Protected Site or Local District")City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentWTR_ACTIVEWater activity code ("I" = Inactive; "A" = Active)City of Syracuse - WaterRNIIs property located in Resurgent Neighborhood Initiative (RNI) Area? (1 = Yes; 0 = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentDPW_QuadGeographic quadrant property is located in. Quadrants are divided Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and Southeast based on property location in relation to I-81 and I-690. DPW uses the quad designation for some types of staff assignments.City of Syracuse - Department of Public WorksTNT_NAMETNT Sector property is located inCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNHOODCity NeighborhoodCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNRSAIs property located in Neighborhood Revitilization Strategy Area (NRSA)? (1 = Yes; 0 = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentDOCE_AreaGeographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement casesCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentZONE_DIST_Former zoning district codeCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentREZONEReZone designation (adopted June 2023)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNew_CC_DISTCurrent Common Council District property is located inCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentCTID_2020Census Tract ID (2020)U.S. Census BureauCTLAB_2020Census Tract Label (2020)U.S. Census BureauCT_2020Census Tract (2020)U.S. Census BureauSpecNhoodIs property located in a special Neighborhood historic preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentInPDIs property located in preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentPDNAMEPreservation District nameCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentELECT_DISTElection district numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCITY_WARDCity ward numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCOUNTY_LEGOnondaga County Legislative District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsNYS_ASSEMBNew York State Assembly District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsNYS_SENATENew York State Senate District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsUS_CONGRUnited States Congressional District numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsDataset Contact InformationOrganization: Neighborhood & Business DevelopmentPosition:Data Program ManagerCity:Syracuse, NYE-Mail Address:opendata@syrgov.net

  10. a

    NDGISHUB City Boundaries

    • gishubdata-ndgov.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Oct 9, 2012
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    State of North Dakota (2012). NDGISHUB City Boundaries [Dataset]. https://gishubdata-ndgov.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/ndgishub-city-boundaries/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 9, 2012
    Dataset authored and provided by
    State of North Dakota
    Area covered
    Description

    12/06/2024 - Updates to Ellendale, Fargo, Kindred, Lincoln, Mandan, Rugby and Tappen.12/06/2024 - Update to Lincoln and Bismarck Corporate Boundaries based on requests from Lincoln.6/27/2024 - Update to the Valley City and Dickinson Corporate Boundary based on requests from their GIS personal.4/8/2024 - Update to the Valley City Corporate Boundary12/04/2023 - Update to Fargo City Boundary7/23/2023 - Removed Church’s Ferry due to proclamation and notice of dissolution.7/01/2023 - Changes to Binford - Ordinance 51; Lidgerwood - Ordinance 2022-1; Killdeer Golf Course annexation; Bismarck based on current City of Bismarck GIS boundary9/26/2022 - Changes to Steele boundary per Kidder County 911 coordinator.9/23/2022 - Updates to Grand Forks, Mandan and Fargo7/01/2022 - Updates to Killdeer, Mandan and Williston per State Tax Dept changes. 2/14/2022- Updates to Minot -13th ST SE/31st AVE SE, Updates to Elgin, Horace and St. John.11/16/2021 -Updates to Bismarck, Fargo and Killdeer based on city ordinances.7/2/21 – Changes were made to the City of Bismarck, Fargo and Hillsboro to include local taxing jurisdiction boundary changes from the State Tax Commissioner.5/4/21 - Updates were made to the City of Wahpeton due to an annexation.4/29/21 - Updated Minot and Makoti3/5/21 - Updated an annexation to Arnegard that was submitted to the DOT by Mackenzie's County Public Works GIS Coordinator.1/21/21 - Update to Sentinel Butte per Golden Valley 911 Coordinator7/17/20 - Updates to Bismarck, Linton and Stanley6/1/20 - Updates to Killdeer, New Town and Surrey1/17/2020 - Boundary changes have been updated for Bismarck, Bowman Fargo, Garrison, Linton, and New Salem.3/5/19 - The corporate boundary of Surrey has been updated.12/26/18 - The following corporate boundaries have been updated: Bismarck, Lincoln, Grand Forks, Horace, Casselton, Fargo, Oxbow, Tioga and Stanley.6/19/18 - City of Maza is not incorporated based on the 2011-2013 North Dakota Blue book. Removed Maza.5/14/18 - Updated Dickinson, Watford City, Berthold, Minnewauken, and Cavalier.1/31/18 - Updated Dickinson, Mandan, Minot, Tioga, Devils Lake, Belfield, Washburn, Mohall, Minnewauken, Lincoln, Bismarck and Casselton. 10/24/17 - Updated Watford City and Makoti10/16/17 - The following cities have been updated: Jamestown, Milnor, Bismarck, Carrington, Casselton, Mandan, Minot, Stanley, Larimore, Crosby, and Watford City.1/10/17 - The following cities have been updated: Lehr, Grand Forks, Langdon, Drayton, Flasher, Glen Ullin, Watford City, Zap, Lignite, Hankinson, Beach, Underwood, South Heart, Devils Lake, all cities in Ward County, Cavalier, Bismarck, Lincoln, Fargo, West Fargo, Ayr, Briarwood, Casselton, Davenport, Enderlin, Grandin, Horace, and North River.9/19/16 - Updated the following cities: Watford City, Steele, Richardton, Berthold, Carpio, Burlington, Des Lacs, Donnybrook, Douglas, Kenmare, Makoti, Ryder, Sawyer, and Surrey.6/23/16 - Updated cities are as follows: All cities in Pembina, Morton, Richland, and Williams Counties. The cities of Bismarck, West Fargo, Harwood, Oxbow, Beach, Minot, Stanley, Jamestown, Fargo, Dickinson and New Town.9/28/15 - The following cites have had annexation: Stanley, Bottineau, Minot, Casselton, Belfield and Watford City.7/24/15 - Updated Grafton, Stanley, Bismarck, Williston, Horace, Fargo, Grand Forks, Watford City, Turtle Lake, Leeds, Maxbass and Medora1/16/15 - Updated Grafton, Stanley and Bismarck.11/3/2014 - Updated Bismarck, Mandan, Minot, Stanley, and Watford City7/16/14 - Corporate limits updated include: Mandan, Towner, Fargo, West Fargo, Grand Forks, Bismarck, Bowman, Watford City, Stanley, Tioga, Kenmare, Casselton, Minot, Carrington, Kindred, and Killdeer. The corporate limit updates consisted of receiving from the cities, shape files, CADD files, scanned images of annexations or by converting pdf files into images, rectifying them within ArcGIS, then heads-up digitizing. 7/29/13 - updated Stanley, Williston, Minot, and Bismarck.4/30/13 - updated Williston, Hazen, Minot, Dickinson, Valley City, Velva, Rugby, Bismarck, and Lincoln1/28/13 - updated Valley City, Grand Forks, Bismarck, Williston, Jamestown, Harvey, Mohall, Park River, Ray, Rugby, Stanley, Tioga, Mayville and Glenfield10/9/12 - updated Williston and Dickinson6/20/12 - updated Williston via shapefile from city.3/20/12 - updated Bismarck and Minot10/3/2011 - Edited corporate limits for Bottineau, Grand Forks, Bismarck, Grafton, Fargo, West Fargo, Horace, Dickinson, Williston, Valley City and Devils Lake.2/4/11 - Removed urban areas so only corporate boundaries remain. Removed boolean field named URBAN_AREA. Updated corporate limist in Dickinson and cities with Cass county. 6/24/10 - Stanley, Lincoln, Oakes, Hankinson, Enderlin, Ellendale, Linton, Carrington, Minot, and Kulm corportate limits were changed 6/18/09 - Stanley, Wahpeton, Center, Watford City, Williston, Grand Forks, Killdeer, Beulah, Beach, Hazen, Garrison, Washburn, Bismarck and Lincoln corporate limits were changed 3/24/08 - Added Milton, Drayton, and Cavalier Boudaries updated: Park River 1/16/08 - Boundaries updated: Devils Lake, Glen Ullin, Langdon, Minnewaukan, Northwood, Thompson 2/13/07 - Boundaries updated: Amenia, Arthur, Bismarck, Bottineau, Buffalo, Casstleton, Davenport, Dickinson, Enderlin, Gardner, Grand Forks, Grandin, Harvey, Harvey, Hillsboro, Horace, Hunter, Jamestown, Kindred, Mapleton, Mayville, New Rockford, Oxbox, Page, Prairie Rose, Relies Acres, Tappen, Towner City 1/10/06 - Boundaries updated: Wishek, Fargo, Lincoln, Bottineau, Williston, Grand Forks, Granville, Velva, Stanley, urban areas in Fargo, West Fargo, Bismarck and Mandan. Deleted Larson This data came from the NDDOT's Mapping Section. The original data was digitized from hand scribed maps and registered to the 1:24000 USGS PLSS data. It was converted from a projection (NAD 1983 UTM Zone 14N) to a Geographic coordinate system.

  11. a

    Council Ward Map (PDF) for Marysville, Ohio

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Aug 23, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Marysville, Ohio (2021). Council Ward Map (PDF) for Marysville, Ohio [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/documents/662e7a2cc7224ccf8e9bb00945b57103
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 23, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Marysville, Ohio
    License

    Public Domain Mark 1.0https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    The City of Marysville is a chartered city with a council-manager form of government. Marysville’s City Council is comprised of seven members who are each elected for a term of four years. Three members are elected at large and four members are elected by ward. To find the council members in your ward, please refer to the Ward Map. The Marysville City Council is responsible for enacting local laws and ordinances, approving the budget, establishing policies / regulations, approving programs necessary to conduct city business, and protecting the public’s general health and safety.Meetings7:00 pmSecond and fourth Monday of each monthCouncil Chambers 209 S. Main St. Marysville, OH 43040Agendas & MinutesAgendas and meeting packets are available prior to the meetings. Most Recent Agenda | View All Most Recent Meeting Packet | View All

  12. c

    Certificates of Occupancy

    • data.clevelandohio.gov
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jan 23, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Cleveland | GIS (2024). Certificates of Occupancy [Dataset]. https://data.clevelandohio.gov/datasets/certificates-of-occupancy
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 23, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Cleveland | GIS
    License

    Open Database License (ODbL) v1.0https://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This data service provides all Certificates of Occupancy (COOs) issued by Department of Building and Housing. A COO establishes the allowable use of a structure, typically for business use or housing. The records found here are from 2015 to present. Update FrequencyWeekly on Sundays at 7 AM EST (6 AM during daylight savings) ContactsDepartment of Building and Housing 216-664-2282 Data Glossary B1_ALT_ID: Record ID File Date: Date record created Parcel: Permanent parcel number of property Sub Type: Property type – residential or commercial Application Category: Type of COO – new structure, existing structure, or time limited use Application Status: Important status to note is Void, which means COO issuance not valid Inspector: Issuing Inspector C.O. ASI Type: Provides a greater description of COO along with Application Category C.O. Issue Date: Date COO issued Address: Property address Permit Number: Building permit associated with issuance of COO The below fields are not from the system of record for permits, Accela. They are extra fields produced by the City's Data Warehouse to make it more useful for staff and the public.DW_Parcel: Current Cuyahoga County parcel that matches this addressDW_Ward: Ward location of that parcelDW_Tract2020: Census tract ID of that parcelDW_Neighborhood: City neighborhood of that parcelPERMIT_ACCELA_CITIZEN_ACCESS_URL: Link to view the permit record on Accela Citizen AccessCERTIFICATE_CITIZEN_ACCESS_URL: Link to view the certificate record on Accela Citizen Access

  13. d

    ScienceBase Item Summary Page

    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    pdf
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    ScienceBase Item Summary Page [Dataset]. http://datadiscoverystudio.org/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/daf62edbe44441ee80df19bade317a7c/html
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Area covered
    Description

    no abstract provided

  14. a

    MATURE SUPPORT - Ward Boundaries for New Jersey

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • share-open-data-njtpa.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Sep 24, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    New Jersey Office of GIS (2020). MATURE SUPPORT - Ward Boundaries for New Jersey [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/b6df174950f54128bea05f8c01bd061f
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 24, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    New Jersey Office of GIS
    Area covered
    Description

    This item is in mature support and is no longer updated. Available for historical reference only. This dataset contains polygons representing voting Ward boundaries within all municipalities in the state of New Jersey. The statewide dataset was created from existing vector data maintained by Remington & Vernick Engineers, under contract with the NJ Department of State, Division of Elections and KNOWiNK, for eleven counties (in part or in whole) and from county and municipal Election District and Ward maps, tax assessment parcel GIS data, and other data sources, for the balance of the state.

  15. a

    Maricopa County City Council Districts

    • arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com
    • data-maricopa.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Aug 30, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Maricopa County Enterprise GIS (2022). Maricopa County City Council Districts [Dataset]. https://arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com/maps/Maricopa::maricopa-county-city-council-districts/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 30, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Maricopa County Enterprise GIS
    Area covered
    Description

    This dataset contains the Maricopa County, Arizona City Council District boundaries for those cities with council districts. This includes Phoenix, Surprise, Buckeye, Peoria, Glendale and Mesa.

  16. a

    Indicators of Poverty and Urban Stress by Ward

    • povreport-cotgis.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Mar 18, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Tucson (2020). Indicators of Poverty and Urban Stress by Ward [Dataset]. https://povreport-cotgis.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/indicators-of-poverty-and-urban-stress-by-ward
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 18, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Tucson
    Description

    Use this tool to view maps and comparative statistics of the main indicators from the Poverty and Urban Stress Report: poverty, income, crime, race and education. See how the data vary across wards in Tucson and zoom in on areas of interest to you.This Story Map compiles multiple map-based dashboards to show statistics on income, poverty, education, and race by ward across Tucson. Users can use the ward filters at the top of each dashboard to view just the ward they are interested in, or compare one ward to another. Each map is interactive: when individual census tracts are selected, users get details about that tract and how it compares to the rest of the ward or county. Data for the maps and graphs are from American Community Survey, which has been apportioned by ward using ESRI's summarize within tool.

  17. a

    Maricopa County Cities and Towns

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • data-maricopa.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Aug 30, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Maricopa County Enterprise GIS (2022). Maricopa County Cities and Towns [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/Maricopa::maricopa-county-cities-and-towns
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 30, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Maricopa County Enterprise GIS
    Area covered
    Description

    The cities annex feature class is intended to track city and town annexations in Maricopa County, Arizona.

  18. a

    HRA Owned Sites for Redevelopment

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • information.stpaul.gov
    Updated Jun 1, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Saint Paul GIS (2022). HRA Owned Sites for Redevelopment [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/stpaul::hra-owned-sites-for-redevelopment/explore
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Saint Paul GIS
    Area covered
    Description

    Attributes (Fields) Defined:Site Name: A name for the site. Each parcel is part of a site. Sites are an assemblage of one or more parcels that generally share geographic proximity and are marketed together as a unit. Many sites are just one parcel, but when they are more than one parcel, the parcel name (above) reflects this. Parcels within a site will share the same basic name, but be differentiated by a "#1", "#2", "#3", etc. appended to the end of the parcel name. The site name is the parcel name without the numbering at the end. In this way, in ArcGIS, a dissolve on the site name field can be run to produce an analysis by site, instead of by parcel.Alternate Site Names: Names that have been commonly used for the site, beyond the name specified in the "Site Name" field.Address: An address for a site shared by all parcels that comprise a site. This is derived from one of the parcel addresses for parcels that comprise the site, or from the addresses assigned by Public Works within a parcel, as can be seen in AMANDA or the PED Staff Map. If all parcel addresses have a street number of "0" because they are vacant, this field is to include a rough description of where the site is located in the city.Alternate Site Addresses: Additional addresses used to describe the site. This is derived from one of the parcel addresses for parcels that comprise the site. Ward: The Ward in which the site is located. This field is updated every ten years to reflect changes to Ward boundaries due to redistricting. CHOICES: 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7Planning District: The number of the Planning District in which the Site is located. The City is divided into seventeen planning districts, each served by a city-funded and city-recognized District Council. CHOICES: 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17General Description: A general description of the site, its history, current circumstances, and anything else of a summary nature that would not easily fit in other fields.Classification: This is the core means of classifying HRA-owned properties, the way the sites are marketed or not marketed, and the HRA's intended destiny for the parcels. CHOICES: Commercial - Pending Sale: Properties that are generally zoned to allow a range of commercial uses, and currently have an active offer, option, or tentative developer status.Commercial - Sold: Properties that were generally zoned to allow a range of commercial uses when last owned by the HRA, were previously owned by the HRA but that have been sold, and where the HRA retains no ownership interest.Commercial - Vacant Land: Properties that are generally zoned to allow a range of commerical uses, and have no known building or other structure.Commercial - with Building(s): Properties that are generally zoned to allow a range of commercial uses, and contain a building or other structure.Long-Term Hold: Properties that, per contractual obligations, or for other reasons, are expected to be held by the City of Saint Paul for many years, and not generally available for purchase.Long-Term Hold - Parking: Properties that are expected to be held by the City of Saint Paul for many years as parking facilities, and are not generally available for purchaseResidential - Pending Sale: Properties that are generally zoned to allow mainly residential uses, and currently have an active offer, option, or tentative developer status.Residential - Sold: Properties that were generally zoned to allow mainly residential uses when last owned by the HRA, that were previously owned by the HRA but that have been sold, and where the HRA retains no ownership interest.Residential - Vacant Land: Properties that are generally zoned to allow mainly residential uses, and have no known building or other structure.Residential - With Building(s): Properties that are generally zoned to allow mainly residential uses, and contain a building or other structure.Transfer to Other Ownership: Properties that are intended for conveyance to other ownership, such as parkland that is ultimately intended to be conveyed to the Department of Parks & Recreation, or right-of-way that most appropriately would be held by the Department of Public Works.Current Project Manager: The name of the staff responsible for managing the parcel and its future. CHOICES: Names of PED staff.SharePoint Link: A link to SharePoint storage for files related to this specific site.CharacteristicsCharacteristics - Land Assembly Considerations: Are there special considerations that apply to this site around land assembly? CHOICES: Yes • No.Characteristics - Land Assembly Considerations - Challenges & Resolutions: A description of challenges and potential resolutions around land assembly.Characteristics - Title Type: A description of the type of legal title document(s) that apply to the site. A site may have multiple title documents because it can be comprised of multiple parcels. CHOICES: Abstract • Abstract & Unknown • Torrens • Torrens & Unknown • UnknownCharacteristics - Title Issues: Are there concerns with establishing appropriate title to the project? CHOICES: Yes • NoCharacteristics - Title Challenges and Resolutions: A description of the challenges and potential resolutions around title issues.Characteristics - Estimated Market Value - Tax Year: The year for which the estimated market values (EMVs) shown in subsequent fields is used to calculate the site's total tax liability.Characteristics - Estimated Market Value - EMV Year: The year to which the estimated market values (EMVs) shown in subsequent fields applied as a representation of the site's value.Characteristics - Estimated Market Value - Land: The estimated market value (EMV) of the site's land, as determined by the Ramsey County Assessor's office, and derived from the Ramsey County Parcel Service. The Site EMV Land is obtained by adding together the individual EMV Land values for each parcel within the site. This is updated at least once per year in order to stay reasonably current with any data updates.Characteristics - Estimated Market Value - Building: The estimated market value (EMV) of the site's built structure(s), as determined by the Ramsey County Assessor's office, and derived from the Ramsey County Parcel Service. The Site EMV Building is obtained by adding together the individual EMV Building values for each parcel within the site. This is updated at least once per year in order to stay reasonably current with any data updates.Characteristics - Estimated Market Value - Total: The estimated market value (EMV) of the site's land and built structure(s), added together, as determined by the Ramsey County Assessor's office and derived from the Ramsey County Parcel Service. The Site EMV Total is obtained by adding together the individual EMV Total values for each parcel within the site. This is updated at least once per year in order to stay reasonably current with any data updates.Characteristics - Estimated Market Value - Challenges & Resolutions: A description of challenges and potential resolutions around the site's estimated market value.Characteristics - Access to Site - Support for Redevelopment: Are there issues with site accessibility? CHOICES: Yes • NoCharacteristics - Access to Site - Challenges & Resolutions: A description of challenges and potential resolutions around how site access inhibits redevelopment.Characteristics - Dimensions - Acres: The acreage of the site, as derived from the parcel geometry in GIS.Characteristics - Dimensions - Maximum Depth: The maximum depth of the site(generally measured back perpendicular from the primary street frontage).Characteristics - Dimensions - Maximum Width: The maximum width of the site (generally measured as the distance parallel to the primary street frontage).Characteristics - Dimensions - Rectangular: Is the site generally rectangular in shape? CHOICES: Yes • NoCharacteristics - Dimensions - Challenges and Resolutions: A description of challenges and potential resolutions around how site dimensions may inhibit redevelopment.Characteristics - Existing Buildings - Total Square Feet: The total square footage of the existing building(s) on the site.Characteristics - Existing Buildings - Footprint Square Feet: The building footprint square footage of the existing building(s) on the site.Characteristics - Existing Buildings - Challenges & Resolutions: A description of challenges and potential resolutions around existing buildings on the site.Characteristics - Uses - Current Use: A description of the current use on the site's parcel(s) pulled from the "LandUseCodeDescription" in the parcel feature class of the parcels that are part of the site.Characteristics - Uses - Neighboring Uses: A description of the current use directly adjacent to the site's parcel(s) pulled from the "LandUseCodeDescription" in the parcel feature class of the parcels that are part of the site.Characteristics - Uses - Restrictions: A description of any use restrictions applicable to the site upon sale.Characteristics - Uses - Funds Used: A description of the funds used and amounts on the site for acquisition and other purposes. The date on which this analysis is valid is to be denoted within the narrative description. This field is a stopgap measure until we develop better reporting mechanisms from Quickbooks and/or Infor that would more optimally pull live data from these systems of record.Characteristics - Amount of CDBG Used: The total amount of CDBG funding that has been used by the HRA on the site(which should also be accounted for in the prior field). This field is a stopgap measure until we develop better reporting mechanisms from Quickbooks and/or Infor that would more optimally pull live data from these systems of record.Characteristics - Uses - Challenges & Resolutions: A description of challenges and potential resolutions related to the existing use of the

  19. Non-Driver City, Village, and Town (2024)

    • data-wisdot.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Jan 26, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Wisconsin Dept of Transportation (2024). Non-Driver City, Village, and Town (2024) [Dataset]. https://data-wisdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/non-driver-city-village-and-town-2024
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 26, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Wisconsin Department of Transportationhttps://wisconsindot.gov/
    Authors
    Wisconsin Dept of Transportation
    Area covered
    Description

    Wisconsin municipal boundaries (cities, towns, and villages) downloaded in January 2024. This data has been collected in regards to state statute 15(4)(br)1. County clerks will transmit municipal, municipal ward, and county supervisory districts in GIS format to LTSB by January 15th and July 15th per statute 5.15(4)(br)1: "...no later than January 15 and July 15 of each year*, the county clerk shall transmit to the Legislative Technology Services Bureau a report confirming the boundaries of each municipality, ward, and supervisory district in the county together with a map of the county, in an electronic format approved by the Legislative Technology Services Bureau. Each report shall be current to the nearest January 1 or July 1* preceding the date of the report”. Municipal clerks need to notify the county clerk within 5 days of any boundary change per statute 5.15(4)(b): "Within 5 days after adoption or enactment of an ordinance or resolution under this section or any amendment thereto, the municipal clerk shall transmit one copy of the ordinance or resolution or the amendment to the county clerk of each county in which the municipality is contained, accompanied by the list and map specified in par. (a). Each copy shall identify the name of the municipality and the county or counties in which it is located." Geographic Data can be downloaded here:https://data-ltsb.opendata.arcgis.com/Census Data can be downloaded here: Census Bureau Search Income Data

    B19013 MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS (IN 2019 INFLATION-ADJUSTED DOLLARS) 2018-2022American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

    Sex by Age

    B01001 SEX BY AGE 2018-2022American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

    Race

    B02001 RACE2018-2022American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

  20. a

    WI Cities, Towns, Villages (July 2024)

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • gis-ltsb.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Sep 13, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Wisconsin State Legislature (2024). WI Cities, Towns, Villages (July 2024) [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/LTSB::wi-cities-towns-villages-july-2024/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 13, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Wisconsin State Legislature
    Area covered
    Description

    Wisconsin municipal ward data collected in July 2024 by LTSB that was dissolved into municipal boundaries (cities, towns, and villages). [Attribute Definitions]. This data has been collected in regards to state statute 15(4)(br)1. County clerks will transmit municipal, municipal ward, and county supervisory districts in GIS format to LTSB by January 15th and July 15th* per statute 5.15(4)(br)1: "...no later than January 15 and July 15 of each year*, the county clerk shall transmit to the Legislative Technology Services Bureau a report confirming the boundaries of each municipality, ward, and supervisory district in the county together with a map of the county, in an electronic format approved by the Legislative Technology Services Bureau. Each report shall be current to the nearest January 1 or July 1* preceding the date of the report”. (*with the exception of years ending in “01” where data collection will align closer to typical redistricting timelines of March and October 15)Municipal clerks need to notify the county clerk within 5 days of any boundary change per statute 5.15(4)(b): "Within 5 days after adoption or enactment of an ordinance or resolution under this section or any amendment thereto, the municipal clerk shall transmit one copy of the ordinance or resolution or the amendment to the county clerk of each county in which the municipality is contained, accompanied by the list and map specified in par. (a). Each copy shall identify the name of the municipality and the county or counties in which it is located."Municipal data collected in the January collections will be used by LTSB to update municipal boundaries the U.S. Census Bureau’s TIGER database via the Boundary Annexation Survey (BAS). Counties and municipalities are no longer required to submit boundary changes directly to the Census Bureau. LTSB will submit data to the Census Bureau for the state as a whole.Section 13.96(1)(b) of the Wisconsin Statutes requires LTSB to “upon receipt of municipal boundary information at each reporting interval, reconcile and compile the information received to produce a statewide data base consisting of municipal boundary information for the entire state”.Section 13.96(1)(c) states that LTSB shall “Participate, on behalf of this state, in geographic boundary information programs when offered by the U.S. bureau of the census”.LTSB will publish Municipal Wards, Municipal Boundaries (cities, towns, villages), and County Supervisory Districts to the LTSB HUB Data Portal.This data has been collected with the LTSB GeoData Collector.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
State of North Dakota (2011). NDGISHUB County Roads [Dataset]. https://gishubdata-ndgov.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/NDGOV::ndgishub-county-roads/about

NDGISHUB County Roads

Explore at:
Dataset updated
May 9, 2011
Dataset authored and provided by
State of North Dakota
Area covered
Description

11/22/2024- County-wide road updates were completed in Golden Valley and Billings Counties. Intersecting routes throughout the state were cartographically realigned in preparation of MIRE intersections 6/27/2024 - The data was prepared for HPMS submittal which included updated 2023 AADT values and to keep certain segments consistent with HPMS segments, mainly sample sections and the NHS, values of "BOTH", "NHS" and "SAMPLE" were added to the field HPMS_ROUTE_ID to distinguish these segments from other segments. 3/19/2024 - Miscellaneous updates were done in Dunn County. County wide updates to Grand Forks and Golden Valley counties along with route realignments at intersections throughout the state.12/04/2023 - County wide updates to Walsh, Dunn and Grand Forks Counties and various updates to county/local roads throughout the state including street names in Westhope8/23/2023 - Function Class changes were updated in McLean and Mountrail Counties. Function Class updates also occurred in the cities of Fargo, Valley City, West Fargo and Williston. County-wide updates completed for: Towner, Cavalier, Pembina, Pierce, Benson, Ramsey. 2022 AADTs updated. A road was also removed in Bottineau County at the request off a landowner.5/19/22 - Dunn County contacted the NDDOT with data updates ,Rolette County was updated, and the 2021 AADT's were updated. 2/14/22 - Contacted by the Dunn County Road Dept., updates were made on newly paved road segments. 1/20/2022 - Since the August 2021 update, Morton, Stark, Hettinger, Bowman, Adams, Slope, Grant and Sioux Counties have been updated using 2020 imagery. Surface type has been checked and updated on all functionally classified roads statewide. Function Class changes have been made in the Bismarck/Mandan Metro, Grand Forks County and Burleigh County.6/15/21 - Since the 2019 update, trails and seldom used trails were updated statewide using 2018,and 2019 imagery. Steele, Traill and Griggs Counties have also been updated using 2020 imagery. Surface type has been checked and updated on all functionally classified roads statewide New roads added includes roads in the Fargo, West Fargo, Grand Forks, Jamestown, Bismarck, Mandan, Minot, Dickinson, Watford City and Williston. Ownership on Federal jurisdiction roads were also updated based on an dataset received for FHWA in conjunction with the HPMS submittal. HPMS (Highway Performance Monitoring System) fields were also added in an effort to integrate the roads county data into HPMS and MIRE (Model Inventory Roadway Elements). 9/14/20 - Added the following fields - AADT, AADT_YR, HPMS_MAINTENANCE_OPERATIONS, HPMS_THROUGH_LANES, FUNCTIONAL_CLASS (replaces FUNCTION_CLASS)8/13/19 - The following counties were updated by using a variety of aerial photography: Eddy, Foster and Barnes. Seldom used trails have been added to Barnes, Benson, Billings, Bottineau, and Bowman Counties. Mercer County had (2) 61STAvenues, this has been corrected.12/26/18 - The following counties have had their roads updated by a variety of aerial photography, McHenry, Wells, Kidder, Cass (with aid of Cass county website) and McKenzie (with aid of McKenzie County GIS Coordinator)8/14/18 - Counties updated using 2017 NAIP Imagery are Ward, Mountrail, Burke and Renville counties. Seldom used trails are also being digitized into the dataset. They are being added as counties are being checked, so it will take some time for all seldom used trails to be added statewide. Also since the last update, all local roads that are in the corporate boundaries have been broken at the boundaries so it is easier to query to determine which roads go with each community.5/21/18 - removed CITY_INT_ID column - no longer used because of CITY_FIPS and HPMS_URBAN_CODE attributes. Removed SERVICE_LEVEL field, never used/maintained.4/19/18 - added HPMS_OWNERSHIP and HPMS_FACILITY fields for HPMS submittal1/24/18 - added CITY_FIPS and HPMS_URBAN_CODE attributes/domains. These columns will replace CITY_INT_ID and SOURCE_ID columns (eventually).11/15/17 - Williams, Divide and Bottineau counties have been updated. Great effort has been taken to update attributes and QC null fields. Functional Classified roads in Bismarck and Mandan have been updated as have local roads in Bismarck, Mandan, Williston, Fargo – West Fargo and Minot. 1/25/17 - started to maintain roads in Esri's Road and Highways. The shapes now contain measures in miles along with the associated linear referencing/roads and highways fields. Removed INSET_ASSOC field and added COUNTY_FIPS field.Updates include the counties of Emmons, Logan, McIntosh, Lamoure, Dickey, Ransom, Sargent and Richland. These counties were updated using a combination of the available NAIP aerials, the DES aerials, and by car within the insets. In addition to these updates, the whole county dataset was edited using Data Reviewer checks. The checks ran included unnecessary nodes, non-linear segments, invalid geometry, Duplicate vertices with a tolerance of .5 meters, polyline closes of self, checked for cutbacks using a 15 degree minimum angle, checked for polyline length check using a distance less than 10 meters, checked for multipart lines, inspected dangles with a tolerance of 10 meters, and checked for orphans. All checks were inspected and fixed where appropriate.7/16/14 - updates include: Traill, Barnes, Stutsman, Kidder, Bowman, Slope, Stark, Hettinger, Adams, Grant, Sioux and Morton. These datasets were updated using a combination of the available NAIP aerials, the DES aerials, and by car within the insets.10/22/12 - city streets were updated in Bismarck, Dickinson, Minot and Williston. GIS data from the city of Bismarck was used to update Bismarck, GIS data and 2012 aerial photography was used to update the city of Williston, Minot’s city map and the 2010 aerial photography from Ward County was used to update Minot, and 2011 aerial photography and Dickinson’s "working" city map was used to update Dickinson. The counties updated were Williams, Burke, Bottineau, Mountrail, Ward, Wells, Eddy, Foster, Griggs, Steele, and Cass. At the time of this updated, approximately 50% of Stutsman and 50% of Traill Counties are updated. Williams, Bottineau, Ward, and Mountrail roads were inspected from the air and the 2009 NAIP photos were also used to assist the updates. The roads in Williams County were also recoded to match Williams County naming conventions. Williams County CADD map which is on the Williams county web site was used in updating the road names. In Ward County, the 2010 image from Ward County was used to assist in updating Ward County. The 2010 NAIP photos were used to update Wells, Eddy, Foster, Griggs and Steele Counties. Cass was updated with the assistance of the Cass County GIS layer and the 2011 Cass county imagery. 10/3/2011 - County roads were edited in the cities of Fargo, West Fargo, Horace, Minot, Bismarck, Devils Lake, Grafton, Williston, Valley City, and Dickinson. Also, a part of Ward and Mchenry Counties was edited and the county of Renville has been updated. The business routes through Bismarck and Jamestown were also edited. 5/9/2011 - Updated streets in Bismarck, Mandan, Jamestown, Dickinson, West Fargo ( not quite finished yet), and Valley City. Also, corrected the north - south roads in Township 144N Ranges 49 - 53 E, (in Traill County) 10/5/10 - The original Roads_County data was maintained in two separate ArcInfo coverages and then combined each year and exported to the NDHUB infrastructure. These two coverages have now been combined into one SDE feature class and is being edited within the SDE environment. The following changes have been made to feature class. Deleted all the A1 and A2 Fields so a person would have to hunt back and forth to find a road name. Road names consist of the following fields: RTE_ID, STR_TYP, SUF_DIR, & LAN_DIR. The CMC route numbers were moved from the A1_ prefixed fields to the CMC field to better track the CMC route. Created a County Highway field so we can enter the county road number. It consists of the counties name and number. This is still a work in progress. Created FS_RD_Number and FS_RD_Name fields to better track Forest Service roads. Created Bia-RD_Number and BIA_RD_Name fields to better track Bureau of Indian Affairs roads. The following field changes are used for NDDOT specific processes: Created a service level field which is something that may be used in the future. Currently it contains how Walsh County prioritizes their roads. Created a Through and Connecting Route field so we can so select routes through the towns and cities. This was created exclusively for the county base maps. Created an Inset Associated field. This was created so the information in the rd_misc would come into the county routes. In the future, it is planned to be deleted. 6/18/09 - Updated county routes from aerial observation and photo interpretation using 2003, 2005, 2006 NAIP photos and 2008 photography from Designs camera. Counties updated were Golden Valley, Billings, McKenzie, Dunn, Mercer, Oliver, McLean, Sheridan and Burleigh. City streets were rectified in these counties using the 2003 NAIP photos. Observations were performed by Steven Nelson. 4/17/08 - Updated road surface types in NE. Rolette, Pierce, Benson, Towner, Ramsey, Cavalier, Pembina, Walsh, Grand Forks and Nelson from the 2006 aerial observations by Dewaine Olson 2/13/07 - Updated via 2004 NAIP photos: Barnes, Cass, Eddy, Foster, Griggs, Kidder, Steele, Stutsman, Traill, Wells. Combined Misc Roads and County Roads. Blank fields mean unknown attribute. Use P_STREET_NAME for dynamic labeling. We are also in the process of removing all proposed roads. 12/28/05 - Counties updated: Emmons, Logan, Mcintosh, Lamoure, Dickey, Ransom, Sargent, Richland, Divide, Williams, Burke, Mountrail, Ward, Renville, Bottineau, and Mchenry This data came from the NDDOT's Mapping Section. The original data was digitized from hand scribed maps and registered

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu