33 datasets found
  1. a

    NDGISHUB County Roads

    • gishubdata-ndgov.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 9, 2011
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    State of North Dakota (2011). NDGISHUB County Roads [Dataset]. https://gishubdata-ndgov.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/NDGOV::ndgishub-county-roads/explore
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 9, 2011
    Dataset authored and provided by
    State of North Dakota
    Area covered
    Description

    11/22/2024- County-wide road updates were completed in Golden Valley and Billings Counties. Intersecting routes throughout the state were cartographically realigned in preparation of MIRE intersections 6/27/2024 - The data was prepared for HPMS submittal which included updated 2023 AADT values and to keep certain segments consistent with HPMS segments, mainly sample sections and the NHS, values of "BOTH", "NHS" and "SAMPLE" were added to the field HPMS_ROUTE_ID to distinguish these segments from other segments. 3/19/2024 - Miscellaneous updates were done in Dunn County. County wide updates to Grand Forks and Golden Valley counties along with route realignments at intersections throughout the state.12/04/2023 - County wide updates to Walsh, Dunn and Grand Forks Counties and various updates to county/local roads throughout the state including street names in Westhope8/23/2023 - Function Class changes were updated in McLean and Mountrail Counties. Function Class updates also occurred in the cities of Fargo, Valley City, West Fargo and Williston. County-wide updates completed for: Towner, Cavalier, Pembina, Pierce, Benson, Ramsey. 2022 AADTs updated. A road was also removed in Bottineau County at the request off a landowner.5/19/22 - Dunn County contacted the NDDOT with data updates ,Rolette County was updated, and the 2021 AADT's were updated. 2/14/22 - Contacted by the Dunn County Road Dept., updates were made on newly paved road segments. 1/20/2022 - Since the August 2021 update, Morton, Stark, Hettinger, Bowman, Adams, Slope, Grant and Sioux Counties have been updated using 2020 imagery. Surface type has been checked and updated on all functionally classified roads statewide. Function Class changes have been made in the Bismarck/Mandan Metro, Grand Forks County and Burleigh County.6/15/21 - Since the 2019 update, trails and seldom used trails were updated statewide using 2018,and 2019 imagery. Steele, Traill and Griggs Counties have also been updated using 2020 imagery. Surface type has been checked and updated on all functionally classified roads statewide New roads added includes roads in the Fargo, West Fargo, Grand Forks, Jamestown, Bismarck, Mandan, Minot, Dickinson, Watford City and Williston. Ownership on Federal jurisdiction roads were also updated based on an dataset received for FHWA in conjunction with the HPMS submittal. HPMS (Highway Performance Monitoring System) fields were also added in an effort to integrate the roads county data into HPMS and MIRE (Model Inventory Roadway Elements). 9/14/20 - Added the following fields - AADT, AADT_YR, HPMS_MAINTENANCE_OPERATIONS, HPMS_THROUGH_LANES, FUNCTIONAL_CLASS (replaces FUNCTION_CLASS)8/13/19 - The following counties were updated by using a variety of aerial photography: Eddy, Foster and Barnes. Seldom used trails have been added to Barnes, Benson, Billings, Bottineau, and Bowman Counties. Mercer County had (2) 61STAvenues, this has been corrected.12/26/18 - The following counties have had their roads updated by a variety of aerial photography, McHenry, Wells, Kidder, Cass (with aid of Cass county website) and McKenzie (with aid of McKenzie County GIS Coordinator)8/14/18 - Counties updated using 2017 NAIP Imagery are Ward, Mountrail, Burke and Renville counties. Seldom used trails are also being digitized into the dataset. They are being added as counties are being checked, so it will take some time for all seldom used trails to be added statewide. Also since the last update, all local roads that are in the corporate boundaries have been broken at the boundaries so it is easier to query to determine which roads go with each community.5/21/18 - removed CITY_INT_ID column - no longer used because of CITY_FIPS and HPMS_URBAN_CODE attributes. Removed SERVICE_LEVEL field, never used/maintained.4/19/18 - added HPMS_OWNERSHIP and HPMS_FACILITY fields for HPMS submittal1/24/18 - added CITY_FIPS and HPMS_URBAN_CODE attributes/domains. These columns will replace CITY_INT_ID and SOURCE_ID columns (eventually).11/15/17 - Williams, Divide and Bottineau counties have been updated. Great effort has been taken to update attributes and QC null fields. Functional Classified roads in Bismarck and Mandan have been updated as have local roads in Bismarck, Mandan, Williston, Fargo – West Fargo and Minot. 1/25/17 - started to maintain roads in Esri's Road and Highways. The shapes now contain measures in miles along with the associated linear referencing/roads and highways fields. Removed INSET_ASSOC field and added COUNTY_FIPS field.Updates include the counties of Emmons, Logan, McIntosh, Lamoure, Dickey, Ransom, Sargent and Richland. These counties were updated using a combination of the available NAIP aerials, the DES aerials, and by car within the insets. In addition to these updates, the whole county dataset was edited using Data Reviewer checks. The checks ran included unnecessary nodes, non-linear segments, invalid geometry, Duplicate vertices with a tolerance of .5 meters, polyline closes of self, checked for cutbacks using a 15 degree minimum angle, checked for polyline length check using a distance less than 10 meters, checked for multipart lines, inspected dangles with a tolerance of 10 meters, and checked for orphans. All checks were inspected and fixed where appropriate.7/16/14 - updates include: Traill, Barnes, Stutsman, Kidder, Bowman, Slope, Stark, Hettinger, Adams, Grant, Sioux and Morton. These datasets were updated using a combination of the available NAIP aerials, the DES aerials, and by car within the insets.10/22/12 - city streets were updated in Bismarck, Dickinson, Minot and Williston. GIS data from the city of Bismarck was used to update Bismarck, GIS data and 2012 aerial photography was used to update the city of Williston, Minot’s city map and the 2010 aerial photography from Ward County was used to update Minot, and 2011 aerial photography and Dickinson’s "working" city map was used to update Dickinson. The counties updated were Williams, Burke, Bottineau, Mountrail, Ward, Wells, Eddy, Foster, Griggs, Steele, and Cass. At the time of this updated, approximately 50% of Stutsman and 50% of Traill Counties are updated. Williams, Bottineau, Ward, and Mountrail roads were inspected from the air and the 2009 NAIP photos were also used to assist the updates. The roads in Williams County were also recoded to match Williams County naming conventions. Williams County CADD map which is on the Williams county web site was used in updating the road names. In Ward County, the 2010 image from Ward County was used to assist in updating Ward County. The 2010 NAIP photos were used to update Wells, Eddy, Foster, Griggs and Steele Counties. Cass was updated with the assistance of the Cass County GIS layer and the 2011 Cass county imagery. 10/3/2011 - County roads were edited in the cities of Fargo, West Fargo, Horace, Minot, Bismarck, Devils Lake, Grafton, Williston, Valley City, and Dickinson. Also, a part of Ward and Mchenry Counties was edited and the county of Renville has been updated. The business routes through Bismarck and Jamestown were also edited. 5/9/2011 - Updated streets in Bismarck, Mandan, Jamestown, Dickinson, West Fargo ( not quite finished yet), and Valley City. Also, corrected the north - south roads in Township 144N Ranges 49 - 53 E, (in Traill County) 10/5/10 - The original Roads_County data was maintained in two separate ArcInfo coverages and then combined each year and exported to the NDHUB infrastructure. These two coverages have now been combined into one SDE feature class and is being edited within the SDE environment. The following changes have been made to feature class. Deleted all the A1 and A2 Fields so a person would have to hunt back and forth to find a road name. Road names consist of the following fields: RTE_ID, STR_TYP, SUF_DIR, & LAN_DIR. The CMC route numbers were moved from the A1_ prefixed fields to the CMC field to better track the CMC route. Created a County Highway field so we can enter the county road number. It consists of the counties name and number. This is still a work in progress. Created FS_RD_Number and FS_RD_Name fields to better track Forest Service roads. Created Bia-RD_Number and BIA_RD_Name fields to better track Bureau of Indian Affairs roads. The following field changes are used for NDDOT specific processes: Created a service level field which is something that may be used in the future. Currently it contains how Walsh County prioritizes their roads. Created a Through and Connecting Route field so we can so select routes through the towns and cities. This was created exclusively for the county base maps. Created an Inset Associated field. This was created so the information in the rd_misc would come into the county routes. In the future, it is planned to be deleted. 6/18/09 - Updated county routes from aerial observation and photo interpretation using 2003, 2005, 2006 NAIP photos and 2008 photography from Designs camera. Counties updated were Golden Valley, Billings, McKenzie, Dunn, Mercer, Oliver, McLean, Sheridan and Burleigh. City streets were rectified in these counties using the 2003 NAIP photos. Observations were performed by Steven Nelson. 4/17/08 - Updated road surface types in NE. Rolette, Pierce, Benson, Towner, Ramsey, Cavalier, Pembina, Walsh, Grand Forks and Nelson from the 2006 aerial observations by Dewaine Olson 2/13/07 - Updated via 2004 NAIP photos: Barnes, Cass, Eddy, Foster, Griggs, Kidder, Steele, Stutsman, Traill, Wells. Combined Misc Roads and County Roads. Blank fields mean unknown attribute. Use P_STREET_NAME for dynamic labeling. We are also in the process of removing all proposed roads. 12/28/05 - Counties updated: Emmons, Logan, Mcintosh, Lamoure, Dickey, Ransom, Sargent, Richland, Divide, Williams, Burke, Mountrail, Ward, Renville, Bottineau, and Mchenry This data came from the NDDOT's Mapping Section. The original data was digitized from hand scribed maps and registered

  2. i

    Wealth Statistics for Ward County, North Dakota

    • interactive-map-ai.com
    Updated Nov 27, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Map AI (2025). Wealth Statistics for Ward County, North Dakota [Dataset]. https://interactive-map-ai.com/explore/us/ND/ward-county/wealth
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 27, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Map AI
    Time period covered
    2020 - Present
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    Gini Index, Unemployment Rate, Median Household Income
    Description

    Ward County, ND has a B wealth grade. Median household income: $80,273. Unemployment rate: 3.1%. Income grows 3.5% yearly.

  3. Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania County...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    Updated Oct 16, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Park Service (2025). Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania County Battlefields Memorial National Military Park and Vicinity, Virginia (NPS, GRD, GRI, FRSP, FRSP digital map) adapted from a U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Investigations Series Map by Mixon, Pavlides, Powars, Froelich, Weems, Schindler, Newell, Edwards and Ward (2000) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/digital-geologic-gis-map-of-fredericksburg-and-spotsylvania-county-battlefields-memorial-n
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 16, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Park Servicehttp://www.nps.gov/
    Area covered
    Spotsylvania County, Fredericksburg, Virginia
    Description

    The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania County Battlefields Memorial National Military Park and Vicinity, Virginia is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) an ESRI file geodatabase (frsp_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro 3.X map file (.mapx) file (frsp_geology.mapx) and individual Pro 3.X layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) a readme file (frsp_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (frsp_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (frsp_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the frsp_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri.htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (frsp_geology_metadata.txt or frsp_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:100,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 50.8 meters or 166.7 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS Pro, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

  4. a

    NDGISHUB City Boundaries

    • gishubdata-ndgov.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Oct 9, 2012
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    State of North Dakota (2012). NDGISHUB City Boundaries [Dataset]. https://gishubdata-ndgov.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/NDGOV::ndgishub-city-boundaries/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 9, 2012
    Dataset authored and provided by
    State of North Dakota
    Area covered
    Description

    8/04/2025 - Updates to Mandan and Thompson. 4/25/2025 - Updates to Ellendale, Fargo, Kindred, Lincoln, Mandan, Rugby and Tappen.12/06/2024 - Update to Lincoln and Bismarck Corporate Boundaries based on requests from Lincoln.6/27/2024 - Update to the Valley City and Dickinson Corporate Boundary based on requests from their GIS personal.4/8/2024 - Update to the Valley City Corporate Boundary12/04/2023 - Update to Fargo City Boundary7/23/2023 - Removed Church’s Ferry due to proclamation and notice of dissolution.7/01/2023 - Changes to Binford - Ordinance 51; Lidgerwood - Ordinance 2022-1; Killdeer Golf Course annexation; Bismarck based on current City of Bismarck GIS boundary9/26/2022 - Changes to Steele boundary per Kidder County 911 coordinator.9/23/2022 - Updates to Grand Forks, Mandan and Fargo7/01/2022 - Updates to Killdeer, Mandan and Williston per State Tax Dept changes. 2/14/2022- Updates to Minot -13th ST SE/31st AVE SE, Updates to Elgin, Horace and St. John.11/16/2021 -Updates to Bismarck, Fargo and Killdeer based on city ordinances.7/2/21 – Changes were made to the City of Bismarck, Fargo and Hillsboro to include local taxing jurisdiction boundary changes from the State Tax Commissioner.5/4/21 - Updates were made to the City of Wahpeton due to an annexation.4/29/21 - Updated Minot and Makoti3/5/21 - Updated an annexation to Arnegard that was submitted to the DOT by Mackenzie's County Public Works GIS Coordinator.1/21/21 - Update to Sentinel Butte per Golden Valley 911 Coordinator7/17/20 - Updates to Bismarck, Linton and Stanley6/1/20 - Updates to Killdeer, New Town and Surrey1/17/2020 - Boundary changes have been updated for Bismarck, Bowman Fargo, Garrison, Linton, and New Salem.3/5/19 - The corporate boundary of Surrey has been updated.12/26/18 - The following corporate boundaries have been updated: Bismarck, Lincoln, Grand Forks, Horace, Casselton, Fargo, Oxbow, Tioga and Stanley.6/19/18 - City of Maza is not incorporated based on the 2011-2013 North Dakota Blue book. Removed Maza.5/14/18 - Updated Dickinson, Watford City, Berthold, Minnewauken, and Cavalier.1/31/18 - Updated Dickinson, Mandan, Minot, Tioga, Devils Lake, Belfield, Washburn, Mohall, Minnewauken, Lincoln, Bismarck and Casselton. 10/24/17 - Updated Watford City and Makoti10/16/17 - The following cities have been updated: Jamestown, Milnor, Bismarck, Carrington, Casselton, Mandan, Minot, Stanley, Larimore, Crosby, and Watford City.1/10/17 - The following cities have been updated: Lehr, Grand Forks, Langdon, Drayton, Flasher, Glen Ullin, Watford City, Zap, Lignite, Hankinson, Beach, Underwood, South Heart, Devils Lake, all cities in Ward County, Cavalier, Bismarck, Lincoln, Fargo, West Fargo, Ayr, Briarwood, Casselton, Davenport, Enderlin, Grandin, Horace, and North River.9/19/16 - Updated the following cities: Watford City, Steele, Richardton, Berthold, Carpio, Burlington, Des Lacs, Donnybrook, Douglas, Kenmare, Makoti, Ryder, Sawyer, and Surrey.6/23/16 - Updated cities are as follows: All cities in Pembina, Morton, Richland, and Williams Counties. The cities of Bismarck, West Fargo, Harwood, Oxbow, Beach, Minot, Stanley, Jamestown, Fargo, Dickinson and New Town.9/28/15 - The following cites have had annexation: Stanley, Bottineau, Minot, Casselton, Belfield and Watford City.7/24/15 - Updated Grafton, Stanley, Bismarck, Williston, Horace, Fargo, Grand Forks, Watford City, Turtle Lake, Leeds, Maxbass and Medora1/16/15 - Updated Grafton, Stanley and Bismarck.11/3/2014 - Updated Bismarck, Mandan, Minot, Stanley, and Watford City7/16/14 - Corporate limits updated include: Mandan, Towner, Fargo, West Fargo, Grand Forks, Bismarck, Bowman, Watford City, Stanley, Tioga, Kenmare, Casselton, Minot, Carrington, Kindred, and Killdeer. The corporate limit updates consisted of receiving from the cities, shape files, CADD files, scanned images of annexations or by converting pdf files into images, rectifying them within ArcGIS, then heads-up digitizing. 7/29/13 - updated Stanley, Williston, Minot, and Bismarck.4/30/13 - updated Williston, Hazen, Minot, Dickinson, Valley City, Velva, Rugby, Bismarck, and Lincoln1/28/13 - updated Valley City, Grand Forks, Bismarck, Williston, Jamestown, Harvey, Mohall, Park River, Ray, Rugby, Stanley, Tioga, Mayville and Glenfield10/9/12 - updated Williston and Dickinson6/20/12 - updated Williston via shapefile from city.3/20/12 - updated Bismarck and Minot10/3/2011 - Edited corporate limits for Bottineau, Grand Forks, Bismarck, Grafton, Fargo, West Fargo, Horace, Dickinson, Williston, Valley City and Devils Lake.2/4/11 - Removed urban areas so only corporate boundaries remain. Removed boolean field named URBAN_AREA. Updated corporate limist in Dickinson and cities with Cass county. 6/24/10 - Stanley, Lincoln, Oakes, Hankinson, Enderlin, Ellendale, Linton, Carrington, Minot, and Kulm corportate limits were changed 6/18/09 - Stanley, Wahpeton, Center, Watford City, Williston, Grand Forks, Killdeer, Beulah, Beach, Hazen, Garrison, Washburn, Bismarck and Lincoln corporate limits were changed 3/24/08 - Added Milton, Drayton, and Cavalier Boudaries updated: Park River 1/16/08 - Boundaries updated: Devils Lake, Glen Ullin, Langdon, Minnewaukan, Northwood, Thompson 2/13/07 - Boundaries updated: Amenia, Arthur, Bismarck, Bottineau, Buffalo, Casstleton, Davenport, Dickinson, Enderlin, Gardner, Grand Forks, Grandin, Harvey, Harvey, Hillsboro, Horace, Hunter, Jamestown, Kindred, Mapleton, Mayville, New Rockford, Oxbox, Page, Prairie Rose, Relies Acres, Tappen, Towner City 1/10/06 - Boundaries updated: Wishek, Fargo, Lincoln, Bottineau, Williston, Grand Forks, Granville, Velva, Stanley, urban areas in Fargo, West Fargo, Bismarck and Mandan. Deleted Larson This data came from the NDDOT's Mapping Section. The original data was digitized from hand scribed maps and registered to the 1:24000 USGS PLSS data. It was converted from a projection (NAD 1983 UTM Zone 14N) to a Geographic coordinate system.

  5. a

    City Council Outlines

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • kitsap-od-kitcowa.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Oct 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kitsap County GIS (2025). City Council Outlines [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/KitCoWA::city-council-outlines
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 9, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Kitsap County GIS
    Area covered
    Description

    City council/ward districts. Boundaries were obtained from the jurisdiction and used to generate the present data set to be spatially accurate and adjusted to the County's parcel base map. Boundaries will be updated as annexations occur, and adjusted as needed to the parcel map.

  6. e

    Ward to LAD to County to County Electoral Division (May 2019) Lookup for EN

    • data.europa.eu
    • hub.arcgis.com
    • +2more
    csv +9
    Updated May 15, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office for National Statistics (2019). Ward to LAD to County to County Electoral Division (May 2019) Lookup for EN [Dataset]. https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/ward-to-lad-to-county-to-county-electoral-division-may-2019-lookup-for-en/embed?locale=en
    Explore at:
    csv, html, esri file geodatabase, kml, zip, geojson, geopackage, unknown, plain text, excel xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 15, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Office for National Statistics
    Description

    A lookup of wards to local authority districts to county to county electoral divisions in England as at 2nd May 2019. (File Size - 2 MB).

    Field Names – WD19CD, WD19NM, LAD19CD, LAD19NM, CTY19CD, CTY19NM, CED19CD, CED19NM, FID
    Field Types – Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text
    Field Lengths – 9, 53, 9, 28, 9, 16, 9, 55

    FID = The FID, or Feature ID is created by the publication process when the names and codes / lookup products are published to the Open Geography portal.


  7. s

    Syracuse Parcel Map (2025 Q3)

    • data.syr.gov
    Updated Sep 18, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    admin_syr (2025). Syracuse Parcel Map (2025 Q3) [Dataset]. https://data.syr.gov/items/1d2af97d244f4000ae28cf990e2fd103
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 18, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    admin_syr
    Area covered
    Description

    Data Dictionary:Attribute LabelDefinitionSourceTAX_IDCity Tax ID number (26 digit number used for parcel mapping)Onondaga County Finance Department, Division of Real Property Tax Services, Tax Mapping ProgramPRINTKEYProperty Tax Map Number (Section, Block, Lot)Onondaga County Finance Department, Division of Real Property Tax Services, Tax Mapping ProgramADDRESSNUMParcel street numberOnondaga County Finance Department, Division of Real Property Tax Services, Tax Mapping ProgramADDRESSNAMParcel street nameOnondaga County Finance Department, Division of Real Property Tax Services, Tax Mapping ProgramLATITUDECentral point y-coordinate in decimal degreesNA - Calculated fieldLONGITUDECentral point x-coordinate in decimal degreesNA - Calculated fieldTAX_IDCity Tax ID number (26 digit number used for parcel mapping)City of Syracuse - AssessmentSBLProperty Tax Map Number (Section, Block, Lot)City of Syracuse - AssessmentPNUMBRProperty Number (10 digit number)City of Syracuse - AssessmentStNumParcel street numberCity of Syracuse - AssessmentStNameParcel street nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentFullAddressStreet number and street nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentZipParcel zip codeCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_1Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_2Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_3Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - AssessmentSHAPE_IND City of Syracuse - AssessmentLUC_parcelNew York State property type classification code assigned by assessor during each roll categorizing the property by use. For more details: https://www.tax.ny.gov/research/property/assess/manuals/prclas.htmCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLU_parcelNew York State property type classification nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLUCat_OldLegacy land use category that corresponds to the overarching NYS category, i.e. all 400s = commercial, all 300s = vacant land, etc.NAland_avLand assessed valueCity of Syracuse - Assessmenttotal_avFull assessed valueCity of Syracuse - AssessmentOwnerProperty owner name (First, Initial, Last, Suffix)City of Syracuse - AssessmentOwnerFullAddressProperty owner assessed address (street number, street name, street direction [or PO Box], unit name, unit number, city, state or country, zip code)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd1_OwnPOBoxProperty owner mailing address (PO Box)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd2_OwnStAddProperty owner mailing address (street number, street name, street direction)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd3_OwnUnitInfoProperty owner mailing address unit info (unit name, unit number)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd4_OwnCityStateZipProperty owner mailing address (city, state or country, zip code)City of Syracuse - AssessmentFRONTFront footage for square or rectangular shaped lots and the effective front feet on irregularly shaped lots in feetCity of Syracuse - AssessmentDEPTHActual depth of rectangular shaped lots in feet (irregular lots are usually measured in acres or square feet)City of Syracuse - AssessmentACRESNumber of acres (where values were 0, acreage calculated as FRONT*DEPTH)/43560)City of Syracuse - Assessmentyr_builtYear built. Where year built was "0" or null, effective year built is given. (Effective age is determined by comparing the physical condition of one building with that of other like-use, newer buildings. Effective age may or may not represent the actual year built; if there have been constant upgrades or excellent maintenance this may be more recent than the original year built.)City of Syracuse - Assessmentn_ResUnitsNumber of residential unitsNA - Calculated fieldIPSVacantIs it a vacant structure? ("Commercial" or "Residential" = Yes; null = No)City of Syracuse - Division of Code EnforcementIPS_ConditionProperty Condition Score assigned to vacant properties by housing inspectors during routine vacant inspections (1 = Worst; 5 = Best)City of Syracuse - Division of Code EnforcementNREligibleNational Register of Historic Places Eligible ("NR Eligible (SHPO)," or "NR Listed")City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentLPSSLocally Protected Site Status ("Eligible/Architecturally Significant" or "Local Protected Site or Local District")City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentWTR_ACTIVEWater activity code ("I" = Inactive; "A" = Active)City of Syracuse - WaterRNIIs property located in Resurgent Neighborhood Initiative (RNI) Area? (1 = Yes; 0 = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentDPW_QuadGeographic quadrant property is located in. Quadrants are divided Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and Southeast based on property location in relation to I-81 and I-690. DPW uses the quad designation for some types of staff assignments.City of Syracuse - Department of Public WorksDPW_SaniDPW sanitation trash and recycling pick-up day (trash service weekly, recycling biweekly)City of Syracuse - Department of Public WorksDPW_RecycleDPW recycling biweekly pick-up group (either Week A or Week B), collection occurs every other weekCity of Syracuse - Department of Public WorksTNT_NAMETNT Sector property is located inCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNHOODCity NeighborhoodSyracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)NRSAIs property located in Neighborhood Revitilization Strategy Area (NRSA)? (1 = Yes; 0 = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentDOCE_Insp1Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases for housing inspectorsCity of Syracuse - Division of Code EnforcementDOCE_Insp2Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases for building inspectorsCity of Syracuse - Division of Code EnforcementDOCE_PermitGeographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases for permit inspectorsCity of Syracuse - Division of Code EnforcementDOCE_CommGeographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases for commercial and electrical inspectorsCity of Syracuse - Division of Code EnforcementFIRE_DISTFire engine districtsCity of Syracuse - Fire DepartmentZONE_DIST_PREVFormer zoning district codeSyracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)REZONEReZone designation (adopted June 2023, last updated 2024-12-17)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentCC_DISTCurrent Common Council District property is located inOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCTID_2020Census Tract ID (2020)U.S. Census BureauCTLAB_2020Census Tract Label (2020)U.S. Census BureauCT_2020Census Tract (2020)U.S. Census BureauSpecNhoodIs property located in a special Neighborhood historic preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No)Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)InPDIs property located in preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No)Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)PDNAMEPreservation District nameSyracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)ELECT_DISTElection district numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCITY_WARDCity ward numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCOUNTY_LEGOnondaga County Legislative District number (as of Dec 2024)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsNYS_ASSEMBNew York State Assembly District number (as of Dec 2024)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsNYS_SENATENew York State Senate District number (as of Dec 2024)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsUS_CONGRUnited States Congressional District numberOnondaga County Board of Elections Dataset Contact Information Organization: Dept. of Neighborhood & Business Development (NBD)Position:Data Program ManagerCity:Syracuse, NYE-Mail Address:opendata@syrgov.net

  8. C

    Allegheny County Voting District Boundaries Ward District Labels (archive)

    • data.wprdc.org
    • datasets.ai
    • +2more
    csv, geojson, html +2
    Updated Nov 21, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Allegheny County (2025). Allegheny County Voting District Boundaries Ward District Labels (archive) [Dataset]. https://data.wprdc.org/dataset/allegheny-county-voting-district-boundaries-ward-district-labels
    Explore at:
    kml(7457060), geojson(8219454), html, zip(1790870), csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 21, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Allegheny County
    Area covered
    Allegheny County
    Description

    This dataset demarcates municipal voting districts in Allegheny County. Allegheny County Elections Districts were updated in 2019 to match municipal boundaries.

    Coordinate System: Pennsylvania State Plane South Zone 3702; U.S. Survey Foot Data Dictionary: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HR24LyBNpLwvJZoaGp-tBGRw0HRoXNIef6nU4UQQMMo/edit?usp=sharing

    CHANGELOG

    2023-03-29: This dataset was harvested on a weekly basis from Allegheny County’s GIS data portal until March of 2023, when it was removed from the Allegheny County’s GIS portal.

  9. s

    Syracuse Parcel Map (2023 Q4)

    • data.syr.gov
    Updated Feb 6, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    admin_syr (2024). Syracuse Parcel Map (2023 Q4) [Dataset]. https://data.syr.gov/datasets/6aad653972b54d6baaccdbedd767a6df
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 6, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    admin_syr
    Area covered
    Description

    Data Dictionary: AttributeLabelDefinitionSourceTAX_IDUnique 26 character property taxOnondaga County PlanningPRINTKEYAbbreviated tax identification number (section-block-lot)Onondaga County PlanningEASTGRIDEast grid coordinate of centroid in feetOnondaga County PlanningNORTHGRIDNorth grid coordinate of centroid in feetOnondaga County PlanningTAX_ID_1City Tax ID number (26 digit number used for parcel mapping)City of Syracuse - AssessmentSBLProperty Tax Map Number (Section, Block, Lot)City of Syracuse - AssessmentPNUMBRProperty Number (10 digit number)City of Syracuse - AssessmentStNumParcel street numberCity of Syracuse - AssessmentStNameParcel street nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentFullAddressStreet number and street nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentZipParcel zip codeCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_1Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_2Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_3Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - AssessmentSHAPE_INDCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLUC_parcelNew York State property type classification code assigned by assessor during each roll. For more details: https://www.tax.ny.gov/research/property/assess/manuals/prclas.htmCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLU_parcelNew York State property type classification nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLUCat_OldLegacy land use category that corresponds to the overarching NYS category, i.e. all 400s = commercial, all 300s = vacant land, etc. City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Developmentland_avLand valueCity of Syracuse - Assessmenttotal_avFull valueCity of Syracuse - AssessmentOwnerProperty owner name (First, Initial, Last, Suffix)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd1_OwnPOProperty owner mailing address (PO Box)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd2_OwnStProperty owner mailing address (street number, street name, street direction)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd3_OwnUnProperty owner mailing address unit info (unit name, unit number)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd4_OwnCiProperty owner mailing address (city, state or country, zip code)City of Syracuse - AssessmentFRONTFront footage for square or rectangular shaped lots and the effective front feet on irregularly shaped lots in feetCity of Syracuse - AssessmentDEPTH_1Actual depth of rectangular shaped lots in feet (irregular lots are usually measured in acres or square feet)City of Syracuse - AssessmentACRES_1Number of acres (where values were 0, acreage calculated as FRONT*DEPTH)/43560)City of Syracuse - Assessmentyr_builtYear builtCity of Syracuse - AssessmentIPSVacantIs it a vacant structure? ("Commercial" or "Residential" = Yes; null = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentIPS_ConditProperty Condition Score assigned to vacant properties by housing inspectors during routine vacant inspections (1 = Worst; 5 = Best)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNREligibleNational Register of Historic Places Eligible ("NR Eligible (SHPO)," or "NR Listed")City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentLPSSLocally Protected Site Status ("Eligible/Architecturally Significant" or "Local Protected Site or Local District")City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentWTR_ACTIVEWater activity code ("I" = Inactive; "A" = Active)City of Syracuse - WaterRNIIs property located in Resurgent Neighborhood Initiative (RNI) Area? (1 = Yes; 0 = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentDPW_QuadGeographic quadrant property is located in. Quadrants are divided Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and Southeast based on property location in relation to I-81 and I-690. DPW uses the quad designation for some types of staff assignments.City of Syracuse - Department of Public WorksTNT_NAMETNT Sector property is located inCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNHOODCity NeighborhoodCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNRSAIs property located in Neighborhood Revitilization Strategy Area (NRSA)? (1 = Yes; 0 = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentDOCE_AreaGeographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement casesCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentZONE_DIST_Former zoning district codeCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentREZONEReZone designation (adopted June 2023)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNew_CC_DISTCurrent Common Council District property is located inCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentCTID_2020Census Tract ID (2020)U.S. Census BureauCTLAB_2020Census Tract Label (2020)U.S. Census BureauCT_2020Census Tract (2020)U.S. Census BureauSpecNhoodIs property located in a special Neighborhood historic preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentInPDIs property located in preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentPDNAMEPreservation District nameCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentELECT_DISTElection district numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCITY_WARDCity ward numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCOUNTY_LEGOnondaga County Legislative District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsNYS_ASSEMBNew York State Assembly District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsNYS_SENATENew York State Senate District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsUS_CONGRUnited States Congressional District numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsDataset Contact InformationOrganization: Neighborhood & Business DevelopmentPosition:Data Program ManagerCity:Syracuse, NYE-Mail Address:opendata@syrgov.net

  10. a

    East Bay Regional Park District Wards

    • data.acgov.org
    • opendata-acgov.hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 29, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    AlamedaCounty.CA.US (2021). East Bay Regional Park District Wards [Dataset]. https://data.acgov.org/datasets/c028bf7aab7f4885a4f794b7abc5be06
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 29, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    AlamedaCounty.CA.US
    Area covered
    Description

    East Bay Regional Park District with ward boundaries, within the extent of Alameda County; boundaries have been updated to show 2011-2012 redistricting changes. Boundaries represent voting districts (i.e., district designation for each address) and therefore may align with parcel boundaries in cases where parcels (and sometimes residences) are divided by the true city/district boundary.

  11. a

    Wards

    • gis2017-04-13t155717567z-sullconygiso.opendata.arcgis.com
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Mar 28, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sullivan County GIS Program (2024). Wards [Dataset]. https://gis2017-04-13t155717567z-sullconygiso.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/wards
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 28, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Sullivan County GIS Program
    License

    Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 (CC BY-SA 2.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    DATA LAYER DETAILS: Ward Boundaries for Sullivan County, NY. This data layer includes all current Sullivan County electoral wards effective as of the 2023 voting period.

  12. a

    MATURE SUPPORT - Ward Boundaries for New Jersey

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • share-open-data-njtpa.hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Sep 24, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    New Jersey Office of GIS (2020). MATURE SUPPORT - Ward Boundaries for New Jersey [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/b6df174950f54128bea05f8c01bd061f
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 24, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    New Jersey Office of GIS
    Area covered
    Description

    This item is in mature support and is no longer updated. Available for historical reference only. This dataset contains polygons representing voting Ward boundaries within all municipalities in the state of New Jersey. The statewide dataset was created from existing vector data maintained by Remington & Vernick Engineers, under contract with the NJ Department of State, Division of Elections and KNOWiNK, for eleven counties (in part or in whole) and from county and municipal Election District and Ward maps, tax assessment parcel GIS data, and other data sources, for the balance of the state.

  13. a

    East Bay Municipal Utility District Wards

    • data.acgov.org
    Updated Mar 29, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    AlamedaCounty.CA.US (2021). East Bay Municipal Utility District Wards [Dataset]. https://data.acgov.org/datasets/97e8ce525c0d4c6abeb7374a7dba008b
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 29, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    AlamedaCounty.CA.US
    Area covered
    Description

    East Bay Municipal Utility District with ward boundaries, within the extent of Alameda County; boundaries have been updated to show 2011-2012 redistricting changes. Boundaries represent voting districts (i.e., district designation for each address) and therefore may align with parcel boundaries in cases where parcels (and sometimes residences) are divided by the true city/district boundary.

  14. a

    Syracuse Parcel Map (2024 Q1)

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • data-syr.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Apr 10, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    admin_syr (2024). Syracuse Parcel Map (2024 Q1) [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/1f2ff0241886433ab5b0bfe706d0bea9_0/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 10, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    admin_syr
    License

    https://data.syr.gov/pages/termsofusehttps://data.syr.gov/pages/termsofuse

    Area covered
    Description

    We are also including tabular version that’s slightly more comprehensive (would include anything that didn’t join to the parcel basefile due to lot alterations or resubdivisions since 2023 and/or due to parcels comprised of condos). There are approximately 200 records that don't join to the spatial parcel file and some additional that are null in the spatial parcel file, altogether around 560 total. This Excel file can be downloaded HERE, and does not contain the latitude and longitude information.Data Dictionary:Attribute LabelDefinitionSourceTAX_IDUnique 26 character property tax identification numberOnondaga County PlanningPRINTKEYAbbreviated tax identification number (section-block-lot)Onondaga County PlanningADDRESSNUMProperty’s physical street addressOnondaga County PlanningADDRESSNAMProperty’s physical street nameOnondaga County PlanningTAX_ID_1City Tax ID number (26 digit number used for parcel mapping)City of Syracuse - AssessmentSBLProperty Tax Map Number (Section, Block, Lot)City of Syracuse - AssessmentPNUMBRProperty Number (10 digit number)City of Syracuse - AssessmentStNumParcel street numberCity of Syracuse - AssessmentStNameParcel street nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentFullAddressStreet number and street nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentZipParcel zip codeCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_1Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_2Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_3Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - AssessmentSHAPE_IND City of Syracuse - AssessmentLUC_parcelNew York State property type classification code assigned by assessor during each roll categorizing the property by use. For more details: https://www.tax.ny.gov/research/property/assess/manuals/prclas.htmCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLU_parcelNew York State property type classification nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLUCat_OldLegacy land use category that corresponds to the overarching NYS category, i.e. all 400s = commercial, all 300s = vacant land, etc.NAland_avLand assessed valueCity of Syracuse - Assessmenttotal_avFull assessed valueCity of Syracuse - AssessmentOwnerProperty owner name (First, Initial, Last, Suffix)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd1_OwnPOBoxProperty owner mailing address (PO Box)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd2_OwnStAddProperty owner mailing address (street number, street name, street direction)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd3_OwnUnitInfoProperty owner mailing address unit info (unit name, unit number)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd4_OwnCityStateZipProperty owner mailing address (city, state or country, zip code)City of Syracuse - AssessmentFRONTFront footage for square or rectangular shaped lots and the effective front feet on irregularly shaped lots in feetCity of Syracuse - AssessmentDEPTHActual depth of rectangular shaped lots in feet (irregular lots are usually measured in acres or square feet)City of Syracuse - AssessmentACRESNumber of acres (where values were 0, acreage calculated as FRONT*DEPTH)/43560)City of Syracuse - Assessmentyr_builtYear built. Where year built was "0" or null, effective year built is given. (Effective age is determined by comparing the physical condition of one building with that of other like-use, newer buildings. Effective age may or may not represent the actual year built; if there have been constant upgrades or excellent maintenance this may be more recent than the original year built.)City of Syracuse - Assessmentn_ResUnitsNumber of residential unitsNA - Calculated fieldIPSVacantIs it a vacant structure? ("Commercial" or "Residential" = Yes; null = No)City of Syracuse - Division of Code EnforcementIPS_ConditionProperty Condition Score assigned to vacant properties by housing inspectors during routine vacant inspections (1 = Worst; 5 = Best)City of Syracuse - Division of Code EnforcementNREligibleNational Register of Historic Places Eligible ("NR Eligible (SHPO)," or "NR Listed")City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentLPSSLocally Protected Site Status ("Eligible/Architecturally Significant" or "Local Protected Site or Local District")City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentWTR_ACTIVEWater activity code ("I" = Inactive; "A" = Active)City of Syracuse - WaterRNIIs property located in Resurgent Neighborhood Initiative (RNI) Area? (1 = Yes; 0 = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentDPW_QuadGeographic quadrant property is located in. Quadrants are divided Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and Southeast based on property location in relation to I-81 and I-690. DPW uses the quad designation for some types of staff assignments.City of Syracuse - Department of Public WorksTNT_NAMETNT Sector property is located inCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNHOODCity NeighborhoodSyracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)NRSAIs property located in Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area (NRSA)? (1 = Yes; 0 = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentDOCE_AreaGeographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement casesCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentZONE_DIST_PREVFormer zoning district codeSyracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)REZONEReZone designation (adopted June 2023)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNew_CC_DISTCurrent Common Council District property is located inOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCTID_2020Census Tract ID (2020)U.S. Census BureauCTLAB_2020Census Tract Label (2020)U.S. Census BureauCT_2020Census Tract (2020)U.S. Census BureauSpecNhoodIs property located in a special Neighborhood historic preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No)Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)InPDIs property located in preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No)Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)PDNAMEPreservation District nameSyracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)ELECT_DISTElection district numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCITY_WARDCity ward numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCOUNTY_LEGOnondaga County Legislative District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsNYS_ASSEMBNew York State Assembly District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsNYS_SENATENew York State Senate District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsUS_CONGRUnited States Congressional District numberOnondaga County Board of Elections

  15. a

    Council Ward Map (PDF) for Marysville, Ohio

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Aug 23, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Marysville, Ohio (2021). Council Ward Map (PDF) for Marysville, Ohio [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/documents/Marysville::council-ward-map-pdf-for-marysville-ohio/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 23, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Marysville, Ohio
    License

    Public Domain Mark 1.0https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Marysville, Ohio,
    Description

    The City of Marysville is a chartered city with a council-manager form of government. Marysville’s City Council is comprised of seven members who are each elected for a term of four years. Three members are elected at large and four members are elected by ward. To find the council members in your ward, please refer to the Ward Map. The Marysville City Council is responsible for enacting local laws and ordinances, approving the budget, establishing policies / regulations, approving programs necessary to conduct city business, and protecting the public’s general health and safety.Meetings7:00 pmSecond and fourth Monday of each monthCouncil Chambers 209 S. Main St. Marysville, OH 43040Agendas & MinutesAgendas and meeting packets are available prior to the meetings. Most Recent Agenda | View All Most Recent Meeting Packet | View All

  16. a

    Maricopa County Cities and Towns

    • data-maricopa.opendata.arcgis.com
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Aug 30, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Maricopa County Enterprise GIS (2022). Maricopa County Cities and Towns [Dataset]. https://data-maricopa.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/maricopa-county-cities-and-towns
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 30, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Maricopa County Enterprise GIS
    Area covered
    Description

    The cities annex feature class is intended to track city and town annexations in Maricopa County, Arizona.

  17. a

    Electoral Villages

    • arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com
    • gis2017-04-13t155717567z-sullconygiso.opendata.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 28, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sullivan County GIS Program (2024). Electoral Villages [Dataset]. https://arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com/maps/SullCoNYGISO::electoral-villages
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 28, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Sullivan County GIS Program
    License

    Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 (CC BY-SA 2.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    DATA LAYER DETAILS: Electoral Village Boundaries for Sullivan County, NY. This data layer includes all current Sullivan County electoral village boundaries effective as of the 2023 voting period.

  18. a

    Electoral Municipalities

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • gis2017-04-13t155717567z-sullconygiso.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Mar 28, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sullivan County GIS Program (2024). Electoral Municipalities [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/SullCoNYGISO::electoral-municipalities
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 28, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Sullivan County GIS Program
    License

    Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 (CC BY-SA 2.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    DATA LAYER DETAILS: Electoral Municipal Boundaries for Sullivan County, NY. This data layer includes all current Sullivan County electoral municipal boundaries effective as of the 2023 voting period.

  19. a

    Syracuse Parcel Map (2024 Q3)

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • data.syr.gov
    Updated Aug 26, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    admin_syr (2024). Syracuse Parcel Map (2024 Q3) [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/d68de5fb5df14a86829980a195ff7a6c_0/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 26, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    admin_syr
    Area covered
    Description

    We are also including a tabular version that’s slightly more comprehensive (would include anything that didn’t join to the parcel basefile due to lot alterations or resubdivisions since 2023 and/or due to parcels comprised of condos). This Excel file can be downloaded HERE, and does not contain the latitude and longitude information.Data Dictionary: Attribute Label Definition Source

    TAX_ID Unique 26 character property tax identification number Onondaga County Planning

    PRINTKEY Abbreviated tax identification number (section-block-lot) Onondaga County Planning

    ADDRESSNUM Property’s physical street address Onondaga County Planning

    ADDRESSNAM Property’s physical street name Onondaga County Planning

    LAT Latitude Onondaga County Planning

    LONG Longitude Onondaga County Planning

    TAX_ID_1 City Tax ID number (26 digit number used for parcel mapping) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    SBL Property Tax Map Number (Section, Block, Lot) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    PNUMBR Property Number (10 digit number) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    StNum Parcel street number City of Syracuse - Assessment

    StName Parcel street name City of Syracuse - Assessment

    FullAddress Street number and street name City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Zip Parcel zip code City of Syracuse - Assessment

    desc_1 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment

    desc_2 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment

    desc_3 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment

    SHAPE_IND

    City of Syracuse - Assessment

    LUC_parcel New York State property type classification code assigned by assessor during each roll categorizing the property by use. For more details: https://www.tax.ny.gov/research/property/assess/manuals/prclas.htm City of Syracuse - Assessment

    LU_parcel New York State property type classification name City of Syracuse - Assessment

    LUCat_Old Legacy land use category that corresponds to the overarching NYS category, i.e. all 400s = commercial, all 300s = vacant land, etc. NA

    land_av Land assessed value City of Syracuse - Assessment

    total_av Full assessed value City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Owner Property owner name (First, Initial, Last, Suffix) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Add1_OwnPOBox Property owner mailing address (PO Box) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Add2_OwnStAdd Property owner mailing address (street number, street name, street direction) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Add3_OwnUnitInfo Property owner mailing address unit info (unit name, unit number) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    Add4_OwnCityStateZip Property owner mailing address (city, state or country, zip code) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    FRONT Front footage for square or rectangular shaped lots and the effective front feet on irregularly shaped lots in feet City of Syracuse - Assessment

    DEPTH Actual depth of rectangular shaped lots in feet (irregular lots are usually measured in acres or square feet) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    ACRES Number of acres (where values were 0, acreage calculated as FRONT*DEPTH)/43560) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    yr_built Year built. Where year built was "0" or null, effective year built is given. (Effective age is determined by comparing the physical condition of one building with that of other like-use, newer buildings. Effective age may or may not represent the actual year built; if there have been constant upgrades or excellent maintenance this may be more recent than the original year built.) City of Syracuse - Assessment

    n_ResUnits Number of residential units NA - Calculated field

    IPSVacant Is it a vacant structure? ("Commercial" or "Residential" = Yes; null = No) City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

    IPS_Condition Property Condition Score assigned to vacant properties by housing inspectors during routine vacant inspections (1 = Worst; 5 = Best) City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

    NREligible National Register of Historic Places Eligible ("NR Eligible (SHPO)," or "NR Listed") City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    LPSS Locally Protected Site Status ("Eligible/Architecturally Significant" or "Local Protected Site or Local District") City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    WTR_ACTIVE Water activity code ("I" = Inactive; "A" = Active) City of Syracuse - Water

    RNI Is property located in Resurgent Neighborhood Initiative (RNI) Area? (1 = Yes; 0 = No) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    DPW_Quad Geographic quadrant property is located in. Quadrants are divided Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and Southeast based on property location in relation to I-81 and I-690. DPW uses the quad designation for some types of staff assignments. City of Syracuse - Department of Public Works

    TNT_NAME TNT Sector property is located in City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    NHOOD City Neighborhood Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    NRSA Is property located in Neighborhood Revitilization Strategy Area (NRSA)? (1 = Yes; 0 = No) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    DOCE_Area Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    ZONE_DIST_PREV Former zoning district code Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    REZONE ReZone designation (adopted June 2023) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

    New_CC_DIST Current Common Council District property is located in Onondaga County Board of Elections

    CTID_2020 Census Tract ID (2020) U.S. Census Bureau

    CTLAB_2020 Census Tract Label (2020) U.S. Census Bureau

    CT_2020 Census Tract (2020) U.S. Census Bureau

    SpecNhood Is property located in a special Neighborhood historic preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No) Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    InPD Is property located in preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No) Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    PDNAME Preservation District name Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

    ELECT_DIST Election district number Onondaga County Board of Elections

    CITY_WARD City ward number Onondaga County Board of Elections

    COUNTY_LEG Onondaga County Legislative District number (as of Dec 2022) Onondaga County Board of Elections

    NYS_ASSEMB New York State Assembly District number (as of Dec 2022) Onondaga County Board of Elections

    NYS_SENATE New York State Senate District number (as of Dec 2022) Onondaga County Board of Elections

    US_CONGR United States Congressional District number Onondaga County Board of Elections

    Dataset Contact InformationOrganization: Neighborhood & Business DevelopmentPosition:Data Program ManagerCity:Syracuse, NYE-Mail Address:opendata@syrgov.netPlease note there is a data quality issue in this iteration with the preservation district (“InPD,” “PDNAME”) and special neighborhood historic district (“SpecNhood”) fields erroneously showing null results for all parcels.

  20. a

    City of Lakeshire Ward 1.pdf

    • freemaps-stlouiscovotes.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 17, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    St. Louis County Election Board (2025). City of Lakeshire Ward 1.pdf [Dataset]. https://freemaps-stlouiscovotes.hub.arcgis.com/documents/stlouiscovotes::city-of-lakeshire-ward-1-pdf/explore
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 17, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    St. Louis County Election Board
    Description

    A map of voter precincts within City of Lakeshire Ward 1.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
State of North Dakota (2011). NDGISHUB County Roads [Dataset]. https://gishubdata-ndgov.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/NDGOV::ndgishub-county-roads/explore

NDGISHUB County Roads

Explore at:
Dataset updated
May 9, 2011
Dataset authored and provided by
State of North Dakota
Area covered
Description

11/22/2024- County-wide road updates were completed in Golden Valley and Billings Counties. Intersecting routes throughout the state were cartographically realigned in preparation of MIRE intersections 6/27/2024 - The data was prepared for HPMS submittal which included updated 2023 AADT values and to keep certain segments consistent with HPMS segments, mainly sample sections and the NHS, values of "BOTH", "NHS" and "SAMPLE" were added to the field HPMS_ROUTE_ID to distinguish these segments from other segments. 3/19/2024 - Miscellaneous updates were done in Dunn County. County wide updates to Grand Forks and Golden Valley counties along with route realignments at intersections throughout the state.12/04/2023 - County wide updates to Walsh, Dunn and Grand Forks Counties and various updates to county/local roads throughout the state including street names in Westhope8/23/2023 - Function Class changes were updated in McLean and Mountrail Counties. Function Class updates also occurred in the cities of Fargo, Valley City, West Fargo and Williston. County-wide updates completed for: Towner, Cavalier, Pembina, Pierce, Benson, Ramsey. 2022 AADTs updated. A road was also removed in Bottineau County at the request off a landowner.5/19/22 - Dunn County contacted the NDDOT with data updates ,Rolette County was updated, and the 2021 AADT's were updated. 2/14/22 - Contacted by the Dunn County Road Dept., updates were made on newly paved road segments. 1/20/2022 - Since the August 2021 update, Morton, Stark, Hettinger, Bowman, Adams, Slope, Grant and Sioux Counties have been updated using 2020 imagery. Surface type has been checked and updated on all functionally classified roads statewide. Function Class changes have been made in the Bismarck/Mandan Metro, Grand Forks County and Burleigh County.6/15/21 - Since the 2019 update, trails and seldom used trails were updated statewide using 2018,and 2019 imagery. Steele, Traill and Griggs Counties have also been updated using 2020 imagery. Surface type has been checked and updated on all functionally classified roads statewide New roads added includes roads in the Fargo, West Fargo, Grand Forks, Jamestown, Bismarck, Mandan, Minot, Dickinson, Watford City and Williston. Ownership on Federal jurisdiction roads were also updated based on an dataset received for FHWA in conjunction with the HPMS submittal. HPMS (Highway Performance Monitoring System) fields were also added in an effort to integrate the roads county data into HPMS and MIRE (Model Inventory Roadway Elements). 9/14/20 - Added the following fields - AADT, AADT_YR, HPMS_MAINTENANCE_OPERATIONS, HPMS_THROUGH_LANES, FUNCTIONAL_CLASS (replaces FUNCTION_CLASS)8/13/19 - The following counties were updated by using a variety of aerial photography: Eddy, Foster and Barnes. Seldom used trails have been added to Barnes, Benson, Billings, Bottineau, and Bowman Counties. Mercer County had (2) 61STAvenues, this has been corrected.12/26/18 - The following counties have had their roads updated by a variety of aerial photography, McHenry, Wells, Kidder, Cass (with aid of Cass county website) and McKenzie (with aid of McKenzie County GIS Coordinator)8/14/18 - Counties updated using 2017 NAIP Imagery are Ward, Mountrail, Burke and Renville counties. Seldom used trails are also being digitized into the dataset. They are being added as counties are being checked, so it will take some time for all seldom used trails to be added statewide. Also since the last update, all local roads that are in the corporate boundaries have been broken at the boundaries so it is easier to query to determine which roads go with each community.5/21/18 - removed CITY_INT_ID column - no longer used because of CITY_FIPS and HPMS_URBAN_CODE attributes. Removed SERVICE_LEVEL field, never used/maintained.4/19/18 - added HPMS_OWNERSHIP and HPMS_FACILITY fields for HPMS submittal1/24/18 - added CITY_FIPS and HPMS_URBAN_CODE attributes/domains. These columns will replace CITY_INT_ID and SOURCE_ID columns (eventually).11/15/17 - Williams, Divide and Bottineau counties have been updated. Great effort has been taken to update attributes and QC null fields. Functional Classified roads in Bismarck and Mandan have been updated as have local roads in Bismarck, Mandan, Williston, Fargo – West Fargo and Minot. 1/25/17 - started to maintain roads in Esri's Road and Highways. The shapes now contain measures in miles along with the associated linear referencing/roads and highways fields. Removed INSET_ASSOC field and added COUNTY_FIPS field.Updates include the counties of Emmons, Logan, McIntosh, Lamoure, Dickey, Ransom, Sargent and Richland. These counties were updated using a combination of the available NAIP aerials, the DES aerials, and by car within the insets. In addition to these updates, the whole county dataset was edited using Data Reviewer checks. The checks ran included unnecessary nodes, non-linear segments, invalid geometry, Duplicate vertices with a tolerance of .5 meters, polyline closes of self, checked for cutbacks using a 15 degree minimum angle, checked for polyline length check using a distance less than 10 meters, checked for multipart lines, inspected dangles with a tolerance of 10 meters, and checked for orphans. All checks were inspected and fixed where appropriate.7/16/14 - updates include: Traill, Barnes, Stutsman, Kidder, Bowman, Slope, Stark, Hettinger, Adams, Grant, Sioux and Morton. These datasets were updated using a combination of the available NAIP aerials, the DES aerials, and by car within the insets.10/22/12 - city streets were updated in Bismarck, Dickinson, Minot and Williston. GIS data from the city of Bismarck was used to update Bismarck, GIS data and 2012 aerial photography was used to update the city of Williston, Minot’s city map and the 2010 aerial photography from Ward County was used to update Minot, and 2011 aerial photography and Dickinson’s "working" city map was used to update Dickinson. The counties updated were Williams, Burke, Bottineau, Mountrail, Ward, Wells, Eddy, Foster, Griggs, Steele, and Cass. At the time of this updated, approximately 50% of Stutsman and 50% of Traill Counties are updated. Williams, Bottineau, Ward, and Mountrail roads were inspected from the air and the 2009 NAIP photos were also used to assist the updates. The roads in Williams County were also recoded to match Williams County naming conventions. Williams County CADD map which is on the Williams county web site was used in updating the road names. In Ward County, the 2010 image from Ward County was used to assist in updating Ward County. The 2010 NAIP photos were used to update Wells, Eddy, Foster, Griggs and Steele Counties. Cass was updated with the assistance of the Cass County GIS layer and the 2011 Cass county imagery. 10/3/2011 - County roads were edited in the cities of Fargo, West Fargo, Horace, Minot, Bismarck, Devils Lake, Grafton, Williston, Valley City, and Dickinson. Also, a part of Ward and Mchenry Counties was edited and the county of Renville has been updated. The business routes through Bismarck and Jamestown were also edited. 5/9/2011 - Updated streets in Bismarck, Mandan, Jamestown, Dickinson, West Fargo ( not quite finished yet), and Valley City. Also, corrected the north - south roads in Township 144N Ranges 49 - 53 E, (in Traill County) 10/5/10 - The original Roads_County data was maintained in two separate ArcInfo coverages and then combined each year and exported to the NDHUB infrastructure. These two coverages have now been combined into one SDE feature class and is being edited within the SDE environment. The following changes have been made to feature class. Deleted all the A1 and A2 Fields so a person would have to hunt back and forth to find a road name. Road names consist of the following fields: RTE_ID, STR_TYP, SUF_DIR, & LAN_DIR. The CMC route numbers were moved from the A1_ prefixed fields to the CMC field to better track the CMC route. Created a County Highway field so we can enter the county road number. It consists of the counties name and number. This is still a work in progress. Created FS_RD_Number and FS_RD_Name fields to better track Forest Service roads. Created Bia-RD_Number and BIA_RD_Name fields to better track Bureau of Indian Affairs roads. The following field changes are used for NDDOT specific processes: Created a service level field which is something that may be used in the future. Currently it contains how Walsh County prioritizes their roads. Created a Through and Connecting Route field so we can so select routes through the towns and cities. This was created exclusively for the county base maps. Created an Inset Associated field. This was created so the information in the rd_misc would come into the county routes. In the future, it is planned to be deleted. 6/18/09 - Updated county routes from aerial observation and photo interpretation using 2003, 2005, 2006 NAIP photos and 2008 photography from Designs camera. Counties updated were Golden Valley, Billings, McKenzie, Dunn, Mercer, Oliver, McLean, Sheridan and Burleigh. City streets were rectified in these counties using the 2003 NAIP photos. Observations were performed by Steven Nelson. 4/17/08 - Updated road surface types in NE. Rolette, Pierce, Benson, Towner, Ramsey, Cavalier, Pembina, Walsh, Grand Forks and Nelson from the 2006 aerial observations by Dewaine Olson 2/13/07 - Updated via 2004 NAIP photos: Barnes, Cass, Eddy, Foster, Griggs, Kidder, Steele, Stutsman, Traill, Wells. Combined Misc Roads and County Roads. Blank fields mean unknown attribute. Use P_STREET_NAME for dynamic labeling. We are also in the process of removing all proposed roads. 12/28/05 - Counties updated: Emmons, Logan, Mcintosh, Lamoure, Dickey, Ransom, Sargent, Richland, Divide, Williams, Burke, Mountrail, Ward, Renville, Bottineau, and Mchenry This data came from the NDDOT's Mapping Section. The original data was digitized from hand scribed maps and registered

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu