Rob-N-Cin Farms is a 455-acre dairy factory farm that is currently noncompliant with zoning regulations with the Town of Trenton and illegally operating over the legal amount of animal units permitted. It is seeking a WPDES Permit as a Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) to gain compliance and the Town of Trenton is creating zoning laws to allow it to operate. The residents of Trenton have voiced concern over the operation of the farm spreading concentrated manure slurry in areas outside of its owned land. To better present the concerns of the residents, the Friends of Trenton need visuals to present to the town to present the impact it has to its residents in hopes the town will enact better laws and zoning to prevent the CAFO’s growth. Map is being used to accomplished this through analysis of the CAFO’s manure spread areas showing the number of houses impacted by its operation and an environmental analysis of its runoff into environmental areas.This map includes the full range of properties within Washington County and Ozaukee County.

This Zoning feature class is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework statewide, Zoning spatial data. This version is authorized for public use. Attributes include zoning districts that have been generalized to state classes. As of June 30, 2023, this feature class contains zoning data from 229 local jurisdictions. DLCD plans to continue adding to and updating this statewide zoning dataset as they receive zoning information from the local jurisdictions. Jurisdictions included in the latest version of the statewide zoning geodatabase: Cities: Adams, Adrian, Albany, Amity, Antelope, Ashland, Astoria, Athena, Aurora, Banks, Barlow, Bay City, Beaverton, Bend, Boardman, Bonanza, Brookings, Brownsville, Burns, Butte Falls, Canby, Cannon Beach, Carlton, Cascade Locks, Cave Junction, Central Point, Chiloquin, Coburg, Columbia City, Coos Bay, Cornelius, Corvallis, Cottage Grove, Creswell, Culver, Dayton, Detroit, Donald, Drain, Dufur, Dundee, Dunes City, Durham, Eagle Point, Echo, Enterprise, Estacada, Eugene, Fairview, Falls City, Florence, Forest Grove, Fossil, Garibaldi, Gaston, Gates, Gearhart, Gervais, Gladstone, Gold Beach, Gold Hill, Grants Pass, Grass Valley, Gresham, Halsey, Happy Valley, Harrisburg, Helix, Hermiston, Hillsboro, Hines, Hood River, Hubbard, Idanha, Independence, Jacksonville, Jefferson, Johnson City, Jordan Valley, Junction City, Keizer, King City, Klamath Falls, La Grande, La Pine, Lafayette, Lake Oswego, Lebanon, Lincoln City, Lowell, Lyons, Madras, Malin, Manzanita, Maupin, Maywood Park, McMinnville, Medford, Merrill, Metolius, Mill City, Millersburg, Milton-Freewater, Milwaukie, Mitchell, Molalla, Monmouth, Moro, Mosier, Mount Angel, Myrtle Creek, Myrtle Point, Nehalem, Newberg, Newport, North Bend, North Plains, Nyssa, Oakridge, Ontario, Oregon City, Pendleton, Philomath, Phoenix, Pilot Rock, Port Orford, Portland, Prescott, Prineville, Rainier, Redmond, Reedsport, Rivergrove, Rockaway Beach, Rogue River, Roseburg, Rufus, Saint Helens, Salem, Sandy, Scappoose, Scio, Scotts Mills, Seaside, Shady Cove, Shaniko, Sheridan, Sherwood, Silverton, Sisters, Sodaville, Spray, Springfield, Stanfield, Stayton, Sublimity, Sutherlin, Sweet Home, Talent, Tangent, The Dalles, Tigard, Tillamook, Toledo, Troutdale, Tualatin, Turner, Ukiah, Umatilla, Vale, Veneta, Vernonia, Warrenton, Wasco, Waterloo, West Linn, Westfir, Weston, Wheeler, Willamina, Wilsonville, Winston, Wood Village, Woodburn, Yamhill. Counties: Baker County, Benton County, Clackamas County, Clatsop County, Columbia County, Coos County, Crook County, Curry County, Deschutes County, Douglas County, Harney County, Hood River County, Jackson County, Jefferson County, Josephine County, Klamath County, Lane County, Lincoln County, Linn County, Malheur County, Marion County, Multnomah County, Polk County, Sherman County, Tillamook County, Umatilla County, Union County, Wasco County, Washington County, Wheeler County, Yamhill County. R emaining jurisdictions either chose not to share data to incorporate into the public, statewide dataset or did not respond to DLCD’s request for data. These jurisdictions’ attributes are designated “not shared” in the orZDesc field and “NS” in the orZCode field.

Use this web map to link to other geospatial datasets available through county and city sites (Not comprehensive). May need to zoom in to see the participating cities. The county boundaries and city points were published by Washington State agencies and downloaded from geo.wa.gov. Locations are approximate, and no warranties are made regarding this data. The canvas basemap has been compiled by Esri and the ArcGIS user community from a variety of best available sources. Want to have your data site listed? Contact the Geospatial Program Office.

This map identifies approved and in process land development projects within Washington County, MD. It also includes information on service requests, grading plans, traffic impact studies, forestry records, zoning, zoning overlays, and plats. This is NOT an inclusive map.

This polygon feature contains geographic and attribute information for the purpose of depicting Zoning Areas within the City of SeaTac, Washington. Last updated December 5, 2018.

Description

This polygon feature contains geographic and attribute information for the purpose of depicting Zoning Areas within the City of SeaTac, Washington. The data was compiled from existing zoning information and King County parcel data.To implement the SeaTac Comprehensive Plan's policies and objectives and the goals of the State Growth Management Act (GMA); To protect health, safety, and general welfare; To provide for the economic, social, and aesthetic advantages of orderly development and redevelopment through harmonious groupings of compatible and complementary land uses and the application of appropriate development standards; To provide for adequate public facilities and services in conjunction with development; To ensure public safety by restricting development of lands containing physical hazards and to minimize the adverse environmental impacts of development; and To ensure that land use decisions are made in accordance with the public interest and applicable laws of the State of Washington, including the Growth Management Act and subsequent amendments (Ord. 92-1041 --1)Updates to Zoning were made per Ordinance 18-1005, data was updated 3/28/2018.Updates to the Zoning were made per ORD17-1022, data was updated December 2017.Last amended in December 2015.The change to Angle Lake District Area Boundary was adopted on July 9th, 2015 (Ord. 15-1010).UL-5000 was changed to High Density Single Family Overlay Zone (HDS-OZ) on Nov 10, 2015.Segale properties were rezoned to UH-900 on Dec 8, 2015.Pursuant to Article XI, Section 11 of Washington State Constitution (Ord. 92-1041 -- 1). Zoning boundaries have been adjusted to line up with King County Assessor parcel lines that were improved in 2006 and 2007. Slivers and gaps will appear if this zoning layer is overlaid with historical zoning layers. The geometry of this data derives from KC parcel data which is updated quarterly. Then it was intersected with the existing zoning data to trasfer the attribute.Incorporated in February 1990, the City of SeaTac is located in the Pacific Northwest, approximately midway between the cities of Seattle and Tacoma in the State of Washington. SeaTac is a vibrant community, economically strong, environmentally sensitive, and people-oriented. The City boundaries surround the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, (approximately 3 square miles in area) which is owned and operated by the Port of Seattle. For additional information regarding the City of SeaTac, its people, or services, please visit https://www.seatacwa.gov. For additional information regarding City GIS data or maps, please visit https://www.seatacwa.gov/our-city/maps-and-gis.

This data identifies current as well as proposed zoning and land use designations that are adopted by ordinances for unincorporated Pierce County. Zoning for cities is not included in this dataset. Zones are adopted by ordinances with specific technicalities for each community. Land Use designations offer a broad spectrum of allowable uses within a community. It is used to create a Comprehensive Plan Map or used for a Generalized Proposed Land Use Map or GPLUM. This dataset is also used to create the Land Use Designations theme, which covers proposed zoning use. The meaning of proposed is that the property might not be currently used for the purpose stated. It should be noted that Council adopted amendments to land use designations/zoning that will be effective at the beginning of 2006. Also, the Council is in the process of adopting the Mid-County Community Plan which amends land use designations/zoning as well. The Cities polygons found in the zoning data does not necessarily match the current cities boundaries. This is because the zoning data is updated once a year per the "Pierce County Comprehensive Plan" and does not allow for changes to be made during the year. The Comprehensive Plan is generally updated in November and generally becomes effective the following March. Use the "Cities in Pierce County" data set to determine current city boundaries. City boundaries can change more often than the current adopted Pierce County Zoning data. The zoning data contains the "Cities in Pierce County" boundaries at the time that the Pierce County Zoning was adopted. When determining the current zoning of a parcel near a city, the current "Cities in Pierce County" data set needs to be reviewed. Zoning codes for parcels within incorporated cities are determined by the city that the parcel is within. Please read metadata for additional information (https://matterhorn.piercecountywa.gov/GISmetadata/pdbplan_zoning.html). Any data download constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use (https://matterhorn.piercecountywa.gov/Disclaimer/PierceCountyGISDataTermsofUse.pdf).

Title 23 of the Grant County Code is comprised of Chapters 23.04 – Zoning Districts, 23.08 – Performance and Use-specific Standards, and 23.12 – Development Standards, and official zoning maps, and shall be known as the zoning code of Grant County, Washington.The zoning code is intended to carry out the goals and policies of the Grant County Comprehensive Plan, and to benefit the public as a whole and not any specific person or class of persons. The zoning code classifies, designates, and regulates the development of land for agriculture, mineral resource extraction, residential, commercial, industrial, recreation, tourism and public land uses for the unincorporated area of Grant County.Last update1/17/2020 – Comprehensive plan amendments of 2019:Parcel 201542000 converted from Urban Commercial 2 to Urban Residential 1Parcel 201358008 converted from Rural Residential 1 to AgriculturalParcel 160788000 converted from Rural Residential 1 to Urban Residential 2Parcel 151107000 converted from Rural Residential 1 to AgriculturalParcel 170983000 converted from Rural Remote to Urban Heavy IndustrialParcel 313169000 converted from Rural Urban Reserve to Urban Commercial 2Parcel 211912000 converted from Agricultural to Rural Residential 15/17/2019 – the boundary between AG and RC was corrected to follow the north parcel line of 201370001. The parcel boundary of 201370001 had changed in 2007 but the zoning wasn’t adjusted at that time.3/25/2019 – small areas within the Desert Aire open space area were corrected because they were inadvertently missed during the 7/2/2018 update.1/17/2019 - a small portion of Desert Aire zoning was changed from RVOC to RVC.8/1/2018 – minor designation errors were corrected.7/2/2018 – a new Comprehensive Plan was adopted.

This data set is the Kitsap County Zoning Designations. Kitsap County Comprehensive Planning Map Series This map represents the Land Use Map for Kitsap County's Comprehensive Plan as approved by the Kitsap County Board of Commissioners for submittal to the State of Washington pursuant to the Washington State Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A) on May 7, 1998. The shaded land use designations are defined in the text of the Land Use Element available from the Department of Community Development. NOTE: This map was developed for general land use planning purposes. The user of this map must assume responsibility for determining its suitability for other purposes. Amendments: February 8, 1999 Forest Resource Lands; April 19, 1999 Suquamish Rural Village; May 10, 1999 Modified Joint Planning Area; July 21, 1999 Port Gamble Rural Historic Town; June 10, 2002 Manchester Community Plan; June 10, 2002 Ord No. 274-2002 (Comp Plan Amendments); September 8, 2003 Res No. 168-2003 (Map Corrections); December 8, 2003 Ord No. 311-2003 (Comp Plan Amendments); October 25, 2004 George's Corner Commercial LAMIRD; October 25, 2004 Ord No. 326-2004 (Comp Plan Amendments); December 22, 2005 Ord No. 352-2005 (Comp Plan Amendments); December 11, 2006 Ord No. 370-2006 (10-Year Update); June 11, 2007 Ord No. 384-2007 Repeal of Urban Holding Zone (UHA); November 19, 2007 Ord No. 402-2007 Keyport LAMIRD; December 31, 2007 Ord No. 405-2007 Comprehensive Plan Amendments; October 13, 2008 Ord No. 414-2008 Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Amendments; December 23, 2008 Ord No. 420-2008 Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Amendments; December 14, 2009 Ord No. 443-2009 Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Amendments; December 15, 2010 Ord No. 467-2010 Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Amendments; December 15, 2010 Ord No. 467-2010 Type III LAMIRDS; August 31, 2012 Ord No. 493-2012 Urban Growth Area - Remand; January 15, 2014 Ord No. 511-2013 Gorst Watershed Plan; June 30, 2016 Ord No, 534-2016 Comprehensive Plan 10-year update; March 12, 2018 Ord No. 553-2018 Rezone; December 10, 2018 Ord No. 565-2018 Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Amendments; November 25, 2019 Ord No. 583-2019 Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Amendment (Repeal of 565-2018); April 27, 2020 Ord No. 587-2020 Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Amendments; November 21, 2021 Ord No. 603-2021 Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Amendments; December 13, 2021 Res No. 232-2021 Development Agreement/Zoning Amendments; January 10, 2022 Ord No. 609-2022 Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Amendments; April 14, 2022 Ord No. 612-2022, Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Amendments; November 13, 2023 Ord No. 628-2023 Rezone, Comprehensive Plan Update: December 16, 2024 Ord No. 637-2024

A web map used to access tax parcel, boundary, ownership, acreage, survey, zoning and tax information. Errors and Omissions Do Exist.The information provided is for reference only and subject to independent verification. User assumes all responsibility for its use.https://www.fayette-co-oh.com/Fayette County ProfileFayette County is a county located in the U.S. state of Ohio. Its county seat is Washington Court House. Fayette County was formed on March 1, 1810 from portions of Highland County and Ross County. It was named after Marie-Joseph Motier, Marquis de La Fayette, a French general and politician who took the side of the Colonials during the American Revolutionary War and who played an important role in the French Revolution.Fayette County is a part of the Virginia Military survey, which was reserved in 1783, to be allotted to Virginia soldiers. This district includes the entire counties of Adams, Brown, Clermont, Clinton, Highland, Fayette, Madison and Union; and a portion of the counties of Scioto, Pike, Ross, Pickaway, Franklin, Delaware, Marion, Hardin, Logan, Champaign, Clarke, Greene, Warren and Hamilton.Fayette County was formed January 19, 1810 (took effect March 1st) from Ross and Highland counties. Beginning at the southwest corner of Pickaway, running north “with the line of said county to the corner of Madison; thence west with the line of said Madison county to the line of Greene county; thence south with the line of Greene county to the southeast corner thereof; thence east five miles; thence south to the line of Highland county; thence east with said line to Paint Creek; thence in a straight line to the beginning.” All the lower portion was taken from Highland and the upper from Ross.The first portion of land entered within the territory of what is now Fayette county, was a part of original surveys Nos. 243 and 772, lying partly in Clinton county. The first survey lying wholly within Fayette county was No. 463, in what is now Madison township, surveyed for Thomas Overton by John O’Bannon June 30, 1776.The original townships were Jefferson, Greene, Wayne, Madison, Paint and Union. Concord township was formed in April 1818, from Greene. Marion township was formed in June, 1840 from Madison. Perry township was formed June 4, 1845, from Wayne and Greene. Jasper township was formed from Jefferson and Concord December 2, 1845.Washington C.H. was laid out originally on a part of entry 757, which contained 1200 acres and belonged to Benjamin Temple, of Logan county, Kentucky, who donated 150 acres to Fayette county, on condition that it be used as the site of the county seat. The deed of conveyance was made December 1, 1810, by Thomas S. Hind, attorney for Temple, to Robert Stewart, who was appointed by the legislature as director for the town of Washington. The town was laid off some time between December 1, 1810, and February 26, 1811, the latter being the date of the record of the town plat.Bloomingburg (originally called New Lexington) was laid out in 1815, by Solomon Bowers, and originally contained 34 and ¾ acres. On March 4, 1816, Bowers laid out and added twenty more lots. The name of the town was later changed to Bloomingburg by act of the legislature. The town was incorporated by act of the legislature, February 5, 1847.Jeffersonville was laid out March 1, 1831, by Walter B. Write and Chipman Robinson, on 100 acres of land belonging to them, they started selling the lots at $5 each. The town incorporated March 17, 1838. The first house was erected by Robert Wyley.The first railroad, now the C. & M. V., was completed in 1852; the second, now the Detroit Southern, in 1875; the third, now the C.H. & D. in 1879; and the fourth, now the B. & O. S. W., in 1884.The first permanent settler (probably) was a Mr. Wolf who settled in what is now Wayne township, in about the year 1796. - Circa 1886 - Map of Fayette County, Ohio. Issued by the Fayette County Record.

A bug has been logged for the 403 error which is generated when trying to download large datasets through the Download menu. As a workaround, the zipped file geodatabase is available here:https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/d04a50e44fbd4497bb57830b52fe5a2b/dataThe Washington State Land Use coverage was produced from digital county tax parcel layers using Department of Revenue (DOR) two digit land use codes (see; WAC 458-53-030, Stratification of assessment rolls - real property). Land use attribute data has been normalized for all county parcel data to conform to the two digit DOR codes. All county parcel layers are dissolved using the normalized land use code. No county parcel information remains in this data other that what geometry remains from the dissolve process.

Zoning overlay polygons for unincorporated Pierce County as identified in the Pierce County comprehensive plan.Please read the metadata (https://matterhorn.piercecountywa.gov/GISmetadata/pdbplan_zoning_overlay.html) for additional information. Any data download constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use (https://matterhorn.piercecountywa.gov/disclaimer/PierceCountyGISDataTermsofUse.pdf).

Download .zipThis coverage land represents an interpretation of land use and land cover types done from aerial photography by Tom Eller, Remote Sensing Unit, Division of Water. For an explanation of categories see Ohio Land Use/ Cover Classifications System, Misc. Report 17 available upon request, or at http://apps.ohiodnr.gov/geodata/documents/Ohio_LULC_Misc_Report17.pdf . This publication is keyed to the four digit code found in the OCAPCODE item name code description.

This coverage was digitized from Land Use/ Land Cover drafted onto USGS quadrangle maps utilizing a run length encoding technique sampling along horizontal lines which represent the midline of cells with a height of 250 feet . The measurement increment along these horizontal lines was one decafoot (10 feet) the quadrangle files were then merged into a county file which was subsequently converted to ARC / Info format.

The user should bear in mind that this coverage is only an approximation of the Land Use / Land Cover as drafted. Blue line copies of the original Land Use / Land Cover interpretation can be provided for a nominal charge.

Additional details on the digitizing process are available on request.

Original coverage data was converted from the .e00 file to a more standard ESRI shapefile(s) in November 2014.Contact Information:GIS Support, ODNR GIS ServicesOhio Department of Natural ResourcesReal Estate & Land ManagementReal Estate and Lands Management2045 Morse Rd, Bldg I-2Columbus, OH, 43229Telephone: 614-265-6462Email: gis.support@dnr.ohio.gov Data Update Frequency: As Needed

This dataset combines the work of several different projects to create a seamless data set for the contiguous United States. Data from four regional Gap Analysis Projects and the LANDFIRE project were combined to make this dataset. In the northwestern United States (Idaho, Oregon, Montana, Washington and Wyoming) data in this map came from the Northwest Gap Analysis Project. In the southwestern United States (Colorado, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah) data used in this map came from the Southwest Gap Analysis Project. The data for Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Virginia came from the Southeast Gap Analysis Project and the California data was generated by the updated California Gap land cover project. The Hawaii Gap Analysis project provided the data for Hawaii. In areas of the county (central U.S., Northeast, Alaska) that have not yet been covered by a regional Gap Analysis Project, data from the Landfire project was used. Similarities in the methods used by these projects made possible the combining of the data they derived into one seamless coverage. They all used multi-season satellite imagery (Landsat ETM+) from 1999-2001 in conjunction with digital elevation model (DEM) derived datasets (e.g. elevation, landform) to model natural and semi-natural vegetation. Vegetation classes were drawn from NatureServe's Ecological System Classification (Comer et al. 2003) or classes developed by the Hawaii Gap project. Additionally, all of the projects included land use classes that were employed to describe areas where natural vegetation has been altered. In many areas of the country these classes were derived from the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD). For the majority of classes and, in most areas of the country, a decision tree classifier was used to discriminate ecological system types. In some areas of the country, more manual techniques were used to discriminate small patch systems and systems not distinguishable through topography. The data contains multiple levels of thematic detail. At the most detailed level natural vegetation is represented by NatureServe's Ecological System classification (or in Hawaii the Hawaii GAP classification). These most detailed classifications have been crosswalked to the five highest levels of the National Vegetation Classification (NVC), Class, Subclass, Formation, Division and Macrogroup. This crosswalk allows users to display and analyze the data at different levels of thematic resolution. Developed areas, or areas dominated by introduced species, timber harvest, or water are represented by other classes, collectively refered to as land use classes; these land use classes occur at each of the thematic levels. Raster data in both ArcGIS Grid and ERDAS Imagine format is available for download at http://gis1.usgs.gov/csas/gap/viewer/land_cover/Map.aspx Six layer files are included in the download packages to assist the user in displaying the data at each of the Thematic levels in ArcGIS. In adition to the raster datasets the data is available in Web Mapping Services (WMS) format for each of the six NVC classification levels (Class, Subclass, Formation, Division, Macrogroup, Ecological System) at the following links. http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Class_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Subclass_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Formation_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Division_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Macrogroup_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_Ecological_Systems_Landuse/MapServer

School districts for elementary schools in Johnson City and Washington County, TN.

November 2025

Land Use Zoning in Jefferson County, Washington.

Zoning boundaries for unincorporated King County; WA. Created layers using parcels, cities, and legal descriptions. This is the version with the cities clipped out. This is used for GISMO and by KCGIS. We have another version that is presently being maintained as coverage that includes city areas.

Land use codes assigned to parcels by the San Juan County WA Assessor's OfficeField DefinitionsUse Code - The first two digits represent the land use codes in WAC 458-53-030(5). The third and fourth digits are used internally by the San Juan County Assessor's Office to identify specific primary use or uses on a parcel.Description - Text that describes the Use Code.ABS Code - Abstract category of Use Code as seen in WAC 458-53-050.

From 1999 thru March 30, 2015, records show a total of 28 ZAA (Zoning Amendments, e.g. County-approved zoning changes) decisions were issued. It is not known what, if any, processes or procedures existed to update the Zoning layer when a ZAA was approved. It is likely that some, but not all, of these changes are reflected in the Zoning Layer. It is possible that none of these changes are correctly reflected in the Zoning layer. Annexations since 1999 may not be accurately reflected in this layer.It is not known if any double-checking or quality-control process has ever been done between the Official Zoning Atlases kept in the Planning Department and the Zoning layer. Experience has shown very little inconsistency between the Zoning Atlases and the Zoning layer during work in the Planning Department. It expected that the accuracy rate between the Zoning layer and Zoning Atlases is greater than 95%. This layer is accurate to the parcel level. Some parcels may be slightly shifted. Any shifting that has occurred is expected to be less than 15 feet in any direction.

The geographic boundaries of Montgomery County's incorporated City, Towns or Villages. In Montgomery County, municipalities are divided by whether a jurisdiction has zoning authority or not. Those with zoning authority include, Barnesville, Brookeville, Gaithersburg, Laytonsville, Poolesville, Rockville and Washington Grove. The rest of the municipalities abide by the Montgomery County Planning Department zoning code.For more information, contact: GIS Manager Information Technology & Innovation (ITI) Montgomery County Planning Department, MNCPPC T: 301-650-5620