The Parcel layer consists of parcels that are areas land in which the Department of Natural Resources holds some interest and are located anywhere in the upland area of the State of Washington. Three types of Parcels are currently held in the parcel layer. The number of Parcel types may increase in the future. Ownership Parcels, parcel type code 1, consist of Washington State owned land managed by the Department of Natural Resources. Most ownership parcels are held and managed for the benefit of some trust such as the Common School and Indemnity trust. Of the several parcel types, only Ownership Parcels represent the entire extent of the particular type of land managed by DNR. The other parcel types are incomplete data sets. Disposed Parcels, parcel type code 2, consist of ownership parcels that have been disposed of since July 1, 2007. A very few parcels disposed of prior to that date are also included. Easement Parcels, parcel type code 3, consist of various types of easements acquired for the State by the Department. Some of the Easements are negative easements over land not owned by the State, for example Conservation Easements which remove certain development rights away for the parcel owner. Other Easements are positive rights acquired by the State, such as roadway easements.WA DNR Managed Land Parcels Metadata

The NDMPL (Washington State Non-Department of Natural Resources Major Public Lands) data contains ownership parcels for Federal, State (excluding WA DNR), County and City lands within the State of Washington. It also includes Tribal administrative boundaries. The NDMPL data layer is a polygon dataset and does not contain arc attribute information for ownership boundaries. This data is not connected to WA DNR's Cadastre layers (these data include WADNR ownership, Public Land Survey System and other cadastral data). As updates are made to Cadastre layers, they may not be reflected in NDMPL.WA Major Public Lands MetadataClick to downloadThis layer was last updated October 2021.

Washington Department of Natural Resources Local Unit. These areas are administrative subunits of a Washington Department of Natural Resources District.WA DNR Units Metadata

This application uses map services to provide geologic maps, data, and related information. There are several earth-science mapping themes to view by using the 'Map Theme' option from the toolbar. Using our interactive maps, you can create, save, and print custom maps, find out more information about map features, and download map data for use in a geographic information system (GIS). Please note that because of the volume of data available through these interactive maps, data loading and identification operations may not be instantaneous. Online, interactive web map with multiple layers; includes: geothermal, seismogenic, landslides, geophysical, volcanic vents, geology, topo, bathymetry, relief, imagery, base layers, Tsunami inundation zones.

Washington Department of Natural Resources Districts. These areas are administrative subunits of a Washington Department of Natural Resources Region.WA DNR Districts MetadataDownload Link

The Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) was asked by the state Legislature to provide an inventory of lands in Washington owned by federal, state, and local governments, and by Native American tribes by July 1, 2014 (2013-15 Capital Budget proviso, Section 3174 of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5035).The Public Lands Inventory focuses on natural resource and recreation lands and shows ownership (federal, by agency; state, by agency; local government, by county or city), ownership type (fee simple or assumed fee simple; aquatic, upland, or assumed upland), location, acreage, principal use (developed recreation, habitat and passive recreation, revenue generation, conservation, assumed habitat and passive recreation, other, or unknown), and the date and cost of recent acquisitions (within the past ten years).

Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Regions. These are the largest DNR administrative areas.WA DNR Regions MetadataClick to download

Click to downloadClick for metadataService URL: https://gis.dnr.wa.gov/site3/rest/services/Public_Boundaries/WADNR_PUBLIC_Cadastre_OpenData/FeatureServer/10Official Washington State boundary

For large areas, like Washington State, download as a file geodatabase. Large data sets like this one, for the State of Washington, may exceed the limits for downloading as shape files, excel files, or KML files. For areas less than a county, you may use the map to zoom to your area and download as shape file, excel or KML, if that format is desired.The Boundary layer consists of lines representing the boundaries of Parcels and Legal Descriptions. (See the metadata for those two layers.) Boundary lines are the places that are surveyed in order to delimit the extent of Parcels and Legal Descriptions. The character and accuracy of Boundary locations is held in the attributes of the Points that are at the ends of Boundary lines. All the boundaries of Parcels and Legal Descriptions are covered by a Boundary line. Currently the Boundary layer has little functionality. The only distinction it makes is between upland boundaries and shorelines. In the future Boundary lines will have a richer set of attributes in order to accommodate cartographic needs to distinguish between types of boundaries.WA Boundaries Metadata

Washington State County Boundaries including Department of Natural Resources (DNR) county codes. This data is created from the WA Public Land Survey source data maintained by the DNR.WA County Boundaries Metadata

PLS Township. In the Public Land Survey System a Township refers to a unit of land, that is nominally six miles on a side, usually containing 36 sections, some of which are designed to correct for the convergence of meridians or range lines, with boundaries conforming to meridians and parallels within established limits.WA Public Land Survey Townships MetadataClick for downloadService URL: https://fortress.wa.gov/dnr/arcgisext/weba_ext_prod4/rest/services/Cadastre/WADNR_Cadastre_OpenData/MapServer/8

The USGS Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) is the nation's inventory of protected areas, including public open space and voluntarily provided, private protected areas, identified as an A-16 National Geospatial Data Asset in the Cadastral Theme (http://www.fgdc.gov/ngda-reports/NGDA_Datasets.html). PAD-US is an ongoing project with several published versions of a spatial database of areas dedicated to the preservation of biological diversity, and other natural, recreational or cultural uses, managed for these purposes through legal or other effective means. The geodatabase maps and describes public open space and other protected areas. Most areas are public lands owned in fee; however, long-term easements, leases, and agreements or administrative designations documented in agency management plans may be included. The PAD-US database strives to be a complete “best available” inventory of protected areas (lands and waters) including data provided by managing agencies and organizations. The dataset is built in collaboration with several partners and data providers (http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/stewards/). See Supplemental Information Section of this metadata record for more information on partnerships and links to major partner organizations. As this dataset is a compilation of many data sets; data completeness, accuracy, and scale may vary. Federal and state data are generally complete, while local government and private protected area coverage is about 50% complete, and depends on data management capacity in the state. For completeness estimates by state: http://www.protectedlands.net/partners. As the federal and state data are reasonably complete; focus is shifting to completing the inventory of local gov and voluntarily provided, private protected areas. The PAD-US geodatabase contains over twenty-five attributes and four feature classes to support data management, queries, web mapping services and analyses: Marine Protected Areas (MPA), Fee, Easements and Combined. The data contained in the MPA Feature class are provided directly by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Marine Protected Areas Center (MPA, http://marineprotectedareas.noaa.gov ) tracking the National Marine Protected Areas System. The Easements feature class contains data provided directly from the National Conservation Easement Database (NCED, http://conservationeasement.us ) The MPA and Easement feature classes contain some attributes unique to the sole source databases tracking them (e.g. Easement Holder Name from NCED, Protection Level from NOAA MPA Inventory). The "Combined" feature class integrates all fee, easement and MPA features as the best available national inventory of protected areas in the standard PAD-US framework. In addition to geographic boundaries, PAD-US describes the protection mechanism category (e.g. fee, easement, designation, other), owner and managing agency, designation type, unit name, area, public access and state name in a suite of standardized fields. An informative set of references (i.e. Aggregator Source, GIS Source, GIS Source Date) and "local" or source data fields provide a transparent link between standardized PAD-US fields and information from authoritative data sources. The areas in PAD-US are also assigned conservation measures that assess management intent to permanently protect biological diversity: the nationally relevant "GAP Status Code" and global "IUCN Category" standard. A wealth of attributes facilitates a wide variety of data analyses and creates a context for data to be used at local, regional, state, national and international scales. More information about specific updates and changes to this PAD-US version can be found in the Data Quality Information section of this metadata record as well as on the PAD-US website, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/data/history/.) Due to the completeness and complexity of these data, it is highly recommended to review the Supplemental Information Section of the metadata record as well as the Data Use Constraints, to better understand data partnerships as well as see tips and ideas of appropriate uses of the data and how to parse out the data that you are looking for. For more information regarding the PAD-US dataset please visit, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/. To find more data resources as well as view example analysis performed using PAD-US data visit, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/resources/. The PAD-US dataset and data standard are compiled and maintained by the USGS Gap Analysis Program, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/ . For more information about data standards and how the data are aggregated please review the “Standards and Methods Manual for PAD-US,” http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/data/standards/ .

Statewide Ecopia 3 foot Land Cover (2021-2022)This raster land cover data is based off of high-resolution statewide imagery from 2021-2022. It was used by Ecopia to extract and digitize the entire state into 7 different land cover classes. Download Notes:This service can be entered into ArcGIS Pro where "Download Rasters" can be used to download approximately 20 square miles at a time. (Rt. click layer in TOC > Data > Download Rasters)Alternatively, the entire statewide 3ft dataset is available as a zipped download from here (includes colormap file): Ecopia_Statewide_3ft_Raster_TilesClasses available at bottom of this pages.Data SpecificationImagery Used for Extraction: Pixel resolution: 15 cm (6")Camera sensor: Hexagon Pushbroom (Content Mapper)Date of capture: 06/25/2021 - 08/14/2022Date of Vector Extraction: June 2023Extraction Methodology:Ecopia uses proprietary extraction and modeling software to process raw images into high-resolution land cover classifications.Quality Measurements:Measure Name - Threshold across Impervious Polygons:False Negatives <= 5% All PolygonsFalse Positives <= 5% All PolygonsValid Interpretation >= 95% All PolygonsMinimum Area 100% All PolygonsValid Geometry 100% All PolygonsMeasure Name - Threshold across Natural Polygons:False Negatives <=5% All PolygonsFalse Positives <=5% All PolygonsValid Interpretation >=90% All PolygonsMinimum Area 100% All PolygonsValid Geometry 100% All PolygonsLand Cover Classes:UnclassifiedImperviousImpervious, covered by treesShrub/low vegetationTree/forest/high vegetationOpen waterRailroadVegetation (Canopy Mapping)Tree canopy will be captured as a unique polygon layer. It can therefore overlap impervious layers.High vegetation is distinguished from low vegetation based on crown, texture, and derived height models. Leveraging stereo imagery produces results using 3D elevation models used to aid the distinction of vegetation categories. Distinguishing low from high vegetation is based on a 5m threshold, but this is not always feasible, especially in areas where heavy canopy prevents a visualization of the ground. In these circumstances, high vegetation will be given the priority over low vegetation. For more information visit: www.ecopiatech.comClasses:0: No data - Null, clear1: Unclassified2: Impervious3: Impervious, Covered by Tree Canopy6: Shrub/Low Vegetation7: Tree/Forest/High Vegetation8: Open Water12: Railroad

The Point layer covers the State of Washington with a variety of different types of locations. The great majority of Points, point type 1, Corner Point, are located at the corners, or angle points, of Legal Description and Parcel areas. (See the metadata for Legal Description and Parcel.) Corner Points can represent differing types of locations such as surveyed monuments, locations calculated by survey, locations digitized from various maps like US Geological Survey quadrangles, and locations that serve no other purpose than to stabilize the endpoint of a Boundary or angle point of a Legal Description or Parcel. Points are the only features in the upland Cadastre that have attributes regarding the source and accuracy of the data. The known accuracy of the data varies dramatically from place to place. The attributes also indicate whether there is a known physical object to look for on the ground. The second type of Point, Geodetic Control Point, point type 2, is not currently populated. The third type of Point, Significant Coordinated Location, point type 3, can be used to store any type of point location that has cadastral significance. At present, the only Significant Coordinated Points in Cadastre are those points along the Washington Pacific Ocean coast which were used by the US Minerals Management Service to calculate the boundary of the State at one marine league from the coast.WA Public Land Survey Points MetadataClick to download

This dataset describes Tribal Lands in Washington State. Included are areas where the tribes ceded title to their historic areas of use to the U.S. Government through various treaties enacted during the later half of the 19th century. Boundary lines have been digitized from a variety of digital data sources including 1:100,000 streams for boundaries described in treaties as following a stream or river, 1:24k Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA), Watershed Administrative Unit (WAU) and Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) boundaries for boundaries referred to in treaties as 'divide', 'summit' or 'between the waters of', 1:100,000 Major Public Lands (for current reservation areas), 10 meter DEM and 7.5 minute USGS digital Quad maps (to define ridgelines and 'divide' where WRIA, WAU or HUC boundaries don't exist) and NAIP orthophoto imagery (to get a feel for what a questionable boundary area actually looks like today). Ceded Land treaty areas are based on treaty language and US Government decrees dated 1854-1892. Natural geographic barriers such as streams and ridge lines were used where described or eluded to in treaty descriptions. Coordinate based latitude/longitude boundary lines were used in some Central Washington areas where described. References to general compass directions were followed using natural barriers such as watershed boundaries or drainages wherever possible. Some treaty boundary descriptions were found to be inadequate, inaccurate and in some cases misleading in nature in describing what should have been a natural boundary or even a coordinate based solution to a property description. Some of these boundary areas open to interpretation are discussed below in the Supplemental Information based on the language and definite boundaries of other treaty areas. Ceded areas in Oregon and Idaho from the Camp Stevens Treaties have been included in this dataset. The Washington State Department of Ecology makes no warranty for the accuracy of this material and is not libel for its use. Ecology will maintain this data layer for its own use and distribute to all interested parties. Updates, corrections and documentation should be submitted to the contact person. This data may or may not reflect the most current tribal reservation areas. Tribal reservations are updated regularly in the Major Public Lands (MPL) layer maintained by Washington State Department of Natural Resources. This GIS data is draft information and a work in progress and should be used only as a generalized visual guide to 150 year old treaties of limited content.

Click to downloadClick for metadataService URL: https://gis.dnr.wa.gov/site2/rest/services/Public_Forest_Practices/WADNR_PUBLIC_FP_Unstable_Slopes/MapServer/3The siteclass data layer was created for use in implementing Forest Practices' Riparian Management Rules. (See WAC 222-30-021 and 222-30-022.)

The siteclass data layer was derived from the DNR soils data layer's site index codes and major tree species codes for western and eastern Washington soils contained in the layer's Soils-Main table and Soils-Pflg (private forest land grade) table. Site index ranges in the Soils_PFLG took precedence over site index ranges in the Soils-Main table where data existed.The siteclass data layer was created for use in implementing new ForestPractices' Riparian Management Rules. (See WAC 222-30-021 and 222-30-022.) The siteclass information was derived from the DNR soils data layer's site indexcodes and major tree species codes for western and eastern Washington soilscontained in the layer's Soils-Main table and Soils-Pflg (private forest landgrade) table. Site index ranges in the Soils_PFLG took precedence over siteindex ranges in the Soils-Main table where data existed.Siteclass codes as derived from the soil survey:For Western Washington, the 50 year site index is used SITECLASS SITE INDEX RANGE I 137+ II 119-136 III 97-118 IV 76-96 V 1-75For Eastern Washington, the 100 year site index is used SITECLASS SITE INDEX RANGE I 120+ II 101-120 III 81-100 IV 61-80 V 1-60In addition to the coding scheme above, the following codes were added forrule compliance: SITECLASS DESCRIPTION 6 (Red Alder) The soils major species code indicated Red Alder 7 (ND/GP) No data), NA, or gravel pit 8 (NC/MFP) Non-commercial or marginal commercial forest land 9 (WAT) Water body(Rule note: If the site index does not exist or indicates red alder,noncommercial, or marginally commercial species, the following apply:If the whole RMZ width is within those categories, use site class V.If those categories occupy only a portion of the RMZ width, then use thesite index for conifer in the adjacent soil polygon.)WADNR SOILS LAYER INFORMATION LAYER: SOILS GEN.SOURCE: State soils mapping program CODE DOCUMENT: State soil surveys CONTACT: NA COVER TYPE: Spatial polygon coverage DATA TYPE: Primary data Information for the SOILS data layer was derived from the Private Forest Land Grading system (PFLG) and subsequent soil surveys. PFLG was a five year mapping program completed in 1980 for the purpose of forest land taxation. It was funded by the Washington State Department of Revenue in cooperation with the Department of Natural Resources, Soil Conservation Service (SCS), USDA Forest Service and Washington State University. State and private lands which had the potential of supporting commercial forest stands were surveyed. Some Indian tribal and federal lands were surveyed. Because this was a cooperative soil survey project, agricultural and non- commercial forest lands were also included within some survey areas. After the Department of Natural Resources originally developed its geographic information system, digitized soils delineations and a few soil attributes were transferred to the system. Remaining PFLG soil attributes were added at a later time and are now available through associated lookup tables. SCS soils data on agricultural lands also have subsequently been added to this data layer. Approximately 1100 townships wholly or partially contain digitized soils data (2101 townships would provide complete coverage of the state of Washington). SOILS data are currently stored in the Polygon Attribute Table (.PAT) and INFO expansion files. COORDINATE SYSTEM: WA State Plane South Zone (5626) (N. zone converted to S. zone) COORDINATE UNITS: Feet HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD27 PROJECTION NAME: Lambert Conformal Conic **** MAJOR CODES USED FOR SITECLASS DATA*****PFLG DATA: ITEM: PFLG.MAJ.SPEC TITLE: Potential major tree species for given soil FORMAT: INPUT OUTPUT DATA DECIMAL ARRAY ARRAY WIDTH WIDTH TYPE PLACES OCCUR. INDEX ------------------------------------------------- 3 3 C 0 0 0 CODE TABLE OR VALUE RANGE: SOIL.MAJ.SPEC.CODE DESCRIPTION: Potentially major tree species for a given soil type. The data carried by this item describes a major commercial tree species that could potentially grow on a specific soil type as identified in the Private Forest Land Grading program (PFLG). Non-tree codes are also included to map non-soil ground cover, e.g. water, gravel pits. ITEM: PFLG.SITE.INDEX TITLE: Mean site index calc.from trees on given soil FORMAT: INPUT OUTPUT DATA DECIMAL ARRAY ARRAY WIDTH WIDTH TYPE PLACES OCCUR. INDEX ------------------------------------------------- 3 3 I 0 0 0 CODE TABLE OR VALUE RANGE: 0-200 DESCRIPTION: Site index data collected for the Private Forest Land Grading soils program (PFLG). It is a designation of the quality of a forest site based on the height of of the tallest trees (dominant and co-dominant trees) in a stand at an arbitrarily chosen age. Usually the age chosen is 50 or 100 years. For example, if the average height attained by the tallest trees in a fully stocked stand at the age of 50 years is 75 feet, the site index is 75 feet. Westside site conditions are estimated by using an index age of 50 years, while eastside site conditions are estimated by using an index age of 100 years.--------------------------------------------------------------------SOILS-MAIN DATA: CODE TABLE NAME: SOIL.MAJ.SPEC.CODE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- CODE MAP/REPORT MAP CODE DESCRIPTION LABEL SYMB --------- ------------ ---- -------------------------------------------------- AF ALPINE FIR 0 Subalpine fir DF DOUGLAS FIR 0 Douglas fir GF GRAND FIR 0 Grand fir GP GRAVEL PIT 0 Gravel pit LP LODGEPOLE PN 0 Lodgepole pine MFP MAR FOR PROD 0 Marginal forest productivity NA N/A 0 Not applicable NC NON-COMMERC 0 Non-commercial ND NO DATA 0 No data PP PONDEROSA PN 0 Ponderosa pine RA RED ALDER 0 Red alder WAT WATER 0 Water WH W HEMLOCK 0 Western hemlock WL W LARCH 0 Western larch WP W WHITE PINE 0 Western white pine ITEM: SITE.INDEX.SIDE TITLE: Indicates 100 yr or 50 yr soil site index FORMAT: INPUT OUTPUT DATA DECIMAL ARRAY ARRAY WIDTH WIDTH TYPE PLACES OCCUR. INDEX ------------------------------------------------- 1 1 C 0 0 0 CODE FILE OR VALUE RANGE: SITE.INDEX.SIDE.CODE DESCRIPTION: Code used to indicate whether 100 year or 50 year site index tables are used to calculate the site index of a soil type. Note that some site indexes for "eastside" soils are based on the 50 year index table. SITE.INDEX.SIDE Indicates 100 yr or 50 yr soil site index CODE FILE SITE.INDEX.SIDE.CODE IS NOT USED BY OTHER ITEMS CODE MAP/REPORT MAP CODE DESCRIPTION LABEL SYMB --------- ------------ ---- -------------------------------------------------- E 100 YR SITE 0 Soil site index based on 100 year table W 50 YR SITE 0 Soil site index based on 50 year table------------------------------------------------------------------

This data set depicts federal lands having restrictions on access or activities -- that is, lands mangaed by the National Park Service, Defense Department, or Energy Department -- in western North America. The data set was created by reformatting and merging state- and province-based ownership data layers originally acquired from diverse sources (including state GAP programs, USBLM state offices and other sources). For each original dataset 3 additional fields, "Pub_Pvt", "CA_OWN", and "SOURCE" were added and populated based on the specific ownership information contained in the source data. The original coverages were then merged based on the "CA_OWN" field. Finally, NPS, DOD, and DOE lands were selected out of the ownership layer. All work was completed in AcMap 8.3. This product and all source data are available online from SAGEMAP: http://sagemap.wr.usgs.gov.

Click for MetadataClick for downloadService URL: https://gis.dnr.wa.gov/site3/rest/services/Public_Boundaries/WADNR_PUBLIC_Cadastre_OpenData/MapServer/2The Legal Description spatial layer covers the entire upland area of the State of Washington and consists of often overlapping areas that provide the structure and building blocks for the delineation of parcels of land, a parcel being briefly described as a portion of land identified for purpose of ownership, encumbrance, taxation or governmental administration. Legal Description areas are referred to in written legal descriptions used in the conveyance of parcels. In the Public Land Survey states, of which most non-colonial states including Washington are counted, the most widely recognized legal description area is called a Section. Normally there are 36 Sections in a Township, which is another legal description area. In Washington (and in Oregon) many early land claims took the form of Donation Land Claims, which are, like Sections, confined to being a part of a Township. Tracts, which are used by federal surveys to denote irregular areas where the claim to ownership is based on bona fide rights, and Protracted Blocks, which are a buffer between surveyed areas and areas of unsurveyed (protracted) Sections, are two additional subdivisions of Townships. Sections were not normally subdivided, except in theory, by the federal surveys. The subdivisions of Sections performed by county and local surveyors, using the federal design or schema for section subdivisions, are also part of the Legal Description layer. The fabric of Townships, Sections and their subdivisions, Donation Land Claims, Tracts and Protracted Blocks comprise what is known as the Public Land Survey System (PLSS). These PLSS surveys are referred to as Rectangular Surveys, due to their characteristic orientation to true meridian and to the normally square-like character of the areas encompassed. Other irregular federal surveys are included in the Legal Description layer. These include Mineral Surveys, Homestead Entry Surveys, Townsites and non-rectangular Indian Allotments. Under the authority of Counties and Cities many local subdivisions of the PLSS have been created and are included in the Legal Description Layer. Local subdivisions include the streets, blocks and lots that are common in urban and suburban environments.WA Legal Descriptions Metadata

For large areas, like Washington State, download as a file geodatabase. Large data sets like this one, for the State of Washington, may exceed the limits for downloading as shape files, excel files, or KML files. For areas less than a county, you may use the map to zoom to your area and download as shape file, excel or KML, if that format is desired.Information for SOILS data layer was derived from the Private Forest Land Grading system (PFLG) and subsequent soil surveys. PFLG was a five-year mapping program completed in 1980 for the purpose of forestland taxation. It was funded by the Washington State Department of Revenue. The Department of Natural Resources, Soil Conservation Service (now known as the Natural Resources Conservation Service or NRCS), USDA Forest Service and Washington State University conducted soil mapping cooperatively following national soil survey standards. Private lands having the potential of supporting commercial forests were surveyed along with interspersed small areas of State lands, Indian tribal lands, and federal lands. Because this was a cooperative soil survey project, agricultural and non-commercial forestlands were included within some survey areas. After the Department of Natural Resources originally developed its geographic information system, digitized soil map unit delineations and a few soil attributes were transferred to the system. Remaining PFLG soil attributes were later added and are now available through associated lookup tables. SCS (NRCS) soils data on agricultural lands also have been subsequently added to this data layer. The SOILS data layer includes approximately 1,100 townships with wholly or partially digitized soils data. State and private lands which have the potential of supporting commercial forest stands were surveyed. Some Indian tribal and federal lands were surveyed. Because this was a cooperative soils survey project, agricultural and non-commercial forestlands were also included within some survey areas. After the Department of Natural Resources originally developed its geographic information system, digitized soils delineations and a few soil attributes were transferred to the system. Remaining PFLG soil attributes were added at a later time and are now available through associated lookup tables. SCS soils data on agricultural lands also have subsequently been added to this data layer. This layer includes approximately 1, 100 townships with wholly or partially digitized soils data (2,101 townships would provide complete coverage of the state of Washington).-

The soils_sv resolves one to many relationships and as such is one of those special "DNR" spatial views ( ie. is implemented similar to a feature class). Column names may not match between SOILS_SV and the originating datasets. Use limitations

This Spatial View is available to Washingotn DNR users and those with access to the Washington State Uplands IMS site.

The following cautions only apply to one-to-many and many-to-many spatial views! Use these in the metadata only if the SV is one-to-many or many-to-many.

CAUTIONS: Area and Length Calculations: Use care when summarizing or totaling area or length calculations from spatial views with one-to-many or many-to-many relationships. One-to-many or many-to-many relationships between tabular and spatial data create multiple features in the same geometry. In other words, if there are two or more records in the table that correspond to the same feature (a single polygon, line or point), the spatial view will contain an identical copy of that feature's geometry for every corresponding record in the table. Area and length calculations should be performed carefully, to ensure they are not being exaggerated by including copies of the same feature's geometry.

Symbolizing Spatial Features:
Use care when symbolizing data in one-to-many or many-to-many spatial views. If there are multiple attributes tied to the same feature, symbolizing with a solid fill may mask other important features within the spatial view. This can be most commonly seen when symbolizing features based on a field with multiple table records.

Labeling Spatial Features: Spatial views with one-to-many or many-to-many relationships may present duplicate labels for those features with multiple table records. This is because there are multiple features in the same geometry, and each one receives a label.Soils Metadata

The WA RCO Funded Land Acquisitions layer supports the Public Lands Inventory required by:

The 2013-15 Capital Budget, Chapter 19, Laws of 2013, Section 3174, (ESSB 5035) has tasked the Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) to provide a centralized inventory of lands in Washington owned by federal, state and local governments, and by Native American tribes. This work is to be undertaken in collaboration with the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee (JLARC).

The proviso stipulates that the inventory must: • Be in a web-accessible format, including a Geographic Information System (GIS)-based interactive map that allows users to find out information about specific aspects of land ownership. The data must be standardized to allow summary information to be accessible. • Include the following information: o Ownership (federal; state, by state agency; local government; and tribal); o Ownership type (fee simple or easements); o Location; o Acreage; o Principal use of these lands (intended use at the time of acquisition and current use) including, but not limited to, developed recreation land, habitat and passive recreation land, and revenue-generation uses; and o Acquisition costs if acquired by state agencies over the last ten years, including acquisition funding sources.

In addition, RCO shall develop recommendations for standardization of acquisition and disposal recordkeeping on a biennial basis, including identifying a preferred process for centralizing acquisition data.

Key dates are January 1, 2014, when a status report on the inventory to the appropriate committees of the Legislature is due, and July 1, 2014, when the project must be complete and a final report is due.

The inventory is a key component for a three-part review of public lands that the Legislature tasked to JLARC in capital budget proviso 1001. The JLARC review is due December 1, 2014.