This mapping tool provides a representation of the general watershed boundaries for stream systems declared fully appropriated by the State Water Board. The boundaries were created by Division of Water Rights staff by delineating FASS critical reaches and consolidating HUC 12 sub-watersheds to form FASS Watershed boundaries. As such, the boundaries are in most cases conservative with respect to the associated stream system. However, users should check neighboring FASS Watersheds to ensure the stream system of interest is not restricted by other FASS listings. For more information regarding the Declaration of Fully Appropriated Stream Systems, visit the Division of Water Rights’ Fully Appropriated Streams webpage. How to Use the Interactive Mapping Tool: If it is your first time viewing the map, you will need to click the “OK” box on the splash screen and agree to the disclaimer before continuing. Navigate to your point of interest by either using the search bar or by zooming in on the map. You may enter a stream name, street address, or watershed ID in the search bar. Click on the map to identify the location of interest and one or more pop-up boxes may appear with information about the fully appropriated stream systems within the general watershed boundaries of the identified location. The information provided in the pop-up box may include: (a) stream name, (b) tributary, (c) season declared fully appropriated, (d) Board Decisions/Water Right Orders, and/or (e) court references/adjudications. You may toggle the FAS Streams reference layer on and off to find representative critical reaches associated with the FASS Watershed layer. Please note that this layer is for general reference purposes only and ultimately the critical reach listed in Appendix A of Water Rights Order 98-08 and Appendix A together with any associated footnotes controls. Note: A separate FAS Watershed boundary layer was created for the Bay-Delta Watershed. The Bay-Delta Watershed layer should be toggled on to check if the area of interest is fully appropriated under State Water Board Decision 1594.

Model My Watershed (MMW) is a free web application for modeling the influences of land use and best management practices on stormwater runoff and water quality. The public can access this tool at https://app.wikiwatershed.org/. One component of this tool is a function to define the model domain, or area of interest for analysis and modeling by interactively setting the outlet location and delineating the watershed draining to that location. This functionality has been developed using enhancements to the TauDEM hydrologic terrain analysis software ((http://hydrology.usu.edu/taudem) and includes a tool on the user interface and RESTFul Application Program Interface that accesses backend data generated from NHDPlus Version 2.1 gridded flow directions. The continental US was preprocessed into subwatersheds that include gridded flow directions and the polygon shapefile for the entire watershed draining to the subwatershed outlet. Thus when a point within the domain is input (clicked or entered to RESTFul API), the subwatershed that it falls in is first identified. It is then snapped to the stream by moving down to the first stream (NHDPlus medium resolution stream) encountered along the flow directions. Then the local watershed within the subwatershed is delineated based on subwatershed flow direction grid using an adaptation of the TauDEM gauge watershed function. This local subwatershed is then merged with shapefiles for any upstream watersheds to which it attaches. Small watersheds are delineated within a few seconds, with larger watersheds taking up to 40 s (entire Mississippi). The most time consuming step is the merging and generalization of shape information for display. The polygon that result from this process may be downloaded, and subject to size limitations also entered into the MMW analyze area function to summarize land use, hydrologic soils and other information of interest to hydrologic and water quality modeling within the delineated area. The resulting watershed polygon may also be entered into one of the stormwater or water quality models supported by MMW.

Presentation at 2018 AWRA Spring Specialty Conference: Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Water Resources X, Orlando, Florida, April 23-25, http://awra.org/meetings/Orlando2018/.

The state recognizes the importance of stream gaging information. A robust and reliable stream gage network can help state, federal, and local agencies manage water resources and conserve freshwater species more effectively for multiple benefits and help to avoid conflicts.Senate Bill No. 19 (SB 19) (Statutes of 2019, Chapter 361, Dodd) enacts Water Code section 144, which directs the Department of Water Resources (DWR) and the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) to develop a plan to address gaging information gaps through the deployment of a network of prioritized stream gages in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), Department of Conservation (DOC), the Central Valley Flood Protection Board (Flood Board), and interested stakeholders. The stream gaging plan will identify significant gaps in the stream gaging network to meet the wide variety of water management needs, which are increasingly important in the face of a changing climate. It is anticipated it will take two years to develop the plan.This web map displays some preliminary results from the Stream Gage Prioritization Analysis undertaken as part of the Senate Bill 19 Stream Gaging Plan.

Draft of the Geographies of the Watershed Improvement Program (WIP) Capacity Assessments for reference only. (This is a draft for resolution refinements of the watershed boundaries.) If you wish to be contacted when the final file is posted contact john.tangenberg @ sierranevada.ca.gov or use the dynamic service found at in your map document as it will automatically update. https://snc.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=6843fd5e35cf42e4a5c0c4fa548b1df8A WIP Capacity Assessment Geography is an aggregation of WIP watersheds More info on the WIP Watersheds can be found here:https://snc.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=f38517016ee54e7998ecade01f1a17eb

ArcGIS Map Packages and GIS Data for Gillreath-Brown, Nagaoka, and Wolverton (2019)

**When using the GIS data included in these map packages, please cite all of the following:

Gillreath-Brown, Andrew, Lisa Nagaoka, and Steve Wolverton. A Geospatial Method for Estimating Soil Moisture Variability in Prehistoric Agricultural Landscapes, 2019. PLoSONE 14(8):e0220457. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220457

Gillreath-Brown, Andrew, Lisa Nagaoka, and Steve Wolverton. ArcGIS Map Packages for: A Geospatial Method for Estimating Soil Moisture Variability in Prehistoric Agricultural Landscapes, Gillreath-Brown et al., 2019. Version 1. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2572018

OVERVIEW OF CONTENTS

This repository contains map packages for Gillreath-Brown, Nagaoka, and Wolverton (2019), as well as the raw digital elevation model (DEM) and soils data, of which the analyses was based on. The map packages contain all GIS data associated with the analyses described and presented in the publication. The map packages were created in ArcGIS 10.2.2; however, the packages will work in recent versions of ArcGIS. (Note: I was able to open the packages in ArcGIS 10.6.1, when tested on February 17, 2019). The primary files contained in this repository are:

Raw DEM and Soils data

Digital Elevation Model Data (Map services and data available from U.S. Geological Survey, National Geospatial Program, and can be downloaded from the National Elevation Dataset)

DEM_Individual_Tiles: Individual DEM tiles prior to being merged (1/3 arc second) from USGS National Elevation Dataset.

DEMs_Merged: DEMs were combined into one layer. Individual watersheds (i.e., Goodman, Coffey, and Crow Canyon) were clipped from this combined DEM.

Soils Data (Map services and data available from Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey, U.S. Department of Agriculture)

Animas-Dolores_Area_Soils: Small portion of the soil mapunits cover the northeastern corner of the Coffey Watershed (CW).

Cortez_Area_Soils: Soils for Montezuma County, encompasses all of Goodman (GW) and Crow Canyon (CCW) watersheds, and a large portion of the Coffey watershed (CW).

ArcGIS Map Packages

Goodman_Watershed_Full_SMPM_Analysis: Map Package contains the necessary files to rerun the SMPM analysis on the full Goodman Watershed (GW).

Goodman_Watershed_Mesa-Only_SMPM_Analysis: Map Package contains the necessary files to rerun the SMPM analysis on the mesa-only Goodman Watershed.

Crow_Canyon_Watershed_SMPM_Analysis: Map Package contains the necessary files to rerun the SMPM analysis on the Crow Canyon Watershed (CCW).

Coffey_Watershed_SMPM_Analysis: Map Package contains the necessary files to rerun the SMPM analysis on the Coffey Watershed (CW).

For additional information on contents of the map packages, please see see "Map Packages Descriptions" or open a map package in ArcGIS and go to "properties" or "map document properties."

LICENSES

Code: MIT year: 2019 Copyright holders: Andrew Gillreath-Brown, Lisa Nagaoka, and Steve Wolverton

CONTACT

Andrew Gillreath-Brown, PhD Candidate, RPA Department of Anthropology, Washington State University andrew.brown1234@gmail.com – Email andrewgillreathbrown.wordpress.com – Web

This resource contains data inputs and a Jupyter Notebook that is used to introduce Hydrologic Analysis using Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models (TauDEM) and Python. TauDEM is a free and open-source set of Digital Elevation Model (DEM) tools developed at Utah State University for the extraction and analysis of hydrologic information from topography. This resource is part of a HydroLearn Physical Hydrology learning module available at https://edx.hydrolearn.org/courses/course-v1:Utah_State_University+CEE6400+2019_Fall/about

In this activity, the student learns how to (1) derive hydrologically useful information from Digital Elevation Models (DEMs); (2) describe the sequence of steps involved in mapping stream networks, catchments, and watersheds; and (3) compute an approximate water balance for a watershed-based on publicly available data.

Please note that this exercise is designed for the Logan River watershed, which drains to USGS streamflow gauge 10109000 located just east of Logan, Utah. However, this Jupyter Notebook and the analysis can readily be applied to other locations of interest. If running the terrain analysis for other study sites, you need to prepare a DEM TIF file, an outlet shapefile for the area of interest, and the average annual streamflow and precipitation data. - There are several sources to obtain DEM data. In the U.S., the DEM data (with different spatial resolutions) can be obtained from the National Elevation Dataset available from the national map (http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/). Another DEM data source is the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (https://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/), an international research effort that obtained digital elevation models on a near-global scale (search for Digital Elevation at https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eros/science/usgs-eros-archive-products-overview?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects). - If not already available, you can generate the outlet shapefile by applying basic terrain analysis steps in geospatial information system models such as ArcGIS or QGIS. - You also need to obtain average annual streamflow and precipitation data for the watershed of interest to assess the annual water balance and calculate the runoff ratio in this exercise. In the U.S., the streamflow data can be obtained from the USGS NWIS website (https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis) and the precipitation from PRISM (https://prism.oregonstate.edu/normals/). Note that using other datasets may require preprocessing steps to make data ready to use for this exercise.

Description based on the metadata provided by the WMDs.NWFWMD: Watershed Delineation for NWFWMD. Custodian - Danny Layfield.The Northwest Florida Water Management District maintains the following GIS Data Dictionary as a public service, by granting the public and government agencies access to the Districts GIS data.Data is provided on an "as is" basis. In no event will the District or its staff be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential, or other damages, including loss of profit, arising out of the use of these data even if the District has been advised of the possibility of such damages.The spatial datasets are provided as zipped (.zip) ESRI shapefiles or geodatabases. The data are provided in UTM Zone 16N / NAD 83, map units metershttp://www.nwfwmd.state.fl.us/data-publications/gis-mapping/gis-data-directorySRWMD: Hydrography basin major. USGS24"SBAS" was orginally created by USGS as part of a cooperative effort between the USGS and DEP to create a statewide basin or watershed map. SRWMD has modified and added some watersheds because of local knowledge and needs of the District. A number of items have also been added to the coverage. Surfacewater watersheds are topographic land features which contain a unique hydrologic area of surface drainage. Suwannee River Water Management has choosen to call this a watershed map instead of a basin map as previously called. These spatial data sets provide SRWMD and other government agencies with a consolidated resource for watershed information at various levels of geographic extent. The data sets are intended to support watershed analysis, planning, permitting, regulatory, and other functions at SRWMD. They have been edited and modified by the District to reflect better information available at the regional level, and to better meet the specific needs of the GIS users at SRWMD. A guide to the Watershed coverage is available from SRWMD at md_lib/basins/items.doc. A spreadsheet that expains the attribution of both the polygon and arc attribute tables is also located at md_lib/basins/sbas_items.doc. Additional information about the original watershed maps created by USGS is available from the following sources: U.S. Geological Survey, 1994. Metadata for Hydrologic units maps of the Conterminous United States, 1:250,000-scale (nominal), ARC/INFO format. < http://water.usgs.gov/lookup/getspatial?/huc250k> U.S. Geological Survey, 1990. Land Use and Land Cover Digital Data from 1:250,000- and 1:100,000-Scale Maps. Data Users Guide 4, 33 pp, Reston, Virginia. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1996. Metadata for Hydrologic Unit Boundaries of the Conterminous United States, 1:250,000-scale (nominal), ARC/INFO Format, < http://www.epa.gov/nsdi/projects/catunit.htm>Note: This data was created by the Suwannee River Water Management District (SRWMD) to be used for planning purposes only. SRWMD shall not be held liable for any injury or damage caused by the use of data distributed as a public records request regardless of their use or application. SRWMD does not guarantee the accuracy, or suitability for any use of these data, and no warranty is expressed or implied. In no event will the SRWMD, its staff, or the contributing agencies be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential or other damages, including loss of profit, arising from the use of these data, even if the District has been advised of the possibility of such damages. Users of this data should therefore do so at their own risk. For more information please contact the SRWMD at 386-362-1001.http://www.srwmd.state.fl.us/index.aspx?NID=319SJRWMD: This coverage was originally created in September 2000 by GIS staff in the Resource Management Dept. It was created in Arc/Info, using the SJRWMD surface water drainage basins layer as a guideline. The swbasins were combined and shifted in places, to delineate ecology based areas for regulatory mitigation review. The changes came from a Board-appointed Advisory Committee and were approved by the Board and adopted by rule.The coverage corresponds to the basin boundaries found in the ERP Applicant's Handbook in Figure 12.2.8-1 and Appendix M. This is a special layer created specifically for regulatory purposes; it is distinct from the standard SJRWMD Surface Water Drainage Basins Layer. This layer mitig basin reg is to delineate ecologically based areas for regulatory mitigation review. This data reflects all Mitigation Basin changes approved by the Governing Board and effective as of November 5, 2008.For more information contact St. Johns River Water Management District 386-312-2314.http://floridaswater.com/gisdevelopment/docs/themes.htmlSWFWMD: This layer illustrates the extent of Comprehensive Watershed Management (CWM) watershed boundaries in the Southwest Florida Water Management District. This layer should be used for cartographic and resource management purposes.Watershed boundaries used in the Comprehensive Watershed Management (CWM) program. These boundaries were derived from the DBASINS coverage.These data were not collected under the supervision of a licensed Professional Surveyor and Mapper. Use of these data requires a general understanding of GIS.The data are being provided on an 'as is' basis. The District specifically disclaims any warranty, expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties or merchantability and fitness for a particular use. The entire risk as to quality and performance is with the user. In no event will the District or its staff be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential, or other damages, including loss of profit, arising out of the use of these data even if the District has been advised of the possibility of such damages. All data are intended for resource management use.For more information contact the Southwest Florida Water Management District (352) 796-7211. https://www.swfwmd.state.fl.us/data/gis/layer_library/category/physical_sparseSFWMD: Recreation of Figure 4.4.1 in Volume IV Basis of Review. 1989 Basins and Cumulative Impact Basins (fka Watersheds).For more information contact the South Florida Water Management District (561) 686-8800.http://www.sfwmd.gov/gisapps/sfwmdxwebdc/dataview.asp?

TauDEM suite of programs where developed to calculate hydrologic information from Digital Elevation Models (DEM). It includes DEM conditioning and correction, delineation, stream network development, distance to features (stream or divide), accumulation (downslope, decay limited, concentration limited, accumulation limited, reverse), avalanche runout zone, and others. For flat or closed basins, the typical approach of conditioning the DEM by pit-filling doesn't work well and those areas need to be masked.

Presentation at 2018 AWRA Spring Specialty Conference: Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Water Resources X, Orlando, Florida, April 23-25, http://awra.org/meetings/Orlando2018/

This dataset refers to topographic constraints and land use feedbacks affecting surface water dynamics in the Tapajós River Basin, Brazilian Amazon.

This map layer depicts the Sierra Nevada Conservancy's Watershed Improvement Program (WIP) Administrative Boundaries, which are known as Watershed Assessment Areas (AA). These boundaries are further delineated by California counties and the National Hydrography Dataset HUC 8.

Narragansett Bay, Little Narragansett Bay, and the Southwest Coastal Ponds are the three estuarine study areas under the purview of the Narragansett Bay Estuary Program. This dataset represents the 12-digit hydrologic units (HUC12) that drain, directly and indirectly, to the three estuaries. HUC12 drainage areas were sourced from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) which contains a nested, hierarchical system of hydrologic units. Hydrologic units define the boundaries of surface water drainage to a given set of outlet points or a dendritic stream network. The boundaries are determined by topographic, hydrologic, and other relevant landscape characteristics. Within the Little Narragansett Bay watershed, NBEP delineated the drainage area for the western portion of Little Narragansett Bay. This area, “Part of Southeast Coastal-Pawcatuck River to Eastern Point,” drains to a smaller outlet than any hydrologic unit available in the WBD. All coastal watershed boundaries were updated with NBEP’s estuarine coastline delineation (for details about NBEP’s coastline delineation, see metadata for BAYS_NBEP2019). This dataset is intended for use in general planning, GIS analysis, and mapping at watershed and subwatershed scales. For more information, please reference the 2017 State of Narragansett Bay & Its Watershed Technical Report (nbep.org).

For more information, see the Aquatic Significant Habitats Factsheet at https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=150855. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (CDFW) Areas of Conservation Emphasis (ACE) is a compilation and analysis of the best-available statewide spatial information in California on biodiversity, rarity and endemism, harvested species, significant habitats, connectivity and wildlife movement, climate vulnerability, climate refugia, and other relevant data (e.g., other conservation priorities such as those identified in the State Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP), stressors, land ownership). ACE addresses both terrestrial and aquatic data. The ACE model combines and analyzes terrestrial information in a 2.5 square mile hexagon grid and aquatic information at the HUC12 watershed level across the state to produce a series of maps for use in non-regulatory evaluation of conservation priorities in California. The model addresses as many of CDFWs statewide conservation and recreational mandates as feasible using high quality data sources. High value areas statewide and in each USDA Ecoregion were identified. The ACE maps and data can be viewed in the ACE online map viewer, or downloaded for use in ArcGIS. For more detailed information see https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/Analysis/ACE and https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=24326.

Polygons depicting the watershed analysis units for the SWRCB's Drought Water Rights Allocation Tool (DWRAT), which assesses water supply against water demand. Attributes include the total water demand, allocation, and shortage, if any, for the lower Russian River Watershed (downstream of the Dry Creek confluence).Additional information about the SWRCB's Russian River drought response can be found at https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drought/russian_river/For feedback about the map design, please email DWR@waterboards.ca.gov or call (916) 341-5300. For feedback about the underlying data or shortage determinations, please email RussianRiverDrought@waterboards.ca.gov or call (916) 341-5318.Field Descriptions:Field NameDescriptionData SourceData TypeareasqkmArea of the basin in square kilometersDWR staff analysisNumericareaacresArea of the basin in acresDWR staff analysisNumericGroupingIs the basin considered to be in the Upper Russian River or Lower Russian River?DWR staffTextBasin_IDUnique identifier for the DWRAT analysis unit (basin)DWR staffTextBasin_NumIdentifier associated with the Basin IDDWR staffNumericBasinRepeat of Basin_IDDWR staffTextnet_flowNet flow available in the basin as modeled by DWRAT, in acre-feetDWRAT ModelNumericaug_riparian_proportionsShared percentage of demand available in August for each riparian water right modeled in the basinDWR staff analysisNumericaug_rip_basin_allocationsModeled surface water supply available to water right, in acre-feet, for August 2021eWRIMS databaseNumericaug_rip_basin_demandSurface water demand for August, in acre-feet, based on previous reported water use amountsDWR staff analysisNumericaug_rip_basin_shortageWater shortage amount for August, in acre-feetDWR staff analysisNumericaug_rip_basin_shortage_%Water shortage for August, described as a percent of the demandDWRAT ModelNumericaug_app_basin_allocationsModeled surface water supply available to water right, in acre-feet, for August 2021DWRAT ModelNumericaug_app_basin_demandSurface water demand for August, in acre-feet, based on previous reported water use amountseWRIMS databaseNumericaug_app_basin_shortageWater shortage amount for August, in acre-feetDWR staff analysisNumericaug_app_basin_shortage_%Water shortage for August, described as a percent of the demandDWR staff analysisNumericsep_riparian_proportionsShared percentage of demand available in September for each riparian water right modeled in the basinDWRAT ModelNumericsep_rip_basin_allocationsModeled surface water supply available to water right, in acre-feet, for September 2021DWR staff analysisNumericsep_rip_basin_demandSurface water demand for September, in acre-feet, based on previous reported water use amountseWRIMS databaseNumericsep_rip_basin_shortageWater shortage amount for September, in acre-feetDWR staff analysisNumericsep_rip_basin_shortage_%Water shortage for September, described as a percent of the demandDWR staff analysisNumericsep_app_basin_allocationsModeled surface water supply available to water right, in acre-feet, for September 2021DWRAT ModelNumericsep_app_basin_demandSurface water demand for September, in acre-feet, based on previous reported water use amountseWRIMS databaseNumericsep_app_basin_shortageWater shortage amount for September, in acre-feetDWR staff analysisNumericsep_app_basin_shortage_%Water shortage for September, described as a percent of the demandDWR staff analysisNumeric