Saved datasets
Last updated
Download format
Usage rights
License from data provider
Please review the applicable license to make sure your contemplated use is permitted.
Topic
Free
Cost to access
Described as free to access or have a license that allows redistribution.
2 datasets found
  1. Webis-Editorial-Quality-18

    • webis.de
    Updated 2018
  2. Data from: Challenge or Empower: Revisiting Argumentation Quality in a News...

    • zenodo.org
    • figshare.com
    zip
    Updated Oct 30, 2018
  3. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
El Baff, Roxanne; Wachsmuth, Henning; Al-Khatib, Khalid; Stein, Benno (2018). Webis-Editorial-Quality-18 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1340629
Organization logoOrganization logo

Webis-Editorial-Quality-18

3 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated 2018
Dataset provided by
Paderborn Universityhttp://www.uni-paderborn.de/
Bauhaus-Universität Weimarhttp://www.uni-weimar.de/
The Web Technology & Information Systems Network
Authors
El Baff, Roxanne; Wachsmuth, Henning; Al-Khatib, Khalid; Stein, Benno
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

The Webis-Editorials-18 corpus comprises 1000 news editorials that are annotated in accordance with a new notion for argumentation quality. The notion regards whether an editorial brings readers of opposing beliefs closer together or rather increases the gap between them. In particular, we label each editorial in the corpus as challenging, reinforcing, or no-effect. To account for the political ideology of the target readers, each editorial is labelled by three liberals and three conservatives.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu