Facebook
TwitterTraffic analytics, rankings, and competitive metrics for definitions.net as of September 2025
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset is available on Brisbane City Council’s open data website – data.brisbane.qld.gov.au. The site provides additional features for viewing and interacting with the data and for downloading the data in various formats.
Monthly analytics reports for the Brisbane City Council website
Information regarding the sessions for Brisbane City Council website during the month including search terms used.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Monthly analytics reports for the Brisbane City Council website
Information regarding the sessions for Brisbane City Council website during the month including search terms used.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comparison of definitions of total visits, unique visitors, bounce rate, and session duration conceptually and for the two analytics platforms: Google Analytics and SimilarWeb.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://semrush.ebundletools.com/company/legal/terms-of-service/https://semrush.ebundletools.com/company/legal/terms-of-service/
definitions.net is ranked #23848 in US with 693.77K Traffic. Categories: Distance Learning, Online Services. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!
Facebook
TwitterOpen Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
This Website Statistics dataset has four resources showing usage of the Lincolnshire Open Data website. Web analytics terms used in each resource are defined in their accompanying Metadata file.
Website Usage Statistics: This document shows a statistical summary of usage of the Lincolnshire Open Data site for the latest calendar year.
Website Statistics Summary: This dataset shows a website statistics summary for the Lincolnshire Open Data site for the latest calendar year.
Webpage Statistics: This dataset shows statistics for individual Webpages on the Lincolnshire Open Data site by calendar year.
Dataset Statistics: This dataset shows cumulative totals for Datasets on the Lincolnshire Open Data site that have also been published on the national Open Data site Data.Gov.UK - see the Source link.
Note: Website and Webpage statistics (the first three resources above) show only UK users, and exclude API calls (automated requests for datasets). The Dataset Statistics are confined to users with javascript enabled, which excludes web crawlers and API calls.
These Website Statistics resources are updated annually in January by the Lincolnshire County Council Business Intelligence team. For any enquiries about the information contact opendata@lincolnshire.gov.uk.
Facebook
TwitterTraffic analytics, rankings, and competitive metrics for dictionary.com as of September 2025
Facebook
TwitterAuthor: Víctor Yeste. Universitat Politècnica de Valencia.The object of this study is the design of a cybermetric methodology whose objectives are to measure the success of the content published in online media and the possible prediction of the selected success variables.In this case, due to the need to integrate data from two separate areas, such as web publishing and the analysis of their shares and related topics on Twitter, has opted for programming as you access both the Google Analytics v4 reporting API and Twitter Standard API, always respecting the limits of these.The website analyzed is hellofriki.com. It is an online media whose primary intention is to solve the need for information on some topics that provide daily a vast number of news in the form of news, as well as the possibility of analysis, reports, interviews, and many other information formats. All these contents are under the scope of the sections of cinema, series, video games, literature, and comics.This dataset has contributed to the elaboration of the PhD Thesis:Yeste Moreno, VM. (2021). Diseño de una metodología cibermétrica de cálculo del éxito para la optimización de contenidos web [Tesis doctoral]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/176009Data have been obtained from each last-minute news article published online according to the indicators described in the doctoral thesis. All related data are stored in a database, divided into the following tables:tesis_followers: User ID list of media account followers.tesis_hometimeline: data from tweets posted by the media account sharing breaking news from the web.status_id: Tweet IDcreated_at: date of publicationtext: content of the tweetpath: URL extracted after processing the shortened URL in textpost_shared: Article ID in WordPress that is being sharedretweet_count: number of retweetsfavorite_count: number of favoritestesis_hometimeline_other: data from tweets posted by the media account that do not share breaking news from the web. Other typologies, automatic Facebook shares, custom tweets without link to an article, etc. With the same fields as tesis_hometimeline.tesis_posts: data of articles published by the web and processed for some analysis.stats_id: Analysis IDpost_id: Article ID in WordPresspost_date: article publication date in WordPresspost_title: title of the articlepath: URL of the article in the middle webtags: Tags ID or WordPress tags related to the articleuniquepageviews: unique page viewsentrancerate: input ratioavgtimeonpage: average visit timeexitrate: output ratiopageviewspersession: page views per sessionadsense_adunitsviewed: number of ads viewed by usersadsense_viewableimpressionpercent: ad display ratioadsense_ctr: ad click ratioadsense_ecpm: estimated ad revenue per 1000 page viewstesis_stats: data from a particular analysis, performed at each published breaking news item. Fields with statistical values can be computed from the data in the other tables, but total and average calculations are saved for faster and easier further processing.id: ID of the analysisphase: phase of the thesis in which analysis has been carried out (right now all are 1)time: "0" if at the time of publication, "1" if 14 days laterstart_date: date and time of measurement on the day of publicationend_date: date and time when the measurement is made 14 days latermain_post_id: ID of the published article to be analysedmain_post_theme: Main section of the published article to analyzesuperheroes_theme: "1" if about superheroes, "0" if nottrailer_theme: "1" if trailer, "0" if notname: empty field, possibility to add a custom name manuallynotes: empty field, possibility to add personalized notes manually, as if some tag has been removed manually for being considered too generic, despite the fact that the editor put itnum_articles: number of articles analysednum_articles_with_traffic: number of articles analysed with traffic (which will be taken into account for traffic analysis)num_articles_with_tw_data: number of articles with data from when they were shared on the media’s Twitter accountnum_terms: number of terms analyzeduniquepageviews_total: total page viewsuniquepageviews_mean: average page viewsentrancerate_mean: average input ratioavgtimeonpage_mean: average duration of visitsexitrate_mean: average output ratiopageviewspersession_mean: average page views per sessiontotal: total of ads viewedadsense_adunitsviewed_mean: average of ads viewedadsense_viewableimpressionpercent_mean: average ad display ratioadsense_ctr_mean: average ad click ratioadsense_ecpm_mean: estimated ad revenue per 1000 page viewsTotal: total incomeretweet_count_mean: average incomefavorite_count_total: total of favoritesfavorite_count_mean: average of favoritesterms_ini_num_tweets: total tweets on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_retweet_count_total: total retweets on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_retweet_count_mean: average retweets on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_favorite_count_total: total of favorites on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_favorite_count_mean: average of favorites on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_followers_talking_rate: ratio of followers of the media Twitter account who have recently published a tweet talking about the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_user_num_followers_mean: average followers of users who have spoken of the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_user_num_tweets_mean: average number of tweets published by users who spoke about the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_user_age_mean: average age in days of users who have spoken of the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_ur_inclusion_rate: URL inclusion ratio of tweets talking about terms on the day of publicationterms_end_num_tweets: total tweets on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_retweet_count_total: total retweets on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_retweet_count_mean: average retweets on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_favorite_count_total: total bookmarks on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_favorite_count_mean: average of favorites on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_followers_talking_rate: ratio of media Twitter account followers who have recently posted a tweet talking about the terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_user_num_followers_mean: average followers of users who have spoken of the terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_user_num_tweets_mean: average number of tweets published by users who have spoken about the terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_user_age_mean: the average age in days of users who have spoken of the terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_ur_inclusion_rate: URL inclusion ratio of tweets talking about terms 14 days after publication.tesis_terms: data of the terms (tags) related to the processed articles.stats_id: Analysis IDtime: "0" if at the time of publication, "1" if 14 days laterterm_id: Term ID (tag) in WordPressname: Name of the termslug: URL of the termnum_tweets: number of tweetsretweet_count_total: total retweetsretweet_count_mean: average retweetsfavorite_count_total: total of favoritesfavorite_count_mean: average of favoritesfollowers_talking_rate: ratio of followers of the media Twitter account who have recently published a tweet talking about the termuser_num_followers_mean: average followers of users who were talking about the termuser_num_tweets_mean: average number of tweets published by users who were talking about the termuser_age_mean: average age in days of users who were talking about the termurl_inclusion_rate: URL inclusion ratio
Facebook
TwitterU.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
Data Description: This data set provides all public datasets, links, documents and community created filters hosted on the City of Cincinnati's Open Data Portal.
Data Creation: This data set is maintained by the City of Cincinnati's Open Data host, Socrata.
Data Created By: Socrata
Refresh Frequency: Daily
Data Dictionary: A data dictionary providing definitions of columns and attributes is available as an attachment to this data set.
Processing: The City of Cincinnati is committed to providing the most granular and accurate data possible. In that pursuit the Office of Performance and Data Analytics facilitates standard processing to most raw data prior to publication. Processing includes but is not limited: address verification, geocoding, decoding attributes, and addition of administrative areas (i.e. Census, neighborhoods, police districts, etc.).
Data Usage: For directions on downloading and using open data please visit our How-to Guide: https://data.cincinnati-oh.gov/dataset/Open-Data-How-To-Guide/gdr9-g3ad
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Riga Data Science Club is a non-profit organisation to share ideas, experience and build machine learning projects together. Data Science community should known own data, so this is a dataset about ourselves: our website analytics, social media activity, slack statistics and even meetup transcriptions!
Dataset is split up in several folders by the context: * linkedin - company page visitor, follower and post stats * slack - messaging and member activity * typeform - new member responses * website - website visitors by country, language, device, operating system, screen resolution * youtube - meetup transcriptions
Let's make Riga Data Science Club better! We expect this data to bring lots of insights on how to improve.
"Know your c̶u̶s̶t̶o̶m̶e̶r̶ member" - Explore member interests by analysing sign-up survey (typeform) responses - Explore messaging patterns in Slack to understand how members are retained and when they are lost
Social media intelligence * Define LinkedIn posting strategy based on historical engagement data * Define target user profile based on LinkedIn page attendance data
Website * Define website localisation strategy based on data about visitor countries and languages * Define website responsive design strategy based on data about visitor devices, operating systems and screen resolutions
Have some fun * NLP analysis of meetup transcriptions: word frequencies, question answering, something else?
Facebook
TwitterU.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
Data Description: This data set provides all usage information for all web pages on the City of Cincinnati's interactive dashboard portal, CincyInsights.
Data Creation: This data set is maintained by the City of Cincinnati's Open Data host, Socrata.
Data Created By: Socrata
Refresh Frequency: Daily
Data Dictionary: A data dictionary providing definitions of columns and attributes is available as an attachment to this data set.
Processing: The City of Cincinnati is committed to providing the most granular and accurate data possible. In that pursuit the Office of Performance and Data Analytics facilitates standard processing to most raw data prior to publication. Processing includes but is not limited: address verification, geocoding, decoding attributes, and addition of administrative areas (i.e. Census, neighborhoods, police districts, etc.).
Data Usage: For directions on downloading and using open data please visit our How-to Guide: https://data.cincinnati-oh.gov/dataset/Open-Data-How-To-Guide/gdr9-g3ad
Facebook
TwitterOpen Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
This Website Statistics dataset has three resources showing usage of the Lincolnshire Open Data website. Web analytics terms used in each resource are defined in their accompanying Metadata file. Please Note: due to a change in Analytics platform and accompanying metrics, the current files do not contain a full years data. The files will be updated again in January 2025 with 2024-2025 data. The previous dataset containing Web Analytics has been archived and can be found in the following link; https://lincolnshire.ckan.io/dataset/website-statistics-archived Website Usage Statistics: This document shows a statistical summary of usage of the Lincolnshire Open Data site for the latest calendar year. Website Statistics Summary: This dataset shows a website statistics summary for the Lincolnshire Open Data site for the latest calendar year. Webpage Statistics: This dataset shows statistics for individual Webpages on the Lincolnshire Open Data site by calendar year. Note: The resources above exclude API calls (automated requests for datasets). These Website Statistics resources are updated annually in February by the Lincolnshire County Council Open Data team.
Facebook
TwitterOpen Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
This Website Statistics dataset has three resources showing usage of the Lincolnshire Open Data website. Web analytics terms used in each resource are defined in their accompanying Metadata file. Please Note: due to a change in Analytics platform and accompanying metrics, the current files do not contain a full years data. The files will be updated again in January 2025 with 2024-2025 data. The previous dataset containing Web Analytics has been archived and can be found in the following link; https://lincolnshire.ckan.io/dataset/website-statistics-archived Website Usage Statistics: This document shows a statistical summary of usage of the Lincolnshire Open Data site for the latest calendar year. Website Statistics Summary: This dataset shows a website statistics summary for the Lincolnshire Open Data site for the latest calendar year. Webpage Statistics: This dataset shows statistics for individual Webpages on the Lincolnshire Open Data site by calendar year. Note: The resources above exclude API calls (automated requests for datasets). These Website Statistics resources are updated annually in February by the Lincolnshire County Council Open Data team.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://semrush.ebundletools.com/company/legal/terms-of-service/https://semrush.ebundletools.com/company/legal/terms-of-service/
dictionary.com is ranked #884 in US with 18.9M Traffic. Categories: Distance Learning, Online Services. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!
Facebook
TwitterOpen Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
Note: This dataset has been archived and is no longer being updated due to a change in analytics platform. You can find the new dataset relating to Website Statistics in the following link; https://lincolnshire.ckan.io/dataset/website-statistics This Website Statistics dataset has three resources showing usage of the Lincolnshire Open Data website. Web analytics terms used in each resource are defined in their accompanying Metadata file. Website Usage Statistics: This document shows a statistical summary of usage of the Lincolnshire Open Data site for the latest calendar year. Website Statistics Summary: This dataset shows a website statistics summary for the Lincolnshire Open Data site for the latest calendar year. Webpage Statistics: This dataset shows statistics for individual Webpages on the Lincolnshire Open Data site by calendar year. Note: The resources above show only UK users, and exclude API calls (automated requests for datasets). For further information, please contact the Lincolnshire County Council Open Data team.
Facebook
Twitter** Note: This dataset has been archived and is no longer being updated due to a change in analytics platform. You can find the new dataset relating to Website Statistics in the following link; https://lincolnshire.ckan.io/dataset/website-statistics ** This Website Statistics dataset has three resources showing usage of the Lincolnshire Open Data website. Web analytics terms used in each resource are defined in their accompanying Metadata file. - Website Usage Statistics: This document shows a statistical summary of usage of the Lincolnshire Open Data site for the latest calendar year. - Website Statistics Summary: This dataset shows a website statistics summary for the Lincolnshire Open Data site for the latest calendar year. - Webpage Statistics: This dataset shows statistics for individual Webpages on the Lincolnshire Open Data site by calendar year. Note: The resources above show only UK users, and exclude API calls (automated requests for datasets). For further information, please contact the Lincolnshire County Council Open Data team.
Facebook
TwitterThe Catalog Search Terms dataset captures the words and phrases input by users in search bars that look through the data catalog for relevant information. Data can also be categorized by user segments.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://semrush.ebundletools.com/company/legal/terms-of-service/https://semrush.ebundletools.com/company/legal/terms-of-service/
dictionary.cambridge.org is ranked #500 in US with 70.15M Traffic. Categories: . Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!
Facebook
TwitterThis asset is a filter (derived view of a dataset) based on the system dataset, 'Site Analytics: Catalog Search Terms' which is automatically generated by the City of Austin Open Data Portal (data.austintexas.gov). It provides data on the words and phrases entered by site users of in search bars that look through the data catalog for relevant information. Catalog searches using the Discovery API are not included.
Each row in the dataset indicates the number of catalog searches made using the search term from the specified user segment during the noted hour.
Data are segmented into the following user types: • site member: users who have logged in and have been granted a role on the domain • community user: users who have logged in but do not have a role on the domain • anonymous: users who have not logged in to the domain
Data are updated by a system process at least once a day, if there is new data to record.
Data provided by: Tyler Technologies Creation date of data source: January 31, 2020
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
Competitive Analysis of Industry Rivals The market for competitive analysis is expected to grow significantly over the forecast period, driven by increasing need for businesses to understand their competitive landscape. Key players in the market include BuiltWith, WooRank, SEMrush, Google, SpyFu, Owletter, SimilarWeb, Moz, SunTec Data, and TrendSource. These companies offer a range of services to help businesses track their competitors' online performance, including website traffic, social media engagement, and search engine rankings. Some of the key trends driving the growth of the market include the increasing adoption of digital marketing by businesses, the growing importance of social media, and the increasing availability of data and analytics tools. The market is segmented by type, application, and region. In terms of type, the market is divided into product analysis, traffic analytics, sales analytics, and others. In terms of application, the market is divided into SMEs and large enterprises. In terms of region, the market is divided into North America, South America, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia Pacific. The North American region is expected to dominate the market during the forecast period, due to the presence of a large number of established players in the market. The Asia Pacific region is expected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period, due to the increasing adoption of digital marketing by businesses in the region. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the industry rivals, encompassing their concentration, product insights, regional trends, and key industry developments.
Facebook
TwitterTraffic analytics, rankings, and competitive metrics for definitions.net as of September 2025