NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

A complete list of live websites using the Participants Database technology, compiled through global website indexing conducted by WebTechSurvey.

The dataset is comprised of: 1)VOC concentrations of soil gas and indoor air samples collected over the site; 2) the pressure readings used to monitor the pressure differential between subslab and indoor air. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Lutes, C., V. Boyd, G. Buckley, L. Levy, K. Bronstein, J. Zimmerman, A. Williams, and B. Schumacher. Impact of Hurricanes, Tropical Storms, and Coastal Extratropical Storms on Indoor Air VOC Concentrations. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 44(2): 101-117, (2024).

The global market for academic research databases is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach $388.2 million in 2025. While the exact Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) is not provided, considering the ongoing digitalization of research and education, a conservative estimate would place the CAGR in the range of 7-9% for the forecast period (2025-2033). This growth is fueled by several key drivers. The increasing reliance on digital resources by students, teachers, and researchers across all academic disciplines is a significant factor. Furthermore, the expanding volume of scholarly publications and the need for efficient access and management of research data are propelling market expansion. The rising adoption of cloud-based solutions and the development of sophisticated search and analytical tools within these databases are also contributing to this growth trajectory. The market segmentation highlights the diverse user base, with students, teachers, and experts representing major segments, each with varying needs and subscription models (charge-based or free access). The competitive landscape is characterized by established players like Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed, alongside other significant contributors like ERIC, ProQuest, and IEEE Xplore, indicating a market with both established dominance and emerging players vying for market share. Geographic distribution shows a strong presence across North America and Europe, but with significant growth potential in Asia-Pacific regions. The market's future trajectory will likely be shaped by several trends. The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) for enhanced search and data analysis capabilities will be a major factor. The ongoing development of open-access initiatives and the expansion of free databases will influence market dynamics, potentially impacting the revenue streams of subscription-based services. However, challenges such as data security concerns, the need for continuous content updates, and the varying levels of digital literacy across different user groups may act as restraints on market growth. Nevertheless, the overall outlook for the academic research database market remains positive, driven by the continued expansion of scholarly research and the growing demand for efficient and reliable access to research information globally.

Database of Service Provider Names, Websites, Mission, Location by Country, and Service Type who participated in the SelectUSA 2017 and 2018 Investment Summits

The dataset is comprised of VOC concentrations of soil gas, outdoor and indoor air samples collected at the site for the duration of this study. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Zimmerman, J., A. Williams, B. Schumacher, C. Lutes, L. Levy, G. Buckley, V. Boyd, C. Holton, T. McAlary, and R. Truesdale. The Representativeness of Subslab Soil Gas Collection as Effected by Probe Construction and Sampling Methods. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 44(3): 106-121, (2024).

Explore the historical Whois records related to web-databases.net (Domain). Get insights into ownership history and changes over time.

Abstract Public databases are essential to the development of multi-omics resources. The amount of data created by biological technologies needs a systematic and organized form of storage, that can quickly be accessed, and managed. This is the objective of a biological database. Here, we present an overview of human databases with web applications. The databases and tools allow the search of biological sequences, genes and genomes, gene expression patterns, epigenetic variation, protein-protein interactions, variant frequency, regulatory elements, and comparative analysis between human and model organisms. Our goal is to provide an opportunity for exploring large datasets and analyzing the data for users with little or no programming skills. Public user-friendly web-based databases facilitate data mining and the search for information applicable to healthcare professionals. Besides, biological databases are essential to improve biomedical search sensitivity and efficiency and merge multiple datasets needed to share data and build global initiatives for the diagnosis, prognosis, and discovery of new treatments for genetic diseases. To show the databases at work, we present a a case study using ACE2 as example of a gene to be investigated. The analysis and the complete list of databases is available in the following website .

This research focused the analyses on a specific the region, the United States as a case study, to understand the challenges of adopting robotics in construction and the associated lessons learned. The goal of this study is to assemble, present specific and easily identifiable barriers that are documented in scientific literature, which in turn will support the construction profession and advance the adoption of robotics and its associated training and knowledge precisely for the U.S construction industry.

The organizations that contribute to the longevity of 67 long-lived molecular biology databases published in Nucleic Acids Research (NAR) between 1991-2016 were identified to address two research questions 1) which organizations fund these databases? and 2) which organizations maintain these databases? Funders were determined by examining funding acknowledgements in each database's most recent NAR Database Issue update article published (prior to 2017) and organizations operating the databases were determine through review of database websites.

United States agricultural researchers have many options for making their data available online. This dataset aggregates the primary sources of ag-related data and determines where researchers are likely to deposit their agricultural data. These data serve as both a current landscape analysis and also as a baseline for future studies of ag research data. Purpose As sources of agricultural data become more numerous and disparate, and collaboration and open data become more expected if not required, this research provides a landscape inventory of online sources of open agricultural data. An inventory of current agricultural data sharing options will help assess how the Ag Data Commons, a platform for USDA-funded data cataloging and publication, can best support data-intensive and multi-disciplinary research. It will also help agricultural librarians assist their researchers in data management and publication. The goals of this study were to establish where agricultural researchers in the United States-- land grant and USDA researchers, primarily ARS, NRCS, USFS and other agencies -- currently publish their data, including general research data repositories, _domain-specific databases, and the top journals compare how much data is in institutional vs. _domain-specific vs. federal platforms determine which repositories are recommended by top journals that require or recommend the publication of supporting data ascertain where researchers not affiliated with funding or initiatives possessing a designated open data repository can publish data Approach The National Agricultural Library team focused on Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and United States Forest Service (USFS) style research data, rather than ag economics, statistics, and social sciences data. To find _domain-specific, general, institutional, and federal agency repositories and databases that are open to US research submissions and have some amount of ag data, resources including re3data, libguides, and ARS lists were analysed. Primarily environmental or public health databases were not included, but places where ag grantees would publish data were considered. Search methods We first compiled a list of known _domain specific USDA / ARS datasets / databases that are represented in the Ag Data Commons, including ARS Image Gallery, ARS Nutrition Databases (sub-components), SoyBase, PeanutBase, National Fungus Collection, i5K Workspace @ NAL, and GRIN. We then searched using search engines such as Bing and Google for non-USDA / federal ag databases, using Boolean variations of “agricultural data” /“ag data” / “scientific data” + NOT + USDA (to filter out the federal / USDA results). Most of these results were _domain specific, though some contained a mix of data subjects. We then used search engines such as Bing and Google to find top agricultural university repositories using variations of “agriculture”, “ag data” and “university” to find schools with agriculture programs. Using that list of universities, we searched each university web site to see if their institution had a repository for their unique, independent research data if not apparent in the initial web browser search. We found both ag specific university repositories and general university repositories that housed a portion of agricultural data. Ag specific university repositories are included in the list of _domain-specific repositories. Results included Columbia University – International Research Institute for Climate and Society, UC Davis – Cover Crops Database, etc. If a general university repository existed, we determined whether that repository could filter to include only data results after our chosen ag search terms were applied. General university databases that contain ag data included Colorado State University Digital Collections, University of Michigan ICPSR (Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research), and University of Minnesota DRUM (Digital Repository of the University of Minnesota). We then split out NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) repositories. Next we searched the internet for open general data repositories using a variety of search engines, and repositories containing a mix of data, journals, books, and other types of records were tested to determine whether that repository could filter for data results after search terms were applied. General subject data repositories include Figshare, Open Science Framework, PANGEA, Protein Data Bank, and Zenodo. Finally, we compared scholarly journal suggestions for data repositories against our list to fill in any missing repositories that might contain agricultural data. Extensive lists of journals were compiled, in which USDA published in 2012 and 2016, combining search results in ARIS, Scopus, and the Forest Service's TreeSearch, plus the USDA web sites Economic Research Service (ERS), National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Natural Resources and Conservation Service (NRCS), Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), Rural Development (RD), and Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS). The top 50 journals' author instructions were consulted to see if they (a) ask or require submitters to provide supplemental data, or (b) require submitters to submit data to open repositories. Data are provided for Journals based on a 2012 and 2016 study of where USDA employees publish their research studies, ranked by number of articles, including 2015/2016 Impact Factor, Author guidelines, Supplemental Data?, Supplemental Data reviewed?, Open Data (Supplemental or in Repository) Required? and Recommended data repositories, as provided in the online author guidelines for each the top 50 journals. Evaluation We ran a series of searches on all resulting general subject databases with the designated search terms. From the results, we noted the total number of datasets in the repository, type of resource searched (datasets, data, images, components, etc.), percentage of the total database that each term comprised, any dataset with a search term that comprised at least 1% and 5% of the total collection, and any search term that returned greater than 100 and greater than 500 results. We compared _domain-specific databases and repositories based on parent organization, type of institution, and whether data submissions were dependent on conditions such as funding or affiliation of some kind. Results A summary of the major findings from our data review: Over half of the top 50 ag-related journals from our profile require or encourage open data for their published authors. There are few general repositories that are both large AND contain a significant portion of ag data in their collection. GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility), ICPSR, and ORNL DAAC were among those that had over 500 datasets returned with at least one ag search term and had that result comprise at least 5% of the total collection. Not even one quarter of the _domain-specific repositories and datasets reviewed allow open submission by any researcher regardless of funding or affiliation. See included README file for descriptions of each individual data file in this dataset. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Journals. File Name: Journals.csvResource Title: Journals - Recommended repositories. File Name: Repos_from_journals.csvResource Title: TDWG presentation. File Name: TDWG_Presentation.pptxResource Title: Domain Specific ag data sources. File Name: domain_specific_ag_databases.csvResource Title: Data Dictionary for Ag Data Repository Inventory. File Name: Ag_Data_Repo_DD.csvResource Title: General repositories containing ag data. File Name: general_repos_1.csvResource Title: README and file inventory. File Name: README_InventoryPublicDBandREepAgData.txt

The global market for academic research databases is experiencing robust growth, projected to be valued at $259.3 million in 2025 and exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 5.9% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is driven by several key factors. The increasing digitization of scholarly publications and the growing reliance on online research resources across universities, research institutions, and corporations are significant contributors. Furthermore, the expanding availability of open-access journals and repositories, while presenting challenges to some established players, ultimately broadens the overall market by increasing accessibility and usage. The rising demand for advanced search functionalities, data analytics tools integrated within these databases, and robust citation management systems also fuels market growth. Different subscription models, including free and charge-based access, cater to diverse user needs – students, teachers, experts, and others – further driving market segmentation and overall growth. The North American market currently holds a significant share due to the presence of major research institutions and established database providers. However, increasing research activities in Asia-Pacific and other regions are poised to fuel future growth, with a potentially significant increase in the market share in these regions over the forecast period. Competition remains intense among established players like Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed, alongside newer entrants. Differentiation through superior indexing, advanced search capabilities, and specialized content areas is vital for success in this competitive landscape. The market segmentation by application (Student, Teacher, Expert, Others) and type of access (Charge, Free) provides valuable insights into the diverse user base and revenue streams. The "charge" segment is expected to maintain a significant market share, driven by the demand for comprehensive and specialized research content requiring paid subscriptions. However, the "free" segment, fueled by the increasing availability of open-access resources, will also show considerable growth, broadening accessibility and market penetration. Regional growth patterns will likely reflect existing research infrastructure and investments in higher education and research across different geographic areas. Continued technological advancements and innovation in areas such as artificial intelligence-powered search and data analysis will further shape the market landscape, leading to more sophisticated and efficient research tools in the years to come.

A technology users databse is a collection of contact information of people who use various types of technology products or services, such as software, hardware, cloud computing, AI, etc.

A technology users email list can help you to:

• Identify and target your ideal audience based on their technology usage and preferences
• Segment and personalize your marketing campaigns according to different criteria, such as industry, location, company size, job title, etc.
• Increase your brand awareness and credibility among technology users
• Generate more leads and conversions for your products or services
• Build long-term relationships and loyalty with your existing customers
• Stay ahead of the competition and market trends

ChIP-Atlas is the database and its web interface to provide the result of analysis processed from the entire ChIP-Seq data archived in Sequence Read Archive. We have curated metadata described by original data submitter to enable further data analysis. See details here: https://github.com/inutano/chip-atlas/wiki

OpenWeb Ninja's Google Images Data (Google SERP Data) API provides real-time image search capabilities for images sourced from all public sources on the web.

The API enables you to search and access more than 100 billion images from across the web including advanced filtering capabilities as supported by Google Advanced Image Search. The API provides Google Images Data (Google SERP Data) including details such as image URL, title, size information, thumbnail, source information, and more data points. The API supports advanced filtering and options such as file type, image color, usage rights, creation time, and more. In addition, any Advanced Google Search operators can be used with the API.

OpenWeb Ninja's Google Images Data & Google SERP Data API common use cases:

• Creative Media Production: Enhance digital content with a vast array of real-time images, ensuring engaging and brand-aligned visuals for blogs, social media, and advertising.

• AI Model Enhancement: Train and refine AI models with diverse, annotated images, improving object recognition and image classification accuracy.

• Trend Analysis: Identify emerging market trends and consumer preferences through real-time visual data, enabling proactive business decisions.

• Innovative Product Design: Inspire product innovation by exploring current design trends and competitor products, ensuring market-relevant offerings.

• Advanced Search Optimization: Improve search engines and applications with enriched image datasets, providing users with accurate, relevant, and visually appealing search results.

OpenWeb Ninja's Annotated Imagery Data & Google SERP Data Stats & Capabilities:

• 100B+ Images: Access an extensive database of over 100 billion images.

• Images Data from all Public Sources (Google SERP Data): Benefit from a comprehensive aggregation of image data from various public websites, ensuring a wide range of sources and perspectives.

• Extensive Search and Filtering Capabilities: Utilize advanced search operators and filters to refine image searches by file type, color, usage rights, creation time, and more, making it easy to find exactly what you need.

• Rich Data Points: Each image comes with more than 10 data points, including URL, title (annotation), size information, thumbnail, and source information, providing a detailed context for each image.

THIS RESOURCE IS NO LONGER IN SERVICE, documented on June 24, 2013. Database and Browser containing quantitative information on all the metal-containing sites available from structures in the PDB distribution. This database contains geometrical and molecular information that allows the classification and search of particular combinations of site characteristics, and answer questions such as: How many mononuclear zinc-containing sites are five coordinate with X-ray resolution better than 1.8 Angstroms?, and then be able to visualize and manipulate the matching sites. The database also includes enough information to answer questions involving type and number of ligands (e.g. "at least 2 His"), and include distance cutoff criteria (e.g. a metal-ligand distance no more than 3.0 Angstroms and no less than 2.2 Angstroms). This database is being developed as part of a project whose ultimate goal is metalloprotein design, allowing the interactive visualization of geometrical and functional information garnered from the MDB. The database is created by automatic recognition and extraction of metal-binding sites from metal-containing proteins. Quantitative information is extracted and organized into a searchable form, by iterating through all the entries in the latest PDB release (at the moment: September 2001). This is a comprehensive quantitative database, which exists in SQL format and contains information on about 5,500 proteins.

This layer of data locates the right-of-way of certain sites contained in the Sites & Organisations database. It covers the entire territory of Rennes Métropole. It has several representations available in the formats listed below to display equipment in the form of a right-of-way or to highlight certain equipment according to its theme. Thus, it is possible to display: — the names of the equipment based on the names appearing on the town plans of the municipalities of Rennes Métropole — the grip of all the equipment of the layer in the form of a white cover — the right of way according to the themes of Sites & Organisations (sport, health, culture, education,...) The id_site attribute makes it possible to attach these right-of-way to the sites of the Sites & Organisations database, a reference base for equipment on Rennes Métropole. For more information on the sites, see the following metadata: https://public.sig.rennesmetropole.fr/geonetwork/srv/fre/catalog.search#/metadata/56ace7a5-e6d0-4e1e-8685-e18d98ee151d

Gain exclusive access to verified Shopify store owners with our premium Shopify Users Email List. This database includes essential data fields such as Store Name, Website, Contact Name, Email Address, Phone Number, Physical Address, Revenue Size, Employee Size, and more on demand. Leverage real-time, accurate data to enhance your marketing efforts and connect with high-value Shopify merchants. Whether you're targeting small businesses or enterprise-level Shopify stores, our database ensures precision and reliability for optimized lead generation and outreach strategies. Key Highlights: ✅ 3.9M+ Shopify Stores ✅ Direct Contact Info of Shopify Store Owners ✅ 40+ Data Points ✅ Lifetime Access ✅ 10+ Data Segmentations ✅ FREE Sample Data

This book is the result of teaching the laboratory component of an introductory course in Database Systems in the Department of Computer Science & Software Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal.. The intent of this part of the course was to have the students create a practical web-based application wherein the database forms the dynamic component of a real life application using a web browser as the user interface.

It was decided to use all open source software, namely, Apache web server, PHP, JavaScript and HTML, and also the open source database which started as MySQL and has since migrated to MariaDB.

The examples given in this book have been run successfully both using MySQL on a Windows platform and MariaDB on a Linux platform without any changes. However, the code may need to be updated as the underlying software systems evolve with time, as functions are deprecated and replaced by others. Hence the user is responsible for making any required changes to any code given in this book.

The readers are also warned of the changing privacy and data usage policy of most web sites. They should be aware that most web sites collect and mine user’s data for private profit.

The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of many students in the introductory database course over the years whose needs and the involvement of one of the authors in the early days of the web prompted the start of this project in the late part of the 20th century. This was the era of dot com bubble

The global database market, currently valued at $131.67 billion (2025), is experiencing robust growth, projected to expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 14.21% from 2025 to 2033. This surge is driven by several key factors. The increasing adoption of cloud-based solutions offers scalability and cost-effectiveness, fueling market expansion. Furthermore, the burgeoning demand for real-time data analytics across diverse sectors, including BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance), retail & e-commerce, and healthcare, is significantly boosting database market growth. The rise of big data and the need for robust data management solutions to handle massive datasets are other significant contributors. While on-premises deployments still hold a significant market share, particularly among large enterprises with stringent security requirements, the cloud segment is projected to witness the highest growth rate over the forecast period. The market is segmented by deployment (cloud, on-premises), enterprise size (SMEs, large enterprises), and end-user vertical (BFSI, retail & e-commerce, logistics & transportation, media & entertainment, healthcare, IT & telecom, others). Competition is intense, with established players like MongoDB, MarkLogic, Redis Labs, and Teradata alongside tech giants such as Microsoft, Amazon, and Google vying for market share through innovation and strategic partnerships. The competitive landscape is characterized by both established vendors and new entrants, leading to continuous innovation in database technologies. The market is witnessing a shift towards NoSQL databases, driven by the need to handle unstructured data and the increasing popularity of cloud-native applications. However, challenges such as data security concerns, the complexity of managing distributed database systems, and the need for skilled professionals to manage and maintain these systems pose potential restraints. The market's growth trajectory is largely positive, with continued expansion anticipated across all key segments and regions. North America and Europe are currently the dominant markets, but rapid growth is expected in Asia-Pacific, driven by increased digitalization and technological advancements in developing economies such as India and China. This comprehensive report provides an in-depth analysis of the global database market, encompassing historical data (2019-2024), current estimates (2025), and future forecasts (2025-2033). It examines key market segments, growth drivers, challenges, and emerging trends, offering valuable insights for businesses, investors, and stakeholders seeking to navigate this dynamic landscape. The study period covers the significant evolution of database technologies, from traditional relational databases to the rise of NoSQL and cloud-based solutions. The report utilizes a robust methodology and extensive primary and secondary research to provide accurate and actionable market intelligence. Keywords include: database market size, database market share, cloud database, NoSQL database, relational database, database management system (DBMS), database market trends, database market growth, database technology. Recent developments include: January 2024: Microsoft and Oracle recently announced the general availability of Oracle Database@Azure, allowing Azure customers to procure, deploy, and use Oracle Database@Azure with the Azure portal and APIs.November 2023: VMware, Inc. and Google Cloud announced an expanded partnership to deliver Google Cloud’s AlloyDB Omni database on VMware Cloud Foundation, starting with on-premises private clouds.. Key drivers for this market are: Increasing Penetration Of Trends Like Big Data And IoT, Increase In The Volume Of Data Generated And Shift Of Enterprise Operations. Potential restraints include: Increasing Penetration Of Trends Like Big Data And IoT, Increase In The Volume Of Data Generated And Shift Of Enterprise Operations. Notable trends are: Retail and E-commerce to Hold Significant Share.