A complete list of live websites using the Participants Database technology, compiled through global website indexing conducted by WebTechSurvey.

365 Data Science Database

365 Data Science is a website that provides online courses and resources for learning data science, machine learning, and data analysis.

It is common for websites that offer online courses to have **databases **to store information about their courses, students, and progress. It is also possible that they use databases for storing and organizing the data used in their courses and examples.

If you're looking for specific information about the database used by 365 Data Science, I recommend reaching out to them directly through their Website or support channels.

A complete list of live websites using the Advanced Database Cleaner technology, compiled through global website indexing conducted by WebTechSurvey.

NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

The global academic research database market is booming, projected to hit $388.2 million in 2025, with a robust CAGR driving growth. This in-depth analysis explores market size, key players (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed), and future trends shaping this vital sector for researchers and educators.

This research focused the analyses on a specific the region, the United States as a case study, to understand the challenges of adopting robotics in construction and the associated lessons learned. The goal of this study is to assemble, present specific and easily identifiable barriers that are documented in scientific literature, which in turn will support the construction profession and advance the adoption of robotics and its associated training and knowledge precisely for the U.S construction industry.

The global database market is booming, projected to reach [estimated 2033 market size in billions] by 2033, growing at a CAGR of 14.21%. This report analyzes market drivers, trends, restraints, and key players like MongoDB, Amazon, and Microsoft across cloud, on-premises, and various industry verticals. Discover insights into market segmentation and regional growth. Recent developments include: January 2024: Microsoft and Oracle recently announced the general availability of Oracle Database@Azure, allowing Azure customers to procure, deploy, and use Oracle Database@Azure with the Azure portal and APIs.November 2023: VMware, Inc. and Google Cloud announced an expanded partnership to deliver Google Cloud’s AlloyDB Omni database on VMware Cloud Foundation, starting with on-premises private clouds.. Key drivers for this market are: Increasing Penetration Of Trends Like Big Data And IoT, Increase In The Volume Of Data Generated And Shift Of Enterprise Operations. Potential restraints include: Increasing Penetration Of Trends Like Big Data And IoT, Increase In The Volume Of Data Generated And Shift Of Enterprise Operations. Notable trends are: Retail and E-commerce to Hold Significant Share.

Background HealthCyberMap aims at mapping parts of health information cyberspace in novel ways to deliver a semantically superior user experience. This is achieved through "intelligent" categorisation and interactive hypermedia visualisation of health resources using metadata, clinical codes and GIS. HealthCyberMap is an ArcView 3.1 project. WebView, the Internet extension to ArcView, publishes HealthCyberMap ArcView Views as Web client-side imagemaps. The basic WebView set-up does not support any GIS database connection, and published Web maps become disconnected from the original project. A dedicated Internet map server would be the best way to serve HealthCyberMap database-driven interactive Web maps, but is an expensive and complex solution to acquire, run and maintain. This paper describes HealthCyberMap simple, low-cost method for "patching" WebView to serve hypermaps with dynamic database drill-down functionality on the Web. Results The proposed solution is currently used for publishing HealthCyberMap GIS-generated navigational information maps on the Web while maintaining their links with the underlying resource metadata base. Conclusion The authors believe their map serving approach as adopted in HealthCyberMap has been very successful, especially in cases when only map attribute data change without a corresponding effect on map appearance. It should be also possible to use the same solution to publish other interactive GIS-driven maps on the Web, e.g., maps of real world health problems.

Discover the explosive growth of the real-time index database market! This in-depth analysis reveals key trends, leading players (Elastic, AWS, Splunk), and future projections through 2033, highlighting the market's $15 billion valuation in 2025 and its robust CAGR. Learn about the drivers, restraints, and segmentation within this dynamic sector.

A complete list of live websites using the Wordpress Database Reset technology, compiled through global website indexing conducted by WebTechSurvey.

Abstract Public databases are essential to the development of multi-omics resources. The amount of data created by biological technologies needs a systematic and organized form of storage, that can quickly be accessed, and managed. This is the objective of a biological database. Here, we present an overview of human databases with web applications. The databases and tools allow the search of biological sequences, genes and genomes, gene expression patterns, epigenetic variation, protein-protein interactions, variant frequency, regulatory elements, and comparative analysis between human and model organisms. Our goal is to provide an opportunity for exploring large datasets and analyzing the data for users with little or no programming skills. Public user-friendly web-based databases facilitate data mining and the search for information applicable to healthcare professionals. Besides, biological databases are essential to improve biomedical search sensitivity and efficiency and merge multiple datasets needed to share data and build global initiatives for the diagnosis, prognosis, and discovery of new treatments for genetic diseases. To show the databases at work, we present a a case study using ACE2 as example of a gene to be investigated. The analysis and the complete list of databases is available in the following website .

This work was for a YouTube video in which we wanted to learn how to create fake data and how to query the database...

A complete list of live websites using the Movie Database technology, compiled through global website indexing conducted by WebTechSurvey.

The add-on had been designed for the VANTED framework and used to create QSDB Database's collection of clickable networks. Each network is laid out according to SBGN standards, showing quorum sensing and quorum quenching interactions between organisms and signaling molecules. This data set constitutes the source code of the add-on, developed to visualise the SBGN graphs of the QSDB Database using as input tabular aggregated data collected from existing literature.

Paper abstract: The human microbiome is largely shaped by the chemical interactions of its microbial members, which includes cross-talk via shared signals or quenching of the signalling of other species. Quorum sensing is a process that allows microbes to coordinate their behaviour in dependence of their population density and to adjust gene expression accordingly. We present the Quorum Sensing Database (QSDB), a comprehensive database of all published sensing and quenching relations between organisms and signalling molecules of the human microbiome, as well as an interactive web interface that allows browsing the database, provides graphical depictions of sensing mechanisms as Systems Biology Graphical Notation diagrams and links to other databases.

Database URL: QSDB (Quorum Sensing DataBase) is freely available via an interactive web interface and as a downloadable csv file at http://qsdb.org.

dbRES is a web-oriented comprehensive database for RNA Editing Site. dbRES contain only experimental validated RNA Editing Site. All the data in dbRES was manually collected from literatures reporting related experiment result or the GeneBank database. dbRES now contains all together 5437 RNA edit site data. dbRES covers altogether 95 organisms from 251 transcripts. RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification of RNA and markedly increases the complexity of the transcriptome. RNA editing occurs in the nucleus, as well as in mitochondria and plastids. To date such changes have been observed in prokaryotes, plants, animals and virus. The diversity of this widespread phenomenon includes nucleoside modifications, nucleotide additions and insertions, either in coding or non-coding sequences of RNA, which can occur concomitantly with transcription and splicing processes.

The global market for Non-relational SQL (often referred to as NoSQL databases) is poised for exceptional growth, projected to reach a significant $3070.1 million by 2025. This surge is fueled by an impressive Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 28.1%, indicating a rapid and sustained expansion throughout the forecast period of 2025-2033. The primary drivers behind this robust expansion are the increasing adoption of big data analytics, the proliferation of e-commerce platforms, the ever-growing demand for scalable mobile and web applications, and the critical need for efficient metadata storage and cache memory solutions. As businesses across all sectors grapple with the challenges of managing and processing vast, unstructured datasets, NoSQL databases are emerging as the go-to solution due to their flexibility, scalability, and ability to handle diverse data types. This market's dynamism is further underscored by the emergence of new trends such as the rise of multi-model databases that combine different NoSQL approaches, and the increasing integration of NoSQL with cloud-native architectures for enhanced agility and cost-effectiveness. Despite the overwhelmingly positive growth trajectory, certain restraints might moderate the pace of adoption in specific niches. These include the perceived complexity of migrating from traditional relational databases, the need for specialized skill sets among developers and administrators to effectively manage NoSQL environments, and ongoing concerns around data consistency for highly transactional applications. However, these challenges are being steadily addressed by advancements in database management tools, comprehensive training programs, and the development of hybrid solutions. The market is segmented by application, with Data Storage, Metadata Store, Cache Memory, Distributed Data Depository, e-Commerce, Mobile Apps, Web Applications, Data Analytics, and Social Networking representing key areas of adoption. By type, the market encompasses Key-Value Stores, Document Databases, Column-Based Stores, and Graph Databases, each catering to distinct data management requirements. Leading companies such as Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL, MongoDB, PostgreSQL, Oracle Database, DynamoDB, and IBM are at the forefront of innovation, offering a wide array of solutions to meet the evolving needs of businesses worldwide. The Asia Pacific region is anticipated to be a significant growth engine, driven by rapid digital transformation and a burgeoning tech industry, while North America and Europe will continue to represent mature and substantial markets. Here's a unique report description on Non-relational SQL, incorporating your specified elements:

Introduction

This datasets have SQL injection attacks (SLQIA) as malicious Netflow data. The attacks carried out are SQL injection for Union Query and Blind SQL injection. To perform the attacks, the SQLMAP tool has been used.

NetFlow traffic has generated using DOROTHEA (DOcker-based fRamework fOr gaTHering nEtflow trAffic). NetFlow is a network protocol developed by Cisco for the collection and monitoring of network traffic flow data generated. A flow is defined as a unidirectional sequence of packets with some common properties that pass through a network device.

Datasets

The firts dataset was colleted to train the detection models (D1) and other collected using different attacks than those used in training to test the models and ensure their generalization (D2).

The datasets contain both benign and malicious traffic. All collected datasets are balanced.

The version of NetFlow used to build the datasets is 5.

    Dataset
    Aim
    Samples
    Benign-malicious
    traffic ratio




    D1
    Training
    400,003
    50%


    D2
    Test
    57,239
    50%

Infrastructure and implementation

Two sets of flow data were collected with DOROTHEA. DOROTHEA is a Docker-based framework for NetFlow data collection. It allows you to build interconnected virtual networks to generate and collect flow data using the NetFlow protocol. In DOROTHEA, network traffic packets are sent to a NetFlow generator that has a sensor ipt_netflow installed. The sensor consists of a module for the Linux kernel using Iptables, which processes the packets and converts them to NetFlow flows.

DOROTHEA is configured to use Netflow V5 and export the flow after it is inactive for 15 seconds or after the flow is active for 1800 seconds (30 minutes)

Benign traffic generation nodes simulate network traffic generated by real users, performing tasks such as searching in web browsers, sending emails, or establishing Secure Shell (SSH) connections. Such tasks run as Python scripts. Users may customize them or even incorporate their own. The network traffic is managed by a gateway that performs two main tasks. On the one hand, it routes packets to the Internet. On the other hand, it sends it to a NetFlow data generation node (this process is carried out similarly to packets received from the Internet).

The malicious traffic collected (SQLI attacks) was performed using SQLMAP. SQLMAP is a penetration tool used to automate the process of detecting and exploiting SQL injection vulnerabilities.

The attacks were executed on 16 nodes and launch SQLMAP with the parameters of the following table.

    Parameters
    Description




    '--banner','--current-user','--current-db','--hostname','--is-dba','--users','--passwords','--privileges','--roles','--dbs','--tables','--columns','--schema','--count','--dump','--comments', --schema'
    Enumerate users, password hashes, privileges, roles, databases, tables and columns


    --level=5
    Increase the probability of a false positive identification


    --risk=3
    Increase the probability of extracting data


    --random-agent
    Select the User-Agent randomly


    --batch
    Never ask for user input, use the default behavior


    --answers="follow=Y"
    Predefined answers to yes

Every node executed SQLIA on 200 victim nodes. The victim nodes had deployed a web form vulnerable to Union-type injection attacks, which was connected to the MYSQL or SQLServer database engines (50% of the victim nodes deployed MySQL and the other 50% deployed SQLServer).

The web service was accessible from ports 443 and 80, which are the ports typically used to deploy web services. The IP address space was 182.168.1.1/24 for the benign and malicious traffic-generating nodes. For victim nodes, the address space was 126.52.30.0/24. The malicious traffic in the test sets was collected under different conditions. For D1, SQLIA was performed using Union attacks on the MySQL and SQLServer databases.

However, for D2, BlindSQL SQLIAs were performed against the web form connected to a PostgreSQL database. The IP address spaces of the networks were also different from those of D1. In D2, the IP address space was 152.148.48.1/24 for benign and malicious traffic generating nodes and 140.30.20.1/24 for victim nodes.

To run the MySQL server we ran MariaDB version 10.4.12. Microsoft SQL Server 2017 Express and PostgreSQL version 13 were used.

Discover the booming academic research databases market! This comprehensive analysis reveals key trends, growth drivers, and leading players (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, etc.) impacting this multi-billion dollar industry from 2019-2033. Explore market size, CAGR, regional insights, and future forecasts.

United States agricultural researchers have many options for making their data available online. This dataset aggregates the primary sources of ag-related data and determines where researchers are likely to deposit their agricultural data. These data serve as both a current landscape analysis and also as a baseline for future studies of ag research data. Purpose As sources of agricultural data become more numerous and disparate, and collaboration and open data become more expected if not required, this research provides a landscape inventory of online sources of open agricultural data. An inventory of current agricultural data sharing options will help assess how the Ag Data Commons, a platform for USDA-funded data cataloging and publication, can best support data-intensive and multi-disciplinary research. It will also help agricultural librarians assist their researchers in data management and publication. The goals of this study were to establish where agricultural researchers in the United States-- land grant and USDA researchers, primarily ARS, NRCS, USFS and other agencies -- currently publish their data, including general research data repositories, domain-specific databases, and the top journals compare how much data is in institutional vs. domain-specific vs. federal platforms determine which repositories are recommended by top journals that require or recommend the publication of supporting data ascertain where researchers not affiliated with funding or initiatives possessing a designated open data repository can publish data Approach The National Agricultural Library team focused on Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and United States Forest Service (USFS) style research data, rather than ag economics, statistics, and social sciences data. To find domain-specific, general, institutional, and federal agency repositories and databases that are open to US research submissions and have some amount of ag data, resources including re3data, libguides, and ARS lists were analysed. Primarily environmental or public health databases were not included, but places where ag grantees would publish data were considered. Search methods We first compiled a list of known domain specific USDA / ARS datasets / databases that are represented in the Ag Data Commons, including ARS Image Gallery, ARS Nutrition Databases (sub-components), SoyBase, PeanutBase, National Fungus Collection, i5K Workspace @ NAL, and GRIN. We then searched using search engines such as Bing and Google for non-USDA / federal ag databases, using Boolean variations of “agricultural data” /“ag data” / “scientific data” + NOT + USDA (to filter out the federal / USDA results). Most of these results were domain specific, though some contained a mix of data subjects. We then used search engines such as Bing and Google to find top agricultural university repositories using variations of “agriculture”, “ag data” and “university” to find schools with agriculture programs. Using that list of universities, we searched each university web site to see if their institution had a repository for their unique, independent research data if not apparent in the initial web browser search. We found both ag specific university repositories and general university repositories that housed a portion of agricultural data. Ag specific university repositories are included in the list of domain-specific repositories. Results included Columbia University – International Research Institute for Climate and Society, UC Davis – Cover Crops Database, etc. If a general university repository existed, we determined whether that repository could filter to include only data results after our chosen ag search terms were applied. General university databases that contain ag data included Colorado State University Digital Collections, University of Michigan ICPSR (Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research), and University of Minnesota DRUM (Digital Repository of the University of Minnesota). We then split out NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) repositories. Next we searched the internet for open general data repositories using a variety of search engines, and repositories containing a mix of data, journals, books, and other types of records were tested to determine whether that repository could filter for data results after search terms were applied. General subject data repositories include Figshare, Open Science Framework, PANGEA, Protein Data Bank, and Zenodo. Finally, we compared scholarly journal suggestions for data repositories against our list to fill in any missing repositories that might contain agricultural data. Extensive lists of journals were compiled, in which USDA published in 2012 and 2016, combining search results in ARIS, Scopus, and the Forest Service's TreeSearch, plus the USDA web sites Economic Research Service (ERS), National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Natural Resources and Conservation Service (NRCS), Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), Rural Development (RD), and Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS). The top 50 journals' author instructions were consulted to see if they (a) ask or require submitters to provide supplemental data, or (b) require submitters to submit data to open repositories. Data are provided for Journals based on a 2012 and 2016 study of where USDA employees publish their research studies, ranked by number of articles, including 2015/2016 Impact Factor, Author guidelines, Supplemental Data?, Supplemental Data reviewed?, Open Data (Supplemental or in Repository) Required? and Recommended data repositories, as provided in the online author guidelines for each the top 50 journals. Evaluation We ran a series of searches on all resulting general subject databases with the designated search terms. From the results, we noted the total number of datasets in the repository, type of resource searched (datasets, data, images, components, etc.), percentage of the total database that each term comprised, any dataset with a search term that comprised at least 1% and 5% of the total collection, and any search term that returned greater than 100 and greater than 500 results. We compared domain-specific databases and repositories based on parent organization, type of institution, and whether data submissions were dependent on conditions such as funding or affiliation of some kind. Results A summary of the major findings from our data review: Over half of the top 50 ag-related journals from our profile require or encourage open data for their published authors. There are few general repositories that are both large AND contain a significant portion of ag data in their collection. GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility), ICPSR, and ORNL DAAC were among those that had over 500 datasets returned with at least one ag search term and had that result comprise at least 5% of the total collection. Not even one quarter of the domain-specific repositories and datasets reviewed allow open submission by any researcher regardless of funding or affiliation. See included README file for descriptions of each individual data file in this dataset. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Journals. File Name: Journals.csvResource Title: Journals - Recommended repositories. File Name: Repos_from_journals.csvResource Title: TDWG presentation. File Name: TDWG_Presentation.pptxResource Title: Domain Specific ag data sources. File Name: domain_specific_ag_databases.csvResource Title: Data Dictionary for Ag Data Repository Inventory. File Name: Ag_Data_Repo_DD.csvResource Title: General repositories containing ag data. File Name: general_repos_1.csvResource Title: README and file inventory. File Name: README_InventoryPublicDBandREepAgData.txt

The organizations that contribute to the longevity of 67 long-lived molecular biology databases published in Nucleic Acids Research (NAR) between 1991-2016 were identified to address two research questions 1) which organizations fund these databases? and 2) which organizations maintain these databases? Funders were determined by examining funding acknowledgements in each database's most recent NAR Database Issue update article published (prior to 2017) and organizations operating the databases were determine through review of database websites.