The Live Healthy Loudoun Community Health Dashboard is a web-based data resource for the Loudoun County community. This site enables anybody to explore existing population data. The Community Health Dashboard provides online access to data on a broad range of topics, links to existing local data resources, and highlights promising practices to promote community health and well-being.The Community Health Dashboard is a component of the Live Healthy Loudoun initiative, which aims to transform our communities together. To learn more about this initiative, please visit us on the web at: https://www.loudoun.gov/livehealthy
This dashboard shows historic and current data related to this performance measure. The performance measure dashboard is available at 3.34 Community Health and Well-Being. Data Dictionary
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The performance measure dashboard is available at 3.34 Community Health and Well-Being. Data Dictionary
The following datasets are based on the children and youth (under age 21) beneficiary population and consist of aggregate Mental Health Service data derived from Medi-Cal claims, encounter, and eligibility systems. These datasets were developed in accordance with California Welfare and Institutions Code (WIC) § 14707.5 (added as part of Assembly Bill 470 on 10/7/17). Please contact BHData@dhcs.ca.gov for any questions or to request previous years’ versions of these datasets. Note: The Performance Dashboard AB 470 Report Application Excel tool development has been discontinued. Please see the Behavioral Health reporting data hub at https://behavioralhealth-data.dhcs.ca.gov/ for access to dashboards utilizing these datasets and other behavioral health data.
The How’s Life? database is the one-stop shop for the 80+ indicators of the OECD Well-being Dashboard, covering social, economic and environmental outcomes that matter most for people, the planet and future generations. It consists of six datasets: current well-being, current well-being vertical inequalities, current well-being by age, educational attainment, sex, and resources for future well-being. To learn more about the database, visit the database's definitions and metadata.
This dataflow covers: Current well-being.
There are 11 dimensions of current well-being in this dataset:
The following datasets are based on the adult (age 21 and over) beneficiary population and consist of aggregate MHS data derived from Medi-Cal claims, encounter, and eligibility systems. These datasets were developed in accordance with California Welfare and Institutions Code (WIC) § 14707.5 (added as part of Assembly Bill 470 on 10/7/17). Please contact BHData@dhcs.ca.gov for any questions or to request previous years’ versions of these datasets. Note: The Performance Dashboard AB 470 Report Application Excel tool development has been discontinued. Please see the Behavioral Health reporting data hub at https://behavioralhealth-data.dhcs.ca.gov/ for access to dashboards utilizing these datasets and other behavioral health data.
https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy
The personalized health dashboard service market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing adoption of wearable technology, rising health consciousness among consumers, and the proliferation of remote patient monitoring solutions. The market's expansion is fueled by a convergence of factors: the availability of sophisticated data analytics capabilities allowing for personalized health insights, the growing demand for preventative healthcare, and the increasing integration of health data from diverse sources (wearables, EMRs, etc.) into a single, easily accessible dashboard. This allows individuals and healthcare providers to make more informed decisions, leading to improved health outcomes and reduced healthcare costs. While the precise market size for 2025 is unavailable, considering a reasonable CAGR of 15% from a hypothetical 2024 market size of $5 billion (a conservative estimate given the market's growth trajectory), we can project a 2025 market size of approximately $5.75 billion. This growth is expected to continue throughout the forecast period (2025-2033). Key players like Fitbit (Google), Apple HealthKit, and Garmin Connect are leading the market, leveraging their established user bases and technological expertise. However, the market is also characterized by a significant number of emerging companies focusing on specialized areas within personalized health, like chronic disease management (Omada Health, Vida Health). Market restraints include data privacy concerns, interoperability challenges between different health data platforms, and the need for robust cybersecurity measures to protect sensitive patient information. Future trends include increased personalization driven by AI and machine learning, greater integration with telehealth platforms, and the development of more sophisticated predictive analytics capabilities to anticipate potential health risks. The segmentation within the market likely includes various pricing tiers based on features and functionalities, different user types (individual consumers, healthcare providers, employers), and service delivery models. The geographic distribution is expected to see continued strong performance in North America and Europe, followed by steady expansion in Asia-Pacific and other emerging markets.
This data set has been archived and will no longer be maintained after January 2018.
The Performance Dashboard (formerly Performance Outcomes System) datasets are developed in line with legislative mandates to improve outcomes and inform decision making regarding individuals receiving Medi-Cal Specialty Mental Health Services (SMHS). The Dashboard gathers information relevant to specific mental health outcomes and provides useful summary reports for ongoing quality improvement and to support decision making. Please note: the Excel file Performance Dashboard has been discontinued and replaced with the SMHS Performance Dashboards found on Behavioral Health Reporting (ca.gov).
The Performance Dashboard (formerly Performance Outcomes System) datasets are developed in line with legislative mandates to improve outcomes and inform decision making regarding individuals receiving Medi-Cal Specialty Mental Health Services (SMHS). The Dashboard gathers information relevant to specific mental health outcomes and provides useful summary reports for ongoing quality improvement and to support decision making. Please note: the Excel file Performance Dashboard has been discontinued and replaced with the SMHS Performance Dashboards found on Behavioral Health Reporting (ca.gov).
Cities with City Health Dashboard data currently in Chattadata
The health system dashboard provides headline indicators and supporting statistics on the Tasmanian public health system. It provides a wide range of information about the performance of Tasmania’s …Show full descriptionThe health system dashboard provides headline indicators and supporting statistics on the Tasmanian public health system. It provides a wide range of information about the performance of Tasmania’s health system services, including hospital, oral health, breast screening, mental health and ambulance services. The health system dashboard is published four times a year through the HealthStats website (https://www.healthstats.dhhs.tas.gov.au). The Data Notes document contains a brief description of indicators, caveats and notes to assist with interpretation of the dataset. The Data Notes should be read before interpreting or making use of the data.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
IntroductionPublic health is not only threatened by diseases, pandemics, or epidemics. It is also challenged by deficits in the communication of health information. The current COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates that impressively. One way to deliver scientific data such as epidemiological findings and forecasts on disease spread are dashboards. Considering the current relevance of dashboards for public risk and crisis communication, this systematic review examines the state of research on dashboards in the context of public health risks and diseases.MethodNine electronic databases where searched for peer-reviewed journal articles and conference proceedings. Included articles (n = 65) were screened and assessed by three independent reviewers. Through a methodological informed differentiation between descriptive studies and user studies, the review also assessed the quality of included user studies (n = 18) by use of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).Results65 articles were assessed in regards to the public health issues addressed by the respective dashboards, as well as the data sources, functions and information visualizations employed by the different dashboards. Furthermore, the literature review sheds light on public health challenges and objectives and analyzes the extent to which user needs play a role in the development and evaluation of a dashboard. Overall, the literature review shows that studies that do not only describe the construction of a specific dashboard, but also evaluate its content in terms of different risk communication models or constructs (e.g., risk perception or health literacy) are comparatively rare. Furthermore, while some of the studies evaluate usability and corresponding metrics from the perspective of potential users, many of the studies are limited to a purely functionalistic evaluation of the dashboard by the respective development teams.ConclusionThe results suggest that applied research on public health intervention tools like dashboards would gain in complexity through a theory-based integration of user-specific risk information needs.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=200178, identifier: CRD42020200178.
Racial/ethnic health disparities are higher rates of serious health conditions or deaths that affect communities of color. These disparities can result in shorter lifespans and lower quality of life, are rooted in inequities in the opportunities and resources needed for good health, such as education, employment, safe and healthy neighborhoods, and access to health care. These inequities are often the result of current and historical institutionalized racism or explicit racial bias.
The Community Life Survey collects information about the wellbeing of adults (16+).
In October 2018, the Prime Minister launched the government’s first loneliness strategy for England. This statistical release presents the most recent headline findings on levels of loneliness, as well as support networks and social networks.
The Community Life Survey uses the Government Statistical Service (GSS) harmonised principle of loneliness and wellbeing. The estimates presented here are therefore comparable with other surveys that use this principle. However we advise taking caution when comparing measures from different surveys because differences in the methodology (e.g. mode/sampling approach) will all affect estimates. Other statistical data sets that use this definition, and therefore have comparative data, are available from the https://gss.civilservice.gov.uk/policy-store/loneliness-indicators/" class="govuk-link">GSS guidance page. In Annex C there are details of further surveys that have adopted the Government Statistical Service harmonised principles of loneliness and Wellbeing.
Average scores for life satisfaction, the extent to how worthwhile the respondent felt things in their life were and happiness have decreased since 2019/20.
Life satisfaction score was 6.9 (out of 10) in 2020/21, a decrease from 7.0 in 2019/20.
How happy people felt yesterday decreased from 7.0 (out of 10) in 2019/20 to 6.8 in 2020/21. This has trended downwards from 7.2 in 2015/16.
Whether people felt the things they did were worthwhile decreased to 7.1 (out of 10) in 2020/21 from 7.3 in 2020/21.
How anxious people felt yesterday at the time of survey completion averaged at 3.8 (out of 10), which was in line with the figure in 2019/20. This figure has trended upwards from 2015/16 where it was 3.3.
6% of respondents (approximately 3 million people in England) said they felt lonely often/always. This is in line with reported loneliness from 2019/20.
Loneliness was higher for 16-24 year olds, the most deprived and those with a long term limiting illness or disability.
An indirect loneliness composite score was produced which found significantly higher loneliness scores for those with a long term limiting illness or disability compared to those without.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/articles/measuresofnationalwellbeingdashboard/2018-04-25" class="govuk-link">Measures of National Wellbeing Dashboard, which monitors and reports on multiple wellbeing measures.
Chapter 1 of the Community Life Survey provides estimates on support networks and methods of communicating with friends and family.
In December 2020, DCMS published the second ’Community Life Survey: Focus on Loneliness’. This used data from the 2019/20 survey, giving more detailed breakdowns by demographics and looking at the link between loneliness and other measures from the survey, such as volunteering and community engagement.
In June 2020, the Office for National Statistics released a paper titled “https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/bulletins/coronavirusandlonelinessgreatbritain/3aprilto3may2020" class="govuk-link">Coronavirus and Loneliness, Great Britain”, which gives an overview of how different groups of people experienced loneliness during the COVID-19 Pandemic. A number of other studies of the effect of the Coronavirus pandemic on loneliness have been published. These include the https://www.covidsocialstudy.org/" class="govuk-link">COVID Social Study (conducted by University College London), and the ONS publication https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/articles/mappinglonelinessduringthecoronaviruspandemic/2021-04-07" class="govuk-link">Mapping Loneliness during the coronavirus pandemic.
The following dashboard shows statewide Behavioral Health Help Line (BHHL) utilization data and some demographic data about BHHL callers. This data is collected by the Massachusetts Behavioral Health Partnership (MBHP), the vendor that operates the BHHL, and maintained by the Department of Mental Health (DMH).
The https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/inequality-tools" class="govuk-link">Health Inequalities Dashboard presents data on health inequalities for England, English regions and local authorities. It presents measures of inequality for 19 indicators, mostly drawn from the https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/public-health-outcomes-framework" class="govuk-link">Public Health Outcomes Framework (PHOF).
Data is available for a number of dimensions of inequality. Most indicators show socioeconomic inequalities, including by level of deprivation, and some indicators show inequalities between ethnic groups. For smoking prevalence, data is presented for a wider range of dimensions, including sexual orientation and religion.
Details of the latest release can be found in ‘Health Inequalities Dashboard: statistical commentary, May 2025’.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset supports the Philadelphia Council District Health Dashboard, an interactive web application that visualizes health disparities and social determinants of health across Philadelphia's 10 City Council Districts. The dashboard provides district-level insights to guide equitable policy and investment decisions by City Council members and the public.
Philadelphia residents experience drastically different health outcomes across the city – differences shaped by federal, state, and local policies rather than individual choices alone. This project maps key health indicators across all 10 Philadelphia City Council Districts to show how politics and geography intersect to shape Philadelphian health.
Data aggregated from original geographic units to City Council District boundaries using population-weighted methods.
data_v1.csv
- Main dataset containing health indicators by Philadelphia City Council Districtcodebook_v1.csv
- Complete metadata and variable documentationSupports policy analysis, community advocacy, academic research, and public health planning at the district level.
Amber Bolli, Tamara Rushovich, Ran Li, Stephanie Hernandez, Alina Schnake-Mahl
Transform Academia for Equity grant from Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Philadelphia, City Council, Health Disparities, Social Determinants, Urban Health, Public Policy, Geospatial Analysis
Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
This dashboard shows information about how the Issues of Export Health Certificates service is currently performing.
This is a "beta" service. The dashboard shows number of digital transactions, total cost of transactions, cost per transaction and take-up of digital services. Performance Dashboards are likely to be used by many people, including:
government service managers and their teams journalists students and researchers members of the public interested in how public services are performing The service also provides the option of a download of the data. Attribution statement:
This dashboard shows information about how the Animal health: subscriptions to alerts for exotic disease outbreaks service is currently performing. This is a "beta" service. The dashboard shows number of digital transactions, total cost of transactions, cost per transaction and take-up of digital services. Performance Dashboards are likely to be used by many people, including:
government service managers and their teams journalists students and researchers members of the public interested in how public services are performing The service also provides the option of a download of the data.
The Live Healthy Loudoun Community Health Dashboard is a web-based data resource for the Loudoun County community. This site enables anybody to explore existing population data. The Community Health Dashboard provides online access to data on a broad range of topics, links to existing local data resources, and highlights promising practices to promote community health and well-being.The Community Health Dashboard is a component of the Live Healthy Loudoun initiative, which aims to transform our communities together. To learn more about this initiative, please visit us on the web at: https://www.loudoun.gov/livehealthy