9 datasets found
  1. West Adams, Los Angeles, CA, US Demographics 2025

    • point2homes.com
    html
    Updated 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Point2Homes (2025). West Adams, Los Angeles, CA, US Demographics 2025 [Dataset]. https://www.point2homes.com/US/Neighborhood/CA/Los-Angeles/West-Adams-Demographics.html
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Point2Homeshttps://plus.google.com/116333963642442482447/posts
    Time period covered
    2025
    Area covered
    United States, California, West Adams, Los Angeles
    Variables measured
    Asian, Other, White, 2 units, Over 65, Median age, Blue collar, Mobile home, 3 or 4 units, 5 to 9 units, and 69 more
    Description

    Comprehensive demographic dataset for West Adams, Los Angeles, CA, US including population statistics, household income, housing units, education levels, employment data, and transportation with year-over-year changes.

  2. p

    West Adams Preparatory High School

    • publicschoolreview.com
    json, xml
    Updated Feb 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Public School Review (2025). West Adams Preparatory High School [Dataset]. https://www.publicschoolreview.com/west-adams-preparatory-high-school-profile
    Explore at:
    json, xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 9, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Public School Review
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2008 - Dec 31, 2025
    Description

    Historical Dataset of West Adams Preparatory High School is provided by PublicSchoolReview and contain statistics on metrics:Total Students Trends Over Years (2009-2022),Total Classroom Teachers Trends Over Years (2008-2023),Distribution of Students By Grade Trends,Student-Teacher Ratio Comparison Over Years (2009-2022),Asian Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2008-2022),Hispanic Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2010-2022),Black Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2010-2022),White Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2017-2022),Diversity Score Comparison Over Years (2010-2022),Free Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2010-2022),Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2008-2022),Reading and Language Arts Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2011-2022),Math Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2012-2023),Overall School Rank Trends Over Years (2012-2023),Graduation Rate Comparison Over Years (2013-2023)

  3. i

    Grant Giving Statistics for West Adams Church of Christ of Los Angeles

    • instrumentl.com
    Updated Sep 17, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2021). Grant Giving Statistics for West Adams Church of Christ of Los Angeles [Dataset]. https://www.instrumentl.com/990-report/west-adams-church-of-christ-of-los-angeles
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 17, 2021
    Area covered
    Los Angeles, West Adams
    Variables measured
    Total Assets
    Description

    Financial overview and grant giving statistics of West Adams Church of Christ of Los Angeles

  4. i

    Grant Giving Statistics for Organization of West Adams Christian Athletics

    • instrumentl.com
    Updated Dec 19, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2022). Grant Giving Statistics for Organization of West Adams Christian Athletics [Dataset]. https://www.instrumentl.com/990-report/organization-of-west-adams-christian-athletics
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 19, 2022
    Area covered
    West Adams
    Variables measured
    Total Assets
    Description

    Financial overview and grant giving statistics of Organization of West Adams Christian Athletics

  5. a

    072121 Mowle attachment 3

    • redistricting-gallery-coleg.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Aug 7, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    louis_pino (2021). 072121 Mowle attachment 3 [Dataset]. https://redistricting-gallery-coleg.hub.arcgis.com/maps/d179e1ae00fa4a659b5febb21567121a
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 7, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    louis_pino
    Area covered
    Description

    This is a comment on the preliminary Congressional Commission redistricting map. Along with providing feedback on that map, it offers a draft alternative that better meets the criteria of the Colorado Constitution. As background, I participated in redistricting initiatives in South Bend, Indiana, in the mid-1980s and for Indiana legislative seats after the 1990 census. I didn’t engage with redistricting during the rest of my 20-year military career. After retiring, and while serving as Public Trustee for El Paso County, I participated in redistricting efforts at the county and city level. I also stood for El Paso County Clerk in 2010. I have lived in Colorado since 2000. The draft alternative map is created using Dave’s Redistricting App (DRA) and can be found at https://davesredistricting.org/join/346f297c-71d1-4443-9110-b92e3362b105. I used DRA because it was more user-friendly in that it allows selection by precinct and by city or town, while the tool provided by the commission seems to allow only selection by census block (or larger clusters). The two tools also use slightly different population estimates, but this will be resolved when the 2020 data are released in August. These comments acknowledge that any map created using estimated populations will need to change to account for the actual census data.

    Description of Draft Alternative
    
        My process started by
    

    identifying large-scale geographic communities of interest within Colorado: the Western Slope/mountain areas, the Eastern Plains, Colorado Springs/El Paso County, the North Front Range, and Denver Metro. Two smaller geographic communities of interest are Pueblo and the San Luis Valley—neither is nearly large enough to sustain a district and both are somewhat distinct from their neighboring communities of interest. A choice thus must be made about which other communities of interest to group them with. El Paso County is within 0.3% of the optimal population, so it is set as District 5. The true Western Slope is not large enough to sustain a district, even with the obvious addition of Jackson County. Rather than including the San Luis Valley with the Western Slope, the preliminary commission map extends the Western Slope district to include all of Fremont County (even Canon City, Florence, and Penrose), Clear Creek County, and some of northern Boulder County. The draft alternative District 3 instead adds the San Luis Valley, the Upper Arkansas Valley (Lake and Chaffee Counties, and the western part of Fremont County), Park and Teller Counties, and Custer County. The draft alternative District 4 is based on the Eastern Plains. In the south, this includes the rest of Fremont County (including Canon City), Pueblo, and the Lower Arkansas Valley. In the north, this includes all of Weld County, retaining it as an intact political subdivision. This is nearly enough population to form a complete district; it is rounded out by including the easternmost portions of Adams and Arapahoe Counties. All of Elbert County is in this district; none of Douglas County is. The draft alternative District 2 is placed in the North Front Range and includes Larimer, Boulder, Gilpin, and Clear Creek Counties. This is nearly enough population to form a complete district, so it is rounded out by adding Evergreen and the rest of Coal Creek in Jefferson County. The City and County of Denver (and the Arapahoe County enclave municipalities of Glendale and Holly Hills) forms the basis of draft alternative District 1. This is a bit too large to form a district, so small areas are shaved off into neighboring districts: DIA (mostly for compactness), Indian Creek, and part of Marston. This leaves three districts to place in suburban Denver. The draft alternative keeps Douglas County intact, as well as the city of Aurora, except for the part that extends into Douglas County. The map prioritizes the county over the city as a political subdivision. Draft alternative District 6, anchored in Douglas County, extends north into Arapahoe County to include suburbs like Centennial, Littleton, Englewood, Greenwood Village, and Cherry Hills Village. This is not enough population, so the district extends west into southern Jefferson County to include Columbine, Ken Caryl, and Dakota Ridge. The northwestern edge of this district would run along Deer Creek Road, Pleasant Park Road, and Kennedy Gulch Road. Draft alternative District 8, anchored in Aurora, includes the rest of western Arapahoe County and extends north into Adams County to include Commerce City, Brighton (except the part in Weld County), Thornton, and North Washington. In the draft alternative, this district includes a sliver of Northglenn east of Stonehocker Park. While this likely would be resolved when final population totals are released, this division of Northglenn is the most notable division of a city within a single county other than the required division of Denver. Draft alternative District 7 encompasses what is left: The City and County of Broomfield; Westminster, in both Jefferson and Adams Counties; Federal Heights, Sherrelwood, Welby, Twin Lakes, Berkley, and almost all of Northglenn in western Adams County; and Lakewood, Arvada, Golden, Wheat Ridge, Morrison, Indian Hills, Aspen Park, Genesee, and Kittredge in northern Jefferson County. The border with District 2 through the communities in the western portion of Jefferson County would likely be adjusted after final population totals are released.

    Comparison of Maps
    
    Precise Population Equality
        The preliminary commission
    

    map has exact population equality. The draft alternative map has a variation of 0.6% (4,239 persons). Given that the maps are based on population estimates, and that I left it at the precinct and municipality level, this aspect of the preliminary map is premature to pinpoint. Once final population data are released, either map would need to be adjusted. It would be simple to tweak district boundaries to achieve any desired level of equality. That said, such precision is a bit of a fallacy: errors in the census data likely exceed the 0.6% in the draft map, the census data will be a year out of date when received, and relative district populations will fluctuate over the next 10 years. Both the “good-faith effort†and “as practicable†language leave room for a bit of variance in service of other goals. The need to “justify any variance†does not mean “no variance will be allowed.†For example, it may be better to maintain unity in a community of interest or political subdivision rather than separate part of it for additional precision. The major sticking point here is likely to be El Paso County: given how close it seems to be to the optimal district size, will it be worth it to divide the county or one of its neighbors to achieve precision? The same question would be likely to apply among the municipalities in Metro Denver.

    Contiguity
        The draft alternative map
    

    meets this requirement. The preliminary commission map violates the spirit if not the actual language of this requirement. While its districts are connected by land, the only way to travel to all parts of preliminary Districts 3 and 4 without leaving the districts would be on foot. There is no road connection between the parts of Boulder County that are in District 3 and the rest of that district in Grand County without leaving the district and passing through District 2 in either Gilpin or Larimer Counties. There also is no road connection between some of the southwestern portions of Mineral County and the rest of District 4 without passing through Archuleta or Hinsdale Counties in District 3.

    Voting Rights Act
        The preliminary staff
    

    analysis assumes it would be possible to create a majority-minority district; they are correct, it can be done via a noncompact district running from the west side of Denver up to Commerce City and Brighton and down to parts of northeastern Denver and northern Aurora. Such a district would go against criteria for compactness, political subdivisions, and even other definitions of communities of interest. Staff asserts that the election of Democratic candidates in this area suffices for VRA. Appendix B is opaque regarding the actual non-White or Hispanic population in each district, but I presume that if they had created a majority-minority district they would have said so. In the draft alternative map, District 8 (Aurora, Commerce City, Brighton, and Thornton) has a 39.6% minority population and District 1 (Denver) has a 34.9% minority population. The proposals are similar in meeting this criterion.

    Communities of Interest
        Staff presented a long list
    

    of communities of interest. While keeping all of these intact would be ideal, drawing a map requires compromises based on geography and population. Many communities of interest overlap with each other, especially at their edges. This difficulty points to a reason to focus on existing subdivisions (county, city, and town boundaries): those boundaries are stable and overlap with shared public policy concerns. The preliminary commission map chooses to group the San Luis Valley, as far upstream as Del Norte and Creede, with Pueblo and the Eastern Plains rather than with the Western Slope/Mountains. To balance the population numbers, the preliminary commission map thus had to reach east in northern and central Colorado. The commission includes Canon City and Florence

  6. a

    033021 Michael B

    • redistricting-gallery-coleg.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Sep 1, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    louis_pino (2021). 033021 Michael B [Dataset]. https://redistricting-gallery-coleg.hub.arcgis.com/items/c7947912e8a7423d9e2d63a0d9d5cf51
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 1, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    louis_pino
    Description

    I have lived all over this great state and have spent time in every corner, so just making a recommendation on a single solitary community will not do. If it pleases the commission, I would like to submit the attached file as a recommendation for 2021's redistricted congressional map. CO-01 - The 1st would shed its northern and eastern portions while shifting south to accommodate the new 8th. It would be an extremely wealthy district containing the upper class suburbs of Denver, as well as Columbine, Ken Caryl, Centennial, and Highlands Ranch. CO-02 - The 2nd would shift eastward, shedding its mountain communities while taking in Greeley and Longmont to become a truly Northern Colorado district. CO-03 - The western-based 3rd would take in the mountain communities of the 2nd while letting go of historically, culturally, and hydrologically separate portions of southern Colorado. CO-04 - The 4th would become a Southern Colorado district, stretching from the south of Colorado Springs to Pueblo, down across the San Luis Valley, and concluding in Durango and Cortez. Additionally, this district would become the 2nd most diverse in the state, and an extremely competitive district at that! CO-05 - The 5th would be based in the north portions of Colorado Springs, an area unique to the south of the city in its demographics, wealth, and ties to the United States Air Force. It would take in the entirety of culturally similar Eastern Colorado, ensuring that this sparsely populated region of ~100,000 people would maintain its voice in Washington. CO-06 - The 6th would move out of Brighton and Thornton, with Parker absorbed in its entirety as it so closely resembles south Aurora in wealth, demographics, and travel habits. Previously the most malformed district the new 6th would be incredibly compact! CO-07 - The 7th remains largely unchanged, save for parts lost to the 8th and a continued move up I-25 as growing neighborhoods continue to sprout up from old farmlands. CO-08 - The 8th would be the most diverse district in the state, taking in the largely Hispanic portions for west Denver and Adams County. Previously divided between the old 1st, 6th, and 7th, this district would ensure a united voice for a previously underrepresented community in Colorado In summary: 4 districts are centered around Denver, matching the 50% of the state's population that lives in Denver, Adams, Arapahoe, Jefferson, Douglas, and Broomfield counties (i.e., the Denver Metro Area minus Boulder County). Four districts represent the four unique "corners" of our state outside of Denver: Southern Colorado, the Eastern Plains, Northern Colorado, and the Western Slope. These districts contain contiguous communities, following highways and major roads to ensure easy travel for our future representatives. Finally, they are of course as equal to one another in population as can be expected, however minor adjustments will likely need to be made once proper census numbers are made available. Thank you for your time. *Please note that previous attempts at this submission were made using .geojson and .csv files, however the website did not recognize them and produced an error. Therefore I have attached a .png, the only other functional format I have available.

  7. n

    Adam Pota Census 2011

    • gramvikas.nskmultiservices.in
    Updated Mar 1, 2011
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2011). Adam Pota Census 2011 [Dataset]. https://gramvikas.nskmultiservices.in/india/west-bengal/nadia/nakashipara/adam-pota
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 1, 2011
    License

    https://data.gov.in/sites/default/files/Gazette_Notification_OGDL.pdfhttps://data.gov.in/sites/default/files/Gazette_Notification_OGDL.pdf

    Time period covered
    2011
    Description

    Comprehensive population and demographic data for Adam Pota Village

  8. Physical and socio-demographic characteristics of the 1854 participants to...

    • plos.figshare.com
    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 9, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Guillaume Ruel; Jean-Frédéric Lévesque; Nigel Stocks; Caroline Sirois; Edeltraut Kroger; Robert J. Adams; Mariève Doucet; Anne W. Taylor (2023). Physical and socio-demographic characteristics of the 1854 participants to the North West Adelaide Health Study at baseline (2002). [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096291.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 9, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Guillaume Ruel; Jean-Frédéric Lévesque; Nigel Stocks; Caroline Sirois; Edeltraut Kroger; Robert J. Adams; Mariève Doucet; Anne W. Taylor
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Physical and socio-demographic characteristics of the 1854 participants to the North West Adelaide Health Study at baseline (2002).

  9. n

    Adam Chak Census 2011

    • gramvikas.nskmultiservices.in
    Updated Mar 1, 2011
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2011). Adam Chak Census 2011 [Dataset]. https://gramvikas.nskmultiservices.in/india/west-bengal/paschim-medinipur/keshpur/adam-chak#!
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 1, 2011
    License

    https://data.gov.in/sites/default/files/Gazette_Notification_OGDL.pdfhttps://data.gov.in/sites/default/files/Gazette_Notification_OGDL.pdf

    Time period covered
    2011
    Description

    Comprehensive population and demographic data for Adam Chak Village

  10. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Point2Homes (2025). West Adams, Los Angeles, CA, US Demographics 2025 [Dataset]. https://www.point2homes.com/US/Neighborhood/CA/Los-Angeles/West-Adams-Demographics.html
Organization logo

West Adams, Los Angeles, CA, US Demographics 2025

Explore at:
htmlAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
2025
Dataset authored and provided by
Point2Homeshttps://plus.google.com/116333963642442482447/posts
Time period covered
2025
Area covered
United States, California, West Adams, Los Angeles
Variables measured
Asian, Other, White, 2 units, Over 65, Median age, Blue collar, Mobile home, 3 or 4 units, 5 to 9 units, and 69 more
Description

Comprehensive demographic dataset for West Adams, Los Angeles, CA, US including population statistics, household income, housing units, education levels, employment data, and transportation with year-over-year changes.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu