15 datasets found
  1. U

    Point Locations of Abandoned Underground Coal Mine Aquifer Water-Quality...

    • data.usgs.gov
    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    • +3more
    Updated Jul 11, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mitchell Mcadoo; Mark Kozar (2024). Point Locations of Abandoned Underground Coal Mine Aquifer Water-Quality Sites in West Virginia, 1973 through 2016 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5066/F7TM78C5
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 11, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    Mitchell Mcadoo; Mark Kozar
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jul 13, 1973 - Sep 7, 2016
    Area covered
    West Virginia
    Description

    This data-file represents point locations of sites that are associated with water-quality data from abandoned underground coal mine aquifers in West Virginia. It is intended to act as a geographic representation of the locational data from the associated Data Release titled Site and Groundwater-Quality Sample Data for Abandoned Underground Coal Mine Aquifers in West Virginia, July 13, 1973 through September 7, 2016. The first two rows of this file should be used as header information. Also included on this page is a .zip file which contains a shapefile for geospatial representation of the data. These files have specific site-data and attributes that are described in their metadata xml files.

  2. abandoned mine lands

    • data-wvdep.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Dec 15, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (2020). abandoned mine lands [Dataset]. https://data-wvdep.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/de6c8f8018ac4278b3399aaa9c99ff13
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 15, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    West Virginia Department of Environmental Protectionhttps://www.dep.wv.gov/
    Area covered
    Description

    Identified problem areas and standardized problem types that comprise an inventory of problems associated with mining prior to the 1977 Surface Mining Reclemation and Control Act.

  3. a

    Locations of the West Virginia Mine Wars

    • nps.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Aug 30, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Park Service (2023). Locations of the West Virginia Mine Wars [Dataset]. https://nps.hub.arcgis.com/maps/nps::locations-of-the-west-virginia-mine-wars
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 30, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    National Park Service
    Area covered
    Description

    Spatial data for The West Virginia Mine Wars: An American Labor Conflict in Appalachia StoryMap as updated in September 2023. This StoryMap was developed by the National Historic Landmarks (NHL) program and the National Capital Regional Office, National Park Service. This data was originally downloaded from the Classic StoryMaps version of the StoryMap and republished to exist independent of the Classic StoryMap during the update process.The corresponding NPS DataStore on Integrated Resource Management Applications (IRMA) reference for the source data is West Virginia Mine Wars: An American Labor Conflict in Appalachia StoryMap.The West Virginia Mine Wars: An American Labor Conflict in Appalachia StoryMap, developed by the National Historic Landmarks (NHL) program and the National Capital Regional Office, National Park Service covers the coal miners fight for employee rights. From 1912 to 1921, thousands of coal miners in the southern coalfields of West Virginia fought violently against coal company operators to secure their right to unionize and abolish the brutal mine guard system.The research content presented in this National Park Service StoryMap was prepared by Dr. Rachel Donaldson, a labor historian in association with the Organization of American Historians. Dr. Donaldson was a co-author for the National Historic Landmark study of the Jefferson County Courthouse. The original StoryMap was designed and organized by National Capital Region National Historic Landmark Program Intern Max Sickler in 2021. The updated StoryMap was created by Samantha Melvin in January 2024.For full details read the West Virginia Mine Wars series on NPS.gov. The images in this StoryMap are available on NPGallery in the West Virginia Mine Wars Story Map Album.

  4. a

    NCR Paint Creek Cabin Creek Strike Site

    • nps.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jun 1, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Park Service (2021). NCR Paint Creek Cabin Creek Strike Site [Dataset]. https://nps.hub.arcgis.com/maps/2ebb5cd2359c4224b6f7d1d8158e37f6
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    National Park Service
    Area covered
    Description

    This web map is used in The West Virginia Mine Wars: An American Labor Conflict in Appalachia StoryMap, developed by the National Historic Landmarks (NHL) program and the National Capital Regional Office, National Park Service. The StoryMap covers the coal miners fight for employee rights. From 1912 to 1921, thousands of coal miners in the southern coalfields of West Virginia fought violently against coal company operators to secure their right to unionize and abolish the brutal mine guard system.The research content presented in this National Park Service StoryMap was prepared by Dr. Rachel Donaldson, a labor historian in association with the Organization of American Historians. Dr. Donaldson was a co-author for the National Historic Landmark study of the Jefferson County Courthouse. The original StoryMap was designed and organized by National Capital Region National Historic Landmark Program Intern Max Sickler in 2021. The updated StoryMap was created by Samantha Melvin in January 2024.For full details read the West Virginia Mine Wars series on NPS.gov. The images in this StoryMap are available on NPGallery in the West Virginia Mine Wars Story Map Album.

  5. d

    Coking coal of the United States: Modern and historical locations of coking...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.usgs.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Jul 6, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2024). Coking coal of the United States: Modern and historical locations of coking coal mining locations and chemical, rheological, petrographic, and other data from modern samples [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/coking-coal-of-the-united-states-modern-and-historical-locations-of-coking-coal-mining-loc
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 6, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    For the open-file report we collected new coking coal samples from Alabama, Kentucky, Oklahoma and Arkansas and analyzed them for proximate and ultimate analyses; calorific value; sulfur forms; major-, minor-, and trace-element abundances; free swelling indices; Gieseler plasticity; ASTM dilatation; coal petrography, and several other tests [air-dry loss (ADL), residual moisture (RM), equilibrium moisture (EQM), and true specific gravity (TSG)]. Coal Stability Factor (CSF) and Coal Strength after Reaction with CO2 (CSR) were predicted using chemical, rheological, and petrographic data (pCSF and pCSR, respectively). In addition, data from previously analyzed samples in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Virginia, and Kentucky were shared with us by three companies, including results from the tests listed above, plus oxidation, Hardgrove Grindability Index (HGI), and ash fusion temperatures. These data are the contents of appendices 2-8 of the open-file report and this data release. In addition, appendices 20 and 21 of the open-file report and this data release include data previously published by the U.S. Bureau of Mines (USBM) in their Minerals Yearbooks listing the annual amounts of coal purchased (in short tons) for manufacturing oven-coke in six coal districts in Pennsylvania from 1942-1965 (in appendix 20), and the annual amounts of coal received by oven-coke plants (in short tons) in 17 Pennsylvania counties from 1966-1976 (in appendix 21). These previously published data have been included in this data release because they are currently not available online and the original USBM paper publications are not available in most libraries.

  6. K

    United States Coal Refuse

    • koordinates.com
    csv, dwg, geodatabase +6
    Updated Dec 20, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    US Department of the Interior (DOI) (2022). United States Coal Refuse [Dataset]. https://koordinates.com/layer/111520-united-states-coal-refuse/
    Explore at:
    dwg, mapinfo mif, geopackage / sqlite, geodatabase, mapinfo tab, shapefile, pdf, csv, kmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 20, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    US Department of the Interior (DOI)
    Area covered
    Description

    As described by ASTM D7780-12: This feature class contains polygons that depict the location of coal refuse disposal areas. They include, but are not limited to, slurry impoundments (including cross valley, diked, and incised impoundments), slurry cell structures, and coarse coal refuse structures. This dataset consists of coalmining related features as described by ASTM D7780-12, "Standard Practice for Geospatial Data for Representing Coal Mining Features". These data are gathered using automated processes from participating coalmining regulatory authorities, which are generally state government agencies. The data from the various sources are transformed into common schemas as described by the ASTM Standard above. The resultant feature classes represent seamless information covering the coal producing areas of the United States. Development of these data are ongoing and will become more complete as more cooperating regulatory authorities are added to the GeoMine system.

  7. f

    Surface and Underground Coal Mines in the U.S.

    • geodata.fnai.org
    • data-smpdc.opendata.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Feb 20, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Esri U.S. Federal Datasets (2020). Surface and Underground Coal Mines in the U.S. [Dataset]. https://geodata.fnai.org/datasets/fedmaps::surface-and-underground-coal-mines-in-the-u-s--2/explore
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 20, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Esri U.S. Federal Datasets
    Area covered
    Description

    Surface and Underground Coal Mines in the U.S.This feature layer, utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration (EIA), displays all operating surface and underground coal mines in the U.S. by total production in short tons. Per EIA, "Coal is a combustible black or brownish-black sedimentary rock with a high amount of carbon and hydrocarbons. Coal is classified as a nonrenewable energy source because it takes millions of years to form. Coal contains the energy stored by plants that lived hundreds of millions of years ago in swampy forests."Coal is mainly found in three regions: the Appalachian coal region, the Interior coal region, and the Western coal region (includes the Powder River Basin).The Appalachian coal region includes Alabama, Eastern Kentucky, Maryland, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia.The Interior coal region includes Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, and Western Kentucky.The Western coal region includes Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.Gemini Surface MineData currency: This cached Esri service is checked monthly for updates from its federal source (Coal Mines)Data modification: NoneFor more information, please visit: Coal ExplainedFor feedback: ArcGIScomNationalMaps@esri.comEnergy Information AdministrationPer EIA, "The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) collects, analyzes, and disseminates independent and impartial energy information to promote sound policymaking, efficient markets, and public understanding of energy and its interaction with the economy and the environment."

  8. f

    Comparison of results to new permits.

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 31, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Michael P. Strager; Jacquelyn M. Strager; Jeffrey S. Evans; Judy K. Dunscomb; Brad J. Kreps; Aaron E. Maxwell (2023). Comparison of results to new permits. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128813.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Michael P. Strager; Jacquelyn M. Strager; Jeffrey S. Evans; Judy K. Dunscomb; Brad J. Kreps; Aaron E. Maxwell
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    For Alabama and West Virginia, detailed summary of mine permits with new/recent activity in relation to Random Forests (RF) model results.Comparison of results to new permits.

  9. d

    Data from: Prospect- and Mine-Related Features from U.S. Geological Survey...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.usgs.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Jul 6, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2024). Prospect- and Mine-Related Features from U.S. Geological Survey 7.5- and 15-Minute Topographic Quadrangle Maps of the United States (ver. 10.0, May 2023) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/prospect-and-mine-related-features-from-u-s-geological-survey-7-5-and-15-minute-topographi
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 6, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Version 10.0 of these data are part of a larger U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) project to develop an updated geospatial database of mines, mineral deposits, and mineral regions in the United States. Mine and prospect-related symbols, such as those used to represent prospect pits, mines, adits, dumps, tailings, etc., hereafter referred to as “mine” symbols or features, have been digitized from the 7.5-minute (1:24,000, 1:25,000-scale; and 1:10,000, 1:20,000 and 1:30,000-scale in Puerto Rico only) and the 15-minute (1:48,000 and 1:62,500-scale; 1:63,360-scale in Alaska only) archive of the USGS Historical Topographic Map Collection (HTMC), or acquired from available databases (California and Nevada, 1:24,000-scale only). Compilation of these features is the first phase in capturing accurate locations and general information about features related to mineral resource exploration and extraction across the U.S. The compilation of 725,690 point and polygon mine symbols from approximately 106,350 maps across 50 states, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (PR) and the District of Columbia (DC) has been completed: Alabama (AL), Alaska (AK), Arizona (AZ), Arkansas (AR), California (CA), Colorado (CO), Connecticut (CT), Delaware (DE), Florida (FL), Georgia (GA), Hawaii (HI), Idaho (ID), Illinois (IL), Indiana (IN), Iowa (IA), Kansas (KS), Kentucky (KY), Louisiana (LA), Maine (ME), Maryland (MD), Massachusetts (MA), Michigan (MI), Minnesota (MN), Mississippi (MS), Missouri (MO), Montana (MT), Nebraska (NE), Nevada (NV), New Hampshire (NH), New Jersey (NJ), New Mexico (NM), New York (NY), North Carolina (NC), North Dakota (ND), Ohio (OH), Oklahoma (OK), Oregon (OR), Pennsylvania (PA), Rhode Island (RI), South Carolina (SC), South Dakota (SD), Tennessee (TN), Texas (TX), Utah (UT), Vermont (VT), Virginia (VA), Washington (WA), West Virginia (WV), Wisconsin (WI), and Wyoming (WY). The process renders not only a more complete picture of exploration and mining in the U.S., but an approximate timeline of when these activities occurred. These data may be used for land use planning, assessing abandoned mine lands and mine-related environmental impacts, assessing the value of mineral resources from Federal, State and private lands, and mapping mineralized areas and systems for input into the land management process. These data are presented as three groups of layers based on the scale of the source maps. No reconciliation between the data groups was done.

  10. u

    USGS Topographic Mine-related Symbols

    • colorado-river-portal.usgs.gov
    • hub.arcgis.com
    • +3more
    Updated Aug 4, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2016). USGS Topographic Mine-related Symbols [Dataset]. https://colorado-river-portal.usgs.gov/datasets/625k-points
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 4, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Area covered
    Description

    Version 10.0 (Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico added) of these data are part of a larger U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) project to develop an updated geospatial database of mines, mineral deposits, and mineral regions in the United States. Mine and prospect-related symbols, such as those used to represent prospect pits, mines, adits, dumps, tailings, etc., hereafter referred to as “mine” symbols or features, have been digitized from the 7.5-minute (1:24,000, 1:25,000-scale; and 1:10,000, 1:20,000 and 1:30,000-scale in Puerto Rico only) and the 15-minute (1:48,000 and 1:62,500-scale; 1:63,360-scale in Alaska only) archive of the USGS Historical Topographic Map Collection (HTMC), or acquired from available databases (California and Nevada, 1:24,000-scale only). Compilation of these features is the first phase in capturing accurate locations and general information about features related to mineral resource exploration and extraction across the U.S. The compilation of 725,690 point and polygon mine symbols from approximately 106,350 maps across 50 states, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (PR) and the District of Columbia (DC) has been completed: Alabama (AL), Alaska (AK), Arizona (AZ), Arkansas (AR), California (CA), Colorado (CO), Connecticut (CT), Delaware (DE), Florida (FL), Georgia (GA), Hawaii (HI), Idaho (ID), Illinois (IL), Indiana (IN), Iowa (IA), Kansas (KS), Kentucky (KY), Louisiana (LA), Maine (ME), Maryland (MD), Massachusetts (MA), Michigan (MI), Minnesota (MN), Mississippi (MS), Missouri (MO), Montana (MT), Nebraska (NE), Nevada (NV), New Hampshire (NH), New Jersey (NJ), New Mexico (NM), New York (NY), North Carolina (NC), North Dakota (ND), Ohio (OH), Oklahoma (OK), Oregon (OR), Pennsylvania (PA), Rhode Island (RI), South Carolina (SC), South Dakota (SD), Tennessee (TN), Texas (TX), Utah (UT), Vermont (VT), Virginia (VA), Washington (WA), West Virginia (WV), Wisconsin (WI), and Wyoming (WY). The process renders not only a more complete picture of exploration and mining in the U.S., but an approximate timeline of when these activities occurred. These data may be used for land use planning, assessing abandoned mine lands and mine-related environmental impacts, assessing the value of mineral resources from Federal, State and private lands, and mapping mineralized areas and systems for input into the land management process. These data are presented as three groups of layers based on the scale of the source maps. No reconciliation between the data groups was done.Datasets were developed by the U.S. Geological Survey Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center (GGGSC). Compilation work was completed by USGS National Association of Geoscience Teachers (NAGT) interns: Emma L. Boardman-Larson, Grayce M. Gibbs, William R. Gnesda, Montana E. Hauke, Jacob D. Melendez, Amanda L. Ringer, and Alex J. Schwarz; USGS student contractors: Margaret B. Hammond, Germán Schmeda, Patrick C. Scott, Tyler Reyes, Morgan Mullins, Thomas Carroll, Margaret Brantley, and Logan Barrett; and by USGS personnel Virgil S. Alfred, Damon Bickerstaff, E.G. Boyce, Madelyn E. Eysel, Stuart A. Giles, Autumn L. Helfrich, Alan A. Hurlbert, Cheryl L. Novakovich, Sophia J. Pinter, and Andrew F. Smith.USMIN project website: https://www.usgs.gov/USMIN

  11. Coal Mines

    • chesapeake-conservation-atlas-chescon.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Mar 26, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Chesapeake Conservancy (2018). Coal Mines [Dataset]. https://chesapeake-conservation-atlas-chescon.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/coal-mines
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 26, 2018
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Chesapeake Conservancyhttps://www.chesapeakeconservancy.org/
    Area covered
    Description

    SourceChesapeake Conservation PartnershipLocationPennsylvania, New York, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia.DescriptionEnergy is a vital input to supporting our way of life. Yet, energy production and transmission also have the potential to adversely impact values we treasure. Harmonizing our needs with our values requires solid understanding of both conservation goals and existing and proposed energy infrastructure.The map depicts known data related to energy production and infrastructure.Creating the map included acquiring and displaying data on the full range of energy production -- from geologic potential, to areas of resource extraction, energy production, and transmission including both renewable energy and fossil fuels.The map also shows proposed and potential energy projects including potential fracking sites, proposed gas storage sites, proposed gas pipelines, and proposed electric transmission lines.All data is compiled from publicly available sources including the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), the Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data, state agencies, and non-governmental organizations.In particular, data on potential and proposed projects come from a variety of sources, including non-governmental organizations tracking these projects, agencies regulating the projects and utilities proposing them. This dataset will be the most difficult to keep current across six states with many different entities in charge of the various projects.How you might make use of this data layerThis dataset shares the locations of energy resources and infrastructure. This information may be useful in understanding how infrastructure may influence land conservation and stewardship.How to get more informationFor more information about the Chesapeake Conservation Partnership contact: John Griffin, Program Manager, jgriffin@chesapeakeconservation.org

  12. a

    South Fork Cherry River Water Quality

    • conservation-abra.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Feb 22, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Allegheny-Blue Ridge Alliance (2023). South Fork Cherry River Water Quality [Dataset]. https://conservation-abra.hub.arcgis.com/maps/abra::south-fork-cherry-river-water-quality
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 22, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Allegheny-Blue Ridge Alliance
    Area covered
    Description

    Purpose:This feature layer describes water quality sampling data performed at several operating coal mines in the South Fork of Cherry watershed, West Virginia.Source & Data:Data was downloaded from WV Department of Environmental Protection's ApplicationXtender online database and EPA's ECHO online database between January and April, 2023.There are five data sets here: Surface Water Monitoring Sites, which contains basic information about monitoring sites (name, lat/long, etc.) and NPDES Outlet Monitoring Sites, which contains similar information about outfall discharges surrounding the active mines. Biological Assessment Stations (BAS) contain similar information for pre-project biological sampling. NOV Summary contains locations of Notices of Violation received by South Fork Coal Company from WV Department of Environmental Protection. The Quarterly Monitoring Reports table contains the sampling data for the Surface Water Monitoring Sites, which actually goes as far back as 2018 for some mines. Parameters of concern include iron, aluminum and selenium, among others.A relationship class between Surface Water Monitoring Sites and the Quarterly Monitoring Reports allows access to individual sample results.Processing:Notices of Violation were obtained from the WV DEP AppXtender database for Mining and Reclamation Article 3 (SMCRA) Permitting, and Mining and Reclamation NPDES Permitting. Violation data were entered into Excel and loaded into ArcGIS Pro as a CSV text file with Lat/Long coordinates for each Violation. The CSV file was converted to a point feature class.Water quality data were downloaded in PDF format from the WVDEP AppXtender website. Non-searchable PDFs were converted via Optical Character Recognition, so that data could be copied. Sample results were copied and pasted manually to Notepad++, and several columns were re-ordered. Data was grouped by sample station and sorted chronologically. Sample data, contained in the associated table (SW_QM_Reports) were linked back to the monitoring station locations using the Station_ID text field in a geodatabase relationship class.Water monitoring station locations were taken from published Drainage Maps and from water quality reports. A CSV table was created with station Lat/Long locations and loaded into ArcGIS Pro. It was then converted to a point feature class.Stream Crossings and Road Construction Areas were digitized as polygon feature classes from project Drainage and Progress maps that were converted to TIFF image format from PDF and georeferenced.The ArcGIS Pro map - South Fork Cherry River Water Quality, was published as a service definition to ArcGIS Online.Symbology:NOV Summary - dark blue, solid pointLost Flats Surface Water Monitoring Sites: Data Available - medium blue point, black outlineLost Flats Surface Water Monitoring Sites: No Data Available - no-fill point, thick medium blue outlineLost Flats NPDES Outlet Monitoring Sites - orange point, black outlineBlue Knob Surface Water Monitoring Sites: Data Available - medium blue point, black outlineBlue Knob Surface Water Monitoring Sites: No Data Available - no-fill point, thick medium blue outlineBlue Knob NPDES Outlet Monitoring Sites - orange point, black outlineBlue Knob Biological Assessment Stations: Data Available - medium green point, black outlineBlue Knob Biological Assessment Stations: No Data Available - no-fill point, thick medium green outlineRocky Run Surface Water Monitoring Sites: Data Available - medium blue point, black outlineRocky Run Surface Water Monitoring Sites: No Data Available - no-fill point, thick medium blue outlineRocky Run NPDES Outlet Monitoring Sites - orange point, black outlineRocky Run Biological Assessment Stations: Data Available - medium green point, black outlineRocky Run Biological Assessment Stations: No Data Available - no-fill point, thick medium green outlineRocky Run Stream Crossings: turquoise blue polygon with red outlineRocky Run Haul Road Construction Areas: dark red (40% transparent) polygon with black outlineHaul Road No 2 Surface Water Monitoring Sites: Data Available - medium blue point, black outlineHaul Road No 2 Surface Water Monitoring Sites: No Data Available - no-fill point, thick medium blue outlineHaul Road No 2 NPDES Outlet Monitoring Sites - orange point, black outline

  13. d

    Mineral Resources Data System

    • search.dataone.org
    • data.wu.ac.at
    Updated Oct 29, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2016). Mineral Resources Data System [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/3e55bd49-a016-4172-ad78-7292618a08c2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 29, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    USGS Science Data Catalog
    Authors
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    ORE, REF, ADMIN, MODEL, STATE, COUNTY, DEP_ID, GANGUE, MAS_ID, REGION, and 29 more
    Description

    Mineral resource occurrence data covering the world, most thoroughly within the U.S. This database contains the records previously provided in the Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS) of USGS and the Mineral Availability System/Mineral Industry Locator System (MAS/MILS) originated in the U.S. Bureau of Mines, which is now part of USGS. The MRDS is a large and complex relational database developed over several decades by hundreds of researchers and reporters. While database records describe mineral resources worldwide, the compilation of information was intended to cover the United States completely, and its coverage of resources in other countries is incomplete. The content of MRDS records was drawn from reports previously published or made available to USGS researchers. Some of those original source materials are no longer available. The information contained in MRDS was intended to reflect the reports used as sources and is current only as of the date of those source reports. Consequently MRDS does not reflect up-to-date changes to the operating status of mines, ownership, land status, production figures and estimates of reserves and resources, or the nature, size, and extent of workings. Information on the geological characteristics of the mineral resource are likely to remain correct, but aspects involving human activity are likely to be out of date.

  14. a

    Point minelands

    • umn.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Sep 13, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    University of Minnesota (2023). Point minelands [Dataset]. https://umn.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/UMN::tctac-gdb?layer=0
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 13, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    University of Minnesota
    Area covered
    Description

    Version 10.0 of these data are part of a larger U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) project to develop an updated geospatial database of mines, mineral deposits, and mineral regions in the United States. Mine and prospect-related symbols, such as those used to represent prospect pits, mines, adits, dumps, tailings, etc., hereafter referred to as “mine” symbols or features, have been digitized from the 7.5-minute (1:24,000, 1:25,000-scale; and 1:10,000, 1:20,000 and 1:30,000-scale in Puerto Rico only) and the 15-minute (1:48,000 and 1:62,500-scale; 1:63,360-scale in Alaska only) archive of the USGS Historical Topographic Map Collection (HTMC), or acquired from available databases (California and Nevada, 1:24,000-scale only). Compilation of these features is the first phase in capturing accurate locations and general information about features related to mineral resource exploration and extraction across the U.S. The compilation of 725,690 point and polygon mine symbols from approximately 106,350 maps across 50 states, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (PR) and the District of Columbia (DC) has been completed: Alabama (AL), Alaska (AK), Arizona (AZ), Arkansas (AR), California (CA), Colorado (CO), Connecticut (CT), Delaware (DE), Florida (FL), Georgia (GA), Hawaii (HI), Idaho (ID), Illinois (IL), Indiana (IN), Iowa (IA), Kansas (KS), Kentucky (KY), Louisiana (LA), Maine (ME), Maryland (MD), Massachusetts (MA), Michigan (MI), Minnesota (MN), Mississippi (MS), Missouri (MO), Montana (MT), Nebraska (NE), Nevada (NV), New Hampshire (NH), New Jersey (NJ), New Mexico (NM), New York (NY), North Carolina (NC), North Dakota (ND), Ohio (OH), Oklahoma (OK), Oregon (OR), Pennsylvania (PA), Rhode Island (RI), South Carolina (SC), South Dakota (SD), Tennessee (TN), Texas (TX), Utah (UT), Vermont (VT), Virginia (VA), Washington (WA), West Virginia (WV), Wisconsin (WI), and Wyoming (WY). The process renders not only a more complete picture of exploration and mining in the U.S., but an approximate timeline of when these activities occurred. These data may be used for land use planning, assessing abandoned mine lands and mine-related environmental impacts, assessing the value of mineral resources from Federal, State and private lands, and mapping mineralized areas and systems for input into the land management process. These data are presented as three groups of layers based on the scale of the source maps. No reconciliation between the data groups was done.
    Additional metadata

  15. a

    48k Points

    • crb-open-data-usgs.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Aug 4, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2016). 48k Points [Dataset]. https://crb-open-data-usgs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/48k-points
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 4, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Area covered
    Description

    Version 10.0 of these data are part of a larger U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) project to develop an updated geospatial database of mines, mineral deposits, and mineral regions in the United States. Mine and prospect-related symbols, such as those used to represent prospect pits, mines, adits, dumps, tailings, etc., hereafter referred to as “mine” symbols or features, have been digitized from the 7.5-minute (1:24,000, 1:25,000-scale; and 1:10,000, 1:20,000 and 1:30,000-scale in Puerto Rico only) and the 15-minute (1:48,000 and 1:62,500-scale; 1:63,360-scale in Alaska only) archive of the USGS Historical Topographic Map Collection (HTMC), or acquired from available databases (California and Nevada, 1:24,000-scale only). Compilation of these features is the first phase in capturing accurate locations and general information about features related to mineral resource exploration and extraction across the U.S. The compilation of 725,690 point and polygon mine symbols from approximately 106,350 maps across 50 states, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (PR) and the District of Columbia (DC) has been completed: Alabama (AL), Alaska (AK), Arizona (AZ), Arkansas (AR), California (CA), Colorado (CO), Connecticut (CT), Delaware (DE), Florida (FL), Georgia (GA), Hawaii (HI), Idaho (ID), Illinois (IL), Indiana (IN), Iowa (IA), Kansas (KS), Kentucky (KY), Louisiana (LA), Maine (ME), Maryland (MD), Massachusetts (MA), Michigan (MI), Minnesota (MN), Mississippi (MS), Missouri (MO), Montana (MT), Nebraska (NE), Nevada (NV), New Hampshire (NH), New Jersey (NJ), New Mexico (NM), New York (NY), North Carolina (NC), North Dakota (ND), Ohio (OH), Oklahoma (OK), Oregon (OR), Pennsylvania (PA), Rhode Island (RI), South Carolina (SC), South Dakota (SD), Tennessee (TN), Texas (TX), Utah (UT), Vermont (VT), Virginia (VA), Washington (WA), West Virginia (WV), Wisconsin (WI), and Wyoming (WY). The process renders not only a more complete picture of exploration and mining in the U.S., but an approximate timeline of when these activities occurred. These data may be used for land use planning, assessing abandoned mine lands and mine-related environmental impacts, assessing the value of mineral resources from Federal, State and private lands, and mapping mineralized areas and systems for input into the land management process. These data are presented as three groups of layers based on the scale of the source maps. No reconciliation between the data groups was done.

  16. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Mitchell Mcadoo; Mark Kozar (2024). Point Locations of Abandoned Underground Coal Mine Aquifer Water-Quality Sites in West Virginia, 1973 through 2016 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5066/F7TM78C5

Point Locations of Abandoned Underground Coal Mine Aquifer Water-Quality Sites in West Virginia, 1973 through 2016

Explore at:
2 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Jul 11, 2024
Dataset provided by
United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
Authors
Mitchell Mcadoo; Mark Kozar
License

U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically

Time period covered
Jul 13, 1973 - Sep 7, 2016
Area covered
West Virginia
Description

This data-file represents point locations of sites that are associated with water-quality data from abandoned underground coal mine aquifers in West Virginia. It is intended to act as a geographic representation of the locational data from the associated Data Release titled Site and Groundwater-Quality Sample Data for Abandoned Underground Coal Mine Aquifers in West Virginia, July 13, 1973 through September 7, 2016. The first two rows of this file should be used as header information. Also included on this page is a .zip file which contains a shapefile for geospatial representation of the data. These files have specific site-data and attributes that are described in their metadata xml files.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu