This dataset (2012-2020) is a compilation of the Land Use/Land Cover datasets created by the 5 Water Management Districts in Florida based on imagery -- North West Florida Water Management District (NWFWMD) 2019, Suwannee River Water Management District (SRWMD) 2019-2020, St. John's River Water Management District (SJRWMD) 2013-2016, 2013 (Dec 2012 – Mar 2013) - Duval, Bradford, 2014 (Dec 2013 – Mar 2014) - Alachua, Baker, Clay, Flagler, Lake, Marion, Nassau, Osceola, Polk, Putnam, St. John’s, 2015 (Dec 2014 – Mar 2015) - Brevard, Indian River, Okeechobee, Seminole, Volusia, 2016 (Dec 2015 – Mar 2016) - Orange, South West Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) 2020 and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) 2017-2019. Codes are derived from the Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS-DOT 1999) but may have been altered to accommodate region differences.

This data set represents the extent, approximate location and type of wetlands and deepwater habitats in the United States and its Territories. These data delineate the areal extent of wetlands and surface waters as defined by Cowardin et al. (1979). The National Wetlands Inventory - Version 2, Surface Waters and Wetlands Inventory was derived by retaining the wetland and deepwater polygons that compose the NWI digital wetlands spatial data layer and reintroducing any linear wetland or surface water features that were orphaned from the original NWI hard copy maps by converting them to narrow polygonal features. Additionally, the data are supplemented with hydrography data, buffered to become polygonal features, as a secondary source for any single-line stream features not mapped by the NWI and to complete segmented connections. Wetland mapping conducted in WA, OR, CA, NV and ID after 2012 and most other projects mapped after 2015 were mapped to include all surface water features and are not derived data. The linear hydrography dataset used to derive Version 2 was the U.S. Geological Survey's National Hydrography Dataset (NHD). Specific information on the NHD version used to derive Version 2 and where Version 2 was mapped can be found in the 'comments' field of the Wetlands_Project_Metadata feature class. Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and near shore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery. By policy, the Service also excludes certain types of "farmed wetlands" as may be defined by the Food Security Act or that do not coincide with the Cowardin et al. definition. Contact the Service's Regional Wetland Coordinator for additional information on what types of farmed wetlands are included on wetland maps. This dataset should be used in conjunction with the Wetlands_Project_Metadata layer, which contains project specific wetlands mapping procedures and information on dates, scales and emulsion of imagery used to map the wetlands within specific project boundaries. Please reference the metadata for contact information.

The Functional Wetlands dataset is based on wetlands identified in the Cooperative Land Cover Map v3.3. Functional wetlands are defined as those in a more natural state and the prioritization is based on overlap with a Land Use Intensity index and FNAI Potential Natural Areas. For more information see the Conservation Needs Assessment Technical Report: https://www.fnai.org/conslands/florida-forever. Value 1 = Priority 1 (Highest); Value 2 = Priority 2; Value 3 = Priority 3; Value 4 = Priority 4; Value 5 = Priority 5; Value 6 = Priority 6Data download page

Geospatial data about Pasco County, Florida Wetlands. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

This data set represents the extent, approximate location and type of wetlands and deepwater habitats in the United States and its Territories. These data delineate the areal extent of wetlands and surface waters as defined by Cowardin et al. (1979). The National Wetlands Inventory - Version 2, Surface Waters and Wetlands Inventory was derived by retaining the wetland and deepwater polygons that compose the NWI digital wetlands spatial data layer and reintroducing any linear wetland or surface water features that were orphaned from the original NWI hard copy maps by converting them to narrow polygonal features. Additionally, the data are supplemented with hydrography data, buffered to become polygonal features, as a secondary source for any single-line stream features not mapped by the NWI and to complete segmented connections. Wetland mapping conducted in WA, OR, CA, NV and ID after 2012 and most other projects mapped after 2015 were mapped to include all surface water features and are not derived data. The linear hydrography dataset used to derive Version 2 was the U.S. Geological Survey's National Hydrography Dataset (NHD). Specific information on the NHD version used to derive Version 2 and where Version 2 was mapped can be found in the 'comments' field of the Wetlands_Project_Metadata feature class. Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and near shore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery. By policy, the Service also excludes certain types of "farmed wetlands" as may be defined by the Food Security Act or that do not coincide with the Cowardin et al. definition. Contact the Service's Regional Wetland Coordinator for additional information on what types of farmed wetlands are included on wetland maps. This dataset should be used in conjunction with the Wetlands_Project_Metadata layer, which contains project specific wetlands mapping procedures and information on dates, scales and emulsion of imagery used to map the wetlands within specific project boundaries. Please reference the metadata for contact information.

Geospatial data about St Lucie County, Florida National Wetlands Inventory. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

A hierarchical vegetation classification model (10 m resolution) was developed for southwest Florida wetlands using a fusion of multispectral and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) remotely sensed imagery. Sentinel-1 and 2 imagery were obtained from Dec 2015-Sept 2017, split into wet and dry seasons, and processed for a range of vegetation and multi-temporal indices for a total of 26 predictor layers. Training datasets included polygons developed from field surveys and high resolution imagery collected from 2010 - 2018. The domain was first split into estuarine and interior wetlands, then an open water, forest, or grassland model (high level) was developed for each wetland type. Finally, classification model that included species and community-level classes (fine level) was created. Mean overall accuracy was 0.90 and 0.80 for the high and low level models, respectively.

Domestic wastewater facilities that are permitted for wastewater to wetland discharge in Florida. These facilities are regulated by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Domestic Wastewater Program. This data is intended to be used for general informational and planning purposes. For questions pertaining to this map, please contact Diana Turner at diana.m.turner@dep.state.fl.us.

This data release includes geospatial data for irregularly flooded wetlands and high marsh and salt pannes/flats along the northern Gulf of Mexico coast from Texas to Florida. Specifically, this release includes seven products: (1) a map highlighting the continuous probability that an area is an irregularly flooded wetland; (2) a map of irregularly flooded wetland probability reclassified into four bins; (3) a map delineating high marsh and salt pannes/flats; (4) a map from Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana to the Florida Big Bend delineating the coverage of irregularly flooded wetlands that have Juncus roemerianus (Black needlerush) as the dominant vegetation species; (5) a spatial metadata file showing what elevation data were used for specific locations; (6) a supplemental version of the high marsh and salt pannes/flats map that has a second class for high marsh for parts of Texas where succulents and Distichlis spicata were dominant species; and (7) a dataset of supplemental project-specific field reference data collected throughout the northern Gulf of Mexico coast. Collectively, the products in this data release were developed using a two-step approach that utilized the best-available elevation data and satellite data from 2018 to 2020. The first step in the process was to create a probabilistic map of irregularly flooded wetlands using light detection and ranging (lidar)-derived digital elevation models (DEMs), tidal datums, and nuisance flooding levels. Monte Carlo simulations were used to propagate uncertainty in elevation-based data, and existing land cover data were used to restrict the output to coastal wetland areas. Due to the focus of this study on high marsh, these coastal wetland areas did not include tidal forested fresh wetlands. The second step was to delineate high marsh and salt pannes/flats using reference data which included project-specific data collection in collaboration with land managers and other ancillary datasets across the northern Gulf of Mexico coast. These data were combined with Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar imagery, multispectral optical satellite imagery from Sentinel-2, DEMs, and the irregularly flooded wetland probability layer to generate a contemporary map of high marsh and salt pannes/flats along the northern Gulf of Mexico coast. This product is the first regional map of these wetland systems across the northern Gulf of Mexico coast.

The AHF system has been deployed in a series of survey campaigns to collect over 60,000 points covering Everglades National Park, Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Water Conservation Areas 2 and 3, portions of Big Cypress National Preserve, as well as areas along the Lake Okeechobee littoral zone. Since the AHF System is able to penetrate Everglades vegetation and water cover, it has provided an unprecedented regional view of Everglades topographic gradients and sub-water surface structure. These data are now being used to simulate Everglades water flow with higher resolution and greater accuracy, to estimate water depths in real-time for field study planning, and as input for habitat models used to forecast the effects of water level changes on various important species. The elevation data collected through this project also formed the basic input to generate a regional topographic surface that is the basis for the Everglades Depth Estimation Network (EDEN). These high accuracy elevation data are made available to anyone through the South Florida Information Access website (http://sofia.usgs.gov) data exchange pages.

MAP Activity Accomplishment The USGS Airborne Height Finder (AHF) System was used to perform topographic surveys in Water Conservation Area 3A within the extents of the Lone Palm Head and North of Lone Palm Head 7.5-minute topographic map quadrangles as specified in the MAP/COE Interagency Agreement. The AHF system has been used throughout South Florida for elevation data collection because traditional surveying methods are too difficult, too costly, or simply impossible to use in the harsh wetland environment and broadly inaccessible terrain of the Florida Everglades. This is especially true considering the shear size of the hydrodynamic and biological modeling domains. The AHF is a helicopter-based instrument that uses a GPS receiver, a computer, and a mechanized plumb bob to make measurements. These data were post processed to the reference stations that are part of the AHF geodetic control network. For reasons of accuracy, these reference stations are located no more then 15 kilometers from the helicopter during AHF operations. The GPS data were post processed using Ashtech’s PNAV On The Fly (OTF) software to obtain the trajectory of the AHF platform. These results are then processed through an in-house software package that separates the actual survey points and results from the trajectory. The points are manually checked to ensure data accuracy and completeness. Digital elevation models (DEMs) were then generated from the elevation point data. Existing elevation data derived from LiDAR data for this area were replaced with AHF derived DEMs for reasons of vertical accuracy. The DEMs have been posted on the South Florida Information Access (SOFIA) website: http://sofia.usgs.gov/exchange/desmond/desmondelev.html.

Vegetation mapping will monitor the spatial extent, pattern, and proportion of plant communities within major landscape regions of the Greater Everglades Wetlands. Specific landscape changes to be monitored that pertain to the CERP include the following: · Changes in the extent and orientation of sloughs, tree islands, and sawgrass ridges as flow patterns, flow volumes, hydroperiods, and water quality are modified in the ridge and slough landscape · Changes in the extent and distribution of cattail as flow patterns, flow volumes, hydroperiods, and water quality are modified in the ridge and slough landscape · Changes in the extent and distribution of exotic plant communities · Changes in the distribution and configuration of tidal creeks, salt marshes, and mangrove forests as changing flow patterns and volumes interact with sea level and salinity in the mangrove estuaries of Florida Bay and the Gulf of Mexico · Changes in the distribution of plant communities in calcitic wetlands, including tussock-forming Muhlenbergia and sawgrass communities in the major breeding locations of the Cape Sable seaside sparrow, as hydrologic gradients change · Changes in the distribution of plant communities of eastern Big Cypress with the removal of L-28 and hydroperiod restoration in the Kissimmee Billy Strand Regional landscape patterns will be monitored using a combination of a transect and sentinel site sampling design (Section 3.1.3.1) and a stratified random sampling design (Section 3.1.3.10). Aerial photo-interpretation is currently the best tool available to produce dependable and accurate maps of the Everglades (Welch et al. 1995, Doren et al. 1999, Rutchey and Vilchek 1999, Richardson and Harris 1995). Aerial photography of the greater Everglades wetland system at a scale of 1/24,000 will be purchased at three-year intervals. Photography will be interpreted and ground-truthed to produce vegetation maps at three-year intervals for the randomly selected cells. Additional cells will be mapped to supplement the stratified random cells along the alignments of the coastal, marl prairie -slough, and WCA gradients that are described above. The vegetation classification scheme of Jones et al. (unpublished report) will be used to identify major plant communities that are defined by typical dominant species.

This project consists of 5 files, a ReadMe (text) and four geospatial shapefiles generated in ArcPro 3.0.4. (ESRI). Two shapefiles depict the distribution and spatial extent of artificial water features (AWFs, e.g., reservoirs, stormwater retention ponds) in the 1950s and in 2007 in the Tampa Bay Watershed. The other two depict the distribution and spatial extent of wetlands in the 1950s and in 2007 in the Tampa Bay Watershed. We used a combination of heads-up digitizing (while observing 1950s aerial black and white aerial imagery) and reference to ancillary datasets to map wetlands and AWFs in the 1950s. We based the wetlands 2007 map off the land use land cover dataset published by SWFWMD (2008). We similarly based the 2007 AWF dataset on the SWFWMD LULC dataset but additionally digitized AWF features while referencing aerial imagery and products supplied by the Mosaic Company.Additional method descriptions can be found in Rains et al. 2013 (wetland datasets, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13157-013-0455-4) and in Rains et al. (2023) titled Reorganizing the waterscape: asymmetric loss of wetlands and gain of artificial water features in a mixed-use watershed (AWF and change datasets). We initially developed the two wetland datasets, in collaboration with the Balmoral Group, to support a wetland area change analysis in the Tampa Bay Watershed. We subsequently used these datasets in our present work (Rains et al. 2023) to analyze change in wetland distribution, configuration, and geometry (e.g., perimeter length). The wetland datasets are not meant as a map of jurisdictional wetlands.

FEMA Flood ZonesFlorida Wetlands

This data set serves as documentation of land cover and land use (LCLU) within the South Florida Water Management District as it existed in 2017-19. Land Cover Land Use data was updated from 2014-16 LCLU by photo-interpretation from 2017-19 aerial photography and classified using the SFWMD modified FLUCCS classification system. Features were interpreted from the county-based aerial photography (4 in - 2 ft pixel), see imagery year in the "AERIAL DATE" field. The features were updated on screen from the 2014-16 vector data. Horizontal accuracy of the data corresponds to the positional accuracy of the county aerial photography. The minimum mapping unit for classification was 0.5 acres for wetlands and 5 acres for uplands. This data is partial and is not considered complete until the entire SFWMD has been completed.Photointerpretation Key: https://geoext.geoapps.sfwmd.gov/TPubs/2014_SFWMD_LULC_Photointerpretation_Key.pdf

A series of land use (LU) maps have been produced by the SFWMD since the early 1970s. It was produced by photointerpretation of 1:40,000 USGS NAPP color infrared photography. The work was carried out by multiple contractors, with significant input and review by a community of stakeholders at the District. The contract was managed by the Technical Resources Team (TRT) at SFWMD. The classification system is a modified version of the statewide FLUCCS (Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System) maintained by FDOT. This modified version uses classes that are mainly at the community level, but also includes a number of species of concern. Modifications and corrections have been made to the map since its creation. There is no formal assessment of accuracy parameters for this layer.Please note that there are several polygons that have a "0" FLUCCS code that represent gaps and slivers in the data. These polygons will be corrected during the next round of SFWMD Data Cleanup.

The Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP - www.evergladesplan.org), authorized as part of the Water Resources and Development Act (WRDA) of 2000 (U.S. Congress 2000), is an $US8-10 billion hydrologic restoration project for south Florida. CERP includes 68 separate projects to be managed over the next 30 years by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) is a system-wide program within the CERP to organize and provide scientific and technical support for design, implementation, and assessment of the restoration program. It is the role of RECOVER to develop a system-wide monitoring and assessment plan that will document how well the CERP is meeting its objectives for ecosystem restoration.

Vegetation mapping will be used to document changes in the spatial extent, pattern, and proportion of plant communities within the landscape. This map represents the 2009 baseline land-cover vegetation map of northern Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve..

Ten monitoring stations will be operated and maintained along the southwest coast of ENP, the Everglades wetlands, and along the coastlines of northeastern Florida Bay and northwest Barnes Sound. Data collected at these 10 stations will include water level, velocity, salinity, and temperature. Three stations (Upstream North River, North River, and West Highway Creek) will also include automatic samplers for the collection of water samples and determination of Total Nutrients (TN and TP). These 10 stations will complement information currently being generated through an existing network of 20 hydrologic monitoring stations of on-going USGS projects. By combining data collected from the ten monitoring stations and the existing monitoring network, information will be available across 9 generalized coastal gradients or transects. Data collected at all flow sites will be transmitted in near real time (every 1 or 4 hours) by way of satellite telemetry to the automated data processing system (ADAPS) database in the USGS Center for Water and Restoration Studies (CWRS) in Miami and available for CERP purposes. In addition to data from monitoring stations described above, salinity surveys will be performed along these 9 generalized transects, and these will include salinity, temperature, and GPS data from boat-mounted systems. Surveys will be performed regularly on a quarterly basis and twice following hydrologic events, totaling a maximum of 6 surveys per year.

 The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 2000 authorized the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) as a framework for modifications and operational changes to the Central and Southern Florida Project needed to restore the south Florida ecosystem. Provisions within WRDA 2000 provide for specific authorization for an adaptive assessment and monitoring program. A Monitoring and Assessment Plan (MAP) has been developed as the primary tool to assess the system-wide performance of the CERP by the REstoration, COordination and VERification (RECOVER) program. The MAP presents the monitoring and supporting enhancement of scientific information and technology needed to measure the responses of the South Florida ecosystem. The MAP also presents the system-wide performance measures representative of the natural and human systems found in South Florida that will be evaluated to help determine the success of CERP. These system-wide performance measures address the responses of the South Florida ecosystem that the CERP is explicitly designed to improve, correct, or otherwise directly affect. A separate Performance Measure Documentation Report being prepared by RECOVER provides the scientific, technical, and legal basis for the performance measures. This project is intended to support the Greater Everglades (GE) Wetlands module of the MAP and is directly linked to the monitoring or supporting enhancement component In 2003, CERP MAP funding through the South Florida Water Management District established 10 monitoring stations as part of the Coastal Gradients Network. The purpose of this MAP project with the USACE is to continue operation of these 10 stations for the MAP activities.

Tidal flats are non-vegetated areas of sand or mud protected from wave action and composed primarily of mud transported by tidal channels. An important characteristic of the tidal flat environment is its alternating tidal cycle of submergence and exposure to the atmosphere. This GIS data set was created to show a statewide representation of unvegetated tidal flats, compiled from the best available sources. The sources included individual seagrass mapping studies and National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) data for Florida. The NWI was ERASEd using more recent data sources that showed some areas were indeed vegetated. See Source Information for more details on how each source was used.

For file geodatabase download,Click Here. The South Florida Water Management District (District or SFWMD) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have built six large treatment wetlands, referred to as Stormwater Treatment Wetlands (STAs), in the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) as part of a State and Federal initiative to protect the Everglades (Chimney and Goforth, 2001; Sklar et al., 2005). These treatment wetlands are intended to reduce high phosphorus concentrations in surface runoff coming from the EAA before this water reaches the northern portion of the present-day Everglades, i.e., the Water Conservations Areas. Each STA is subdivided into a number of treatment cells by interior levees. Treatment wetlands reduce the concentration of water-borne pollutants through natural bio-geochemical processes (Kadlec and Wallace, 2009). Wetland biogeochemistry, in turn, is intimately associated with the extent and condition of the wetland’s vegetation community (Reddy and DeLaune, 2009). Because of the important relationship between wetland treatment performance and vegetation, the vegetation communities in the STAs have been monitored throughout their operational histories. This effort was mandated as a condition of STA operating permits and by the Process Development and Engineering section of the District’s Long Term Plan (Burns & McDonnell, 2003). The vegetation communities in the STAs have been monitored using two different approaches: (1) vegetation maps were prepared for each STA based on the spatial distribution of different vegetation types interpreted from aerial photographs and (2) field surveys were conducted at a network of sites within each wetland to catalog plant taxa and assess vegetation areal coverage of the dominant taxa. The field-survey program was initiated as a cost-effective alternative to mapping for characterizing the plant community.For information about the imagery collection access this file: 2012 Imagery Collection in STAsFor details how the data was processed see the Lineage section.

This data set serves as documentation of land cover and land use within the South Florida Water Management District as it existed in 2004-05. Land cover/land use data was photo interpreted from 2004-05 1:12,000 scale CIR, RGB and stereo panchromatic aerial photography and classified using the SFWMD modified FLUCCS classification system. Features were stereoscopically interpreted from the aerial photography and the 1999 vector data was updated on screen over corresponding USGS DOQQ's. Horizontal accuracy of the data corresponds to the positional accuracy of the USGS DOQQ's. The minimum mapping unit for classification was 2 acres for wetlands and 5 acres for uplands.For Zipped File Geodatabase Download:https://sfwmd.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=14314c569b9c4f6e93d76694e2797952