How many people use social media?

              Social media usage is one of the most popular online activities. In 2024, over five billion people were using social media worldwide, a number projected to increase to over six billion in 2028.

              Who uses social media?
              Social networking is one of the most popular digital activities worldwide and it is no surprise that social networking penetration across all regions is constantly increasing. As of January 2023, the global social media usage rate stood at 59 percent. This figure is anticipated to grow as lesser developed digital markets catch up with other regions
              when it comes to infrastructure development and the availability of cheap mobile devices. In fact, most of social media’s global growth is driven by the increasing usage of mobile devices. Mobile-first market Eastern Asia topped the global ranking of mobile social networking penetration, followed by established digital powerhouses such as the Americas and Northern Europe.

              How much time do people spend on social media?
              Social media is an integral part of daily internet usage. On average, internet users spend 151 minutes per day on social media and messaging apps, an increase of 40 minutes since 2015. On average, internet users in Latin America had the highest average time spent per day on social media.

              What are the most popular social media platforms?
              Market leader Facebook was the first social network to surpass one billion registered accounts and currently boasts approximately 2.9 billion monthly active users, making it the most popular social network worldwide. In June 2023, the top social media apps in the Apple App Store included mobile messaging apps WhatsApp and Telegram Messenger, as well as the ever-popular app version of Facebook.

How much time do people spend on social media? As of 2025, the average daily social media usage of internet users worldwide amounted to 141 minutes per day, down from 143 minutes in the previous year. Currently, the country with the most time spent on social media per day is Brazil, with online users spending an average of 3 hours and 49 minutes on social media each day. In comparison, the daily time spent with social media in the U.S. was just 2 hours and 16 minutes. Global social media usageCurrently, the global social network penetration rate is 62.3 percent. Northern Europe had an 81.7 percent social media penetration rate, topping the ranking of global social media usage by region. Eastern and Middle Africa closed the ranking with 10.1 and 9.6 percent usage reach, respectively. People access social media for a variety of reasons. Users like to find funny or entertaining content and enjoy sharing photos and videos with friends, but mainly use social media to stay in touch with current events friends. Global impact of social mediaSocial media has a wide-reaching and significant impact on not only online activities but also offline behavior and life in general. During a global online user survey in February 2019, a significant share of respondents stated that social media had increased their access to information, ease of communication, and freedom of expression. On the flip side, respondents also felt that social media had worsened their personal privacy, increased a polarization in politics and heightened everyday distractions.

1) Data Introduction • The Social Media Usage Dataset(Applications) features patterns and activity indicators that 1,000 users use seven major social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.

2) Data Utilization (1) Social Media Usage Dataset(Applications) has characteristics that: • This dataset provides different social media activity data for each user, including daily usage time, number of posts, number of likes received, and number of new followers. (2) Social Media Usage Dataset(Applications) can be used to: • Analysis of User Participation by Platform: You can analyze participation and popular trends by platform by comparing usage time and activity for each social media. • Establish marketing strategy: Based on user activity data, it can be used for targeted marketing, content production, and user retention strategies.

As of January 2024, #love was the most used hashtag on Instagram, being included in over two billion posts on the social media platform. #Instagood and #instagram were used over one billion times as of early 2024.

During a 2025 survey among marketers worldwide, around 83 percent reported using Facebook for marketing purposes. Instagram and LinkedIn followed, respectively mentioned by 78 and 69 percent of the respondents. The global social media marketing segment According to the same study, 60 percent of responding marketers intended to increase their organic use of YouTube for marketing purposes throughout that year. LinkedIn and Instagram followed with similar shares, rounding up the top three social media platforms attracting a planned growth in organic use among global marketers in 2025. Their main driver is increasing brand exposure and traffic, which led the ranking of benefits of social media marketing worldwide. Social media for B2B marketing Social media platform adoption rates among business-to-consumer (B2C) and business-to-business (B2B) marketers vary according to each subsegment's focus. While B2C professionals prioritize Facebook and Instagram, both run by Meta, Inc., due to their popularity among online audiences, B2B marketers concentrate their endeavors on Microsoft-owned LinkedIn due to its goal to connect people and companies in a corporate context.

Gain valuable insights with our comprehensive Social Media Dataset, designed to help businesses, marketers, and analysts track trends, monitor engagement, and optimize strategies. This dataset provides structured and reliable social media data from multiple platforms.

Dataset Features

User Profiles: Access public social media profiles, including usernames, bios, follower counts, engagement metrics, and more. Ideal for audience analysis, influencer marketing, and competitive research. Posts & Content: Extract posts, captions, hashtags, media (images/videos), timestamps, and engagement metrics such as likes, shares, and comments. Useful for trend analysis, sentiment tracking, and content strategy optimization. Comments & Interactions: Analyze user interactions, including replies, mentions, and discussions. This data helps brands understand audience sentiment and engagement patterns. Hashtag & Trend Tracking: Monitor trending hashtags, topics, and viral content across platforms to stay ahead of industry trends and consumer interests.

Customizable Subsets for Specific Needs Our Social Media Dataset is fully customizable, allowing you to filter data based on platform, region, keywords, engagement levels, or specific user profiles. Whether you need a broad dataset for market research or a focused subset for brand monitoring, we tailor the dataset to your needs.

Popular Use Cases

Brand Monitoring & Reputation Management: Track brand mentions, customer feedback, and sentiment analysis to manage online reputation effectively. Influencer Marketing & Audience Analysis: Identify key influencers, analyze engagement metrics, and optimize influencer partnerships. Competitive Intelligence: Monitor competitor activity, content performance, and audience engagement to refine marketing strategies. Market Research & Consumer Insights: Analyze social media trends, customer preferences, and emerging topics to inform business decisions. AI & Predictive Analytics: Leverage structured social media data for AI-driven trend forecasting, sentiment analysis, and automated content recommendations.

Whether you're tracking brand sentiment, analyzing audience engagement, or monitoring industry trends, our Social Media Dataset provides the structured data you need. Get started today and customize your dataset to fit your business objectives.

The global number of Facebook users was forecast to continuously increase between 2023 and 2027 by in total 391 million users (+14.36 percent). After the fourth consecutive increasing year, the Facebook user base is estimated to reach 3.1 billion users and therefore a new peak in 2027. Notably, the number of Facebook users was continuously increasing over the past years. User figures, shown here regarding the platform Facebook, have been estimated by taking into account company filings or press material, secondary research, app downloads and traffic data. They refer to the average monthly active users over the period and count multiple accounts by persons only once.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to 150 countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).

This database is comprised of 951 participants who provided self-report data online in their school classrooms. The data was collected in 2016 and 2017. The dataset is comprised of 509 males (54%) and 442 females (46%). Their ages ranged from 12 to 16 years (M = 13.69, SD = 0.72). Seven participants did not report their age. The majority were born in Australia (N = 849, 89%). The next most common countries of birth were China (N = 24, 2.5%), the UK (N = 23, 2.4%), and the USA (N = 9, 0.9%). Data were drawn from students at five Australian independent secondary schools. The data contains item responses for the Spence Children’s Anxiety Scale (SCAS; Spence, 1998) which is comprised of 44 items. The Social media question asked about frequency of use with the question “How often do you use social media?”. The response options ranged from constantly to once a week or less. Items measuring Fear of Missing Out were included and incorporated the following five questions based on the APS Stress and Wellbeing in Australia Survey (APS, 2015). These were “When I have a good time it is important for me to share the details online; I am afraid that I will miss out on something if I don’t stay connected to my online social networks; I feel worried and uncomfortable when I can’t access my social media accounts; I find it difficult to relax or sleep after spending time on social networking sites; I feel my brain burnout with the constant connectivity of social media. Internal consistency for this measure was α = .81. Self compassion was measured using the 12-item short-form of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS-SF; Raes et al., 2011). The data set has the option of downloading an excel file (composed of two worksheet tabs) or CSV files 1) Data and 2) Variable labels. References: Australian Psychological Society. (2015). Stress and wellbeing in Australia survey. https://www.headsup.org.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/stress-and-wellbeing-in-australia-report.pdf?sfvrsn=7f08274d_4 Raes, F., Pommier, E., Neff, K. D., & Van Gucht, D. (2011). Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the self-compassion scale. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18(3), 250-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.702 Spence, S. H. (1998). A measure of anxiety symptoms among children. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(5), 545-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00034-5

During a January 2024 global survey among marketers, nearly 60 percent reported plans to increase their organic use of YouTube for marketing purposes in the following 12 months. LinkedIn and Instagram followed, respectively mentioned by 57 and 56 percent of the respondents intending to use them more. According to the same survey, Facebook was the most important social media platform for marketers worldwide.

This dataset consists on 5234 news events obtained from Twitter. The file tweets.csv.gz (available upon request via email to the authors) contains a CSV file, called tweets.csv, with all the tweets IDs corresponding to each event in events.csv. The format of each line of the file is the following:tweet_id, event_idWhere:tweet_id is an long number indicating the Twitter ID of the given tweet. Using the Twitter REST API it is possible to retrieve all the information about the given tweet.event_id corresponds to the event ID of the given tweet. The file events.csv.gz contains a CSV file, called events.csv with all the news events captured from Twitter since August, 2013 until June, 2014. The format of each line of the file is the following:

event_ID,date,total_keywords,total_tweets,keywords

Where:

event_ID is an integer which identifies the corresponding event. There are 5234 events, then event_ID ranges from 1 to 5234. date is the date of the event or connected component. The format is YYYY-MM-DD. total_keywords is an integer indicating how many keywords are in the event or connected component. total_tweets is an integer indicating how many tweets belongs to this event. keywords is a string containing total keywords keywords. There is a semicolon between two keywords.

The files cluster_labels.txt and time_resolutions.txt contain the cluster labels for each event and the time resolutions learned from all events, respectively.

cluster_labels.txt contains one integer number per line, from 0 to 19. In line i, the cluster label in that line corresponds to the event ID number i. time_resolutions.txt contains one floating point number per line, indicating the time resolution learned for all events, in minutes. There are 20 numbers in the file, one per line, in increasing order, with at most 13 decimal numbers after the point.

MultiSocial is a dataset (described in a paper) for multilingual (22 languages) machine-generated text detection benchmark in social-media domain (5 platforms). It contains 472,097 texts, of which about 58k are human-written and approximately the same amount is generated by each of 7 multilingual large language models by using 3 iterations of paraphrasing. The dataset has been anonymized to minimize amount of sensitive data by hiding email addresses, usernames, and phone numbers.

If you use this dataset in any publication, project, tool or in any other form, please, cite the paper.

Disclaimer

Due to data source (described below), the dataset may contain harmful, disinformation, or offensive content. Based on a multilingual toxicity detector, about 8% of the text samples are probably toxic (from 5% in WhatsApp to 10% in Twitter). Although we have used data sources of older date (lower probability to include machine-generated texts), the labeling (of human-written text) might not be 100% accurate. The anonymization procedure might not successfully hiden all the sensitive/personal content; thus, use the data cautiously (if feeling affected by such content, report the found issues in this regard to dpo[at]kinit.sk). The intended use if for non-commercial research purpose only.

Data Source

The human-written part consists of a pseudo-randomly selected subset of social media posts from 6 publicly available datasets:

1. Telegram data originated in Pushshift Telegram, containing 317M messages (Baumgartner et al., 2020). It contains messages from 27k+ channels. The collection started with a set of right-wing extremist and cryptocurrency channels (about 300 in total) and was expanded based on occurrence of forwarded messages from other channels. In the end, it thus contains a wide variety of topics and societal movements reflecting the data collection time.

2. Twitter data originated in CLEF2022-CheckThat! Task 1, containing 34k tweets on COVID-19 and politics (Nakov et al., 2022, combined with Sentiment140, containing 1.6M tweets on various topics (Go et al., 2009).

3. Gab data originated in the dataset containing 22M posts from Gab social network. The authors of the dataset (Zannettou et al., 2018) found out that “Gab is predominantly used for the dissemination and discussion of news and world events, and that it attracts alt-right users, conspiracy theorists, and other trolls.” They also found out that hate speech is much more prevalent there compared to Twitter, but lower than 4chan's Politically Incorrect board.

4. Discord data originated in Discord-Data, containing 51M messages. This is a long-context, anonymized, clean, multi-turn and single-turn conversational dataset based on Discord data scraped from a large variety of servers, big and small. According to the dataset authors, it contains around 0.1% of potentially toxic comments (based on the applied heuristic/classifier).

5. WhatsApp data originated in whatsapp-public-groups, containing 300k messages (Garimella & Tyson, 2018). The public dataset contains the anonymised data, collected for around 5 months from around 178 groups. Original messages were made available to us on request to dataset authors for research purposes.

From these datasets, we have pseudo-randomly sampled up to 1300 texts (up to 300 for test split and the remaining up to 1000 for train split if available) for each of the selected 22 languages (using a combination of automated approaches to detect the language) and platform. This process resulted in 61,592 human-written texts, which were further filtered out based on occurrence of some characters or their length, resulting in about 58k human-written texts.

The machine-generated part contains texts generated by 7 LLMs (Aya-101, Gemini-1.0-pro, GPT-3.5-Turbo-0125, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2, opt-iml-max-30b, v5-Eagle-7B-HF, vicuna-13b). All these models were self-hosted except for GPT and Gemini, where we used the publicly available APIs. We generated the texts using 3 paraphrases of the original human-written data and then preprocessed the generated texts (filtered out cases when the generation obviously failed).

The dataset has the following fields:

• 'text' - a text sample,

• 'label' - 0 for human-written text, 1 for machine-generated text,

• 'multi_label' - a string representing a large language model that generated the text or the string "human" representing a human-written text,

• 'split' - a string identifying train or test split of the dataset for the purpose of training and evaluation respectively,

• 'language' - the ISO 639-1 language code identifying the detected language of the given text,

• 'length' - word count of the given text,

• 'source' - a string identifying the source dataset / platform of the given text,

• 'potential_noise' - 0 for text without identified noise, 1 for text with potential noise.

ToDo Statistics (under construction)

This dataset provides comprehensive social media profile links discovered through real-time web search. It includes profiles from major social networks like Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, Youtube, Pinterest, Github and more. The data is gathered through intelligent search algorithms and pattern matching. Users can leverage this dataset for social media research, influencer discovery, social presence analysis, and social media marketing. The API enables efficient discovery of social profiles across multiple platforms. The dataset is delivered in a JSON format via REST API.

During a 2024 survey, 77 percent of respondents from Nigeria stated that they used social media as a source of news. In comparison, just 23 percent of Japanese respondents said the same. Large portions of social media users around the world admit that they do not trust social platforms either as media sources or as a way to get news, and yet they continue to access such networks on a daily basis.

              Social media: trust and consumption

              Despite the majority of adults surveyed in each country reporting that they used social networks to keep up to date with news and current affairs, a 2018 study showed that social media is the least trusted news source in the world. Less than 35 percent of adults in Europe considered social networks to be trustworthy in this respect, yet more than 50 percent of adults in Portugal, Poland, Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria, Slovakia and Croatia said that they got their news on social media.

              What is clear is that we live in an era where social media is such an enormous part of daily life that consumers will still use it in spite of their doubts or reservations. Concerns about fake news and propaganda on social media have not stopped billions of users accessing their favorite networks on a daily basis.
              Most Millennials in the United States use social media for news every day, and younger consumers in European countries are much more likely to use social networks for national political news than their older peers.
              Like it or not, reading news on social is fast becoming the norm for younger generations, and this form of news consumption will likely increase further regardless of whether consumers fully trust their chosen network or not.

TrueFace is a first dataset of social media processed real and synthetic faces, obtained by the successful StyleGAN generative models, and shared on Facebook, Twitter and Telegram.

Images have historically been a universal and cross-cultural communication medium, capable of reaching people of any social background, status or education. Unsurprisingly though, their social impact has often been exploited for malicious purposes, like spreading misinformation and manipulating public opinion. With today's technologies, the possibility to generate highly realistic fakes is within everyone's reach. A major threat derives in particular from the use of synthetically generated faces, which are able to deceive even the most experienced observer. To contrast this fake news phenomenon, researchers have employed artificial intelligence to detect synthetic images by analysing patterns and artifacts introduced by the generative models. However, most online images are subject to repeated sharing operations by social media platforms. Said platforms process uploaded images by applying operations (like compression) that progressively degrade those useful forensic traces, compromising the effectiveness of the developed detectors. To solve the synthetic-vs-real problem "in the wild", more realistic image databases, like TrueFace, are needed to train specialised detectors.

This dataset covers aspects of online politics in 25 democracies: 15 relatively old established European democracies (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom); five non-European veteran democracies (Australia, Canada, Israel, Japan, New Zealand); two early (Portugal, Spain) and three late (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland) third-wave (young) European democracies. The research population includes, in each country, parties that won 4% or more of the votes in two consecutive elections before April 2019 (a total of 141 parties and 145 leaders). The dataset includes external party level information such as performance in the last national elections, governmental status, party age, populism affiliation and leadership selection method. It also includes information related to the party leaders such as their term in leadership office and other formal positions. In addition it includes information about online activity mainly on the consumption (user related activities) of the parties and their leaders in Facebook and Twitter two of the most used social media platforms for political purposes.

Pinning down the role of social ties in the decision to protest has been notoriously elusive, largely due to data limitations. Social media and their global use by protesters offer an unprecedented opportunity to observe real-time social ties and online behavior, though often without an attendant measure of real-world behavior. We collect data on Twitter activity during the 2015 Charlie Hebdo protest in Paris which, unusually, record real-world protest attendance and network structure measured beyond egocentric networks. We devise a test of social theories of protest that hold that participation depends on exposure to others’ intentions and network position determines exposure. Our findings are strongly consistent with these theories, showing that protesters are significantly more connected to one another via direct, indirect, triadic, and reciprocated ties than comparable non-protesters. These results offer the first large-scale empirical support for the claim that social network structure has consequences for protest participation. The data were collected by the NYU Social Media and Political Participation (SMaPP) laboratory (https://wp.nyu.edu/smapp/), of which Nagler and Tucker are co-Directors along with Richard Bonneau and John T. Jost. The SMaPP lab is supported by the INSPIRE program of the National Science Foundation (Award SES-1248077), the New York University Global Institute for Advanced Study, the Moore-Sloan Data Science Environment, and Dean Thomas Carew’s Research Investment Fund at New York University. In order to run the replication end-to-end, we recommend downloading the comprehensive archive (charlie-hebdo-replication.tar.gz). The archive contains all the files with the appropriate directory structure. Once the archive is expanded, the full replication pipeline may be executed by running the script run-all.sh in the scripts directory.

Researcher(s): Alexandros Mokas, Eleni Kamateri

Supervisor: Ioannis Tsampoulatidis

This repository contains 3 social media datasets:

2 Post-processing datasets: These datasets contain post-processing data extracted from the analysis of social media posts collected for two different use cases during the first two years of the Deepcube project. More specifically, these include:

• The UC2 dataset containing the post-processing analysis of the Twitter data collected for the DeepCube use case (UC2) dealing with the climate induced migration in Africa. This dataset contains in total 5,695,253 social media posts collected from the Twitter platform, based on the initial version of search criteria relevant to UC2 defined by Universitat De Valencia, focused on the regions of Ethiopia and Somalia and started from 26 June, 2021 till March, 2023.
• The UC5 dataset containing the post-processing analysis of the Twitter and Instagram data collected for the DeepCube use case (UC5) related to the sustainable and environmentally-friendly tourism. This dataset contains in total 58,143 social media posts collected from the Twitter and Instagram platform (12,881 collected from Twitter and 45,262 collected from Instagram), based on the initial version of search criteria relevant to UC5 defined by MURMURATION SAS, focused on the regions of Brasil and started from 26 June, 2021 till March, 2023.

1 Annotated dataset: An additional anottated dataset was created that contains post-processing data along with annotations of Twitter posts collected for UC2 for the years 2010-2022. More specifically, it includes:

• The UC2 dataset contain the post-processing of the Twitter data collected for the DeepCube use case (UC2) dealing with the climate induced migration in Africa. This dataset contains in total 1721 annotated (412 relevant and 1309 irrelevant) by social media posts collected from the Twitter platform, focused on the region of Somalia and started from 1 January, 2010 till 31 December, 2022.

For every social media post retrieved from Twitter and Instagram, a preprocessing step was performed. This involved a three-step analysis of each post using the appropriate web service. First, the location of the post was automatically extracted from the text using a location extraction service. Second, the images included in the post were analyzed using a concept extraction service, which identified and provided the top ten concepts that best described the image. These concepts included items such as "person," "building," "drought," "sun," and so on. Finally, the sentiment expressed in the post's text was determined by using a sentiment analysis service. The sentiment was classified as either positive, negative, or neutral.

After the social media posts were preprocessed, they were visualized using the Social Media Web Application. This intuitive, user-friendly online application was designed for both expert and non-expert users and offers a web-based user interface for filtering and visualizing the collected social media data. The application provides various filtering options, an interactive map, a timeline, and a collection of graphs to help users analyze the data. Moreover, this application provides users with the option to download aggregated data for specific periods by applying filters and clicking the "Download Posts" button. This feature allows users to easily extract and analyze social media data outside of the web application, providing greater flexibility and control over data analysis.

The dataset is provided by INFALIA.

INFALIA, being a spin-off of the CERTH institute and a partner of a research EU project, releases this dataset containing Tweets IDs and post pre-processing data for the sole purpose of enabling the validation of the research conducted within the DeepCube. Moreover, Twitter Content provided in this dataset to third parties remains subject to the Twitter Policy, and those third parties must agree to the Twitter Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, Developer Agreement, and Developer Policy (https://developer.twitter.com/en/developer-terms) before receiving this download.

This data set belongs to:Beyens, I., Pouwels, J. L., van Driel, I. I., Keijsers, L., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2020). The effect of social media on well-being differs from adolescent to adolescent. Scientific Reports. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-67727-7The design, sampling and analysis plan of the study are available on the Open Science Framework (OSF) at https://osf.io/nhks2.For more information, please contact the authors at i.beyens@uva.nl or info@project-awesome.nl.

YouTube, Instagram and Snapchat are the most popular online platforms among teens. Fully 95% of teens have access to a smartphone, and 45% say they are online 'almost constantly

this dataset has all you need to know about apps that are more popular among teens

Description. This project contains the dataset relative to the Galatanet survey, conducted in 2009 and 2010 at the Galatasaray University in Istanbul (Turkey). The goal of this survey was to retrieve information regarding the social relationships between students, their feeling regarding the university in general, and their purchase behavior. The survey was conducted during two phases: the first one in 2009 and the second in 2010.

The dataset includes two kinds of data. First, the answers to most of the questions are contained in a large table, available under both CSV and MS Excel formats. An description file allows understanding the meaning of each field appearing in the table. Note the
survey form is also contained in the archive, for reference (it is in French and Turkish only, though). Second, the social network of students is available under both Pajek and Graphml formats. Having both individual (nodal attributes) and relational (links) information in the same dataset is, to our knowledge, rare and difficult to find in public sources, and this makes (to our opinion) this dataset interesting and valuable.

All data are completely anonymous: students' names have been replaced by random numbers. Note that the survey is not exactly the same between the two phases: some small adjustments were applied thanks to the feedback from the first phase (but the datasets have been normalized since then). Also, the electronic form was very much improved for the second phase, which explains why the answers are much more complete than in the first phase.

The data were used in our following publications:

1. Labatut, V. & Balasque, J.-M. (2010). Business-oriented Analysis of a Social Network of University Students. In: International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining, 25-32. Odense, DK : IEEE. ⟨hal-00633643⟩ - DOI: 10.1109/ASONAM.2010.15
2. An extended version of the original article: Labatut, V. & Balasque, J.-M. (2013). Informative Value of Individual and Relational Data Compared Through Business-Oriented Community Detection. Özyer, T.; Rokne, J.; Wagner, G. & Reuser, A. H. (Eds.), The Influence of Technology on Social Network Analysis and Mining, Springer, 2013, chap.6, 303-330. ⟨hal-00633650⟩ - DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-1346-2_13
3. A more didactic article using some of these data just for illustration purposes: Labatut, V. & Balasque, J.-M. (2012). Detection and Interpretation of Communities in Complex Networks: Methods and Practical Application. Abraham, A. & Hassanien, A.-E. (Eds.), Computational Social Networks: Tools, Perspectives and Applications, Springer, chap.4, 81-113. ⟨hal-00633653⟩ - DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-4048-1_4

Citation. If you use this data, please cite article [1] above:

@InProceedings{Labatut2010,
author = {Labatut, Vincent and Balasque, Jean-Michel},
title = {Business-oriented Analysis of a Social Network of University Students},
booktitle = {International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining},
year = {2010},
pages = {25-32},
address = {Odense, DK},
publisher = {IEEE Publishing},
doi = {10.1109/ASONAM.2010.15},
}

Contact. 2009-2010 by Jean-Michel Balasque (jmbalasque@gsu.edu.tr) & Vincent Labatut (vlabatut@gsu.edu.tr)

License. This dataset is open data: you can redistribute it and/or use it under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero license (see `license.txt`).