PurposeIdentify risk factors of progression in treated normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) in highly myopic and non-highly myopic eyes.MethodsThis retrospective, observational case series study included 42 highly myopic glaucoma (HMG, <-6D) eyes and 39 non-highly myopic glaucoma (NHG,≧-6D) eyes. Glaucoma progression was determined by serial visual field data. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression method were used to detect associations between potential risk factors and glaucoma progression.ResultsAmong 81 eyes from 81 normal-tension glaucoma patients (mean follow-up, 3.10 years), 20 of 42 eye (45.24%) in the HMG and 14 of 39 eyes (35.90%) in the NHG showed progression. The HMG group had larger optic disc tilt ratio (p = 0.007) and thinner inferior macular thickness (P = 0.03) than the NHG group. Changes in the linear regression values for MD for each group were as follows: -0.652 dB/year for the HMG and -0.717 dB/year for the NHG (P = 0.298). Basal pattern standard deviation (PSD) (OR: 1.55, p = 0.016) and post treatment IOP (OR = 1.54, p = 0.043) were risk factors for visual field progression in normal tension glaucoma patients. In subgroup analysis of HMG patients, PSD (OR: 2.77, p = 0.017) was a risk factor for visual field progression.ConclusionReduction IOP was postulated to be contributing in the prevention of visual field progression, especially in highly myopic NTG patients with large basal pattern standard deviation.

Abstract

The dataset was derived by the Bioregional Assessment Programme from multiple source datasets. The source datasets are identified in the Lineage field in this metadata statement. The processes undertaken to produce this derived dataset are described in the History field in this metadata statement.

Various climate variables summary for all 15 subregions based on Bureau of Meteorology Australian Water Availability Project (BAWAP) climate grids. Including

1. Time series mean annual BAWAP rainfall from 1900 - 2012.

2. Long term average BAWAP rainfall and Penman Potentail Evapotranspiration (PET) from Jan 1981 - Dec 2012 for each month

3. Values calculated over the years 1981 - 2012 (inclusive), for 17 time periods (i.e., annual, 4 seasons and 12 months) for the following 8 meteorological variables: (i) BAWAP_P (precipitation); (ii) Penman ETp; (iii) Tavg (average temperature); (iv) Tmax (maximum temperature); (v) Tmin (minimum temperature); (vi) VPD (Vapour Pressure Deficit); (vii) Rn (net radiation); and (viii) Wind speed. For each of the 17 time periods for each of the 8 meteorological variables have calculated the: (a) average; (b) maximum; (c) minimum; (d) average plus standard deviation (stddev); (e) average minus stddev; (f) stddev; and (g) trend.

4. Correlation coefficients (-1 to 1) between rainfall and 4 remote rainfall drivers between 1957-2006 for the four seasons. The data and methodology are described in Risbey et al. (2009).

As described in the Risbey et al. (2009) paper, the rainfall was from 0.05 degree gridded data described in Jeffrey et al. (2001 - known as the SILO datasets); sea surface temperature was from the Hadley Centre Sea Ice and Sea Surface Temperature dataset (HadISST) on a 1 degree grid. BLK=Blocking; DMI=Dipole Mode Index; SAM=Southern Annular Mode; SOI=Southern Oscillation Index; DJF=December, January, February; MAM=March, April, May; JJA=June, July, August; SON=September, October, November. The analysis is a summary of Fig. 15 of Risbey et al. (2009).

There are 4 csv files here:

BAWAP_P_annual_BA_SYB_GLO.csv

Desc: Time series mean annual BAWAP rainfall from 1900 - 2012.

Source data: annual BILO rainfall

P_PET_monthly_BA_SYB_GLO.csv

long term average BAWAP rainfall and Penman PET from 198101 - 201212 for each month

Climatology_Trend_BA_SYB_GLO.csv

Values calculated over the years 1981 - 2012 (inclusive), for 17 time periods (i.e., annual, 4 seasons and 12 months) for the following 8 meteorological variables: (i) BAWAP_P; (ii) Penman ETp; (iii) Tavg; (iv) Tmax; (v) Tmin; (vi) VPD; (vii) Rn; and (viii) Wind speed. For each of the 17 time periods for each of the 8 meteorological variables have calculated the: (a) average; (b) maximum; (c) minimum; (d) average plus standard deviation (stddev); (e) average minus stddev; (f) stddev; and (g) trend

Risbey_Remote_Rainfall_Drivers_Corr_Coeffs_BA_NSB_GLO.csv

Correlation coefficients (-1 to 1) between rainfall and 4 remote rainfall drivers between 1957-2006 for the four seasons. The data and methodology are described in Risbey et al. (2009). As described in the Risbey et al. (2009) paper, the rainfall was from 0.05 degree gridded data described in Jeffrey et al. (2001 - known as the SILO datasets); sea surface temperature was from the Hadley Centre Sea Ice and Sea Surface Temperature dataset (HadISST) on a 1 degree grid. BLK=Blocking; DMI=Dipole Mode Index; SAM=Southern Annular Mode; SOI=Southern Oscillation Index; DJF=December, January, February; MAM=March, April, May; JJA=June, July, August; SON=September, October, November. The analysis is a summary of Fig. 15 of Risbey et al. (2009).

Dataset History

Dataset was created from various BAWAP source data, including Monthly BAWAP rainfall, Tmax, Tmin, VPD, etc, and other source data including monthly Penman PET, Correlation coefficient data. Data were extracted from national datasets for the GLO subregion.

BAWAP_P_annual_BA_SYB_GLO.csv

Desc: Time series mean annual BAWAP rainfall from 1900 - 2012.

Source data: annual BILO rainfall

P_PET_monthly_BA_SYB_GLO.csv

long term average BAWAP rainfall and Penman PET from 198101 - 201212 for each month

Climatology_Trend_BA_SYB_GLO.csv

Values calculated over the years 1981 - 2012 (inclusive), for 17 time periods (i.e., annual, 4 seasons and 12 months) for the following 8 meteorological variables: (i) BAWAP_P; (ii) Penman ETp; (iii) Tavg; (iv) Tmax; (v) Tmin; (vi) VPD; (vii) Rn; and (viii) Wind speed. For each of the 17 time periods for each of the 8 meteorological variables have calculated the: (a) average; (b) maximum; (c) minimum; (d) average plus standard deviation (stddev); (e) average minus stddev; (f) stddev; and (g) trend

Risbey_Remote_Rainfall_Drivers_Corr_Coeffs_BA_NSB_GLO.csv

Correlation coefficients (-1 to 1) between rainfall and 4 remote rainfall drivers between 1957-2006 for the four seasons. The data and methodology are described in Risbey et al. (2009). As described in the Risbey et al. (2009) paper, the rainfall was from 0.05 degree gridded data described in Jeffrey et al. (2001 - known as the SILO datasets); sea surface temperature was from the Hadley Centre Sea Ice and Sea Surface Temperature dataset (HadISST) on a 1 degree grid. BLK=Blocking; DMI=Dipole Mode Index; SAM=Southern Annular Mode; SOI=Southern Oscillation Index; DJF=December, January, February; MAM=March, April, May; JJA=June, July, August; SON=September, October, November. The analysis is a summary of Fig. 15 of Risbey et al. (2009).

Dataset Citation

Bioregional Assessment Programme (2014) GLO climate data stats summary. Bioregional Assessment Derived Dataset. Viewed 18 July 2018, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/afed85e0-7819-493d-a847-ec00a318e657.

Dataset Ancestors

• Derived From Natural Resource Management (NRM) Regions 2010

• Derived From Bioregional Assessment areas v03

• Derived From BILO Gridded Climate Data: Daily Climate Data for each year from 1900 to 2012

• Derived From Bioregional Assessment areas v01

• Derived From Bioregional Assessment areas v02

• Derived From GEODATA TOPO 250K Series 3

• Derived From NSW Catchment Management Authority Boundaries 20130917

• Derived From Geological Provinces - Full Extent

• Derived From GEODATA TOPO 250K Series 3, File Geodatabase format (.gdb)

TMPA (3B42RT_Daily) dataset have been discontinued as of Dec. 31, 2019, and users are strongly encouraged to shift to the successor IMERG dataset (doi: 10.5067/GPM/IMERGDE/DAY/06; 10.5067/GPM/IMERGDL/DAY/06).This daily accumulated precipitation product is generated from the Near Real-Time 3-hourly TRMM Multi-Satellite Precipitation Analysis TMPA (3B42RT). It is produced at the NASA GES DISC, as a value added product. Simple summation of valid retrievals in a grid cell is applied for the data day. The result is given in (mm). Although the grid is from 60S to 60N, the high latitudes (beyond 50S/N) near real-time retrievals are considered very unreliable and thus are screened out from the daily accumulations. The beginning and ending time for every daily granule are listed in the file global attributes, and are taken correspondingly from the first and the last 3-hourly granules participating in the aggregation. Thus the time period covered by one daily granule amounts to 24 hours, which can be inspected in the file global attributes. Counts of valid retrievals for the day are provided for every variable, making it possible to compute conditional and unconditional mean precipitation for grid cells where less than 8 retrievals for the day are available.Efforts have been made to make the format of this derived product as similar as possible to the new Global Precipitation Measurement CF-compliant file format. The latency of this derived daily product is about 7 hours after the UTC day is closed. Users should be mindful that the price for the short latency of these data is the reduced quality as compared to the research quality product.The information provided here on the TRMM mission, and on the original 3-hr 3B42 product, remain relevant for this derived product. Note, however, this product is in netCDF-4 format.The following describes the derivation in more details.The daily accumulation is derived by summing valid retrievals in a grid cell for the data day. Since the 3-hourly source data are in mm/hr, a factor of 3 is applied to the sum. Thus, for every grid cell we have Pdaily = 3 * SUM{Pi * 1[Pi valid]}, i=[1,Nf]Pdaily_cnt = SUM{1[Pi valid]}where:Pdaily - Daily accumulation (mm)Pi - 3-hourly input, in (mm/hr)Nf - Number of 3-hourly files per day, Nf=81[.] - Indicator function; 1 when Pi is valid, 0 otherwisePdaily_cnt - Number of valid retrievals in a grid cell per day.Grid cells for which Pdaily_cnt=0, are set to fill value in the Daily files.Note that Pi=0 is a valid value.On occasion, the 3-hourly source data have fill values for Pi in a very few grid cells. The total accumulation for such grid cells is still issued, inspite of the likelihood that thus resulting accumulation has a larger uncertainty in representing the "true" daily total. These events are easily detectable using "counts" variables that contain Pdaily_cnt, whereby users can screen out any grid cells for which Pdaily_cnt less than Nf.There are various ways the accumulated daily error could be estimated from the source 3-hourly error. In this release, the daily error provided in the data files is calculated as follows. First, squared 3-hourly errors are summed, and then square root of the sum is taken. Similarly to the precipitation, a factor of 3 is finally applied:Perr_daily = 3 * { SUM[ (Perr_i * 1[Perr_i valid])^2 ] }^0.5 , i=[1,Nf]Ncnt_err = SUM( 1[Perr_i valid] )where:Perr_daily - Magnitude of the daily accumulated error power, (mm)Ncnt_err - The counts for the error variableThus computed Perr_daily represents the worst case scenario that assumes the error in the 3-hourly source data, which is given in mm/hr, is accumulating within the 3-hourly period of the source data and then during the day. These values, however, can easily be conveted to root mean square error estimate of the rainfall rate:rms_err = { (Perr_daily/3) ^2 / Ncnt_err }^0.5 (mm/hr)This estimate assumes that the error given in the 3-hourly files is representative of the error of the rainfall rate (mm/hr) within the 3-hour window of the files, and it is random throughout the day. Note, this should be interpreted as the error of the rainfall rate (mm/hr) for the day, not the daily accumulation.

TMPA (3B42RT) dataset have been discontinued as of Dec. 31, 2019, and users are strongly encouraged to shift to the successor IMERG datasets (doi: 10.5067/GPM/IMERG/3B-HH-E/06, 10.5067/GPM/IMERG/3B-HH-L/06).These data were output from the TRMM Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA), the Near Real-Time (RT) processing stream. The latency was about seven hours from the observation time, although processing issues may delay or prevent this schedule. Users should be mindful that the price for the short latency of these data is the reduced quality as compared to the research quality product.Each file is a snapshot considered to represent the three-hour period centered on the "nominal" file time. So, e.g., 00 UTC nominally represents the period from 2230 UTC of the previous day to 0130 UTC of the current day. Estimates outside the band 50 degree N-S are considered highly experimental. GES DISC initially receives these data from the Precipitation Processing System (PPS) in binary format. However, before archiving, the data are scaled to real numbers, and re-arranged to a standard grid so that the first grid cell is at 180W, 60S. Thus formatted, data are stored into CF-1.6 compliant netCDF-4 files and archived. This format is machine-independent, self-explanatory, provides extremely efficient seamless compression, and gives various options for previewing the data without downloading it.Apart from these technical differences, all other science content details remain the same, and users are strongly encouraged to read the provider's documentation that is linked to from here.

The Physiographic Domains (DF) represent the geological and physiographic context within which each Sheet (or portions of it) falls.The dimensions of the DF are from sub-regional to regional, i.e. such that a Sheet can also fall entirely within a single DF.The DF are represented using coloured closed areas, on a scale of 1:250,000.The following DF:Piattaforma Continental, continental Scarpata, Incarpata Basin and Batial Plain, Intrascarpata Relief and Seamount, Vulcanic System, Erosive Areas.For the definition of DF, please refer to the document "Guide_Nomenclaturale_Magic.

Abstract

The dataset was derived by the Bioregional Assessment Programme from multiple source datasets. The source datasets are identified in the Lineage field in this metadata statement. The processes undertaken to produce this derived dataset are described in the History field in this metadata statement.

This is the same as the source data "BOM, Australian Average Rainfall Data from 1961 to 1990" but clipped to the combined extent of the Hunter subregion and Sydney Basin bioregion.

Purpose

Report map production.

Dataset History

The source Aust wide rainfall raster rainann was clipped to the Hunter subregion + sydney Basin bioregion using ArcMap Spatial Analyst Extract by Mask tool

Dataset Citation

Bioregional Assessment Programme (2015) SYD Mean Annual Rainfall v01. Bioregional Assessment Derived Dataset. Viewed 22 June 2018, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/81593e61-cada-44e1-a8e9-1710cdf2fcf2.

Dataset Ancestors

• Derived From Bioregional Assessment areas v02

• Derived From Gippsland Project boundary

• Derived From Bioregional Assessment areas v04

• Derived From Natural Resource Management (NRM) Regions 2010

• Derived From Bioregional Assessment areas v03

• Derived From Victoria - Seamless Geology 2014

• Derived From Bioregional Assessment areas v05

• Derived From BOM, Australian Average Rainfall Data from 1961 to 1990

• Derived From Bioregional Assessment areas v01

• Derived From GEODATA TOPO 250K Series 3, File Geodatabase format (.gdb)

• Derived From GEODATA TOPO 250K Series 3

• Derived From NSW Catchment Management Authority Boundaries 20130917

• Derived From Geological Provinces - Full Extent

• Derived From Bioregional Assessment areas v06

Analysis of ‘NSA42 - Mean Annual Earnings’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from http://data.europa.eu/88u/dataset/5e46e15d-fbe9-4834-a367-9619a797a9c5 on 19 January 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

Mean Annual Earnings

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

The Lands pdf represent the _location and project number of NMDOT Construction projects.

Licensed under: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

The RSS SMAP Level 3 Sea Surface Salinity Standard Mapped Image 8-Day Running Mean V6.0 Validated Dataset produced by the Remote Sensing Systems (RSS) and sponsored by the NASA Ocean Salinity Science Team, is a validated product that provides orbital/swath data on sea surface salinity (SSS) derived from the NASA's Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission. The SMAP satellite was launched on 31 January 2015 with a near-polar orbit at an inclination of 98 degrees and an altitude of 685 km. It has an ascending node time of 6 pm and is sun-synchronous. With its 1000km swath, SMAP achieves global coverage in approximately 3 days, but has an exact orbit repeat cycle of 8 days. Malfunction of the SMAP scatterometer on 7 July, 2015, has necessitated the use of collocated wind speed, primarily from WindSat, for the surface roughness correction required for the surface salinity retrieval.

The major changes in Version 6.0 from Version 5.0 are: (1) Removal of biases during the first few months of the SMAP mission that are related to the operation of the SMAP radar during that time. (2) Mitigation of biases that depend on the SMAP look angle. (3) Mitigation of salty biases at high Northern latitudes. (4) Revised sun-glint flag. The RSS SMAP 8-Day running mean product is based on SSS averages spanning an 8-day moving time window, it includes data for a range of parameters: derived sea surface salinity (SSS) with SSS-uncertainty, rain filtered SMAP sea surface salinity, collocated wind speed, data and ancillary reference surface salinity data from HYCOM. Each data file is available in netCDF-4 file format with about 7-day latency (after the end of the averaging period). Data begins on April 1,2015 and is ongoing. Observations are global in extent with an approximate spatial resolution of 40KM. Note that while a SSS 40KM variable is also included in the product for most open ocean applications, The standard product of the SMAP Version 6.0 release is the smoothed salinity product with a spatial resolution of approximately 70 km.

This repository contains the Wallhack1.8k dataset for WiFi-based long-range activity recognition in Line-of-Sight (LoS) and Non-Line-of-Sight (NLoS)/Through-Wall scenarios, as proposed in [1,2], as well as the CAD models (of 3D-printable parts) of the WiFi systems proposed in [2].

PyTroch Dataloader

A minimal PyTorch dataloader for the Wallhack1.8k dataset is provided at: https://github.com/StrohmayerJ/wallhack1.8k

Dataset Description

The Wallhack1.8k dataset comprises 1,806 CSI amplitude spectrograms (and raw WiFi packet time series) corresponding to three activity classes: "no presence," "walking," and "walking + arm-waving." WiFi packets were transmitted at a frequency of 100 Hz, and each spectrogram captures a temporal context of approximately 4 seconds (400 WiFi packets).

To assess cross-scenario and cross-system generalization, WiFi packet sequences were collected in LoS and through-wall (NLoS) scenarios, utilizing two different WiFi systems (BQ: biquad antenna and PIFA: printed inverted-F antenna). The dataset is structured accordingly:

LOS/BQ/ <- WiFi packets collected in the LoS scenario using the BQ system

LOS/PIFA/ <- WiFi packets collected in the LoS scenario using the PIFA system

NLOS/BQ/ <- WiFi packets collected in the NLoS scenario using the BQ system

NLOS/PIFA/ <- WiFi packets collected in the NLoS scenario using the PIFA system

These directories contain the raw WiFi packet time series (see Table 1). Each row represents a single WiFi packet with the complex CSI vector H being stored in the "data" field and the class label being stored in the "class" field. H is of the form [I, R, I, R, ..., I, R], where two consecutive entries represent imaginary and real parts of complex numbers (the Channel Frequency Responses of subcarriers). Taking the absolute value of H (e.g., via numpy.abs(H)) yields the subcarrier amplitudes A.

To extract the 52 L-LTF subcarriers used in [1], the following indices of A are to be selected:

52 L-LTF subcarriers

csi_valid_subcarrier_index = [] csi_valid_subcarrier_index += [i for i in range(6, 32)] csi_valid_subcarrier_index += [i for i in range(33, 59)]

Additional 56 HT-LTF subcarriers can be selected via:

56 HT-LTF subcarriers

csi_valid_subcarrier_index += [i for i in range(66, 94)]
csi_valid_subcarrier_index += [i for i in range(95, 123)]

For more details on subcarrier selection, see ESP-IDF (Section Wi-Fi Channel State Information) and esp-csi.

Extracted amplitude spectrograms with the corresponding label files of the train/validation/test split: "trainLabels.csv," "validationLabels.csv," and "testLabels.csv," can be found in the spectrograms/ directory.

The columns in the label files correspond to the following: [Spectrogram index, Class label, Room label]

Spectrogram index: [0, ..., n]

Class label: [0,1,2], where 0 = "no presence", 1 = "walking", and 2 = "walking + arm-waving."

Room label: [0,1,2,3,4,5], where labels 1-5 correspond to the room number in the NLoS scenario (see Fig. 3 in [1]). The label 0 corresponds to no room and is used for the "no presence" class.

Dataset Overview:

Table 1: Raw WiFi packet sequences.

Scenario System "no presence" / label 0 "walking" / label 1 "walking + arm-waving" / label 2 Total

LoS BQ b1.csv w1.csv, w2.csv, w3.csv, w4.csv and w5.csv ww1.csv, ww2.csv, ww3.csv, ww4.csv and ww5.csv

LoS PIFA b1.csv w1.csv, w2.csv, w3.csv, w4.csv and w5.csv ww1.csv, ww2.csv, ww3.csv, ww4.csv and ww5.csv

NLoS BQ b1.csv w1.csv, w2.csv, w3.csv, w4.csv and w5.csv ww1.csv, ww2.csv, ww3.csv, ww4.csv and ww5.csv

NLoS PIFA b1.csv w1.csv, w2.csv, w3.csv, w4.csv and w5.csv ww1.csv, ww2.csv, ww3.csv, ww4.csv and ww5.csv

4 20 20 44

Table 2: Sample/Spectrogram distribution across activity classes in Wallhack1.8k.

Scenario System

"no presence" / label 0

"walking" / label 1

"walking + arm-waving" / label 2 Total

LoS BQ 149 154 155

LoS PIFA 149 160 152

NLoS BQ 148 150 152

NLoS PIFA 143 147 147

589 611 606 1,806

Download and UseThis data may be used for non-commercial research purposes only. If you publish material based on this data, we request that you include a reference to one of our papers [1,2].

[1] Strohmayer, Julian, and Martin Kampel. (2024). “Data Augmentation Techniques for Cross-Domain WiFi CSI-Based Human Activity Recognition”, In IFIP International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations (pp. 42-56). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63211-2_4.

[2] Strohmayer, Julian, and Martin Kampel., “Directional Antenna Systems for Long-Range Through-Wall Human Activity Recognition,” 2024 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2024, pp. 3594-3599, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP51287.2024.10647666.

BibTeX citations:

@inproceedings{strohmayer2024data, title={Data Augmentation Techniques for Cross-Domain WiFi CSI-Based Human Activity Recognition}, author={Strohmayer, Julian and Kampel, Martin}, booktitle={IFIP International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations}, pages={42--56}, year={2024}, organization={Springer}}@INPROCEEDINGS{10647666, author={Strohmayer, Julian and Kampel, Martin}, booktitle={2024 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)}, title={Directional Antenna Systems for Long-Range Through-Wall Human Activity Recognition}, year={2024}, volume={}, number={}, pages={3594-3599}, keywords={Visualization;Accuracy;System performance;Directional antennas;Directive antennas;Reflector antennas;Sensors;Human Activity Recognition;WiFi;Channel State Information;Through-Wall Sensing;ESP32}, doi={10.1109/ICIP51287.2024.10647666}}

Analysis of ‘Cadastral PLSS Standardized Data - PLSSSecond Division (Dalhart) - Version 1.1’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/5250322a-ed44-46c8-b28b-3f70d797b42c on 28 January 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

This feature class is part of the Cadastral National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) CADNSDI publication data set for rectangular and non-rectangular Public Land Survey System (PLSS) data set. The metadata description in the Cadastral Reference System Feature Data Set more fully describes the entire data set. This feature class is the second division of the PLSS is quarter, quarter-quarter, sixteenth or government lot divisions of the PLSS. The second and third divisions are combined into this feature class as an intentional de-normalization of the PLSS hierarchical data. The polygons in this feature class represent the smallest division to the sixteenth that has been defined for the first division. For example In some cases sections have only been divided to the quarter. Divisions below the sixteenth are in the Special Survey or Parcel Feature Class.

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

Abstract

The dataset was derived by the Bioregional Assessment Programme from multiple source datasets. The source datasets are identified in the Lineage field in this metadata statement. The processes undertaken to produce this derived dataset are described in the History field in this metadata statement.

These 'ghost' model node points are duplicates of the primary surface water model nodes. The 'ghost' nodes are located on the blue line stream network used to represent the riverine landscape classes and the primary model nodes are located on the BA-standard Geofabric Network blue line network. The ghost nodes are placed according to the following rule set (1) the primary sw model node is on the Geofabric Network blue line (2) keep the ghost node within the same catchment as the primary node (3) keep the ghost node within the same assessment unit as the primary node.

The purpose of the ghost nodes are to enable replication of the surface water modelling results across differently mapped blue line networks of the same physical rivers. In this case, from the BA-standard blue line stream network (Geofabric Network streams v2) to the riverine landscape class blue line.

Purpose

The purpose of the ghost nodes are to enable replication of the surface water modelling results across differently mapped blue line networks of the same physical rivers. In this case, from the BA-standard blue line stream network (Geofabric Network streams v2) to the riverine landscape class blue line. THis enable direct use of the surface water modelling in the impact analysis component of hte BA.

Dataset History

These 'ghost' model node points are duplicates of the primary surface water model nodes. The 'ghost' nodes are located on the blue line stream network used to represent the riverine landscape classes and the primary model nodes are located on the BA-standard Geofabric Network blue line network. The ghost nodes are placed according to the following rule set (1) the primary sw model node is on the Geofabric Network blue line (2) keep the ghost node within the same catchment as the primary node (3) keep the ghost node within the same assessment unit as the primary node.

The purpose of the ghost nodes are to enable replication of the surface water modelling results across differently mapped blue line networks of the same physical rivers. In this case, from the BA-standard blue line stream network (Geofabric Network streams v2) to the riverine landscape class blue line.

Dataset Citation

Bioregional Assessment Programme (XXXX) GLO Surface water model RiverStyle ghost nodes 20160829 v01. Bioregional Assessment Derived Dataset. Viewed 18 July 2018, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/685dd2e9-08aa-4ac3-9958-385e18ce37e4.

Dataset Ancestors

• Derived From Standard Instrument Local Environmental Plan (LEP) - Heritage (HER) (NSW)

• Derived From NSW Office of Water GW licence extract linked to spatial locations - GLO v5 UID elements 27032014

• Derived From GLO Assessment units 500m 20160705

• Derived From Gloucester digitised coal mine boundaries

• Derived From Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems supplied by the NSW Office of Water on 13/05/2014

• Derived From Geofabric Hydrology Reporting Catchments - V2.1

• Derived From Greater Hunter Native Vegetation Mapping with Classification for Mapping

• Derived From Australian Coal Basins

• Derived From Natural Resource Management (NRM) Regions 2010

• Derived From NSW Office of Water GW licence extract linked to spatial locations GLOv4 UID 14032014

• Derived From Communities of National Environmental Significance Database - RESTRICTED - Metadata only

• Derived From National Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems (GDE) Atlas

• Derived From Asset database for the Gloucester subregion on 12 September 2014

• Derived From GEODATA 9 second DEM and D8: Digital Elevation Model Version 3 and Flow Direction Grid 2008

• Derived From National Groundwater Information System (NGIS) v1.1

• Derived From GLO Receptors 20150518

• Derived From Groundwater Entitlement Data GLO NSW Office of Water 20150320 PersRemoved

• Derived From GLO Landscape Classification v01

• Derived From Asset database for the Gloucester subregion on 28 May 2015

• Derived From Geofabric Surface Cartography - V2.1

• Derived From Groundwater Entitlement Data Gloucester - NSW Office of Water 20150320

• Derived From Collaborative Australian Protected Areas Database (CAPAD) 2010 - External Restricted

• Derived From Mean Annual Climate Data of Australia 1981 to 2012

• Derived From National Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems (GDE) Atlas (including WA)

• Derived From EIS Gloucester Coal 2010

• Derived From Report for Director Generals Requirement Rocky Hill Project 2012

• Derived From Species Profile and Threats Database (SPRAT) - Australia - Species of National Environmental Significance Database (BA subset - RESTRICTED - Metadata only)

• Derived From GEODATA TOPO 250K Series 3, File Geodatabase format (.gdb)

• Derived From Bioregional_Assessment_Programme_Catchment Scale Land Use of Australia - 2014

• Derived From GEODATA TOPO 250K Series 3

• Derived From Australian Geological Provinces, v02

• Derived From NSW Catchment Management Authority Boundaries 20130917

• Derived From Geological Provinces - Full Extent

• Derived From BILO Gridded Climate Data: Daily Climate Data for each year from 1900 to 2012

• Derived From NSW Office of Water GW licence extract linked to spatial locations GLOv3 12032014

• Derived From EIS for Rocky Hill Coal Project 2013

• Derived From Gloucester River Types v01

• Derived From GLO Preliminary Assessment Extent

• Derived From National Heritage List Spatial Database (NHL) (v2.1)

• Derived From Gloucester river types V02

• Derived From Asset database for the Gloucester subregion on 8 April 2015

• Derived From Gloucester - Additional assets from local councils

• Derived From NSW Office of Water combined geodatabase of regulated rivers and water sharing plan regions

• Derived From Asset database for the Gloucester subregion on 29 August 2014

• Derived From Gloucester Coal Basin

• Derived From GLO Landscape Classes split by 500m Assessment Units v01

• Derived From New South Wales NSW Regional CMA Water Asset Information WAIT tool databases, RESTRICTED Includes ALL Reports

*

This dataset contains the Global Mean Sea Level (GMSL) trend generated from the Integrated Multi-Mission Ocean Altimeter Data for Climate Research ( http://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/dataset/MERGED_TP_J1_OSTM_OST_ALL_V42 ). The GMSL is a 1-dimensional time series of globally averaged Sea Surface Height Anomalies (SSHA) from TOPEX/Poseidon, Jason-1, OSTM/Jason-2 and Jason-3. It starts in September 1992 to present, with a lag of up to 4 months. The data are reported as variations relative to a 20-year TOPEX/Jason collinear mean. Bias adjustments and cross-calibrations were applied to ensure SSHA data are consistent across the missions; Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) was also applied. However this product does not use the TOPEX internal calibration-mode range correction. This is the main difference between version 4 and version 4.2. More information on this calibration can be found at Beckley et al. 2017 DOI 10.1002/2017JC013090. These data are available in ASCII format.

We present a continuous land climate reconstruction dataset extending from 60 kyr before present to the pre-industrial period at 0.5deg resolution on a monthly timestep for 0degN to 90degN. It has been generated from 42 discrete snapshot simulations using the HadCM3B-M2.1 coupled general circulation model. We incorporate Dansgaard-Oeschger (DO) and Heinrich events to represent millennial scale variability, based on a temperature reconstruction from Greenland ice-cores, with a spatial fingerprint based on a freshwater hosing simulation with HadCM3B-M2.1. Interannual variability is also added and derived from the initial snapshot simulations. Model output has been downscaled to 0.5deg resolution (using simple bilinear interpolation) and bias corrected using either the University of East Anglia, Climate Research Unit observational data (for temperature, precipitation, windchill, and minimum monthly temperature), or the EWEMBI dataset (for incoming shortwave energy). Here we provide datasets for; surface air temperature, precipitation, incoming shortwave energy, wind-chill, snow depth (as snow water equivalent), number of rainy days per month, minimum monthly temperature, and the land-sea mask and ice fractions used in the simulations. The datasets are in the form of NetCDF files. The variables are represented by a set of 24 files that have been compressed into nine folders: temp, precip, down_sw, wind_chill, snow, rainy_days, tempmonmin, landmask and icefrac. Each file represents 2500 years. The landmask and ice fraction are provided annually, whereas the climate variables are given as monthly files equivalent to 30000 months, between the latitudes 0deg to 90degN at 0.5deg resolution. Each of the climate files therefore have the dimensions 180 (lat) x 720 (lon) x 30000 (month). We also provide an example subset of the temperature dataset, which gives decadal averages for each month for 0-2500 years.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the mean household income for each of the five quintiles in Jasper, AL, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in mean household income across quintiles, offering valuable insights into income distribution and inequality.

Key observations

• Income disparities: The mean income of the lowest quintile (20% of households with the lowest income) is 14,691, while the mean income for the highest quintile (20% of households with the highest income) is 191,140. This indicates that the top earners earn 13 times compared to the lowest earners.
• *Top 5%: * The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 292,266, which is 152.91% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 1989.42% higher compared to the lowest quintile.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income Levels:

• Lowest Quintile
• Second Quintile
• Third Quintile
• Fourth Quintile
• Highest Quintile
• Top 5 Percent

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Level: This column showcases the income levels (As mentioned above).
• Mean Household Income: Mean household income, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific income level.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Jasper median household income. You can refer the same here

Generally speaking, the stakes are people, property, activities, cultural or environmental heritage elements, threatened by a hazard and likely to be affected or damaged by it. The sensitivity of an issue to a hazard is called “vulnerability”. This object class brings together all the issues that have been addressed in the RPP study. An issue is a dated object whose consideration depends on the purpose of the RPP and its vulnerability to the hazards studied. A PPR issue can therefore be considered (or not) depending on the type or types of hazard being addressed. These elements form the basis of knowledge of the land cover necessary for the development of the RPP, in or near the study area, at the time of the analysis of the issues. The data on issues represent a (figible and non-exhaustive) photograph of assets and individuals exposed to hazards at the time of the development of the risk prevention plan. This data is not updated after approval of the RPP. In practice they are no longer used: the issues are recalculated as necessary with up-to-date data sources.

Generally speaking, the stakes are people, property, activities, cultural or environmental heritage elements, threatened by a hazard and likely to be affected or damaged by it. The sensitivity of an issue to a hazard is called “vulnerability”. This object class brings together all the issues that have been addressed in the RPP study. An issue is a dated object whose consideration depends on the purpose of the RPP and its vulnerability to the hazards studied. A PPR issue can therefore be considered (or not) depending on the type or types of hazard being addressed. These elements form the basis of knowledge of the land cover necessary for the development of the RPP, in or near the study area, at the time of the analysis of the issues. The data on issues represent a (figible and non-exhaustive) photograph of assets and individuals exposed to hazards at the time of the development of the risk prevention plan. This data is not updated after approval of the RPP. In practice they are no longer used: the issues are recalculated as necessary with up-to-date data sources. Generally speaking, the stakes are people, property, activities, cultural or environmental heritage elements, threatened by a hazard and likely to be affected or damaged by it. The sensitivity of an issue to a hazard is called “vulnerability”. This object class brings together all the issues that have been addressed in the RPP study. An issue is a dated object whose consideration depends on the purpose of the RPP and its vulnerability to the hazards studied. A PPR issue can therefore be considered (or not) depending on the type or types of hazard being addressed. These elements form the basis of knowledge of the land cover necessary for the development of the RPP, in or near the study area, at the time of the analysis of the issues. The data on issues represent a (figible and non-exhaustive) photograph of assets and individuals exposed to hazards at the time of the development of the risk prevention plan. This data is not updated after approval of the RPP. In practice they are no longer used: the issues are recalculated as necessary with up-to-date data sources.

Abstract

This dataset was supplied to the Bioregional Assessment Programme by a third party and is presented here as originally supplied. Metadata was not provided and has been compiled by the Bioregional Assessment Programme based on known details at the time of acquisition.

Mean monthly flow (ML/month) and Annual flow (ML/yr) data at key gauges in the Macalister Irrigation District (MID) as monitored by SRW. The data are provided in MS Excel format in worksheets and charts.

Data used to produce Time-series drainage volume data provided by a third party. Site information and monitoring drainage flow data provided by the Southern Rural Water are specific to the Macalister Irrigation District.

Time specific data in the range 23/07/1997 to 31/12/2013

Dataset History

This dialogue has been copied from a draft of the BA-GIP report.

A total of 197 river gauges were identified within the model area representing all of the major rivers. Daily gauge level data was sourced from the Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Water Measurement Information System (WMIS, 2015). A list of the river gauges is provided in the report for key river basins

Only main stems of the major rivers were included in the model. These river reaches were identified using the DEPI hydro25 spatial data set (DEPI, 2014). The river classification was used to vary river incision depth (depth below the ground surface as defined by the digital elevation model) and width attributes. In the absence of recorded stage height information, river classification was used to estimate river stage heights. A total of 22,573 river cells are included in the model. Fifty-one gauges were selected to calibrate the catchment modelling framework in unregulated catchments based on Base Flow Indexes and observed stream flows.

Drainage channels and man-made drainage features in the Macalister Irrigation District (MID) were included in the model based on available drainage network mapping. This information was sourced from Southern Rural Water (SRW) and the DEPI Corporate Spatial Data library. Drainage cells are assigned to the uppermost cells within the model to capture groundwater discharge processes. Drain cells in Modflow can only act as groundwater discharge points and as such those cells outside drainage channels will be characterised as having a bed elevation equivalent to ground surface elevation. A total of 410,504 drainage cells are incorporated in the model. Apart from 3 river gauges sourced from the WMIS, SRW also has 15 gauges monitored drainage from the MID. The measurements commenced between 1997 and 2005. Of the 15 gauges, six were selected to calibrate the catchment modelling framework based on observed discharge.

Dataset Citation

Victorian Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources (2015) Mean monthly flow & annual flow data - Macalister Irrigation District. Bioregional Assessment Source Dataset. Viewed 05 October 2018, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/6ba89d78-1e42-4e02-bd5c-a435ee15bef4.

Initial Claims for UI released by the CT Department of Labor. Initial Claims are applications for Unemployment Benefits. Initial Claims may not result in receiving UI benefits if the individual doesn't qualify. Claims data can be access directly from CT DOL here: https://www1.ctdol.state.ct.us/lmi/claimsdata.asp

The initial claims reported in these tables are "processed" claims to the extent that duplicates and "reopened" claims have been eliminated. The claim counts in this dataset may not match claim counts from other sources.

Claims are disaggregated by age, education, industry, race/national origin, sex, and wages.

The claim counts in this dataset may not match claim counts from other sources.

Unemployment claims tabulated in this dataset represent only one component of the unemployed. Claims do not account for those not covered under the Unemployment system (e.g. federal workers, railroad workers or religious workers) or the unemployed self-employed.

Claims filed for a particular week will change as time goes on and the backlog is addressed.

Continued Claims for UI released by the CT Department of Labor. Continued Claims are total number of individuals being paid benefits in any particular week.

Claims are disaggregated by age, education, industry, race/national origin, sex, and wages.

The claim counts in this dataset may not match claim counts from other sources.

Unemployment claims tabulated in this dataset represent only one component of the unemployed. Claims do not account for those not covered under the Unemployment system (e.g. federal workers, railroad workers or religious workers) or the unemployed self-employed.

Claims filed for a particular week will change as time goes on and the backlog is addressed.

For data on initial claims at the town level, see the dataset "Initial Claims for Unemployment Benefits by Town," here: https://data.ct.gov/Government/Initial-Claims-for-Unemployment-Benefits-by-Town/twvc-s7wy

For data on continued claims see the following two datasets:

"Continued Claims for Unemployment Benefits in Connecticut," https://data.ct.gov/Government/Continued-Claims-for-Unemployment-Benefits-in-Conn/f9e5-rn42

"Continued Claims for Unemployment Benefits by Town," https://data.ct.gov/Government/Continued-Claims-for-Unemployment-Benefits-by-Town/r83t-9bjm