This is Part 1/2 of the ActiveHuman dataset! Part 2 can be found here. Dataset Description ActiveHuman was generated using Unity's Perception package. It consists of 175428 RGB images and their semantic segmentation counterparts taken at different environments, lighting conditions, camera distances and angles. In total, the dataset contains images for 8 environments, 33 humans, 4 lighting conditions, 7 camera distances (1m-4m) and 36 camera angles (0-360 at 10-degree intervals). The dataset does not include images at every single combination of available camera distances and angles, since for some values the camera would collide with another object or go outside the confines of an environment. As a result, some combinations of camera distances and angles do not exist in the dataset. Alongside each image, 2D Bounding Box, 3D Bounding Box and Keypoint ground truth annotations are also generated via the use of Labelers and are stored as a JSON-based dataset. These Labelers are scripts that are responsible for capturing ground truth annotations for each captured image or frame. Keypoint annotations follow the COCO format defined by the COCO keypoint annotation template offered in the perception package.

Folder configuration The dataset consists of 3 folders:

JSON Data: Contains all the generated JSON files. RGB Images: Contains the generated RGB images. Semantic Segmentation Images: Contains the generated semantic segmentation images.

Essential Terminology

Annotation: Recorded data describing a single capture. Capture: One completed rendering process of a Unity sensor which stored the rendered result to data files (e.g. PNG, JPG, etc.). Ego: Object or person on which a collection of sensors is attached to (e.g., if a drone has a camera attached to it, the drone would be the ego and the camera would be the sensor). Ego coordinate system: Coordinates with respect to the ego. Global coordinate system: Coordinates with respect to the global origin in Unity. Sensor: Device that captures the dataset (in this instance the sensor is a camera). Sensor coordinate system: Coordinates with respect to the sensor. Sequence: Time-ordered series of captures. This is very useful for video capture where the time-order relationship of two captures is vital. UIID: Universal Unique Identifier. It is a unique hexadecimal identifier that can represent an individual instance of a capture, ego, sensor, annotation, labeled object or keypoint, or keypoint template.

Dataset Data The dataset includes 4 types of JSON annotation files files:

annotation_definitions.json: Contains annotation definitions for all of the active Labelers of the simulation stored in an array. Each entry consists of a collection of key-value pairs which describe a particular type of annotation and contain information about that specific annotation describing how its data should be mapped back to labels or objects in the scene. Each entry contains the following key-value pairs:

id: Integer identifier of the annotation's definition. name: Annotation name (e.g., keypoints, bounding box, bounding box 3D, semantic segmentation). description: Description of the annotation's specifications. format: Format of the file containing the annotation specifications (e.g., json, PNG). spec: Format-specific specifications for the annotation values generated by each Labeler.

Most Labelers generate different annotation specifications in the spec key-value pair:

BoundingBox2DLabeler/BoundingBox3DLabeler:

label_id: Integer identifier of a label. label_name: String identifier of a label. KeypointLabeler:

template_id: Keypoint template UUID. template_name: Name of the keypoint template. key_points: Array containing all the joints defined by the keypoint template. This array includes the key-value pairs:

label: Joint label. index: Joint index. color: RGBA values of the keypoint. color_code: Hex color code of the keypoint skeleton: Array containing all the skeleton connections defined by the keypoint template. Each skeleton connection defines a connection between two different joints. This array includes the key-value pairs:

label1: Label of the first joint. label2: Label of the second joint. joint1: Index of the first joint. joint2: Index of the second joint. color: RGBA values of the connection. color_code: Hex color code of the connection. SemanticSegmentationLabeler:

label_name: String identifier of a label. pixel_value: RGBA values of the label. color_code: Hex color code of the label.

captures_xyz.json: Each of these files contains an array of ground truth annotations generated by each active Labeler for each capture separately, as well as extra metadata that describe the state of each active sensor that is present in the scene. Each array entry in the contains the following key-value pairs:

id: UUID of the capture. sequence_id: UUID of the sequence. step: Index of the capture within a sequence. timestamp: Timestamp (in ms) since the beginning of a sequence. sensor: Properties of the sensor. This entry contains a collection with the following key-value pairs:

sensor_id: Sensor UUID. ego_id: Ego UUID. modality: Modality of the sensor (e.g., camera, radar). translation: 3D vector that describes the sensor's position (in meters) with respect to the global coordinate system. rotation: Quaternion variable that describes the sensor's orientation with respect to the ego coordinate system. camera_intrinsic: matrix containing (if it exists) the camera's intrinsic calibration. projection: Projection type used by the camera (e.g., orthographic, perspective). ego: Attributes of the ego. This entry contains a collection with the following key-value pairs:

ego_id: Ego UUID. translation: 3D vector that describes the ego's position (in meters) with respect to the global coordinate system. rotation: Quaternion variable containing the ego's orientation. velocity: 3D vector containing the ego's velocity (in meters per second). acceleration: 3D vector containing the ego's acceleration (in ). format: Format of the file captured by the sensor (e.g., PNG, JPG). annotations: Key-value pair collections, one for each active Labeler. These key-value pairs are as follows:

id: Annotation UUID . annotation_definition: Integer identifier of the annotation's definition. filename: Name of the file generated by the Labeler. This entry is only present for Labelers that generate an image. values: List of key-value pairs containing annotation data for the current Labeler.

Each Labeler generates different annotation specifications in the values key-value pair:

BoundingBox2DLabeler:

label_id: Integer identifier of a label. label_name: String identifier of a label. instance_id: UUID of one instance of an object. Each object with the same label that is visible on the same capture has different instance_id values. x: Position of the 2D bounding box on the X axis. y: Position of the 2D bounding box position on the Y axis. width: Width of the 2D bounding box. height: Height of the 2D bounding box. BoundingBox3DLabeler:

label_id: Integer identifier of a label. label_name: String identifier of a label. instance_id: UUID of one instance of an object. Each object with the same label that is visible on the same capture has different instance_id values. translation: 3D vector containing the location of the center of the 3D bounding box with respect to the sensor coordinate system (in meters). size: 3D vector containing the size of the 3D bounding box (in meters) rotation: Quaternion variable containing the orientation of the 3D bounding box. velocity: 3D vector containing the velocity of the 3D bounding box (in meters per second). acceleration: 3D vector containing the acceleration of the 3D bounding box acceleration (in ). KeypointLabeler:

label_id: Integer identifier of a label. instance_id: UUID of one instance of a joint. Keypoints with the same joint label that are visible on the same capture have different instance_id values. template_id: UUID of the keypoint template. pose: Pose label for that particular capture. keypoints: Array containing the properties of each keypoint. Each keypoint that exists in the keypoint template file is one element of the array. Each entry's contents have as follows:

index: Index of the keypoint in the keypoint template file. x: Pixel coordinates of the keypoint on the X axis. y: Pixel coordinates of the keypoint on the Y axis. state: State of the keypoint.

The SemanticSegmentationLabeler does not contain a values list.

egos.json: Contains collections of key-value pairs for each ego. These include:

id: UUID of the ego. description: Description of the ego. sensors.json: Contains collections of key-value pairs for all sensors of the simulation. These include:

id: UUID of the sensor. ego_id: UUID of the ego on which the sensor is attached. modality: Modality of the sensor (e.g., camera, radar, sonar). description: Description of the sensor (e.g., camera, radar).

Image names The RGB and semantic segmentation images share the same image naming convention. However, the semantic segmentation images also contain the string Semantic_ at the beginning of their filenames. Each RGB image is named "e_h_l_d_r.jpg", where:

e denotes the id of the environment. h denotes the id of the person. l denotes the id of the lighting condition. d denotes the camera distance at which the image was captured. r denotes the camera angle at which the image was captured.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the mean household income for each of the five quintiles in Driggs, ID, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in mean household income across quintiles, offering valuable insights into income distribution and inequality.

Key observations

• Income disparities: The mean income of the lowest quintile (20% of households with the lowest income) is 22,552, while the mean income for the highest quintile (20% of households with the highest income) is 209,351. This indicates that the top earners earn 9 times compared to the lowest earners.
• *Top 5%: * The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 331,316, which is 158.26% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 1469.12% higher compared to the lowest quintile.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income Levels:

• Lowest Quintile
• Second Quintile
• Third Quintile
• Fourth Quintile
• Highest Quintile
• Top 5 Percent

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Level: This column showcases the income levels (As mentioned above).
• Mean Household Income: Mean household income, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific income level.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Driggs median household income. You can refer the same here

The Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) contains key device identification information submitted to the FDA about medical devices that have Unique Device Identifiers (UDI). The National Library of Medicine (NLM), in collaboration with the FDA, has created the AccessGUDID portal (the source of this dataset) to make device identification information in the GUDID available for everyone, including patients, caregivers, health care providers, hospitals, and industry. A unique device identifier (UDI) on a device label is composed of two parts: The Device Identifier (DI) - A unique numeric or alphanumeric code specific to a device version or model and Production Identifier(s) (PI) - Numeric or alphanumeric codes that identify production information for a device. The GUDID contains ONLY the Device Identifier (DI), which serves as the primary key to obtain information in the database. Production Identifiers (PI) are not submitted to or stored in the GUDID, but GUDID data indicates which PIs are on the device label. Please note: The GUDID does not collect or contain any information about patients or anyone who uses a device. Many data elements in the GUDID correspond to information on the medical device label and their definitions can be found in the GUDID Data Elements Reference Table (April 27, 2020) If you would like to learn more, see about a unique device identifier . This public dataset is hosted in Google BigQuery and is included in BigQuery's 1TB/mo of free tier processing. This means that each user receives 1TB of free BigQuery processing every month, which can be used to run queries on this public dataset. Watch this short video to learn how to get started quickly using BigQuery to access public datasets. What is BigQuery .

Description

This dataset contains 1,500 profiles of fictional characters, each described across 15 diverse and creative columns. The dataset offers a rich variety of character attributes and narrative elements, designed to support a wide range of Natural Language Processing (NLP), generative AI, and storytelling applications.

Columns include:

• Character Name

• Media Type (e.g., Novel, Movie, Webcomic, TV Show, Video Game)

• Media Source (fictional title/source)

• Genre (e.g., Fantasy, Sci-Fi, Mystery, Romance, Horror, Thriller)

• Role (e.g., Protagonist, Antagonist, Sidekick, Mentor, Villain, Hero)

• Personality Traits (comma-separated adjectives)

• Backstory (short narrative)

• Skills/Abilities (comma-separated)

• Appearance Description (physical summary)

• Alignment (Hero, Villain, Neutral)

• Interests/Hobbies

• Relationships (summary of key connections)

• Significance/Impact (their importance in the story)

• Description (detailed narrative)

• Scenario/Dialogue Example (sample interaction or scenario)

Potential Uses:

• Training and benchmarking NLP models (classification, entity recognition, summarization)
• Building and testing generative AI and chatbots
• Storytelling, creative writing, and game design prototyping
• Character analysis and clustering

Key Features:

• 1,500 unique, non-repeating character entries
• All data is synthetic and safe for public use
• Rich narrative and categorical diversity

Data Fields

Inspiration

Fictional character datasets are valuable for advancing research in text generation, character modeling, and creative AI. This dataset is ideal for anyone looking to experiment with synthetic narrative data, prototype new storytelling tools, or benchmark NLP models on character-driven content.

Acknowledgements

Data generated using Python Faker and randomization.

No real persons or copyrighted works are included.

Licensing

CC0: Public Domain. This dataset is fully free to use for any purpose.

You can copy and adapt this structure for your Kaggle submission. It clearly explains what the dataset is, how it was built, what each column means, and why it might be useful to the community.

Introduction

The Free-living Food Intake Cycle (FreeFIC) dataset was created by the Multimedia Understanding Group towards the investigation of in-the-wild eating behavior. This is achieved by recording the subjects’ meals as a small part part of their everyday life, unscripted, activities. The FreeFIC dataset contains the (3D) acceleration and orientation velocity signals ((6) DoF) from (22) in-the-wild sessions provided by (12) unique subjects. All sessions were recorded using a commercial smartwatch ((6) using the Huawei Watch 2™ and the MobVoi TicWatch™ for the rest) while the participants performed their everyday activities. In addition, FreeFIC also contains the start and end moments of each meal session as reported by the participants.

Description

FreeFIC includes (22) in-the-wild sessions that belong to (12) unique subjects. Participants were instructed to wear the smartwatch to the hand of their preference well ahead before any meal and continue to wear it throughout the day until the battery is depleted. In addition, we followed a self-report labeling model, meaning that the ground truth is provided from the participant by documenting the start and end moments of their meals to the best of their abilities as well as the hand they wear the smartwatch on. The total duration of the (22) recordings sums up to (112.71) hours, with a mean duration of (5.12) hours. Additional data statistics can be obtained by executing the provided python script stats_dataset.py. Furthermore, the accompanying python script viz_dataset.py will visualize the IMU signals and ground truth intervals for each of the recordings. Information on how to execute the Python scripts can be found below.

The script(s) and the pickle file must be located in the same directory.

Tested with Python 3.6.4

Requirements: Numpy, Pickle and Matplotlib

Calculate and echo dataset statistics

$ python stats_dataset.py

Visualize signals and ground truth

$ python viz_dataset.py

FreeFIC is also tightly related to Food Intake Cycle (FIC), a dataset we created in order to investigate the in-meal eating behavior. More information about FIC can be found here and here.

Publications

If you plan to use the FreeFIC dataset or any of the resources found in this page, please cite our work:

@article{kyritsis2020data,
title={A Data Driven End-to-end Approach for In-the-wild Monitoring of Eating Behavior Using Smartwatches},
author={Kyritsis, Konstantinos and Diou, Christos and Delopoulos, Anastasios},
journal={IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics}, year={2020},
publisher={IEEE}}

@inproceedings{kyritsis2017automated, title={Detecting Meals In the Wild Using the Inertial Data of a Typical Smartwatch}, author={Kyritsis, Konstantinos and Diou, Christos and Delopoulos, Anastasios}, booktitle={2019 41th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)},
year={2019}, organization={IEEE}}

Technical details

We provide the FreeFIC dataset as a pickle. The file can be loaded using Python in the following way:

import pickle as pkl import numpy as np

with open('./FreeFIC_FreeFIC-heldout.pkl','rb') as fh: dataset = pkl.load(fh)

The dataset variable in the snipet above is a dictionary with (5) keys. Namely:

'subject_id'

'session_id'

'signals_raw'

'signals_proc'

'meal_gt'

The contents under a specific key can be obtained by:

sub = dataset['subject_id'] # for the subject id ses = dataset['session_id'] # for the session id raw = dataset['signals_raw'] # for the raw IMU signals proc = dataset['signals_proc'] # for the processed IMU signals gt = dataset['meal_gt'] # for the meal ground truth

The sub, ses, raw, proc and gt variables in the snipet above are lists with a length equal to (22). Elements across all lists are aligned; e.g., the (3)rd element of the list under the 'session_id' key corresponds to the (3)rd element of the list under the 'signals_proc' key.

sub: list Each element of the sub list is a scalar (integer) that corresponds to the unique identifier of the subject that can take the following values: ([1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]). It should be emphasized that the subjects with ids (15, 16, 17, 18, 19) and (20) belong to the held-out part of the FreeFIC dataset (more information can be found in ( )the publication titled "A Data Driven End-to-end Approach for In-the-wild Monitoring of Eating Behavior Using Smartwatches" by Kyritsis et al). Moreover, the subject identifier in FreeFIC is in-line with the subject identifier in the FIC dataset (more info here and here); i.e., FIC’s subject with id equal to (2) is the same person as FreeFIC’s subject with id equal to (2).

ses: list Each element of this list is a scalar (integer) that corresponds to the unique identifier of the session that can range between (1) and (5). It should be noted that not all subjects have the same number of sessions.

raw: list Each element of this list is dictionary with the 'acc' and 'gyr' keys. The data under the 'acc' key is a (N_{acc} \times 4) numpy.ndarray that contains the timestamps in seconds (first column) and the (3D) raw accelerometer measurements in (g) (second, third and forth columns - representing the (x, y ) and (z) axis, respectively). The data under the 'gyr' key is a (N_{gyr} \times 4) numpy.ndarray that contains the timestamps in seconds (first column) and the (3D) raw gyroscope measurements in ({degrees}/{second})(second, third and forth columns - representing the (x, y ) and (z) axis, respectively). All sensor streams are transformed in such a way that reflects all participants wearing the smartwatch at the same hand with the same orientation, thusly achieving data uniformity. This transformation is in par with the signals in the FIC dataset (more info here and here). Finally, the length of the raw accelerometer and gyroscope numpy.ndarrays is different ((N_{acc} eq N_{gyr})). This behavior is predictable and is caused by the Android platform.

proc: list Each element of this list is an (M\times7) numpy.ndarray that contains the timestamps, (3D) accelerometer and gyroscope measurements for each meal. Specifically, the first column contains the timestamps in seconds, the second, third and forth columns contain the (x,y) and (z) accelerometer values in (g) and the fifth, sixth and seventh columns contain the (x,y) and (z) gyroscope values in ({degrees}/{second}). Unlike elements in the raw list, processed measurements (in the proc list) have a constant sampling rate of (100) Hz and the accelerometer/gyroscope measurements are aligned with each other. In addition, all sensor streams are transformed in such a way that reflects all participants wearing the smartwatch at the same hand with the same orientation, thusly achieving data uniformity. This transformation is in par with the signals in the FIC dataset (more info here and here). No other preprocessing is performed on the data; e.g., the acceleration component due to the Earth's gravitational field is present at the processed acceleration measurements. The potential researcher can consult the article "A Data Driven End-to-end Approach for In-the-wild Monitoring of Eating Behavior Using Smartwatches" by Kyritsis et al. on how to further preprocess the IMU signals (i.e., smooth and remove the gravitational component).

meal_gt: list Each element of this list is a (K\times2) matrix. Each row represents the meal intervals for the specific in-the-wild session. The first column contains the timestamps of the meal start moments whereas the second one the timestamps of the meal end moments. All timestamps are in seconds. The number of meals (K) varies across recordings (e.g., a recording exist where a participant consumed two meals).

Ethics and funding

Informed consent, including permission for third-party access to anonymised data, was obtained from all subjects prior to their engagement in the study. The work has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No 727688 - BigO: Big data against childhood obesity.

Contact

Any inquiries regarding the FreeFIC dataset should be addressed to:

Dr. Konstantinos KYRITSIS

Multimedia Understanding Group (MUG) Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Aristotle University of Thessaloniki University Campus, Building C, 3rd floor Thessaloniki, Greece, GR54124

Tel: +30 2310 996359, 996365 Fax: +30 2310 996398 E-mail: kokirits [at] mug [dot] ee [dot] auth [dot] gr

A. SUMMARY This dataset delineates parcels with “Taxable Commercial Space” - meaning parcels where one or more property owner(s) and/or commercial tenant(s) are required to file or pay the Commercial Vacancy Tax. The dataset includes the Block, Lot, Parcel Number and Parcel Situs Address for each commercial parcel within the named Districts. Information about each filing received for the parcel is included, such as Filer Type (Owner / Tenant), Filer Name, Parcel Situs Address from the Filing, and Tax Year filed. The dataset also includes whether a parcel is vacant, and if so, the tax rate applied. A single parcel may have multiple addresses and/or filings depending on the number of units and access points. Parcels marked as vacant either reported as vacant in the tax filing or were determined to be vacant by the Tax Collector. All information displayed is subject to audit by the Tax Collector.

If you are a taxpayer and need to update the information displayed, you should re-file https://sftreasurer.org/CommercialVacancy or contact the Tax Collector for assistance.

If you wish to share information about a vacant property subject to the Commercial Vacancy Tax with the Tax Collector to assist with enforcement, visit https://sftreasurer.org/report-vacant-commercial-property

B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED This dataset delineates parcels with “Taxable Commercial Space” - meaning parcels where one or more property owner(s) and/or commercial tenant(s) are required to file or pay the Commercial Vacancy Tax. The dataset includes the Block, Lot, Parcel Number and Parcel Situs Address for each commercial parcel within the named Districts. Information about each filing received for the parcel is included, such as Filer Type (Owner / Tenant), Filer Name, Parcel Situs Address from Filing, Tax Year filed, whether the filer reported a vacancy, and if so, the tax rate applied. A single parcel may have multiple addresses and/or filings depending on the number of units and access points. The information displayed is reported by the taxpayers and subject to audit by the Tax Collector.

C. UPDATE PROCESS Data will be refreshed daily until further notice.

D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET The Commercial Vacancy Tax dataset provides detailed information on commercial properties in San Francisco’s designated Neighborhood Commercial Districts and Neighborhood Commercial Transit Districts that are subject to the Commercial Vacancy Tax. This dataset includes key identifiers such as Block, Lot, Parcel Number, and Situs Address for each commercial parcel. It also lists information for each filing received from property owners, and tenants, including whether the filer reported a space as vacant and, if so, the applicable tax rate. Users can utilize this dataset to identify vacant commercial spaces and assess tax compliance.

E. RELATED DATASETS Registered business location – San Francisco San Francisco Property Information Map Assessor Block Maps

F. KNOWN USES The Commercial Vacancy Tax dataset is primarily used by the San Francisco Office of the Treasurer & Tax Collector to monitor compliance with the city’s Commercial Vacancy Tax ordinance. It supports enforcement by identifying Commercial Space that may be subject to the tax and verifying reported vacancy status. Additionally, researchers, journalists, and community organizations access the data to study the impacts of vacant storefronts.

Context

The early identification of students facing learning difficulties is one of the most critical challenges in modern education. Intervening effectively requires leveraging data to understand the complex interplay between student demographics, engagement patterns, and academic performance.

This dataset was created to serve as a high-quality, pre-processed resource for building machine learning models to tackle this very problem. It is a unique hybrid dataset, meticulously crafted by unifying three distinct sources:

The Open University Learning Analytics Dataset (OULAD): A rich dataset detailing student interactions with a Virtual Learning Environment (VLE). We have aggregated the raw, granular data (over 10 million interaction logs) into powerful features, such as total clicks, average assessment scores, and distinct days of activity for each student registration.

The UCI Student Performance Dataset: A classic educational dataset containing demographic information and final grades in Portuguese and Math subjects from two Portuguese schools.

A Synthetic Data Component: A synthetically generated portion of the data, created to balance the dataset or represent specific student profiles.

Data Unification and Pre-processing

A direct merge of these sources was not possible as the student identifiers were not shared. Instead, a strategy of intelligent concatenation was employed. The final dataset has undergone a rigorous pre-processing pipeline to make it immediately usable for machine learning tasks:

• Advanced Imputation: Missing values were handled using a sophisticated iterative imputation method powered by Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM), ensuring the dataset's integrity.

• One-Hot Encoding: All categorical features have been converted to a numerical format.

• Feature Scaling: All numerical features have been standardized (using StandardScaler) to have a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1, preventing model bias from features with different scales.

The result is a clean, comprehensive dataset ready for modeling.

File Information

Instance

Each row represents a student profile, and the columns are the features and the target.

Feature

Features include aggregated online engagement metrics (e.g., clicks, distinct activities), academic performance (grades, scores), and student demographics (e.g., gender, age band). A key feature indicates the original data source (OULAD, UCI, Synthetic).

Sensitive Information

The dataset contains no Personally Identifiable Information (PII). Demographic information is presented in broad, anonymized categories.

Key Columns:

Target Variable:

  had_difficulty: The primary target for classification. This binary variable has been engineered from the original final_result column of the OULAD dataset.

    1: The student either failed (Fail) or withdrew (Withdrawn) from the course.

    0: The student passed (Pass or Distinction).

Feature Groups:

  OULAD Aggregated Features (e.g., oulad_total_cliques, oulad_media_notas): Quantitative metrics summarizing a student's engagement and performance within the VLE.

  Academic Performance Features (e.g., nota_matematica_harmonizada): Harmonized grades from different data sources.

  Demographic Features (e.g., gender_*, age_band_*): One-hot encoded columns representing student demographics.

  Origin Features (e.g., origem_dado_OULAD, origem_dado_UCI): One-hot encoded columns indicating the original source of the data for each row. This allows for source-specific analysis.

(Note: All numerical feature names are post-scaling and may not directly reflect their original names. Please refer to the complete column list for details.)

Acknowledgements

This dataset would not be possible without the original data providers. Please acknowledge them in any work that uses this data:

OULAD Dataset: Kuzilek, J., Hlosta, M., and Zdrahal, Z. (2017). Open University Learning Analytics dataset. Scientific Data, 4. https://analyse.kmi.open.ac.uk/open_dataset

UCI Student Performance Dataset: P. Cortez and A. Silva. Using Data Mining to Predict Secondary School Student Performance. In A. Brito and J. Teixeira Eds., Proceedings of 5th FUture BUsiness TEChnology Conference (FUBUTEC 2008) pp. 5-12, Porto, Portugal, April, 2008, EUROSIS. https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/student+performance

Inspiration

This dataset is perfect for a variety of predictive modeling tasks. Here are a few ideas to get you started:

Can you build a classification model to predict had_difficulty with high recall? (Minimizing the number of at-risk students we fail to identify).

• Which features are the most powerful predictors of student failure or withdrawal? (Feature Importance Analysis).

• Can you build separate models for each data origin (origem_dado_*) and compare ...

Abstract

Motivation: creating challenging dataset for testing Named-Entity

Linking. The Namesakes dataset consists of three closely related datasets: Entities, News and Backlinks. Entities were collected as Wikipedia text chunks corresponding to highly ambiguous entity names. The News were collected as random news text chunks, containing mentions that either belong to the Entities dataset or can be easily confused with them. Backlinks were obtained from Wikipedia dump data with intention to have mentions linked to the entities of the Entity dataset. The Entities and News are human-labeled, resolving the mentions of the entities.Methods

Entities were collected as Wikipedia 

text chunks corresponding to highly ambiguous entity names: the most popular people names, the most popular locations, and organizations with name ambiguity. In each Entities text chunk, the named entities with the name similar to the chunk Wikipedia page name are labeled. For labeling, these entities were suggested to human annotators (odetta.ai) to tag as "Same" (same as the page entity) or "Other". The labeling was done by 6 experienced annotators that passed through a preliminary trial task. The only accepted tags are the tags assigned in agreement by not less than 5 annotators, and then passed through reconciliation with an experienced reconciliator.

The News were collected as random news text chunks, containing mentions which either belong to the Entities dataset or can be easily confused with them. In each News text chunk one mention was selected for labeling, and 3-10 Wikipedia pages from Entities were suggested as the labels for an annotator to choose from. The labeling was done by 3 experienced annotators (odetta.ai), after the annotators passed a preliminary trial task. The results were reconciled by an experienced reconciliator. All the labeling was done using Lighttag (lighttag.io).

Backlinks were obtained from Wikipedia dump data (dumps.wikimedia.org/enwiki/20210701) with intention to have mentions linked to the entities of the Entity dataset. The backlinks were filtered to leave only mentions in a good quality text; each text was cut 1000 characters after the last mention.

Usage NotesEntities:

File: Namesakes_entities.jsonl The Entities dataset consists of 4148 Wikipedia text chunks containing human-tagged mentions of entities. Each mention is tagged either as "Same" (meaning that the mention is of this Wikipedia page entity), or "Other" (meaning that the mention is of some other entity, just having the same or similar name). The Entities dataset is a jsonl list, each item is a dictionary with the following keys and values: Key: ‘pagename’: page name of the Wikipedia page. Key ‘pageid’: page id of the Wikipedia page. Key ‘title’: title of the Wikipedia page. Key ‘url’: URL of the Wikipedia page. Key ‘text’: The text chunk from the Wikipedia page. Key ‘entities’: list of the mentions in the page text, each entity is represented by a dictionary with the keys: Key 'text': the mention as a string from the page text. Key ‘start’: start character position of the entity in the text. Key ‘end’: end (one-past-last) character position of the entity in the text. Key ‘tag’: annotation tag given as a string - either ‘Same’ or ‘Other’.

News: File: Namesakes_news.jsonl The News dataset consists of 1000 news text chunks, each one with a single annotated entity mention. The annotation either points to the corresponding entity from the Entities dataset (if the mention is of that entity), or indicates that the mentioned entity does not belong to the Entities dataset. The News dataset is a jsonl list, each item is a dictionary with the following keys and values: Key ‘id_text’: Id of the sample. Key ‘text’: The text chunk. Key ‘urls’: List of URLs of wikipedia entities suggested to labelers for identification of the entity mentioned in the text. Key ‘entity’: a dictionary describing the annotated entity mention in the text: Key 'text': the mention as a string found by an NER model in the text. Key ‘start’: start character position of the mention in the text. Key ‘end’: end (one-past-last) character position of the mention in the text. Key 'tag': This key exists only if the mentioned entity is annotated as belonging to the Entities dataset - if so, the value is a dictionary identifying the Wikipedia page assigned by annotators to the mentioned entity: Key ‘pageid’: Wikipedia page id. Key ‘pagetitle’: page title. Key 'url': page URL.

Backlinks dataset: The Backlinks dataset consists of two parts: dictionary Entity-to-Backlinks and Backlinks documents. The dictionary points to backlinks for each entity of the Entity dataset (if any backlinks exist for the entity). The Backlinks documents are the backlinks Wikipedia text chunks with identified mentions of the entities from the Entities dataset.

Each mention is identified by surrounded double square brackets, e.g. "Muir built a small cabin along [[Yosemite Creek]].". However, if the mention differs from the exact entity name, the double square brackets wrap both the exact name and, separated by '|', the mention string to the right, for example: "Muir also spent time with photographer [[Carleton E. Watkins | Carleton Watkins]] and studied his photographs of Yosemite.".

The Entity-to-Backlinks is a jsonl with 1527 items. File: Namesakes_backlinks_entities.jsonl Each item is a tuple: Entity name. Entity Wikipedia page id. Backlinks ids: a list of pageids of backlink documents.

The Backlinks documents is a jsonl with 26903 items. File: Namesakes_backlinks_texts.jsonl Each item is a dictionary: Key ‘pageid’: Id of the Wikipedia page. Key ‘title’: Title of the Wikipedia page. Key 'content': Text chunk from the Wikipedia page, with all mentions in the double brackets; the text is cut 1000 characters after the last mention, the cut is denoted as '...[CUT]'. Key 'mentions': List of the mentions from the text, for convenience. Each mention is a tuple: Entity name. Entity Wikipedia page id. Sorted list of all character indexes at which the mention occurrences start in the text.

Article Information

The work involved in developing the dataset and benchmarking its use of machine learning is set out in the article ‘IoMT-TrafficData: Dataset and Tools for Benchmarking Intrusion Detection in Internet of Medical Things’. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3437214.

Please do cite the aforementioned article when using this dataset.

Abstract

The increasing importance of securing the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) due to its vulnerabilities to cyber-attacks highlights the need for an effective intrusion detection system (IDS). In this study, our main objective was to develop a Machine Learning Model for the IoMT to enhance the security of medical devices and protect patients’ private data. To address this issue, we built a scenario that utilised the Internet of Things (IoT) and IoMT devices to simulate real-world attacks. We collected and cleaned data, pre-processed it, and provided it into our machine-learning model to detect intrusions in the network. Our results revealed significant improvements in all performance metrics, indicating robustness and reproducibility in real-world scenarios. This research has implications in the context of IoMT and cybersecurity, as it helps mitigate vulnerabilities and lowers the number of breaches occurring with the rapid growth of IoMT devices. The use of machine learning algorithms for intrusion detection systems is essential, and our study provides valuable insights and a road map for future research and the deployment of such systems in live environments. By implementing our findings, we can contribute to a safer and more secure IoMT ecosystem, safeguarding patient privacy and ensuring the integrity of medical data.

ZIP Folder Content

The ZIP folder comprises two main components: Captures and Datasets. Within the captures folder, we have included all the captures used in this project. These captures are organized into separate folders corresponding to the type of network analysis: BLE or IP-Based. Similarly, the datasets folder follows a similar organizational approach. It contains datasets categorized by type: BLE, IP-Based Packet, and IP-Based Flows.

To cater to diverse analytical needs, the datasets are provided in two formats: CSV (Comma-Separated Values) and pickle. The CSV format facilitates seamless integration with various data analysis tools, while the pickle format preserves the intricate structures and relationships within the dataset.

This organization enables researchers to easily locate and utilize the specific captures and datasets they require, based on their preferred network analysis type or dataset type. The availability of different formats further enhances the flexibility and usability of the provided data.

Datasets' Content

Within this dataset, three sub-datasets are available, namely BLE, IP-Based Packet, and IP-Based Flows. Below is a table of the features selected for each dataset and consequently used in the evaluation model within the provided work.

Identified Key Features Within Bluetooth Dataset

Feature Meaning

btle.advertising_header BLE Advertising Packet Header

btle.advertising_header.ch_sel BLE Advertising Channel Selection Algorithm

btle.advertising_header.length BLE Advertising Length

btle.advertising_header.pdu_type BLE Advertising PDU Type

btle.advertising_header.randomized_rx BLE Advertising Rx Address

btle.advertising_header.randomized_tx BLE Advertising Tx Address

btle.advertising_header.rfu.1 Reserved For Future 1

btle.advertising_header.rfu.2 Reserved For Future 2

btle.advertising_header.rfu.3 Reserved For Future 3

btle.advertising_header.rfu.4 Reserved For Future 4

btle.control.instant Instant Value Within a BLE Control Packet

btle.crc.incorrect Incorrect CRC

btle.extended_advertising Advertiser Data Information

btle.extended_advertising.did Advertiser Data Identifier

btle.extended_advertising.sid Advertiser Set Identifier

btle.length BLE Length

frame.cap_len Frame Length Stored Into the Capture File

frame.interface_id Interface ID

frame.len Frame Length Wire

nordic_ble.board_id Board ID

nordic_ble.channel Channel Index

nordic_ble.crcok Indicates if CRC is Correct

nordic_ble.flags Flags

nordic_ble.packet_counter Packet Counter

nordic_ble.packet_time Packet time (start to end)

nordic_ble.phy PHY

nordic_ble.protover Protocol Version

Identified Key Features Within IP-Based Packets Dataset

Feature Meaning

http.content_length Length of content in an HTTP response

http.request HTTP request being made

http.response.code Sequential number of an HTTP response

http.response_number Sequential number of an HTTP response

http.time Time taken for an HTTP transaction

tcp.analysis.initial_rtt Initial round-trip time for TCP connection

tcp.connection.fin TCP connection termination with a FIN flag

tcp.connection.syn TCP connection initiation with SYN flag

tcp.connection.synack TCP connection establishment with SYN-ACK flags

tcp.flags.cwr Congestion Window Reduced flag in TCP

tcp.flags.ecn Explicit Congestion Notification flag in TCP

tcp.flags.fin FIN flag in TCP

tcp.flags.ns Nonce Sum flag in TCP

tcp.flags.res Reserved flags in TCP

tcp.flags.syn SYN flag in TCP

tcp.flags.urg Urgent flag in TCP

tcp.urgent_pointer Pointer to urgent data in TCP

ip.frag_offset Fragment offset in IP packets

eth.dst.ig Ethernet destination is in the internal network group

eth.src.ig Ethernet source is in the internal network group

eth.src.lg Ethernet source is in the local network group

eth.src_not_group Ethernet source is not in any network group

arp.isannouncement Indicates if an ARP message is an announcement

Identified Key Features Within IP-Based Flows Dataset

Feature Meaning

proto Transport layer protocol of the connection

service Identification of an application protocol

orig_bytes Originator payload bytes

resp_bytes Responder payload bytes

history Connection state history

orig_pkts Originator sent packets

resp_pkts Responder sent packets

flow_duration Length of the flow in seconds

fwd_pkts_tot Forward packets total

bwd_pkts_tot Backward packets total

fwd_data_pkts_tot Forward data packets total

bwd_data_pkts_tot Backward data packets total

fwd_pkts_per_sec Forward packets per second

bwd_pkts_per_sec Backward packets per second

flow_pkts_per_sec Flow packets per second

fwd_header_size Forward header bytes

bwd_header_size Backward header bytes

fwd_pkts_payload Forward payload bytes

bwd_pkts_payload Backward payload bytes

flow_pkts_payload Flow payload bytes

fwd_iat Forward inter-arrival time

bwd_iat Backward inter-arrival time

flow_iat Flow inter-arrival time

active Flow active duration

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the mean household income for each of the five quintiles in Idaho County, ID, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in mean household income across quintiles, offering valuable insights into income distribution and inequality.

Key observations

• Income disparities: The mean income of the lowest quintile (20% of households with the lowest income) is 15,156, while the mean income for the highest quintile (20% of households with the highest income) is 180,473. This indicates that the top earners earn 12 times compared to the lowest earners.
• *Top 5%: * The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 313,940, which is 173.95% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 2071.39% higher compared to the lowest quintile.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income Levels:

• Lowest Quintile
• Second Quintile
• Third Quintile
• Fourth Quintile
• Highest Quintile
• Top 5 Percent

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Level: This column showcases the income levels (As mentioned above).
• Mean Household Income: Mean household income, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific income level.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Idaho County median household income. You can refer the same here

Techsalerator’s Sound and Audio Data for China

Techsalerator’s Sound and Audio Data for China provides a comprehensive and detailed collection of information essential for businesses, researchers, and technology developers. This dataset delivers an in-depth analysis of audio technologies, market trends, and industry developments in China, capturing and categorizing data related to sound engineering, acoustic research, and audio production.

For access to the full dataset, contact us at info@techsalerator.com or visit Techsalerator Contact Us.

Techsalerator’s Sound and Audio Data for China

Techsalerator’s Sound and Audio Data for China offers a thorough examination of key information for businesses, researchers, and audio engineers. This dataset provides insights into industry advancements, emerging technologies, and market dynamics within China’s expansive audio industry.

Top 5 Key Data Fields

• Company Name: Identifies businesses involved in the sound and audio sector, enabling industry professionals to track major players and potential collaborations.

• Audio Technology Type: Classifies technologies such as noise-canceling systems, spatial audio, high-fidelity sound processing, and AI-driven audio enhancements.

• Market Segmentation: Breaks down the industry by categories like consumer electronics, professional audio equipment, automotive sound systems, and smart audio solutions.

• Investment and Revenue Data: Details financial growth, funding rounds, and revenue streams of key companies, offering insights into the industry’s economic landscape.

• Regulatory Compliance: Documents Chinese government policies, licensing requirements, and industry standards shaping the sound and audio market.

Top 5 Trends in the Sound and Audio Industry in China

• AI-Driven Audio Processing: Companies are integrating AI to enhance sound quality, speech recognition, and personalized listening experiences.

• 3D and Spatial Audio: Increased adoption in gaming, virtual reality (VR), and home entertainment systems to create immersive sound experiences.

• Smart Audio Devices: Growth in smart speakers, wireless earbuds, and IoT-enabled audio solutions, driven by consumer demand for seamless connectivity.

• Sustainable Audio Technology: Development of eco-friendly sound equipment, focusing on energy efficiency and recyclable materials.

• High-Resolution Audio Streaming: Expansion of lossless and high-definition audio streaming services catering to audiophiles and music enthusiasts.

Top 5 Leading Companies in China’s Sound and Audio Industry

• Huawei Audio Labs: Innovating in AI-based sound enhancement and wireless audio technology.
• Xiaomi Sound: Producing smart speakers and high-fidelity audio solutions for consumer electronics.
• BYD Audio Systems: Developing cutting-edge automotive sound systems with advanced noise-canceling features.
• Tencent Music Entertainment: Leading in digital audio streaming with a focus on high-quality sound delivery.
• Goertek Inc.: A top provider of MEMS microphones and acoustic solutions for global audio markets.

Accessing Techsalerator’s Sound and Audio Data

To obtain Techsalerator’s Sound and Audio Data for China, contact info@techsalerator.com with your specific requirements. Techsalerator will provide a customized quote based on the required data fields and records, with delivery available within 24 hours. Ongoing access options can also be discussed.

Included Data Fields

• Company Name
• Audio Technology Type
• Market Segmentation
• Investment and Revenue Data
• Regulatory Compliance
• Patents and Innovations
• Product Offerings
• Consumer Demand Trends
• Competitive Landscape
• Contact Information

For detailed insights into sound and audio technologies in China, Techsalerator’s dataset is an invaluable resource for industry professionals, investors, and technology developers seeking data-driven strategic decisions.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the mean household income for each of the five quintiles in Iona, ID, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in mean household income across quintiles, offering valuable insights into income distribution and inequality.

Key observations

• Income disparities: The mean income of the lowest quintile (20% of households with the lowest income) is 23,265, while the mean income for the highest quintile (20% of households with the highest income) is 210,146. This indicates that the top earners earn 9 times compared to the lowest earners.
• *Top 5%: * The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 304,214, which is 144.76% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 1307.60% higher compared to the lowest quintile.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income Levels:

• Lowest Quintile
• Second Quintile
• Third Quintile
• Fourth Quintile
• Highest Quintile
• Top 5 Percent

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Level: This column showcases the income levels (As mentioned above).
• Mean Household Income: Mean household income, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific income level.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Iona median household income. You can refer the same here

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the mean household income for each of the five quintiles in Cedar Key, FL, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in mean household income across quintiles, offering valuable insights into income distribution and inequality.

Key observations

• Income disparities: The mean income of the lowest quintile (20% of households with the lowest income) is 9,765, while the mean income for the highest quintile (20% of households with the highest income) is 226,011. This indicates that the top earners earn 23 times compared to the lowest earners.
• *Top 5%: * The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 294,584, which is 130.34% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 3016.73% higher compared to the lowest quintile.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income Levels:

• Lowest Quintile
• Second Quintile
• Third Quintile
• Fourth Quintile
• Highest Quintile
• Top 5 Percent

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Level: This column showcases the income levels (As mentioned above).
• Mean Household Income: Mean household income, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific income level.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Cedar Key median household income. You can refer the same here

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the mean household income for each of the five quintiles in Castleford, ID, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in mean household income across quintiles, offering valuable insights into income distribution and inequality.

Key observations

• Income disparities: The mean income of the lowest quintile (20% of households with the lowest income) is 18,796, while the mean income for the highest quintile (20% of households with the highest income) is 79,542. This indicates that the top earners earn 4 times compared to the lowest earners.
• *Top 5%: * The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 113,850, which is 143.13% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 605.71% higher compared to the lowest quintile.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income Levels:

• Lowest Quintile
• Second Quintile
• Third Quintile
• Fourth Quintile
• Highest Quintile
• Top 5 Percent

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Level: This column showcases the income levels (As mentioned above).
• Mean Household Income: Mean household income, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific income level.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Castleford median household income. You can refer the same here

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the mean household income for each of the five quintiles in Longboat Key, FL, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in mean household income across quintiles, offering valuable insights into income distribution and inequality.

Key observations

• Income disparities: The mean income of the lowest quintile (20% of households with the lowest income) is 31,550, while the mean income for the highest quintile (20% of households with the highest income) is 738,131. This indicates that the top earners earn 23 times compared to the lowest earners.
• *Top 5%: * The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 1,404,832, which is 190.32% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 4452.72% higher compared to the lowest quintile.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income Levels:

• Lowest Quintile
• Second Quintile
• Third Quintile
• Fourth Quintile
• Highest Quintile
• Top 5 Percent

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Level: This column showcases the income levels (As mentioned above).
• Mean Household Income: Mean household income, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific income level.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Longboat Key median household income. You can refer the same here

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the mean household income for each of the five quintiles in Boise County, ID, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in mean household income across quintiles, offering valuable insights into income distribution and inequality.

Key observations

• Income disparities: The mean income of the lowest quintile (20% of households with the lowest income) is 24,182, while the mean income for the highest quintile (20% of households with the highest income) is 181,409. This indicates that the top earners earn 8 times compared to the lowest earners.
• *Top 5%: * The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 267,288, which is 147.34% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 1105.32% higher compared to the lowest quintile.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income Levels:

• Lowest Quintile
• Second Quintile
• Third Quintile
• Fourth Quintile
• Highest Quintile
• Top 5 Percent

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Level: This column showcases the income levels (As mentioned above).
• Mean Household Income: Mean household income, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific income level.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Boise County median household income. You can refer the same here

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the mean household income for each of the five quintiles in Key Biscayne, FL, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in mean household income across quintiles, offering valuable insights into income distribution and inequality.

Key observations

• Income disparities: The mean income of the lowest quintile (20% of households with the lowest income) is 24,134, while the mean income for the highest quintile (20% of households with the highest income) is 756,141. This indicates that the top earners earn 31 times compared to the lowest earners.
• *Top 5%: * The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 1,204,355, which is 159.28% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 4990.28% higher compared to the lowest quintile.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income Levels:

• Lowest Quintile
• Second Quintile
• Third Quintile
• Fourth Quintile
• Highest Quintile
• Top 5 Percent

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Level: This column showcases the income levels (As mentioned above).
• Mean Household Income: Mean household income, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific income level.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Key Biscayne median household income. You can refer the same here

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the mean household income for each of the five quintiles in Montpelier, ID, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in mean household income across quintiles, offering valuable insights into income distribution and inequality.

Key observations

• Income disparities: The mean income of the lowest quintile (20% of households with the lowest income) is 11,732, while the mean income for the highest quintile (20% of households with the highest income) is 165,064. This indicates that the top earners earn 14 times compared to the lowest earners.
• *Top 5%: * The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 245,938, which is 149% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 2096.30% higher compared to the lowest quintile.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income Levels:

• Lowest Quintile
• Second Quintile
• Third Quintile
• Fourth Quintile
• Highest Quintile
• Top 5 Percent

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Level: This column showcases the income levels (As mentioned above).
• Mean Household Income: Mean household income, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific income level.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Montpelier median household income. You can refer the same here

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the mean household income for each of the five quintiles in Star, ID, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in mean household income across quintiles, offering valuable insights into income distribution and inequality.

Key observations

• Income disparities: The mean income of the lowest quintile (20% of households with the lowest income) is 26,794, while the mean income for the highest quintile (20% of households with the highest income) is 252,997. This indicates that the top earners earn 9 times compared to the lowest earners.
• *Top 5%: * The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 453,494, which is 179.25% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 1692.52% higher compared to the lowest quintile.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income Levels:

• Lowest Quintile
• Second Quintile
• Third Quintile
• Fourth Quintile
• Highest Quintile
• Top 5 Percent

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Level: This column showcases the income levels (As mentioned above).
• Mean Household Income: Mean household income, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific income level.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Star median household income. You can refer the same here

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the mean household income for each of the five quintiles in Kellogg, ID, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in mean household income across quintiles, offering valuable insights into income distribution and inequality.

Key observations

• Income disparities: The mean income of the lowest quintile (20% of households with the lowest income) is 12,040, while the mean income for the highest quintile (20% of households with the highest income) is 139,047. This indicates that the top earners earn 12 times compared to the lowest earners.
• *Top 5%: * The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 221,026, which is 158.96% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 1835.76% higher compared to the lowest quintile.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income Levels:

• Lowest Quintile
• Second Quintile
• Third Quintile
• Fourth Quintile
• Highest Quintile
• Top 5 Percent

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Level: This column showcases the income levels (As mentioned above).
• Mean Household Income: Mean household income, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific income level.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Kellogg median household income. You can refer the same here