Vrinda Store: Interactive Ms Excel dashboardVrinda Store: Interactive Ms Excel dashboard Feb 2024 - Mar 2024Feb 2024 - Mar 2024 The owner of Vrinda store wants to create an annual sales report for 2022. So that their employees can understand their customers and grow more sales further. Questions asked by Owner of Vrinda store are as follows:- 1) Compare the sales and orders using single chart. 2) Which month got the highest sales and orders? 3) Who purchased more - women per men in 2022? 4) What are different order status in 2022?

And some other questions related to business. The owner of Vrinda store wanted a visual story of their data. Which can depict all the real time progress and sales insight of the store. This project is a Ms Excel dashboard which presents an interactive visual story to help the Owner and employees in increasing their sales. Task performed : Data cleaning, Data processing, Data analysis, Data visualization, Report. Tool used : Ms Excel The owner of Vrinda store wants to create an annual sales report for 2022. So that their employees can understand their customers and grow more sales further. Questions asked by Owner of Vrinda store are as follows:- 1) Compare the sales and orders using single chart. 2) Which month got the highest sales and orders? 3) Who purchased more - women per men in 2022? 4) What are different order status in 2022? And some other questions related to business. The owner of Vrinda store wanted a visual story of their data. Which can depict all the real time progress and sales insight of the store. This project is a Ms Excel dashboard which presents an interactive visual story to help the Owner and employees in increasing their sales. Task performed : Data cleaning, Data processing, Data analysis, Data visualization, Report. Tool used : Ms Excel Skills: Data Analysis · Data Analytics · ms excel · Pivot Tables

description: ABOUT THIS TOOL: The Better Building s Clean Energy for Low Income Communities Accelerator (CELICA) was launched in 2016 to help state and local partners across the nation meet their goals for increasing uptake of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies in low and moderate income communities. As a part of the Accelerator, DOE created this Low-Income Energy Affordability Data (LEAD) Tool to assist partners with understanding their LMI community characteristics. This can be utilized for low income and moderate income energy policy and program planning, as it provides interactive state, county and city level worksheets with graphs and data including number of households at different income levels and numbers of homeowners versus renters. It provides a breakdown based on fuel type, building type, and construction year. It also provides average monthly energy expenditures and energy burden (percentage of income spent on energy). HOW TO USE: The LEAD tool can be used to support program design and goal setting, and they can be paired with other data to improve LMI community energy benchmarking and program evaluation. Datasets are available for all 50 states, census divisions, and tract levels. You will have to enable macros in MS Excel to interact with the data. A description of each of the files and what states are included in each U.S. Census Division can be found in the file "DESCRIPTION OF FILES". For more information, visit: https://betterbuildingsinitiative.energy.gov/accelerators/clean-energy-low-income-communities; abstract: ABOUT THIS TOOL: The Better Building s Clean Energy for Low Income Communities Accelerator (CELICA) was launched in 2016 to help state and local partners across the nation meet their goals for increasing uptake of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies in low and moderate income communities. As a part of the Accelerator, DOE created this Low-Income Energy Affordability Data (LEAD) Tool to assist partners with understanding their LMI community characteristics. This can be utilized for low income and moderate income energy policy and program planning, as it provides interactive state, county and city level worksheets with graphs and data including number of households at different income levels and numbers of homeowners versus renters. It provides a breakdown based on fuel type, building type, and construction year. It also provides average monthly energy expenditures and energy burden (percentage of income spent on energy). HOW TO USE: The LEAD tool can be used to support program design and goal setting, and they can be paired with other data to improve LMI community energy benchmarking and program evaluation. Datasets are available for all 50 states, census divisions, and tract levels. You will have to enable macros in MS Excel to interact with the data. A description of each of the files and what states are included in each U.S. Census Division can be found in the file "DESCRIPTION OF FILES". For more information, visit: https://betterbuildingsinitiative.energy.gov/accelerators/clean-energy-low-income-communities

Over the last 20 years, statistics preparation has become vital for a broad range of scientific fields, and statistics coursework has been readily incorporated into undergraduate and graduate programs. However, a gap remains between the computational skills taught in statistics service courses and those required for the use of statistics in scientific research. Ten years after the publication of "Computing in the Statistics Curriculum,'' the nature of statistics continues to change, and computing skills are more necessary than ever for modern scientific researchers. In this paper, we describe research on the design and implementation of a suite of data science workshops for environmental science graduate students, providing students with the skills necessary to retrieve, view, wrangle, visualize, and analyze their data using reproducible tools. These workshops help to bridge the gap between the computing skills necessary for scientific research and the computing skills with which students leave their statistics service courses. Moreover, though targeted to environmental science graduate students, these workshops are open to the larger academic community. As such, they promote the continued learning of the computational tools necessary for working with data, and provide resources for incorporating data science into the classroom.

Methods Surveys from Carpentries style workshops the results of which are presented in the accompanying manuscript.

Pre- and post-workshop surveys for each workshop (Introduction to R, Intermediate R, Data Wrangling in R, Data Visualization in R) were collected via Google Form.

The surveys administered for the fall 2018, spring 2019 academic year are included as pre_workshop_survey and post_workshop_assessment PDF files. 
The raw versions of these data are included in the Excel files ending in survey_raw or assessment_raw.

  The data files whose name includes survey contain raw data from pre-workshop surveys and the data files whose name includes assessment contain raw data from the post-workshop assessment survey.


The annotated RMarkdown files used to clean the pre-workshop surveys and post-workshop assessments are included as workshop_survey_cleaning and workshop_assessment_cleaning, respectively. 
The cleaned pre- and post-workshop survey data are included in the Excel files ending in clean. 
The summaries and visualizations presented in the manuscript are included in the analysis annotated RMarkdown file.

This project focuses on data mapping, integration, and analysis to support the development and enhancement of six UNCDF operational applications: OrgTraveler, Comms Central, Internal Support Hub, Partnership 360, SmartHR, and TimeTrack. These apps streamline workflows for travel claims, internal support, partnership management, and time tracking within UNCDF.Key Features and Tools:Data Mapping for Salesforce CRM Migration: Structured and mapped data flows to ensure compatibility and seamless migration to Salesforce CRM.Python for Data Cleaning and Transformation: Utilized pandas, numpy, and APIs to clean, preprocess, and transform raw datasets into standardized formats.Power BI Dashboards: Designed interactive dashboards to visualize workflows and monitor performance metrics for decision-making.Collaboration Across Platforms: Integrated Google Collab for code collaboration and Microsoft Excel for data validation and analysis.

📊 Instagram Reach Analysis | تحليل الوصول في إنستغرام

An exploratory data analysis project using Excel to understand what influences Instagram post reach and engagement.
مشروع تحليل استكشافي لفهم العوامل المؤثرة في وصول منشورات إنستغرام وتفاعل المستخدمين، باستخدام Excel.

📁 Project Description | وصف المشروع

This project uses an Instagram dataset imported from Kaggle to explore how different factors like hashtags, saves, shares, and caption length influence impressions and engagement.
يستخدم هذا المشروع بيانات من إنستغرام تم استيرادها من منصة Kaggle لتحليل كيف تؤثر عوامل مثل الهاشتاقات، الحفظ، المشاركة، وطول التسمية التوضيحية في عدد مرات الظهور والتفاعل.

🛠️ Tools Used | الأدوات المستخدمة

• Microsoft Excel
• Pivot Tables
• TRIM, WRAP, and other Excel formulas
• مايكروسوفت إكسل
• الجداول المحورية
• دوال مثل TRIM و WRAP وغيرها في Excel

🧹 Data Cleaning | تنظيف البيانات

• Removed unnecessary spaces using TRIM
• Removed 17 duplicate rows → 103 unique rows remained

• Standardized formatting: freeze top row, wrap text, center align

• إزالة المسافات غير الضرورية باستخدام TRIM

• حذف 17 صفًا مكررًا → تبقى 103 صفوف فريدة

• تنسيق موحد: تثبيت الصف الأول، لف النص، وتوسيط المحتوى

🔍 Key Analysis Highlights | أبرز نتائج التحليل

1. Impressions by Source | مرات الظهور حسب المصدر

• Highest reach: Home > Hashtags > Explore > Other
• Some totals exceed 100% due to overlapping

2. Engagement Insights | رؤى حول التفاعل

• Saves strongly correlate with higher impressions
• Caption length is inversely related to likes
• Shares have weak correlation with impressions

3. Hashtag Patterns | تحليل الهاشتاقات

• Most used: #Thecleverprogrammer, #Amankharwal, #Python
• Repeating hashtags does not guarantee higher reach

✅ Conclusion | الخلاصة

Shorter captions and higher save counts contribute more to reach than repeated hashtags. Profile visits are often linked to new followers.
العناوين القصيرة وعدد الحفظات تلعب دورًا أكبر في الوصول من تكرار الهاشتاقات. كما أن زيارات الملف الشخصي ترتبط غالبًا بزيادة المتابعين.

👩‍💻 Author | المؤلفة

Raghad's LinkedIn

🧠 Inspiration | الإلهام

Inspired by content from TheCleverProgrammer, Aman Kharwal, and Kaggle datasets.
استُلهم المشروع من محتوى TheCleverProgrammer وأمان خروال، وبيانات من Kaggle.

💬 Feedback | الملاحظات

Feel free to open an issue or share suggestions!
يسعدنا تلقي ملاحظاتكم واقتراحاتكم عبر صفحة المشروع.

CEEAT MS Excel-based and uses an input-output (I-O) table-based approach to estimate the economy-wide net direct, indirect and induced employment impacts of various clean energy technology pathways, with a focus on the electricity sector. *Please note that the default setting is set to Morocco. Please enter data from your country of interest.

About the Dataset

Title: 9,565 Top-Rated Movies Dataset

Description:
This dataset offers a comprehensive collection of 9,565 of the highest-rated movies according to audience ratings on the Movie Database (TMDb). The dataset includes detailed information about each movie, such as its title, overview, release date, popularity score, average vote, and vote count. It is designed to be a valuable resource for anyone interested in exploring trends in popular cinema, analyzing factors that contribute to a movie’s success, or building recommendation engines.

Key Features: - Title: The official title of each movie. - Overview: A brief synopsis or description of the movie's plot. - Release Date: The release date of the movie, formatted as YYYY-MM-DD. - Popularity: A score indicating the current popularity of the movie on TMDb, which can be used to gauge current interest. - Vote Average: The average rating of the movie, based on user votes. - Vote Count: The total number of votes the movie has received.

Data Source: The data was sourced from the TMDb API, a well-regarded platform for movie information, using the /movie/top_rated endpoint. The dataset represents a snapshot of the highest-rated movies as of the time of data collection.

Data Collection Process: - API Access: Data was retrieved programmatically using TMDb’s API. - Pagination Handling: Multiple API requests were made to cover all pages of top-rated movies, ensuring the dataset’s comprehensiveness. - Data Aggregation: Collected data was aggregated into a single, unified dataset using the pandas library. - Cleaning: Basic data cleaning was performed to remove duplicates and handle missing or malformed data entries.

Potential Uses: - Trend Analysis: Analyze trends in movie ratings over time or compare ratings across different genres. - Recommendation Systems: Build and train models to recommend movies based on user preferences. - Sentiment Analysis: Perform text analysis on movie overviews to understand common themes and sentiments. - Statistical Analysis: Explore the relationship between popularity, vote count, and average ratings.

Data Format: The dataset is provided in a structured tabular format (e.g., CSV), making it easy to load into data analysis tools like Python, R, or Excel.

Usage License: The dataset is shared under [appropriate license], ensuring that it can be used for educational, research, or commercial purposes, with proper attribution to the data source (TMDb).

This description provides a clear and detailed overview, helping potential users understand the dataset's content, origin, and potential applications.

Abstract

A Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) survey was conducted in Ajuong Thok and Pamir Refugee Camps in October 2019 to determine the current Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) conditions as well as hygiene attitudes and practices within the households (HHs) surveyed. The assessment utilized a systematic random sampling method, and a total of 1,474 HHs (735 HHs in Ajuong Thok and 739 HHs in Pamir) were surveyed using mobile data collection (MDC) within a period of 21 days. Data was cleaned and analyzed in Excel. The summary of the results is presented in this report.

The findings show that the overall average number of liters of water per person per day was 23.4, in both Ajuong Thok and Pamir Camps, which was slightly higher than the recommended United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) minimum standard of at least 20 liters of water available per person per day. This is a slight improvement from the 21 liters reported the previous year. The average HH size was six people. Women comprised 83% of the surveyed respondents and males 17%. Almost all the respondents were refugees, constituting 99.5% (n=1,466). The refugees were aware of the key health and hygiene practices, possibly as a result of routine health and hygiene messages delivered to them by Samaritan´s Purse (SP) and other health partners. Most refugees had knowledge about keeping the water containers clean, washing hands during critical times, safe excreta disposal and disease prevention.

Geographic coverage

Ajuong Thok and Pamir Refugee Camps

Analysis unit

Households

Universe

All households in Ajuong Thok and Pamir Refugee Camps

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

Households were selected using systematic random sampling. Enumerators systematically walked through the camp block by block, row by row, in such a way as to pass each HH. Within blocks, enumerators started at one corner, then systematically used the sampling interval as they walked up and down each of the rows throughout the block, covering every block in Ajuong Thok and Pamir.

In each location, the first HH sampled in a block was generated using an Excel tool customized by UNHCR which generated a Random Start and Sampling Interval.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

The survey questionnaire used to collect the data consists of the following sections: - Demographics - Water collection and storage - Drinking water hygiene - Hygiene - Sanitation - Messaging - Distribution (NFI) - Diarrhea prevalence, knowledge and health seeking behaviour - Menstrual hygiene

Cleaning operations

The data collected was uploaded to a server at the end of each day. IFormBuilder generated a Microsoft (MS) Excel spreadsheet dataset which was then cleaned and analyzed using MS Excel.

Given that SP is currently implementing a WASH program in Ajuong Thok and Pamir, the assessment data collected in these camps will not only serve as the endline for UNHCR 2018 programming but also as the baseline for 2019 programming.

Data was anonymized through decoding and local suppression.

Abstract

Digital clinical decision support algorithms (CDSAs) that guide healthcare workers during consultations can enhance adherence to guidelines and the resulting quality of care. However, this improvement depends on the accuracy of inputs (symptoms and signs) entered by healthcare workers into the digital tool, which relies mainly on their clinical skills, that are often limited, especially in resource-constrained primary care settings. This study aimed to identify and characterize potential clinical skill gaps based on CDSA data patterns and clinical observations. We retrospectively analyzed data from 20,085 pediatric consultations conducted using an IMCI-based CDSA in 16 primary health centers in Rwanda. We focused on clinical signs with numerical values: temperature, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), weight, height, z-scores (MUAC for age, weight for age, and weight for height), heart rate, respiratory rate and blood oxygen saturation. Statistical summary measures (frequency of skipped measurements, frequent plausible and implausible values) and their variation in individual health centers compared to the overall average were used to identify 10 health centers with irregular data patterns signaling potential clinical skill gaps. We subsequently observed 188 consultations in these health centers and interviewed healthcare workers to understand potential error causes. Observations indicated basic measurements not being assessed correctly in most children; weight (70%), MUAC (69%), temperature (67%), height (54%). These measures were predominantly conducted by minimally trained non-clinical staff in the registration area. More complex measures, done mostly by healthcare workers in the consultation room, were often skipped: respiratory rate (43%), heart rate (37%), blood oxygen saturation (33%). This was linked to underestimating the importance of these signs in child management, especially in the context of high patient loads typical at primary care level. Addressing clinical skill gaps through in-person training, eLearning and regular personalized mentoring tailored to specific health center needs is imperative to improve quality of care and enhance the benefits of CDSAs.

Geographic coverage

16 primary healthcare centers (HCs) of Rusizi and Nyamasheke districts in Rwanda.

Analysis unit

First dataset was collected directly by the ePOCT+ CDSA during 20,085 pediatric consultations across 16 primary health centers in Rwanda. It includes anonymized patient, healthfacility and consultation data with key clinical measurements (temperature, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), weight, height, MUAC for age z-score, weight for age z-score, weight for height z-score, heart rate, respiratory rate and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2).) Second dataset results from structured observations of 188 routine pediatric consultations at a subset of 10 health facilities. Clinicians used a standardized evaluation form to record clinical measurements, mirroring variables in the first dataset. This dataset is used to deepen the analysis from the primary dataset by understanding the reason for the patterns appearing from the quantitative analysis of the first dataset.

Universe

Children aged 1 day to 14 years with an acute condition, in the 16 HCs where the intervention was deployed.

Kind of data

Clinical data [cli]

Sampling procedure

First dataset: ePOCT+ stores all the information (date of consultation, anthropometric measures, vitals, presence/absence of specific symptoms and signs prompted by the algorithm, diagnoses, medicines, managements, etc.) entered by the HW in the tablet during consultations. We retrospectively analyzed data from 20,085 outpatient consultations conducted between November 2021 and October 2022 with children aged 1 day to 14 years with an acute condition, in the 16 HCs where the intervention was deployed. Data cleaning, management, and analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.2.1). Second dataset: Based on the results of the retrospective analysis, we observed 188 routine consultations in a subset of 10 of 16 HCs (approximately 19 observations per HC), from 20 December 2022 and to 09 March 2023. The selection of HCs was guided by the retrospective analysis, ensuring that the 10 HCs chosen were those showing the most critical results. The observing study clinician obtained oral consent from the HWs and was instructed not to interfere with the consultation to avoid introducing any additional bias to the observer effect. To ensure a standardized and consistent evaluation, a digital evaluation form (Google sheets) was used. These observations were conducted over 3 days per HC, with efforts made to separate them by a few days in order to have more chance to observe several different HWs and minimize potential bias. At the end of each day of observation in a HC (and not after each consultation to avoid any influence on subsequent consultations), the observing study clinician conducted an interview with the HW to understand why the assessment of some signs was skipped.Data were exported to Microsoft Excel (Version 16.77.1) for further simple descriptive analysis.

Sampling deviation

Second dataset: Most of the time, there was only one HW attending to children in the HC on a given day. On the rare occasions when two HW were present, each was observed by one of the two study clinicians.

Mode of data collection

Other [oth]

Research instrument

The second dataset for this study was derived from structured observations of 188 routine pediatric consultations conducted across a subset of 10 health facilities. Clinicians utilized a standardized evaluation form that included variables aligning with those in the first dataset. This secondary dataset was designed to provide deeper insights into patterns observed in the primary dataset through the quantitative analysis.

  The data collection focused on various clinical measurements and observations, categorized as follows: 
  General Information: 
  • Date of the consultation. 
  • Health facility (coded for anonymity). 
  • Clinical measurements taken at the reception and during the consultation. 
  • Presence of a conducting line. Additional remarks related to the consultation. 

  Clinical Measurements: For each of the following, the dataset records whether the measurement was assessed or skipped, the quality of assessment (sufficient/insufficient), reasons for skipping or insufficient assessments, and any extra remarks: 
  • Temperature (T°). 
  • MUAC (Mid-Upper Arm Circumference). 
  • Weight. Height. 
  • Respiratory Rate (RR). 
  • Blood Oxygen Saturation (Sat). 
  • Heart Rate (HR). 

  Additional Observations: Remarks on other signs and symptoms assessed during the consultation. The structured nature of this dataset ensures consistency in evaluating the reasons behind clinical decisions and the quality of care provided in routine pediatric consultations.

Cleaning operations

Data editing was conducted as follows: First data set: • Data Extraction: The dataset was extracted from the larger ePOCT+ storage system, which records all consultation-related information entered by healthcare workers (HWs) in tablets during consultations. This includes details such as the date of consultation, anthropometric measures, vital signs, the presence or absence of specific symptoms and signs prompted by the algorithm, diagnoses, medicines, and managements.

  • Data Cleaning: 
  The extracted data were systematically cleaned to focus solely on the variables of interest for this analysis. Irrelevant variables and incomplete records were excluded to ensure a streamlined and accurate dataset. 

  • Anonymization: 
  To protect patient and health facilities confidentiality, the data were anonymized prior to analysis. All personal identifiers were removed, and only aggregated or coded information was retained. 

  • Analysis Preparation: 
  After cleaning and anonymization, the dataset was reviewed for consistency and coherence. Specific patterns of data were analyzed for the selected variables of interest, ensuring alignment with the study objectives. 

  • Software Used: Data cleaning, management, and analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.2.1). All processes, including extraction, cleaning, and anonymization, were documented to maintain transparency and reproducibility. 

  **Second dataset:** 
  • Data Collection: Data were collected directly from respondents through a Google Forms questionnaire. The structured format ensured standardized responses across all participants, facilitating subsequent data processing and analysis. 

  • Data Export: 
  Upon completion of data collection, the dataset was exported from Google Forms to Microsoft Excel (Version 16.77.1). This provided a structured and organized format for further data handling. 

  • Anonymization: 
  All personally identifiable information was removed during the data processing phase to protect participant confidentiality. Anonymization measures included replacing personal identifiers with unique codes and omitting any information that could reveal the identity of respondents. 

  • Data Cleaning and Descriptive Analysis: 
  The dataset was reviewed in Microsoft Excel to ensure consistency and completeness. Responses were screened for missing or inconsistent data, and necessary corrections were made where appropriate. Simple descriptive analyses were conducted within Excel to summarize key variables and identify initial patterns in the data.

CompanyData.com, powered by BoldData, provides verified B2B company information sourced directly from official trade registers and government records. Our Switzerland database includes 1,301,033 verified company records, offering detailed insights into one of the world’s most stable and sophisticated business environments.

Each company profile contains rich firmographic data, including company name, legal form, registration number (UID), sector classification (NOGA codes), founding year, company size, and revenue estimates. Many records are enhanced with contact information such as email addresses, direct phone numbers, mobile numbers, and names of key decision-makers.

Our Swiss company data is ideal for a range of applications, including KYC and AML compliance, risk assessment, B2B marketing, lead generation, CRM enrichment, and AI model training. Whether you're engaging with multinationals in Zurich, financial institutions in Geneva, or local SMEs across the country, our data provides the accuracy and depth needed to support smart, data-driven decisions.

We offer flexible delivery options tailored to your business needs — from custom-built company lists and full database exports in Excel or CSV, to seamless real-time API access and a self-service platform for instant data downloads. Additionally, our data enrichment and cleansing services can enhance your internal datasets with fresh, verified information from Switzerland.

With access to over 1,301,033 verified company records worldwide, CompanyData.com gives you the tools to scale confidently — whether you're focused on the Swiss market or expanding internationally. Trust our data to fuel compliance, accelerate growth, and support your strategic goals.

This Kaggle dataset comes from an output dataset that powers my March Madness Data Analysis dashboard in Domo. - Click here to view this dashboard: Dashboard Link - Click here to view this dashboard features in a Domo blog post: Hoops, Data, and Madness: Unveiling the Ultimate NCAA Dashboard

This dataset offers one the most robust resource you will find to discover key insights through data science and data analytics using historical NCAA Division 1 men's basketball data. This data, sourced from KenPom, goes as far back as 2002 and is updated with the latest 2025 data. This dataset is meticulously structured to provide every piece of information that I could pull from this site as an open-source tool for analysis for March Madness.

Key features of the dataset include: - Historical Data: Provides all historical KenPom data from 2002 to 2025 from the Efficiency, Four Factors (Offense & Defense), Point Distribution, Height/Experience, and Misc. Team Stats endpoints from KenPom's website. Please note that the Height/Experience data only goes as far back as 2007, but every other source contains data from 2002 onward. - Data Granularity: This dataset features an individual line item for every NCAA Division 1 men's basketball team in every season that contains every KenPom metric that you can possibly think of. This dataset has the ability to serve as a single source of truth for your March Madness analysis and provide you with the granularity necessary to perform any type of analysis you can think of. - 2025 Tournament Insights: Contains all seed and region information for the 2025 NCAA March Madness tournament. Please note that I will continually update this dataset with the seed and region information for previous tournaments as I continue to work on this dataset.

These datasets were created by downloading the raw CSV files for each season for the various sections on KenPom's website (Efficiency, Offense, Defense, Point Distribution, Summary, Miscellaneous Team Stats, and Height). All of these raw files were uploaded to Domo and imported into a dataflow using Domo's Magic ETL. In these dataflows, all of the column headers for each of the previous seasons are standardized to the current 2025 naming structure so all of the historical data can be viewed under the exact same field names. All of these cleaned datasets are then appended together, and some additional clean up takes place before ultimately creating the intermediate (INT) datasets that are uploaded to this Kaggle dataset. Once all of the INT datasets were created, I joined all of the tables together on the team name and season so all of these different metrics can be viewed under one single view. From there, I joined an NCAAM Conference & ESPN Team Name Mapping table to add a conference field in its full length and respective acronyms they are known by as well as the team name that ESPN currently uses. Please note that this reference table is an aggregated view of all of the different conferences a team has been a part of since 2002 and the different team names that KenPom has used historically, so this mapping table is necessary to map all of the teams properly and differentiate the historical conferences from their current conferences. From there, I join a reference table that includes all of the current NCAAM coaches and their active coaching lengths because the active current coaching length typically correlates to a team's success in the March Madness tournament. I also join another reference table to include the historical post-season tournament teams in the March Madness, NIT, CBI, and CIT tournaments, and I join another reference table to differentiate the teams who were ranked in the top 12 in the AP Top 25 during week 6 of the respective NCAA season. After some additional data clean-up, all of this cleaned data exports into the "DEV _ March Madness" file that contains the consolidated view of all of this data.

This dataset provides users with the flexibility to export data for further analysis in platforms such as Domo, Power BI, Tableau, Excel, and more. This dataset is designed for users who wish to conduct their own analysis, develop predictive models, or simply gain a deeper understanding of the intricacies that result in the excitement that Division 1 men's college basketball provides every year in March. Whether you are using this dataset for academic research, personal interest, or professional interest, I hope this dataset serves as a foundational tool for exploring the vast landscape of college basketball's most riveting and anticipated event of its season.

Abstract

The General Household Survey-Panel (GHS-Panel) is implemented in collaboration with the World Bank Living Standards Measurement Study (LSMS) team as part of the Integrated Surveys on Agriculture (ISA) program. The objectives of the GHS-Panel include the development of an innovative model for collecting agricultural data, interinstitutional collaboration, and comprehensive analysis of welfare indicators and socio-economic characteristics. The GHS-Panel is a nationally representative survey of approximately 5,000 households, which are also representative of the six geopolitical zones. The 2023/24 GHS-Panel is the fifth round of the survey with prior rounds conducted in 2010/11, 2012/13, 2015/16 and 2018/19. The GHS-Panel households were visited twice: during post-planting period (July - September 2023) and during post-harvest period (January - March 2024).

Geographic coverage

National

Analysis unit

• Households • Individuals • Agricultural plots • Communities

Universe

The survey covered all de jure households excluding prisons, hospitals, military barracks, and school dormitories.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The original GHS‑Panel sample was fully integrated with the 2010 GHS sample. The GHS sample consisted of 60 Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) or Enumeration Areas (EAs), chosen from each of the 37 states in Nigeria. This resulted in a total of 2,220 EAs nationally. Each EA contributed 10 households to the GHS sample, resulting in a sample size of 22,200 households. Out of these 22,200 households, 5,000 households from 500 EAs were selected for the panel component, and 4,916 households completed their interviews in the first wave.

After nearly a decade of visiting the same households, a partial refresh of the GHS‑Panel sample was implemented in Wave 4 and maintained for Wave 5. The refresh was conducted to maintain the integrity and representativeness of the sample. The refresh EAs were selected from the same sampling frame as the original GHS‑Panel sample in 2010. A listing of households was conducted in the 360 EAs, and 10 households were randomly selected in each EA, resulting in a total refresh sample of approximately 3,600 households.

In addition to these 3,600 refresh households, a subsample of the original 5,000 GHS‑Panel households from 2010 were selected to be included in the new sample. This “long panel” sample of 1,590 households was designed to be nationally representative to enable continued longitudinal analysis for the sample going back to 2010. The long panel sample consisted of 159 EAs systematically selected across Nigeria’s six geopolitical zones.

The combined sample of refresh and long panel EAs in Wave 5 that were eligible for inclusion consisted of 518 EAs based on the EAs selected in Wave 4. The combined sample generally maintains both the national and zonal representativeness of the original GHS‑Panel sample.

Sampling deviation

Although 518 EAs were identified for the post-planting visit, conflict events prevented interviewers from visiting eight EAs in the North West zone of the country. The EAs were located in the states of Zamfara, Katsina, Kebbi and Sokoto. Therefore, the final number of EAs visited both post-planting and post-harvest comprised 157 long panel EAs and 354 refresh EAs. The combined sample is also roughly equally distributed across the six geopolitical zones.

Mode of data collection

Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

Research instrument

The GHS-Panel Wave 5 consisted of three questionnaires for each of the two visits. The Household Questionnaire was administered to all households in the sample. The Agriculture Questionnaire was administered to all households engaged in agricultural activities such as crop farming, livestock rearing, and other agricultural and related activities. The Community Questionnaire was administered to the community to collect information on the socio-economic indicators of the enumeration areas where the sample households reside.

GHS-Panel Household Questionnaire: The Household Questionnaire provided information on demographics; education; health; labour; childcare; early child development; food and non-food expenditure; household nonfarm enterprises; food security and shocks; safety nets; housing conditions; assets; information and communication technology; economic shocks; and other sources of household income. Household location was geo-referenced in order to be able to later link the GHS-Panel data to other available geographic data sets (forthcoming).

GHS-Panel Agriculture Questionnaire: The Agriculture Questionnaire solicited information on land ownership and use; farm labour; inputs use; GPS land area measurement and coordinates of household plots; agricultural capital; irrigation; crop harvest and utilization; animal holdings and costs; household fishing activities; and digital farming information. Some information is collected at the crop level to allow for detailed analysis for individual crops.

GHS-Panel Community Questionnaire: The Community Questionnaire solicited information on access to infrastructure and transportation; community organizations; resource management; changes in the community; key events; community needs, actions, and achievements; social norms; and local retail price information.

The Household Questionnaire was slightly different for the two visits. Some information was collected only in the post-planting visit, some only in the post-harvest visit, and some in both visits.

The Agriculture Questionnaire collected different information during each visit, but for the same plots and crops.

The Community Questionnaire collected prices during both visits, and different community level information during the two visits.

Cleaning operations

CAPI: Wave five exercise was conducted using Computer Assisted Person Interview (CAPI) techniques. All the questionnaires (household, agriculture, and community questionnaires) were implemented in both the post-planting and post-harvest visits of Wave 5 using the CAPI software, Survey Solutions. The Survey Solutions software was developed and maintained by the Living Standards Measurement Unit within the Development Economics Data Group (DECDG) at the World Bank. Each enumerator was given a tablet which they used to conduct the interviews. Overall, implementation of survey using Survey Solutions CAPI was highly successful, as it allowed for timely availability of the data from completed interviews.

DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEM: The data communication system used in Wave 5 was highly automated. Each field team was given a mobile modem which allowed for internet connectivity and daily synchronization of their tablets. This ensured that head office in Abuja had access to the data in real-time. Once the interview was completed and uploaded to the server, the data was first reviewed by the Data Editors. The data was also downloaded from the server, and Stata dofile was run on the downloaded data to check for additional errors that were not captured by the Survey Solutions application. An excel error file was generated following the running of the Stata dofile on the raw dataset. Information contained in the excel error files were then communicated back to respective field interviewers for their action. This monitoring activity was done on a daily basis throughout the duration of the survey, both in the post-planting and post-harvest.

DATA CLEANING: The data cleaning process was done in three main stages. The first stage was to ensure proper quality control during the fieldwork. This was achieved in part by incorporating validation and consistency checks into the Survey Solutions application used for the data collection and designed to highlight many of the errors that occurred during the fieldwork.

The second stage cleaning involved the use of Data Editors and Data Assistants (Headquarters in Survey Solutions). As indicated above, once the interview is completed and uploaded to the server, the Data Editors review completed interview for inconsistencies and extreme values. Depending on the outcome, they can either approve or reject the case. If rejected, the case goes back to the respective interviewer’s tablet upon synchronization. Special care was taken to see that the households included in the data matched with the selected sample and where there were differences, these were properly assessed and documented. The agriculture data were also checked to ensure that the plots identified in the main sections merged with the plot information identified in the other sections. Additional errors observed were compiled into error reports that were regularly sent to the teams. These errors were then corrected based on re-visits to the household on the instruction of the supervisor. The data that had gone through this first stage of cleaning was then approved by the Data Editor. After the Data Editor’s approval of the interview on Survey Solutions server, the Headquarters also reviews and depending on the outcome, can either reject or approve.

The third stage of cleaning involved a comprehensive review of the final raw data following the first and second stage cleaning. Every variable was examined individually for (1) consistency with other sections and variables, (2) out of range responses, and (3) outliers. However, special care was taken to avoid making strong assumptions when resolving potential errors. Some minor errors remain in the data where the diagnosis and/or solution were unclear to the data cleaning team.

Response