The production price index (PPI) for construction materials and components in the United States decreased slightly in 2024. Up until 2020, construction prices had been rising fairly steadily. However, in the years after that construction producer prices have been very unstable. Production price index A PPI of 342 in 2022, indicates that the real-world price has risen by 242 percent in comparison to the base year - 1982 in this case. Similarly, under the same baseline, the PPI for construction machinery and equipment has also risen steadily until 2018. Like all prices, there are regional differences within the United States. The PPI acts as a measurement for the average changes in prices that domestic producers receive for their output. In the United States, the PPI is one of the oldest continuous statistical datasets published by the government. Common construction materials Some building materials are essential to construction work, and the decision on which to use is important for the life and the endurance of the building. Materials such as cement, steel, and sand are essential to many construction projects. The production of cement is tightly linked to the demand that comes from the construction industry. The durability and potency of steel gives it an advantage over wood and concrete, providing buildings with a higher resistance but a cheaper price tag. Sand is commonly used in buildings, but it is especially common in roads that require stones of various grades and granulation.

Imports - Selected Building Materials (Census Basis) in the United States increased to 4047.99 USD Million in February from 3709.79 USD Million in January of 2024. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for the United States Imports of Selected Building Materials.

Graph and download economic data for Output of Construction Materials for Domestic Consumption Including Net Imports Value in Current Prices for United States (A0232AUSA273NNBR) from 1919 to 1939 about output, materials, imports, Net, domestic, consumption, construction, and USA.

Graph and download economic data for Advance Retail Sales: Building Materials, Garden Equipment and Supplies Dealers (RSBMGESD) from Jan 1992 to Feb 2025 about garden, dealers, materials, supplies, buildings, equipment, retail trade, sales, retail, and USA.

In 2022, building material and supplies dealer sales in the United States reached almost 446 billion U.S. dollars, about 40 billion dollars more than a year earlier. Since 2010, sales of building material and supplies dealers in the U.S. have shown an overall upward trend.

Well construction data for 11,917 domestic and 2,390 public-supply wells in the Central Valley were compiled as part of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Water Quality Assessment Project (NAWQA) and California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Program Priority Basin Project (GAMA-PBP). Data were compiled for wells reported in the USGS National Water Information System (NWIS) database and from well information reported to the SWRCB Department of Drinking Water (SWRCB-DDW). Driller’s log data were transcribed from scanned images of well completion reports filed with California Department of Water Resources (DWR). The wells reported in this data release were filtered by water use to select domestic and public-supply wells and omit other water uses. The compilation was then assumed to be representative of the total population of domestic and public-supply wells in the Central Valley. The wells in the compilation were constructed between 1911 and 2008 but are not grouped or separated by date. The data were used to produce two point data sets containing well location and construction information (depth from land surface to the top and bottom of the well screen, hereafter well-screen tops and bottoms; and screen length), and 12 interpolated GIS raster surfaces created by using Empirical Bayesian Kriging on a 1600 by 1600 meter (1 square-mile) grid. The tables are also included in csv format. The 12 rasters comprise predicted values for well screen tops and bottoms and their 10th and 90th quantile values. The interpolated surfaces may also be used to calculate volumes of water-supply in the Central Valley defined by the well-screen tops and bottoms.

TO4 Task 3.1 - K Hovnanian Chicago, IL DOE Challenge Home Program Certified Home Constructed and Verified Specifications DOE Challenge Home Building envelope Ceiling R-49 blown fiberglass, Grade I Walls 2x4 framing @ 16 o.c. with R-13 fiberglass batts, Grade I and 1"" R-5 extruded polystyrene (XPS) insulating sheathing Frame Floors R-38 blown fiberglass, Grade I Basement Walls R-19 fiberglass batts draped full height, Grade I Basement Slab uninsulated Windows Above Grade: ENERGY STAR certified, U=0.29, SHGC=0.28 Basement: Non ENERGY STAR certified, U=0.29, SHGC=0.24 Infiltration 2 ACH 50 Mechanical systems Heat 95% AFUE sealed combustion natural gas furnace in conditioned space Goodman GMH950703BXAF Cooling 13 SEER split system Goodman GSX130301BC DHW AO Smith Vertex 100 0.96 EF natural gas tank water heater in 2nd floor utility closet Hot Water Distribution Redesigned trunk and branch Compliant with EPA WaterSense Efficient Distribution Requirements Ducts Located 100% in conditioned space via floor joists leak free to outside (5% or less) Ventilation Central Fan Integrated Supply (CFIS) ventilation with 6"" insulated outside air duct Fan Controller: Air Cycler FRV, with 6"" motorized damper 50 CFM outside air flow, 33% duty cycle (10 minutes on, 20 minutes off); ASHRAE 62.2-2010 compliance via an exhaust fan - Panasonic FV-08VQ5 WhisperCeiling Rerturn Pathways Active Return at Master Bedroom Transfer Grilles in Secondary Bedrooms Appliances, Lighting, MELs Lights 80% ENERGY STAR certified CFL Appliances ENERGY STAR certified refrigerator, dishwasher, and clothes washer; Natural gas range/oven and clothes dryer" STRUCTURE - Test House Lot 145 - 2013 DOE Challenge Test House Task 3.1 Bolingbrook, IL 60490 House is constructed and is DOE Challenge Verified by Don Nelson, a local rater. The purpose of this project was to evaluate integrated packages of advanced measures in individual test homes to assess their performance with respect to Building America Program goals, specifically compliance with the DOE Challenge Home Program. To that end, Building Science Corporation (BSC) consulted on the construction of five test houses by three cold climate production builders in three separate U.S. cities. (1) K. Hovnanian Homes, Chicago, Illinois (2) David Weekley Homes, Denver, Colorado (3) Transformations, Inc., Devens, Massachusetts. Overall, the builders have concluded that the energy related upgrades (either through the prescriptive or performance path) represent reasonable upgrades. The builders commented that while not every improvement in specification was cost effective (as in a reasonable payback period), many were improvements that could improve the marketability of the homes and serve to attract more energy efficiency discerning prospective homeowners. However, the builders did express reservations about the associated checklists and added certifications. An increase in administrative time was observed with all builders. The checklists and certifications also inherently increase cost due to: (1) Adding services to the scope of work for various trades, such as HERS Rater and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning contractor. (2) Increased material costs related to the checklists, especially the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Indoor airPLUS and WaterSense Efficient Hot Water Distribution requirement. Ceiling - 18" cellulose Walls - 12" open cell spray foam in double stud walls Foundation - R-10 under slab, 3 1/2" closed-cell spray foam at walls Windows - Harvey U=0.20, SHGC=0.22 Infiltration - 1.0 sq in per 100 sq ft Heating - Mini split heat pump, 10.6 HSPF, 23 SEER Cooling - Mini split heat pump, 10.6 HSPF, 23 SEER DHW - 0.97 EF instantaneous propane water heater Ventilation - bathroom exhaust fans as basic option, HRV upgrade option Adams Circle Devens MA 01434 Cavite Street Devens, MA 01434

Snapshot img

Advanced Building Materials Market Size 2025-2029

The advanced building materials market size is forecast to increase by USD 16.21 billion at a CAGR of 4.7% between 2024 and 2029.

Advanced building materials continue to gain traction in the construction industry due to several key trends. The rise in the number of smart cities is driving the demand for advanced building materials such as smart glass, solar panels, and digital technologies for energy efficiency and sustainability. Additionally, there is a growing preference for eco-friendly and recycled materials, including insulation, sealants, and greenhouse gases-absorbing concrete. Uncertain macroeconomic conditions have also led to an increased focus on cost-effective and durable construction materials such as Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs), ready-mix concrete, and steel. Furthermore, the trend towards green buildings and energy-efficient residential real estate is expected to continue, with a focus on reducing carbon footprints and improving indoor air quality. Boron-based materials, such as boron nitride nanotubes, are also gaining attention for their potential to enhance the properties of cement and roofing materials. Overall, the market in the US is poised for significant growth, driven by these trends and the need for sustainable, cost-effective, and energy-efficient solutions.

What will be the Size of the Advanced Building Materials Market During the Forecast Period?

Request Free Sample

The market encompasses a broad range of innovative and high-performance materials that are transforming the construction industry. These materials, which include cross-laminated timber, structural insulated panels, sealants, ready-mix concrete, precast products and elements, Ondura, advanced cement, and various green materials, are driving the sector's growth through their ability to reduce construction time, enhance energy efficiency, and offer cost-effective solutions. The market's size is significant, with continued expansion expected due to the global focus on decarbonization and the circular economy. Key trends include the increasing adoption of green materials, such as those derived from renewable sources, and the integration of smart technologies into building materials.
Traditional construction materials, such as cement and concrete, are also undergoing advancements to improve their sustainability and performance. Energy-efficient buildings and infrastructure are major applications for these advanced materials, with high-performance windows, insulation materials, and smart glass playing crucial roles. Companies are at the forefront of this innovation, developing and implementing new materials and technologies to meet the evolving needs of the construction industry.

How is this Advanced Building Materials Industry segmented and which is the largest segment?

The advanced building materials industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

Type

  ACC
  Cross-laminated timber
  Sealants
  Structural insulated panel
  Others


End-user

  Commercial
  Industrial
  Residential


Product Type

  Green materials
  Composite materials
  Smart materials
  Nanomaterials


Geography

  APAC

    China
    India
    Japan


  Europe

    Germany
    UK
    France
    Italy


  North America

    Canada
    US


  Middle East and Africa



  South America

    Brazil

By Type Insights

The ACC segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

The advanced cement and concrete market is experiencing significant innovations, transforming the construction industry with materials offering superior durability, strength, and environmental benefits. Technologies such as photocatalytic cement, self-healing concrete, and high-performance additives are gaining popularity. Governments and organizations worldwide support the adoption of modern cement and concrete to reduce carbon emissions and enhance infrastructure durability. Notable advancements include Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC), which provides exceptional strength and longevity, reducing the need for bulky reinforcements and lowering maintenance costs. Cross-laminated timber, structural insulated panels, insulated concrete forms, energy-efficient windows, engineered lumber, and other green materials are also revolutionizing the building construction sector.

Companies are at the forefront of these innovations, focusing on sustainable construction practices and decarbonization. Infrastructure projects and urbanization in sectors such as residential, commercial, and infrastructure benefit from these high-performance materials, which offer energy efficiency, soundproofing, moisture resistance, and resi

Graph and download economic data for Monthly State Retail Sales: Building Material and Garden Equipment and Supplies Dealers in the United States (MSRSUSA444) from Jan 2019 to Nov 2024 about garden, dealers, materials, supplies, buildings, equipment, retail trade, sales, retail, and USA.

Snapshot img

US Commercial Construction Market Size 2025-2029

The us commercial construction market size is forecast to increase by USD 191 billion billion at a CAGR of 2.7% between 2024 and 2029.

The Commercial Construction Market in the US is experiencing significant growth driven by the increasing trend towards sustainable building practices and the emergence of smart cities. Green buildings, which incorporate energy-efficient designs and renewable energy sources, are gaining popularity due to their environmental benefits and cost savings over the long term. This trend is expected to continue as more businesses prioritize sustainability and energy efficiency in their operations. However, the market also faces challenges, most notably the lack of skilled labor in the construction industry. The industry's aging workforce and a decline in new entrants have created a labor shortage, leading to delays and increased costs for construction projects. To mitigate this challenge, companies are exploring innovative solutions such as modular construction and automation technologies to streamline processes and reduce reliance on manual labor. In , the US Commercial Construction Market presents significant opportunities for growth, particularly in the area of sustainable building practices and smart city development. However, companies must also address the challenge of the labor shortage by adopting new technologies and innovative construction methods to remain competitive and deliver projects on time and on budget. By staying informed of these trends and challenges, businesses can effectively capitalize on market opportunities and navigate challenges in the ever-evolving construction landscape.

What will be the size of the US Commercial Construction Market during the forecast period?

Request Free Sample

The commercial construction market in the US continues to exhibit activity, driven by the demand for new office buildings, retail spaces, outdoor leisure facilities, and mixed-use developments. Urbanization and infrastructure development programs are significant growth areas, fueling the need for renovation and retrofitting of existing structures, as well as urban regeneration projects. Energy-saving designs and water infrastructure are key trends, with a focus on reducing costs through efficient building materials and product lead times. The non-residential building market is experiencing cost escalation due to fluctuating material prices, particularly for building materials like lumber, and labor shortages, exacerbated by a shrinking labor force. Despite these challenges, investments in commercial construction remain strong, reflecting the market's ongoing importance to the US economy.

How is this market segmented?

The market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments. SectorPrivate constructionPublic constructionTypeBuildingOthersEnd-userOffice buildingsRetail spacesHotels and hospitalityHealthcare facilitiesOthersGeographyUS

By Sector Insights

The private construction segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

The US commercial construction market encompasses the development of various structures, including office buildings, retail establishments, outdoor leisure facilities, and urban infrastructure projects. Notable initiatives in this sector include the construction of the El Paso VA Health Care Center in Fort Bliss, celebrated in August 2024, and the Skymark Reston Town Center, the tallest residential tower in the Capital Region, topped out in October 2023. These projects contribute to the expansion of the market, with a focus on mixed-use developments, infrastructure building, and energy-saving designs. However, challenges such as cost escalation due to fluctuating material prices, labor shortages, and infrastructure development programs require careful planning and management. Key areas of investment include public transportation, broadband internet, electric grid reconstruction, water infrastructure, and multifamily housing. Operational efficiency, service delivery, and safety are essential functional areas in the non-residential building market. Technological advancements in communication linkages, data and communication, and EV units are transforming the industry.

Get a glance at the market share of various segments Request Free Sample

The Private construction segment was valued at USD 1313.50 billion in 2019 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.

Market Dynamics

Our researchers analyzed the data with 2024 as the base year, along with the key drivers, trends, and challenges. A holistic analysis of drivers will help companies refine their marketing strategies to gain a competitive advant

Snapshot img

US Residential Construction Market Size 2025-2029

The residential construction market size in the US is forecast to increase by USD 242.9 million at a CAGR of 4.5% between 2024 and 2029.

The residential construction market is experiencing significant growth, driven by several key factors. Firstly, the increasing household formation rates in the US continue to fuel demand for new housing units. Secondly, there is a rising focus on sustainability in residential construction projects, with homebuilders increasingly adopting energy-efficient and eco-friendly building materials and practices.
However, the market also faces challenges, including a shortage of skilled labor for large-scale residential real estate projects, which can impact project timelines and budgets. These trends and challenges are shaping the future of the residential construction industry in the US.

What will be the US Residential Construction Market Size During the Forecast Period?

Request Free Sample

The residential construction market is experiencing a significant shift as the affordable housing trend gains momentum. The Federal Reserve's decision to keep the federal funds rate low has contributed to a decrease in mortgage rates, making it an opportune time for home buyers to enter the market. However, the housing supply remains a concern, with construction spending in the residential investment sector showing only modest growth. The labor market's current state is another factor influencing the residential construction industry. With a low unemployment rate, there is a high demand for labor, leading to increased wages and, in turn, higher construction costs.
Inflation also poses a challenge, as it erodes the purchasing power of home buyers and builders alike. The economy's overall health plays a crucial role in the residential construction market's dynamics. A strong economy typically leads to increased demand for new homes, as evidenced by the double-digit growth in housing starts and building permits for single-family homes. However, a recession can lead to a significant decrease in construction activity, as seen in the cancellation rate of housing projects. The Federal Reserve's interest rate decisions, inflation, and the economy's health all impact the residential construction market. Affordable housing programs, such as housing choice vouchers and fair housing programs, play a vital role in ensuring access to housing for a broader population. The construction sectors must navigate these market dynamics to remain competitive and meet the demand for new homes.
The US residential construction market is seeing significant shifts, driven by various housing market trends. Sustainable homebuilding practices are gaining momentum, with a focus on energy-efficient homes and green building materials. Modular construction and prefab housing are becoming increasingly popular for their cost-effective and timely solutions. Urban redevelopment projects are revitalizing city areas, while suburban expansion is fueling demand for new homes. Affordable housing projects are crucial in addressing housing shortages, and real estate investment continues to thrive in these sectors. Smart home integration is also on the rise, with luxury home construction embracing high-tech features. The impact of mortgage rates, coupled with multifamily housing growth and home renovation demand, adds complexity to the market's dynamics.

How is this market segmented and which is the largest segment?

The market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

Product

  Apartments and condominiums
  Villas
  Other types


Type

  New construction
  Renovation


Application

  Single family
  Multi-family


Geography

  US

By Product Insights

The apartments and condominiums segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

The residential construction market in the US is experiencing growth in the apartment and condominium sectors, driven by shifting preferences and lifestyle choices. Urbanization is a significant factor fueling this trend, as more individuals opt for the conveniences and amenities offered in urban areas. As a result, developers are constructing modern, sustainable, and community-focused living spaces in the form of high-rise apartment buildings and condominium complexes. These structures cater to various demographics, including intergenerational groups and younger generations, reflecting diverse living circumstances. The labor economy and vaccination rates have also contributed to the continued activity in the residential sector, allowing for steady progress in construction projects. While the non-residential sector has faced challenges, the residential sector remains a vi

Dynamics of societal material stocks such as buildings and infrastructures and their spatial patterns drive surging resource use and emissions. Building up and maintaining stocks requires large amounts of resources; currently stock-building materials amount to almost 60% of all materials used by humanity. Buildings, infrastructures and machinery shape social practices of production and consumption, thereby creating path dependencies for future resource use. They constitute the physical basis of the spatial organization of most socio-economic activities, for example as mobility networks, urbanization and settlement patterns and various other infrastructures. The data presented hereinafter constitute that basis for quantifying material stocks in a country that exhibits one of the highest material stocks in the world, the United States.

Data

This dataset includes the following material intensities:

• material intensity in mass per volume of above-ground building (kg/m³) per building type
• material intensity in mass per area of road (kg/m²) per road type
• material intensity in mass per area of railway track (kg/m²) per railway type
• material intensity in mass per area (kg/m²) per other infrastructure type

Material intensity factors are split into the following 15 material categories: metals (iron/steel, copper, aluminum, all other metals), non-metallic minerals (concrete, bricks, glass, aggregate except for concrete, all other minerals), biomass-based materials (timber, other biomass-based materials), petrochemical-based materials (bitumen, other petrochemical-based materials), insulation, and other materials.

Material intensity factors are available for each of the following 19 aggregated stock type categories:

• Buildings: low-rise residential (RES-LR), mid-rise residential (RES-MR), low/mid-rise residential / commercial mixed use (RCMU), high-rise residential / commercial mixed use (RCMU-HR), residential / commercial mixed use skyscrapers (RCMU-SKY), commercial / industrial (C/I), and mobile homes and light-weight buildings (MLB)
• Roads: motorway, primary roads, secondary roads, tertiary roads, local roads, rural roads
• Rail-based infrastructure: railway, subway, tram
• Other: airport runways, parking lots, other remaining impervious

Since construction standards for residential buildings and gravel roads vary between different climate zones across the conterminous United States, material intensities for low-rise residential buildings (RES-LR), local roads and tracks were further differentiated according to climate zones.

In addition, the following building volume conversion factors required for deriving material intensity factors for buildings are included in the dataset:

• floor-to-floor height per building type
• roof volume factors (m³/m² footprint) per building type
• share of useable area (SUA) in gross floor area per building type

Building volume conversion factors are based on Haberl et al. (2021) and were used in the calculation of the above-ground volume for those case studies where either the floor-to-floor height or information regarding the roof volume were unavailable, or where only the UA, but not the GFA necessary for the calculation of the above-ground volume were specified.

Further information

The dataset complements a scientific article in preparation which will include further information and an in-depth dataset description. For further information, please see the publication below or contact Dominik Wiedenhofer (dominik.wiedenhofer@boku.ac.at).

D. Frantz, F. Schug, D. Wiedenhofer, A. Baumgart, D. Virág, S. Cooper, C. Gomez-Medina, F. Lehmann, T. Udelhoven, S. van der Linden, P. Hostert, H. Haberl. Weighing the US Economy: Map of Built Structures Unveils Patterns in Human-Dominated Landscapes. In prep

Check out this peer-reviewed article detailing the overall approach and novel method:

H. Haberl, D. Wiedenhofer, F. Schug, D. Frantz, D. Virág, C. Plutzar, K. Gruhler, J. Lederer, G. Schiller, T. Fishman, M. Lanau, A. Gattringer, T. Kemper, G. Liu, H. Tanikawa, S. van der Linden, P. Hostert, High-Resolution Maps of Material Stocks in Buildings and Infrastructures in Austria and Germany. Environ Sci Technol. 55, 3368–3379 (2021), doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c05642

Visit our website to learn more about our project MAT_STOCKS - Understanding the Role of Material Stock Patterns for the Transformation to a Sustainable Society.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (MAT_STOCKS, grant agreement No 741950).

U.S. spending on private construction continued to grow in 2024 and was over three times larger than construction spending in the public sector. Texas and California were at the top of the ranking when observing construction spending within the 50 U.S. states. According to a forecast, the value of U.S. construction put in place is expected to keep rising until 2025. Road construction spending: predicted to grow The value of road construction until 2026 was expected to reach the highest recorded values since 2005. However, data suggest that the United States still needs to catch up. When comparing infrastructure spending as share of GDP across various countries worldwide, the average spending of the United States was much lower than that of many other countries. How much have U.S. construction costs changed? Construction costs for housing varied significantly per city, with single-family homes in Honolulu, San Francisco and New York among the most expensive. During the past years, building costs grew in most of the U.S. big cities at a fast pace. Whilst there are many reasons why this occurred – supply and demand, or local zoning rules making it difficult to build – there is one that became especially noticeable in the past years: the prices of many important building materials went up significantly.

United States Months of Supply: New Construction: Single Family Residential data was reported at 2.914 Month in Mar 2023. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.999 Month for Feb 2023. United States Months of Supply: New Construction: Single Family Residential data is updated monthly, averaging 4.689 Month from Jan 2012 (Median) to Mar 2023, with 135 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 8.571 Month in Jan 2012 and a record low of 1.734 Month in Mar 2021. United States Months of Supply: New Construction: Single Family Residential data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Redfin. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.EB008: Months of Supply.

Graph and download economic data for New Privately-Owned Housing Units Completed: Total Units (COMPUTSA) from Jan 1968 to Feb 2025 about new, private, housing, and USA.

This land cover map is a subset of the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) produced by the Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC) Consortium (USGS, EPA, NOAA, and USFS) 1/6/1999. The NLCD was produced in order to provide a consistent, land cover data layer for the conterminous U.S. utilizing early 1990s Landsat Thematic Mapper data. The raster map depicts the land cover of the Oak Ridge Reservation at a 30m spatial resolution. Yang et al. (2001) found the thematic accuracy for the MRLC land cover map for the eastern U.S. to be 59.7% at Anderson Level II thematic detail and 80.5% at Anderson Level I.

The NLCD classification scheme (based on Anderson et al. 1976) is as follows -

Water - All areas of open water or permanent ice/snow cover. 11. Open Water - all areas of open water, generally with less than 25% cover of vegetation/land cover. 12. Perennial Ice/Snow - all areas characterized by year-long surface cover of ice and/or snow.

Developed Areas characterized by a high percentage (30 percent or greater) of constructed materials (e.g. asphalt, concrete, buildings, etc). 21. Low Intensity Residential - Includes areas with a mixture of constructed materials and vegetation. Constructed materials account for 30-80 percent of the cover. Vegetation may account for 20 to 70 percent of the cover. These areas most commonly include single-family housing units. Population densities will be lower than in high intensity residential areas. 22. High Intensity Residential - Includes highly developed areas where people reside in high numbers. Examples include apartment complexes and row houses. Vegetation accounts for less than 20 percent of the cover. Constructed materials account for 80 to100 percent of the cover. 23. Commercial/Industrial/Transportation - Includes infrastructure (e.g. roads, railroads, etc.) and all highly developed areas not classified as High Intensity Residential.

Barren - Areas characterized by bare rock, gravel, sand, silt, clay, or other earthen material, with little or no green vegetation present regardless of its inherent ability to support life. Vegetation, if present, is more widely spaced and scrubby than that in the green vegetated categories; lichen cover may be extensive. 31. Bare Rock/Sand/Clay - Perennially barren areas of bedrock, desert pavement, scarps, talus, slides, volcanic material, glacial debris, beaches, and other accumulations of earthen material. 32. Quarries/Strip Mines/Gravel Pits - Areas of extractive mining activities with significant surface expression. 33. Transitional - Areas of sparse vegetative cover (less than 25 percent of cover) that are dynamically changing from one land cover to another, often because of land use activities. Examples include forest clearcuts, a transition phase between forest and agricultural land, the temporary clearing of vegetation, and changes due to natural causes (e.g. fire, flood, etc.).

Forested Upland - Areas characterized by tree cover (natural or semi-natural woody vegetation, generally greater than 6 meters tall); tree canopy accounts for 25-100 percent of the cover. 41. Deciduous Forest - Areas dominated by trees where 75 percent or more of the tree species shed foliage simultaneously in response to seasonal change. 42. Evergreen Forest - Areas dominated by trees where 75 percent or more of the tree species maintain their leaves all year. Canopy is never without green foliage. 43. Mixed Forest - Areas dominated by trees where neither deciduous nor evergreen species represent more than 75 percent of the cover present.

Shrubland - Areas characterized by natural or semi-natural woody vegetation with aerial stems, generally less than 6 meters tall, with individuals or clumps not touching to interlocking. Both evergreen and deciduous species of true shrubs, young trees, and trees or shrubs that are small or stunted because of environmental conditions are included. 51. Shrubland - Areas dominated by shrubs; shrub canopy accounts for 25-100 percent of the cover. Shrub cover is generally greater than 25 percent when tree cover is less than 25 percent. Shrub cover may be less than 25 percent in cases when the cover of other life forms (e.g. herbaceous or tree) is less than 25 percent and shrubs cover exceeds the cover of the other life forms.

Non-Natural Woody - Areas dominated by non-natural woody vegetation; non-natural woody vegetative canopy accounts for 25-100 percent of the cover. The non-natural woody classification is subject to the availability of sufficient ancillary data to differentiate non-natural woody vegetation from natural woody vegetation. 61. Orchards/Vineyards/Other - Orchards, vineyards, and other areas planted or maintained for the production of fruits, nuts, berries, or ornamentals.

Herbaceous Upland - Upland areas characterized by natural or semi-natural herbaceous vegetation; herbaceous vegetation accounts for 75-100 percent of the cover. 71. Grasslands/Herbaceous - Areas dominated by upland grasses and forbs. In rare cases, herbaceous cover is less than 25 percent, but exceeds the combined cover of the woody species present. These areas are not subject to intensive management, but they are often utilized for grazing.

Planted/Cultivated - Areas characterized by herbaceous vegetation that has been planted or is intensively managed for the production of food, feed, or fiber; or is maintained in developed settings for specific purposes. Herbaceous vegetation accounts for 75-100 percent of the cover. 81. Pasture/Hay - Areas of grasses, legumes, or grass-legume mixtures planted for livestock grazing or the production of seed or hay crops. 82. Row Crops - Areas used for the production of crops, such as corn, soybeans, vegetables, tobacco, and cotton. 83. Small Grains - Areas used for the production of graminoid crops such as wheat, barley, oats, and rice. 84. Fallow - Areas used for the production of crops that do not exhibit visable vegetation as a result of being tilled in a management practice that incorporates prescribed alternation between cropping and tillage. 85. Urban/Recreational Grasses - Vegetation (primarily grasses) planted in developed settings for recreation, erosion control, or aesthetic purposes. Examples include parks, lawns, golf courses, airport grasses, and industrial site grasses.

Wetlands - Areas where the soil or substrate is periodically saturated with or covered with water. 91. Woody Wetlands - Areas where forest or shrubland vegetation accounts for 25-100 percent of the cover and the soil or substrate is periodically saturated with or covered with water. 92. Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands - Areas where perennial herbaceous vegetation accounts for 75-100 percent of the cover and the soil or substrate is periodically saturated with or covered with water.

Citations Anderson, J. F., E. E. Hardy, J. T. Roach, and R. E. Witmer. 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. In: U.S. Geological Survy Professional Paper. 964 (pp.28). Washingont, DC: U.S. Geological Survey.

Yang, L., S. V. Stehman, J. H. Smith, and J. D. Wichham. 2001. Thematic accuracy of MRLC land cover for the eastern United States. Remote Sensing of Environment, 76:418-422.

Snapshot img

Green Building Materials Market Size 2024-2028

The green building materials market size is forecast to increase by USD 363 billion at a CAGR of 15.67% between 2023 and 2028.

The market is experiencing significant growth due to the increasing demand for energy-efficient and sustainable structures. Key trends include the development of zero-energy buildings and advancements in insulation materials, such as wool, spray foam, and cellulose. Wool, for instance, is a natural and renewable insulation option, while spray foam and cellulose offer high R-values for effective insulation. However, the high initial cost of implementing green technologies remains a challenge for market growth. The adoption of green technology in construction materials, such as exterior siding and insulation, is crucial for reducing carbon emissions and promoting sustainability. Polystyrene, a common insulation material, is under scrutiny due to its environmental impact, leading to the exploration of alternative, eco-friendly insulation solutions. Overall, the market is poised for continued growth as the need for energy efficiency and sustainability becomes increasingly important.

What will be the Size of the Green Building Materials Market During the Forecast Period?

Request Free Sample

The market encompasses a wide range of environmentally friendly products utilized in designing and constructing structures. This market is driven by the increasing awareness of environmental impacts and the need for resource-efficient and ecologically responsible solutions in both commercial and residential construction projects. Extraction and manufacturing processes are being replaced with sustainable ones, such as recycling and the use of recycled materials, in the production of green roofing materials, insulation, flooring, and other segments. Green building materials include resource-efficient options like wool insulation, terrazzo, recycled concrete, stucco, stone, rubber-based materials, and ashcrete. These materials offer significant energy savings as energy-saving measures and contribute to the overall sustainability of urban settlements.
The market is experiencing strong growth due to the rising demand for green-certified buildings and the integration of green principles into sustainable development initiatives. The market's size is substantial and continues to expand as more construction manufacturers adopt green practices and innovative eco-friendly products become available.

How is this Green Building Materials Industry segmented and which is the largest segment?

The industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018-2022 for the following segments.

Application

  Insulation
  Roofing
  Interior finishing
  Framing
  Exterior siding and others


End-user

  Residential
  Non-residential


Geography

  Europe

    Germany
    France


  North America

    US


  APAC

    China
    Japan


  Middle East and Africa



  South America

By Application Insights

The insulation segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

Green building materials play a crucial role in insulation, contributing to energy efficiency, comfort, noise reduction, and preventing condensation issues in construction projects. Properly installed eco-friendly insulation offers financial and comfort benefits to homeowners, aligning with various green building rating systems for homes. Common green insulation materials include cellulose, spray foam, rock wool, and fiberglass. The advantages of using these materials for insulation will drive their application, thereby fueling the growth of the market. Energy savings, improved comfort, and environmental sustainability are significant factors propelling market expansion during the forecast period.

Get a glance at the market report of share of various segments Request Free Sample

The Insulation segment was valued at USD 43.70 billion in 2018 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.

Regional Analysis

Europe is estimated to contribute 35% to the growth of the global market during the forecast period.

Technavio's analysts have elaborately explained the regional trends and drivers that shape the market during the forecast period.

For more insights on the market size of various regions, Request Free Sample

The European market holds a significant position in the global green building materials industry, driven by the region's commitment to sustainability and eco-friendly practices. Energy efficiency is a primary focus, with Europe aiming to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. This demand is met through the use of sustainable building materials. Various green building products are available in Euro

Graph and download economic data for Retail Sales: Building Materials and Supplies Dealers (MRTSSM4441USN) from Jan 1992 to Jan 2025 about dealers, materials, supplies, buildings, retail trade, sales, retail, and USA.

This data release includes grids representing the depth and thickness of drinking-water withdrawal zones, polygons of hydrogeologic settings, an inventory of sources of well construction data, and summaries of data comparisons used to assess the depth of groundwater used for drinking-water supplies in the United States. Well construction data sources are documented in Table1_DataSources.xlsx. Data comparisons using the Mann-Whitney test to assess similarity between hydrogeologic settings were used to justify combining data where they were sparse (compare_neighbors_all_domestic.txt and compare_neighbors_all_public.txt). Water-supply-well depth varies geographically by water use and the type of well, which illustrates the need to identify the depth of domestic drinking water withdrawal and depth of public supply drinking water withdrawal zones. Water-supply-well depth also varies by aquifer; therefore median values were calculated for each Principal Aquifer (PA), Secondary Hydrogeologic Region (SHR) between PAs and PA or SHR associated with overlying sediment polygons, where present, including glacial (G), coarse glacial (GC), and stream-valley alluvium (AV) polygons (all termed hydrogeologic settings here). A polygon shape file of hydrogeologic settings is included in this data release (HG_Settings.zip) and includes well counts and median thicknesses and depths for each area. This data release documents an inventory of well construction data sources and thickness and median top and bottom of drinking water depth zones by aquifer for domestic and public supplies. This data release includes equations used for estimating information for wells missing information on the depth to the top/length of the open interval. This data release contains: HG_Settings.zip --Shape file with well counts and median depth and thickness for hydrogeologic setting areas compare_neighbors_all_domestic.txt --results of Mann-Whitney tests to assess domestic-supply well construction data similarity between hydrogeologic settings compare_neighbors_all_public.txt --results of Mann-Whitney tests to assess public-supply well construction data similarity between hydrogeologic settings Depth_of_Drinking_Water_Supplies_Metadata03162021.xml --Metadata NonReferencedDomestic.txt --An inventory of domestic-supply well data that are not published elsewhere NonReferencedPublic.txt --An inventory of public-supply well data that are not published elsewhere Table1_DataSources.xlsx --An inventory of databases, references, state web sites, and individual state contacts for data sources. The logic behind data extraction algorithms is also defined for each data source. A tab delimited text version with the same name is also available. Lithology_OpenIntervalLengthFit.txt --Parameters for equations used for estimating open intervals by lithology, overlying sediment, and well type HydrogeologicSetting_OpenIntervalLengthFit.txt --Parameters for equations used for estimating open intervals by hydrogeologic setting and well type domestic_grids.zip contains: domestic_bottom_dist_to_5.asc --Grid of domestic-supply well open interval bottom depth data density, distance to reach 5 wells with information on the bottom of the open interval domestic_open_dist_to_5.asc --Grid of domestic-supply well open interval length data density, distance to reach 5 wells with information on open interval length domestic_bottom_open.asc --Grid of domestic-supply well depth to the bottom of the open interval domestic_len_open.asc --Grid of domestic-supply well open-interval length domestic_top_open.asc --Grid of domestic-supply well depth to the top of the open interval public_grids.zip contains: public_bottom_dist_to_5.asc --Grid of the public-supply well open interval bottom depth data density, distance to reach 5 wells with information on the bottom of the open interval public_open_dist_to_5.asc --Grid of the public-supply well open interval length data density, distance to reach 5 wells with information on open interval length public_bottom_open.asc --Grid of the public-supply well depth to the bottom of the open interval public_len_open.asc --Grid of the public-supply well open-interval length public_top_open.asc --Grid of the public-supply well depth to the top of the open interval pubdom_difference_grids.zip contains: pubdom_bottom_open_diff.asc --Grid of the differences between the public-supply and domestic-supply well moving median surfaces representing the bottom of the open interval pubdom_len_open_diff.asc --Grid of the differences between the public-supply and domestic-supply well moving median surfaces representing the length of the open interval pubdom_top_open_diff.asc --Grid of the differences between the public-supply and domestic-supply well moving median surfaces representing the top of the open interval

United States Material Resources: Domestic Extraction Used per Capita: Non Metallic Minerals: Construction Minerals data was reported at 8.923 Tonne in 2022. This records an increase from the previous number of 8.741 Tonne for 2021. United States Material Resources: Domestic Extraction Used per Capita: Non Metallic Minerals: Construction Minerals data is updated yearly, averaging 10.612 Tonne from Dec 1990 (Median) to 2022, with 33 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 13.914 Tonne in 2005 and a record low of 7.996 Tonne in 2011. United States Material Resources: Domestic Extraction Used per Capita: Non Metallic Minerals: Construction Minerals data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.OECD.ESG: Environmental: Material Resources by Material Groups: OECD Member: Annual.