These workbooks contain a subset of cost and emissions data from the 2024 Cambium datasets, with levelization calculations to assist users in translating Cambium’s year-over-year values to a representative value for a user-specified project timeline. These workbooks provide modeled data for 18 GEA regions covering the contiguous United States, projected forward through 2050. Mappings of these regions to ZIP codes and counties is given within this workbook in the corresponding tabs. For the full Cambium 2024 data sets, see the Cambium 2024 project on NREL's Scenario Viewer. For more details on input assumptions and methodology see the associated report: Cambium 2024 Scenario Descriptions and Documentation. Users are advised to review section 4 of the report, which discusses limitations and caveats of the data. This data is planned to be updated annually. Information on the latest versions can be found on the NREL energy analysis page on Cambium.

The data in this dataset were collected in the result of the survey of Latvian society (2021) aimed at identifying high-value data set for Latvia, i.e. data sets that, in the view of Latvian society, could create the value for the Latvian economy and society. The survey is created for both individuals and businesses. It being made public both to act as supplementary data for "Towards enrichment of the open government data: a stakeholder-centered determination of High-Value Data sets for Latvia" paper (author: Anastasija Nikiforova, University of Latvia) and in order for other researchers to use these data in their own work.

The survey was distributed among Latvian citizens and organisations. The structure of the survey is available in the supplementary file available (see Survey_HighValueDataSets.odt)

Description of the data in this data set: structure of the survey and pre-defined answers (if any) 1. Have you ever used open (government) data? - {(1) yes, once; (2) yes, there has been a little experience; (3) yes, continuously, (4) no, it wasn’t needed for me; (5) no, have tried but has failed} 2. How would you assess the value of open govenment data that are currently available for your personal use or your business? - 5-point Likert scale, where 1 – any to 5 – very high 3. If you ever used the open (government) data, what was the purpose of using them? - {(1) Have not had to use; (2) to identify the situation for an object or ab event (e.g. Covid-19 current state); (3) data-driven decision-making; (4) for the enrichment of my data, i.e. by supplementing them; (5) for better understanding of decisions of the government; (6) awareness of governments’ actions (increasing transparency); (7) forecasting (e.g. trendings etc.); (8) for developing data-driven solutions that use only the open data; (9) for developing data-driven solutions, using open data as a supplement to existing data; (10) for training and education purposes; (11) for entertainment; (12) other (open-ended question) 4. What category(ies) of “high value datasets” is, in you opinion, able to create added value for society or the economy? {(1)Geospatial data; (2) Earth observation and environment; (3) Meteorological; (4) Statistics; (5) Companies and company ownership; (6) Mobility} 5. To what extent do you think the current data catalogue of Latvia’s Open data portal corresponds to the needs of data users/ consumers? - 10-point Likert scale, where 1 – no data are useful, but 10 – fully correspond, i.e. all potentially valuable datasets are available 6. Which of the current data categories in Latvia’s open data portals, in you opinion, most corresponds to the “high value dataset”? - {(1)Foreign affairs; (2) business econonmy; (3) energy; (4) citizens and society; (5) education and sport; (6) culture; (7) regions and municipalities; (8) justice, internal affairs and security; (9) transports; (10) public administration; (11) health; (12) environment; (13) agriculture, food and forestry; (14) science and technologies} 7. Which of them form your TOP-3? - {(1)Foreign affairs; (2) business econonmy; (3) energy; (4) citizens and society; (5) education and sport; (6) culture; (7) regions and municipalities; (8) justice, internal affairs and security; (9) transports; (10) public administration; (11) health; (12) environment; (13) agriculture, food and forestry; (14) science and technologies} 8. How would you assess the value of the following data categories? 8.1. sensor data - 5-point Likert scale, where 1 – not needed to 5 – highly valuable 8.2. real-time data - 5-point Likert scale, where 1 – not needed to 5 – highly valuable 8.3. geospatial data - 5-point Likert scale, where 1 – not needed to 5 – highly valuable 9. What would be these datasets? I.e. what (sub)topic could these data be associated with? - open-ended question 10. Which of the data sets currently available could be valauble and useful for society and businesses? - open-ended question 11. Which of the data sets currently NOT available in Latvia’s open data portal could, in your opinion, be valauble and useful for society and businesses? - open-ended question 12. How did you define them? - {(1)Subjective opinion; (2) experience with data; (3) filtering out the most popular datasets, i.e. basing the on public opinion; (4) other (open-ended question)} 13. How high could be the value of these data sets value for you or your business? - 5-point Likert scale, where 1 – not valuable, 5 – highly valuable 14. Do you represent any company/ organization (are you working anywhere)? (if “yes”, please, fill out the survey twice, i.e. as an individual user AND a company representative) - {yes; no; I am an individual data user; other (open-ended)} 15. What industry/ sector does your company/ organization belong to? (if you do not work at the moment, please, choose the last option) - {Information and communication services; Financial and ansurance activities; Accommodation and catering services; Education; Real estate operations; Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles; transport and storage; construction; water supply; waste water; waste management and recovery; electricity, gas supple, heating and air conditioning; manufacturing industry; mining and quarrying; agriculture, forestry and fisheries professional, scientific and technical services; operation of administrative and service services; public administration and defence; compulsory social insurance; health and social care; art, entertainment and recreation; activities of households as employers;; CSO/NGO; Iam not a representative of any company 16. To which category does your company/ organization belong to in terms of its size? - {small; medium; large; self-employeed; I am not a representative of any company} 17. What is the age group that you belong to? (if you are an individual user, not a company representative) - {11..15, 16..20, 21..25, 26..30, 31..35, 36..40, 41..45, 46+, “do not want to reveal”} 18. Please, indicate your education or a scientific degree that corresponds most to you? (if you are an individual user, not a company representative) - {master degree; bachelor’s degree; Dr. and/ or PhD; student (bachelor level); student (master level); doctoral candidate; pupil; do not want to reveal these data}

Format of the file .xls, .csv (for the first spreadsheet only), .odt

Licenses or restrictions CC-BY

The data consist of two parts: Time trade-off (TTO) data with one row per TTO question (5 questions), and discrete choice experiment (DCE) data with one row per question (6 questions). The purpose of the data is the calculation of a Swedish value set for the capability-adjusted life years (CALY-SWE) instrument. To protect the privacy of the study participants and to comply with GDPR, access to the data is given upon request.

The data is provided in 4 .csv files with the names:

• tto.csv (252 kB)
• dce.csv (282 kB)
• weights_final_model.csv (30 kB)
• coefs_final_model.csv (1 kB)

The first two files (tto.csv, dce.csv) contain the time trade-off (TTO) answers and discrete choice experiment (DCE) answers of participants. The latter two files (weight_final_model.csv, coefs_final_model.csv) contain the generated value set of CALY-SWE weights, and the pertaining coefficients of the main effects additive model.

Background:

CALY-SWE is a capability-based instrument for studying Quality of Life (QoL). It consists of 6 attributes (health, social relations, financial situation & housing, occupation, security, political & civil rights) and provides the option to gives for attribute answers on 3 levels (Agree, Agree partially, Do not agree). A configuration or state is one of the 3^6 = 729 possible situations that the instrument describes. Here, a config is denoted in the form of xxxxxx, one x for each attribute in order above. X is a digit corresponding to the level of the respective attribute, with 3 being the highest (Agree), and 1 being the lowest (Do not agree). For example, 222222 encodes a configuration with all attributes on level 2 (Partially agree). The purpose of this dataset is to support the publication of the CALY-SWE value set and to enable reproduction of the calculations (due to privacy concerns we abstain from publishing individual level characteristics). A value set consists of values on the 0 to 1 scale for all 729, each of represents a quality weighting where 1 is the highest capability-related QoL, and 0 the lowest capability-related QoL.

The data contains answers to two types of questions: TTO and DCE.

In TTO questions, participants iteratively chose a number of years between 1 to 10. A choice of 10 years is equivalent to living 10 years with full capability (state configuration 333333) in the capability state that the TTO question describes. The answer on the 0 to 1 scale is then calculated as x/10. In the DCE questions, participants were given two states and they chose a state that they found to be better. We used a hybrid model with a linear regression and a logit model component, where the coefficients were linked through a multiplicative factor, to obtain the weights (weights_final_model.csv). Each weight is calculated as constant + the coefficients for the respective configuration. Coefficients for level 3 encode the difference to level 2, and coefficients for level 2 the difference to the constant. For example, for the weight for 123112 is calculated as constant + socrel2 + finhou2 + finhou3 + polciv2 (No coefficients for health, occupation, and security involved as they are on level 1 that is captured in the constant/intercept).

To assess the quality of TTO answers, we calculated a score per participant that takes into account inconsistencies in answering the TTO question. We then excluded 20% of participants with the worst score to improve the TTO data quality and signal strength for the model (this is indicated by the 'included' variable in the TTO dataset). Details of the entire survey are described in the preprint “CALY-SWE value set: An integrated approach for a valuation study based on an online-administered TTO and DCE survey” by Meili et al. (2023). Please check this document for updated versions.

Ids have been randomized with preserved linkage between the DCE and TTO dataset.

Data files and variables:

Below is a description of the variables in each CSV file. - tto.csv:

config: 6 numbers representing the attribute levels. position: The number of the asked TTO question. tto_block: The design block of the TTO question. answer: The equivalence value indicated by the participant, ranging from 0.1 to 1 in steps of 0.1. included: If the answer was included in the data for the model to generate the value set. id: Randomized id of the participant.

• dce.csv:

config1: Configuration of the first state in the question. config2: Configuration of the second state in the question. position: The number of the asked TTO question. answer: Whether state 1 or 2 was preferred. id: Randomized id of the participant.

• weights_final_model.csv

config: 6 numbers representing the attribute levels. weight: The weight calculated with the final model. ciu: The upper 95% credible interval. cil: The lower 95% credible interval.

• coefs_final_model.csv:

name: Name of the coefficient, composed of an abbreviation for the attribute and a level number (abbreviations in the same order as above: health, socrel, finhou, occu, secu, polciv). value: Continuous, weight on the 0 to 1 scale. ciu: The upper 95% credible interval. cil: The lower 95% credible interval.

The documentation below is in reference to this items placement in the NM Supply Chain Data Hub. The documentation is of use to understanding the source of this item, and how to reproduce it for updatesTitle: Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) DownloaderItem Type: Web Mapping Application URLSummary: Download ready-to-use project packages with over 170 attributes derived from the SSURGO (Soil Survey Geographic Database) dataset.Notes: Prepared by: Uploaded by EMcRae_NMCDCSource: https://nmcdc.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=cdc49bd63ea54dd2977f3f2853e07fff link to Esri web mapping applicationFeature Service: https://nmcdc.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=305ef916da574a71877edb15c3f47f08#overviewUID: 26Data Requested: Ag CensusMethod of Acquisition: Esri web mapDate Acquired: 6/16/22Priority rank as Identified in 2022 (scale of 1 being the highest priority, to 11 being the lowest priority): 8Tags: PENDINGDOCUMENTATION FROM DATA SOURCE URL: This application provides quick access to ready-to-use project packages filled with useful soil data derived from the SSURGO dataset.To use this application, navigate to your study area and click the map. A pop-up window will open. Click download and the project package will be copied to your computer. Double click the downloaded package to open it in ArcGIS Pro. Alt + click on the layer in the table of contents to zoom to the subbasin.Soil map units are the basic geographic unit of the Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO). The SSURGO dataset is a compilation of soils information collected over the last century by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Map units delineate the extent of different soils. Data for each map unit contains descriptions of the soil’s components, productivity, unique properties, and suitability interpretations.Each soil type has a unique combination of physical, chemical, nutrient and moisture properties. Soil type has ramifications for engineering and construction activities, natural hazards such as landslides, agricultural productivity, the distribution of native plant and animal life and hydrologic and other physical processes. Soil types in the context of climate and terrain can be used as a general indicator of engineering constraints, agriculture suitability, biological productivity and the natural distribution of plants and animals.Dataset SummaryThe map packages were created from the October 2021 SSURGO snapshot. The dataset covers the 48 contiguous United States plus Hawaii and portions of Alaska. Map packages are available for Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands. A project package for US Island Territories and associated states of the Pacific Ocean can be downloaded by clicking one of the included areas in the map. The Pacific Project Package includes: Guam, the Marshall Islands, the Northern Marianas Islands, Palau, the Federated States of Micronesia, and American Samoa.Not all areas within SSURGO have completed soil surveys and many attributes have areas with no data. The soil data in the packages is also available as a feature layer in the ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World.AttributesKey fields from nine commonly used SSURGO tables were compiled to create the 173 attribute fields in this layer. Some fields were joined directly to the SSURGO Map Unit polygon feature class while others required summarization and other processing to create a 1:1 relationship between the attributes and polygons prior to joining the tables. Attributes of this layer are listed below in their order of occurrence in the attribute table and are organized by the SSURGO table they originated from and the processing methods used on them.Map Unit Polygon Feature Class Attribute TableThe fields in this table are from the attribute table of the Map Unit polygon feature class which provides the geographic extent of the map units.Area SymbolSpatial VersionMap Unit SymbolMap Unit TableThe fields in this table have a 1:1 relationship with the map unit polygons and were joined to the table using the Map Unit Key field.Map Unit NameMap Unit KindFarmland ClassInterpretive FocusIntensity of MappingIowa Corn Suitability RatingLegend TableThis table has 1:1 relationship with the Map Unit table and was joined using the Legend Key field.Project ScaleSurvey Area Catalog TableThe fields in this table have a 1:1 relationship with the polygons and were joined to the Map Unit table using the Survey Area Catalog Key and Legend Key fields.Survey Area VersionTabular VersionMap Unit Aggregated Attribute TableThe fields in this table have a 1:1 relationship with the map unit polygons and were joined to the Map Unit attribute table using the Map Unit Key field.Slope Gradient - Dominant ComponentSlope Gradient - Weighted AverageBedrock Depth - MinimumWater Table Depth - Annual MinimumWater Table Depth - April to June MinimumFlooding Frequency - Dominant ConditionFlooding Frequency - MaximumPonding Frequency - PresenceAvailable Water Storage 0-25 cm - Weighted AverageAvailable Water Storage 0-50 cm - Weighted AverageAvailable Water Storage 0-100 cm - Weighted AverageAvailable Water Storage 0-150 cm - Weighted AverageDrainage Class - Dominant ConditionDrainage Class - WettestHydrologic Group - Dominant ConditionIrrigated Capability Class - Dominant ConditionIrrigated Capability Class - Proportion of Map Unit with Dominant ConditionNon-Irrigated Capability Class - Dominant ConditionNon-Irrigated Capability Class - Proportion of Map Unit with Dominant ConditionRating for Buildings without Basements - Dominant ConditionRating for Buildings with Basements - Dominant ConditionRating for Buildings with Basements - Least LimitingRating for Buildings with Basements - Most LimitingRating for Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Dominant ConditionRating for Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Least LimitingRating for Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Most LimitingRating for Sewage Lagoons - Dominant ConditionRating for Sewage Lagoons - Dominant ComponentRating for Roads and Streets - Dominant ConditionRating for Sand Source - Dominant ConditionRating for Sand Source - Most ProbableRating for Paths and Trails - Dominant ConditionRating for Paths and Trails - Weighted AverageErosion Hazard of Forest Roads and Trails - Dominant ComponentHydric Classification - PresenceRating for Manure and Food Processing Waste - Weighted AverageComponent Table – Dominant ComponentMap units have one or more components. To create a 1:1 join component data must be summarized by map unit. For these fields a custom script was used to select the component with the highest value for the Component Percentage Representative Value field (comppct_r). Ties were broken with the Slope Representative Value field (slope_r). Components with lower average slope were selected as dominant. If both soil order and slope were tied, the first value in the table was selected.Component Percentage - Low ValueComponent Percentage - Representative ValueComponent Percentage - High ValueComponent NameComponent KindOther Criteria Used to Identify ComponentsCriteria Used to Identify Components at the Local LevelRunoff ClassSoil loss tolerance factorWind Erodibility IndexWind Erodibility GroupErosion ClassEarth Cover 1Earth Cover 2Hydric ConditionHydric RatingAspect Range - Counter Clockwise LimitAspect - Representative ValueAspect Range - Clockwise LimitGeomorphic DescriptionNon-Irrigated Capability SubclassNon-Irrigated Unit Capability ClassIrrigated Capability SubclassIrrigated Unit Capability ClassConservation Tree Shrub GroupGrain Wildlife HabitatGrass Wildlife HabitatHerbaceous Wildlife HabitatShrub Wildlife HabitatConifer Wildlife HabitatHardwood Wildlife HabitatWetland Wildlife HabitatShallow Water Wildlife HabitatRangeland Wildlife HabitatOpenland Wildlife HabitatWoodland Wildlife HabitatWetland Wildlife HabitatSoil Slip PotentialSusceptibility to Frost HeavingConcrete CorrosionSteel CorrosionTaxonomic ClassTaxonomic OrderTaxonomic SuborderGreat GroupSubgroupParticle SizeParticle Size ModCation Exchange Activity ClassCarbonate ReactionTemperature ClassMoist SubclassSoil Temperature RegimeEdition of Keys to Soil Taxonomy Used to Classify SoilCalifornia Storie IndexComponent KeyComponent Table – Weighted AverageMap units may have one or more soil components. To create a 1:1 join, data from the Component table must be summarized by map unit. For these fields a custom script was used to calculate an average value for each map unit weighted by the Component Percentage Representative Value field (comppct_r).Slope Gradient - Low ValueSlope Gradient - Representative ValueSlope Gradient - High ValueSlope Length USLE - Low ValueSlope Length USLE - Representative ValueSlope Length USLE - High ValueElevation - Low ValueElevation - Representative ValueElevation - High ValueAlbedo - Low ValueAlbedo - Representative ValueAlbedo - High ValueMean Annual Air Temperature - Low ValueMean Annual Air Temperature - Representative ValueMean Annual Air Temperature - High ValueMean Annual Precipitation - Low ValueMean Annual Precipitation - Representative ValueMean Annual Precipitation - High ValueRelative Effective Annual Precipitation - Low ValueRelative Effective Annual Precipitation - Representative ValueRelative Effective Annual Precipitation - High ValueDays between Last and First Frost - Low ValueDays between Last and First Frost - Representative ValueDays between Last and First Frost - High ValueRange Forage Annual Potential Production - Low ValueRange Forage Annual Potential Production - Representative ValueRange Forage Annual Potential Production - High ValueInitial Subsidence - Low ValueInitial Subsidence - Representative ValueInitial Subsidence - High ValueTotal Subsidence - Low ValueTotal Subsidence - Representative ValueTotal Subsidence - High ValueCrop Productivity IndexEsri SymbologyThis field was created to provide symbology based on the Taxonomic Order field (taxorder). Because some map units have a null value for soil order, a

Techsalerator offers an extensive dataset of End-of-Day Pricing Data for all 177 companies listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (XNSA) in Nigeria. This dataset includes the closing prices of equities (stocks), bonds, and indices at the end of each trading session. End-of-day prices are vital pieces of market data that are widely used by investors, traders, and financial institutions to monitor the performance and value of these assets over time.

Top 5 used data fields in the End-of-Day Pricing Dataset for Nigeria:

1. Equity Closing Price :The closing price of individual company stocks at the end of the trading day.This field provides insights into the final price at which market participants were willing to buy or sell shares of a specific company.

2. Bond Closing Price: The closing price of various fixed-income securities, including government bonds, corporate bonds, and municipal bonds. Bond investors use this field to assess the current market value of their bond holdings.

3. Index Closing Price: The closing value of market indices, such as the Botswana stock market index, at the end of the trading day. These indices track the overall market performance and direction.

4. Equity Ticker Symbol: The unique symbol used to identify individual company stocks. Ticker symbols facilitate efficient trading and data retrieval.

5. Date of Closing Price: The specific trading day for which the closing price is provided. This date is essential for historical analysis and trend monitoring.

‍

Top 5 financial instruments with End-of-Day Pricing Data in Nigeria:

Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) Domestic Company Index: The main index that tracks the performance of domestic companies listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange. This index provides an overview of the overall market performance in Nigeria.

Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) Foreign Company Index: The index that tracks the performance of foreign companies listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange. This index reflects the performance of international companies operating in Nigeria.

Company A: A prominent Nigerian company with diversified operations across various sectors, such as telecommunications, energy, or banking. This company's stock is widely traded on the Nigerian Stock Exchange.

Company B: A leading financial institution in Nigeria, offering banking, insurance, or investment services. This company's stock is actively traded on the Nigerian Stock Exchange.

Company C: A major player in the Nigerian agricultural sector, involved in the production and distribution of agricultural products. This company's stock is listed and actively traded on the Nigerian Stock Exchange.

‍

If you're interested in accessing Techsalerator's End-of-Day Pricing Data for Nigeria, please contact info@techsalerator.com with your specific requirements. Techsalerator will provide you with a customized quote based on the number of data fields and records you need. The dataset can be delivered within 24 hours, and ongoing access options can be discussed if needed.

‍

Data fields included:

Equity Ticker Symbol Equity Closing Price Bond Ticker Symbol Bond Closing Price Index Ticker Symbol Index Closing Price Date of Closing Price Equity Name Equity Volume Equity High Price Equity Low Price Equity Open Price Bond Name Bond Coupon Rate Bond Maturity Index Name Index Change Index Percent Change Exchange Currency Total Market Capitalization Dividend Yield Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E) ‍

Q&A:

1. How much does the End-of-Day Pricing Data cost in Nigeria ?

The cost of this dataset may vary depending on factors such as the number of data fields, the frequency of updates, and the total records count. For precise pricing details, it is recommended to directly consult with a Techsalerator Data specialist.

1. How complete is the End-of-Day Pricing Data coverage in Nigeria?

Techsalerator provides comprehensive coverage of End-of-Day Pricing Data for various financial instruments, including equities, bonds, and indices. Thedataset encompasses major companies and securities traded on Nigeria exchanges.

1. How does Techsalerator collect this data?

Techsalerator collects End-of-Day Pricing Data from reliable sources, including stock exchanges, financial news outlets, and other market data providers. Data is carefully curated to ensure accuracy and reliability.

1. Can I select specific financial instruments or multiple countries with Techsalerator's End-of-Day Pricing Data?

Techsalerator offers the flexibility to select specific financial instruments, such as equities, bonds, or indices, depending on your needs. While the dataset focuses on Botswana, Techsalerator also provides data for other countries and international markets.

1. How do I pay for this dataset?

Techsalerator accepts various payment methods, including credit cards, direct transfers, ACH, and w...

Time series data for the statistic Trade_Balance_Congo,_Rep._of_the_United_States. Indicator Definition:Goods, Value of Trade Balance, US DollarsThe indicator "Goods, Value of Trade Balance, US Dollars" stands at -0.2308 Million as of 3/31/2025, the highest value since 1/31/2024. Regarding the One-Year-Change of the series, the current value constitutes an increase of 11.59 Million compared to the value the year prior.The Serie's long term average value is 26.35 Million. It's latest available value, on 3/31/2025, is -26.58 Million lower, compared to it's long term average value.The Serie's change from it's minimum value, on 5/31/2016, to it's latest available value, on 3/31/2025, is +193.60 Million.The Serie's change from it's maximum value, on 7/31/2011, to it's latest available value, on 3/31/2025, is -307.02 Million.

Post-processed and normalized data sets for specimens S2-0, S2-1, S2-2, S2-4, S2-8 and S2-9, used in Figure 14 of the publication: "Data processing, analysis, and evaluation methods for co-design of coreless filament-wound building systems", in the Journal of Computational Design and Engineering. The data allows the comparison of different geometrical, fabrication and structural parameters per segment of each specimen. The raw data was obtained during the robotic fabrication and mechanical testing of specimens S1, S2 and S3 for the publication "Computational co-design framework for coreless wound fibre-polymer composite structures. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering 9(2), 310-32", and the complete raw data is published in the data set "Object model data sets of the case study specimens for the computational co-design framework for coreless wound fibre-polymer composite structures (V1)". To extend the research, 6 specimens of the series S2 were chosen for further postprocessing. A representative number per segment was calculated for each data set. The fabrication data, which originally is produced per layer wound, is either accumulated or averaged for the total of layers in one segment. While for the geometrical or structural data, the average or maximum number of all bar elements in one segment was chosen. These decisions were taken to find representative values based on the experience of the researchers, and it is described in the data set. Finally, by normalizing all data with respect to the 6 specimens and all segments, the data can be analyzed in the same format, making compatible the comparison of geometrical, structural and fabrication data to find interrelations and possible reasons for the failure of the specimens during the mechanical test.

Time series data for the statistic Trade_Balance_Egypt,_Arab_Rep._of_Montenegro. Indicator Definition:Goods, Value of Trade Balance, US DollarsThe indicator "Goods, Value of Trade Balance, US Dollars" stands at 0.1636 Million as of 3/31/2025. Regarding the One-Year-Change of the series, the current value constitutes an decrease of -0.3541 Million compared to the value the year prior.The Serie's long term average value is 0.0085 Million. It's latest available value, on 3/31/2025, is 0.155 Million higher, compared to it's long term average value.The Serie's change from it's minimum value, on 2/28/2015, to it's latest available value, on 3/31/2025, is +1.15 Million.The Serie's change from it's maximum value, on 8/31/2022, to it's latest available value, on 3/31/2025, is -1.64 Million.

This dataset provides information about the number of properties, residents, and average property values for Representative Drive cross streets in Jeffersonville, KY.

The anthropometric datasets presented here are virtual datasets. The unweighted virtual dataset was generated using a synthesis and subsequent validation algorithm (Ackermann et al., 2023). The underlying original dataset used in the algorithm was collected within a regional epidemiological public health study in northeastern Germany (SHIP, see Völzke et al., 2022). Important details regarding the collection of the anthropometric dataset within SHIP (e.g. sampling strategy, measurement methodology & quality assurance process) are discussed extensively in the study by Bonin et al. (2022). To approximate nationally representative values for the German working-age population, the virtual dataset was weighted with reference data from the first survey wave of the Study on health of adults in Germany (DEGS1, see Scheidt-Nave et al., 2012). Two different algorithms were used for the weighting procedure: (1) iterative proportional fitting (IPF), which is described in more detail in the publication by Bonin et al. (2022), and (2) a nearest neighbor approach (1NN), which is presented in the study by Kumar and Parkinson (2018). Weighting coefficients were calculated for both algorithms and it is left to the practitioner which coefficients are used in practice. Therefore, the weighted virtual dataset has two additional columns containing the calculated weighting coefficients with IPF ("WeightCoef_IPF") or 1NN ("WeightCoef_1NN"). Unfortunately, due to the sparse data basis at the distribution edges of SHIP compared to DEGS1, values underneath the 5th and above the 95th percentile should be considered with caution. In addition, the following characteristics describe the weighted and unweighted virtual datasets: According to ISO 15535, values for "BMI" are in [kg/m2], values for "Body mass" are in [kg], and values for all other measures are in [mm]. Anthropometric measures correspond to measures defined in ISO 7250-1. Offset values were calculated for seven anthropometric measures because there were systematic differences in the measurement methodology between SHIP and ISO 7250-1 regarding the definition of two bony landmarks: the acromion and the olecranon. Since these seven measures rely on one of these bony landmarks, and it was not possible to modify the SHIP methodology regarding landmark definitions, offsets had to be calculated to obtain ISO-compliant values. In the presented datasets, two columns exist for these seven measures. One column contains the measured values with the landmarking definitions from SHIP, and the other column (marked with the suffix "_offs") contains the calculated ISO-compliant values (for more information concerning the offset values see Bonin et al., 2022). The sample size is N = 5000 for the male and female subsets. The original SHIP dataset has a sample size of N = 1152 (women) and N = 1161 (men). Due to this discrepancy between the original SHIP dataset and the virtual datasets, users may get a false sense of comfort when using the virtual data, which should be mentioned at this point. In order to get the best possible representation of the original dataset, a virtual sample size of N = 5000 is advantageous and has been confirmed in pre-tests with varying sample sizes, but it must be kept in mind that the statistical properties of the virtual data are based on an original dataset with a much smaller sample size.

This is a MD iMAP hosted service layer. Find more information at http://imap.maryland.gov. userdata and unzip the LayerFiles.zip folder.Data from the four SSURGO tables were assembled into the single table included in each map package. Data from the component table were aggregated using a dominant component model (listed below under Component Table - Dominant Component) or a weighted average model (listed below under Component Table - Weighted Average) using custom Python scripts. The the Mapunit table - the MUAGATTAT table and the processed Component table data were joined to the Mapunit Feature Class. Field aliases were added and indexes calculated. A field named Map Symbol was created and populated with random integers from 1-10 for symbolizing the soil units in the map package.For documentation of the SSURGO dataset see:http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/SSURGOMetadata.aspxFor documentation of the Watershed Boundary Dataset see: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/water/watersheds/datasetThe map packages contain the following attributes in the Map Units layer:Mapunit Feature Class:Survey AreaSpatial VersionMapunit SymbolMapunit KeyNational Mapunit SymbolMapunit Table:Mapunit NameMapunit KindFarmland ClassHighly Erodible Lands Classification - Wind and WaterHighly Erodible Lands Classification - WaterHighly Erodible Lands Classification - WindInterpretive FocusIntensity of MappingLegend KeyMapunit SequenceIowa Corn Suitability RatingLegend Table:Project ScaleTabular VersionMUAGGATT Table:Slope Gradient - Dominant ComponentSlope Gradient - Weighted AverageBedrock Depth - MinimumWater Table Depth - Annual MinimumWater Table Depth - April to June MinimumFlooding Frequency - Dominant ConditionFlooding Frequency - MaximumPonding Frequency - PresenceAvailable Water Storage 0-25 cm - Weighted AverageAvailable Water Storage 0-50 cm - Weighted AverageAvailable Water Storage 0-100 cm - Weighted AverageAvailable Water Storage 0-150 cm - Weighted AverageDrainage Class - Dominant ConditionDrainage Class - WettestHydrologic Group - Dominant ConditionIrrigated Capability Class - Dominant ConditionIrrigated Capability Class - Proportion of Mapunit with Dominant ConditionNon-Irrigated Capability Class - Dominant ConditionNon-Irrigated Capability Class - Proportion of Mapunit with Dominant ConditionRating for Buildings without Basements - Dominant ConditionRating for Buildings with Basements - Dominant ConditionRating for Buildings with Basements - Least LimitingRating for Buildings with Basements - Most LimitingRating for Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Dominant ConditionRating for Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Least LimitingRating for Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Most LimitingRating for Sewage Lagoons - Dominant ConditionRating for Sewage Lagoons - Dominant ComponentRating for Roads and Streets - Dominant ConditionRating for Sand Source - Dominant ConditionRating for Sand Source - Most ProbableRating for Paths and Trails - Dominant ConditionRating for Paths and Trails - Weighted AverageErosion Hazard of Forest Roads and Trails - Dominant ComponentHydric Classification - PresenceRating for Manure and Food Processing Waste - Weighted AverageComponent Table - Weighted Average:Mean Annual Air Temperature - High Value Mean Annual Air Temperature - Low Value Mean Annual Air Temperature - Representative Value Albedo - High Value Albedo - Low Value Albedo - Representative Value Slope - High Value Slope - Low Value Slope - Representative Value Slope Length - High Value Slope Length - Low Value Slope Length - Representative Value Elevation - High Value Elevation - Low Value Elevation - Representative Value Mean Annual Precipitation - High Value Mean Annual Precipitation - Low Value Mean Annual Precipitation - Representative Value Days between Last and First Frost - High Value Days between Last and First Frost - Low Value Days between Last and First Frost - Representative Value Crop Production Index Range Forage Annual Potential Production - High Value Range Forage Annual Potential Production - Low Value Range Forage Annual Potential Production - Representative Value Initial Subsidence - High Value Initial Subsidence - Low Value Initial Subsidence - Representative Value Total Subsidence - High ValueTotal Subsidence - Low Value Total Subsidence - Representative Value Component Table - Dominant Component:Component KeyComponent Percentage - Low ValueComponent Percentage - Representative ValueComponent Percentage - High ValueComponent NameComponent KindOther Criteria Used to Identify ComponentsCriteria Used to Identify Components at the Local LevelRunoffSoil Loss Tolerance FactorWind Erodibility IndexWind Erodibility GroupErosion ClassEarth Cover 1Earth Cover 2Hydric ConditionAspect Range - Counter Clockwise LimitAspect - Representative ValueAspect Range - Clockwise LimitGeomorphic DescriptionNon-Irrigated Capability SubclassNon-Irrigated Unit Capability ClassIrrigated Capability SubclassIrrigated Unit Capability ClassConservation Tree Shrub GroupForage Suitability GroupGrain Wildlife HabitatGrass Wildlife HabitatHerbaceous Wildlife HabitatShrub Wildlife HabitatConifer Wildlife HabitatHardwood Wildlife HabitatWetland Wildlife HabitatShallow Water Wildlife HabitatRangeland Wildlife HabitatOpenland Wildlife HabitatWoodland Wildlife HabitatWetland Wildlife HabitatSoil Slip PotentialSusceptibility to Frost HeavingConcrete CorrosionSteel CorrosionTaxonomic Class NameOrderSuborderGreat GroupSubgroupParticle SizeParticle Size ModifierCation Exchange Activity ClassCarbonate ReactionTemperature ClassMoisture SubclassSoil Temperature RegimeEdition of Keys to Soil Taxonomy Used to Classify SoilThe U.S. Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service - should be acknowledged as the data source in products derived from these data. This data set is not designed for use as a primary regulatory tool in permitting or citing decisions - but may be used as a reference source. This is public information and may be interpreted by organizations - agencies - units of government - or others based on needs; however - they are responsible for the appropriate application. Federal - State - or local regulatory bodies are not to reassign to the Natural Resources Conservation Service any authority for the decisions that they make. The Natural Resources Conservation Service will not perform any evaluations of these maps for purposes related solely to State or local regulatory programs. Photographic or digital enlargement of these maps to scales greater than at which they were originally mapped can cause misinterpretation of the data. If enlarged - maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The depicted soil boundaries - interpretations - and analysis derived from them do not eliminate the need for onsite sampling - testing - and detailed study of specific sites for intensive uses. Thus - these data and their interpretations are intended for planning purposes only. Digital data files are periodically updated. Files are dated - and users are responsible for obtaining the latest version of the data.The attribute accuracy is tested by manual comparison of the source with hard copy plots and/or symbolized display of the map data on an interactive computer graphic system. Selected attributes that cannot be visually verified on plots or on screen are interactively queried and verified on screen. In addition - the attributes are tested against a master set of valid attributes. All attribute data conform to the attribute codes in the signed classification and correlation document and amendment(s). Last Updated: Feature Service Layer Link: https://mdgeodata.md.gov/imap/rest/services/Geoscientific/MD_SSURGOSoils/MapServer ADDITIONAL LICENSE TERMS: The Spatial Data and the information therein (collectively "the Data") is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind either expressed implied or statutory. The user assumes the entire risk as to quality and performance of the Data. No guarantee of accuracy is granted nor is any responsibility for reliance thereon assumed. In no event shall the State of Maryland be liable for direct indirect incidental consequential or special damages of any kind. The State of Maryland does not accept liability for any damages or misrepresentation caused by inaccuracies in the Data or as a result to changes to the Data nor is there responsibility assumed to maintain the Data in any manner or form. The Data can be freely distributed as long as the metadata entry is not modified or deleted. Any data derived from the Data must acknowledge the State of Maryland in the metadata.

Techsalerator offers an extensive dataset of End-of-Day Pricing Data for all 1003 companies listed on the Euronext Amsterdam (XAMS) in Netherlands. This dataset includes the closing prices of equities (stocks), bonds, and indices at the end of each trading session. End-of-day prices are vital pieces of market data that are widely used by investors, traders, and financial institutions to monitor the performance and value of these assets over time.

‍

Top 5 used data fields in the End-of-Day Pricing Dataset for Netherlands:

1. Equity Closing Price :The closing price of individual company stocks at the end of the trading day.This field provides insights into the final price at which market participants were willing to buy or sell shares of a specific company.

2. Bond Closing Price: The closing price of various fixed-income securities, including government bonds, corporate bonds, and municipal bonds. Bond investors use this field to assess the current market value of their bond holdings.

3. Index Closing Price: The closing value of market indices, such as the Botswana stock market index, at the end of the trading day. These indices track the overall market performance and direction.

4. Equity Ticker Symbol: The unique symbol used to identify individual company stocks. Ticker symbols facilitate efficient trading and data retrieval.

5. Date of Closing Price: The specific trading day for which the closing price is provided. This date is essential for historical analysis and trend monitoring.

‍

Top 5 financial instruments with End-of-Day Pricing Data in Netherlands:

Amsterdam Stock Exchange (AEX) Domestic Company Index: The main index that tracks the performance of domestic companies listed on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange. This index provides an overview of the overall market performance in the Netherlands.

Amsterdam Stock Exchange (AEX) Foreign Company Index: The index that tracks the performance of foreign companies listed on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange. This index reflects the performance of international companies operating in the Netherlands.

Company A: A prominent Dutch company with diversified operations across various sectors, such as technology, healthcare, or finance. This company's stock is widely traded on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange.

Company B: A leading financial institution in the Netherlands, offering banking, insurance, or investment services. This company's stock is actively traded on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange.

Company C: A major player in the Dutch energy or consumer goods sector, involved in the production and distribution of related products. This company's stock is listed and actively traded on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange.

‍

If you're interested in accessing Techsalerator's End-of-Day Pricing Data for Netherlands, please contact info@techsalerator.com with your specific requirements. Techsalerator will provide you with a customized quote based on the number of data fields and records you need. The dataset can be delivered within 24 hours, and ongoing access options can be discussed if needed.

‍

Data fields included:

Equity Ticker Symbol Equity Closing Price Bond Ticker Symbol Bond Closing Price Index Ticker Symbol Index Closing Price Date of Closing Price Equity Name Equity Volume Equity High Price Equity Low Price Equity Open Price Bond Name Bond Coupon Rate Bond Maturity Index Name Index Change Index Percent Change Exchange Currency Total Market Capitalization Dividend Yield Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E) ‍

Q&A:

1. How much does the End-of-Day Pricing Data cost in Netherlands ?

The cost of this dataset may vary depending on factors such as the number of data fields, the frequency of updates, and the total records count. For precise pricing details, it is recommended to directly consult with a Techsalerator Data specialist.

1. How complete is the End-of-Day Pricing Data coverage in Netherlands?

Techsalerator provides comprehensive coverage of End-of-Day Pricing Data for various financial instruments, including equities, bonds, and indices. Thedataset encompasses major companies and securities traded on Netherlands exchanges.

1. How does Techsalerator collect this data?

Techsalerator collects End-of-Day Pricing Data from reliable sources, including stock exchanges, financial news outlets, and other market data providers. Data is carefully curated to ensure accuracy and reliability.

1. Can I select specific financial instruments or multiple countries with Techsalerator's End-of-Day Pricing Data?

Techsalerator offers the flexibility to select specific financial instruments, such as equities, bonds, or indices, depending on your needs. While the dataset focuses on Botswana, Techsalerator also provides data for other countries and international markets.

1. How do I pay for this dataset?

Techsalerator accepts various payment method...

This dataset provides information about the number of properties, residents, and average property values for Representative Lane cross streets in Knoxville, TN.

A major goal in drug design is the improvement of computational methods for docking and scoring. The Community Structure Activity Resource (CSAR) has collected several data sets from industry and added in-house data sets that may be used for this purpose (www.csardock.org). CSAR has currently obtained data from Abbott, GlaxoSmithKline, and Vertex and is working on obtaining data from several others. Combined with our in-house projects, we are providing a data set consisting of 6 protein targets, 647 compounds with biological affinities, and 82 crystal structures. Multiple congeneric series are available for several targets with a few representative crystal structures of each of the series. These series generally contain a few inactive compounds, usually not available in the literature, to provide an upper bound to the affinity range. The affinity ranges are typically 3–4 orders of magnitude per series. For our in-house projects, we have had compounds synthesized for biological testing. Affinities were measured by Thermofluor, Octet RED, and isothermal titration calorimetry for the most soluble. This allows the direct comparison of the biological affinities for those compounds, providing a measure of the variance in the experimental affinity. It appears that there can be considerable variance in the absolute value of the affinity, making the prediction of the absolute value ill-defined. However, the relative rankings within the methods are much better, and this fits with the observation that predicting relative ranking is a more tractable problem computationally. For those in-house compounds, we also have measured the following physical properties: logD, logP, thermodynamic solubility, and pKa. This data set also provides a substantial decoy set for each target consisting of diverse conformations covering the entire active site for all of the 58 CSAR-quality crystal structures. The CSAR data sets (CSAR-NRC HiQ and the 2012 release) provide substantial, publically available, curated data sets for use in parametrizing and validating docking and scoring methods.

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Integrated Water Availability Assessments (IWAAs) Program is designed to deliver nationally consistent assessments of water supplies for human and ecological needs, and to identify factors that influence water availability. In support of these studies, a National-Extent Hydrogeologic Framework (NEHF) is under development. The NEHF is a three-dimensional digital representation of the subsurface of the United States. Three depth zones are of particular interest: a shallow zone within which groundwater interacts with streams (meters to tens of meters); an intermediate zone comprised of potable water (tens to hundreds of meters); and deep, saline groundwater (hundreds of meters to kilometers). Laterally, the NEHF will be developed at a 1-kilometer (km) resolution across the continental United States (CONUS). Vertically, the NEHF will extend from the land surface to a depth of several kilometers. The vertical resolution of the NEHF will vary, with relatively fine resolution at shallow depth and relatively coarse resolution at depth. Soils are a part of the shallow groundwater system, and soil properties can be used to develop predictive models for characteristics of the deeper subsurface. The NEHF is utilizing the Polaris soil properties data set (Chaney et al, 2019) because it harmonizes the previously published Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO, USDA NRCS, 2023) and the National Cooperative Soil Survey Soil Characterization (USDA, 2023) databases. The Polaris database includes soil properties such as soil texture, which is the percentage of sand, silt, or clay present in a soil as well as saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat), which indicates the ease with which water can move through the soil. Soil hydraulic conductivity can vary spatially, and representative values of a heterogeneous distribution can be obtained in one of several ways, including the geometric mean. The geometric mean provides an estimate of the mean value of a log-normal distribution; soil hydraulic conductivity is often log-normally distributed. Raster data are provided at a 30-meter (m) resolution across the contiguous United States for six depth zones: 0-5 centimeters (cm), 5-15 cm, 15-30 cm, 30-60 cm, 60-100 cm, and 100-200 cm. The rasters in this Data Release provide a weighted average value over the six depth intervals rescaled to a resolution of 1-km and 100-m. These rasters can be used in the development of the NEHF and for other purposes. A total of 11 rasters are included in the data release. They include the following: Soil Texture (SoilTextureRasters_100m.7z; SoilTextureRasters_1km.7z): Values range from 1 - 99% (values may not add up to 100% as they represent a weighted mean, as well as a change in resolution from the source files). The specific ranges for each property can be found in the metadata.xml files for each raster. Mean Percent Sand at 1-km and 100-m resolution (2 rasters: sand_1km.tif and sand_100m.tif). Mean Percent Clay at 1-km and 100-m resolution (2 rasters: clay_1km.tif and clay_100m.tif) Mean Percent Silt at 1-km and 100-m resolution (2 rasters: silt_1km.tif and silt_100m.tif) Classified Soil Texture at 1km (1 raster: texture_3class.tif): The above three soil texture rasters were classified into three categories based on the percentages of each soil property within a 1-km cell. Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (SaturatedHydraulicConductivity_100m.7z; SaturatedHydraulicConductivity_1km.7z): Values range from -2.4 to 2.1 in the logarithmic scale, and 0-126.3 for the arithmetic mean. The specific ranges for each property can be found in the metadata.xml files for each raster. Logarithmic Saturated Hydraulic Soil Conductivity (KSat) at 1-km and 100-m resolution (2 rasters: KSat_Log_100m.tif; KSat_Log_100m.tif): KSat rasters in the Polaris Soils database were provided as logarithmic values. Arithmetic Saturated Hydraulic Soil Conductivity (KSat) at 1-km and 100-m resolution (2 rasters: KSat_Arithmetic_100m.tif; KSat_Arithmetic_100m.tif): The logarithmic values were transformed into the arithmetic values to determine a geometric mean value.

Techsalerator offers an extensive dataset of End-of-Day Pricing Data for all 214 companies listed on the Panama Stock Exchange (XPTY) in Panama. This dataset includes the closing prices of equities (stocks), bonds, and indices at the end of each trading session. End-of-day prices are vital pieces of market data that are widely used by investors, traders, and financial institutions to monitor the performance and value of these assets over time.

‍

Top 5 used data fields in the End-of-Day Pricing Dataset for Panama:

1. Equity Closing Price :The closing price of individual company stocks at the end of the trading day.This field provides insights into the final price at which market participants were willing to buy or sell shares of a specific company.

2. Bond Closing Price: The closing price of various fixed-income securities, including government bonds, corporate bonds, and municipal bonds. Bond investors use this field to assess the current market value of their bond holdings.

3. Index Closing Price: The closing value of market indices, such as the Botswana stock market index, at the end of the trading day. These indices track the overall market performance and direction.

4. Equity Ticker Symbol: The unique symbol used to identify individual company stocks. Ticker symbols facilitate efficient trading and data retrieval.

5. Date of Closing Price: The specific trading day for which the closing price is provided. This date is essential for historical analysis and trend monitoring.

‍

Top 5 financial instruments with End-of-Day Pricing Data in Panama:

Panamanian Stock Exchange Domestic Company Index: The main index that tracks the performance of domestic companies listed on the Panamanian Stock Exchange (Bolsa de Valores de Panamá). This index provides an overview of the overall market performance in Panama.

Panamanian Stock Exchange Foreign Company Index: The index that tracks the performance of foreign companies listed on the Panamanian Stock Exchange. This index reflects the performance of international companies operating in Panama.

Company A: A prominent Panamanian company with diversified operations across various sectors, such as shipping, logistics, or finance. This company's stock is widely traded on the Panamanian Stock Exchange.

Company B: A leading financial institution in Panama, offering banking, insurance, or investment services. This company's stock is actively traded on the Panamanian Stock Exchange.

Company C: A major player in the Panamanian energy or real estate sector, involved in the production and distribution of related products. This company's stock is listed and actively traded on the Panamanian Stock Exchange.

‍

If you're interested in accessing Techsalerator's End-of-Day Pricing Data for Panama, please contact info@techsalerator.com with your specific requirements. Techsalerator will provide you with a customized quote based on the number of data fields and records you need. The dataset can be delivered within 24 hours, and ongoing access options can be discussed if needed.

‍

Data fields included:

Equity Ticker Symbol Equity Closing Price Bond Ticker Symbol Bond Closing Price Index Ticker Symbol Index Closing Price Date of Closing Price Equity Name Equity Volume Equity High Price Equity Low Price Equity Open Price Bond Name Bond Coupon Rate Bond Maturity Index Name Index Change Index Percent Change Exchange Currency Total Market Capitalization Dividend Yield Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E) ‍

Q&A:

1. How much does the End-of-Day Pricing Data cost in Panama ?

The cost of this dataset may vary depending on factors such as the number of data fields, the frequency of updates, and the total records count. For precise pricing details, it is recommended to directly consult with a Techsalerator Data specialist.

1. How complete is the End-of-Day Pricing Data coverage in Panama?

Techsalerator provides comprehensive coverage of End-of-Day Pricing Data for various financial instruments, including equities, bonds, and indices. Thedataset encompasses major companies and securities traded on Panama exchanges.

1. How does Techsalerator collect this data?

Techsalerator collects End-of-Day Pricing Data from reliable sources, including stock exchanges, financial news outlets, and other market data providers. Data is carefully curated to ensure accuracy and reliability.

1. Can I select specific financial instruments or multiple countries with Techsalerator's End-of-Day Pricing Data?

Techsalerator offers the flexibility to select specific financial instruments, such as equities, bonds, or indices, depending on your needs. While the dataset focuses on Botswana, Techsalerator also provides data for other countries and international markets.

1. How do I pay for this dataset?

Techsalerator accepts various payment methods, including credit cards, direc...

Full edition for scientific use. The COVID-19 pandemic offers unique opportunity - a natural experiment indeed - to study how people’s moral values change during times of crises. In the face of lacking evidence, we cannot take it for granted that the stability of values observed in normal times continues throughout the Corona crisis. This dataset represents the Austrian data of the first wave of a longitudinal study which is conducted in several countries all over the world. A second wave is planned in 2021, a third wave about one year after the crisis. Under the current contact restrictions, using an online panel is the only option to achieve potentially representative data of the Austrian population. The study investigates basic values (measured with classical value concepts such as the Inglehart Index and the short Portraits Values Questionnaire (by Shalom Schwartz) which is also implemented in the European Social Survey). Additional item batteries refer to concepts which are grounded in personality research (e.g. Big Five and Empathy), exposure to the crisis and perceptions of economic consequences. In the Austrian dataset several items of the Social Survey Austria about social, political and environmental attitudes are repeated as well and new concepts about visions of the future after COVID-19 are included as well. The main aim of the study is to figure out how respondents’ perception of the crisis transforms and how these value changes are linked to moral values and social and political attitudes.

Techsalerator offers an extensive dataset of End-of-Day Pricing Data for all 66 companies listed on the Nairobi Securities Exchange (XNAI) in Kenya. This dataset includes the closing prices of equities (stocks), bonds, and indices at the end of each trading session. End-of-day prices are vital pieces of market data that are widely used by investors, traders, and financial institutions to monitor the performance and value of these assets over time.

‍

Top 5 used data fields in the End-of-Day Pricing Dataset for Kenya:

1. Equity Closing Price :The closing price of individual company stocks at the end of the trading day.This field provides insights into the final price at which market participants were willing to buy or sell shares of a specific company.

2. Bond Closing Price: The closing price of various fixed-income securities, including government bonds, corporate bonds, and municipal bonds. Bond investors use this field to assess the current market value of their bond holdings.

3. Index Closing Price: The closing value of market indices, such as the Botswana stock market index, at the end of the trading day. These indices track the overall market performance and direction.

4. Equity Ticker Symbol: The unique symbol used to identify individual company stocks. Ticker symbols facilitate efficient trading and data retrieval.

5. Date of Closing Price: The specific trading day for which the closing price is provided. This date is essential for historical analysis and trend monitoring.

‍

Top 5 financial instruments with End-of-Day Pricing Data in Kenya:

Nairobi Securities Exchange All Share Index (NASI): The main index that tracks the performance of all companies listed on the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE). NASI provides insights into the overall market performance in Kenya.

Nairobi Securities Exchange 20 Share Index (NSE 20): An index that tracks the performance of the top 20 companies by market capitalization listed on the NSE. NSE 20 is an important benchmark for the Kenyan stock market.

Safaricom PLC: A leading telecommunications company in Kenya, offering mobile and internet services. Safaricom is one of the largest and most actively traded companies on the NSE.

Equity Group Holdings PLC: A prominent financial institution in Kenya, providing banking and financial services. Equity Group is a significant player in the Kenyan financial sector and is listed on the NSE.

KCB Group PLC: Another major financial institution in Kenya, offering banking and financial services. KCB Group is also listed on the NSE and is among the key players in the country's banking industry.

‍

If you're interested in accessing Techsalerator's End-of-Day Pricing Data for Kenya, please contact info@techsalerator.com with your specific requirements. Techsalerator will provide you with a customized quote based on the number of data fields and records you need. The dataset can be delivered within 24 hours, and ongoing access options can be discussed if needed.

‍

Data fields included:

Equity Ticker Symbol Equity Closing Price Bond Ticker Symbol Bond Closing Price Index Ticker Symbol Index Closing Price Date of Closing Price Equity Name Equity Volume Equity High Price Equity Low Price Equity Open Price Bond Name Bond Coupon Rate Bond Maturity Index Name Index Change Index Percent Change Exchange Currency Total Market Capitalization Dividend Yield Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E) ‍

Q&A:

1. How much does the End-of-Day Pricing Data cost in Kenya ?

The cost of this dataset may vary depending on factors such as the number of data fields, the frequency of updates, and the total records count. For precise pricing details, it is recommended to directly consult with a Techsalerator Data specialist.

1. How complete is the End-of-Day Pricing Data coverage in Kenya?

Techsalerator provides comprehensive coverage of End-of-Day Pricing Data for various financial instruments, including equities, bonds, and indices. Thedataset encompasses major companies and securities traded on Kenya exchanges.

1. How does Techsalerator collect this data?

Techsalerator collects End-of-Day Pricing Data from reliable sources, including stock exchanges, financial news outlets, and other market data providers. Data is carefully curated to ensure accuracy and reliability.

1. Can I select specific financial instruments or multiple countries with Techsalerator's End-of-Day Pricing Data?

Techsalerator offers the flexibility to select specific financial instruments, such as equities, bonds, or indices, depending on your needs. While the dataset focuses on Botswana, Techsalerator also provides data for other countries and international markets.

1. How do I pay for this dataset?

Techsalerator accepts various payment methods, including credit cards, direct transfers, ACH, and wire transfers, facilitating a convenient and se...

This dataset provides monthly summaries of evapotranspiration (ET) data from OpenET v2.0 image collections for the period 2008-2023 for all National Watershed Boundary Dataset subwatersheds (12-digit hydrologic unit codes [HUC12s]) in the US that overlap the spatial extent of OpenET datasets. For each HUC12, this dataset contains spatial aggregation statistics (minimum, mean, median, and maximum) for each of the ET variables from each of the publicly available image collections from OpenET for the six available models (DisALEXI, eeMETRIC, geeSEBAL, PT-JPL, SIMS, SSEBop) and the Ensemble image collection, which is a pixel-wise ensemble of all 6 individual models after filtering and removal of outliers according to the median absolute deviation approach (Melton and others, 2022). Data are available in this data release in two different formats: comma-separated values (CSV) and parquet, a high-performance format that is optimized for storage and processing of columnar data. CSV files containing data for each 4-digit HUC are grouped by 2-digit HUCs for easier access of regional data, and the single parquet file provides convenient access to the entire dataset. For each of the ET models (DisALEXI, eeMETRIC, geeSEBAL, PT-JPL, SIMS, SSEBop), variables in the model-specific CSV data files include: -huc12: The 12-digit hydrologic unit code -ET: Actual evapotranspiration (in millimeters) over the HUC12 area in the month calculated as the sum of daily ET interpolated between Landsat overpasses -statistic: Max, mean, median, or min. Statistic used in the spatial aggregation within each HUC12. For example, maximum ET is the maximum monthly pixel ET value occurring within the HUC12 boundary after summing daily ET in the month -year: 4-digit year -month: 2-digit month -count: Number of Landsat overpasses included in the ET calculation in the month -et_coverage_pct: Integer percentage of the HUC12 with ET data, which can be used to determine how representative the ET statistic is of the entire HUC12 -count_coverage_pct: Integer percentage of the HUC12 with count data, which can be different than the et_coverage_pct value because the “count” band in the source image collection extends beyond the “et” band in the eastern portion of the image collection extent For the Ensemble data, these additional variables are included in the CSV files: -et_mad: Ensemble ET value, computed as the mean of the ensemble after filtering outliers using the median absolute deviation (MAD) -et_mad_count: The number of models used to compute the ensemble ET value after filtering for outliers using the MAD -et_mad_max: The maximum value in the ensemble range, after filtering for outliers using the MAD -et_mad_min: The minimum value in the ensemble range, after filtering for outliers using the MAD -et_sam: A simple arithmetic mean (across the 6 models) of actual ET average without outlier removal Below are the locations of each OpenET image collection used in this summary: DisALEXI: https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/OpenET_DISALEXI_CONUS_GRIDMET_MONTHLY_v2_0 eeMETRIC: https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/OpenET_EEMETRIC_CONUS_GRIDMET_MONTHLY_v2_0 geeSEBAL: https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/OpenET_GEESEBAL_CONUS_GRIDMET_MONTHLY_v2_0 PT-JPL: https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/OpenET_PTJPL_CONUS_GRIDMET_MONTHLY_v2_0 SIMS: https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/OpenET_SIMS_CONUS_GRIDMET_MONTHLY_v2_0 SSEBop: https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/OpenET_SSEBOP_CONUS_GRIDMET_MONTHLY_v2_0 Ensemble: https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/OpenET_ENSEMBLE_CONUS_GRIDMET_MONTHLY_v2_0