Data Quality Management Software Market size was valued at USD 4.32 Billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 10.73 Billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 17.75% during the forecast period 2024-2030.

Global Data Quality Management Software Market Drivers

The growth and development of the Data Quality Management Software Market can be credited with a few key market drivers. Several of the major market drivers are listed below:

Growing Data Volumes: Organizations are facing difficulties in managing and guaranteeing the quality of massive volumes of data due to the exponential growth of data generated by consumers and businesses. Organizations can identify, clean up, and preserve high-quality data from a variety of data sources and formats with the use of data quality management software.
Increasing Complexity of Data Ecosystems: Organizations function within ever-more-complex data ecosystems, which are made up of a variety of systems, formats, and data sources. Software for data quality management enables the integration, standardization, and validation of data from various sources, guaranteeing accuracy and consistency throughout the data landscape.
Regulatory Compliance Requirements: Organizations must maintain accurate, complete, and secure data in order to comply with regulations like the GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, and others. Data quality management software ensures data accuracy, integrity, and privacy, which assists organizations in meeting regulatory requirements.
Growing Adoption of Business Intelligence and Analytics: As BI and analytics tools are used more frequently for data-driven decision-making, there is a greater need for high-quality data. With the help of data quality management software, businesses can extract actionable insights and generate significant business value by cleaning, enriching, and preparing data for analytics.
Focus on Customer Experience: Put the Customer Experience First: Businesses understand that providing excellent customer experiences requires high-quality data. By ensuring data accuracy, consistency, and completeness across customer touchpoints, data quality management software assists businesses in fostering more individualized interactions and higher customer satisfaction.
Initiatives for Data Migration and Integration: Organizations must clean up, transform, and move data across heterogeneous environments as part of data migration and integration projects like cloud migration, system upgrades, and mergers and acquisitions. Software for managing data quality offers procedures and instruments to guarantee the accuracy and consistency of transferred data.
Need for Data Governance and Stewardship: The implementation of efficient data governance and stewardship practises is imperative to guarantee data quality, consistency, and compliance. Data governance initiatives are supported by data quality management software, which offers features like rule-based validation, data profiling, and lineage tracking.
Operational Efficiency and Cost Reduction: Inadequate data quality can lead to errors, higher operating costs, and inefficiencies for organizations. By guaranteeing high-quality data across business processes, data quality management software helps organizations increase operational efficiency, decrease errors, and minimize rework.

Objective: Routine primary care data may be used for the derivation of clinical prediction rules and risk scores. We sought to measure the impact of a decision support system (DSS) on data completeness and freedom from bias.

Materials and Methods: We used the clinical documentation of 34 UK General Practitioners who took part in a previous study evaluating the DSS. They consulted with 12 standardized patients. In addition to suggesting diagnoses, the DSS facilitates data coding. We compared the documentation from consultations with the electronic health record (EHR) (baseline consultations) vs. consultations with the EHR-integrated DSS (supported consultations). We measured the proportion of EHR data items related to the physician’s final diagnosis. We expected that in baseline consultations, physicians would document only or predominantly observations related to their diagnosis, while in supported consultations, they would also document other observations as a result of exploring more diagnoses and/or ease of coding.

Results: Supported documentation contained significantly more codes (IRR=5.76 [4.31, 7.70] P<0.001) and less free text (IRR = 0.32 [0.27, 0.40] P<0.001) than baseline documentation. As expected, the proportion of diagnosis-related data was significantly lower (b=-0.08 [-0.11, -0.05] P<0.001) in the supported consultations, and this was the case for both codes and free text.

Conclusions: We provide evidence that data entry in the EHR is incomplete and reflects physicians’ cognitive biases. This has serious implications for epidemiological research that uses routine data. A DSS that facilitates and motivates data entry during the consultation can improve routine documentation.

Neural networks associated with the paper "Photometric Completeness Modelled With Neural Networks" (Harris & Speagle 2023).

Neural networks (`nn_clf_[...].joblib`) are included for all possible parameter combinations and trained over various numbers of artificial star tests (`ngc[...].dat`). See the example notebook (`nn_example.ipynb`) for detailed explanations of the files, their contents, and some usage examples.

Hourly ground-level ozone (O3) concentrations were estimated with CHRONOS (Canadian Hemispherical Regional Ozone and NOx System) model from 2002 to 2009, and with GEM-MACH (Global Environmental Multi-scale Modelling Air Quality and Chemistry) model from 2010 to 2015, by Environment and Climate Change Canada staff. Estimates incorporate ground-level observation data. Please note that Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) provides data air quality data directly - see the ECCC End Use Licence.pdf file referenced above under Supporting Documentation.These datasets were used by CANUE staff to calculate values of annual mean concentration of O3, for all postal codes in Canada for each year from 2002 to 2015 (DMTI Spatial, 2015). (THESE DATA ARE ALSO AVAILABLE AS MONTHLY METRICS).

The association between facility characteristics and the risk that records contained missing values during baseline RDQAs.

Success.ai’s Company Data Solutions provide businesses with powerful, enterprise-ready B2B company datasets, enabling you to unlock insights on over 28 million verified company profiles. Our solution is ideal for organizations seeking accurate and detailed B2B contact data, whether you’re targeting large enterprises, mid-sized businesses, or small business contact data.

Success.ai offers B2B marketing data across industries and geographies, tailored to fit your specific business needs. With our white-glove service, you’ll receive curated, ready-to-use company datasets without the hassle of managing data platforms yourself. Whether you’re looking for UK B2B data or global datasets, Success.ai ensures a seamless experience with the most accurate and up-to-date information in the market.

Why Choose Success.ai’s Company Data Solution? At Success.ai, we prioritize quality and relevancy. Every company profile is AI-validated for a 99% accuracy rate and manually reviewed to ensure you're accessing actionable and GDPR-compliant data. Our price match guarantee ensures you receive the best deal on the market, while our white-glove service provides personalized assistance in sourcing and delivering the data you need.

Why Choose Success.ai?

• Best Price Guarantee: We offer industry-leading pricing and beat any competitor.
• Global Reach: Access over 28 million verified company profiles across 195 countries.
• Comprehensive Data: Over 15 data points, including company size, industry, funding, and technologies used.
• Accurate & Verified: AI-validated with a 99% accuracy rate, ensuring high-quality data.
• Real-Time Updates: Stay ahead with continuously updated company information.
• Ethically Sourced Data: Our B2B data is compliant with global privacy laws, ensuring responsible use.
• Dedicated Service: Receive personalized, curated data without the hassle of managing platforms.
• Tailored Solutions: Custom datasets are built to fit your unique business needs and industries.

Our database spans 195 countries and covers 28 million public and private company profiles, with detailed insights into each company’s structure, size, funding history, and key technologies. We provide B2B company data for businesses of all sizes, from small business contact data to large corporations, with extensive coverage in regions such as North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America.

Comprehensive Data Points: Success.ai delivers in-depth information on each company, with over 15 data points, including:

Company Name: Get the full legal name of the company. LinkedIn URL: Direct link to the company's LinkedIn profile. Company Domain: Website URL for more detailed research. Company Description: Overview of the company’s services and products. Company Location: Geographic location down to the city, state, and country. Company Industry: The sector or industry the company operates in. Employee Count: Number of employees to help identify company size. Technologies Used: Insights into key technologies employed by the company, valuable for tech-based outreach. Funding Information: Track total funding and the most recent funding dates for investment opportunities. Maximize Your Sales Potential: With Success.ai’s B2B contact data and company datasets, sales teams can build tailored lists of target accounts, identify decision-makers, and access real-time company intelligence. Our curated datasets ensure you’re always focused on high-value leads—those who are most likely to convert into clients. Whether you’re conducting account-based marketing (ABM), expanding your sales pipeline, or looking to improve your lead generation strategies, Success.ai offers the resources you need to scale your business efficiently.

Tailored for Your Industry: Success.ai serves multiple industries, including technology, healthcare, finance, manufacturing, and more. Our B2B marketing data solutions are particularly valuable for businesses looking to reach professionals in key sectors. You’ll also have access to small business contact data, perfect for reaching new markets or uncovering high-growth startups.

From UK B2B data to contacts across Europe and Asia, our datasets provide global coverage to expand your business reach and identify new markets. With continuous data updates, Success.ai ensures you’re always working with the freshest information.

Key Use Cases:

• Targeted Lead Generation: Build accurate lead lists by filtering data by company size, industry, or location. Target decision-makers in key industries to streamline your B2B sales outreach.
• Account-Based Marketing (ABM): Use B2B company data to personalize marketing campaigns, focusing on high-value accounts and improving conversion rates.
• Investment Research: Track company growth, funding rounds, and employee trends to identify investment opportunities or potential M&A targets.
• Market Research: Enrich your market intelligence initiatives by gain...

Making clinical audit data transparent In his transparency and open data letter to Cabinet Ministers on 7 July 2011, the Prime Minister restated the commitment to make clinical audit data available from the national audits within the National Clinical Audit and Patient Outcomes Programme. The National Lung Cancer Audit (NLCA) was identified as the pilot for this data release. The data was released in an open and standardised format for the first time in December 2011, and each year onward, data from the National Lung Cancer Audit will be made available in CSV format. The data are also being made available on the data.gov website. Covering all Strategic Clinical Networks and NHS Trusts in England, the data from the audit includes information about data completeness, audit process and outcome measures. The data will be available in a pdf format with the National Lung Cancer Audit 2014 annual report. What information is being made available? Measures about the process of care given to patients Information about care outcomes and treatment. The data also provides Audit participation by Trust and data completeness for the key fields. This data does not list data about individual patients nor does it contain any patient identifiable data. Using and interpreting the data Data from the National Lung Cancer Audit requires careful interpretation, and the information should not be looked at in isolation when assessing standards of care. Data is analysed either by cancer network or by place first seen in secondary care for the calendar year 2013 (except where noted). As a result, some trusts that only provide some specialist treatments for patients and do not routinely supply diagnostic data are not properly represented in these data. This is because all the analyses of the NLCA to date have been carried out by 'place first seen' and clinical networks. The 'place first seen' most closely represents the Clinical Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) which makes the first treatment decisions (in partnership with representatives from the specialist centres who sit on these peripheral MDTs). We largely know the population base for these MDTs and that number provides the 'denominator' for the outcome measures. It is much more difficult to define a population denominator for specialist centres and the treatment they provide is usually only one part of a complex care pathway. So taking the raw data at face value gives a very distorted picture both of their activity and performance. Accessing the data The data are being made available on the data.gov website. Each year three files of data from the National Lung Cancer Audit will be made available in CSV format. Trusts and Networks are identified by name and their national code. What does the data cover? The data measure levels of completeness for data submitted to the NLCA and measures of performance in the audit at trust level for key performance measures for assessing standards of care for lung cancer in secondary care. Details of these standards can be found in appendix 2 of the NLCA report. Are all Trusts included? All Trusts in England that manage patients diagnosed with lung cancer (excluding mesothelioma) are included. The audit also covers Wales. What period does the data cover? This data were extracted from the NLCA database in July 2014 and covers patients first seen in the calendar year 2013 (except where noted).

Estimations of civil registration completeness within 12 months of birth or 12 months of death. These estimates are drawn from SPC Country profiles or from presentations made at the 2023 Pacific Civil Registrars Meeting.

Find more Pacific data on PDH.stat.

Completeness of birth registration (%) in Palestine was reported at 99.2 % in 2020, according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized sources. Palestine - Completeness of birth registration - actual values, historical data, forecasts and projections were sourced from the World Bank on March of 2025.

Release of NLCD 2006 provides the first land-cover change database for the Conterminous United States (CONUS) from Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Accuracy assessment of NLCD 2006 focused on four primary products: 2001 land cover, 2006 land cover, land-cover change between 2001 and 2006, and impervious surface change between 2001 and 2006. The accuracy assessment was conducted by selecting a stratified random sample of pixels with the reference classification interpreted from multi-temporal high resolution digital imagery. The NLCD Level II (16 classes) overall accuracies for the 2001 and 2006 land cover were 79% and 78%, respectively, with Level II user's accuracies exceeding 80% for water, high density urban, all upland forest classes, shrubland, and cropland for both dates. Level I (8 classes) accuracies were 85% for NLCD 2001 and 84% for NLCD 2006. The high overall and user's accuracies for the individual dates translated into high user's accuracies for the 2001–2006 change reporting themes for water gain and loss, forest loss, urban gain, and the no-change reporting themes for water, urban, forest, and agriculture.

Derived data and R scripts for analyzing the data consistency of Howells' craniometric data sets.

Data DescriptionThe DIPSER dataset is designed to assess student attention and emotion in in-person classroom settings, consisting of RGB camera data, smartwatch sensor data, and labeled attention and emotion metrics. It includes multiple camera angles per student to capture posture and facial expressions, complemented by smartwatch data for inertial and biometric metrics. Attention and emotion labels are derived from self-reports and expert evaluations. The dataset includes diverse demographic groups, with data collected in real-world classroom environments, facilitating the training of machine learning models for predicting attention and correlating it with emotional states.Data Collection and Generation ProceduresThe dataset was collected in a natural classroom environment at the University of Alicante, Spain. The recording setup consisted of six general cameras positioned to capture the overall classroom context and individual cameras placed at each student’s desk. Additionally, smartwatches were used to collect biometric data, such as heart rate, accelerometer, and gyroscope readings.Experimental SessionsNine distinct educational activities were designed to ensure a comprehensive range of engagement scenarios:News Reading – Students read projected or device-displayed news.Brainstorming Session – Idea generation for problem-solving.Lecture – Passive listening to an instructor-led session.Information Organization – Synthesizing information from different sources.Lecture Test – Assessment of lecture content via mobile devices.Individual Presentations – Students present their projects.Knowledge Test – Conducted using Kahoot.Robotics Experimentation – Hands-on session with robotics.MTINY Activity Design – Development of educational activities with computational thinking.Technical SpecificationsRGB Cameras: Individual cameras recorded at 640×480 pixels, while context cameras captured at 1280×720 pixels.Frame Rate: 9-10 FPS depending on the setup.Smartwatch Sensors: Collected heart rate, accelerometer, gyroscope, rotation vector, and light sensor data at a frequency of 1–100 Hz.Data Organization and FormatsThe dataset follows a structured directory format:/groupX/experimentY/subjectZ.zip Each subject-specific folder contains:images/ (individual facial images)watch_sensors/ (sensor readings in JSON format)labels/ (engagement & emotion annotations)metadata/ (subject demographics & session details)Annotations and LabelingEach data entry includes engagement levels (1-5) and emotional states (9 categories) based on both self-reported labels and evaluations by four independent experts. A custom annotation tool was developed to ensure consistency across evaluations.Missing Data and Data QualitySynchronization: A centralized server ensured time alignment across devices. Brightness changes were used to verify synchronization.Completeness: No major missing data, except for occasional random frame drops due to embedded device performance.Data Consistency: Uniform collection methodology across sessions, ensuring high reliability.Data Processing MethodsTo enhance usability, the dataset includes preprocessed bounding boxes for face, body, and hands, along with gaze estimation and head pose annotations. These were generated using YOLO, MediaPipe, and DeepFace.File Formats and AccessibilityImages: Stored in standard JPEG format.Sensor Data: Provided as structured JSON files.Labels: Available as CSV files with timestamps.The dataset is publicly available under the CC-BY license and can be accessed along with the necessary processing scripts via the DIPSER GitHub repository.Potential Errors and LimitationsDue to camera angles, some student movements may be out of frame in collaborative sessions.Lighting conditions vary slightly across experiments.Sensor latency variations are minimal but exist due to embedded device constraints.CitationIf you find this project helpful for your research, please cite our work using the following bibtex entry:@misc{marquezcarpintero2025dipserdatasetinpersonstudent1, title={DIPSER: A Dataset for In-Person Student1 Engagement Recognition in the Wild}, author={Luis Marquez-Carpintero and Sergio Suescun-Ferrandiz and Carolina Lorenzo Álvarez and Jorge Fernandez-Herrero and Diego Viejo and Rosabel Roig-Vila and Miguel Cazorla}, year={2025}, eprint={2502.20209}, archivePrefix={arXiv}, primaryClass={cs.CV}, url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.20209}, } Usage and ReproducibilityResearchers can utilize standard tools like OpenCV, TensorFlow, and PyTorch for analysis. The dataset supports research in machine learning, affective computing, and education analytics, offering a unique resource for engagement and attention studies in real-world classroom environments.

After May 3, 2024, this dataset and webpage will no longer be updated because hospitals are no longer required to report data on COVID-19 hospital admissions, and hospital capacity and occupancy data, to HHS through CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. Data voluntarily reported to NHSN after May 1, 2024, will be available starting May 10, 2024, at COVID Data Tracker Hospitalizations.

This report shows data completeness information on data submitted by hospitals for the previous week, from Friday to Thursday. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services requires all hospitals licensed to provide 24-hour care to report certain data necessary to the all-of-America COVID-19 response. The report includes the following information for each hospital:

• The percentage of mandatory fields reported.
• The number of days in the preceding week where 100% of the fields were completed.
• Whether a hospital is required to report on Wednesdays only.
• A cell for each required field with the number of days that specific field was reported for the week.