This dataset contains linework of lineaments mapped on 4 <1-m-resolution lidar datasets and the 10-m-resolution National Elevation Dataset digital elevation models in the Pit River region of northeastern California. Lineaments are classified by confidence in tectonic origin, map certainty, and the ages of the bedrock and surficial deposits they cross.

The LIDAR Composite DTM (Digital Terrain Model) is a raster elevation model covering ~99% of England at 1m spatial resolution. The DTM (Digital Terrain Model) is produced from the last or only laser pulse returned to the sensor. We remove surface objects from the Digital Surface Model (DSM), using bespoke algorithms and manual editing of the data, to produce a terrain model of just the surface.

Produced by the Environment Agency in 2022, the DTM is derived from a combination of our Time Stamped archive and National LIDAR Programme surveys, which have been merged and re-sampled to give the best possible coverage. Where repeat surveys have been undertaken the newest, best resolution data is used. Where data was resampled a bilinear interpolation was used before being merged.

The 2022 LIDAR Composite contains surveys undertaken between 6th June 2000 and 2nd April 2022. Please refer to the metadata index catalgoues which show for any location which survey was used in the production of the LIDAR composite.

The data is available to download as GeoTiff rasters in 5km tiles aligned to the OS National grid. The data is presented in metres, referenced to Ordinance Survey Newlyn and using the OSTN’15 transformation method. All individual LIDAR surveys going into the production of the composite had a vertical accuracy of +/-15cm RMSE.

This data collection of the 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) consists of Lidar Point Cloud (LPC) projects as provided to the USGS. These point cloud files contain all the original lidar points collected, with the original spatial reference and units preserved. These data may have been used as the source of updates to the 1/3-arcsecond, 1-arcsecond, and 2-arcsecond seamless 3DEP Digital Elevation Models (DEMs). The 3DEP data holdings serve as the elevation layer of The National Map, and provide foundational elevation information for earth science studies and mapping applications in the United States. Lidar (Light detection and ranging) discrete-return point cloud data are available in LAZ format. The LAZ format is a lossless compressed version of the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS) LAS format. Point Cloud data can be converted from LAZ to LAS or LAS to LAZ without the loss of any information. Either format stores 3-dimensional point cloud data and point ...

Note: The files can be downloaded from the Attachments section below. Please note that the total size is 180GB, so the download may take some time depending on your system’s capabilities and configuration. You can also visit https://finder.nyc.gov/orthoimagery to download raw LiDAR data for specific tiles. Topographic and bathymetric LiDAR data was collected for New York City in 2017. Topographic data was collected for the entire city, plus an additional 100 meter buffer, using a Leica ALS80 sensor equipped to capture at least 8 pulse/m2. Dates of capture for topographic data were between 05/03/2017 and 05/17/2017 during 50% leaf-off conditions. Bathymetric data was collected in select areas of the city (where bathymetric data capture was expected) using a Riegl VQ-880-G sensor equipped to capture approximately 15 pulses/m2 (1.5 Secchi depths). Dates of capture for bathymetric were between 07/04/2017 - 07/26/2017. LiDAR data was tidally-coordinated and captured between mean lower low water (+30% of mean tide) ranges. The horizontal datum for all datasets is NAD83, the vertical datum is NAVD88, Geoid 12B, and the data is projected in New York State Plane - Long Island. Units are in US Survey Feet. To learn more about these datasets, visit the interactive “Understanding the 2017 New York City LiDAR Capture” Story Map -- https://maps.nyc.gov/lidar/2017/ Please see the following link for additional documentation on this dataset -- https://github.com/CityOfNewYork/nyc-geo-metadata/blob/master/Metadata/Metadata_LiDAR_Summary.md

The i.c.sens Visual-Inertial-LiDAR Dataset is a data set for the evaluation of dead reckoning or SLAM approaches in the context of mobile robotics. It consists of street-level monocular RGB camera images, a front-facing 180° point cloud, angular velocities, accelerations and an accurate ground truth trajectory. In total, we provide around 77 GB of data resulting from a 15 minutes drive, which is split into 8 rosbags of 2 minutes (10 GB) each. Besides, the intrinsic camera parameters and the extrinsic transformations between all sensor coordinate systems are given. Details on the data and its usage can be found in the provided documentation file.

https://data.uni-hannover.de/dataset/0bcea595-0786-44f6-a9e2-c26a779a004b/resource/0ff90ef9-fa61-4ee3-b69e-eb6461abc57b/download/sensor_platform_small.jpg" alt="">

Image credit: Sören Vogel

The data set was acquired in the context of the measurement campaign described in Schoen2018. Here, a vehicle, which can be seen below, was equipped with a self-developed sensor platform and a commercially available Riegl VMX-250 Mobile Mapping System. This Mobile Mapping System consists of two laser scanners, a camera system and a localization unit containing a highly accurate GNSS/IMU system.

https://data.uni-hannover.de/dataset/0bcea595-0786-44f6-a9e2-c26a779a004b/resource/2a1226b8-8821-4c46-b411-7d63491963ed/download/vehicle_small.jpg" alt="">

Image credit: Sören Vogel

The data acquisition took place in May 2019 during a sunny day in the Nordstadt of Hannover (coordinates: 52.388598, 9.716389). The route we took can be seen below. This route was completed three times in total, which amounts to a total driving time of 15 minutes.

https://data.uni-hannover.de/dataset/0bcea595-0786-44f6-a9e2-c26a779a004b/resource/8a570408-c392-4bd7-9c1e-26964f552d6c/download/google_earth_overview_small.png" alt="">

The self-developed sensor platform consists of several sensors. This dataset provides data from the following sensors:

• Velodyne HDL-64 LiDAR
• LORD MicroStrain 3DM-GQ4-45 GNSS aided IMU
• Pointgrey GS3-U3-23S6C-C RGB camera

To inspect the data, first start a rosmaster and launch rviz using the provided configuration file:

roscore & rosrun rviz rviz -d icsens_data.rviz

Afterwards, start playing a rosbag with

rosbag play icsens-visual-inertial-lidar-dataset-{number}.bag --clock

Below we provide some exemplary images and their corresponding point clouds.

https://data.uni-hannover.de/dataset/0bcea595-0786-44f6-a9e2-c26a779a004b/resource/dc1563c0-9b5f-4c84-b432-711916cb204c/download/combined_examples_small.jpg" alt="">

Related publications:

• R. Voges, C. S. Wieghardt, and B. Wagner, “Finding Timestamp Offsets for a Multi-Sensor System Using Sensor Observations,” Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 357–366, 2018.

• R. Voges and B. Wagner, “RGB-Laser Odometry Under Interval Uncertainty for Guaranteed Localization,” in Book of Abstracts of the 11th Summer Workshop on Interval Methods (SWIM 2018), Rostock, Germany, Jul. 2018.

• R. Voges and B. Wagner, “Timestamp Offset Calibration for an IMU-Camera System Under Interval Uncertainty,” in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Madrid, Spain, Oct. 2018.

• R. Voges and B. Wagner, “Extrinsic Calibration Between a 3D Laser Scanner and a Camera Under Interval Uncertainty,” in Book of Abstracts of the 12th Summer Workshop on Interval Methods (SWIM 2019), Palaiseau, France, Jul. 2019.

• R. Voges, B. Wagner, and V. Kreinovich, “Efficient Algorithms for Synchronizing Localization Sensors Under Interval Uncertainty,” Reliable Computing (Interval Computations), vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2020.

• R. Voges, B. Wagner, and V. Kreinovich, “Odometry under Interval Uncertainty: Towards Optimal Algorithms, with Potential Application to Self-Driving Cars and Mobile Robots,” Reliable Computing (Interval Computations), vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2020.

• R. Voges and B. Wagner, “Set-Membership Extrinsic Calibration of a 3D LiDAR and a Camera,” in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Las Vegas, NV, USA, Oct. 2020, accepted.

• R. Voges, “Bounded-Error Visual-LiDAR Odometry on Mobile Robots Under Consideration of Spatiotemporal Uncertainties,” PhD thesis, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität, 2020.

Lidar point cloud data with classifications – unclassified (1), ground (2), low vegetation (3), medium vegetation (4), high vegetation (5), buildings (6), low point - noise (7), reserved – model keypoint (8), high noise (18).

Detroit Street View (DSV) is an urban remote sensing program run by the Enterprise Geographic Information Systems (EGIS) Team within the Department of Innovation and Technology at the City of Detroit. The mission of Detroit Street View is ‘To continuously observe and document Detroit’s changing physical environment through remote sensing, resulting in freely available foundational data that empowers effective city operations, informed decision making, awareness, and innovation.’ LiDAR (as well as panoramic imagery) is collected using a vehicle-mounted mobile mapping system.

Due to variations in processing, index lines are not currently available for all existing LiDAR datasets, including all data collected before September 2020. Index lines represent the approximate path of the vehicle within the time extent of the given LiDAR file. The actual geographic extent of the LiDAR point cloud varies dependent on line-of-sight.

Compressed (LAZ format) point cloud files may be requested by emailing gis@detroitmi.gov with a description of the desired geographic area, any specific dates/file names, and an explanation of interest and/or intended use. Requests will be filled at the discretion and availability of the Enterprise GIS Team. Deliverable file size limitations may apply and requestors may be asked to provide their own online location or physical media for transfer.

LiDAR was collected using an uncalibrated Trimble MX2 mobile mapping system. The data is not quality controlled, and no accuracy assessment is provided or implied. Results are known to vary significantly. Users should exercise caution and conduct their own comprehensive suitability assessments before requesting and applying this data.

Sample Dataset: https://detroitmi.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=69853441d944442f9e79199b57f26fe3

A 6-in resolution 8-class land cover dataset derived from the 2017 Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data capture. This dataset was developed as part of an updated urban tree canopy assessment and therefore represents a ''top-down" mapping perspective in which tree canopy overhanging features is assigned to the tree canopy class. The eight land cover classes mapped were: (1) Tree Canopy, (2) Grass\Shrubs, (3) Bare Soil, (4) Water, (5) Buildings, (6) Roads, (7) Other Impervious, and (8) Railroads. The primary sources used to derive this land cover layer were 2017 LiDAR (1-ft post spacing) and 2016 4-band orthoimagery (0.5-ft resolution). Object based image analysis was used to automate land-cover features using LiDAR point clouds and derivatives, orthoimagery, and vector GIS datasets -- City Boundary (2017, NYC DoITT) Buildings (2017, NYC DoITT) Hydrography (2014, NYC DoITT) LiDAR Hydro Breaklines (2017, NYC DoITT) Transportation Structures (2014, NYC DoITT) Roadbed (2014, NYC DoITT) Road Centerlines (2014, NYC DoITT) Railroads (2014, NYC DoITT) Green Roofs (date unknown, NYC Parks) Parking Lots (2014, NYC DoITT) Parks (2016, NYC Parks) Sidewalks (2014, NYC DoITT) Synthetic Turf (2018, NYC Parks) Wetlands (2014, NYC Parks) Shoreline (2014, NYC DoITT) Plazas (2014, NYC DoITT) Utility Poles (2014, ConEdison via NYCEM) Athletic Facilities (2017, NYC Parks)

For the purposes of classification, only vegetation > 8 ft were classed as Tree Canopy. Vegetation below 8 ft was classed as Grass/Shrub.

To learn more about this dataset, visit the interactive "Understanding the 2017 New York City LiDAR Capture" Story Map -- https://maps.nyc.gov/lidar/2017/ Please see the following link for additional documentation on this dataset -- https://github.com/CityOfNewYork/nyc-geo-metadata/blob/master/Metadata/Metadata_LandCover.md

This dataset is Lidar data that has been collected by the Scottish public sector and made available under the Open Government Licence. The data are available as point cloud (LAS format or in LAZ compressed format), along with the derived Digital Terrain Model (DTM) and Digital Surface Model (DSM) products as Cloud optimized GeoTIFFs (COG) or standard GeoTIFF. The dataset contains multiple subsets of data which were each commissioned and flown in response to different organisational requirements. The details of each can be found at https://remotesensingdata.gov.scot/data#/list

This dataset is a footprint of the current available LiDAR data over for the State of Queensland compiled from numerous LiDAR projects captured on or after the year 2008.

This dataset provides maps of aboveground forest biomass (AGB) of living trees and standing dead trees in Mg/ha across portions of Northwestern United States, including Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Montana, at a spatial resolution of 30 m. Forest inventory data were compiled from 29 stakeholders that had overlapping lidar imagery. The collection totaled 3805 field plots with lidar imagery for 176 collections acquired between 2002 and 2016. Plot-level AGB estimates were calculated from tree measurements using the default allometric equations found in the Fire Fuels Extension (FFE) of the Forest Vegetation Simulator (FVS). The random forest algorithm was used to model AGB from lidar height and density metrics that were generated from the lidar returns within fixed-radius field plot footprints, gridded climate metrics obtained from the Climate-FVS Ready Data Server, and topographic estimates extracted from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) 1 Arc-Second Global elevation rasters. AGB was then mapped from the same lidar metrics gridded across the extent of the lidar collections at 30-m resolution. The standard deviation of estimated AGB of the terminal nodes from the random forest predictions was also mapped to show pixel-level model uncertainty. Note that the AGB estimates are, for the most part, a single snapshot in time and that the forest conditions are not necessarily representative of the larger study area.

High-resolution Lidar survey covers an area of 280 km² in the upper part of the Jemez River basin, New Mexico. The data collection was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and performed by the National Center for Airborne Laser Mapping (NCALM) during peak snowpack 2010 (March - April 2010). The dataset contains point cloud tiles in LAS format, 1 m Digital Surface Model (DSM) derived using first-stop points, 1 m Digital Elevation Model (DEM) derived using ground-class points and 1 m hill shade dataset derived from DEM. These datasets, together with the snow-off Lidar survey performed in Jun - July 2010, are being used to estimate snowpack, vegetation biomass and distribution, and bare earth elevations to help better understand and quantify ecosystem structure, geomorphology, and landscape processes within the Critical Zone Observatory.

Publications associated with this dataset can be found at NCALM's Data Tracking Center

This is a road lidar data collection for developing road elevation models and road inundation mapping methodologies, a joint work between ORNL and The University of Texas at Austin. This dataset is generated as part of the flood transportation infrastructure, partly funded by the NOAA CIROH project. ORNL is a project partner for high-performance computing-empowered flood inundation mapping methodology R&D. The dataset is computed using a GPU-accelerated lidar data processing workflow developed at ORNL. The lidar data source is from TxGIO, the state lidar data collection site. The output dataset is in two formats: laz and copc. It is organized by TxDOT's maintenance sections, covering the Austin District. Data size: 3.86 billion road lidar points, 1.67% of the entire lidar data input Projection: EPSG:32614 (WGS84/UTM zone 14N) Website: https://web.corral.tacc.utexas.edu/nfiedata/road3d/austin_district/AustinMaintenanceSections_H_epsg6343_V_epsg5703/ LICENSE FOR USE -- MAPS AND DATA DISCLAIMER This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ MAPS AND DATA DISCLAIMER The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described or information contained on this map or associated series of maps. The data and related map graphics are not legal, land survey or engineering documents and are not intended to be used as such. ORNL gives no warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, utility or completeness of this information. The user of these maps and data assumes all responsibility and risk for the use of the maps and data. ORNL disclaims all warranties, representations or endorsements either express or implied, with regard to the information contained in this map product, including, but not limited to, all implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose or non-infringement. This preliminary map product is for research and review purposes only. It is not intended to be used for emergency management operational or life safety decisions at the local or regional governmental level or by the general public. Users requiring information regarding hazardous conditions or meteorological conditions for specific geographic areas should consult directly with their city or county emergency management office.

During the Fall of 2016 AGRC and the Utah Geological Survey acquired ~205 square miles of 8 points per meter Quality Level 1 LiDAR of The Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) area around Milford, Utah in Beaver and Millard Counties in western Utah. The 0.5 meter resolution bare earth DEMs and first-return/highest-hit DSMs in .img format have a 10.0cm vertical RMSE accuracy and are available for download. The LAS classified point clouds are also available by request Rick Kelson from AGRC at RKelson@utah.gov or The National Map. This elevation data was collected between October 26 and November 3, 2016 and has a UTM NAD83 (2011) zone 12 north meter NAVD88(GEOID12) projection.

The LiDAR Index was created to illustrate the extents of LiDAR imagery and data currently Existing or In the Progress or Planned for the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER). Each area is delineated by a polygon with attributes denoting its general area coverage, status, file location, Contractor and availability of metadata. Exists various datasets with varying degrees of accuracy, coverage and access. DWER custodial datasets can be purchased by external entities by contacting the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation.

The lidar survey was conducted by vendor Earth Eye LLC, 3680 Avalon Park Blvd. The data were delivered in LAS 1.1 format with information on return number, easting, northing, elevation, scan angle, and intensity for each return. This project is the data acquisition phase of a administrative study being done in collaboration with the Nez Perce National Forest, Grangeville, ID; Forest Service Region 1 Regional Office, Missoula, MT (Forest Inventory and Analysis and Remote Sensing/ Geospatial Team); and Rocky Mountain Research Station - Forest Sciences Lab, Moscow, ID. The primary goal of the study is to provide operational implementation of Lidar technology in support of project level planning. The proposed applications of Lidar in support of planning are: vegetation structural modeling, erosion modeling, fuels, transportation planning, timber system planning, wildlife habitat modeling, and stream quality. The Rocky Mountain Research Station will provide the development of peer-reviewed forest structural metrics and technical support in implementation of Lidar technology. The technical specifications have been defined to specifically support vegetation modeling using Lidar data. The project area consists of one contiguous blocks totaling 17, 325 hectares in north central Idaho. The project area consists of moderately variable topographic configurations with diverse vegetation components. Clear Creek is a tributary of the Middle Fork Clearwater River located east of Kooskia, Idaho. Vegetation is variable, transitioning from low elevation shrubland and mixed conifers to upper elevation spruce-fir. Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) are the predominant species at lower to mid elevations occupying a fairly xeric setting transitioning to grand fir (Abies grandis) and western red cedar (Thuja plicata) at mid elevations and subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) at the higher elevations.

This record is for Approval for Access product AfA439. A habitat map derived from airborne data, specifically CASI (Compact Airborne Spectrographic Imager) and LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) data. The habitat map is a polygon shapefile showing site relevant habitat classes. Geographical coverage is incomplete because of limits in data available. It includes those areas where the Environment Agency, Natural England and the Regional Coastal Monitoring Programme have carried out sufficient aerial and ground surveys in England. The habitat map is derived from CASI multispectral data, LIDAR elevation data and other GIS products. The classification uses ground data from sites collected near to the time of CASI capture. We use ground data to identify the characteristics of the different habitats in the CASI and LIDAR data. These characteristics are then used to classify the remaining areas into one of the different habitats. Habitat maps generated by Geomatics are often derived using multiple data sources (e.g. CASI, LIDAR and OS-base mapping data), which may or may not have been captured coincidentally. In instances where datasets are not coincidentally captured there may be some errors brought about by seasonal, developmental or anthropological change in the habitat. The collection of ground data used in the classification has some limitations. It has not been collected at the same time as CASI or LIDAR capture; it is normally within a couple of months of CASI capture. Some variations between the CASI data and situation on site at the time of ground data collection are possible. A good spatial coverage of ground data around the site is recommended, although not always practically achievable. For a class to be mapped on site there must have been samples collected for it on site. If the class is not seen on site or samples are not collected for a class, it cannot be mapped. No quantitative accuracy assessment has been carried out on the habitat map, although the classification was trained using ground data and the final habitat map has been critically evaluated using Aerial Photography captured simultaneously with the CASI data by the processors and independently by habitat specialists. Please note that this content contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right [2014] and you must ensure that a similar attribution statement is contained in any sub-licences of the Information that you grant, together with a requirement that any further sub-licences do the same. Attribution statement: © Environment Agency copyright and/or database right 2015. All rights reserved.

LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) data of the City of Vancouver and UBC Endowment Lands with an Area of Interest (AOI) covering a total of 134 square kilometers.​Data products includes a classification that defines "bare earth" ground surface, water and of the upper most surface defined by vegetation cover, buildings and other structures.Data accessEach of the 181 polygons on the map or rows in the table provides corresponding link to the data in LAS format (zipped, file sizes range from 16.45MB to 2.74GB).AttributesPoint data was classified as:Unclassified;Bare-earth and low grass;Low vegetation (height <2m);High vegetation (height >2m);Water;Buildings;Other; andNoise (noise points, blunders, outliners, etc) Note​The 2022 LiDAR data is being utilized for initiatives including land management, planning, hazard assessment, (e.g. floods, landslides, lava flows, and tsunamis), urban forestry, storm drainage, and watershed analysis. Data currency​Aerial LiDAR was acquired on September 7th and September 9th, 2022 and is current as of those dates. Data accuracyThe LiDAR data is positioned with a mean density of approximately 49 points per square metreSidelap: minimum of 60% in north-south and east-west directionsVertical accuracy: 0.081 metre (95% confidence level)Coordinate system​The map of grid cells on this portal is in WGS 84 but the LiDAR data in the LAS files are in the following coordinate system:Projection: UTM Zone 10 (Central Meridian 123 West)Hz Datum: NAD 83 (CSRS) 4.0.0.BC.1.GVRDVertical Datum: CGVD28GVRDMetro Vancouver Geoid (HTMVBC00_Abbbyn.zip) Websites for further information City boundary dataset

Lidar was collected between November 01 2012 and November 07 2012 in the Northern Sierra Nevada Mountains of California. Data were collected by National Center for Airborne Laser Mapping (NCALM) for Dr. Qinghua Guo at the University of California, Merced Sierra Nevada Research Institute. This dataset covers roughly 437 km2

Lidar (light detection and ranging) imagery provides valuable information in the field of remote sensing, allowing users to determine elevation, vegetation structure, and terrain with remarkable levels of detail. This manual will lead ArcGIS Pro users through the tools and methods needed to access, process, and analyze lidar data through a series of step-by-step tutorials. By completing this series of tutorials, you will be able to: •Manipulate data to create maps and map templates in ArcGIS Pro •Obtain and display lidar imagery •Use ArcGIS Pro tools to process and analyze lidar data •Classify lidar points using different classification methods • Process lidar point clouds to create digital elevation models