Database created for replication of GeoStoryTelling. Our life stories evolve in specific and contextualized places. Although our homes may be our primarily shaping environment, our homes are themselves situated in neighborhoods that expose us to the immediate “real world” outside home. Indeed, the places where we are currently experiencing, and have experienced life, play a fundamental role in gaining a deeper and more nuanced understanding of our beliefs, fears, perceptions of the world, and even our prospects of social mobility. Despite the immediate impact of the places where we experience life in reaching a better understanding of our life stories, to date most qualitative and mixed methods researchers forego the analytic and elucidating power that geo-contextualizing our narratives bring to social and health research. From this view then, most research findings and conclusions may have been ignoring the spatial contexts that most likely have shaped the experiences of research participants. The main reason for the underuse of these geo-contextualized stories is the requirement of specialized training in geographical information systems and/or computer and statistical programming along with the absence of cost-free and user-friendly geo-visualization tools that may allow non-GIS experts to benefit from geo-contextualized outputs. To address this gap, we present GeoStoryTelling, an analytic framework and user-friendly, cost-free, multi-platform software that enables researchers to visualize their geo-contextualized data narratives. The use of this software (available in Mac and Windows operative systems) does not require users to learn GIS nor computer programming to obtain state-of-the-art, and visually appealing maps. In addition to providing a toy database to fully replicate the outputs presented, we detail the process that researchers need to follow to build their own databases without the need of specialized external software nor hardware. We show how the resulting HTML outputs are capable of integrating a variety of multi-media inputs (i.e., text, image, videos, sound recordings/music, and hyperlinks to other websites) to provide further context to the geo-located stories we are sharing (example https://cutt.ly/k7X9tfN). Accordingly, the goals of this paper are to describe the components of the methodology, the steps to construct the database, and to provide unrestricted access to the software tool, along with a toy dataset so that researchers may interact first-hand with GeoStoryTelling and fully replicate the outputs discussed herein. Since GeoStoryTelling relied on OpenStreetMap its applications may be used worldwide, thus strengthening its potential reach to the mixed methods and qualitative scientific communities, regardless of location around the world. Keywords: Geographical Information Systems; Interactive Visualizations; Data StoryTelling; Mixed Methods & Qualitative Research Methodologies; Spatial Data Science; Geo-Computation.

The files linked to this reference are the geospatial data created as part of the completion of the baseline vegetation inventory project for the NPS park unit. Current format is ArcGIS file geodatabase but older formats may exist as shapefiles. Spatial data from field observation points and quantitative plots were used to edit the formation-level maps of Richmond National Battlefield Park to better reflect vegetation classes. Using ArcView 3.3, polygon boundaries were revised onscreen over leaf-off photography. Units used to label polygons on the map (i.e. map classes) are equivalent to one or more vegetation classes from the regional vegetation classification, or to a land-use class from the Anderson Level II classification system. Each polygon on the Richmond National Battlefield Park map was assigned to one of twenty-one map classes based on plot data, field observations, aerial photography signatures, and topographic maps. The mapping boundary was based on park boundary data obtained from Richmond National Battlefield Park in June 2004.

The thesis the data comes from analyses patterns of growth, decline, clustering and dispersal of live music in Sydney and Melbourne between the 1980s and 2000s. It demonstrates the use of historical Geographic Information Systems, combined with interviews, as a methodological approach for understanding the impacts of restructuring in cultural industries. It offers a practical example of applied social research with GIS.

The project developed a novel methodology combining GIS with interviews with music scene participants. A substantial part of the research project comprised the development of a historical geodatabase, leveraging the spatial and temporal data embedded in historical live music performance listings (‘gig listings’) sourced from archived publications in Sydney and Melbourne. This geodatabase ultimately incorporates over 20,000 live music listings and over 2500 geocoded venues.

The historical geodatabase was built incrementally to adapt to the format of the historical data. The structure maintains a one-to-one relationship to primary sources from different publications, allowing for quality checks, but can produce normalised outputs that allow live music venues, performances, and bands to be analysed separately. Outputs from the geodatabase have facilitated the quantitative analysis and geovisualisation of live music data over the study time frame in Sydney and Melbourne.

Data represent information extracted from published literature meeting filtering criteria regarding quantification of among-individual variation in spatial behaviors. Information includes manuscript identifiers, descriptions of study design, as well as information directly input into a statistical meta-analysis regression framework.

Excel spreadsheet which only contains numeric data from a set of confusion matrices (one sheet per matrix).It is the same quantitative data stored in a field of a table in the database. Only is provided as a complement to the database in order to access to the quantitative data in a more convenient format.

The files linked to this reference are the geospatial data created as part of the completion of the baseline vegetation inventory project for the NPS park unit. Current format is ArcGIS file geodatabase but older formats may exist as shapefiles. Spatial data from observation points and quantitative plots were used to edit the formation-level maps of George Washington Birthplace National Monument to better reflect homogeneous vegetation classes. Using Arcview 3.3, polygon boundaries were revised onscreen over leaf-off photography. Units used to label polygons on the map (i.e. map classes) are equivalent to one or more vegetation classes from the regional vegetation classification, or to a land-use class from the Anderson Level II classification system. Each polygon on the George Washington Birthplace National Monument map was assigned to one of 19 map classes based on plot data, field observations, aerial photography signatures, and topographic maps.

This dataset provides the raw anonymised (quantitative) data from the EDSA demand analysis. This data has been gathered from surveys performed with those who identify as data scientists and manages of data scientists in different sectors across Europe. The coverage of the data includes level of current expertise of the individual or team (data scientist and manager respectively) in eight key areas. The dataset also includes the importance of the eight key areas as capabilities of a data scientist. Further the dataset includes a breakdown of key tools, technologies and training delivery methods required to enhance the skill set of data scientists across Europe. The EDSA dashboard provides an interactive view of this dataset and demonstrates how it is being used within the project. The dataset forms part of the European Data Science Academy (EDSA) project which received funding from the European Unions's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 643937. This three year project ran/runs from February 2015 to January 2018. Important note on privacy: This dataset has been collected and made available in a pseudo anonymous way, as agreed by participants. This means that while each record represents a person, no sensitive identifiable information, such as name, email or affiliation is available (we don't even collect it). Pseudo anonymisation is never full proof, however the projects privacy impact assessment has concluded that the risk resulting from the de-anonymisation of the data is extremely low. It should be noted that data is not included of participants who did not explicitly agree that it could be shared pseudo anonymously (this was due to a change of terms after the survey had started gathering responses, meaning any early responses had come from people who didn't see this clause). If you have any concerns please contact the data publisher via the links below.

ResourcesMapTeacher guide Student worksheetVocabulary and puzzlesSelf-check questionsGet startedOpen the map.Use the teacher guide to explore the map with your class or have students work through it on their own with the worksheet.New to GeoInquiriesTM? See Getting to Know GeoInquiries.AP skills & objectives (CED)Skill 3D: Compare patterns and trends in maps and in quantitative and geospatial data to draw conclusions.IMP-1.C: Explain the geographical effects of decisions made using geographical information.PSO-1.B: Explain how major geographic concepts illustrate spatial relationships.Learning outcomesStudents will be able to identify and explain the spatial hierarchy of major chain stores in Houston, Texas.Students will be able to analyze the range and market areas for coffee shops, fast food restaurants, home improvement stores, and luxury department stores.

• A dataset called GEOICS (georeferenced individual cocaine seizures) with 44 variables and 939 records with geospatial attributes and quantitative and qualitative data related to individual cocaine seizures (ICS) in Brazil - 2022.
• Dataset with geographic coordinates of clandestine airstrips in the Amazon region.
• Python code.

Understanding the characteristics of the rapidly evolving geospatial software ecosystem in the United States is critical to enable convergence research and education that are dependent on geospatial data and software. This paper describes a survey approach to better understand geospatial use cases, software and tools, and limitations encountered while using and developing geospatial software. The survey was broadcast through a variety of geospatial-related academic mailing lists and listservs. We report both quantitative responses and qualitative insights. As 42% of respondents indicated that they viewed their work as limited by inadequacies in geospatial software, ample room for improvement exists. In general, respondents expressed concerns about steep learning curves and insufficient time for mastering geospatial software, and often limited access to high-performance computing resources. If adequate efforts were taken to resolve software limitations, respondents believed they would be able to better handle big data, cover broader study areas, integrate more types of data, and pursue new research. Insights gained from this survey play an important role in supporting the conceptualization of a national geospatial software institute in the United States with the aim to drastically advance the geospatial software ecosystem to enable broad and significant research and education advances.

The files linked to this reference are the geospatial data created as part of the completion of the baseline vegetation inventory project for the NPS park unit. Current format is ArcGIS file geodatabase but older formats may exist as shapefiles. Spatial data from field observation points and quantitative plots were used to edit the formation-level maps of Petersburg National Battlefield to better reflect vegetation classes. Using ArcView 3.3, polygon boundaries were revised onscreen over leaf-off photography. Units used to label polygons on the map (i.e. map classes) are equivalent to one or more vegetation classes from the regional vegetation classification, or to a land-use class from the Anderson (Anderson et al. 1976) Level II classification system. Each polygon on the Petersburg National Battlefield map was assigned to one of twenty map classes based on plot data, field observations, aerial photography signatures, and topographic maps. The mapping boundary was based on park boundary data obtained from Petersburg National Battlefield in May 2006. Spatial data depicting the locations of earthworks was obtained from the park and used to identify polygons of the cultural map classes Open Earthworks and Forested Earthworks. One map class used to attribute polygons combines two similar associations that, in some circumstances, are difficult to distinguish in the field. The vegetation map was clipped at the park boundary because areas outside the park were not surveyed or included in the accuracy assessment. Twenty map classes were used in the vegetation map for Petersburg National Battlefield. Map classes are equivalent to one or more vegetation classes from the regional vegetation classification, or to a land-use class from the Anderson (Anderson et al. 1976) Level II classification system.

This webinar will introduce the project on "the Workbook for Quantitative Methods and Socioconomic Application in GIS", and how to join the spatial data lab on those ongoing spacial social science research and development projects.

ResourcesMapTeacher guide Student worksheetVocabulary and puzzlesSelf-check questionsGet startedOpen the map.Use the teacher guide to explore the map with your class or have students work through it on their own with the worksheet.New to GeoInquiriesTM? See Getting to Know GeoInquiries.AP skills & objectives (CED)Skill 6.A: Identify the scales of analysis presented by maps, quantitative and geospatial data, images, and landscapes.PSO-2.C: Explain how population distribution and density affect society and the environment.PSO-2.F: Explain ways that geographers depict and analyze population composition.Learning outcomesStudents will be able to identify U.S. population data and certain spatial patterns.

A dataset that explores Green Card sponsorship trends, salary data, and employer insights for international studies with emphasis in quantitative spatial data analysis in the U.S.

This research is framed in the area of biomathematics and contributes to the epidemiological surveillance entities in Colombia to clarify how breast cancer mortality rate (BCM) is spatially distributed in relation to the forest area index (FA) and circulating vehicle index (CV). In this regard, the World Health Organization has highlighted the scarce generation of knowledge that relates mortality from tumor diseases to environmental factors. Quantitative methods based on geospatial data science are used with cross-sectional information from the 2018 census; it’s found that the BCM in Colombia is not spatially randomly distributed, but follows cluster aggregation patterns. Under multivariate modeling methods, the research provides sufficient statistical evidence in terms of not rejecting the hypothesis that if a spatial unit has high FA and low CV, then it has significant advantages in terms of lower BCM.

Resilience—the keen ability of people to adapt to changing physical environments—is essential in today's world of unexpected changes.Resilient Communities across Geographies edited by Sheila Lakshmi Steinberg and Steven J. Steinberg focuses on how applying GIS to environmental and socio-economic challenges for analysis and planning helps make communities more resilient.A hybrid of theory and action, Resilient Communities across Geographies uses an interdisciplinary approach to explore resilience studied by experts in geography, social sciences, planning, landscape architecture, urban and rural sociology, economics, migration, community development, meteorology, oceanography, and other fields. Geographies covered include urban and rural, coastal and mountainous, indigenous areas in the United State and Australia, and more. Geographical Information Systems (GIS) is the unifying tool that helped researchers understand resilience.This book shows how GIS:integrates quantitative, qualitative, and spatial data to produce a holistic view of a need for resilience.serves as a valuable tool to capture and integrate knowledge of local people, places, and resources.allows us to visualize data clearly as portrayed in a real-time map or spatial dashboard, thus leading to opportunities to make decisions.lets us see patterns and communicate what the data means.helps us see what resources they have and where they are located.provides a big vision for action by layering valuable pieces of information together to see where gaps are located, where action is needed, or how policies can be instituted to manage and improve community resilience.Resilience is not only an ideal; it is something that people and communities can actively work to achieve through intelligent planning and assessment. The stories shared by the contributing authors in Resilient Communities across Geographies help readers to develop an expanded sense of the power of GIS to address the difficult problems we collectively face in an ever-changing world.AUDIENCEProfessional and scholarly. Higher education.AUTHOR BIOSSheila Lakshmi Steinberg is a professor of Social and Environmental Sciences at Brandman University and Chair of the GIS Committee, where she leads the university to incorporate GIS across the curriculum. Her research interests include interdisciplinary research methods, culture, community, environmental sociology, geospatial approaches, ethnicity, health policy, and teaching pedagogy.Steven J. Steinberg is the Geographic Information Officer for the County of Los Angeles, California. Throughout his career, he has taught GIS as a professor of geospatial sciences for the California State University and, since 2011, has worked as a geospatial scientist in the public sector, applying GIS across a wide range of both environmental and human contexts.Pub Date: Print: 11/24/2020 Digital: 10/27/2020ISBN: Print: 9781589484818 Digital: 9781589484825Price: Print: $49.99 USD Digital: $49.99 USDPages: 350 Trim: 7.5 x 9.25 in.Table of ContentsPrefaceChapter 1. Conceptualizing spatial resilience Dr. Sheila Steinberg and Dr Steven J. SteinbergChapter 2. Resilience in coastal regions: the case of Georgia, USAChapter 3. Building resilient regions: Spatial analysis as a tool for ecosystem-based climate adaptationChapter 4. The mouth of the Columbia River: USACE, GIS and resilience in a dynamic coastal systemChapter 5. Urban resilience: Neighborhood complexity and the importance of social connectivityChapter 6. Mapping Indigenous LAChapter 7. Indigenous Martu knowledge: Mapping place through song and storyChapter 8. Developing resiliency through place-based inquiry in CanadaChapter 9. Engaging Youth in Spatial Modes of Thought toward Social and Environmental ResilienceChapter 10. Health, Place, and Space: Public Participation GIS for Rural Community PowerChapter 11. Best Practices for Using Local KnowledgeContributorsIndex

ResourcesMapTeacher guide Student worksheetVocabulary and puzzlesSelf-check questionsGet startedOpen the map.Use the teacher guide to explore the map with your class or have students work through it on their own with the worksheet.New to GeoInquiriesTM? See Getting to Know GeoInquiries.AP skills & objectives (CED)Skill 3.B: Describe spatial patterns presented in maps and in quantitative and geospatial data.PSO-2.A: Identify the factors that influence the distribution of human populations at different scales.SPS-2A: Explain the intent and effects of various population and immigration policies on population size and composition.Learning outcomesStudents will be able to visualize and analyze variations in the time-space compression.

The files linked to this reference are the geospatial data created as part of the completion of the baseline vegetation inventory project for the NPS park unit. Current format is ArcGIS file geodatabase but older formats may exist as shapefiles. The project team also developed a spatial vegetation map database representing MEVE, with three different map-class schemas: base, group, and management map classes. The base map classes represent the finest level of spatial detail. Initial polygons were developed using Definiens Professional (at the time of our use, this software was called eCognition), assisted by interpretation of 1:12,000 true-color digital orthophoto quarter quadrangles (DOQQs). These polygons (base map classes) were labeled using manual photo interpretation of the DOQQs and 1:12,000 true-color aerial photography. Field visits verified interpretation concepts. The vegetation map database includes 46 base map classes, which consist of associations, alliances, and park specials classified with quantitative analysis, additional associations and park specials noted during photointerpretation, and non-vegetated land cover, such as infrastructure, land use, and geological land cover. The base map classes consist of 5,007 polygons in the project area. A field-based accuracy assessment of the base map classes showed overall accuracy to be 43.5%. Seven map classes comprise 89.1% of the park vegetated land cover.

The nuclei of higher eukaryotic cells display compartmentalization and certain nuclear compartments have been shown to follow a degree of spatial organization. To date, the study of nuclear organization has often involved simple quantitative procedures that struggle with both the irregularity of the nuclear boundary and the problem of handling replicate images. Such studies typically focus on inter-object distance, rather than spatial location within the nucleus. The concern of this paper is the spatial preference of nuclear compartments, for which we have developed statistical tools to quantitatively study and explore nuclear organization. These tools combine replicate images to generate ‘aggregate maps' which represent the spatial preferences of nuclear compartments. We present two examples of different compartments in mammalian fibroblasts (WI-38 and MRC-5) that demonstrate new knowledge of spatial preference within the cell nucleus. Specifically, the spatial preference of RNA polyme...

This study mapped twelve wetland plant communities (or “alliances”) and 59 subcommunities (or “community elements”) in 252 ha (623 A) of tidal and formerly tidal wetlands within the Siletz estuary. The target shapefile polygon size for the GIS mapping project was 0.8 to 2 ha (1 to 5 A). Within the study area, plant communities (as generally defined by estuarine ecologists) tended to occupy larger areas (over 2 ha). Therefore, each polygon was assigned both to a plant community, and to a smaller, more closely defined "subcommunity" that was characterized by a particular group of dominant plant species. The average size of a polygon (subcommunity) on the final map was about 1.5 ha (3.7 A), but about a third of the polygons were under 0.8 ha (2 A) in size. When using the plant community maps provided in this report, it is important to remember that the community descriptions are based on plant community composition as viewed from onsite, within the community. The visual impression of a plant community may be quite different from offsite (for example, from a nearby road) (see Visually dominant species below). Onsite investigation of each plant community is recommended when reviewing plant communities described in this report or when conducting more detailed analyses. The mapping provided in this report is intended for two main uses: preliminary planning (for instance, as an aid to restoration project planning); and environmental stratification for detailed quantitative sampling (see Stratification recommendations below). The mapping provided is not appropriate for regulatory purposes or for quantitative analysis of vegetation change