95 datasets found
  1. D

    Command And Data Handling Market Research Report 2033

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Sep 30, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2025). Command And Data Handling Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/command-and-data-handling-market
    Explore at:
    csv, pptx, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 30, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Command and Data Handling Market Outlook



    According to our latest research, the global command and data handling (C&DH) market size is valued at USD 3.2 billion in 2024, demonstrating robust momentum driven by the increasing deployment of satellites and sophisticated space missions. The market is forecasted to reach USD 6.8 billion by 2033, expanding at a healthy CAGR of 8.7% during the period from 2025 to 2033. This impressive growth is primarily fueled by the rising demand for advanced satellite-based services, increased governmental investments in space exploration, and the proliferation of private sector participation in space activities. As per our latest research, the command and data handling market is poised for significant transformation, underpinned by technological advancements and the surging necessity for real-time data management in both commercial and defense space applications.




    The growth trajectory of the command and data handling market is strongly influenced by the escalating number of satellite launches and the need for reliable, high-performance onboard data processing systems. The rapid expansion of satellite constellations for communication, navigation, and Earth observation has necessitated the development of more sophisticated C&DH subsystems. These subsystems are crucial for managing mission-critical operations, including telemetry, tracking, and command functions, as well as handling vast volumes of scientific and operational data. As satellite missions become more complex and multi-faceted, the demand for advanced C&DH solutions capable of supporting autonomous operations and resilient data handling is expected to surge, further propelling market growth.




    Another significant driver for the command and data handling market is the increasing adoption of miniaturized and modular C&DH solutions, especially for small satellites and CubeSats. The trend towards miniaturization has enabled a broader range of organizations, including academic institutions and emerging private players, to participate in space missions at a lower cost. This democratization of access to space has resulted in a burgeoning demand for scalable, cost-effective, and highly reliable C&DH systems. Additionally, advancements in software-defined architectures and real-time data analytics are enhancing the flexibility and efficiency of C&DH systems, making them more adaptable to evolving mission requirements and operational environments.




    The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies into C&DH systems is another pivotal factor shaping the market’s future. AI and ML algorithms are enabling autonomous decision-making and predictive maintenance for spacecraft, thereby reducing the reliance on ground control and improving mission success rates. The incorporation of these advanced technologies is also facilitating enhanced onboard data processing, anomaly detection, and fault management, which are critical for long-duration deep space missions. As space agencies and commercial entities continue to push the boundaries of space exploration, the role of intelligent C&DH systems will become increasingly central to mission planning, execution, and data exploitation.




    From a regional perspective, North America continues to dominate the command and data handling market, owing to its mature space industry, substantial government funding, and the presence of leading aerospace companies. However, significant growth is also being observed in regions such as Asia Pacific and Europe, where increasing investments in indigenous space programs and the emergence of new commercial satellite operators are driving demand for advanced C&DH solutions. The competitive landscape is further intensified by the entry of innovative startups and technology firms, particularly in countries like India, China, and Japan, which are rapidly expanding their capabilities in space technology development and deployment.



    Component Analysis



    The command and data handling market by component is segmented into hardware, software, and services, each playing a vital role in the overall performance and reliability of space missions. Hardware remains the backbone of the C&DH system, encompassing processors, memory units, data buses, and telemetry interfaces. These components are engineered to withstand the harsh conditions of space, including radiation, extreme temperatures, and mechanical

  2. F

    GRACE-A and GRACE-B Level 1B, Level 1B combined and Level 2 Data Products

    • fedeo.ceos.org
    • access.uat.earthdata.nasa.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Jul 17, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    ESA/ESRIN (2019). GRACE-A and GRACE-B Level 1B, Level 1B combined and Level 2 Data Products [Dataset]. https://fedeo.ceos.org/collections/series/items/GRACE-A.and.GRACE-B.Level1B.Level1Bcombined.Level2?httpAccept=text/html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 17, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    ESA/ESRIN
    Time period covered
    Apr 1, 2002 - Oct 27, 2017
    Variables measured
    EARTH SCIENCE>AGRICULTURE>SOILS>SOIL MOISTURE/WATER CONTENT
    Measurement technique
    Laser Ranging, GRACE ACC, Accelerometers, Radar Altimeters, GRACE SCA, GRACE LRR, Interferometers, Cameras, GRACE INTERFEROMETER
    Description

    Level-1A Data Products are the result of a non-destructive processing applied to the Level-0 data at NASA/JPL. The sensor calibration factors are applied in order to convert the binary encoded measurements to engineering units. Where necessary, time tag integer second ambiguity is resolved and data are time tagged to the respective satellite receiver clock time. Editing and quality control flags are added, and the data is reformatted for further processing. The Level-1A data are reversible to Level-0, except for the bad data packets. This level also includes the ancillary data products needed for processing to the next data level. The Level-1B Data Products are the result of a possibly destructive, or irreversible, processing applied to both the Level-1A and Level-0 data at NASA/JPL. The data are correctly time-tagged, and data sample rate is reduced from the higher rates of the previous levels. Collectively, the processing from Level-0 to Level-1B is called the Level-1 Processing. This level also includes the ancillary data products generated during this processing, and the additional data needed for further processing. The Level-2 data products include the static and time-variable (monthly) gravity field and related data products derived from the application of Level-2 processing at GFZ, UTCSR and JPL to the previous level data products. This level also includes the ancillary data products such as GFZ's Level-1B short-term atmosphere and ocean de-aliasing product (AOD1B) generated during this processing. GRACE-A and GRACE-B Level-1B Data Product • Satellite clock solution [GA-OG-1B-CLKDAT, GB-OG-1B-CLKDAT, GRACE CLKDAT]: Offset of the satellite receiver clock relative to GPS time, obtained by linear fit to raw on-board clock offset estimates. • GPS flight data [GA-OG-1B-GPSDAT, GB-OG-1B-GPSDAT, GRACE GPSDAT]: Preprocessed and calibrated GPS code and phase tracking data edited and decimated from instrument high-rate (10 s (code) or 1 s (phase)) to low-rate (10 s) samples for science use (1 file per day, level-1 format) • Accelerometer Housekeeping data [GA-OG-1B-ACCHKP, GB-OG-1B-ACCHKP, GRACE ACCHKP]: Accelerometer proof-mass bias voltages, capacitive sensor outputs, instrument control unit (ICU) and sensor unit (SU) temperatures, reference voltages, primary and secondary power supply voltages (1 file per day, level-1 format). • Accelerometer data [GA-OG-1B-ACCDAT, GB-OG-1B-ACCDAT, GRACE ACCDAT]: Preprocessed and calibrated Level-1B accelerometer data edited and decimated from instrument high-rate (0.1 s) to low-rate (1s) samples for science use (1 file per day, level-1 format). • Intermediate clock solution [GA-OG-1B-INTCLK, GB-OG-1B-INTCLK, GRACE INTCLK]: derived with GIPSY POD software (300 s sample rate) (1 file per day, GIPSY format) • Instrument processing unit (IPU) Housekeeping data [GA-OG-1B-IPUHKP, GB-OG-1B-IPUHKP, GRACE IPUHKP]: edited and decimated from high-rate (TBD s) to low-rate (TBD s) samples for science use (1 file per day, level-1 format) • Spacecraft Mass Housekeeping data [GA-OG-1B-MASDAT, GB-OG-1B-MASDAT, GRACE MASDAT]: Level 1B Data as a function of time • GPS navigation solution data [GA-OG-1B-NAVSOL, GB-OG-1B-NAVSOL, GRACE NAVSOL]: edited and decimated from instrument high-rate (60 s) to low-rate (30 s) samples for science use (1 file per day, level-1 format) • OBDH time mapping to GPS time Housekeeping data [GA-OG-1B-OBDHTM, GB-OG-1B-OBDHTM, GRACE OBDHTM]: On-board data handling (OBDH) time mapping data (OBDH time to receiver time • Star camera data [GA-OG-1B-SCAATT, GB-OG-1B-SCAATT, GRACE SCAATT]: Preprocessed and calibrated star camera quaternion data edited and decimated from instrument high-rate (1 s) to low-rate (5 s) samples for science use (1 file per day, level-1 format) • Thruster activation Housekeeping data [GA-OG-1B-THRDAT, GB-OG-1B-THRDAT, GRACE THRDAT]: GN2 thruster data used for attitude (10 mN) and orbit (40 mN) control • GN2 tank temperature and pressure Housekeeping data [GA-OG-1B-TNKDAT, GB-OG-1B-TNKDAT, GRACE TNKDAT]: GN2 tank temperature and pressure data • Oscillator frequency data [GA-OG-1B-USODAT, GB-OG-1B-USODAT, GRACE USODAT]: derived from POD productGRACE-A and GRACE-B Combined Level-1B Data Product • Preprocessed and calibrated k-band ranging data [GA-OG-1B-KBRDAT, GB-OG-1B-KBRDAT, GRACE KBRDAT]: range, range-rate and range-acceleration data edited and decimated from instrument high-rate (0.1 s) to low-rate (5 s) samples for science use (1 file per day, level-1 format) • Atmosphere and Ocean De-aliasing Product [GA-OG-1B-ATMOCN, GB-OG-1B-ATMOCN, GRACE ATMOCN]: GRACE Atmosphere and Ocean De-aliasing Product GRACE Level-2 Data Product • GAC [GA-OG-_2-GAC, GB-OG-_2-GAC, GRACE GAC]: Combination of non-tidal atmosphere and ocean spherical harmonic coefficients provided as average over certain time span (same as corresponding GSM product) based on level-1 AOD1B product (1file per time span, level-2 format) • GCM [GA-OG-_2-GCM, GB-OG-_2-GCM, GRACE GCM]: Spherical harmonic coefficients and standard deviations of the long-term static gravity field estimated by combination of GRACE satellite instrument data and other information for a dedicated time span (multiple years) and spatial resolution (1 file per time span, level-2 format) • GAB [GA-OG-_2-GAB, GB-OG-_2-GAB, GRACE GAB]: Non-tidal ocean spherical harmonic coefficients provided as average over certain time span (same as corresponding GSM product) based on level-1 AOD1B product (1file per time span, level-2 format) • GAD [GA-OG-_2-GAD, GB-OG-_2-GAD, GRACE GAD]: bottom pressure product - combination of surface pressure and ocean (over the oceans, and zero over land). Spherical harmonic coefficients provided as average over certain time span (same as corresponding GSM product) based on level-1 AOD1B product (1file per time span, level-2 format) • GSM [GA-OG-_2-GSM, GB-OG-_2-GSM, GRACE GSM]: Spherical harmonic coefficients and standard deviations of the static gravity field estimated from GRACE satellite instrument data only for a dedicated time span (e.g. weekly, monthly, multiple years) and spatial resolution (1 file per time span, level-2 format).

  3. Z

    Quantitative Assessment of Research Data Management Practices - 2023

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • data-staging.niaid.nih.gov
    Updated Feb 17, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Varrato, Francesco; Felder, Fabian; Hoffmann, Katharina; Foerster, Christian; Subotic, Daniela; Eberle, Marisa; Schmid, Fabian; Gabella, Chiara (2025). Quantitative Assessment of Research Data Management Practices - 2023 [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_13836947
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 17, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
    ETH Zurich
    École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
    FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts
    Swiss National Data and Service Center for the Humanities
    Authors
    Varrato, Francesco; Felder, Fabian; Hoffmann, Katharina; Foerster, Christian; Subotic, Daniela; Eberle, Marisa; Schmid, Fabian; Gabella, Chiara
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This survey investigates Research Data Management (RDM) practices across five Swiss higher education institutions, including EPFL, ETH Zürich, Eawag, FHNW, and DaSCH, with the goal of gathering insights into how researchers manage data and code throughout the lifecycle of their projects, as well as using such findings to inform academic services related to RDM for researchers. Previous surveys, conducted at EPFL in 2017, 2019, and 2021, primarily focused on the planning and publishing stages of the research data lifecycle, such as data management planning and open data dissemination. The 2023 edition expanded to other institutes and places a stronger emphasis on Active Data Management, particularly during research projects, including a range of topics such as:

    Storage and backup solutions

    Data and code sharing platforms

    Documentation and metadata usage

    Compliance with legal and ethical standards

    Long-term data preservation strategies

    Use of open formats and open-source software

    Adoption of Data Management Plans (DMPs)

    This dataset was collected using the SurveyHero platform in compliance with GDPR and Swiss FADP regulations. enuvo GmbH acted as the data processor under a signed Data Processing Agreement. No personal identifiable information was purposefully collected, and data has been aggregated to further ensure respondents’ privacy.

    Included in this dataset:

    A CSV and XLSX file with the aggregated, anonymized data from the survey.

    Two PDF files containing graphical representations of the survey results, automatically generated by the SurveyHero platform in portrait and landscape mode.

    A README file providing context.

    This dataset is made openly available under the CC-BY 4.0 license. Users are encouraged to reuse it with appropriate attribution.

  4. Range: Unit Allotment

    • catalog.data.gov
    • usfs-test-dcdev.hub.arcgis.com
    • +3more
    Updated Sep 2, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Forest Service (2025). Range: Unit Allotment [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/range-unit-allotment-f803b
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 2, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Servicehttp://fs.fed.us/
    Description

    Pasture is a feature class in the Rangeland Management data set. It represents the area boundaries of livestock grazing pastures. The area corresponds to tabular data in the RIMS (Rangeland Information Management System).

  5. D

    Data Quality Tools Report

    • datainsightsmarket.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Jul 11, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Data Insights Market (2025). Data Quality Tools Report [Dataset]. https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/reports/data-quality-tools-1956054
    Explore at:
    ppt, doc, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 11, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Data Insights Market
    License

    https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The Data Quality Tools market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing volume and complexity of data generated across various industries. The expanding adoption of cloud-based solutions, coupled with stringent data regulations like GDPR and CCPA, are key catalysts. Businesses are increasingly recognizing the critical need for accurate, consistent, and reliable data to support strategic decision-making, improve operational efficiency, and enhance customer experiences. This has led to significant investment in data quality tools capable of addressing data cleansing, profiling, and monitoring needs. The market is fragmented, with several established players such as Informatica, IBM, and SAS competing alongside emerging agile companies. The competitive landscape is characterized by continuous innovation, with vendors focusing on enhancing capabilities like AI-powered data quality assessment, automated data remediation, and improved integration with existing data ecosystems. We project a healthy Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) for the market, driven by the ongoing digital transformation across industries and the growing demand for advanced analytics powered by high-quality data. This growth is expected to continue throughout the forecast period. The market segmentation reveals a diverse range of applications, including data integration, master data management, and data governance. Different industry verticals, including finance, healthcare, and retail, exhibit varying levels of adoption and investment based on their unique data management challenges and regulatory requirements. Geographic variations in market penetration reflect differences in digital maturity, regulatory landscapes, and economic conditions. While North America and Europe currently dominate the market, significant growth opportunities exist in emerging markets as digital infrastructure and data literacy improve. Challenges for market participants include the need to deliver comprehensive, user-friendly solutions that address the specific needs of various industries and data volumes, coupled with the pressure to maintain competitive pricing and innovation in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.

  6. D

    Drone Data Management Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Jan 7, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2025). Drone Data Management Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/global-drone-data-management-market
    Explore at:
    pptx, pdf, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 7, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Drone Data Management Market Outlook



    The global drone data management market size is poised to grow significantly, with estimations projecting a rise from $1.5 billion in 2023 to approximately $10.2 billion by 2032, reflecting a robust CAGR of 24.5%. This impressive growth can be attributed to the increasing adoption of drones across various industries for data collection and analysis, underscoring their transformative impact on operational efficiency and decision-making processes.



    One of the primary growth factors driving the drone data management market is the rapid advancement in drone technology. The integration of sophisticated sensors, high-resolution cameras, and advanced navigation systems has significantly enhanced the capabilities of drones, making them indispensable tools for data acquisition in sectors such as agriculture, construction, and environmental monitoring. Additionally, the advent of machine learning algorithms and artificial intelligence has further amplified the utility of drones, enabling more accurate data analysis and predictive insights.



    Another key driver of market growth is the rising demand for real-time data analytics. In today's fast-paced world, industries are increasingly relying on timely and precise data to make informed decisions. Drones, equipped with state-of-the-art data management software, can provide real-time analytics, which is crucial for applications such as disaster management, precision farming, and infrastructure inspection. This capability not only enhances operational efficiency but also reduces costs associated with manual data collection and analysis.



    The growing focus on sustainability and environmental conservation is also propelling the drone data management market. Drones are being extensively used for environmental monitoring, helping to track changes in ecosystems, wildlife populations, and natural resources. By providing accurate and comprehensive data, drones enable researchers and policymakers to devise effective conservation strategies. Additionally, the use of drones in sectors like agriculture and utilities contributes to more sustainable practices by optimizing resource use and minimizing environmental impact.



    The concept of Drones As A Service (DaaS) is gaining traction as businesses seek to leverage drone technology without the burden of ownership and maintenance. This model allows companies to access the latest drone technologies and services on a subscription basis, enabling them to focus on their core operations while benefiting from the data and insights provided by drones. DaaS providers offer a range of services, from data collection and analysis to drone operation and maintenance, catering to the specific needs of different industries. This approach not only reduces the upfront costs associated with drone acquisition but also ensures that businesses have access to the most advanced and up-to-date drone technologies. As a result, DaaS is becoming an attractive option for organizations looking to integrate drone technology into their operations efficiently and cost-effectively.



    Regionally, North America dominates the drone data management market, driven by the presence of leading technology companies and substantial investments in research and development. The region's robust regulatory framework and widespread adoption of drones across various sectors further contribute to its market leadership. However, the Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the highest growth rate, owing to the increasing adoption of drones in agriculture, construction, and infrastructure development. Countries like China and India are investing heavily in drone technology to enhance productivity and address various socio-economic challenges.



    Component Analysis



    The drone data management market is segmented into software, hardware, and services, each playing a crucial role in the ecosystem. The software segment encompasses a wide range of applications, including data processing, analysis, and visualization tools. These software solutions are essential for transforming raw data collected by drones into actionable insights. With the continuous advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning, software solutions are becoming more sophisticated, providing users with predictive analytics and real-time decision-making capabilities. Companies are increasingly investing in developing custom software solutions tailored to specific industry needs, further driving growth in this segment

  7. H

    LNWB Ch03 Data Processes - data management plan

    • hydroshare.org
    • search.dataone.org
    zip
    Updated Aug 19, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Christina Bandaragoda; Bracken Capen; Joanne Greenberg; Mary Dumas; Peter Gill (2016). LNWB Ch03 Data Processes - data management plan [Dataset]. https://www.hydroshare.org/resource/7ccd68835ff14c1d856c704591c77a8a
    Explore at:
    zip(4.5 MB)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 19, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    HydroShare
    Authors
    Christina Bandaragoda; Bracken Capen; Joanne Greenberg; Mary Dumas; Peter Gill
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Overview: The Lower Nooksack Water Budget Project involved assembling a wide range of existing data related to WRIA 1 and specifically the Lower Nooksack Subbasin, updating existing data sets and generating new data sets. This Data Management Plan provides an overview of the data sets, formats and collaboration environment that was used to develop the project. Use of a plan during development of the technical work products provided a forum for the data development and management to be conducted with transparent methods and processes. At project completion, the Data Management Plan provides an accessible archive of the data resources used and supporting information on the data storage, intended access, sharing and re-use guidelines.

    One goal of the Lower Nooksack Water Budget project is to make this “usable technical information” as accessible as possible across technical, policy and general public users. The project data, analyses and documents will be made available through the WRIA 1 Watershed Management Project website http://wria1project.org. This information is intended for use by the WRIA 1 Joint Board and partners working to achieve the adopted goals and priorities of the WRIA 1 Watershed Management Plan.

    Model outputs for the Lower Nooksack Water Budget are summarized by sub-watersheds (drainages) and point locations (nodes). In general, due to changes in land use over time and changes to available streamflow and climate data, the water budget for any watershed needs to be updated periodically. Further detailed information about data sources is provided in review packets developed for specific technical components including climate, streamflow and groundwater level, soils and land cover, and water use.

    Purpose: This project involves assembling a wide range of existing data related to the WRIA 1 and specifically the Lower Nooksack Subbasin, updating existing data sets and generating new data sets. Data will be used as input to various hydrologic, climatic and geomorphic components of the Topnet-Water Management (WM) model, but will also be available to support other modeling efforts in WRIA 1. Much of the data used as input to the Topnet model is publicly available and maintained by others, (i.e., USGS DEMs and streamflow data, SSURGO soils data, University of Washington gridded meteorological data). Pre-processing is performed to convert these existing data into a format that can be used as input to the Topnet model. Post-processing of Topnet model ASCII-text file outputs is subsequently combined with spatial data to generate GIS data that can be used to create maps and illustrations of the spatial distribution of water information. Other products generated during this project will include documentation of methods, input by WRIA 1 Joint Board Staff Team during review and comment periods, communication tools developed for public engagement and public comment on the project.

    In order to maintain an organized system of developing and distributing data, Lower Nooksack Water Budget project collaborators should be familiar with standards for data management described in this document, and the following issues related to generating and distributing data: 1. Standards for metadata and data formats 2. Plans for short-term storage and data management (i.e., file formats, local storage and back up procedures and security) 3. Legal and ethical issues (i.e., intellectual property, confidentiality of study participants) 4. Access policies and provisions (i.e., how the data will be made available to others, any restrictions needed) 5. Provisions for long-term archiving and preservation (i.e., establishment of a new data archive or utilization of an existing archive) 6. Assigned data management responsibilities (i.e., persons responsible for ensuring data Management, monitoring compliance with the Data Management Plan)

    This resource is a subset of the LNWB Ch03 Data Processes Collection Resource.

  8. d

    Data from: Mass-independent maximal metabolic rate predicts geographic range...

    • datadryad.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • +2more
    zip
    Updated Jan 9, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jack P. Hayes; Chris R. Feldman; Miguel B. Araújo (2019). Mass-independent maximal metabolic rate predicts geographic range size of placental mammals [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.08c4c
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 9, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    Dryad
    Authors
    Jack P. Hayes; Chris R. Feldman; Miguel B. Araújo
    Time period covered
    Jan 5, 2018
    Description

    1.Understanding the mechanisms driving geographic range sizes of species is a central issue in ecology, but remarkably few rules link physiology with the distributions of species. Maximal metabolic rate (MMR) during exercise is an important measure of physiological performance. It sets an upper limit to sustained activity and locomotor capacity, so MMR may influence ability to migrate, disperse, and maintain population connectivity. Using both conventional ordinary least squares (OLS) analyses and phylogenetically generalized least squares (PGLS), we tested whether MMR helps explain geographic range size in 51 species of placental mammals.

    2.Log body mass alone (OLS r2 = 0.074, p = 0.053; PGLS r2 = 0.016, p = 0.373) and log MMR alone (OLS r2 = 0.140, p = 0.007; PGLS r2 = 0.061, p = 0.081) were weak predictors of log range size.

    3.However, multiple regression of log body mass and log MMR accounted for over half of the variation in log range size (OLS R2 = 0.527, p < 0.001). The rela...

  9. S

    Shooting Range Management Software Report

    • marketreportanalytics.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Apr 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Market Report Analytics (2025). Shooting Range Management Software Report [Dataset]. https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/reports/shooting-range-management-software-73335
    Explore at:
    pdf, ppt, docAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 9, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Market Report Analytics
    License

    https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The global Shooting Range Management Software market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach a value of $996 million in 2025, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 6.1% from 2019 to 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. The increasing popularity of shooting sports, both recreationally and competitively, is driving demand for efficient and user-friendly software solutions. These solutions streamline operations, manage memberships, schedule bookings, track inventory, and enhance overall range safety and security. Furthermore, the rising adoption of cloud-based solutions offers scalability and accessibility benefits, appealing to both small, independent ranges and larger, multi-location businesses. The market segmentation reveals a strong presence across various application areas, including military and law enforcement, where software is crucial for training management and resource allocation, and the commercial and civil sectors, catering to recreational shooting enthusiasts. The shift towards cloud-based deployments is a significant trend, indicating a preference for flexibility and cost-effectiveness over on-premises solutions. However, challenges remain, including the need for robust data security measures to protect sensitive customer and operational information, and the potential for initial high implementation costs for some ranges. The competitive landscape is marked by a diverse range of established players and emerging startups. Major players like EZFacility, Omnify, and Epicor offer comprehensive solutions, while smaller companies such as Squadspot and Rangeworks cater to niche segments. The market's future growth will depend on several factors including technological advancements, evolving customer demands for integrated features (e.g., payment processing, customer relationship management), and the regulatory landscape governing data privacy and security in the firearms industry. Geographic growth will be influenced by the penetration of technology in different regions, with North America and Europe currently leading, followed by promising growth opportunities in the Asia-Pacific region driven by increasing participation in shooting sports and rising disposable incomes. The overall market outlook remains positive, suggesting continued growth and innovation in the Shooting Range Management Software sector throughout the forecast period.

  10. f

    Data Processing Has Major Impact on the Outcome of Quantitative Label-Free...

    • acs.figshare.com
    zip
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Aakash Chawade; Marianne Sandin; Johan Teleman; Johan Malmström; Fredrik Levander (2023). Data Processing Has Major Impact on the Outcome of Quantitative Label-Free LC-MS Analysis [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1021/pr500665j.s003
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    ACS Publications
    Authors
    Aakash Chawade; Marianne Sandin; Johan Teleman; Johan Malmström; Fredrik Levander
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    High-throughput multiplexed protein quantification using mass spectrometry is steadily increasing in popularity, with the two major techniques being data-dependent acquisition (DDA) and targeted acquisition using selected reaction monitoring (SRM). However, both techniques involve extensive data processing, which can be performed by a multitude of different software solutions. Analysis of quantitative LC-MS/MS data is mainly performed in three major steps: processing of raw data, normalization, and statistical analysis. To evaluate the impact of data processing steps, we developed two new benchmark data sets, one each for DDA and SRM, with samples consisting of a long-range dilution series of synthetic peptides spiked in a total cell protein digest. The generated data were processed by eight different software workflows and three postprocessing steps. The results show that the choice of the raw data processing software and the postprocessing steps play an important role in the final outcome. Also, the linear dynamic range of the DDA data could be extended by an order of magnitude through feature alignment and a charge state merging algorithm proposed here. Furthermore, the benchmark data sets are made publicly available for further benchmarking and software developments.

  11. w

    Population and Family Health Survey 2002 - Jordan

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    Updated Jun 6, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Department of Statistics (DOS) (2017). Population and Family Health Survey 2002 - Jordan [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/1409
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 6, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Department of Statistics (DOS)
    Time period covered
    2002
    Area covered
    Jordan
    Description

    Abstract

    The JPFHS is part of the worldwide Demographic and Health Surveys Program, which is designed to collect data on fertility, family planning, and maternal and child health. The primary objective of the Jordan Population and Family Health Survey (JPFHS) is to provide reliable estimates of demographic parameters, such as fertility, mortality, family planning, fertility preferences, as well as maternal and child health and nutrition that can be used by program managers and policy makers to evaluate and improve existing programs. In addition, the JPFHS data will be useful to researchers and scholars interested in analyzing demographic trends in Jordan, as well as those conducting comparative, regional or crossnational studies.

    The content of the 2002 JPFHS was significantly expanded from the 1997 survey to include additional questions on women’s status, reproductive health, and family planning. In addition, all women age 15-49 and children less than five years of age were tested for anemia.

    Geographic coverage

    National

    Analysis unit

    • Household
    • Children under five years
    • Women age 15-49
    • Men

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data

    Sampling procedure

    The estimates from a sample survey are affected by two types of errors: 1) nonsampling errors and 2) sampling errors. Nonsampling errors are the result of mistakes made in implementing data collection and data processing, such as failure to locate and interview the correct household, misunderstanding of the questions on the part of either the interviewer or the respondent, and data entry errors. Although numerous efforts were made during the implementation of the 2002 JPFHS to minimize this type of error, nonsampling errors are impossible to avoid and difficult to evaluate statistically.

    Sampling errors, on the other hand, can be evaluated statistically. The sample of respondents selected in the 2002 JPFHS is only one of many samples that could have been selected from the same population, using the same design and expected size. Each of these samples would yield results that differ somewhat from the results of the actual sample selected. Sampling errors are a measure of the variability between all possible samples. Although the degree of variability is not known exactly, it can be estimated from the survey results.

    A sampling error is usually measured in terms of the standard error for a particular statistic (mean, percentage, etc.), which is the square root of the variance. The standard error can be used to calculate confidence intervals within which the true value for the population can reasonably be assumed to fall. For example, for any given statistic calculated from a sample survey, the value of that statistic will fall within a range of plus or minus two times the standard error of that statistic in 95 percent of all possible samples of identical size and design.

    If the sample of respondents had been selected as a simple random sample, it would have been possible to use straightforward formulas for calculating sampling errors. However, the 2002 JPFHS sample is the result of a multistage stratified design and, consequently, it was necessary to use more complex formulas. The computer software used to calculate sampling errors for the 2002 JPFHS is the ISSA Sampling Error Module (ISSAS). This module used the Taylor linearization method of variance estimation for survey estimates that are means or proportions. The Jackknife repeated replication method is used for variance estimation of more complex statistics such as fertility and mortality rates.

    Note: See detailed description of sample design in APPENDIX B of the survey report.

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face

    Research instrument

    The 2002 JPFHS used two questionnaires – namely, the Household Questionnaire and the Individual Questionnaire. Both questionnaires were developed in English and translated into Arabic. The Household Questionnaire was used to list all usual members of the sampled households and to obtain information on each member’s age, sex, educational attainment, relationship to the head of household, and marital status. In addition, questions were included on the socioeconomic characteristics of the household, such as source of water, sanitation facilities, and the availability of durable goods. The Household Questionnaire was also used to identify women who are eligible for the individual interview: ever-married women age 15-49. In addition, all women age 15-49 and children under five years living in the household were measured to determine nutritional status and tested for anemia.

    The household and women’s questionnaires were based on the DHS Model “A” Questionnaire, which is designed for use in countries with high contraceptive prevalence. Additions and modifications to the model questionnaire were made in order to provide detailed information specific to Jordan, using experience gained from the 1990 and 1997 Jordan Population and Family Health Surveys. For each evermarried woman age 15 to 49, information on the following topics was collected:

    1. Respondent’s background
    2. Birth history
    3. Knowledge and practice of family planning
    4. Maternal care, breastfeeding, immunization, and health of children under five years of age
    5. Marriage
    6. Fertility preferences
    7. Husband’s background and respondent’s employment
    8. Knowledge of AIDS and STIs

    In addition, information on births and pregnancies, contraceptive use and discontinuation, and marriage during the five years prior to the survey was collected using a monthly calendar.

    Cleaning operations

    Fieldwork and data processing activities overlapped. After a week of data collection, and after field editing of questionnaires for completeness and consistency, the questionnaires for each cluster were packaged together and sent to the central office in Amman where they were registered and stored. Special teams were formed to carry out office editing and coding of the open-ended questions.

    Data entry and verification started after one week of office data processing. The process of data entry, including one hundred percent re-entry, editing and cleaning, was done by using PCs and the CSPro (Census and Survey Processing) computer package, developed specially for such surveys. The CSPro program allows data to be edited while being entered. Data processing operations were completed by the end of October 2002. A data processing specialist from ORC Macro made a trip to Jordan in October and November 2002 to follow up data editing and cleaning and to work on the tabulation of results for the survey preliminary report. The tabulations for the present final report were completed in December 2002.

    Response rate

    A total of 7,968 households were selected for the survey from the sampling frame; among those selected households, 7,907 households were found. Of those households, 7,825 (99 percent) were successfully interviewed. In those households, 6,151 eligible women were identified, and complete interviews were obtained with 6,006 of them (98 percent of all eligible women). The overall response rate was 97 percent.

    Note: See summarized response rates by place of residence in Table 1.1 of the survey report.

    Sampling error estimates

    The estimates from a sample survey are affected by two types of errors: 1) nonsampling errors and 2) sampling errors. Nonsampling errors are the result of mistakes made in implementing data collection and data processing, such as failure to locate and interview the correct household, misunderstanding of the questions on the part of either the interviewer or the respondent, and data entry errors. Although numerous efforts were made during the implementation of the 2002 JPFHS to minimize this type of error, nonsampling errors are impossible to avoid and difficult to evaluate statistically.

    Sampling errors, on the other hand, can be evaluated statistically. The sample of respondents selected in the 2002 JPFHS is only one of many samples that could have been selected from the same population, using the same design and expected size. Each of these samples would yield results that differ somewhat from the results of the actual sample selected. Sampling errors are a measure of the variability between all possible samples. Although the degree of variability is not known exactly, it can be estimated from the survey results.

    A sampling error is usually measured in terms of the standard error for a particular statistic (mean, percentage, etc.), which is the square root of the variance. The standard error can be used to calculate confidence intervals within which the true value for the population can reasonably be assumed to fall. For example, for any given statistic calculated from a sample survey, the value of that statistic will fall within a range of plus or minus two times the standard error of that statistic in 95 percent of all possible samples of identical size and design.

    If the sample of respondents had been selected as a simple random sample, it would have been possible to use straightforward formulas for calculating sampling errors. However, the 2002 JPFHS sample is the result of a multistage stratified design and, consequently, it was necessary to use more complex formulas. The computer software used to calculate sampling errors for the 2002 JPFHS is the ISSA Sampling Error Module (ISSAS). This module used the Taylor linearization method of variance estimation for survey estimates that are means or proportions. The Jackknife repeated replication method is used for variance estimation of more complex statistics such as fertility and mortality rates.

    Note: See detailed

  12. Government Open Data Management Platform Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast...

    • technavio.com
    pdf
    Updated Jul 20, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Technavio (2025). Government Open Data Management Platform Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025-2029: North America (US, Canada, and Mexico), Europe (France, Germany, Italy, and UK), APAC (Australia, China, and India), and Rest of World (ROW) [Dataset]. https://www.technavio.com/report/government-open-data-management-platform-market-industry-analysis
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 20, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    TechNavio
    Authors
    Technavio
    License

    https://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-noticehttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-notice

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2029
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Snapshot img

    Government Open Data Management Platform Market Size 2025-2029

    The government open data management platform market size is valued to increase by USD 189.4 million, at a CAGR of 12.5% from 2024 to 2029. Rising demand for digitalization in government operations will drive the government open data management platform market.

    Market Insights

    North America dominated the market and accounted for a 38% growth during the 2025-2029.
    By End-user - Large enterprises segment was valued at USD 108.50 million in 2023
    By Deployment - On-premises segment accounted for the largest market revenue share in 2023
    

    Market Size & Forecast

    Market Opportunities: USD 138.56 million 
    Market Future Opportunities 2024: USD 189.40 million
    CAGR from 2024 to 2029 : 12.5%
    

    Market Summary

    The market witnesses significant growth due to the increasing demand for digitalization in government operations. Open data management platforms enable governments to make large volumes of data available to the public in a machine-readable format, fostering transparency and accountability. The adoption of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in these platforms enhances data analysis capabilities, leading to more informed decision-making. However, data privacy concerns remain a major challenge in the open data management market. Governments must ensure the protection of sensitive information while making data publicly available. A real-world business scenario illustrating the importance of open data management platforms is supply chain optimization in the public sector.
    By sharing data related to procurement, logistics, and inventory management, governments can streamline their operations and improve efficiency. For instance, a city government could share real-time traffic data to optimize public transportation routes, reducing travel time and improving overall service delivery. Despite these benefits, it is crucial for governments to address data security concerns and establish robust data management policies to ensure the safe and effective use of open data platforms.
    

    What will be the size of the Government Open Data Management Platform Market during the forecast period?

    Get Key Insights on Market Forecast (PDF) Request Free Sample

    The market continues to evolve, with recent research indicating a significant increase in data reuse initiatives among government agencies. The use of open data platforms in the public sector has grown by over 25% in the last two years, driven by a need for transparency and improved data-driven decision making. This trend is particularly notable in areas such as compliance and budgeting, where accurate and accessible data is essential. Data replication strategies, data visualization libraries, and data portal design are key considerations for government agencies looking to optimize their open data management platforms.
    Effective data discovery tools and metadata schema design are crucial for ensuring data silos are minimized and data usage patterns are easily understood. Data privacy regulations, such as GDPR and HIPAA, also require robust data governance frameworks and data security audits to maintain data privacy and protect against breaches. Data access logs, data consistency checks, and data quality dashboards are essential components of any open data management platform, ensuring data accuracy and reliability. Data integration services and data sharing platforms enable seamless data exchange between different agencies and departments, while data federation techniques allow for data to be accessed in its original source without the need for data replication.
    Ultimately, these strategies contribute to a more efficient and effective data lifecycle, allowing government agencies to make informed decisions and deliver better services to their constituents.
    

    Unpacking the Government Open Data Management Platform Market Landscape

    The market encompasses a range of solutions designed to facilitate the efficient and secure handling of data throughout its lifecycle. According to recent studies, organizations adopting data lifecycle management practices experience a 30% reduction in data processing costs and a 25% improvement in ROI. Performance benchmarking is crucial for ensuring optimal system scalability, with leading platforms delivering up to 50% faster query response times than traditional systems. Data anonymization techniques and data modeling methods enable compliance with data protection regulations, while open data standards streamline data access and sharing. Data lineage tracking and metadata management are essential for maintaining data quality and ensuring data interoperability. API integration strategies and data transformation methods enable seamless data enrichment processes and knowledge graph implementation. Data access control, data versioning, and data security protocols

  13. Visualization in Real-Time Experiment

    • data.nasa.gov
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Jun 26, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2018). Visualization in Real-Time Experiment [Dataset]. https://data.nasa.gov/dataset/Visualization-in-Real-Time-Experiment/3sj9-yb5x
    Explore at:
    csv, xml, application/rdfxml, tsv, application/rssxml, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 26, 2018
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    With the increase in quantity and complexity of launches at the Wallops Flight Facility (WFF) there is an ever-growing need for a more capable real-time visualization system for the WFF Range Control Center (RCC). This system should have the ability to depict the vehicle using actual CAD vehicle models, display vehicle attitude and stage separation events, and utilize robust network protocol suitable for real-time safety applications. This project will use existing WFF hardware systems and leverage past experiences and lessons learned to produce a Visualization in Real-Time Experiment (VIRTEx) application that will use a cutting edge message protocol for lab demonstration and use during real-time operations.

    The objective of this project will be to migrate some of the outputs from the WFF Mission Planning Lab (MPL) into a real-time visualization system. The MPL is responsible for generating pre-flight RF margin link analysis, mission simulation & visualization, and other products for WFF missions. This real-time visualization system would depict in 3D graphics the position and orientation of the launch vehicle(s) or suborbital carrier (UAV, sounding rocket), VIRTEx would be expanded to use a more flexible publish/subscribe architecture, and the system will leverage recently developed advanced telemetry and data handling systems within the Range network.

    Another main objective will be updating VIRTEx to support a sounding rocket mission which is scheduled to launch from NASA Wallops Flight Facility (WFF) in the summer of 2014.

    This project will also be used to demonstrate the successful attitude data conversion from a WFF telemetry system. Updates are being finished on this telemetry system that convert various NASA Sounding Rocket attitude control systems (ACS) data formats. Multiple ACS systems output different data formats, so libraries and algorithms were added to the telemetry system to convert this data into a standard yaw, pitch, and roll dataset for Range Safety. VIRTEx will be able to easily show this data and will be able to compare it to the pre-flight attitude predictions.

  14. Research Data Management and Data Flow in ROCK-IT – Demonstrator for...

    • meta4ds.fokus.fraunhofer.de
    pdf, unknown
    Updated Nov 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Zenodo (2023). Research Data Management and Data Flow in ROCK-IT – Demonstrator for Automation and Remote-Access to Synchrotron Beamlines [Dataset]. https://meta4ds.fokus.fraunhofer.de/datasets/oai-zenodo-org-10064021?locale=en
    Explore at:
    pdf(769731), unknownAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 1, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    ROCK-IT aims to develop a demonstrator for automation and remote-access to beamlines of synchrotron radiation facilities. Remote access experiments for demanding in-situ and operando experiments is not available at the moment. The four participating Helmholtz centers DESY, HZB, HZDR, and KIT have identified catalysis operando experiments as a pilot development. So far, no automation exists for such experiments and since the optimization of catalysts requires to evaluate a large parameter space of experimental and material conditions, it is a perfect demonstrator case for a prototype including the management of the research data flow, data storage and data access. For the research community, a suitable automation of such experiments will allow for a more effective development workflow. Providing remote catalysis experiments would give a lot of advantages: standardization of the experiments on all levels is required, easier access also for non-expert users and industry would be provided and, therefore, innovation cycles can be accelerated. Remote access would significantly increase the resilience of the user operation against travel and working restrictions imposed during a pandemic, reduce the CO2 footprint of the entire operation due to less travel requirements of users, and increase the efficiency due to a higher degree of automation by advanced robotics and suitable software tools allowing e. g. the automatic sampling and evaluation of large experimental parameter spaces. The name ROCK-IT (remote, operando controlled, knowledge-driven, IT-based) summarizes the mayor challenges faced with the demonstrator development. Research data handling, data flow and data management are core aspects of the project. Artificial intelligence for automatically conducting the experiments, evaluation of the data in real-time for adjusting experimental parameters, and suitable robotic and automation for changing samples is required for optimizing the performance. ROCK-IT intents to provide solutions in generic building blocks portable enough to be applicable to a wide range of measurements. The building blocks include standardized and interchangeable data formats, standardized metadata collection, interfaces to electronic lab books, sample tracking and handling, AI-based experiment control and data evaluation, and automation of experiments under remote control. As a greater integration of digital technologies is accompanied by higher attack potential in the digital space, cyber security considerations play an important role within ROCK-IT. Connections to ErUM-Data and DAPHNE4NFDI within the research community are established to make use of synergies. ROCK-IT covers all tasks along the data flow from the experiment to the data storage in different work packages: Aspects of remote access and cyber security are addressed in one work package including identity management and secure data transfer. The work packages responsible for the experimental conditions, and automation and control define the requirements concerning the research data and metadata of the experiments to be stored. Additional metadata will be generated by the established tools of first and near real-time data evaluation. A dedicated work package deals with all aspects of handling and archiving the experimental data with the relevant metadata. A data management plan distinguishing different user groups such as research groups or industry partners is required to make the data available according to the F.A.I.R. principle. This contribution gives an overview over the research data management and data flow plan in ROCK-IT. It shows the different aspects tackled by ROCK-IT. The full data life cycle consists of a pre-experimental registration, the experimental (meta-)data aggregation, the live data analysis which demands and produces additional meta data, up to the publishing with different access permissions as data for commercial purposes has also be dealt with. Besides covering the full data life cycle, different communities are connected in the project. Of course, the catalysis community with its connection to DAFNE4NFDI. and NFDI4CAT participates, but also accelerator physics community which might also be interested in PUNCH4NFDI activities. As the data is pre-analyzed using data scientific methods a connection with NFDI4DS might also be fruitful. As a demonstrator project ROCK-IT aims to provide best practices also for other communities, beamlines and accelerator facilities that are not yet covered by NFDI sections.

  15. Big Data As A Service Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025-2029: North...

    • technavio.com
    pdf
    Updated Aug 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Technavio (2025). Big Data As A Service Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025-2029: North America (US, Canada, and Mexico), Europe (France, Germany, Russia, and UK), APAC (China, India, and Japan), and Rest of World (ROW) [Dataset]. https://www.technavio.com/report/big-data-as-a-service-market-industry-analysis
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 15, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    TechNavio
    Authors
    Technavio
    License

    https://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-noticehttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-notice

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2029
    Area covered
    Canada, Germany, Europe, United Kingdom, United States
    Description

    Snapshot img

    Big Data As A Service Market Size 2025-2029

    The big data as a service market size is forecast to increase by USD 75.71 billion, at a CAGR of 20.5% between 2024 and 2029.

    The Big Data as a Service (BDaaS) market is experiencing significant growth, driven by the increasing volume of data being generated daily. This trend is further fueled by the rising popularity of big data in emerging technologies, such as blockchain, which requires massive amounts of data for optimal functionality. However, this market is not without challenges. Data privacy and security risks pose a significant obstacle, as the handling of large volumes of data increases the potential for breaches and cyberattacks. Edge computing solutions and on-premise data centers facilitate real-time data processing and analysis, while alerting systems and data validation rules maintain data quality.
    Companies must navigate these challenges to effectively capitalize on the opportunities presented by the BDaaS market. By implementing robust data security measures and adhering to data privacy regulations, organizations can mitigate risks and build trust with their customers, ensuring long-term success in this dynamic market.
    

    What will be the Size of the Big Data As A Service Market during the forecast period?

    Get Key Insights on Market Forecast (PDF) Request Free Sample

    The market continues to evolve, offering a range of solutions that address various data management needs across industries. Hadoop ecosystem services play a crucial role in handling large volumes of data, while ETL process optimization ensures data quality metrics are met. Data transformation services and data pipeline automation streamline data workflows, enabling businesses to derive valuable insights from their data. Nosql database solutions and custom data solutions cater to unique data requirements, with Spark cluster management optimizing performance. Data security protocols, metadata management tools, and data encryption methods protect sensitive information. Cloud data storage, predictive modeling APIs, and real-time data ingestion facilitate agile data processing.
    Data anonymization techniques and data governance frameworks ensure compliance with regulations. Machine learning algorithms, access control mechanisms, and data processing pipelines drive automation and efficiency. API integration services, scalable data infrastructure, and distributed computing platforms enable seamless data integration and processing. Data lineage tracking, high-velocity data streams, data visualization dashboards, and data lake formation provide actionable insights for informed decision-making.
    For instance, a leading retailer leveraged data warehousing services and predictive modeling APIs to analyze customer buying patterns, resulting in a 15% increase in sales. This success story highlights the potential of big data solutions to drive business growth and innovation.
    

    How is this Big Data As A Service Industry segmented?

    The big data as a service industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

    Type
    
      Data Analytics-as-a-service (DAaaS)
      Hadoop-as-a-service (HaaS)
      Data-as-a-service (DaaS)
    
    
    Deployment
    
      Public cloud
      Hybrid cloud
      Private cloud
    
    
    End-user
    
      Large enterprises
      SMEs
    
    
    Geography
    
      North America
    
        US
        Canada
        Mexico
    
    
      Europe
    
        France
        Germany
        Russia
        UK
    
    
      APAC
    
        China
        India
        Japan
    
    
      Rest of World (ROW)
    

    By Type Insights

    The Data analytics-as-a-service (DAaas) segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period. The data analytics-as-a-service (DAaaS) segment experiences significant growth within the market. Currently, over 30% of businesses adopt cloud-based data analytics solutions, reflecting the increasing demand for flexible, cost-effective alternatives to traditional on-premises infrastructure. Furthermore, industry experts anticipate that the DAaaS market will expand by approximately 25% in the upcoming years. This market segment offers organizations of all sizes the opportunity to access advanced analytical tools without the need for substantial capital investment and operational overhead. DAaaS solutions encompass the entire data analytics process, from data ingestion and preparation to advanced modeling and visualization, on a subscription or pay-per-use basis. Data integration tools, data cataloging systems, self-service data discovery, and data version control enhance data accessibility and usability.

    The continuous evolution of this market is driven by the increasing volume, variety, and velocity of data, as well as the growing recognition of the business value that can be derived from data insights. Organizations across var

  16. D

    Data Analysis Storage Management Market Report

    • promarketreports.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Jun 18, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Pro Market Reports (2025). Data Analysis Storage Management Market Report [Dataset]. https://www.promarketreports.com/reports/data-analysis-storage-management-market-6129
    Explore at:
    ppt, pdf, docAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 18, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Pro Market Reports
    License

    https://www.promarketreports.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.promarketreports.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The Data Analysis Storage Management market offers a diverse range of products and services designed to meet the varying needs of data-intensive industries. These offerings can be broadly categorized as:Data Analysis Software & Workbenches: These tools provide interactive data analysis capabilities, advanced data visualization features, and sophisticated statistical modeling functionalities, enabling users to extract valuable insights from complex datasets.Storage, Management & Cloud Computing Solutions: This category encompasses secure and scalable storage solutions, robust data management platforms, and flexible cloud-based infrastructure designed to handle the increasing volume and velocity of data generated across diverse applications. These solutions often incorporate advanced features like data encryption, access controls, and disaster recovery mechanisms.Data Analysis Services: This segment offers professional services encompassing data integration, data cleansing, and advanced analytical services for complex datasets. These services are particularly valuable for organizations lacking in-house expertise or facing challenges in managing their data effectively. They often include consulting, implementation, and ongoing support. Recent developments include: In December2020, IBM Corporation (US) announced the addition of newer capabilities into its AI platform- IBM Watson. These capabilities include improving AI automation, expansion in precision level in natural language processing (NLP), and promoting the insights fetched from AI-based projections. In October 2020,Advanced Micro Devices (US) announced that it has agreed to buy Xilinx (US) in a USD 35 billion all-stock deal.Xilinx develops highly flexible and adaptive processing platforms that enable rapid innovation across various technologies - from the cloud to the edge and the endpoint. In October 2020, Intel Corporation (US), in collaboration with the Government of Telangana, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad, and Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), announced the launch of INAI, an applied artificial intelligence (AI) research center in Hyderabad.INAI is an initiative to apply AI to population-scale problems in the Indian context, with a focus on identifying and solving challenges in healthcare and smart mobility.. Key drivers for this market are: INCREASING DEMAND DUE TO EXTENSIVE AMOUNT OF DATA GENERATED IN THE LIFE SCIENCES SECTOR, HUGE DATA STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; ACCESSIBILITY OF PATIENT DATA AND GOVERNMENT INITIATIVES TO SUPPORT GROWTH. Potential restraints include: HIGH COST OF IMPLEMENTATION AND DATA SECURITY, LACK OF DATASETS AND PROTECTIONISM.

  17. g

    Habitat Planning Range

    • geohub.lio.gov.on.ca
    Updated Apr 1, 1998
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Land Information Ontario (1998). Habitat Planning Range [Dataset]. https://geohub.lio.gov.on.ca/documents/d732718886a541769cd849b83758bcc0
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 1, 1998
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Land Information Ontario
    License

    https://lio.maps.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/21b8192cd45b483385c63fa0326e629a/datahttps://lio.maps.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/21b8192cd45b483385c63fa0326e629a/data

    Area covered
    Description

    The data referenced here is licensed Electronic Intellectual Property of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry and is provided for professional, non-commercial use only.

    A Habitat Planning Range is a polygon feature that identifies an area for which habitat criteria, climatological imformation, and species occurrence information combine to make it an exemplary habitat for a particular species.

    Additional DocumentationHabitat Planning Range - Data Description (PDF)Habitat Planning Range - Documentation (Word)

    Status

    Completed: production of the data has been completed

    Maintenance and Update Frequency

    As needed: data is updated as deemed necessary

    Contact

    Caryn Perry, Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, caryn.perry@ontario.ca

    To request access to restricted use data, email the dataset contact or Information Access Analyst at emily.hill@ontario.ca.

    The data referenced here is licensed Electronic Intellectual Property of the Ontario Ministry of Northern Development, Mines, Natural Resources and Forestry and is provided for professional, non-commercial use only.

  18. G

    CO2 MRV Data Management Platform Market Research Report 2033

    • growthmarketreports.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Oct 4, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Growth Market Reports (2025). CO2 MRV Data Management Platform Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/co2-mrv-data-management-platform-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, pptx, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 4, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Growth Market Reports
    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    CO2 MRV Data Management Platform Market Outlook



    According to our latest research, the CO2 MRV Data Management Platform market size reached USD 1.48 billion globally in 2024, demonstrating a robust expansion trajectory. The market is growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.2% and is anticipated to reach USD 4.07 billion by 2033. This growth is primarily driven by the increasing regulatory requirements for carbon monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) across major industries, as corporations and governments intensify efforts to meet net-zero targets and improve transparency in emissions management.



    The primary growth factor for the CO2 MRV Data Management Platform market is the global escalation of climate initiatives and carbon neutrality commitments. Governments worldwide are tightening environmental regulations and mandating more rigorous emissions tracking and reporting, compelling organizations to adopt advanced MRV solutions. The proliferation of carbon pricing mechanisms, such as emissions trading systems and carbon taxes, further accentuates the need for accurate, real-time data collection and analytics. This regulatory landscape, combined with increasing stakeholder demand for sustainability disclosures, is accelerating the deployment of sophisticated CO2 MRV platforms across diverse sectors, including oil & gas, power generation, manufacturing, and transportation.



    Technological advancements are another critical driver for the growth of the CO2 MRV Data Management Platform market. The integration of IoT sensors, AI-powered analytics, and cloud computing has revolutionized the way emissions data is collected, processed, and reported. These technologies enable organizations to automate data capture, ensure data integrity, and generate actionable insights for compliance and strategic decision-making. As digital transformation sweeps through industrial operations, the adoption of scalable, interoperable MRV platforms is becoming essential for organizations aiming to optimize their carbon management strategies and achieve operational efficiencies while adhering to global standards.



    Additionally, the growing emphasis on corporate sustainability and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) reporting is fueling market expansion. Investors and consumers are increasingly prioritizing companies with transparent and verifiable climate action plans. As a result, businesses are investing in CO2 MRV Data Management Platforms to enhance their reporting capabilities, reduce the risk of greenwashing, and build trust with stakeholders. The market is also witnessing the emergence of specialized service providers offering tailored MRV solutions, which is further broadening the addressable market and fostering innovation in platform functionalities.



    From a regional perspective, North America and Europe are leading in the adoption of CO2 MRV Data Management Platforms, driven by stringent regulatory frameworks and early adoption of digital technologies. However, the Asia Pacific region is expected to register the highest growth rate during the forecast period, supported by rapid industrialization, increasing environmental awareness, and evolving regulatory landscapes. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also witnessing gradual uptake, particularly in sectors like oil & gas and power generation, as governments in these regions step up efforts to align with global climate goals.





    Component Analysis



    The CO2 MRV Data Management Platform market is segmented by component into software, hardware, and services, each playing a vital role in the ecosystem. Software forms the backbone of these platforms, providing the core functionalities for data collection, processing, analytics, and reporting. Modern MRV software solutions are designed to be highly configurable, supporting integration with a wide range of data sources such as IoT sensors, SCADA systems, and enterprise resource planning (ERP) software. The software segment is witnessing significant inn

  19. G

    Onboard Data Processing Market Research Report 2033

    • growthmarketreports.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Oct 6, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Growth Market Reports (2025). Onboard Data Processing Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/onboard-data-processing-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, pptx, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 6, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Growth Market Reports
    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Onboard Data Processing Market Outlook



    According to our latest research, the global onboard data processing market size reached USD 3.62 billion in 2024, reflecting robust demand across multiple industries. The market is expected to demonstrate a strong growth trajectory with a CAGR of 13.7% from 2025 to 2033. By the end of 2033, the onboard data processing market is forecasted to attain a value of USD 11.18 billion. This impressive growth is driven by the increasing need for real-time data analytics, the proliferation of satellite and UAV deployments, and advancements in edge computing technologies. As per our latest research, organizations are rapidly adopting onboard data processing solutions to enhance operational efficiency, minimize latency, and improve decision-making capabilities across diverse platforms and applications.




    One of the primary growth factors propelling the onboard data processing market is the exponential increase in the volume and complexity of data generated by satellites, UAVs, aircraft, and maritime platforms. As these platforms gather vast amounts of raw data, there is a pressing need to process information closer to the source to enable real-time analytics and actionable insights. This trend is particularly prominent in earth observation and remote sensing applications, where rapid data processing is essential for timely responses to environmental changes, disaster management, and resource monitoring. The integration of advanced onboard processing hardware and software solutions is enabling stakeholders to reduce data transmission costs, minimize bandwidth requirements, and ensure high data fidelity, which collectively contribute to the market's sustained expansion.




    Another significant driver is the evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms, which are increasingly being embedded into onboard data processing systems. These intelligent algorithms allow platforms to autonomously analyze, interpret, and act upon vast datasets without the need for constant human intervention or ground-based processing. This capability is particularly crucial for defense and intelligence operations, where real-time situational awareness and rapid decision-making can be mission-critical. Furthermore, commercial sectors such as telecommunications, navigation, and scientific research are leveraging onboard data processing to enhance service delivery, optimize resource utilization, and support innovative business models. The convergence of AI/ML with edge computing is setting new standards for onboard data processing efficiency, scalability, and reliability.




    The growing adoption of onboard data processing is also fueled by the increasing deployment of small satellites (smallsats) and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for a wide range of commercial and governmental applications. These platforms are often constrained by limited power, size, and communication bandwidth, making onboard data processing an essential enabler for their successful operation. By processing data locally, these platforms can transmit only relevant information to ground stations, thereby reducing latency and improving operational responsiveness. Additionally, the emergence of modular and scalable onboard processing architectures is allowing organizations to customize solutions based on specific mission requirements, further driving market growth. The ongoing advancements in semiconductor technologies and miniaturization are expected to further enhance the capabilities and adoption of onboard data processing solutions in the coming years.




    From a regional perspective, North America continues to dominate the onboard data processing market, followed closely by Europe and Asia Pacific. The region's leadership is attributed to significant investments in space exploration, defense modernization, and commercial satellite programs. Meanwhile, Asia Pacific is witnessing the fastest growth, driven by expanding space programs, increasing UAV adoption, and rising demand for advanced communication and navigation solutions. Europe remains a key player due to its strong focus on scientific research, environmental monitoring, and collaborative space missions. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also experiencing steady growth, albeit at a slower pace, as governments and private entities in these regions increasingly recognize the benefits of onboard data processing for various applications.



    <div class="free_sample_div text-c

  20. G

    Data Preparation Tools Market Research Report 2033

    • growthmarketreports.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Aug 23, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Growth Market Reports (2025). Data Preparation Tools Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/data-preparation-tools-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, pptx, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 23, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Growth Market Reports
    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Data Preparation Tools Market Outlook



    According to our latest research, the global Data Preparation Tools market size reached USD 5.2 billion in 2024, demonstrating robust momentum driven by the surging need for efficient data management and analytics across industries. The market is witnessing a strong compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 18.4% from 2025 to 2033. By the end of 2033, the market is projected to attain a value of USD 25.2 billion. This remarkable growth trajectory is primarily fueled by the exponential increase in data volumes, the proliferation of advanced analytics initiatives, and the push for digital transformation in both established enterprises and emerging businesses worldwide.




    One of the primary growth factors for the Data Preparation Tools market is the escalating demand for self-service analytics tools among business users and data professionals. Organizations are generating massive volumes of structured and unstructured data from diverse sources, including IoT devices, social media, enterprise applications, and customer interactions. Traditional data preparation methods, which are often manual and time-consuming, have become inadequate to handle this scale and complexity. As a result, businesses are increasingly adopting modern data preparation solutions that automate data cleaning, integration, and transformation processes. These tools empower users to access, combine, and analyze data more efficiently, thereby accelerating decision-making and enhancing business agility.




    Another significant driver for market expansion is the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) capabilities within data preparation platforms. By leveraging AI and ML algorithms, these tools can automatically detect data anomalies, suggest transformations, and streamline the entire data preparation workflow. This not only reduces the dependency on IT teams but also democratizes data access across the organization. The ability to rapidly prepare high-quality data for analytics is becoming a critical differentiator for companies seeking to gain actionable insights and maintain a competitive edge. Furthermore, the growing emphasis on data governance and regulatory compliance is compelling organizations to invest in advanced data preparation tools that ensure data accuracy, lineage, and security.




    The proliferation of cloud-based data preparation solutions is also fueling market growth, as organizations seek scalable, flexible, and cost-effective platforms to manage their data assets. Cloud deployment models enable seamless collaboration among distributed teams and facilitate integration with a wide range of data sources and analytics applications. Additionally, the rise of hybrid and multi-cloud strategies is driving the adoption of cloud-native data preparation tools that can handle complex data environments with ease. As enterprises continue to embrace digital transformation, the demand for cloud-enabled data preparation platforms is expected to surge, further propelling the market's expansion over the forecast period.




    From a regional perspective, North America currently dominates the Data Preparation Tools market, accounting for the largest share in 2024, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. The strong presence of leading technology vendors, early adoption of advanced analytics, and the high concentration of data-driven enterprises are key factors contributing to North America's leadership. Meanwhile, Asia Pacific is emerging as a high-growth region, driven by rapid industrialization, increasing digitalization, and significant investments in big data and analytics infrastructure. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also witnessing steady adoption, primarily among large enterprises and government organizations seeking to optimize data-driven decision-making.





    Component Analysis



    The Data Preparation Tools market by component is segmented into Software and Services. The software segment dominates the market, owing to t

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Dataintelo (2025). Command And Data Handling Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/command-and-data-handling-market

Command And Data Handling Market Research Report 2033

Explore at:
csv, pptx, pdfAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Sep 30, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
Dataintelo
License

https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

Time period covered
2024 - 2032
Area covered
Global
Description

Command and Data Handling Market Outlook



According to our latest research, the global command and data handling (C&DH) market size is valued at USD 3.2 billion in 2024, demonstrating robust momentum driven by the increasing deployment of satellites and sophisticated space missions. The market is forecasted to reach USD 6.8 billion by 2033, expanding at a healthy CAGR of 8.7% during the period from 2025 to 2033. This impressive growth is primarily fueled by the rising demand for advanced satellite-based services, increased governmental investments in space exploration, and the proliferation of private sector participation in space activities. As per our latest research, the command and data handling market is poised for significant transformation, underpinned by technological advancements and the surging necessity for real-time data management in both commercial and defense space applications.




The growth trajectory of the command and data handling market is strongly influenced by the escalating number of satellite launches and the need for reliable, high-performance onboard data processing systems. The rapid expansion of satellite constellations for communication, navigation, and Earth observation has necessitated the development of more sophisticated C&DH subsystems. These subsystems are crucial for managing mission-critical operations, including telemetry, tracking, and command functions, as well as handling vast volumes of scientific and operational data. As satellite missions become more complex and multi-faceted, the demand for advanced C&DH solutions capable of supporting autonomous operations and resilient data handling is expected to surge, further propelling market growth.




Another significant driver for the command and data handling market is the increasing adoption of miniaturized and modular C&DH solutions, especially for small satellites and CubeSats. The trend towards miniaturization has enabled a broader range of organizations, including academic institutions and emerging private players, to participate in space missions at a lower cost. This democratization of access to space has resulted in a burgeoning demand for scalable, cost-effective, and highly reliable C&DH systems. Additionally, advancements in software-defined architectures and real-time data analytics are enhancing the flexibility and efficiency of C&DH systems, making them more adaptable to evolving mission requirements and operational environments.




The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies into C&DH systems is another pivotal factor shaping the market’s future. AI and ML algorithms are enabling autonomous decision-making and predictive maintenance for spacecraft, thereby reducing the reliance on ground control and improving mission success rates. The incorporation of these advanced technologies is also facilitating enhanced onboard data processing, anomaly detection, and fault management, which are critical for long-duration deep space missions. As space agencies and commercial entities continue to push the boundaries of space exploration, the role of intelligent C&DH systems will become increasingly central to mission planning, execution, and data exploitation.




From a regional perspective, North America continues to dominate the command and data handling market, owing to its mature space industry, substantial government funding, and the presence of leading aerospace companies. However, significant growth is also being observed in regions such as Asia Pacific and Europe, where increasing investments in indigenous space programs and the emergence of new commercial satellite operators are driving demand for advanced C&DH solutions. The competitive landscape is further intensified by the entry of innovative startups and technology firms, particularly in countries like India, China, and Japan, which are rapidly expanding their capabilities in space technology development and deployment.



Component Analysis



The command and data handling market by component is segmented into hardware, software, and services, each playing a vital role in the overall performance and reliability of space missions. Hardware remains the backbone of the C&DH system, encompassing processors, memory units, data buses, and telemetry interfaces. These components are engineered to withstand the harsh conditions of space, including radiation, extreme temperatures, and mechanical

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu